Action not permitted
Modal body text goes here.
Modal Title
Modal Body
CVE-2023-52846 (GCVE-0-2023-52846)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2024-05-21 15:31 – Updated: 2026-08-05 09:11| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux |
Affected:
451d8123f89791bb628277c0bdb4cae34a3563e6 , < ddf4e04e946aaa6c458b8b6829617cc44af2bffd
(git)
Affected: 451d8123f89791bb628277c0bdb4cae34a3563e6 , < a1a485e45d24b1cd8fe834fd6f1b06e2903827da (git) Affected: 451d8123f89791bb628277c0bdb4cae34a3563e6 , < 6086258bd5ea7b5c706ff62da42b8e271b2401db (git) Affected: 451d8123f89791bb628277c0bdb4cae34a3563e6 , < 1787b9f0729d318d67cf7c5a95f0c3dba9a7cc18 (git) Affected: 451d8123f89791bb628277c0bdb4cae34a3563e6 , < d103fb6726904e353b4773188ee3d3acb4078363 (git) Affected: 451d8123f89791bb628277c0bdb4cae34a3563e6 , < 876f8ab52363f649bcc74072157dfd7adfbabc0d (git) |
guessed | |
| Linux | Linux |
Affected:
5.9
Unaffected: 0 , < 5.9 (semver) Unaffected: 5.10.201 , ≤ 5.10.* (semver) Unaffected: 5.15.139 , ≤ 5.15.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.1.63 , ≤ 6.1.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.5.12 , ≤ 6.5.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.6.2 , ≤ 6.6.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.7 , ≤ * (original_commit_for_fix) |
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2023-52846",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-05-22T18:22:52.516858Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-06-04T17:22:53.490Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T23:11:36.079Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ddf4e04e946aaa6c458b8b6829617cc44af2bffd"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a1a485e45d24b1cd8fe834fd6f1b06e2903827da"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6086258bd5ea7b5c706ff62da42b8e271b2401db"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1787b9f0729d318d67cf7c5a95f0c3dba9a7cc18"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d103fb6726904e353b4773188ee3d3acb4078363"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/876f8ab52363f649bcc74072157dfd7adfbabc0d"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"net/hsr/hsr_forward.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "ddf4e04e946aaa6c458b8b6829617cc44af2bffd",
"status": "affected",
"version": "451d8123f89791bb628277c0bdb4cae34a3563e6",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "a1a485e45d24b1cd8fe834fd6f1b06e2903827da",
"status": "affected",
"version": "451d8123f89791bb628277c0bdb4cae34a3563e6",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "6086258bd5ea7b5c706ff62da42b8e271b2401db",
"status": "affected",
"version": "451d8123f89791bb628277c0bdb4cae34a3563e6",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "1787b9f0729d318d67cf7c5a95f0c3dba9a7cc18",
"status": "affected",
"version": "451d8123f89791bb628277c0bdb4cae34a3563e6",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "d103fb6726904e353b4773188ee3d3acb4078363",
"status": "affected",
"version": "451d8123f89791bb628277c0bdb4cae34a3563e6",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "876f8ab52363f649bcc74072157dfd7adfbabc0d",
"status": "affected",
"version": "451d8123f89791bb628277c0bdb4cae34a3563e6",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"net/hsr/hsr_forward.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.9"
},
{
"lessThan": "5.9",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.201",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.139",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.63",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.5.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.5.12",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.2",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.7",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.10.201",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.9",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.139",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.9",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.63",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.9",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.5.12",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.9",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.2",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.9",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.7",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.9",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nhsr: Prevent use after free in prp_create_tagged_frame()\n\nThe prp_fill_rct() function can fail. In that situation, it frees the\nskb and returns NULL. Meanwhile on the success path, it returns the\noriginal skb. So it\u0027s straight forward to fix bug by using the returned\nvalue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "AV:A - PRP is an IEC 62439-3 L2 redundancy protocol used on industrial LANs; the vulnerable TX tagging path runs when the DANP master sends frames, which an adjacent peer can elicit (e.g. ARP replies) on the same LAN segment.\nAC:L - This is a deterministic use-after-free once padding allocation fails; an adjacent attacker can flood short-frame elicitation and stress GFP_ATOMIC memory, and UAF bugs are scored AC:L unless the attacker cannot influence the failure condition.\nPR:N - Triggering requires only unauthenticated L2 traffic on the PRP LAN (e.g. ARP requests that cause short replies through the master); no host account or capability is needed.\nUI:N - Once the PRP interface is up in its normal industrial deployment, attacker-sent LAN frames alone drive the reply/TX path into prp_create_tagged_frame() with no victim interaction.\nS:U - The UAF corrupts host kernel skb/heap state within the same OS security authority and does not cross a VM, IOMMU, or sandbox boundary.\nC:H - Use-after-free of the skb lets a reclaimed object be read through subsequent TX path accesses, enabling arbitrary kernel information disclosure per UAF guidance.\nI:H - hsr_forward_do() writes skb-\u003edev and hsr_xmit() mutates/transmits the freed skb, yielding heap corruption and write/control-flow primitives characteristic of exploitable kernel UAFs.\nA:H - Using the freed skb for TX and later free paths causes kernel oops/panic or double-free crashes, so availability impact is a full host denial of service."
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-05T09:11:39.752Z",
"orgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"shortName": "Linux"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ddf4e04e946aaa6c458b8b6829617cc44af2bffd"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a1a485e45d24b1cd8fe834fd6f1b06e2903827da"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6086258bd5ea7b5c706ff62da42b8e271b2401db"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1787b9f0729d318d67cf7c5a95f0c3dba9a7cc18"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d103fb6726904e353b4773188ee3d3acb4078363"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/876f8ab52363f649bcc74072157dfd7adfbabc0d"
}
],
"title": "hsr: Prevent use after free in prp_create_tagged_frame()",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "bippy-1.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"assignerShortName": "Linux",
"cveId": "CVE-2023-52846",
"datePublished": "2024-05-21T15:31:43.863Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-05-21T15:19:24.254Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-05T09:11:39.752Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2023-52846",
"date": "2026-09-27",
"epss": "0.00343",
"percentile": "0.25209"
},
"fkie_nvd": {
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "A30D430C-52B1-4816-90AC-B7A8073EA4B8",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.10.201",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.9",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "81424D14-B38F-47B3-A1B8-BC3B60BB96EA",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.139",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.11",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "80E1EA7E-2788-466C-9FFB-34AFA1B052F0",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.63",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.16",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "825F64D9-E99F-49AA-8A7B-EF7C2965C5B2",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.5.12",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.2",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "4CBFF885-A4D3-4F21-B6FD-4D770034C048",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.2",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.6",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nhsr: Prevent use after free in prp_create_tagged_frame()\n\nThe prp_fill_rct() function can fail. In that situation, it frees the\nskb and returns NULL. Meanwhile on the success path, it returns the\noriginal skb. So it\u0027s straight forward to fix bug by using the returned\nvalue."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": " En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: hsr: impedir el uso despu\u00e9s de liberar en prp_create_tagged_frame(). La funci\u00f3n prp_fill_rct() puede fallar. En esa situaci\u00f3n, libera el skb y devuelve NULL. Mientras tanto, en el camino hacia el \u00e9xito, devuelve el skb original. Por lo tanto, es sencillo corregir el error utilizando el valor devuelto."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2023-52846",
"lastModified": "2024-12-31T20:00:30.687",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"published": "2024-05-21T16:15:21.800",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1787b9f0729d318d67cf7c5a95f0c3dba9a7cc18"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6086258bd5ea7b5c706ff62da42b8e271b2401db"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/876f8ab52363f649bcc74072157dfd7adfbabc0d"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a1a485e45d24b1cd8fe834fd6f1b06e2903827da"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d103fb6726904e353b4773188ee3d3acb4078363"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ddf4e04e946aaa6c458b8b6829617cc44af2bffd"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1787b9f0729d318d67cf7c5a95f0c3dba9a7cc18"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6086258bd5ea7b5c706ff62da42b8e271b2401db"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/876f8ab52363f649bcc74072157dfd7adfbabc0d"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a1a485e45d24b1cd8fe834fd6f1b06e2903827da"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d103fb6726904e353b4773188ee3d3acb4078363"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ddf4e04e946aaa6c458b8b6829617cc44af2bffd"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-416"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"net/hsr/hsr_forward.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "ddf4e04e946aaa6c458b8b6829617cc44af2bffd",
"status": "affected",
"version": "451d8123f89791bb628277c0bdb4cae34a3563e6",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "a1a485e45d24b1cd8fe834fd6f1b06e2903827da",
"status": "affected",
"version": "451d8123f89791bb628277c0bdb4cae34a3563e6",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "6086258bd5ea7b5c706ff62da42b8e271b2401db",
"status": "affected",
"version": "451d8123f89791bb628277c0bdb4cae34a3563e6",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "1787b9f0729d318d67cf7c5a95f0c3dba9a7cc18",
"status": "affected",
"version": "451d8123f89791bb628277c0bdb4cae34a3563e6",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "d103fb6726904e353b4773188ee3d3acb4078363",
"status": "affected",
"version": "451d8123f89791bb628277c0bdb4cae34a3563e6",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "876f8ab52363f649bcc74072157dfd7adfbabc0d",
"status": "affected",
"version": "451d8123f89791bb628277c0bdb4cae34a3563e6",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"net/hsr/hsr_forward.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.9"
},
{
"lessThan": "5.9",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.201",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.139",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.63",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.5.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.5.12",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.2",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.7",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "A30D430C-52B1-4816-90AC-B7A8073EA4B8",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.10.201",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.9",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "81424D14-B38F-47B3-A1B8-BC3B60BB96EA",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.139",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.11",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "80E1EA7E-2788-466C-9FFB-34AFA1B052F0",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.63",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.16",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "825F64D9-E99F-49AA-8A7B-EF7C2965C5B2",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.5.12",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.2",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "4CBFF885-A4D3-4F21-B6FD-4D770034C048",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.2",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.6",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nhsr: Prevent use after free in prp_create_tagged_frame()\n\nThe prp_fill_rct() function can fail. In that situation, it frees the\nskb and returns NULL. Meanwhile on the success path, it returns the\noriginal skb. So it\u0027s straight forward to fix bug by using the returned\nvalue."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": " En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: hsr: impedir el uso despu\u00e9s de liberar en prp_create_tagged_frame(). La funci\u00f3n prp_fill_rct() puede fallar. En esa situaci\u00f3n, libera el skb y devuelve NULL. Mientras tanto, en el camino hacia el \u00e9xito, devuelve el skb original. Por lo tanto, es sencillo corregir el error utilizando el valor devuelto."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2023-52846",
"lastModified": "2026-08-04T10:18:45.827",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"type": "Secondary"
},
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2023-52846",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-05-22T18:22:52.516858Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2024-05-21T16:15:21.800",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1787b9f0729d318d67cf7c5a95f0c3dba9a7cc18"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6086258bd5ea7b5c706ff62da42b8e271b2401db"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/876f8ab52363f649bcc74072157dfd7adfbabc0d"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a1a485e45d24b1cd8fe834fd6f1b06e2903827da"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d103fb6726904e353b4773188ee3d3acb4078363"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ddf4e04e946aaa6c458b8b6829617cc44af2bffd"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1787b9f0729d318d67cf7c5a95f0c3dba9a7cc18"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6086258bd5ea7b5c706ff62da42b8e271b2401db"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/876f8ab52363f649bcc74072157dfd7adfbabc0d"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a1a485e45d24b1cd8fe834fd6f1b06e2903827da"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d103fb6726904e353b4773188ee3d3acb4078363"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ddf4e04e946aaa6c458b8b6829617cc44af2bffd"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-416"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"aggregate_severity": "Moderate",
"current_release_date": "2026-08-04T19:23:36+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2023-52846",
"id": "CVE-2023-52846",
"initial_release_date": "2023-01-01T00:00:00+00:00",
"product_status:known_affected": "108",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "90",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "kernel: hsr: Prevent use after free in prp_create_tagged_frame()",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2023/cve-2023-52846.json",
"version": "3"
},
"suse_vex": {
"aggregate_severity": "important",
"current_release_date": "2026-09-16T00:25:09Z",
"cve": "CVE-2023-52846",
"id": "CVE-2023-52846",
"initial_release_date": "2024-05-23T15:23:35Z",
"product_status:known_affected": "294",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "237",
"product_status:recommended": "816",
"source": "SUSE CSAF VEX",
"status": "interim",
"title": "SUSE CVE CVE-2023-52846",
"url": "https://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/security/csaf-vex/cve-2023-52846.json",
"version": "115"
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T23:11:36.079Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ddf4e04e946aaa6c458b8b6829617cc44af2bffd"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a1a485e45d24b1cd8fe834fd6f1b06e2903827da"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6086258bd5ea7b5c706ff62da42b8e271b2401db"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1787b9f0729d318d67cf7c5a95f0c3dba9a7cc18"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d103fb6726904e353b4773188ee3d3acb4078363"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/876f8ab52363f649bcc74072157dfd7adfbabc0d"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
},
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2023-52846",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-05-22T18:22:52.516858Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-05-23T19:01:25.641Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"net/hsr/hsr_forward.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "ddf4e04e946aaa6c458b8b6829617cc44af2bffd",
"status": "affected",
"version": "451d8123f89791bb628277c0bdb4cae34a3563e6",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "a1a485e45d24b1cd8fe834fd6f1b06e2903827da",
"status": "affected",
"version": "451d8123f89791bb628277c0bdb4cae34a3563e6",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "6086258bd5ea7b5c706ff62da42b8e271b2401db",
"status": "affected",
"version": "451d8123f89791bb628277c0bdb4cae34a3563e6",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "1787b9f0729d318d67cf7c5a95f0c3dba9a7cc18",
"status": "affected",
"version": "451d8123f89791bb628277c0bdb4cae34a3563e6",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "d103fb6726904e353b4773188ee3d3acb4078363",
"status": "affected",
"version": "451d8123f89791bb628277c0bdb4cae34a3563e6",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "876f8ab52363f649bcc74072157dfd7adfbabc0d",
"status": "affected",
"version": "451d8123f89791bb628277c0bdb4cae34a3563e6",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"net/hsr/hsr_forward.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.9"
},
{
"lessThan": "5.9",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.201",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.139",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.63",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.5.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.5.12",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.2",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.7",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.10.201",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.9",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.139",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.9",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.63",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.9",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.5.12",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.9",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.2",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.9",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.7",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.9",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nhsr: Prevent use after free in prp_create_tagged_frame()\n\nThe prp_fill_rct() function can fail. In that situation, it frees the\nskb and returns NULL. Meanwhile on the success path, it returns the\noriginal skb. So it\u0027s straight forward to fix bug by using the returned\nvalue."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "AV:A - PRP is an IEC 62439-3 L2 redundancy protocol used on industrial LANs; the vulnerable TX tagging path runs when the DANP master sends frames, which an adjacent peer can elicit (e.g. ARP replies) on the same LAN segment.\nAC:L - This is a deterministic use-after-free once padding allocation fails; an adjacent attacker can flood short-frame elicitation and stress GFP_ATOMIC memory, and UAF bugs are scored AC:L unless the attacker cannot influence the failure condition.\nPR:N - Triggering requires only unauthenticated L2 traffic on the PRP LAN (e.g. ARP requests that cause short replies through the master); no host account or capability is needed.\nUI:N - Once the PRP interface is up in its normal industrial deployment, attacker-sent LAN frames alone drive the reply/TX path into prp_create_tagged_frame() with no victim interaction.\nS:U - The UAF corrupts host kernel skb/heap state within the same OS security authority and does not cross a VM, IOMMU, or sandbox boundary.\nC:H - Use-after-free of the skb lets a reclaimed object be read through subsequent TX path accesses, enabling arbitrary kernel information disclosure per UAF guidance.\nI:H - hsr_forward_do() writes skb-\u003edev and hsr_xmit() mutates/transmits the freed skb, yielding heap corruption and write/control-flow primitives characteristic of exploitable kernel UAFs.\nA:H - Using the freed skb for TX and later free paths causes kernel oops/panic or double-free crashes, so availability impact is a full host denial of service."
