CVE-2023-44399 (GCVE-0-2023-44399)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2023-10-10 16:55 – Updated: 2024-09-19 14:18
VLAI
Title
ZITADEL's password reset does not respect the "Ignoring unknown usernames" setting
Summary
ZITADEL provides identity infrastructure. In versions 2.37.2 and prior, ZITADEL administrators can enable a setting called "Ignoring unknown usernames" which helps mitigate attacks that try to guess/enumerate usernames. While this settings was properly working during the authentication process it did not work correctly on the password reset flow. This meant that even if this feature was active that an attacker could use the password reset function to verify if an account exist within ZITADEL. This bug has been patched in versions 2.37.3 and 2.38.0. No known workarounds are available.
Severity
5.3 (Medium)
CWE
- CWE-640 - Weak Password Recovery Mechanism for Forgotten Password
Assigner
References
3 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/security/advis… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/releases/tag/v2.37.3 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/releases/tag/v2.38.0 | x_refsource_MISC |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T20:07:32.937Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/security/advisories/GHSA-v683-rcxx-vpff",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/security/advisories/GHSA-v683-rcxx-vpff"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/releases/tag/v2.37.3",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/releases/tag/v2.37.3"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/releases/tag/v2.38.0",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/releases/tag/v2.38.0"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2023-44399",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-09-19T14:17:59.037219Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-09-19T14:18:10.146Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "zitadel",
"vendor": "zitadel",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 2.37.3"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "ZITADEL provides identity infrastructure. In versions 2.37.2 and prior, ZITADEL administrators can enable a setting called \"Ignoring unknown usernames\" which helps mitigate attacks that try to guess/enumerate usernames. While this settings was properly working during the authentication process it did not work correctly on the password reset flow. This meant that even if this feature was active that an attacker could use the password reset function to verify if an account exist within ZITADEL. This bug has been patched in versions 2.37.3 and 2.38.0. No known workarounds are available."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-640",
"description": "CWE-640: Weak Password Recovery Mechanism for Forgotten Password",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2023-10-10T16:55:45.309Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/security/advisories/GHSA-v683-rcxx-vpff",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/security/advisories/GHSA-v683-rcxx-vpff"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/releases/tag/v2.37.3",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/releases/tag/v2.37.3"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/releases/tag/v2.38.0",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/releases/tag/v2.38.0"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-v683-rcxx-vpff",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "ZITADEL\u0027s password reset does not respect the \"Ignoring unknown usernames\" setting"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2023-44399",
"datePublished": "2023-10-10T16:55:45.309Z",
"dateReserved": "2023-09-28T17:56:32.614Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-09-19T14:18:10.146Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2023-44399",
"date": "2026-05-30",
"epss": "0.00352",
"percentile": "0.5788"
},
"fkie_nvd": {
"configurations": "[{\"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:zitadel:zitadel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"versionEndIncluding\": \"2.37.2\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"945BD332-6A49-4ACD-8E01-583EFD78B8BA\"}]}]}]",
"descriptions": "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"ZITADEL provides identity infrastructure. In versions 2.37.2 and prior, ZITADEL administrators can enable a setting called \\\"Ignoring unknown usernames\\\" which helps mitigate attacks that try to guess/enumerate usernames. While this settings was properly working during the authentication process it did not work correctly on the password reset flow. This meant that even if this feature was active that an attacker could use the password reset function to verify if an account exist within ZITADEL. This bug has been patched in versions 2.37.3 and 2.38.0. No known workarounds are available.\"}, {\"lang\": \"es\", \"value\": \"ZITADEL proporciona infraestructura de identidad. En las versiones 2.37.2 y anteriores, los administradores de ZITADEL pueden habilitar una configuraci\\u00f3n llamada \\\"Ignoring unknown usernames\\\" que ayuda a mitigar los ataques que intentan adivinar/enumerar nombres de usuario. Si bien esta configuraci\\u00f3n funcion\\u00f3 correctamente durante el proceso de autenticaci\\u00f3n, no funcion\\u00f3 correctamente en el flujo de restablecimiento de contrase\\u00f1a. Esto significaba que incluso si esta funci\\u00f3n estuviera activa, un atacante podr\\u00eda usar la funci\\u00f3n de restablecimiento de contrase\\u00f1a para verificar si existe una cuenta dentro de ZITADEL. Este error se ha corregido en las versiones 2.37.3 y 2.38.0. No hay workarounds conocidos disponibles.\"}]",
"id": "CVE-2023-44399",
"lastModified": "2024-11-21T08:25:49.450",
"metrics": "{\"cvssMetricV31\": [{\"source\": \"security-advisories@github.com\", \"type\": \"Secondary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"3.1\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N\", \"baseScore\": 5.3, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"LOW\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\"}, \"exploitabilityScore\": 3.9, \"impactScore\": 1.4}, {\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"3.1\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N\", \"baseScore\": 5.3, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"LOW\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\"}, \"exploitabilityScore\": 3.9, \"impactScore\": 1.4}]}",
"published": "2023-10-10T17:15:13.107",
"references": "[{\"url\": \"https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/releases/tag/v2.37.3\", \"source\": \"security-advisories@github.com\", \"tags\": [\"Release Notes\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/releases/tag/v2.38.0\", \"source\": \"security-advisories@github.com\", \"tags\": [\"Release Notes\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/security/advisories/GHSA-v683-rcxx-vpff\", \"source\": \"security-advisories@github.com\", \"tags\": [\"Vendor Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/releases/tag/v2.37.3\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Release Notes\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/releases/tag/v2.38.0\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Release Notes\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/security/advisories/GHSA-v683-rcxx-vpff\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Vendor Advisory\"]}]",
