CVE-2023-3446
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2023-07-19 11:31
Modified
2024-10-14 14:55
Severity ?
Summary
Excessive time spent checking DH keys and parameters
References
openssl-security@openssl.orghttps://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=1fa20cf2f506113c761777127a38bce5068740ebMailing List, Patch, Vendor Advisory
openssl-security@openssl.orghttps://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=8780a896543a654e757db1b9396383f9d8095528Mailing List, Patch, Vendor Advisory
openssl-security@openssl.orghttps://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=9a0a4d3c1e7138915563c0df4fe6a3f9377b839cBroken Link, Vendor Advisory
openssl-security@openssl.orghttps://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=fc9867c1e03c22ebf56943be205202e576aabf23Mailing List, Patch, Vendor Advisory
openssl-security@openssl.orghttps://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230719.txtVendor Advisory
Impacted products
OpenSSLOpenSSL
Show details on NVD website

To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T06:55:03.577Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
            "tags": [
              "vendor-advisory",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230719.txt"
          },
          {
            "name": "3.1.2 git commit",
            "tags": [
              "patch",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=fc9867c1e03c22ebf56943be205202e576aabf23"
          },
          {
            "name": "3.0.10 git commit",
            "tags": [
              "patch",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=1fa20cf2f506113c761777127a38bce5068740eb"
          },
          {
            "name": "1.1.1v git commit",
            "tags": [
              "patch",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=8780a896543a654e757db1b9396383f9d8095528"
          },
          {
            "name": "1.0.2zi patch (premium)",
            "tags": [
              "patch",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=9a0a4d3c1e7138915563c0df4fe6a3f9377b839c"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/07/19/4"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/07/19/5"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/07/19/6"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/07/31/1"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230803-0011/"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/08/msg00019.html"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-08"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/05/16/1"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "OpenSSL",
          "vendor": "OpenSSL",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "3.1.2",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "3.1.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "3.0.10",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "3.0.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "1.1.1v",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "1.1.1",
              "versionType": "custom"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "1.0.2zi",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "1.0.2",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "reporter",
          "user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
          "value": "OSSfuzz"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
          "value": "Matt Caswell"
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2023-07-13T00:00:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "Issue summary: Checking excessively long DH keys or parameters may be very slow.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eImpact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_check(), DH_check_ex()\u003cbr\u003eor EVP_PKEY_param_check() to check a DH key or DH parameters may experience long\u003cbr\u003edelays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained\u003cbr\u003efrom an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe function DH_check() performs various checks on DH parameters. One of those\u003cbr\u003echecks confirms that the modulus (\u0027p\u0027 parameter) is not too large. Trying to use\u003cbr\u003ea very large modulus is slow and OpenSSL will not normally use a modulus which\u003cbr\u003eis over 10,000 bits in length.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eHowever the DH_check() function checks numerous aspects of the key or parameters\u003cbr\u003ethat have been supplied. Some of those checks use the supplied modulus value\u003cbr\u003eeven if it has already been found to be too large.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eAn application that calls DH_check() and supplies a key or parameters obtained\u003cbr\u003efrom an untrusted source could be vulernable to a Denial of Service attack.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe function DH_check() is itself called by a number of other OpenSSL functions.\u003cbr\u003eAn application calling any of those other functions may similarly be affected.\u003cbr\u003eThe other functions affected by this are DH_check_ex() and\u003cbr\u003eEVP_PKEY_param_check().\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eAlso vulnerable are the OpenSSL dhparam and pkeyparam command line applications\u003cbr\u003ewhen using the \u0027-check\u0027 option.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this issue."