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-05T09:11:39.752Z",
"orgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"shortName": "Linux"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ddf4e04e946aaa6c458b8b6829617cc44af2bffd"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a1a485e45d24b1cd8fe834fd6f1b06e2903827da"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6086258bd5ea7b5c706ff62da42b8e271b2401db"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1787b9f0729d318d67cf7c5a95f0c3dba9a7cc18"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d103fb6726904e353b4773188ee3d3acb4078363"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/876f8ab52363f649bcc74072157dfd7adfbabc0d"
}
],
"title": "hsr: Prevent use after free in prp_create_tagged_frame()",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "bippy-1.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"assignerShortName": "Linux",
"cveId": "CVE-2023-52846",
"datePublished": "2024-05-21T15:31:43.863Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-05-21T15:19:24.254Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-05T09:11:39.752Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
CERTFR-2024-AVI-1048
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: - Updated:
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une élévation de privilèges, une atteinte à la confidentialité des données et une atteinte à l'intégrité des données.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
| Vendor | Product | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap 15.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap 15.4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap 15.5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap 15.6 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Enterprise Storage | SUSE Enterprise Storage 7.1 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop | SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP4 LTSS | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP2 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2 LTSS | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing ESPOS 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing LTSS 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing LTSS 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 12-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP2 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP3 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP4 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP6 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.1 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.2 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.2 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.3 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.4 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5 LTSS | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5 LTSS Extended Security | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2 Business Critical Linux | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2 LTSS | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 Business Critical Linux | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 LTSS | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 LTSS | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP2 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Manager Proxy | SUSE Manager Proxy 4.1 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Manager Proxy | SUSE Manager Proxy 4.2 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Manager Proxy | SUSE Manager Proxy 4.3 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server | SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.1 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server | SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.2 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server | SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.3 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Manager Server | SUSE Manager Server 4.1 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Manager Server | SUSE Manager Server 4.2 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Manager Server | SUSE Manager Server 4.3 |
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Enterprise Storage 7.1",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Enterprise Storage",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP4 LTSS",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP2",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2 LTSS",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing ESPOS 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing LTSS 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing LTSS 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 12-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP2",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP3",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP4",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP6",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.1",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.2",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.2",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.3",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.4",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5 LTSS",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5 LTSS Extended Security",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2 Business Critical Linux",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2 LTSS",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 Business Critical Linux",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 LTSS",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 LTSS",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP2",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Proxy 4.1",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Manager Proxy",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Proxy 4.2",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Manager Proxy",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Proxy 4.3",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Manager Proxy",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.1",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.2",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.3",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Server 4.1",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Manager Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Server 4.2",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Manager Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Server 4.3",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Manager Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46755",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46755"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48651",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48651"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47697",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47697"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49028",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49028"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50208",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50208"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47291",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47291"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52846",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52846"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-45934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-45934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42253",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42253"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26585",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26585"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47612",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47612"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47402",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47402"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46724",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46724"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50024",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50024"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47684",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47684"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48968",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48968"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42114",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42114"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47713",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47713"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-46343",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-46343"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50045",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50045"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48790",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48790"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3435",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3435"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27398",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27398"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27043",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27043"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49023",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49023"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52340",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52340"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-28327",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28327"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-23307",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-23307"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6270",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6270"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47672",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47672"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52766",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52766"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47589",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47589"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48991",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48991"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47737",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47737"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49024",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49024"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26610",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26610"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49031",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49031"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47517",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47517"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49029",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49029"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47378",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47378"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47383",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47383"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46841",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46841"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47698",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47698"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39476",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39476"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47668",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47668"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48664",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48664"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47670",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47670"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47163",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47163"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-46936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48946",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48946"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49991",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49991"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6546",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6546"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47696",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47696"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52502",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52502"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47674",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47674"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47534",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47534"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52898",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52898"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47416",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47416"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47707",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47707"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47706",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47706"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26766",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26766"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38538",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38538"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46716",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46716"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2166",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2166"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45016"
}
],
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2024-AVI-1048",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2024-12-06T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "\u00c9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une \u00e9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges, une atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es et une atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans le noyau Linux de SUSE",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2024-11-28",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4100-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244100-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-11-28",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4103-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244103-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-05",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4208-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244208-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-02",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4124-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244124-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-05",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4218-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244218-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-05",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4221-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244221-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-05",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4217-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244217-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-05",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4195-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244195-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-05",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4197-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244197-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-02",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4140-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244140-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-05",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4210-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244210-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-04",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4161-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244161-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-02",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4129-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244129-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-05",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4219-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244219-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-02",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4131-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244131-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-02",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4141-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244141-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-05",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4220-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244220-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-04",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4179-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244179-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-02",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4125-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244125-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-05",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4214-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244214-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-04",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4180-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244180-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-03",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4160-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244160-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-04",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4170-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244170-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-04",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4177-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244177-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-02",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4122-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244122-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-05",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4206-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244206-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-02",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4123-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244123-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-02",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4128-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244128-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-05",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4209-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244209-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-05",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4207-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244207-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-02",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4127-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244127-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-05",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4216-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244216-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-02",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4120-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244120-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-02",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4139-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244139-1"
}
]
}
CERTFR-2024-AVI-1079
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: - Updated:
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une élévation de privilèges, une atteinte à la confidentialité des données et un contournement de la politique de sécurité.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
| Vendor | Product | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | openSUSE Leap | openSUSE Leap 15.5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | openSUSE Leap | openSUSE Leap 15.3 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP2 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP2 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 12-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | openSUSE Leap | openSUSE Leap 15.4 | ||
| SUSE | Basesystem Module | Basesystem Module 15-SP6 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.2 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.1 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | openSUSE Leap | openSUSE Leap 15.6 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP3 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop | SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP4 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2 |
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.5",
"product": {
"name": "openSUSE Leap",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.3",
"product": {
"name": "openSUSE Leap",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP2",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP2",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 12-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.4",
"product": {
"name": "openSUSE Leap",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Basesystem Module 15-SP6",
"product": {
"name": "Basesystem Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.2",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.1",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.6",
"product": {
"name": "openSUSE Leap",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP3",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP4",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2023-31315",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-31315"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48651",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48651"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47291",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47291"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52846",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52846"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26585",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26585"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47402",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47402"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6531",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6531"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27398",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27398"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52340",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52340"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-23307",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-23307"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-46955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26610",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26610"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47517",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47517"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47378",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47378"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47383",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47383"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6546",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6546"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52502",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52502"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47600",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47600"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26766",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26766"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26622"
}
],
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2024-AVI-1079",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2024-12-13T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "\u00c9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une \u00e9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges, une atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es et un contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans le noyau Linux de SUSE",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2024-12-09",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4265-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244265-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4255-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244255-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4228-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244228-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4256-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244256-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-09",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4262-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244262-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-09",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4263-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244263-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-09",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4266-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244266-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4248-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244248-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4227-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244227-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4239-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244239-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-10",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4276-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244276-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-09",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4261-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244261-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4247-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244247-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4237-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244237-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4226-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244226-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4234-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244234-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-09",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4264-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244264-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4240-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244240-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4230-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244230-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4243-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244243-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4242-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244242-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4249-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244249-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4235-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244235-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4241-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244241-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4246-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244246-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-10",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4275-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244275-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4250-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244250-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-09",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4268-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244268-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4231-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244231-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2024-12-06",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2024:4236-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20244236-1"
}
]
}
CERTFR-2025-AVI-0047
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: - Updated:
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits SUSE. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire, une élévation de privilèges et un déni de service à distance.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
| Vendor | Product | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | openSUSE Leap | openSUSE Leap 15.5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | openSUSE Leap | openSUSE Leap 15.3 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 12-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | openSUSE Leap | openSUSE Leap 15.4 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP6 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | Public Cloud Module | Public Cloud Module 15-SP6 | ||
| SUSE | openSUSE Leap | openSUSE Leap 15.6 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP3 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP4 |
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.5",
"product": {
"name": "openSUSE Leap",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.3",
"product": {
"name": "openSUSE Leap",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 12-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.4",
"product": {
"name": "openSUSE Leap",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP6",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Public Cloud Module 15-SP6",
"product": {
"name": "Public Cloud Module",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.6",
"product": {
"name": "openSUSE Leap",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP3",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP4",
"product": {
"name": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56645",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56645"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56536",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56536"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48651",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48651"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50262",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50262"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56549",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56549"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53222",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53222"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53213",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53213"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47291",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47291"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52846",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52846"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26585",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26585"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47402",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47402"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27397",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27397"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56604",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56604"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50202",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50202"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53126",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53126"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6531",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6531"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53206",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53206"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53117",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53117"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53191",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53191"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35839",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35839"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39480",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39480"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53136",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53136"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56667",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56667"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50228",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50228"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53150",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53150"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53142",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53142"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53169",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53169"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53144",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53144"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27398",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27398"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53157",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53157"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52340",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52340"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53200",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53200"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53179",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53179"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53159",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53159"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-23307",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-23307"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53210",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53210"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56599",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56599"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53122",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53122"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50211",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50211"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53173",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53173"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53207",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53207"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56562",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56562"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50272",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50272"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-46955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56755",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56755"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53166",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53166"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53134",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53134"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53130",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53130"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56567",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56567"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56582",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56582"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26610",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26610"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50280",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50280"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53208",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53208"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56551",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56551"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-8805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-8805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47517",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47517"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53215",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53215"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53162",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53162"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53158",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53158"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47378",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47378"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47383",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47383"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50278",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50278"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53174",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53174"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53241",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53241"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50256",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50256"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50039",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50039"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53214",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53214"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53151",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53151"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53146",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53146"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56539",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56539"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53216",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53216"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48686",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48686"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53155",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53155"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6546",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6546"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53156",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53156"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52502",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52502"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53050",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53050"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56605",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56605"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56566",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56566"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53190",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53190"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50279",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50279"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26766",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26766"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53209",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53209"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50203",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50203"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53202",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53202"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56576",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56576"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50018",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50018"
}
],
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2025-AVI-0047",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2025-01-17T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire"
},
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "\u00c9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans les produits SUSE. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire, une \u00e9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges et un d\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans le noyau Linux de SUSE",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2025-01-14",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0098-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250098-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-15",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0131-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250131-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-14",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0097-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250097-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-16",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0146-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250146-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-15",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0132-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250132-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-14",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0089-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250089-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-16",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0136-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250136-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-14",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0094-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250094-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-15",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0115-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250115-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-14",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0111-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250111-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-16",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0150-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250150-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-15",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0114-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250114-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-15",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0124-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250124-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-16",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0138-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250138-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-14",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0085-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250085-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-15",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0123-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250123-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-14",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0105-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250105-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-14",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0101-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250101-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-14",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0106-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250106-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-14",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0084-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250084-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-14",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0110-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250110-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-14",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0090-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250090-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-14",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0107-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250107-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-14",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0091-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250091-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-15",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0117-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250117-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-14",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0083-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250083-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-14",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0108-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250108-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-14",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0103-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250103-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-14",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0100-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250100-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-14",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0112-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250112-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-16",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0137-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250137-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-14",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0109-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250109-1"
}
]
}
CERTFR-2025-AVI-0071
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: - Updated:
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire, une élévation de privilèges et une atteinte à la confidentialité des données.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
| Vendor | Product | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 LTSS | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Proxy 4.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap 15.6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 12-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 LTSS | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 Business Critical Linux | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Workstation Extension 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4 LTSS EXTREME CORE | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing ESPOS 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap 15.5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | Legacy Module 15-SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing LTSS 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing LTSS 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | Basesystem Module 15-SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap 15.4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Enterprise Storage 7.1 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Real Time Module 15-SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Proxy 4.2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | Development Tools Module 15-SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.1 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing ESPOS 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Server 4.2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Manager Server 4.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5 LTSS | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap 15.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing LTSS 15 SP4 |
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 LTSS",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Proxy 4.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 12-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 LTSS",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 Business Critical Linux",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Workstation Extension 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4 LTSS EXTREME CORE",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing ESPOS 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Legacy Module 15-SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing LTSS 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing LTSS 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Basesystem Module 15-SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Enterprise Storage 7.1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Real Time Module 15-SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Proxy 4.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Development Tools Module 15-SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing ESPOS 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Server 4.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Manager Server 4.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5 LTSS",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing LTSS 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56645",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56645"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1382",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1382"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56536",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56536"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48651",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48651"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-2636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-2636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50262",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50262"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56549",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56549"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53222",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53222"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53213",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53213"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-1000253",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-1000253"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52846",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52846"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47202",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47202"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26585",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26585"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27397",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27397"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56604",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56604"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53055",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53055"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56548",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56548"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50202",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50202"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53126",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53126"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53206",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53206"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-33951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-33951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53117",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53117"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53191",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53191"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35839",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35839"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39480",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39480"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53136",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53136"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56667",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56667"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50228",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50228"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53150",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53150"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-14051",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-14051"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53142",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53142"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56571",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56571"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53169",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53169"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53144",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53144"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27398",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27398"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53157",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53157"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52340",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52340"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53200",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53200"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53179",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53179"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53159",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53159"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-36280",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-36280"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-23307",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-23307"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53210",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53210"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56599",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56599"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53239",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53239"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53122",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53122"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50211",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50211"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52524",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52524"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53173",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53173"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53051",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53051"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53207",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53207"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56562",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56562"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50272",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50272"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56631",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56631"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47666",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47666"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-33952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-33952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56755",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56755"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53166",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53166"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53134",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53134"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53130",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53130"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-24860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56567",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56567"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56582",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56582"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26610",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26610"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50280",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50280"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53208",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53208"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-20368",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-20368"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56551",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56551"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-8805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-8805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47517",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47517"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53215",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53215"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53162",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53162"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53158",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53158"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50278",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50278"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53174",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53174"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53241",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53241"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48839",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48839"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50256",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50256"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50039",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50039"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53214",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53214"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50166",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50166"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53151",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53151"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53146",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53146"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56539",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56539"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56570",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56570"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53216",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53216"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53155",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53155"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56575",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56575"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6546",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6546"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53156",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53156"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52502",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52502"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53050",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53050"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56605",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56605"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56566",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56566"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53190",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53190"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50279",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50279"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26766",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26766"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53209",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53209"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50203",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50203"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53202",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53202"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53114",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53114"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56576",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56576"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50018",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50018"
}
],
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2025-AVI-0071",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2025-01-24T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire"
},
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "\u00c9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire, une \u00e9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges et une atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans le noyau Linux de SUSE",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2025-01-17",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0153-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250153-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-17",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0172-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250172-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-21",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0202-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250202-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0184-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250184-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0188-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250188-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-17",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0152-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250152-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-17",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0158-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250158-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-17",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0181-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250181-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-17",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0177-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250177-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-17",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0180-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250180-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-17",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0154-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250154-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-17",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0185-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250185-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-21",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0203-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250203-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-17",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0173-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250173-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-17",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0168-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250168-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0187-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250187-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-17",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0179-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250179-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-21",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0201-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250201-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-17",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0164-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250164-1"
}
]
}
CERTFR-2025-AVI-0088
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: - Updated:
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, une élévation de privilèges et un déni de service à distance.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
| Vendor | Product | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5 LTSS | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap 15.4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap 15.5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 12-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | Confidential Computing Module 15-SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.2 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap 15.6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP5 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.1 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | openSUSE Leap 15.3 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5 LTSS Extended Security | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6 | ||
| SUSE | N/A | SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5 |