"sourceIdentifier": "security-advisories@github.com",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": "[{\"source\": \"security-advisories@github.com\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CWE-640\"}]}]"
},
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2023-44399\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"published\":\"2023-10-10T17:15:13.107\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T08:25:49.450\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"ZITADEL provides identity infrastructure. In versions 2.37.2 and prior, ZITADEL administrators can enable a setting called \\\"Ignoring unknown usernames\\\" which helps mitigate attacks that try to guess/enumerate usernames. While this settings was properly working during the authentication process it did not work correctly on the password reset flow. This meant that even if this feature was active that an attacker could use the password reset function to verify if an account exist within ZITADEL. This bug has been patched in versions 2.37.3 and 2.38.0. No known workarounds are available.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"ZITADEL proporciona infraestructura de identidad. En las versiones 2.37.2 y anteriores, los administradores de ZITADEL pueden habilitar una configuraci\u00f3n llamada \\\"Ignoring unknown usernames\\\" que ayuda a mitigar los ataques que intentan adivinar/enumerar nombres de usuario. Si bien esta configuraci\u00f3n funcion\u00f3 correctamente durante el proceso de autenticaci\u00f3n, no funcion\u00f3 correctamente en el flujo de restablecimiento de contrase\u00f1a. Esto significaba que incluso si esta funci\u00f3n estuviera activa, un atacante podr\u00eda usar la funci\u00f3n de restablecimiento de contrase\u00f1a para verificar si existe una cuenta dentro de ZITADEL. Este error se ha corregido en las versiones 2.37.3 y 2.38.0. No hay workarounds conocidos disponibles.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N\",\"baseScore\":5.3,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":1.4},{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N\",\"baseScore\":5.3,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":1.4}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-640\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:zitadel:zitadel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndIncluding\":\"2.37.2\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"945BD332-6A49-4ACD-8E01-583EFD78B8BA\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/releases/tag/v2.37.3\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"tags\":[\"Release Notes\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/releases/tag/v2.38.0\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"tags\":[\"Release Notes\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/security/advisories/GHSA-v683-rcxx-vpff\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/releases/tag/v2.37.3\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Release Notes\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/releases/tag/v2.38.0\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Release Notes\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/security/advisories/GHSA-v683-rcxx-vpff\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]}]}}",
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CVE Program Container\", \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/security/advisories/GHSA-v683-rcxx-vpff\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/security/advisories/GHSA-v683-rcxx-vpff\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_CONFIRM\", \"x_transferred\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/releases/tag/v2.37.3\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/releases/tag/v2.37.3\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\", \"x_transferred\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/releases/tag/v2.38.0\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/releases/tag/v2.38.0\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\", \"x_transferred\"]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"shortName\": \"CVE\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2024-08-02T20:07:32.937Z\"}}, {\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2023-44399\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"yes\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2024-09-19T14:17:59.037219Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2024-09-19T14:18:06.596Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"ZITADEL\u0027s password reset does not respect the \\\"Ignoring unknown usernames\\\" setting\", \"source\": {\"advisory\": \"GHSA-v683-rcxx-vpff\", \"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}, \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 5.3, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"LOW\"}}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"zitadel\", \"product\": \"zitadel\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003c 2.37.3\"}]}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/security/advisories/GHSA-v683-rcxx-vpff\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/security/advisories/GHSA-v683-rcxx-vpff\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_CONFIRM\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/releases/tag/v2.37.3\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/releases/tag/v2.37.3\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/releases/tag/v2.38.0\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/releases/tag/v2.38.0\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"ZITADEL provides identity infrastructure. In versions 2.37.2 and prior, ZITADEL administrators can enable a setting called \\\"Ignoring unknown usernames\\\" which helps mitigate attacks that try to guess/enumerate usernames. While this settings was properly working during the authentication process it did not work correctly on the password reset flow. This meant that even if this feature was active that an attacker could use the password reset function to verify if an account exist within ZITADEL. This bug has been patched in versions 2.37.3 and 2.38.0. No known workarounds are available.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-640\", \"description\": \"CWE-640: Weak Password Recovery Mechanism for Forgotten Password\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"shortName\": \"GitHub_M\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2023-10-10T16:55:45.309Z\"}}}",
"cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2023-44399\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2024-09-19T14:18:10.146Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2023-09-28T17:56:32.614Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"datePublished\": \"2023-10-10T16:55:45.309Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"GitHub_M\"}",
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…