CVE-2016-7437
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2016-10-13 14:00
Modified
2024-08-06 01:57
Severity ?
EPSS score ?
Summary
SAP Netweaver 7.40 improperly logs (1) DUI and (2) DUJ events in the SAP Security Audit Log as non-critical, which might allow local users to hide rejected attempts to execute RFC function callbacks by leveraging filtering of non-critical events in audit analysis reports, aka SAP Security Note 2252312.
References
▼ | URL | Tags | |
---|---|---|---|
cve@mitre.org | http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Oct/53 | Third Party Advisory | |
cve@mitre.org | http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/93503 | Broken Link | |
cve@mitre.org | https://www.onapsis.com/research/security-advisories/sap-business-objects-memory-corruption-0 | Permissions Required, Third Party Advisory | |
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Oct/53 | Third Party Advisory | |
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/93503 | Broken Link | |
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://www.onapsis.com/research/security-advisories/sap-business-objects-memory-corruption-0 | Permissions Required, Third Party Advisory |
{ "containers": { "adp": [ { "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T01:57:47.627Z", "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "shortName": "CVE" }, "references": [ { "name": "93503", "tags": [ "vdb-entry", "x_refsource_BID", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/93503" }, { "tags": [ "x_refsource_MISC", "x_transferred" ], "url": "https://www.onapsis.com/research/security-advisories/sap-business-objects-memory-corruption-0" }, { "name": "20161011 Onapsis Security Advisory ONAPSIS-2016-051: SAP Business Objects Memory Corruption", "tags": [ "mailing-list", "x_refsource_FULLDISC", "x_transferred" ], "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Oct/53" } ], "title": "CVE Program Container" } ], "cna": { "affected": [ { "product": "n/a", "vendor": "n/a", "versions": [ { "status": "affected", "version": "n/a" } ] } ], "datePublic": "2016-09-22T00:00:00", "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "SAP Netweaver 7.40 improperly logs (1) DUI and (2) DUJ events in the SAP Security Audit Log as non-critical, which might allow local users to hide rejected attempts to execute RFC function callbacks by leveraging filtering of non-critical events in audit analysis reports, aka SAP Security Note 2252312." } ], "problemTypes": [ { "descriptions": [ { "description": "n/a", "lang": "en", "type": "text" } ] } ], "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2016-10-13T13:57:01", "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca", "shortName": "mitre" }, "references": [ { "name": "93503", "tags": [ "vdb-entry", "x_refsource_BID" ], "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/93503" }, { "tags": [ "x_refsource_MISC" ], "url": "https://www.onapsis.com/research/security-advisories/sap-business-objects-memory-corruption-0" }, { "name": "20161011 Onapsis Security Advisory ONAPSIS-2016-051: SAP Business Objects Memory Corruption", "tags": [ "mailing-list", "x_refsource_FULLDISC" ], "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Oct/53" } ], "x_legacyV4Record": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org", "ID": "CVE-2016-7437", "STATE": "PUBLIC" }, "affects": { "vendor": { "vendor_data": [ { "product": { "product_data": [ { "product_name": "n/a", "version": { "version_data": [ { "version_value": "n/a" } ] } } ] }, "vendor_name": "n/a" } ] } }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "SAP Netweaver 7.40 improperly logs (1) DUI and (2) DUJ events in the SAP Security Audit Log as non-critical, which might allow local users to hide rejected attempts to execute RFC function callbacks by leveraging filtering of non-critical events in audit analysis reports, aka SAP Security Note 2252312." } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "n/a" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "93503", "refsource": "BID", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/93503" }, { "name": "https://www.onapsis.com/research/security-advisories/sap-business-objects-memory-corruption-0", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://www.onapsis.com/research/security-advisories/sap-business-objects-memory-corruption-0" }, { "name": "20161011 Onapsis Security Advisory ONAPSIS-2016-051: SAP Business Objects Memory Corruption", "refsource": "FULLDISC", "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Oct/53" } ] } } } }, "cveMetadata": { "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca", "assignerShortName": "mitre", "cveId": "CVE-2016-7437", "datePublished": "2016-10-13T14:00:00", "dateReserved": "2016-09-09T00:00:00", "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T01:57:47.627Z", "state": "PUBLISHED" }, "dataType": "CVE_RECORD", "dataVersion": "5.1", "vulnerability-lookup:meta": { "fkie_nvd": { "configurations": "[{\"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:sap:netweaver:7.40:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"F019F7F5-7740-4BD4-850F-D7A1923C6200\"}]}]}]", "descriptions": "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"SAP Netweaver 7.40 improperly logs (1) DUI and (2) DUJ events in the SAP Security Audit Log as non-critical, which might allow local users to hide rejected attempts to execute RFC function callbacks by leveraging filtering of non-critical events in audit analysis reports, aka SAP Security Note 2252312.