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro for Rancher 5.4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5 LTSS",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 12-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Confidential Computing Module 15-SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15-SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.2",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.1",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "openSUSE Leap 15.3",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5 LTSS Extended Security",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "SUSE",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2020-12770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-12770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-38160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-38160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-35477",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35477"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-34556",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-34556"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-42327",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-42327"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-36280",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-36280"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1382",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1382"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-33951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-33951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-33952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-33952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6546",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6546"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6531",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6531"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-47233",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-47233"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-24860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52340",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52340"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52502",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52502"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26585",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26585"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52434",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52434"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52591",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52591"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52524",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52524"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-23307",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-23307"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26766",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26766"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-46955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47202",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47202"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52489",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52489"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26610",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26610"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48703",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48703"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48686",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48686"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48701",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48701"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48694",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48694"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48688",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48688"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48634",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48634"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48672",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48672"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48651",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48651"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48693",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48693"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48652",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48652"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48671",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48671"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48700",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48700"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48687",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48687"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48695",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48695"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48675",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48675"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48697",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48697"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48699",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48699"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48632",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48632"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27398",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27398"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-36788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-36788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-4148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47365",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47365"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47378",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47378"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47383",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47383"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47402",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47402"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47489",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47489"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47491",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47491"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47492",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47492"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52654",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52654"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52655",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52655"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52676",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52676"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35895",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35895"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27029",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27029"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38589",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38589"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27397",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27397"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52846",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52846"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39480",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39480"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47291",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47291"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36484",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36484"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35839",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35839"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47517",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47517"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47709",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47709"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50228",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50228"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50252",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50252"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50256",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50256"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50262",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50262"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50272",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50272"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50278",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50278"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50279",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50279"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50280",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50280"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50299",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50299"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53043",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53043"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53055",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53055"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53241",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53241"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46680",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46680"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46765",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46765"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47666",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47666"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50039",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50039"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26596",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26596"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50166",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50166"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53051",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53051"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53110",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53110"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53114",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53114"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53138",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53138"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53142",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53142"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50151",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50151"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50199",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50199"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50202",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50202"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53122",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53122"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53130",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53130"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53136",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53136"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53144",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53144"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-8805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-8805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50018",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50018"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50203",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50203"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50211",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50211"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53050",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53050"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53117",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53117"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53126",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53126"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53134",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53134"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53146",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53146"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53150",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53150"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53151",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53151"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53155",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53155"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53156",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53156"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53157",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53157"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53158",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53158"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53159",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53159"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53162",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53162"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53166",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53166"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53169",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53169"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53173",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53173"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53174",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53174"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53179",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53179"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53190",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53190"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53191",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53191"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53200",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53200"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53202",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53202"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53206",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53206"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53207",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53207"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53208",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53208"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53209",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53209"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53210",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53210"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53213",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53213"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53214",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53214"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53215",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53215"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53216",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53216"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53222",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53222"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56536",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56536"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56539",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56539"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56549",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56549"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56551",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56551"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56562",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56562"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56566",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56566"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56567",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56567"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56576",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56576"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56582",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56582"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56599",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56599"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56604",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56604"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56605",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56605"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56645",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56645"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56667",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56667"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56755",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56755"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53239",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53239"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56548",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56548"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56570",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56570"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56571",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56571"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56575",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56575"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56631",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56631"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36476",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36476"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39282",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39282"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-48873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-48873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-48881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-48881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49569",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49569"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50051",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50051"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50106",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50106"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-52332",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52332"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53170",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53170"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53172",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53172"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53175",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53175"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53196",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53196"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53197",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53197"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53227"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53230",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53230"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53233",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53233"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53690",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53690"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-54680",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-54680"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-55639",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-55639"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-55881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-55881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-55916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-55916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56369",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56369"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56372",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56372"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56531",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56531"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56532",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56532"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56533",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56533"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56538",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56538"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56543",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56543"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56546",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56546"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56557",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56557"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56558",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56558"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56568",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56568"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56569",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56569"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56572",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56572"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56573",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56573"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56574",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56574"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53164",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53164"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56577",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56577"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56578",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56578"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56584",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56584"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56587",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56587"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56588",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56588"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56589",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56589"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56590",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56590"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56593",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56593"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56594",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56594"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56595",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56595"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56596",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56596"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-5660",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-5660"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56603",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56603"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56606",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56606"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56607",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56607"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56609",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56609"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56611",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56611"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56614",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56614"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56616",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56616"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56617",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56617"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56620",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56620"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56623",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56623"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56625",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56625"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56630",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56630"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56632",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56632"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56634",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56634"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56637",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56637"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56641",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56641"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56642",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56642"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56643",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56643"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56644",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56644"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56648",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56648"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56649",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56649"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56651",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56651"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56654",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56654"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56656",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56656"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56660",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56660"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56661",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56661"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56664",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56664"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56670",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56670"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56672",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56672"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56675",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56675"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56677",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56677"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56681",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56681"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56683",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56683"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56687",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56687"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56688",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56688"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56690",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56690"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56691",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56691"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56694",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56694"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56698",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56698"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56700",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56700"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56701",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56701"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56708",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56708"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56709",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56709"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56712",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56712"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56716",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56716"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56722",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56722"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56723",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56723"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56724",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56724"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56729",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56729"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56760",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56760"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56765",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56765"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56766",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56766"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56769",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56769"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56776",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56776"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57792",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57792"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57793",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57793"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57798",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57798"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57850",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57850"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57874",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57874"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57888",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57888"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57892",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57892"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57893",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57893"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57897",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57897"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21632",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21632"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21645",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21645"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21646",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21646"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21649",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21649"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21650",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21650"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21651",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21651"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21656",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21656"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21662"
}
],
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2025-AVI-0088",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2025-01-31T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "\u00c9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges"
},
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
},
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans le noyau Linux de SUSE. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance, une \u00e9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges et un d\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans le noyau Linux de SUSE",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2025-01-28",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0268-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250268-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-27",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0244-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250244-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-27",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0248-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250248-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-27",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0260-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250260-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-27",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0250-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250250-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-27",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0252-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250252-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0238-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250238-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-27",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0261-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250261-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-28",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0269-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250269-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-24",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0230-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250230-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-27",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0243-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250243-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-27",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0246-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250246-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-27",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0242-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250242-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0240-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250240-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-27",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0255-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250255-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-26",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0241-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250241-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0239-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250239-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-29",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0289-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250289-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-24",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0229-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250229-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-27",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0264-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250264-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-27",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0245-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250245-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-27",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0266-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250266-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-27",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0265-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250265-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-27",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0251-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250251-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-24",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0231-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250231-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-27",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0262-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250262-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-24",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0236-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250236-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-27",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0253-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250253-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-27",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0249-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250249-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-27",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0254-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250254-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-01-27",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SUSE-SU-2025:0263-1",
"url": "https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250263-1"
}
]
}
CERTFR-2025-AVI-1057
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2025-12-02 - Updated: 2025-12-02
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits VMware. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un problème de sécurité non spécifié par l'éditeur.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
| Vendor | Product | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VMware | Tanzu Data Intelligence | Tanzu pour Postgres versions 16.x antérieures à 16.11.0 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Data Intelligence | Tanzu pour Postgres versions 14.x antérieures à 14.20.0 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Data Intelligence | Tanzu pour Postgres versions 17.x antérieures à 17.7.0 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime | Tanzu Hub versions antérieures à 10.3.1 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Data Intelligence | Tanzu pour Postgres versions 18.x antérieures à 18.1.0 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Data Intelligence | Tanzu pour Postgres versions 15.x antérieures à 15.15.0 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Data Intelligence | Tanzu pour Postgres versions 13.x antérieures à 13.23.0 |
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "Tanzu pour Postgres versions 16.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 16.11.0",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Data Intelligence",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Tanzu pour Postgres versions 14.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 14.20.0",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Data Intelligence",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Tanzu pour Postgres versions 17.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 17.7.0",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Data Intelligence",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Tanzu Hub versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 10.3.1",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Kubernetes Runtime",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Tanzu pour Postgres versions 18.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 18.1.0",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Data Intelligence",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Tanzu pour Postgres versions 15.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 15.15.0",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Data Intelligence",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Tanzu pour Postgres versions 13.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 13.23.0",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Data Intelligence",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2019-12900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-12900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-25013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-25013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-28196",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-28196"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-10029",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-10029"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-18276",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-18276"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3421",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3421"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3326",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3326"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-27618",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-27618"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-20227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-20227"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-36222",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-36222"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-23960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-23960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-37967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-37967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-37434",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-37434"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2309",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2309"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-43680",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-43680"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-29824",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-29824"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-23308",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-23308"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-35737",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-35737"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-40303",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-40303"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-40304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-40304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-42898",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-42898"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3633",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3633"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-32205",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-32205"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-32206",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-32206"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-25032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-25032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-22942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-22942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-26878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-26878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-20266",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-20266"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-1292",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1292"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-1974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3521",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3521"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-27774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-27774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-27775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-27775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-22576",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-22576"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-27776",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-27776"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-20154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-20154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-7500",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-7500"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-33574",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33574"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-36690",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-36690"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-37750",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37750"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-23218",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-23218"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-23219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-23219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-27782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-27782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-32208",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-32208"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-27781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-27781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-32207",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-32207"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3358",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3358"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-1271",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1271"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-29458",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-29458"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-39537",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-39537"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-32221",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-32221"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-42916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-42916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-35252",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-35252"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-42915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-42915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-43551",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-43551"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-43552",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-43552"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-4304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-4304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-4203",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-4203"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0401",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0401"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0215",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0215"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0216",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0216"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-4450",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-4450"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-27672",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-27672"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0045",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0045"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-23915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-23915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-23914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-23914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-23916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-23916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-1304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-24329",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-24329"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0464",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0464"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0466",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0466"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0465",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0465"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-28410",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28410"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-29469",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-29469"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-28484",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28484"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2650",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2650"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-27535",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-27535"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-27779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-27779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-27533",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-27533"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-27538",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-27538"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-27534",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-27534"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-27536",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-27536"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-27780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-27780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-30115",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-30115"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1380",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1380"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-1752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-1752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-35942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-38604",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-38604"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-29562",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-29562"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-27645",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-27645"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3534",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3534"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2156",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2156"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-3006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1255",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1255"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-28322",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28322"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-46908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-46908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-31239",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-31239"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-28320",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28320"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-28321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-4899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-4899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-3446",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3446"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-28319",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28319"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-3817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-4387",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4387"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-38546",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-38546"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-38545",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-38545"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5363",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5363"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-4807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-45853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-31085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-31085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-40217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-40217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-22218",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-22218"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2603",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2603"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-4813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-0563",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0563"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-4039",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4039"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5156",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5156"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-29491",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-29491"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-39615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-37600",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-37600"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-33294",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33294"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-43618",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-43618"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-45322",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45322"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-17498",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-17498"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2013-4235",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2013-4235"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-29383",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-29383"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-48795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-48795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-36054",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-36054"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-7104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-7104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-46218",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-46218"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52467",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52467"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52451",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52451"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52445",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52445"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52462",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52462"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52469",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52469"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52470",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52470"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52464",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52464"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52475",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52475"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52478",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52478"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26603",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26603"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52452",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52452"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52532",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52532"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-25162",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-25162"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-46904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-24855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-27043",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-27043"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-36632",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-36632"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-28085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-28085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-2511",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-2511"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-22916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-22916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26631",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26631"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-7501",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-7501"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-35939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-35938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-35937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-35937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52426",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52426"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52501",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52501"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52519",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52519"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26717",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26717"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26670",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26670"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52477",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52477"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52528",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52528"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52582",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52582"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52513",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52513"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-22099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-22099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52520",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52520"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-7042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-7042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52523",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52523"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-24858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-24857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26660",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26660"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26760",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26760"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26681",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26681"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26621",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26621"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26714",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26714"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26761",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26761"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-46984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47202",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47202"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26605",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26605"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52468",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52468"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52487",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52487"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26618",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26618"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52490",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52490"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52455",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52455"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52472",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52472"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52643",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52643"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26649",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26649"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52473",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52473"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52465",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52465"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2007-4559",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2007-4559"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52425",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52425"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-4603",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-4603"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47197",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47197"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47196",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47196"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48701",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48701"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48694",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48694"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48644",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48644"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48653",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48653"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47214",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47214"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48672",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48672"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48657",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48657"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48652",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48652"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48658",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48658"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47210",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47210"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48639",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48639"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52646",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52646"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48640",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48640"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47215",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47215"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27039",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27039"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48675",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48675"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48690",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48690"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47191",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47191"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48637",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48637"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48632",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48632"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48660",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48660"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-4741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-4741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52565",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52565"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26892",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26892"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9230",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9230"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47227"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47239",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47239"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47250",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47250"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47343",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47343"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47360",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47360"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47365",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47365"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47373",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47373"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47393",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47393"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47398",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47398"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47404",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47404"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47420",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47420"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47422",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47422"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47426",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47426"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47428",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47428"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47429",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47429"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47430",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47430"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47438",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47438"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47444",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47444"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47454",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47454"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47457",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47457"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47465",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47465"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47481",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47481"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47483",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47483"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47490",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47490"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47495",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47495"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47497",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47497"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47499",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47499"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47500",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47500"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47505",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47505"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47516",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47516"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47527",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47527"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47536",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47536"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47537",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47537"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47538",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47538"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47550",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47550"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47559",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47559"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48689",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48689"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48691",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48691"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48709",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48709"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48710",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48710"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52654",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52654"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52661",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52661"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52686",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52686"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52690",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52690"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52698",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52698"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52703",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52703"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52730",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52730"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52731",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52731"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52736",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52736"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52744",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52744"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-28757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-28757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-5535",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-5535"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52675",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52675"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52697",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52697"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26611",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26611"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26674",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26674"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27031",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27031"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35824",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35824"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35991",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35991"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-2398",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-2398"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0397",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0397"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-4030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-4030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-4032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-4032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52648",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52648"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52649",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52649"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27390",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27390"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35831",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35831"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-3596",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-3596"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52560",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52560"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0450",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0450"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-25062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26458",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26458"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26461",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26461"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47539",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47539"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47572",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47572"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47576",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47576"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47578",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47578"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47601",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47601"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47607",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47607"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47609",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47609"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47616",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47616"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47617",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47617"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47620",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47620"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48712",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48712"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48713",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48713"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48714",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48714"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48720",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48720"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48724",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48724"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48725",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48725"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48728",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48728"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48729",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48729"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48760",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48760"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48768",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48768"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48769",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48769"