CVE-2018-16567 (GCVE-0-2018-16567)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2019-04-17 13:34 – Updated: 2019-04-17 13:34DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none
Show details on NVD website{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2019-04-17T13:34:21.000Z",
"orgId": "cec7a2ec-15b4-4faf-bd53-b40f371f3a77",
"shortName": "siemens"
},
"rejectedReasons": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none"
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "cec7a2ec-15b4-4faf-bd53-b40f371f3a77",
"assignerShortName": "siemens",
"cveId": "CVE-2018-16567",
"datePublished": "2019-04-17T13:34:21.000Z",
"dateRejected": "2019-04-17T13:34:21.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2018-09-06T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2019-04-17T13:34:21.000Z",
"state": "REJECTED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.0",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"fkie_nvd": {
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none"
}
],
"id": "CVE-2018-16567",
"lastModified": "2023-11-07T02:53:50.627",
"published": "2019-04-17T14:15:10.197",
"sourceIdentifier": "productcert@siemens.com",
"vulnStatus": "Rejected"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none"
}
],
"id": "CVE-2018-16567",
"lastModified": "2023-11-07T02:53:50.627",
"metrics": {},
"published": "2019-04-17T14:15:10.197",
"references": [],
"sourceIdentifier": "productcert@siemens.com",
"vulnStatus": "Rejected"
}
}
}
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.