CVE-2017-11424 (GCVE-0-2017-11424)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2017-08-24 16:00 – Updated: 2024-08-05 18:12
VLAI?
Summary
In PyJWT 1.5.0 and below the `invalid_strings` check in `HMACAlgorithm.prepare_key` does not account for all PEM encoded public keys. Specifically, the PKCS1 PEM encoded format would be allowed because it is prefaced with the string `-----BEGIN RSA PUBLIC KEY-----` which is not accounted for. This enables symmetric/asymmetric key confusion attacks against users using the PKCS1 PEM encoded public keys, which would allow an attacker to craft JWTs from scratch.
Severity ?
No CVSS data available.
CWE
- n/a
Assigner
References
| URL | Tags | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-05T18:12:39.550Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "DSA-3979",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_DEBIAN",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3979"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/jpadilla/pyjwt/pull/277"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "n/a",
"vendor": "n/a",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "n/a"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2017-06-22T00:00:00",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In PyJWT 1.5.0 and below the `invalid_strings` check in `HMACAlgorithm.prepare_key` does not account for all PEM encoded public keys. Specifically, the PKCS1 PEM encoded format would be allowed because it is prefaced with the string `-----BEGIN RSA PUBLIC KEY-----` which is not accounted for. This enables symmetric/asymmetric key confusion attacks against users using the PKCS1 PEM encoded public keys, which would allow an attacker to craft JWTs from scratch."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "n/a",
"lang": "en",
"type": "text"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2017-11-03T18:57:01",
"orgId": "7cd4c57f-0a88-4dda-be53-70336b413766",
"shortName": "duo"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "DSA-3979",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_DEBIAN"
],
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3979"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/jpadilla/pyjwt/pull/277"
}
],
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "security@duo.com",
"ID": "CVE-2017-11424",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "n/a",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "n/a"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "n/a"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "In PyJWT 1.5.0 and below the `invalid_strings` check in `HMACAlgorithm.prepare_key` does not account for all PEM encoded public keys. Specifically, the PKCS1 PEM encoded format would be allowed because it is prefaced with the string `-----BEGIN RSA PUBLIC KEY-----` which is not accounted for. This enables symmetric/asymmetric key confusion attacks against users using the PKCS1 PEM encoded public keys, which would allow an attacker to craft JWTs from scratch."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "n/a"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "DSA-3979",
"refsource": "DEBIAN",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3979"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/jpadilla/pyjwt/pull/277",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "https://github.com/jpadilla/pyjwt/pull/277"
}
]
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "7cd4c57f-0a88-4dda-be53-70336b413766",
"assignerShortName": "duo",
"cveId": "CVE-2017-11424",
"datePublished": "2017-08-24T16:00:00",
"dateReserved": "2017-07-18T00:00:00",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-05T18:12:39.550Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"fkie_nvd": {
"configurations": "[{\"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:pyjwt_project:pyjwt:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"versionEndIncluding\": \"1.5.0\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"2ED2491D-3EA6-4348-BABC-A1752F717260\"}]}]}, {\"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:8.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"C11E6FB0-C8C0-4527-9AA0-CB9B316F8F43\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:9.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"DEECE5FC-CACF-4496-A3E7-164736409252\"}]}]}]",
"descriptions": "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"In PyJWT 1.5.0 and below the `invalid_strings` check in `HMACAlgorithm.prepare_key` does not account for all PEM encoded public keys. Specifically, the PKCS1 PEM encoded format would be allowed because it is prefaced with the string `-----BEGIN RSA PUBLIC KEY-----` which is not accounted for. This enables symmetric/asymmetric key confusion attacks against users using the PKCS1 PEM encoded public keys, which would allow an attacker to craft JWTs from scratch.\"}, {\"lang\": \"es\", \"value\": \"En PyJWT 1.5.0 y anteriores, la comprobaci\\u00f3n `invalid_strings` en `HMACAlgorithm.prepare_key` no da cuenta de todas las claves p\\u00fablicas codificadas PEM. Espec\\u00edficamente, el formato codificado PKCS1 PEM se permitir\\u00eda porque va precedido por la cadena `-----BEGIN RSA PUBLIC KEY-----`, la cual no se tiene en cuenta. Esto permite ataques sim\\u00e9tricos/asim\\u00e9tricos de confusi\\u00f3n de claves contra usuarios que empleen las claves p\\u00fablicas PKCS1 PEM, que permitir\\u00edan que un atacante manipulase JWT desde cero.\"}]",
