CVE-2022-40468
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2022-09-19 00:00
Modified
2024-08-03 12:21
Severity ?
EPSS score ?
Summary
Potential leak of left-over heap data if custom error page templates containing special non-standard variables are used. Tinyproxy commit 84f203f and earlier use uninitialized buffers in process_request() function.
References
{ "containers": { "adp": [ { "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T12:21:45.578Z", "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "shortName": "CVE" }, "references": [ { "tags": [ "x_transferred" ], "url": "https://github.com/tinyproxy/tinyproxy" }, { "tags": [ "x_transferred" ], "url": "https://github.com/tinyproxy/tinyproxy/blob/84f203fb1c4733608c7283bbe794005a469c4b00/src/reqs.c#L346" }, { "tags": [ "x_transferred" ], "url": "https://github.com/tinyproxy/tinyproxy/issues/457" }, { "tags": [ "x_transferred" ], "url": "https://github.com/tinyproxy/tinyproxy/issues/457#issuecomment-1264176815" }, { "name": "GLSA-202305-27", "tags": [ "vendor-advisory", "x_transferred" ], "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202305-27" } ], "title": "CVE Program Container" } ], "cna": { "affected": [ { "product": "n/a", "vendor": "n/a", "versions": [ { "status": "affected", "version": "n/a" } ] } ], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "Potential leak of left-over heap data if custom error page templates containing special non-standard variables are used. Tinyproxy commit 84f203f and earlier use uninitialized buffers in process_request() function." } ], "problemTypes": [ { "descriptions": [ { "description": "n/a", "lang": "en", "type": "text" } ] } ], "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2023-05-21T00:00:00", "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca", "shortName": "mitre" }, "references": [ { "url": "https://github.com/tinyproxy/tinyproxy" }, { "url": "https://github.com/tinyproxy/tinyproxy/blob/84f203fb1c4733608c7283bbe794005a469c4b00/src/reqs.c#L346" }, { "url": "https://github.com/tinyproxy/tinyproxy/issues/457" }, { "url": "https://github.com/tinyproxy/tinyproxy/issues/457#issuecomment-1264176815" }, { "name": "GLSA-202305-27", "tags": [ "vendor-advisory" ], "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202305-27" } ] } }, "cveMetadata": { "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca", "assignerShortName": "mitre", "cveId": "CVE-2022-40468", "datePublished": "2022-09-19T00:00:00", "dateReserved": "2022-09-11T00:00:00", "dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T12:21:45.578Z", "state": "PUBLISHED" }, "dataType": "CVE_RECORD", "dataVersion": "5.1", "vulnerability-lookup:meta": { "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2022-40468\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2022-09-19T17:15:14.700\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T07:21:25.437\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Potential leak of left-over heap data if custom error page templates containing special non-standard variables are used. Tinyproxy commit 84f203f and earlier use uninitialized buffers in process_request() function.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Posible fuga de datos sobrantes de la pila si se utilizan plantillas de p\u00e1ginas de error personalizadas que contienen variables especiales no est\u00e1ndar. El commit 84f203f de Tinyproxy y los anteriores utilizan b\u00faferes no inicializados en la funci\u00f3n process_request()\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N\",\"baseScore\":7.5,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":3.6}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-1188\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:tinyproxy_project:tinyproxy:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndIncluding\":\"1.11.1\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"3E51FD82-DAE3-49BD-A817-91A131CE6525\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/tinyproxy/tinyproxy\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/tinyproxy/tinyproxy/blob/84f203fb1c4733608c7283bbe794005a469c4b00/src/reqs.c#L346\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/tinyproxy/tinyproxy/issues/457\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/tinyproxy/tinyproxy/issues/457#issuecomment-1264176815\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202305-27\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/tinyproxy/tinyproxy\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/tinyproxy/tinyproxy/blob/84f203fb1c4733608c7283bbe794005a469c4b00/src/reqs.c#L346\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/tinyproxy/tinyproxy/issues/457\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/tinyproxy/tinyproxy/issues/457#issuecomment-1264176815\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202305-27\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}]}}" } }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.