            }
          ],
          "value": "Issue summary: Checking excessively long DH keys or parameters may be very slow.\n\nImpact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_check(), DH_check_ex()\nor EVP_PKEY_param_check() to check a DH key or DH parameters may experience long\ndelays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained\nfrom an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service.\n\nThe function DH_check() performs various checks on DH parameters. One of those\nchecks confirms that the modulus (\u0027p\u0027 parameter) is not too large. Trying to use\na very large modulus is slow and OpenSSL will not normally use a modulus which\nis over 10,000 bits in length.\n\nHowever the DH_check() function checks numerous aspects of the key or parameters\nthat have been supplied. Some of those checks use the supplied modulus value\neven if it has already been found to be too large.\n\nAn application that calls DH_check() and supplies a key or parameters obtained\nfrom an untrusted source could be vulernable to a Denial of Service attack.\n\nThe function DH_check() is itself called by a number of other OpenSSL functions.\nAn application calling any of those other functions may similarly be affected.\nThe other functions affected by this are DH_check_ex() and\nEVP_PKEY_param_check().\n\nAlso vulnerable are the OpenSSL dhparam and pkeyparam command line applications\nwhen using the \u0027-check\u0027 option.\n\nThe OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.\nThe OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this issue."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "format": "other",
          "other": {
            "content": {
              "text": "Low"
            },
            "type": "https://www.openssl.org/policies/secpolicy.html"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-606",
              "description": "CWE-606 Unchecked Input for Loop Condition",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2024-10-14T14:55:47.238Z",
        "orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
        "shortName": "openssl"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230719.txt"
        },
        {
          "name": "3.1.2 git commit",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=fc9867c1e03c22ebf56943be205202e576aabf23"
        },
        {
          "name": "3.0.10 git commit",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=1fa20cf2f506113c761777127a38bce5068740eb"
        },
        {
          "name": "1.1.1v git commit",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=8780a896543a654e757db1b9396383f9d8095528"
        },
        {
          "name": "1.0.2zi patch (premium)",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=9a0a4d3c1e7138915563c0df4fe6a3f9377b839c"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "Excessive time spent checking DH keys and parameters",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
    "assignerShortName": "openssl",
    "cveId": "CVE-2023-3446",
    "datePublished": "2023-07-19T11:31:34.994Z",
    "dateReserved": "2023-06-28T14:21:39.968Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-10-14T14:55:47.238Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "meta": {
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2023-3446\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"openssl-security@openssl.org\",\"published\":\"2023-07-19T12:15:10.003\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-10-14T15:15:11.730\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Issue summary: Checking excessively long DH keys or parameters may be very slow.\\n\\nImpact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_check(), DH_check_ex()\\nor EVP_PKEY_param_check() to check a DH key or DH parameters may experience long\\ndelays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained\\nfrom an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service.\\n\\nThe function DH_check() performs various checks on DH parameters. One of those\\nchecks confirms that the modulus (\u0027p\u0027 parameter) is not too large. Trying to use\\na very large modulus is slow and OpenSSL will not normally use a modulus which\\nis over 10,000 bits in length.\\n\\nHowever the DH_check() function checks numerous aspects of the key or parameters\\nthat have been supplied. Some of those checks use the supplied modulus value\\neven if it has already been found to be too large.\\n\\nAn application that calls DH_check() and supplies a key or parameters obtained\\nfrom an untrusted source could be vulernable to a Denial of Service attack.\\n\\nThe function DH_check() is itself called by a number of other OpenSSL functions.\\nAn application calling any of those other functions may similarly be affected.\\nThe other functions affected by this are DH_check_ex() and\\nEVP_PKEY_param_check().\\n\\nAlso vulnerable are the OpenSSL dhparam and pkeyparam command line applications\\nwhen using the \u0027-check\u0027 option.\\n\\nThe OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.\\nThe OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this issue.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"baseScore\":5.3,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":1.4}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-1333\"}]},{\"source\":\"openssl-security@openssl.org\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-606\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:1.0.2:-:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"CF0E6EB1-D656-458E-82B6-8C1ABDC13CB9\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:1.1.1:-:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"A8C84061-63BE-49F6-B2F0-D96847E755E0\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.0.0:-:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"07D64A21-359E-40B7-8636-7E76D7466263\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.1.0:-:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"0CAAEE49-4FD0-4162-B635-4488BEC5DDC9\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.1.1:-:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"69EAFE3B-C2C7-4092-92A8-529512438B06\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=1fa20cf2f506113c761777127a38bce5068740eb\",\"source\":\"openssl-security@openssl.org\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\",\"Patch\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=8780a896543a654e757db1b9396383f9d8095528\",\"source\":\"openssl-security@openssl.org\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\",\"Patch\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=9a0a4d3c1e7138915563c0df4fe6a3f9377b839c\",\"source\":\"openssl-security@openssl.org\",\"tags\":[\"Broken Link\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=fc9867c1e03c22ebf56943be205202e576aabf23\",\"source\":\"openssl-security@openssl.org\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\",\"Patch\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230719.txt\",\"source\":\"openssl-security@openssl.org\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]}]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.