"id": "CVE-2017-11424",
"lastModified": "2024-11-21T03:07:46.073",
"metrics": "{\"cvssMetricV30\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"3.0\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N\", \"baseScore\": 7.5, \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\"}, \"exploitabilityScore\": 3.9, \"impactScore\": 3.6}], \"cvssMetricV2\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"2.0\", \"vectorString\": \"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N\", \"baseScore\": 5.0, \"accessVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"accessComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"authentication\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"integrityImpact\": \"PARTIAL\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\"}, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"exploitabilityScore\": 10.0, \"impactScore\": 2.9, \"acInsufInfo\": false, \"obtainAllPrivilege\": false, \"obtainUserPrivilege\": false, \"obtainOtherPrivilege\": false, \"userInteractionRequired\": false}]}",
"published": "2017-08-24T16:29:00.197",
"references": "[{\"url\": \"http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3979\", \"source\": \"security@duo.com\", \"tags\": [\"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/jpadilla/pyjwt/pull/277\", \"source\": \"security@duo.com\", \"tags\": [\"Issue Tracking\", \"Patch\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3979\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/jpadilla/pyjwt/pull/277\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Issue Tracking\", \"Patch\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}]",
"sourceIdentifier": "security@duo.com",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": "[{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"NVD-CWE-noinfo\"}]}]"
},
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2017-11424\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security@duo.com\",\"published\":\"2017-08-24T16:29:00.197\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-04-20T01:37:25.860\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Deferred\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"In PyJWT 1.5.0 and below the `invalid_strings` check in `HMACAlgorithm.prepare_key` does not account for all PEM encoded public keys. Specifically, the PKCS1 PEM encoded format would be allowed because it is prefaced with the string `-----BEGIN RSA PUBLIC KEY-----` which is not accounted for. This enables symmetric/asymmetric key confusion attacks against users using the PKCS1 PEM encoded public keys, which would allow an attacker to craft JWTs from scratch.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"En PyJWT 1.5.0 y anteriores, la comprobaci\u00f3n `invalid_strings` en `HMACAlgorithm.prepare_key` no da cuenta de todas las claves p\u00fablicas codificadas PEM. Espec\u00edficamente, el formato codificado PKCS1 PEM se permitir\u00eda porque va precedido por la cadena `-----BEGIN RSA PUBLIC KEY-----`, la cual no se tiene en cuenta. Esto permite ataques sim\u00e9tricos/asim\u00e9tricos de confusi\u00f3n de claves contra usuarios que empleen las claves p\u00fablicas PKCS1 PEM, que permitir\u00edan que un atacante manipulase JWT desde cero.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV30\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N\",\"baseScore\":7.5,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":3.6}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N\",\"baseScore\":5.0,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":10.0,\"impactScore\":2.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"NVD-CWE-noinfo\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:pyjwt_project:pyjwt:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndIncluding\":\"1.5.0\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"2ED2491D-3EA6-4348-BABC-A1752F717260\"}]}]},{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:8.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"C11E6FB0-C8C0-4527-9AA0-CB9B316F8F43\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:9.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"DEECE5FC-CACF-4496-A3E7-164736409252\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3979\",\"source\":\"security@duo.com\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/jpadilla/pyjwt/pull/277\",\"source\":\"security@duo.com\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Patch\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3979\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/jpadilla/pyjwt/pull/277\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Patch\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]}]}}"
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…