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52846",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52846"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36477",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36477"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-4641",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4641"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-50495",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-50495"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-24859",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24859"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26734",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26734"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26831",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26831"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35892",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35892"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39298",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39298"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39493",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39493"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39500",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39500"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52750",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52750"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52792",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52792"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38566",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38566"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39291",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39291"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-6923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-3219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-3219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36028",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36028"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38561",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38561"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38604",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38604"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38606",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38606"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47579",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47579"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27404",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27404"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39479",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39479"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39498",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39498"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-6197",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6197"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47623",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47623"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48784",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48784"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48793",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48793"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48797",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48797"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48812",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48812"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-58056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-58057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-10966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-10966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-59425",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59425"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48831",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48831"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48839",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48839"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48850",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48850"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-6232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-12817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-12817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-12818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-12818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-6119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-14844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-24031",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-24031"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-24032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-24032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-44964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-44964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-28805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-28805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-33099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-33099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0306",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0306"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-52099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-52099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-53643",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53643"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-59375",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59375"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-6141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-7709",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-7709"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9714",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9714"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45491",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45491"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45492",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45492"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38632",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38632"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39491",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39491"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42109",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42109"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47517",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47517"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52859",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52859"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52898",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52898"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26637",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26637"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26682",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26682"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26683",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26683"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39486",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39486"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41037",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41037"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41038",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41038"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41039",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41039"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41045",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41045"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42132",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42132"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42138",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42138"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42139",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42139"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42239",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42239"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42241",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42241"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42245",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42245"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42268",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42268"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42278",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42278"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42291",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42291"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42315",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42315"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42316",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42316"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43821",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43821"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43874",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43874"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-7264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-7264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41031",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41031"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42243",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42243"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-34459",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34459"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-8096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-8096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45029",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45029"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46711",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46711"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46784",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46784"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42294",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42294"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46672",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46672"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46706",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46706"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46709",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46709"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46710",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46710"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46797",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46797"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37370",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37370"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37371",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37371"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-9143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-9143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26721",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26721"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42258",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42258"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45490",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45490"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-7592",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-7592"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-8088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-8088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-54121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-54121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2012-2114",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2012-2114"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-46937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-46999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47226",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47226"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47251",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47251"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47266",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47266"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47318",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47318"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47325",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47325"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47346",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47346"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47349",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47349"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47519",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47519"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47561",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47561"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47613",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47613"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-1247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-20153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-20153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48641",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48641"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48643",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48643"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48707",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48707"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48719",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48719"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49018",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49018"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49048",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49048"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49052",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49052"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49152",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49152"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49334",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49334"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49340",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49340"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49374",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49374"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49401",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49401"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49403",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49403"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49450",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49450"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49554",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49554"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49557",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49557"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49567",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49567"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49571",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49571"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49572",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49572"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49573",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49573"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49574",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49574"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49575",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49575"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49577",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49577"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49580",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49580"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49585",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49585"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49587",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49587"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49593",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49593"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49594",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49594"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49595",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49595"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49596",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49596"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49599",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49599"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49600",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49600"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49601",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49601"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49604",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49604"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49612",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49612"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49633",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49633"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49637",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49637"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49639",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49639"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49691",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49691"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49744",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49744"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49760",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49760"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-31082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-31082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52516",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52516"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52568",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52568"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52570",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52570"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52689",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52689"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52706",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52706"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52991",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52991"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-23196",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-23196"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26725",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26725"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27023",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27023"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53073",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53073"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53225",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53225"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56668",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56668"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21709",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21709"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21874",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21874"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-24357",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-24357"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-25183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-25183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-29770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-29770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-30165",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30165"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-30202",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30202"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-32381",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32381"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-32444",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32444"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-46570",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-46570"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-47277",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47277"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-48887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-48887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-48956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-48956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-57809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-57809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-62372",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-62372"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-62426",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-62426"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-65106",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-65106"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-9681",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-9681"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-11168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-11168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48946",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48946"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49024",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49024"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49028",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49028"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49029",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49029"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46766",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46766"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43869",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43869"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47672",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47672"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47675",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47675"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47682",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47682"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47687",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47687"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47696",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47696"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47715",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47715"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47719",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47719"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49946",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49946"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50023",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50023"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46824",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46824"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50126",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50126"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50215",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50215"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50235",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50235"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50250",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50250"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50252",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50252"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50255",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50255"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50259",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50259"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50271",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50271"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53055",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53055"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50226",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50226"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-11053",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-11053"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50110",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50110"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42317",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42317"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43820",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43820"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43888",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43888"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46697",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46697"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46698",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46698"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46793",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46793"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47734",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47734"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49856",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49856"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50186",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50186"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50189",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50189"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50102",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50102"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50128",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50128"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50136",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50136"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50139",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50139"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50146",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50146"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50147",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50147"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50155",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50155"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50157",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50157"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50158",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50158"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50169",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50169"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50172",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50172"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50182",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50182"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50200",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50200"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50216",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50216"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50274",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50274"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50275",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50275"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53045",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53045"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53048",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53048"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53110",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53110"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50162",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50162"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50163",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50163"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53123",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53123"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53136",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53136"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53117",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53117"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53134",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53134"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53151",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53151"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53166",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53166"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53169",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53169"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53202",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53202"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53206",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53206"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53207",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53207"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53208",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53208"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53213",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53213"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53215",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53215"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53222",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53222"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56549",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56549"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56667",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56667"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-48873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-48873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53170",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53170"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53175",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53175"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53230",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53230"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-55881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-55881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56372",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56372"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56617",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56617"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56625",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56625"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56632",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56632"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56654",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56654"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56675",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56675"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56708",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56708"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56709",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56709"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56729",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56729"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56760",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56760"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56765",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56765"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57793",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57793"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21645",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21645"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21649",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21649"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0167",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0167"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0725",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0725"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46820",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46820"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56707",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56707"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56725",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56725"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56726",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56726"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21670",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21670"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50164",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50164"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21647",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21647"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21668",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21668"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21671",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21671"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21681",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21681"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-13176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-13176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47222",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47222"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47700",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47700"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50029",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50029"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50109",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50109"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50114",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50114"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50152",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50152"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50165",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50165"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50197",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50197"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50207",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50207"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50294",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50294"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50303",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50303"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53109",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53109"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53167",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53167"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53189",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53189"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56535",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56535"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56545",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56545"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56696",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56696"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21694",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21694"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21716",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21716"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21724",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21724"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21725",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21725"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21790",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21790"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49043",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49043"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45336",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45336"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45341",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45341"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47648",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47648"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47649",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47649"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47650",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47650"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49061",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49061"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49065",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49065"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49100",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49100"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49122",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49122"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49130",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49130"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49147",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49147"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49155",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49155"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49156",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49156"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49159",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49159"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49174",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49174"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49175",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49175"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49187",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49187"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49206",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49206"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49208",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49208"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49216",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49216"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49227"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49257",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49257"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49259",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49259"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49262",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49262"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49263",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49263"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49266",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49266"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49268",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49268"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49269",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49269"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49272",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49272"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49273",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49273"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49279",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49279"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49290",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49290"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49297",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49297"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49307",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49307"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49308",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49308"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49322",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49322"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49323",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49323"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49339",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49339"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49341",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49341"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49343",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49343"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49345",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49345"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49350",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49350"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49352",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49352"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49356",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49356"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49357",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49357"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49376",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49376"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49378",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49378"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49379",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49379"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49384",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49384"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49394",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49394"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49400",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49400"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49402",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49402"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49404",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49404"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49407",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49407"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49409",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49409"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49422",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49422"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49432",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49432"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49433",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49433"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49434",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49434"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49441",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49441"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49447",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49447"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49455",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49455"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49468",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49468"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49472",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49472"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49475",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49475"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49481",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49481"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49486",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49486"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49492",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49492"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49498",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49498"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49503",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49503"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49508",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49508"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49515",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49515"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49519",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49519"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49520",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49520"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49521",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49521"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49523",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49523"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49526",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49526"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49532",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49532"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49545",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49545"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49559",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49559"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49581",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49581"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49583",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49583"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49584",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49584"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49592",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49592"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49603",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49603"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49605",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49605"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49606",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49606"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49607",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49607"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49611",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49611"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49613",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49613"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49625",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49625"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49627",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49627"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49631",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49631"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49634",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49634"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49640",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49640"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49641",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49641"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49642",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49642"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49643",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49643"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49646",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49646"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49648",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49648"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49653",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49653"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49656",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49656"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49657",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49657"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49670",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49670"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49671",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49671"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49672",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49672"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49674",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49674"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49675",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49675"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49688",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49688"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49699",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49699"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49707",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49707"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49708",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49708"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49710",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49710"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49716",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49716"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49721",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49721"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49723",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49723"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49726",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49726"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49731",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49731"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-48876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-48876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53681",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53681"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-54460",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-54460"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-55642",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-55642"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56613",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56613"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56624",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56624"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56638",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56638"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56653",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56653"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56657",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56657"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56669",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56669"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56710",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56710"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56714",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56714"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21644",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21644"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-27113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57993",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57993"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58061",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58061"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21706",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21706"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21707",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21707"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49139",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49139"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49204",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49204"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49205",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49205"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49207",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49207"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49209",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49209"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49225",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49225"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49228",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49228"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49330",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49330"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49353",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49353"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49406",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49406"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49436",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49436"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49446",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49446"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49476",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49476"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49511",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49511"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49518",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49518"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49538",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49538"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49548",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49548"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49552",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49552"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49560",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49560"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49565",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49565"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49624",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49624"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49638",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49638"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49655",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49655"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49658",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49658"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49697",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49697"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52993",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52993"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53029",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53029"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46736",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46736"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21723",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21723"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21856",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21856"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21869",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21869"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21888",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21888"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-8176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-8176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-24928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-24928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49372",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49372"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49578",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49578"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49589",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49589"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49620",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49620"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53031",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53031"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21691",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21691"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-27516",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27516"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-4516",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4516"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-9287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-9287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-32414",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32414"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-32415",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32415"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49197",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49197"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49561",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49561"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49590",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49590"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21895",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21895"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-4947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-5025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56433",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56433"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1390",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1390"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-29088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-29088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-32434",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32434"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-43859",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-43859"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-6021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-3576",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-3576"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21713",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21713"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-6069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-50182",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-50182"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47316",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47316"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-32256",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-32256"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-25260",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25260"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1371",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1371"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1376",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1376"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1377",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1377"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-49794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-49794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-49796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-49796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-54456",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-54456"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-6965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-55163",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-55163"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26462",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26462"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1352",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1352"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1365",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1365"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1372",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1372"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-27587",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27587"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-49795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-49795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-6170",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6170"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-41248",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-41248"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2025-12-02T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2025-12-02T00:00:00",
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2025-AVI-1057",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2025-12-02T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans les produits VMware. Elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer un probl\u00e8me de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans les produits VMware",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2025-12-01",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36560",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36560"
},
{
"published_at": "2025-12-01",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 36564",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/36564"
}
]
}
FKIE_CVE-2023-52846
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2024-05-21 16:15 - Updated: 2026-08-04 10:187.8 (High) - CVSS:3.1/
| URL | Tags | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1787b9f0729d318d67cf7c5a95f0c3dba9a7cc18 | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6086258bd5ea7b5c706ff62da42b8e271b2401db | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/876f8ab52363f649bcc74072157dfd7adfbabc0d | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a1a485e45d24b1cd8fe834fd6f1b06e2903827da | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d103fb6726904e353b4773188ee3d3acb4078363 | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ddf4e04e946aaa6c458b8b6829617cc44af2bffd | Patch | |
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1787b9f0729d318d67cf7c5a95f0c3dba9a7cc18 | Patch | |
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6086258bd5ea7b5c706ff62da42b8e271b2401db | Patch | |
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/876f8ab52363f649bcc74072157dfd7adfbabc0d | Patch | |
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a1a485e45d24b1cd8fe834fd6f1b06e2903827da | Patch | |
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d103fb6726904e353b4773188ee3d3acb4078363 | Patch | |
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ddf4e04e946aaa6c458b8b6829617cc44af2bffd | Patch |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * |
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"net/hsr/hsr_forward.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "ddf4e04e946aaa6c458b8b6829617cc44af2bffd",
"status": "affected",
"version": "451d8123f89791bb628277c0bdb4cae34a3563e6",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "a1a485e45d24b1cd8fe834fd6f1b06e2903827da",
"status": "affected",
"version": "451d8123f89791bb628277c0bdb4cae34a3563e6",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "6086258bd5ea7b5c706ff62da42b8e271b2401db",
"status": "affected",
"version": "451d8123f89791bb628277c0bdb4cae34a3563e6",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "1787b9f0729d318d67cf7c5a95f0c3dba9a7cc18",
"status": "affected",
"version": "451d8123f89791bb628277c0bdb4cae34a3563e6",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "d103fb6726904e353b4773188ee3d3acb4078363",
"status": "affected",
"version": "451d8123f89791bb628277c0bdb4cae34a3563e6",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "876f8ab52363f649bcc74072157dfd7adfbabc0d",
"status": "affected",
"version": "451d8123f89791bb628277c0bdb4cae34a3563e6",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"net/hsr/hsr_forward.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.9"
},
{
"lessThan": "5.9",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.201",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.139",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.63",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.5.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.5.12",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.2",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.7",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "A30D430C-52B1-4816-90AC-B7A8073EA4B8",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.10.201",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.9",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "81424D14-B38F-47B3-A1B8-BC3B60BB96EA",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.139",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.11",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "80E1EA7E-2788-466C-9FFB-34AFA1B052F0",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.63",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.16",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "825F64D9-E99F-49AA-8A7B-EF7C2965C5B2",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.5.12",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.2",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "4CBFF885-A4D3-4F21-B6FD-4D770034C048",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.2",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.6",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nhsr: Prevent use after free in prp_create_tagged_frame()\n\nThe prp_fill_rct() function can fail. In that situation, it frees the\nskb and returns NULL. Meanwhile on the success path, it returns the\noriginal skb. So it\u0027s straight forward to fix bug by using the returned\nvalue."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": " En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: hsr: impedir el uso despu\u00e9s de liberar en prp_create_tagged_frame(). La funci\u00f3n prp_fill_rct() puede fallar. En esa situaci\u00f3n, libera el skb y devuelve NULL. Mientras tanto, en el camino hacia el \u00e9xito, devuelve el skb original. Por lo tanto, es sencillo corregir el error utilizando el valor devuelto."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2023-52846",
"lastModified": "2026-08-04T10:18:45.827",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"type": "Secondary"
},
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2023-52846",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-05-22T18:22:52.516858Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2024-05-21T16:15:21.800",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1787b9f0729d318d67cf7c5a95f0c3dba9a7cc18"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6086258bd5ea7b5c706ff62da42b8e271b2401db"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/876f8ab52363f649bcc74072157dfd7adfbabc0d"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a1a485e45d24b1cd8fe834fd6f1b06e2903827da"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d103fb6726904e353b4773188ee3d3acb4078363"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ddf4e04e946aaa6c458b8b6829617cc44af2bffd"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1787b9f0729d318d67cf7c5a95f0c3dba9a7cc18"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6086258bd5ea7b5c706ff62da42b8e271b2401db"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/876f8ab52363f649bcc74072157dfd7adfbabc0d"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a1a485e45d24b1cd8fe834fd6f1b06e2903827da"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d103fb6726904e353b4773188ee3d3acb4078363"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ddf4e04e946aaa6c458b8b6829617cc44af2bffd"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-416"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
GHSA-G3G2-RM55-27FJ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-05-21 18:31 – Updated: 2024-12-31 21:30In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
hsr: Prevent use after free in prp_create_tagged_frame()
The prp_fill_rct() function can fail. In that situation, it frees the skb and returns NULL. Meanwhile on the success path, it returns the original skb. So it's straight forward to fix bug by using the returned value.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-52846"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-416"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-05-21T16:15:21Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nhsr: Prevent use after free in prp_create_tagged_frame()\n\nThe prp_fill_rct() function can fail. In that situation, it frees the\nskb and returns NULL. Meanwhile on the success path, it returns the\noriginal skb. So it\u0027s straight forward to fix bug by using the returned\nvalue.",
"id": "GHSA-g3g2-rm55-27fj",
"modified": "2024-12-31T21:30:45Z",
"published": "2024-05-21T18:31:22Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52846"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1787b9f0729d318d67cf7c5a95f0c3dba9a7cc18"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6086258bd5ea7b5c706ff62da42b8e271b2401db"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/876f8ab52363f649bcc74072157dfd7adfbabc0d"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a1a485e45d24b1cd8fe834fd6f1b06e2903827da"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d103fb6726904e353b4773188ee3d3acb4078363"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ddf4e04e946aaa6c458b8b6829617cc44af2bffd"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
OESA-2024-1682 (CVE-2021-47421)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2024-05-31 11:07 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:07 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu: handle the case of pci_channel_io_frozen only in amdgpu_pci_resume
In current code, when a PCI error state pci_channel_io_normal is detectd, it will report PCI_ERS_RESULT_CAN_RECOVER status to PCI driver, and PCI driver will continue the execution of PCI resume callback report_resume by pci_walk_bridge, and the callback will go into amdgpu_pci_resume finally, where write lock is releasd unconditionally without acquiring such lock first. In this case, a deadlock will happen when other threads start to acquire the read lock.