\"}, {\"lang\": \"es\", \"value\": \"SAP Netweaver 7.40 registra incorrectamente eventos (1) DUI y (2) DUJ en el SAP Security Audit Log como no cr\\u00edticos, lo que podr\\u00eda permitir a usuarios locales ocultar intentos rechazados de ejecutar la rellamada a la funci\\u00f3n RFC aprovechando el filtrado de eventos no cr\\u00edticos en informes de auditoria de an\\u00e1lisis, vulnerabilidad tambi\\u00e9n conocida como SAP Security Note 2252312.\"}]", "evaluatorComment": "\u003ca href=\"http://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/778.html\"\u003eCWE-778: Insufficient Logging\u003c/a\u003e", "id": "CVE-2016-7437", "lastModified": "2024-11-21T02:58:00.530", "metrics": "{\"cvssMetricV30\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"3.0\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N\", \"baseScore\": 3.3, \"baseSeverity\": \"LOW\", \"attackVector\": \"LOCAL\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"LOW\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"integrityImpact\": \"LOW\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\"}, \"exploitabilityScore\": 1.8, \"impactScore\": 1.4}], \"cvssMetricV2\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"2.0\", \"vectorString\": \"AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N\", \"baseScore\": 2.1, \"accessVector\": \"LOCAL\", \"accessComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"authentication\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"integrityImpact\": \"PARTIAL\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\"}, \"baseSeverity\": \"LOW\", \"exploitabilityScore\": 3.9, \"impactScore\": 2.9, \"acInsufInfo\": false, \"obtainAllPrivilege\": false, \"obtainUserPrivilege\": false, \"obtainOtherPrivilege\": false, \"userInteractionRequired\": false}]}", "published": "2016-10-13T14:59:12.237", "references": "[{\"url\": \"http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Oct/53\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\", \"tags\": [\"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/93503\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\", \"tags\": [\"Broken Link\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://www.onapsis.com/research/security-advisories/sap-business-objects-memory-corruption-0\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\", \"tags\": [\"Permissions Required\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Oct/53\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/93503\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Broken Link\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://www.onapsis.com/research/security-advisories/sap-business-objects-memory-corruption-0\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Permissions Required\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}]", "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org", "vulnStatus": "Modified", "weaknesses": "[{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"NVD-CWE-Other\"}]}]" }, "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2016-7437\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2016-10-13T14:59:12.237\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T02:58:00.530\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"SAP Netweaver 7.40 improperly logs (1) DUI and (2) DUJ events in the SAP Security Audit Log as non-critical, which might allow local users to hide rejected attempts to execute RFC function callbacks by leveraging filtering of non-critical events in audit analysis reports, aka SAP Security Note 2252312.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"SAP Netweaver 7.40 registra incorrectamente eventos (1) DUI y (2) DUJ en el SAP Security Audit Log como no cr\u00edticos, lo que podr\u00eda permitir a usuarios locales ocultar intentos rechazados de ejecutar la rellamada a la funci\u00f3n RFC aprovechando el filtrado de eventos no cr\u00edticos en informes de auditoria de an\u00e1lisis, vulnerabilidad tambi\u00e9n conocida como SAP Security Note 2252312.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV30\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N\",\"baseScore\":3.3,\"baseSeverity\":\"LOW\",\"attackVector\":\"LOCAL\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"LOW\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":1.8,\"impactScore\":1.4}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N\",\"baseScore\":2.1,\"accessVector\":\"LOCAL\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"LOW\",\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":2.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"NVD-CWE-Other\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:sap:netweaver:7.40:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"F019F7F5-7740-4BD4-850F-D7A1923C6200\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Oct/53\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/93503\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Broken Link\"]},{\"url\":\"https://www.onapsis.com/research/security-advisories/sap-business-objects-memory-corruption-0\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Permissions Required\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2016/Oct/53\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/93503\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Broken Link\"]},{\"url\":\"https://www.onapsis.com/research/security-advisories/sap-business-objects-memory-corruption-0\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Permissions Required\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]}],\"evaluatorComment\":\"\u003ca href=\\\"http://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/778.html\\\"\u003eCWE-778: Insufficient Logging\u003c/a\u003e\"}}" } }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.