CVE-2021-35936
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2021-08-16 07:25
Modified
2024-08-04 00:40
Severity ?
EPSS score ?
Summary
No Authentication on Logging Server
References
▼ | URL | Tags | |
---|---|---|---|
security@apache.org | https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r53d6bd7b0a66f92ddaf1313282f10fec802e71246606dd30c16536df%40%3Cusers.airflow.apache.org%3E | Mailing List, Vendor Advisory |
Impacted products
▼ | Vendor | Product |
---|---|---|
Apache Software Foundation | Apache Airflow |
{ "containers": { "adp": [ { "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T00:40:47.453Z", "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "shortName": "CVE" }, "references": [ { "tags": [ "x_refsource_MISC", "x_transferred" ], "url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r53d6bd7b0a66f92ddaf1313282f10fec802e71246606dd30c16536df%40%3Cusers.airflow.apache.org%3E" } ], "title": "CVE Program Container" } ], "cna": { "affected": [ { "product": "Apache Airflow", "vendor": "Apache Software Foundation", "versions": [ { "lessThan": "2.1.2", "status": "affected", "version": "Apache Airflow", "versionType": "custom" } ] } ], "credits": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "Apache Airflow would like to thank Dolev Farhi for reporting this issue." } ], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "If remote logging is not used, the worker (in the case of CeleryExecutor) or the scheduler (in the case of LocalExecutor) runs a Flask logging server and is listening on a specific port and also binds on 0.0.0.0 by default. This logging server had no authentication and allows reading log files of DAG jobs. This issue affects Apache Airflow \u003c 2.1.2." } ], "problemTypes": [ { "descriptions": [ { "cweId": "CWE-200", "description": "CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor", "lang": "en", "type": "CWE" } ] } ], "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2021-08-16T07:25:11", "orgId": "f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09", "shortName": "apache" }, "references": [ { "tags": [ "x_refsource_MISC" ], "url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r53d6bd7b0a66f92ddaf1313282f10fec802e71246606dd30c16536df%40%3Cusers.airflow.apache.org%3E" } ], "source": { "discovery": "UNKNOWN" }, "title": "No Authentication on Logging Server", "workarounds": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "Use remote logging with GCS, S3, Elasticsearch etc. This is recommended for production environments.\n\nAnd do not publicly expose any other ports apart from Webserver port, Flower port etc." } ], "x_generator": { "engine": "Vulnogram 0.0.9" }, "x_legacyV4Record": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "security@apache.org", "ID": "CVE-2021-35936", "STATE": "PUBLIC", "TITLE": "No Authentication on Logging Server" }, "affects": { "vendor": { "vendor_data": [ { "product": { "product_data": [ { "product_name": "Apache Airflow", "version": { "version_data": [ { "version_affected": "\u003c", "version_name": "Apache Airflow", "version_value": "2.1.2" } ] } } ] }, "vendor_name": "Apache Software Foundation" } ] } }, "credit": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "Apache Airflow would like to thank Dolev Farhi for reporting this issue." } ], "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "If remote logging is not used, the worker (in the case of CeleryExecutor) or the scheduler (in the case of LocalExecutor) runs a Flask logging server and is listening on a specific port and also binds on 0.0.0.0 by default. This logging server had no authentication and allows reading log files of DAG jobs. This issue affects Apache Airflow \u003c 2.1.2." } ] }, "generator": { "engine": "Vulnogram 0.0.9" }, "impact": [ {} ], "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r53d6bd7b0a66f92ddaf1313282f10fec802e71246606dd30c16536df%40%3Cusers.airflow.apache.org%3E", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r53d6bd7b0a66f92ddaf1313282f10fec802e71246606dd30c16536df%40%3Cusers.airflow.apache.org%3E" } ] }, "source": { "discovery": "UNKNOWN" }, "work_around": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "Use remote logging with GCS, S3, Elasticsearch etc. This is recommended for production environments.\n\nAnd do not publicly expose any other ports apart from Webserver port, Flower port etc." } ] } } }, "cveMetadata": { "assignerOrgId": "f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09", "assignerShortName": "apache", "cveId": "CVE-2021-35936", "datePublished": "2021-08-16T07:25:11", "dateReserved": "2021-06-29T00:00:00", "dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T00:40:47.453Z", "state": "PUBLISHED" }, "dataType": "CVE_RECORD", "dataVersion": "5.1", "meta": { "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2021-35936\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security@apache.org\",\"published\":\"2021-08-16T08:15:11.530\",\"lastModified\":\"2022-10-07T20:22:24.763\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Analyzed\",\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"If remote logging is not used, the worker (in the case of CeleryExecutor) or the scheduler (in the case of LocalExecutor) runs a Flask logging server and is listening on a specific port and also binds on 0.0.0.0 by default. This logging server had no authentication and allows reading log files of DAG jobs. This issue affects Apache Airflow \u003c 2.1.2.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Si no es usado el registro remoto, el trabajador (en el caso de CeleryExecutor) o el planificador (en el caso de LocalExecutor) ejecuta un servidor de registro Flask y est\u00e1 escuchando en un puerto espec\u00edfico y tambi\u00e9n se vincula en 0.0.0.0 por defecto. Este servidor de registro no presenta autenticaci\u00f3n y permite leer los archivos de registro de los trabajos DAG. Este problema afecta a Apache Airflow versiones anteriores a 2.1.2.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"baseScore\":5.3,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":1.4}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N\",\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"baseScore\":5.0},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":10.0,\"impactScore\":2.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-306\"}]},{\"source\":\"security@apache.org\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-200\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:apache:airflow:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"2.1.2\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"410C1DAD-EE40-4F94-8DF6-25B94961F5FD\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r53d6bd7b0a66f92ddaf1313282f10fec802e71246606dd30c16536df%40%3Cusers.airflow.apache.org%3E\",\"source\":\"security@apache.org\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]}]}}" } }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.