To fix this, add a member in amdgpu_device strucutre to cache pci_channel_state, and only continue the execution in amdgpu_pci_resume when it's pci_channel_io_frozen.(CVE-2021-47421)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ptp: Fix possible memory leak in ptp_clock_register()
I got memory leak as follows when doing fault injection test:
unreferenced object 0xffff88800906c618 (size 8): comm "i2c-idt82p33931", pid 4421, jiffies 4294948083 (age 13.188s) hex dump (first 8 bytes): 70 74 70 30 00 00 00 00 ptp0.... backtrace: [<00000000312ed458>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x19f/0x3a0 [<0000000079f6e2ff>] kvasprintf+0xb5/0x150 [<0000000026aae54f>] kvasprintf_const+0x60/0x190 [<00000000f323a5f7>] kobject_set_name_vargs+0x56/0x150 [<000000004e35abdd>] dev_set_name+0xc0/0x100 [<00000000f20cfe25>] ptp_clock_register+0x9f4/0xd30 [ptp] [<000000008bb9f0de>] idt82p33_probe.cold+0x8b6/0x1561 [ptp_idt82p33]
When posix_clock_register() returns an error, the name allocated in dev_set_name() will be leaked, the put_device() should be used to give up the device reference, then the name will be freed in kobject_cleanup() and other memory will be freed in ptp_clock_release().(CVE-2021-47455)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: enetc: deny offload of tc-based TSN features on VF interfaces
TSN features on the ENETC (taprio, cbs, gate, police) are configured through a mix of command BD ring messages and port registers: enetc_port_rd(), enetc_port_wr().
Port registers are a region of the ENETC memory map which are only accessible from the PCIe Physical Function. They are not accessible from the Virtual Functions.
Moreover, attempting to access these registers crashes the kernel:
$ echo 1 > /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000\:00\:00.0/sriov_numvfs pci 0000:00:01.0: [1957:ef00] type 00 class 0x020001 fsl_enetc_vf 0000:00:01.0: Adding to iommu group 15 fsl_enetc_vf 0000:00:01.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0002) fsl_enetc_vf 0000:00:01.0 eno0vf0: renamed from eth0 $ tc qdisc replace dev eno0vf0 root taprio num_tc 8 map 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 \ queues 1@0 1@1 1@2 1@3 1@4 1@5 1@6 1@7 base-time 0 \ sched-entry S 0x7f 900000 sched-entry S 0x80 100000 flags 0x2 Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffff800009551a08 Internal error: Oops: 96000007 [#1] PREEMPT SMP pc : enetc_setup_tc_taprio+0x170/0x47c lr : enetc_setup_tc_taprio+0x16c/0x47c Call trace: enetc_setup_tc_taprio+0x170/0x47c enetc_setup_tc+0x38/0x2dc taprio_change+0x43c/0x970 taprio_init+0x188/0x1e0 qdisc_create+0x114/0x470 tc_modify_qdisc+0x1fc/0x6c0 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x12c/0x390
Split enetc_setup_tc() into separate functions for the PF and for the VF drivers. Also remove enetc_qos.o from being included into enetc-vf.ko, since it serves absolutely no purpose there.(CVE-2022-48645)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/tegra: dsi: Add missing check for of_find_device_by_node
Add check for the return value of of_find_device_by_node() and return the error if it fails in order to avoid NULL pointer dereference.(CVE-2023-52650)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
NTB: fix possible name leak in ntb_register_device()
If device_register() fails in ntb_register_device(), the device name allocated by dev_set_name() should be freed. As per the comment in device_register(), callers should use put_device() to give up the reference in the error path. So fix this by calling put_device() in the error path so that the name can be freed in kobject_cleanup().
As a result of this, put_device() in the error path of ntb_register_device() is removed and the actual error is returned.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
SUNRPC: fix a memleak in gss_import_v2_context
The ctx->mech_used.data allocated by kmemdup is not freed in neither gss_import_v2_context nor it only caller gss_krb5_import_sec_context, which frees ctx on error.
Thus, this patch reform the last call of gss_import_v2_context to the gss_krb5_import_ctx_v2, preventing the memleak while keepping the return formation.(CVE-2023-52653)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
io_uring: drop any code related to SCM_RIGHTS
This is dead code after we dropped support for passing io_uring fds over SCM_RIGHTS, get rid of it.(CVE-2023-52656)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: atlantic: eliminate double free in error handling logic
Driver has a logic leak in ring data allocation/free, where aq_ring_free could be called multiple times on same ring, if system is under stress and got memory allocation error.
Ring pointer was used as an indicator of failure, but this is not correct since only ring data is allocated/deallocated. Ring itself is an array member.
Changing ring allocation functions to return error code directly. This simplifies error handling and eliminates aq_ring_free on higher layer.(CVE-2023-52664)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ALSA: scarlett2: Add clamp() in scarlett2_mixer_ctl_put()
Ensure the value passed to scarlett2_mixer_ctl_put() is between 0 and SCARLETT2_MIXER_MAX_VALUE so we don't attempt to access outside scarlett2_mixer_values[].(CVE-2023-52674)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ACPI: LPIT: Avoid u32 multiplication overflow
In lpit_update_residency() there is a possibility of overflow in multiplication, if tsc_khz is large enough (> UINT_MAX/1000).
Change multiplication to mul_u32_u32().
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2023-52683)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
calipso: fix memory leak in netlbl_calipso_add_pass()
If IPv6 support is disabled at boot (ipv6.disable=1), the calipso_init() -> netlbl_calipso_ops_register() function isn't called, and the netlbl_calipso_ops_get() function always returns NULL. In this case, the netlbl_calipso_add_pass() function allocates memory for the doi_def variable but doesn't free it with the calipso_doi_free().
BUG: memory leak unreferenced object 0xffff888011d68180 (size 64): comm "syz-executor.1", pid 10746, jiffies 4295410986 (age 17.928s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 00 00 00 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [<...>] kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:552 [inline] [<...>] netlbl_calipso_add_pass net/netlabel/netlabel_calipso.c:76 [inline] [<...>] netlbl_calipso_add+0x22e/0x4f0 net/netlabel/netlabel_calipso.c:111 [<...>] genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0x22f/0x330 net/netlink/genetlink.c:739 [<...>] genl_family_rcv_msg net/netlink/genetlink.c:783 [inline] [<...>] genl_rcv_msg+0x341/0x5a0 net/netlink/genetlink.c:800 [<...>] netlink_rcv_skb+0x14d/0x440 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2515 [<...>] genl_rcv+0x29/0x40 net/netlink/genetlink.c:811 [<...>] netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1313 [inline] [<...>] netlink_unicast+0x54b/0x800 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1339 [<...>] netlink_sendmsg+0x90a/0xdf0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1934 [<...>] sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:651 [inline] [<...>] sock_sendmsg+0x157/0x190 net/socket.c:671 [<...>] _syssendmsg+0x712/0x870 net/socket.c:2342 [<...>] _sys_sendmsg+0xf8/0x170 net/socket.c:2396 [<...>] __sys_sendmsg+0xea/0x1b0 net/socket.c:2429 [<...>] do_syscall_64+0x30/0x40 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46 [<...>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x61/0xc6
Found by InfoTeCS on behalf of Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Syzkaller
PM: merged via the LSM tree at Jakub Kicinski request
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
fs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agpref
Both db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of the db_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check for db_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.
The following is related bug reported by Syzbot:
UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20 index 7936 is out of range for type 'atomic_t[128]'
Add checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are valid indexes for the db_agfree array.(CVE-2023-52804)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
jfs: fix array-index-out-of-bounds in diAlloc
Currently there is not check against the agno of the iag while allocating new inodes to avoid fragmentation problem. Added the check which is required.(CVE-2023-52805)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: libfc: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference in fc_lport_ptp_setup()
fc_lport_ptp_setup() did not check the return value of fc_rport_create() which can return NULL and would cause a NULL pointer dereference. Address this issue by checking return value of fc_rport_create() and log error message on fc_rport_create() failed.(CVE-2023-52809)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu: Fix a null pointer access when the smc_rreg pointer is NULL
In certain types of chips, such as VEGA20, reading the amdgpu_regs_smc file could result in an abnormal null pointer access when the smc_rreg pointer is NULL. Below are the steps to reproduce this issue and the corresponding exception log:
- Navigate to the directory: /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0
- Execute command: cat amdgpu_regs_smc
- Exception Log:: [4005007.702554] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000 [4005007.702562] #PF: supervisor instruction fetch in kernel mode [4005007.702567] #PF: error_code(0x0010) - not-present page [4005007.702570] PGD 0 P4D 0 [4005007.702576] Oops: 0010 [#1] SMP NOPTI [4005007.702581] CPU: 4 PID: 62563 Comm: cat Tainted: G OE 5.15.0-43-generic #46-Ubunt u [4005007.702590] RIP: 0010:0x0 [4005007.702598] Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at RIP 0xffffffffffffffd6. [4005007.702600] RSP: 0018:ffffa82b46d27da0 EFLAGS: 00010206 [4005007.702605] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffffa82b46d27e68 [4005007.702609] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff9940656e0000 [4005007.702612] RBP: ffffa82b46d27dd8 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff994060c07980 [4005007.702615] R10: 0000000000020000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 00007f5e06753000 [4005007.702618] R13: ffff9940656e0000 R14: ffffa82b46d27e68 R15: 00007f5e06753000 [4005007.702622] FS: 00007f5e0755b740(0000) GS:ffff99479d300000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [4005007.702626] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [4005007.702629] CR2: ffffffffffffffd6 CR3: 00000003253fc000 CR4: 00000000003506e0 [4005007.702633] Call Trace: [4005007.702636] <TASK> [4005007.702640] amdgpu_debugfs_regs_smc_read+0xb0/0x120 [amdgpu] [4005007.703002] full_proxy_read+0x5c/0x80 [4005007.703011] vfs_read+0x9f/0x1a0 [4005007.703019] ksys_read+0x67/0xe0 [4005007.703023] __x64_sys_read+0x19/0x20 [4005007.703028] do_syscall_64+0x5c/0xc0 [4005007.703034] ? do_user_addr_fault+0x1e3/0x670 [4005007.703040] ? exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x37/0xb0 [4005007.703047] ? irqentry_exit_to_user_mode+0x9/0x20 [4005007.703052] ? irqentry_exit+0x19/0x30 [4005007.703057] ? exc_page_fault+0x89/0x160 [4005007.703062] ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x8/0x30 [4005007.703068] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [4005007.703075] RIP: 0033:0x7f5e07672992 [4005007.703079] Code: c0 e9 b2 fe ff ff 50 48 8d 3d fa b2 0c 00 e8 c5 1d 02 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 10 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 56 c3 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 83 e c 28 48 89 54 24 [4005007.703083] RSP: 002b:00007ffe03097898 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000000 [4005007.703088] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000020000 RCX: 00007f5e07672992 [4005007.703091] RDX: 0000000000020000 RSI: 00007f5e06753000 RDI: 0000000000000003 [4005007.703094] RBP: 00007f5e06753000 R08: 00007f5e06752010 R09: 00007f5e06752010 [4005007.703096] R10: 0000000000000022 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000022000 [4005007.703099] R13: 0000000000000003 R14: 0000000000020000 R15: 0000000000020000 [4005007.703105] </TASK> [4005007.703107] Modules linked in: nf_tables libcrc32c nfnetlink algif_hash af_alg binfmt_misc nls_ iso8859_1 ipmi_ssif ast intel_rapl_msr intel_rapl_common drm_vram_helper drm_ttm_helper amd64_edac t tm edac_mce_amd kvm_amd ccp mac_hid k10temp kvm acpi_ipmi ipmi_si rapl sch_fq_codel ipmi_devintf ipm i_msghandler msr parport_pc ppdev lp parport mtd pstore_blk efi_pstore ramoops pstore_zone reed_solo mon ip_tables x_tables autofs4 ib_uverbs ib_core amdgpu(OE) amddrm_ttm_helper(OE) amdttm(OE) iommu_v 2 amd_sched(OE) amdkcl(OE) drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_sys_fops cec rc_core drm igb ahci xhci_pci libahci i2c_piix4 i2c_algo_bit xhci_pci_renesas dca [4005007.703184] CR2: 0000000000000000 [4005007.703188] ---[ en ---truncated---(CVE-2023-52817)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd: Fix UBSAN array-index-out-of-bounds for SMU7
For pptable structs that use flexible array sizes, use flexible arrays.(CVE-2023-52818)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
perf/core: Bail out early if the request AUX area is out of bound
When perf-record with a large AUX area, e.g 4GB, it fails with:
#perf record -C 0 -m ,4G -e arm_spe_0// -- sleep 1
failed to mmap with 12 (Cannot allocate memory)
and it reveals a WARNING with __alloc_pages():
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 44 PID: 17573 at mm/page_alloc.c:5568 __alloc_pages+0x1ec/0x248
Call trace:
__alloc_pages+0x1ec/0x248
__kmalloc_large_node+0xc0/0x1f8
__kmalloc_node+0x134/0x1e8
rb_alloc_aux+0xe0/0x298
perf_mmap+0x440/0x660
mmap_region+0x308/0x8a8
do_mmap+0x3c0/0x528
vm_mmap_pgoff+0xf4/0x1b8
ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x18c/0x218
__arm64_sys_mmap+0x38/0x58
invoke_syscall+0x50/0x128
el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x58/0x188
do_el0_svc+0x34/0x50
el0_svc+0x34/0x108
el0t_64_sync_handler+0xb8/0xc0
el0t_64_sync+0x1a4/0x1a8
'rb->aux_pages' allocated by kcalloc() is a pointer array which is used to maintains AUX trace pages. The allocated page for this array is physically contiguous (and virtually contiguous) with an order of 0..MAX_ORDER. If the size of pointer array crosses the limitation set by MAX_ORDER, it reveals a WARNING.
So bail out early with -ENOMEM if the request AUX area is out of bound, e.g.:
#perf record -C 0 -m ,4G -e arm_spe_0// -- sleep 1
failed to mmap with 12 (Cannot allocate memory)(CVE-2023-52835)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Input: synaptics-rmi4 - fix use after free in rmi_unregister_function()
The put_device() calls rmi_release_function() which frees "fn" so the dereference on the next line "fn->num_of_irqs" is a use after free. Move the put_device() to the end to fix this.(CVE-2023-52840)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
media: vidtv: psi: Add check for kstrdup
Add check for the return value of kstrdup() and return the error if it fails in order to avoid NULL pointer dereference.(CVE-2023-52844)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tipc: Change nla_policy for bearer-related names to NLA_NUL_STRING
syzbot reported the following uninit-value access issue [1]:
===================================================== BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in strlen lib/string.c:418 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in strstr+0xb8/0x2f0 lib/string.c:756 strlen lib/string.c:418 [inline] strstr+0xb8/0x2f0 lib/string.c:756 tipc_nl_node_reset_link_stats+0x3ea/0xb50 net/tipc/node.c:2595 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit net/netlink/genetlink.c:971 [inline] genl_family_rcv_msg net/netlink/genetlink.c:1051 [inline] genl_rcv_msg+0x11ec/0x1290 net/netlink/genetlink.c:1066 netlink_rcv_skb+0x371/0x650 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2545 genl_rcv+0x40/0x60 net/netlink/genetlink.c:1075 netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1342 [inline] netlink_unicast+0xf47/0x1250 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1368 netlink_sendmsg+0x1238/0x13d0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1910 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline] sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:753 [inline] _syssendmsg+0x9c2/0xd60 net/socket.c:2541 _sys_sendmsg+0x28d/0x3c0 net/socket.c:2595 __sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2624 [inline] __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2633 [inline] __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2631 [inline] __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x307/0x490 net/socket.c:2631 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
Uninit was created at: slab_post_alloc_hook+0x12f/0xb70 mm/slab.h:767 slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3478 [inline] kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x577/0xa80 mm/slub.c:3523 kmalloc_reserve+0x13d/0x4a0 net/core/skbuff.c:559 __alloc_skb+0x318/0x740 net/core/skbuff.c:650 alloc_skb include/linux/skbuff.h:1286 [inline] netlink_alloc_large_skb net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1214 [inline] netlink_sendmsg+0xb34/0x13d0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1885 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline] sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:753 [inline] _syssendmsg+0x9c2/0xd60 net/socket.c:2541 _sys_sendmsg+0x28d/0x3c0 net/socket.c:2595 __sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2624 [inline] __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2633 [inline] __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2631 [inline] __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x307/0x490 net/socket.c:2631 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
TIPC bearer-related names including link names must be null-terminated strings. If a link name which is not null-terminated is passed through netlink, strstr() and similar functions can cause buffer overrun. This causes the above issue.
