CVE-2017-11654 (GCVE-0-2017-11654)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2017-07-26 14:00 – Updated: 2024-08-05 18:12
VLAI?
Summary
An out-of-bounds read and write flaw was found in the way SIPcrack 0.2 processed SIP traffic, because 0x00 termination of a payload array was mishandled. A remote attacker could potentially use this flaw to crash the sipdump process by generating specially crafted SIP traffic.
Severity ?
No CVSS data available.
CWE
  • n/a
Assigner
References
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-05T18:12:40.569Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/07/26/1"
          },
          {
            "name": "100023",
            "tags": [
              "vdb-entry",
              "x_refsource_BID",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/100023"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2017-07-26T00:00:00",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "An out-of-bounds read and write flaw was found in the way SIPcrack 0.2 processed SIP traffic, because 0x00 termination of a payload array was mishandled. A remote attacker could potentially use this flaw to crash the sipdump process by generating specially crafted SIP traffic."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "n/a",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2017-08-01T09:57:01",
        "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
        "shortName": "mitre"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/07/26/1"
        },
        {
          "name": "100023",
          "tags": [
            "vdb-entry",
            "x_refsource_BID"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/100023"
        }
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2017-11654",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "n/a",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "n/a"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "An out-of-bounds read and write flaw was found in the way SIPcrack 0.2 processed SIP traffic, because 0x00 termination of a payload array was mishandled. A remote attacker could potentially use this flaw to crash the sipdump process by generating specially crafted SIP traffic."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "n/a"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/07/26/1",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/07/26/1"
            },
            {
              "name": "100023",
              "refsource": "BID",
              "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/100023"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
    "assignerShortName": "mitre",
    "cveId": "CVE-2017-11654",
    "datePublished": "2017-07-26T14:00:00",
    "dateReserved": "2017-07-26T00:00:00",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-05T18:12:40.569Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "fkie_nvd": {
      "configurations": "[{\"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:sipcrack_project:sipcrack:0.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"A066A372-D163-4F3F-99DD-70FF98417C1D\"}]}]}]",
      "descriptions": "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"An out-of-bounds read and write flaw was found in the way SIPcrack 0.2 processed SIP traffic, because 0x00 termination of a payload array was mishandled. A remote attacker could potentially use this flaw to crash the sipdump process by generating specially crafted SIP traffic.\"}, {\"lang\": \"es\", \"value\": \"Se encontr\\u00f3 un fallo de lectura y escritura fuera de l\\u00edmites en la manera en que SIPcrack versi\\u00f3n 0.2 proces\\u00f3 el tr\\u00e1fico SIP, porque la terminaci\\u00f3n 0x00 de una matriz de carga \\u00fatil se manej\\u00f3 inapropiadamente. Un atacante remoto potencialmente podr\\u00eda  usar este fallo para bloquear el proceso sipdump mediante la generaci\\u00f3n de tr\\u00e1fico SIP especialmente creado.\"}]",
      "id": "CVE-2017-11654",
      "lastModified": "2024-11-21T03:08:14.303",
      "metrics": "{\"cvssMetricV31\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"3.1\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H\", \"baseScore\": 5.9, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"attackComplexity\": \"HIGH\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}, \"exploitabilityScore\": 2.2, \"impactScore\": 3.6}], \"cvssMetricV2\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"2.0\", \"vectorString\": \"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P\", \"baseScore\": 4.3, \"accessVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"accessComplexity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"authentication\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"PARTIAL\"}, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"exploitabilityScore\": 8.6, \"impactScore\": 2.9, \"acInsufInfo\": false, \"obtainAllPrivilege\": false, \"obtainUserPrivilege\": false, \"obtainOtherPrivilege\": false, \"userInteractionRequired\": false}]}",
      "published": "2017-07-26T14:29:00.177",
      "references": "[{\"url\": \"http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/07/26/1\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\", \"tags\": [\"Exploit\", \"Mailing List\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/100023\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\", \"tags\": [\"Broken Link\", \"Third Party Advisory\", \"VDB Entry\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/07/26/1\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Exploit\", \"Mailing List\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/100023\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Broken Link\", \"Third Party Advisory\", \"VDB Entry\"]}]",
      "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
      "vulnStatus": "Modified",
      "weaknesses": "[{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CWE-125\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CWE-787\"}]}]"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2017-11654\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2017-07-26T14:29:00.177\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-04-20T01:37:25.860\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Deferred\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"An out-of-bounds read and write flaw was found in the way SIPcrack 0.2 processed SIP traffic, because 0x00 termination of a payload array was mishandled. A remote attacker could potentially use this flaw to crash the sipdump process by generating specially crafted SIP traffic.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Se encontr\u00f3 un fallo de lectura y escritura fuera de l\u00edmites en la manera en que SIPcrack versi\u00f3n 0.2 proces\u00f3 el tr\u00e1fico SIP, porque la terminaci\u00f3n 0x00 de una matriz de carga \u00fatil se manej\u00f3 inapropiadamente. Un atacante remoto potencialmente podr\u00eda  usar este fallo para bloquear el proceso sipdump mediante la generaci\u00f3n de tr\u00e1fico SIP especialmente creado.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H\",\"baseScore\":5.9,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.2,\"impactScore\":3.6}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P\",\"baseScore\":4.3,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":8.6,\"impactScore\":2.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-125\"},{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-787\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:sipcrack_project:sipcrack:0.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"A066A372-D163-4F3F-99DD-70FF98417C1D\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/07/26/1\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Mailing List\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/100023\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Broken Link\",\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/07/26/1\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Mailing List\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/100023\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Broken Link\",\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]}]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…