This patch changes the nla_policy for bearer-related names from NLA_STRING to NLA_NUL_STRING. This resolves the issue by ensuring that only null-terminated strings are accepted as bearer-related names.
syzbot reported similar uninit-value issue related to bearer names [2]. The root cause of this issue is that a non-null-terminated bearer name was passed. This patch also resolved this issue.(CVE-2023-52845)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
hsr: Prevent use after free in prp_create_tagged_frame()
The prp_fill_rct() function can fail. In that situation, it frees the skb and returns NULL. Meanwhile on the success path, it returns the original skb. So it's straight forward to fix bug by using the returned value.(CVE-2023-52846)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
media: bttv: fix use after free error due to btv->timeout timer
There may be some a race condition between timer function bttv_irq_timeout and bttv_remove. The timer is setup in probe and there is no timer_delete operation in remove function. When it hit kfree btv, the function might still be invoked, which will cause use after free bug.
This bug is found by static analysis, it may be false positive.
Fix it by adding del_timer_sync invoking to the remove function.
cpu0 cpu1 bttv_probe ->timer_setup ->bttv_set_dma ->mod_timer; bttv_remove ->kfree(btv); ->bttv_irq_timeout ->USE btv(CVE-2023-52847)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
padata: Fix refcnt handling in padata_free_shell()
In a high-load arm64 environment, the pcrypt_aead01 test in LTP can lead to system UAF (Use-After-Free) issues. Due to the lengthy analysis of the pcrypt_aead01 function call, I'll describe the problem scenario using a simplified model:
Suppose there's a user of padata named user_function that adheres to
the padata requirement of calling padata_free_shell after serial()
has been invoked, as demonstrated in the following code:
struct request {
struct padata_priv padata;
struct completion *done;
};
void parallel(struct padata_priv *padata) {
do_something();
}
void serial(struct padata_priv *padata) {
struct request *request = container_of(padata,
struct request,
padata);
complete(request->done);
}
void user_function() {
DECLARE_COMPLETION(done)
padata->parallel = parallel;
padata->serial = serial;
padata_do_parallel();
wait_for_completion(&done);
padata_free_shell();
}
In the corresponding padata.c file, there's the following code:
static void padata_serial_worker(struct work_struct *serial_work) {
...
cnt = 0;
while (!list_empty(&local_list)) {
...
padata->serial(padata);
cnt++;
}
local_bh_enable();
if (refcount_sub_and_test(cnt, &pd->refcnt))
padata_free_pd(pd);
}
Because of the high system load and the accumulation of unexecuted
softirq at this moment, local_bh_enable() in padata takes longer
to execute than usual. Subsequently, when accessing pd->refcnt,
pd has already been released by padata_free_shell(), resulting
in a UAF issue with pd->refcnt.
The fix is straightforward: add refcount_dec_and_test before calling
padata_free_pd in padata_free_shell.(CVE-2023-52854)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
clk: mediatek: clk-mt7629: Add check for mtk_alloc_clk_data
Add the check for the return value of mtk_alloc_clk_data() in order to avoid NULL pointer dereference.(CVE-2023-52858)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
hwmon: (axi-fan-control) Fix possible NULL pointer dereference
axi_fan_control_irq_handler(), dependent on the private axi_fan_control_data structure, might be called before the hwmon device is registered. That will cause an "Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference" error.(CVE-2023-52863)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/radeon: possible buffer overflow
Buffer 'afmt_status' of size 6 could overflow, since index 'afmt_idx' is checked after access.(CVE-2023-52867)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
thermal: core: prevent potential string overflow
The dev->id value comes from ida_alloc() so it's a number between zero and INT_MAX. If it's too high then these sprintf()s will overflow.(CVE-2023-52868)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
pstore/platform: Add check for kstrdup
Add check for the return value of kstrdup() and return the error if it fails in order to avoid NULL pointer dereference.(CVE-2023-52869)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
clk: mediatek: clk-mt7629-eth: Add check for mtk_alloc_clk_data
Add the check for the return value of mtk_alloc_clk_data() in order to avoid NULL pointer dereference.(CVE-2023-52876)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tracing: Have trace_event_file have ref counters
The following can crash the kernel:
# cd /sys/kernel/tracing # echo 'p:sched schedule' > kprobe_events # exec 5>>events/kprobes/sched/enable # > kprobe_events # exec 5>&-
The above commands:
- Change directory to the tracefs directory
- Create a kprobe event (doesn't matter what one)
- Open bash file descriptor 5 on the enable file of the kprobe event
- Delete the kprobe event (removes the files too)
- Close the bash file descriptor 5
The above causes a crash!
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000028 #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI CPU: 6 PID: 877 Comm: bash Not tainted 6.5.0-rc4-test-00008-g2c6b6b1029d4-dirty #186 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:tracing_release_file_tr+0xc/0x50
What happens here is that the kprobe event creates a trace_event_file "file" descriptor that represents the file in tracefs to the event. It maintains state of the event (is it enabled for the given instance?). Opening the "enable" file gets a reference to the event "file" descriptor via the open file descriptor. When the kprobe event is deleted, the file is also deleted from the tracefs system which also frees the event "file" descriptor.
But as the tracefs file is still opened by user space, it will not be totally removed until the final dput() is called on it. But this is not true with the event "file" descriptor that is already freed. If the user does a write to or simply closes the file descriptor it will reference the event "file" descriptor that was just freed, causing a use-after-free bug.
To solve this, add a ref count to the event "file" descriptor as well as a new flag called "FREED". The "file" will not be freed until the last reference is released. But the FREE flag will be set when the event is removed to prevent any more modifications to that event from happening, even if there's still a reference to the event "file" descriptor.(CVE-2023-52879)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: nf_tables: mark set as dead when unbinding anonymous set with timeout
While the rhashtable set gc runs asynchronously, a race allows it to collect elements from anonymous sets with timeouts while it is being released from the commit path.
Mingi Cho originally reported this issue in a different path in 6.1.x with a pipapo set with low timeouts which is not possible upstream since 7395dfacfff6 ("netfilter: nf_tables: use timestamp to check for set element timeout").
Fix this by setting on the dead flag for anonymous sets to skip async gc in this case.
According to 08e4c8c5919f ("netfilter: nf_tables: mark newset as dead on transaction abort"), Florian plans to accelerate abort path by releasing objects via workqueue, therefore, this sets on the dead flag for abort path too.(CVE-2024-26643)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wireguard: netlink: access device through ctx instead of peer
The previous commit fixed a bug that led to a NULL peer->device being dereferenced. It's actually easier and faster performance-wise to instead get the device from ctx->wg. This semantically makes more sense too, since ctx->wg->peer_allowedips.seq is compared with ctx->allowedips_seq, basing them both in ctx. This also acts as a defence in depth provision against freed peers.(CVE-2024-26950)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nilfs2: prevent kernel bug at submit_bh_wbc()
Fix a bug where nilfs_get_block() returns a successful status when searching and inserting the specified block both fail inconsistently. If this inconsistent behavior is not due to a previously fixed bug, then an unexpected race is occurring, so return a temporary error -EAGAIN instead.
This prevents callers such as __block_write_begin_int() from requesting a read into a buffer that is not mapped, which would cause the BUG_ON check for the BH_Mapped flag in submit_bh_wbc() to fail.(CVE-2024-26955)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
s390/zcrypt: fix reference counting on zcrypt card objects
Tests with hot-plugging crytpo cards on KVM guests with debug kernel build revealed an use after free for the load field of the struct zcrypt_card. The reason was an incorrect reference handling of the zcrypt card object which could lead to a free of the zcrypt card object while it was still in use.
This is an example of the slab message:
kernel: 0x00000000885a7512-0x00000000885a7513 @offset=1298. First byte 0x68 instead of 0x6b
kernel: Allocated in zcrypt_card_alloc+0x36/0x70 [zcrypt] age=18046 cpu=3 pid=43
kernel: kmalloc_trace+0x3f2/0x470
kernel: zcrypt_card_alloc+0x36/0x70 [zcrypt]
kernel: zcrypt_cex4_card_probe+0x26/0x380 [zcrypt_cex4]
kernel: ap_device_probe+0x15c/0x290
kernel: really_probe+0xd2/0x468
kernel: driver_probe_device+0x40/0xf0
kernel: __device_attach_driver+0xc0/0x140
kernel: bus_for_each_drv+0x8c/0xd0
kernel: __device_attach+0x114/0x198
kernel: bus_probe_device+0xb4/0xc8
kernel: device_add+0x4d2/0x6e0
kernel: ap_scan_adapter+0x3d0/0x7c0
kernel: ap_scan_bus+0x5a/0x3b0
kernel: ap_scan_bus_wq_callback+0x40/0x60
kernel: process_one_work+0x26e/0x620
kernel: worker_thread+0x21c/0x440
kernel: Freed in zcrypt_card_put+0x54/0x80 [zcrypt] age=9024 cpu=3 pid=43
kernel: kfree+0x37e/0x418
kernel: zcrypt_card_put+0x54/0x80 [zcrypt]
kernel: ap_device_remove+0x4c/0xe0
kernel: device_release_driver_internal+0x1c4/0x270
kernel: bus_remove_device+0x100/0x188
kernel: device_del+0x164/0x3c0
kernel: device_unregister+0x30/0x90
kernel: ap_scan_adapter+0xc8/0x7c0
kernel: ap_scan_bus+0x5a/0x3b0
kernel: ap_scan_bus_wq_callback+0x40/0x60
kernel: process_one_work+0x26e/0x620
kernel: worker_thread+0x21c/0x440
kernel: kthread+0x150/0x168
kernel: __ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x58
kernel: ret_from_fork+0xa/0x30
kernel: Slab 0x00000372022169c0 objects=20 used=18 fp=0x00000000885a7c88 flags=0x3ffff00000000a00(workingset|slab|node=0|zone=1|lastcpupid=0x1ffff)
kernel: Object 0x00000000885a74b8 @offset=1208 fp=0x00000000885a7c88
kernel: Redzone 00000000885a74b0: bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb ........
kernel: Object 00000000885a74b8: 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
kernel: Object 00000000885a74c8: 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
kernel: Object 00000000885a74d8: 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
kernel: Object 00000000885a74e8: 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
kernel: Object 00000000885a74f8: 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
kernel: Object 00000000885a7508: 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 68 4b 6b 6b 6b a5 kkkkkkkkkkhKkkk.
kernel: Redzone 00000000885a7518: bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb ........
kernel: Padding 00000000885a756c: 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a ZZZZZZZZZZZZ
kernel: CPU: 0 PID: 387 Comm: systemd-udevd Not tainted 6.8.0-HF #2
kernel: Hardware name: IBM 3931 A01 704 (KVM/Linux)
kernel: Call Trace:
kernel: [<00000000ca5ab5b8>] dump_stack_lvl+0x90/0x120
kernel: [<00000000c99d78bc>] check_bytes_and_report+0x114/0x140
kernel: [<00000000c99d53cc>] check_object+0x334/0x3f8
kernel: [<00000000c99d820c>] alloc_debug_processing+0xc4/0x1f8
kernel: [<00000000c99d852e>] get_partial_node.part.0+0x1ee/0x3e0
kernel: [<00000000c99d94ec>] ___slab_alloc+0xaf4/0x13c8
kernel: [<00000000c99d9e38>] __slab_alloc.constprop.0+0x78/0xb8
kernel: [<00000000c99dc8dc>] __kmalloc+0x434/0x590
kernel: [<00000000c9b4c0ce>] ext4_htree_store_dirent+0x4e/0x1c0
kernel: [<00000000c9b908a2>] htree_dirblock_to_tree+0x17a/0x3f0
kernel:
---truncated---(CVE-2024-26957)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nfs: fix UAF in direct writes
In production we have been hitting the following warning consistently
------------[ cut here ]------------ refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free. WARNING: CPU: 17 PID: 1800359 at lib/refcount.c:28 refcount_warn_saturate+0x9c/0xe0 Workqueue: nfsiod nfs_direct_write_schedule_work [nfs] RIP: 0010:refcount_warn_saturate+0x9c/0xe0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> ? __warn+0x9f/0x130 ? refcount_warn_saturate+0x9c/0xe0 ? report_bug+0xcc/0x150 ? handle_bug+0x3d/0x70 ? exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x40 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20 ? refcount_warn_saturate+0x9c/0xe0 nfs_direct_write_schedule_work+0x237/0x250 [nfs] process_one_work+0x12f/0x4a0 worker_thread+0x14e/0x3b0 ? ZSTD_getCParams_internal+0x220/0x220 kthread+0xdc/0x120 ? __btf_name_valid+0xa0/0xa0 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
This is because we're completing the nfs_direct_request twice in a row.
The source of this is when we have our commit requests to submit, we process them and send them off, and then in the completion path for the commit requests we have
if (nfs_commit_end(cinfo.mds)) nfs_direct_write_complete(dreq);
However since we're submitting asynchronous requests we sometimes have one that completes before we submit the next one, so we end up calling complete on the nfs_direct_request twice.
The only other place we use nfs_generic_commit_list() is in __nfs_commit_inode, which wraps this call in a
nfs_commit_begin(); nfs_commit_end();
Which is a common pattern for this style of completion handling, one that is also repeated in the direct code with get_dreq()/put_dreq() calls around where we process events as well as in the completion paths.
Fix this by using the same pattern for the commit requests.
Before with my 200 node rocksdb stress running this warning would pop every 10ish minutes. With my patch the stress test has been running for several hours without popping.(CVE-2024-26958)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mac802154: fix llsec key resources release in mac802154_llsec_key_del
mac802154_llsec_key_del() can free resources of a key directly without following the RCU rules for waiting before the end of a grace period. This may lead to use-after-free in case llsec_lookup_key() is traversing the list of keys in parallel with a key deletion:
refcount_t: addition on 0; use-after-free. WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 16000 at lib/refcount.c:25 refcount_warn_saturate+0x162/0x2a0 Modules linked in: CPU: 4 PID: 16000 Comm: wpan-ping Not tainted 6.7.0 #19 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:refcount_warn_saturate+0x162/0x2a0 Call Trace: <TASK> llsec_lookup_key.isra.0+0x890/0x9e0 mac802154_llsec_encrypt+0x30c/0x9c0 ieee802154_subif_start_xmit+0x24/0x1e0 dev_hard_start_xmit+0x13e/0x690 sch_direct_xmit+0x2ae/0xbc0 __dev_queue_xmit+0x11dd/0x3c20 dgram_sendmsg+0x90b/0xd60 __sys_sendto+0x466/0x4c0 __x64_sys_sendto+0xe0/0x1c0 do_syscall_64+0x45/0xf0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76
Also, ieee802154_llsec_key_entry structures are not freed by mac802154_llsec_key_del():
unreferenced object 0xffff8880613b6980 (size 64): comm "iwpan", pid 2176, jiffies 4294761134 (age 60.475s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 78 0d 8f 18 80 88 ff ff 22 01 00 00 00 00 ad de x......."....... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 03 00 cd ab 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [<ffffffff81dcfa62>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x1e2/0x2d0 [<ffffffff81c43865>] kmalloc_trace+0x25/0xc0 [<ffffffff88968b09>] mac802154_llsec_key_add+0xac9/0xcf0 [<ffffffff8896e41a>] ieee802154_add_llsec_key+0x5a/0x80 [<ffffffff8892adc6>] nl802154_add_llsec_key+0x426/0x5b0 [<ffffffff86ff293e>] genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0x1fe/0x2f0 [<ffffffff86ff46d1>] genl_rcv_msg+0x531/0x7d0 [<ffffffff86fee7a9>] netlink_rcv_skb+0x169/0x440 [<ffffffff86ff1d88>] genl_rcv+0x28/0x40 [<ffffffff86fec15c>] netlink_unicast+0x53c/0x820 [<ffffffff86fecd8b>] netlink_sendmsg+0x93b/0xe60 [<ffffffff86b91b35>] _syssendmsg+0xac5/0xca0 [<ffffffff86b9c3dd>] _sys_sendmsg+0x11d/0x1c0 [<ffffffff86b9c65a>] __sys_sendmsg+0xfa/0x1d0 [<ffffffff88eadbf5>] do_syscall_64+0x45/0xf0 [<ffffffff890000ea>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76
Handle the proper resource release in the RCU callback function mac802154_llsec_key_del_rcu().
Note that if llsec_lookup_key() finds a key, it gets a refcount via llsec_key_get() and locally copies key id from key_entry (which is a list element). So it's safe to call llsec_key_put() and free the list entry after the RCU grace period elapses.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org).(CVE-2024-26961)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
clk: qcom: mmcc-msm8974: fix terminating of frequency table arrays
The frequency table arrays are supposed to be terminated with an empty element. Add such entry to the end of the arrays where it is missing in order to avoid possible out-of-bound access when the table is traversed by functions like qcom_find_freq() or qcom_find_freq_floor().
Only compile tested.(CVE-2024-26965)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ubifs: ubifs_symlink: Fix memleak of inode->i_link in error path
For error handling path in ubifs_symlink(), inode will be marked as bad first, then iput() is invoked. If inode->i_link is initialized by fscrypt_encrypt_symlink() in encryption scenario, inode->i_link won't be freed by callchain ubifs_free_inode -> fscrypt_free_inode in error handling path, because make_bad_inode() has changed 'inode->i_mode' as 'S_IFREG'. Following kmemleak is easy to be reproduced by injecting error in ubifs_jnl_update() when doing symlink in encryption scenario: unreferenced object 0xffff888103da3d98 (size 8): comm "ln", pid 1692, jiffies 4294914701 (age 12.045s) backtrace: kmemdup+0x32/0x70 __fscrypt_encrypt_symlink+0xed/0x1c0 ubifs_symlink+0x210/0x300 [ubifs] vfs_symlink+0x216/0x360 do_symlinkat+0x11a/0x190 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xe0 There are two ways fixing it: 1. Remove make_bad_inode() in error handling path. We can do that because ubifs_evict_inode() will do same processes for good symlink inode and bad symlink inode, for inode->i_nlink checking is before is_bad_inode(). 2. Free inode->i_link before marking inode bad. Method 2 is picked, it has less influence, personally, I think.(CVE-2024-26972)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
KVM: Always flush async #PF workqueue when vCPU is being destroyed
Always flush the per-vCPU async #PF workqueue when a vCPU is clearing its completion queue, e.g. when a VM and all its vCPUs is being destroyed. KVM must ensure that none of its workqueue callbacks is running when the last reference to the KVM module is put. Gifting a reference to the associated VM prevents the workqueue callback from dereferencing freed vCPU/VM memory, but does not prevent the KVM module from being unloaded before the callback completes.
Drop the misguided VM refcount gifting, as calling kvm_put_kvm() from async_pf_execute() if kvm_put_kvm() flushes the async #PF workqueue will result in deadlock. async_pf_execute() can't return until kvm_put_kvm() finishes, and kvm_put_kvm() can't return until async_pf_execute() finishes:
WARNING: CPU: 8 PID: 251 at virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:1435 kvm_put_kvm+0x2d/0x320 [kvm] Modules linked in: vhost_net vhost vhost_iotlb tap kvm_intel kvm irqbypass CPU: 8 PID: 251 Comm: kworker/8:1 Tainted: G W 6.6.0-rc1-e7af8d17224a-x86/gmem-vm #119 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 Workqueue: events async_pf_execute [kvm] RIP: 0010:kvm_put_kvm+0x2d/0x320 [kvm] Call Trace: <TASK> async_pf_execute+0x198/0x260 [kvm] process_one_work+0x145/0x2d0 worker_thread+0x27e/0x3a0 kthread+0xba/0xe0 ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x50 ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 </TASK> ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- INFO: task kworker/8:1:251 blocked for more than 120 seconds. Tainted: G W 6.6.0-rc1-e7af8d17224a-x86/gmem-vm #119 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:kworker/8:1 state:D stack:0 pid:251 ppid:2 flags:0x00004000 Workqueue: events async_pf_execute [kvm] Call Trace: <TASK> __schedule+0x33f/0xa40 schedule+0x53/0xc0 schedule_timeout+0x12a/0x140 __wait_for_common+0x8d/0x1d0 __flush_work.isra.0+0x19f/0x2c0 kvm_clear_async_pf_completion_queue+0x129/0x190 [kvm] kvm_arch_destroy_vm+0x78/0x1b0 [kvm] kvm_put_kvm+0x1c1/0x320 [kvm] async_pf_execute+0x198/0x260 [kvm] process_one_work+0x145/0x2d0 worker_thread+0x27e/0x3a0 kthread+0xba/0xe0 ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x50 ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 </TASK>
If kvm_clear_async_pf_completion_queue() actually flushes the workqueue, then there's no need to gift async_pf_execute() a reference because all invocations of async_pf_execute() will be forced to complete before the vCPU and its VM are destroyed/freed. And that in turn fixes the module unloading bug as __fput() won't do module_put() on the last vCPU reference until the vCPU has been freed, e.g. if closing the vCPU file also puts the last reference to the KVM module.
Note that kvm_check_async_pf_completion() may also take the work item off the completion queue and so also needs to flush the work queue, as the work will not be seen by kvm_clear_async_pf_completion_queue(). Waiting on the workqueue could theoretically delay a vCPU due to waiting for the work to complete, but that's a very, very small chance, and likely a very small delay. kvm_arch_async_page_present_queued() unconditionally makes a new request, i.e. will effectively delay entering the guest, so the remaining work is really just:
trace_kvm_async_pf_completed(addr, cr2_or_gpa);
__kvm_vcpu_wake_up(vcpu);
mmput(mm);
and mmput() can't drop the last reference to the page tables if the vCPU is still alive, i.e. the vCPU won't get stuck tearing down page tables.
Add a helper to do the flushing, specifically to deal with "wakeup all" work items, as they aren't actually work items, i.e. are never placed in a workqueue. Trying to flush a bogus workqueue entry rightly makes __flush_work() complain (kudos to whoever added that sanity check).
Note, commit 5f6de5cbebee ("KVM: Prevent module exit until al ---truncated---(CVE-2024-26976)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Squashfs: check the inode number is not the invalid value of zero
Syskiller has produced an out of bounds access in fill_meta_index().
That out of bounds access is ultimately caused because the inode has an inode number with the invalid value of zero, which was not checked.
The reason this causes the out of bounds access is due to following sequence of events:
-
Fill_meta_index() is called to allocate (via empty_meta_index()) and fill a metadata index. It however suffers a data read error and aborts, invalidating the newly returned empty metadata index. It does this by setting the inode number of the index to zero, which means unused (zero is not a valid inode number).
-
When fill_meta_index() is subsequently called again on another read operation, locate_meta_index() returns the previous index because it matches the inode number of 0. Because this index has been returned it is expected to have been filled, and because it hasn't been, an out of bounds access is performed.
This patch adds a sanity check which checks that the inode number is not zero when the inode is created and returns -EINVAL if it is.
[phillip@squashfs.org.uk: whitespace fix] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240409204723.446925-1-phillip@squashfs.org.uk(CVE-2024-26982)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
fs: sysfs: Fix reference leak in sysfs_break_active_protection()
The sysfs_break_active_protection() routine has an obvious reference leak in its error path. If the call to kernfs_find_and_get() fails then kn will be NULL, so the companion sysfs_unbreak_active_protection() routine won't get called (and would only cause an access violation by trying to dereference kn->parent if it was called). As a result, the reference to kobj acquired at the start of the function will never be released.
Fix the leak by adding an explicit kobject_put() call when kn is NULL.(CVE-2024-26993)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
speakup: Avoid crash on very long word
In case a console is set up really large and contains a really long word (> 256 characters), we have to stop before the length of the word buffer.(CVE-2024-26994)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
serial/pmac_zilog: Remove flawed mitigation for rx irq flood
The mitigation was intended to stop the irq completely. That may be better than a hard lock-up but it turns out that you get a crash anyway if you're using pmac_zilog as a serial console:
ttyPZ0: pmz: rx irq flood ! BUG: spinlock recursion on CPU#0, swapper/0
That's because the pr_err() call in pmz_receive_chars() results in pmz_console_write() attempting to lock a spinlock already locked in pmz_interrupt(). With CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK=y, this produces a fatal BUG splat. The spinlock in question is the one in struct uart_port.
Even when it's not fatal, the serial port rx function ceases to work. Also, the iteration limit doesn't play nicely with QEMU, as can be seen in the bug report linked below.
A web search for other reports of the error message "pmz: rx irq flood" didn't produce anything. So I don't think this code is needed any more. Remove it.(CVE-2024-26999)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
serial: mxs-auart: add spinlock around changing cts state
The uart_handle_cts_change() function in serial_core expects the caller to hold uport->lock. For example, I have seen the below kernel splat, when the Bluetooth driver is loaded on an i.MX28 board.
[ 85.119255] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 85.124413] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 27 at /drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c:3453 uart_handle_cts_change+0xb4/0xec
[ 85.134694] Modules linked in: hci_uart bluetooth ecdh_generic ecc wlcore_sdio configfs
[ 85.143314] CPU: 0 PID: 27 Comm: kworker/u3:0 Not tainted 6.6.3-00021-gd62a2f068f92 #1
[ 85.151396] Hardware name: Freescale MXS (Device Tree)
[ 85.156679] Workqueue: hci0 hci_power_on [bluetooth]
(...)
[ 85.191765] uart_handle_cts_change from mxs_auart_irq_handle+0x380/0x3f4
[ 85.198787] mxs_auart_irq_handle from __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x88/0x210
(...)(CVE-2024-27000)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm: nv04: Fix out of bounds access
When Output Resource (dcb->or) value is assigned in fabricate_dcb_output(), there may be out of bounds access to dac_users array in case dcb->or is zero because ffs(dcb->or) is used as index there. The 'or' argument of fabricate_dcb_output() must be interpreted as a number of bit to set, not value.
Utilize macros from 'enum nouveau_or' in calls instead of hardcoding.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2024-27008)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/sched: Fix mirred deadlock on device recursion
When the mirred action is used on a classful egress qdisc and a packet is mirrored or redirected to self we hit a qdisc lock deadlock. See trace below.
[..... other info removed for brevity....] [ 82.890906] [ 82.890906] ============================================ [ 82.890906] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected [ 82.890906] 6.8.0-05205-g77fadd89fe2d-dirty #213 Tainted: G W [ 82.890906] -------------------------------------------- [ 82.890906] ping/418 is trying to acquire lock: [ 82.890906] ffff888006994110 (&sch->q.lock){+.-.}-{3:3}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x1778/0x3550 [ 82.890906] [ 82.890906] but task is already holding lock: [ 82.890906] ffff888006994110 (&sch->q.lock){+.-.}-{3:3}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x1778/0x3550 [ 82.890906] [ 82.890906] other info that might help us debug this: [ 82.890906] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 82.890906] [ 82.890906] CPU0 [ 82.890906] ---- [ 82.890906] lock(&sch->q.lock); [ 82.890906] lock(&sch->q.lock); [ 82.890906] [ 82.890906] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 82.890906] [..... other info removed for brevity....]
Example setup (eth0->eth0) to recreate tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 30 tc filter add dev eth0 handle 1: protocol ip prio 2 matchall \ action mirred egress redirect dev eth0
Another example(eth0->eth1->eth0) to recreate tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 30 tc filter add dev eth0 handle 1: protocol ip prio 2 matchall \ action mirred egress redirect dev eth1
tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: htb default 30 tc filter add dev eth1 handle 1: protocol ip prio 2 matchall \ action mirred egress redirect dev eth0
We fix this by adding an owner field (CPU id) to struct Qdisc set after root qdisc is entered. When the softirq enters it a second time, if the qdisc owner is the same CPU, the packet is dropped to break the loop.(CVE-2024-27010)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: nf_tables: fix memleak in map from abort path
The delete set command does not rely on the transaction object for element removal, therefore, a combination of delete element + delete set from the abort path could result in restoring twice the refcount of the mapping.
Check for inactive element in the next generation for the delete element command in the abort path, skip restoring state if next generation bit has been already cleared. This is similar to the activate logic using the set walk iterator.
[ 6170.286929] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 6170.286939] WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 790302 at net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:2086 nf_tables_chain_destroy+0x1f7/0x220 [nf_tables] [ 6170.287071] Modules linked in: [...] [ 6170.287633] CPU: 6 PID: 790302 Comm: kworker/6:2 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc3+ #365 [ 6170.287768] RIP: 0010:nf_tables_chain_destroy+0x1f7/0x220 [nf_tables] [ 6170.287886] Code: df 48 8d 7d 58 e8 69 2e 3b df 48 8b 7d 58 e8 80 1b 37 df 48 8d 7d 68 e8 57 2e 3b df 48 8b 7d 68 e8 6e 1b 37 df 48 89 ef eb c4 <0f> 0b 48 83 c4 08 5b 5d 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 41 5f c3 cc cc cc cc 0f [ 6170.287895] RSP: 0018:ffff888134b8fd08 EFLAGS: 00010202 [ 6170.287904] RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: ffff888125bffb28 RCX: dffffc0000000000 [ 6170.287912] RDX: 0000000000000003 RSI: ffffffffa20298ab RDI: ffff88811ebe4750 [ 6170.287919] RBP: ffff88811ebe4700 R08: ffff88838e812650 R09: fffffbfff0623a55 [ 6170.287926] R10: ffffffff8311d2af R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff888125bffb10 [ 6170.287933] R13: ffff888125bffb10 R14: dead000000000122 R15: dead000000000100 [ 6170.287940] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff888390b00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 6170.287948] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 6170.287955] CR2: 00007fd31fc00710 CR3: 0000000133f60004 CR4: 00000000001706f0 [ 6170.287962] Call Trace: [ 6170.287967] <TASK> [ 6170.287973] ? __warn+0x9f/0x1a0 [ 6170.287986] ? nf_tables_chain_destroy+0x1f7/0x220 [nf_tables] [ 6170.288092] ? report_bug+0x1b1/0x1e0 [ 6170.287986] ? nf_tables_chain_destroy+0x1f7/0x220 [nf_tables] [ 6170.288092] ? report_bug+0x1b1/0x1e0 [ 6170.288104] ? handle_bug+0x3c/0x70 [ 6170.288112] ? exc_invalid_op+0x17/0x40 [ 6170.288120] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20 [ 6170.288132] ? nf_tables_chain_destroy+0x2b/0x220 [nf_tables] [ 6170.288243] ? nf_tables_chain_destroy+0x1f7/0x220 [nf_tables] [ 6170.288366] ? nf_tables_chain_destroy+0x2b/0x220 [nf_tables] [ 6170.288483] nf_tables_trans_destroy_work+0x588/0x590 nf_tables
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/rds: fix WARNING in rds_conn_connect_if_down
If connection isn't established yet, get_mr() will fail, trigger connection after get_mr().(CVE-2024-27024)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
f2fs: compress: fix to cover normal cluster write with cp_rwsem
When we overwrite compressed cluster w/ normal cluster, we should not unlock cp_rwsem during f2fs_write_raw_pages(), otherwise data will be corrupted if partial blocks were persisted before CP & SPOR, due to cluster metadata wasn't updated atomically.(CVE-2024-27034)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
f2fs: compress: fix to guarantee persisting compressed blocks by CP
If data block in compressed cluster is not persisted with metadata during checkpoint, after SPOR, the data may be corrupted, let's guarantee to write compressed page by checkpoint.(CVE-2024-27035)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
clk: zynq: Prevent null pointer dereference caused by kmalloc failure
The kmalloc() in zynq_clk_setup() will return null if the physical memory has run out. As a result, if we use snprintf() to write data to the null address, the null pointer dereference bug will happen.
This patch uses a stack variable to replace the kmalloc().(CVE-2024-27037)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: Fix a potential buffer overflow in 'dp_dsc_clock_en_read()'
Tell snprintf() to store at most 10 bytes in the output buffer instead of 30.
Fixes the below: drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_debugfs.c:1508 dp_dsc_clock_en_read() error: snprintf() is printing too much 30 vs 10(CVE-2024-27045)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
USB: usb-storage: Prevent divide-by-0 error in isd200_ata_command
The isd200 sub-driver in usb-storage uses the HEADS and SECTORS values in the ATA ID information to calculate cylinder and head values when creating a CDB for READ or WRITE commands. The calculation involves division and modulus operations, which will cause a crash if either of these values is 0. While this never happens with a genuine device, it could happen with a flawed or subversive emulation, as reported by the syzbot fuzzer.
Protect against this possibility by refusing to bind to the device if either the ATA_ID_HEADS or ATA_ID_SECTORS value in the device's ID information is 0. This requires isd200_Initialization() to return a negative error code when initialization fails; currently it always returns 0 (even when there is an error).(CVE-2024-27059)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
media: usbtv: Remove useless locks in usbtv_video_free()
Remove locks calls in usbtv_video_free() because are useless and may led to a deadlock as reported here: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/bisect.txt?x=166dc872180000 Also remove usbtv_stop() call since it will be called when unregistering the device.
Before 'c838530d230b' this issue would only be noticed if you disconnect while streaming and now it is noticeable even when disconnecting while not streaming.
hverkuil: fix minor spelling mistake in log message
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
media: ttpci: fix two memleaks in budget_av_attach
When saa7146_register_device and saa7146_vv_init fails, budget_av_attach should free the resources it allocates, like the error-handling of ttpci_budget_init does. Besides, there are two fixme comment refers to such deallocations.(CVE-2024-27073)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
media: dvb-frontends: avoid stack overflow warnings with clang
A previous patch worked around a KASAN issue in stv0367, now a similar problem showed up with clang:
drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv0367.c:1222:12: error: stack frame size (3624) exceeds limit (2048) in 'stv0367ter_set_frontend' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than] 1214 | static int stv0367ter_set_frontend(struct dvb_frontend *fe)
Rework the stv0367_writereg() function to be simpler and mark both register access functions as noinline_for_stack so the temporary i2c_msg structures do not get duplicated on the stack when KASAN_STACK is enabled.(CVE-2024-27075)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
SUNRPC: fix some memleaks in gssx_dec_option_array
The creds and oa->data need to be freed in the error-handling paths after their allocation. So this patch add these deallocations in the corresponding paths.(CVE-2024-27388)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
pstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is needed
Unloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs would trigger the dput() double-drop warning:
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410
Using the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned in Documentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn't the right approach here, and leads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate() and update the code to not bother checking for error codes that can never happen.
---(CVE-2024-27389)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: nft_flow_offload: reset dst in route object after setting up flow
dst is transferred to the flow object, route object does not own it anymore. Reset dst in route object, otherwise if flow_offload_add() fails, error path releases dst twice, leading to a refcount underflow.(CVE-2024-27403)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
fs/ntfs3: Fixed overflow check in mi_enum_attr()(CVE-2024-27407)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netrom: Fix data-races around sysctl_net_busy_read
We need to protect the reader reading the sysctl value because the value can be changed concurrently.(CVE-2024-27419)
Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.(CVE-2024-27426)
Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.(CVE-2024-27427)
Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.(CVE-2024-27428)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: x86/fpu: Keep xfd_state in sync with MSR_IA32_XFD Commit 672365477ae8 ("x86/fpu: Update XFD state where required") and commit 8bf26758ca96 ("x86/fpu: Add XFD state to fpstate") introduced a per CPU variable xfd_state to keep the MSR_IA32_XFD value cached, in order to avoid unnecessary writes to the MSR. On CPU hotplug MSR_IA32_XFD is reset to the init_fpstate.xfd, which wipes out any stale state. But the per CPU cached xfd value is not reset, which brings them out of sync. As a consequence a subsequent xfd_update_state() might fail to update the MSR which in turn can result in XRSTOR raising a #NM in kernel space, which crashes the kernel. To fix this, introduce xfd_set_state() to write xfd_state together with MSR_IA32_XFD, and use it in all places that set MSR_IA32_XFD.(CVE-2024-35801)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
dm snapshot: fix lockup in dm_exception_table_exit
There was reported lockup when we exit a snapshot with many exceptions. Fix this by adding "cond_resched" to the loop that frees the exceptions.(CVE-2024-35805)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
soc: fsl: qbman: Always disable interrupts when taking cgr_lock
smp_call_function_single disables IRQs when executing the callback. To prevent deadlocks, we must disable IRQs when taking cgr_lock elsewhere. This is already done by qman_update_cgr and qman_delete_cgr; fix the other lockers.(CVE-2024-35806)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
fs/aio: Check IOCB_AIO_RW before the struct aio_kiocb conversion
The first kiocb_set_cancel_fn() argument may point at a struct kiocb that is not embedded inside struct aio_kiocb. With the current code, depending on the compiler, the req->ki_ctx read happens either before the IOCB_AIO_RW test or after that test. Move the req->ki_ctx read such that it is guaranteed that the IOCB_AIO_RW test happens first.(CVE-2024-35815)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu: amdgpu_ttm_gart_bind set gtt bound flag
Otherwise after the GTT bo is released, the GTT and gart space is freed but amdgpu_ttm_backend_unbind will not clear the gart page table entry and leave valid mapping entry pointing to the stale system page. Then if GPU access the gart address mistakely, it will read undefined value instead page fault, harder to debug and reproduce the real issue.(CVE-2024-35817)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
LoongArch: Define the __io_aw() hook as mmiowb()
Commit fb24ea52f78e0d595852e ("drivers: Remove explicit invocations of mmiowb()") remove all mmiowb() in drivers, but it says:
"NOTE: mmiowb() has only ever guaranteed ordering in conjunction with spin_unlock(). However, pairing each mmiowb() removal in this patch with the corresponding call to spin_unlock() is not at all trivial, so there is a small chance that this change may regress any drivers incorrectly relying on mmiowb() to order MMIO writes between CPUs using lock-free synchronisation."
The mmio in radeon_ring_commit() is protected by a mutex rather than a spinlock, but in the mutex fastpath it behaves similar to spinlock. We can add mmiowb() calls in the radeon driver but the maintainer says he doesn't like such a workaround, and radeon is not the only example of mutex protected mmio.
So we should extend the mmiowb tracking system from spinlock to mutex, and maybe other locking primitives. This is not easy and error prone, so we solve it in the architectural code, by simply defining the __io_aw() hook as mmiowb(). And we no longer need to override queued_spin_unlock() so use the generic definition.
Without this, we get such an error when run 'glxgears' on weak ordering architectures such as LoongArch:
radeon 0000:04:00.0: ring 0 stalled for more than 10324msec radeon 0000:04:00.0: ring 3 stalled for more than 10240msec radeon 0000:04:00.0: GPU lockup (current fence id 0x000000000001f412 last fence id 0x000000000001f414 on ring 3) radeon 0000:04:00.0: GPU lockup (current fence id 0x000000000000f940 last fence id 0x000000000000f941 on ring 0) radeon 0000:04:00.0: scheduling IB failed (-35). [drm:radeon_gem_va_ioctl [radeon]] ERROR Couldn't update BO_VA (-35) radeon 0000:04:00.0: scheduling IB failed (-35). [drm:radeon_gem_va_ioctl [radeon]] ERROR Couldn't update BO_VA (-35) radeon 0000:04:00.0: scheduling IB failed (-35). [drm:radeon_gem_va_ioctl [radeon]] ERROR Couldn't update BO_VA (-35) radeon 0000:04:00.0: scheduling IB failed (-35). [drm:radeon_gem_va_ioctl [radeon]] ERROR Couldn't update BO_VA (-35) radeon 0000:04:00.0: scheduling IB failed (-35). [drm:radeon_gem_va_ioctl [radeon]] ERROR Couldn't update BO_VA (-35) radeon 0000:04:00.0: scheduling IB failed (-35). [drm:radeon_gem_va_ioctl [radeon]] ERROR Couldn't update BO_VA (-35) radeon 0000:04:00.0: scheduling IB failed (-35). [drm:radeon_gem_va_ioctl [radeon]] ERROR Couldn't update BO_VA (-35)(CVE-2024-35818)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/mlx5e: fix a double-free in arfs_create_groups
When in allocated by kvzalloc fails, arfs_create_groups will free
ft->g and return an error. However, arfs_create_table, the only caller of
arfs_create_groups, will hold this error and call to
mlx5e_destroy_flow_table, in which the ft->g will be freed again.(CVE-2024-35835)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: bridge: replace physindev with physinif in nf_bridge_info
An skb can be added to a neigh->arp_queue while waiting for an arp reply. Where original skb's skb->dev can be different to neigh's neigh->dev. For instance in case of bridging dnated skb from one veth to another, the skb would be added to a neigh->arp_queue of the bridge.
As skb->dev can be reset back to nf_bridge->physindev and used, and as there is no explicit mechanism that prevents this physindev from been freed under us (for instance neigh_flush_dev doesn't cleanup skbs from different device's neigh queue) we can crash on e.g. this stack:
arp_process neigh_update skb = __skb_dequeue(&neigh->arp_queue) neigh_resolve_output(..., skb) ... br_nf_dev_xmit br_nf_pre_routing_finish_bridge_slow skb->dev = nf_bridge->physindev br_handle_frame_finish
Let's use plain ifindex instead of net_device link. To peek into the original net_device we will use dev_get_by_index_rcu(). Thus either we get device and are safe to use it or we don't get it and drop skb.(CVE-2024-35839)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
f2fs: compress: fix reserve_cblocks counting error when out of space
When a file only needs one direct_node, performing the following operations will cause the file to be unrepairable:
unisoc # ./f2fs_io compress test.apk unisoc #df -h | grep dm-48 /dev/block/dm-48 112G 112G 1.2M 100% /data
unisoc # ./f2fs_io release_cblocks test.apk 924 unisoc # df -h | grep dm-48 /dev/block/dm-48 112G 112G 4.8M 100% /data
unisoc # dd if=/dev/random of=file4 bs=1M count=3 3145728 bytes (3.0 M) copied, 0.025 s, 120 M/s unisoc # df -h | grep dm-48 /dev/block/dm-48 112G 112G 1.8M 100% /data
unisoc # ./f2fs_io reserve_cblocks test.apk F2FS_IOC_RESERVE_COMPRESS_BLOCKS failed: No space left on device
adb reboot unisoc # df -h | grep dm-48 /dev/block/dm-48 112G 112G 11M 100% /data unisoc # ./f2fs_io reserve_cblocks test.apk 0
This is because the file has only one direct_node. After returning to -ENOSPC, reserved_blocks += ret will not be executed. As a result, the reserved_blocks at this time is still 0, which is not the real number of reserved blocks. Therefore, fsck cannot be set to repair the file.
After this patch, the fsck flag will be set to fix this problem.
unisoc # df -h | grep dm-48 /dev/block/dm-48 112G 112G 1.8M 100% /data unisoc # ./f2fs_io reserve_cblocks test.apk F2FS_IOC_RESERVE_COMPRESS_BLOCKS failed: No space left on device
adb reboot then fsck will be executed unisoc # df -h | grep dm-48 /dev/block/dm-48 112G 112G 11M 100% /data unisoc # ./f2fs_io reserve_cblocks test.apk 924(CVE-2024-35844)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
eeprom: at24: fix memory corruption race condition
If the eeprom is not accessible, an nvmem device will be registered, the read will fail, and the device will be torn down. If another driver accesses the nvmem device after the teardown, it will reference invalid memory.
Move the failure point before registering the nvmem device.(CVE-2024-35848)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipv6: Fix infinite recursion in fib6_dump_done().
syzkaller reported infinite recursive calls of fib6_dump_done() during netlink socket destruction. [1]
From the log, syzkaller sent an AF_UNSPEC RTM_GETROUTE message, and then the response was generated. The following recvmmsg() resumed the dump for IPv6, but the first call of inet6_dump_fib() failed at kzalloc() due to the fault injection. [0]
12:01:34 executing program 3: r0 = socket$nl_route(0x10, 0x3, 0x0) sendmsg$nl_route(r0, ... snip ...) recvmmsg(r0, ... snip ...) (fail_nth: 8)
Here, fib6_dump_done() was set to nlk_sk(sk)->cb.done, and the next call of inet6_dump_fib() set it to nlk_sk(sk)->cb.args[3]. syzkaller stopped receiving the response halfway through, and finally netlink_sock_destruct() called nlk_sk(sk)->cb.done().
fib6_dump_done() calls fib6_dump_end() and nlk_sk(sk)->cb.done() if it is still not NULL. fib6_dump_end() rewrites nlk_sk(sk)->cb.done() by nlk_sk(sk)->cb.args[3], but it has the same function, not NULL, calling itself recursively and hitting the stack guard page.
To avoid the issue, let's set the destructor after kzalloc().
[0]: FAULT_INJECTION: forcing a failure. name failslab, interval 1, probability 0, space 0, times 0 CPU: 1 PID: 432110 Comm: syz-executor.3 Not tainted 6.8.0-12821-g537c2e91d354-dirty #11 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:117) should_fail_ex (lib/fault-inject.c:52 lib/fault-inject.c:153) should_failslab (mm/slub.c:3733) kmalloc_trace (mm/slub.c:3748 mm/slub.c:3827 mm/slub.c:3992) inet6_dump_fib (./include/linux/slab.h:628 ./include/linux/slab.h:749 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:662) rtnl_dump_all (net/core/rtnetlink.c:4029) netlink_dump (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2269) netlink_recvmsg (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1988) _sysrecvmsg (net/socket.c:1046 net/socket.c:2801) _sys_recvmsg (net/socket.c:2846) do_recvmmsg (net/socket.c:2943) __x64_sys_recvmmsg (net/socket.c:3041 net/socket.c:3034 net/socket.c:3034)
[1]: BUG: TASK stack guard page was hit at 00000000f2fa9af1 (stack is 00000000b7912430..000000009a436beb) stack guard page: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN CPU: 1 PID: 223719 Comm: kworker/1:3 Not tainted 6.8.0-12821-g537c2e91d354-dirty #11 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Workqueue: events netlink_sock_destruct_work RIP: 0010:fib6_dump_done (net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:570) Code: 3c 24 e8 f3 e9 51 fd e9 28 fd ff ff 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa 41 57 41 56 41 55 41 54 55 48 89 fd <53> 48 8d 5d 60 e8 b6 4d 07 fd 48 89 da 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff RSP: 0018:ffffc9000d980000 EFLAGS: 00010293 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffff84405990 RCX: ffffffff844059d3 RDX: ffff8881028e0000 RSI: ffffffff84405ac2 RDI: ffff88810c02f358 RBP: ffff88810c02f358 R08: 0000000000000007 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000224 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: ffff888007c82c78 R14: ffff888007c82c68 R15: ffff888007c82c68 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88811b100000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: ffffc9000d97fff8 CR3: 0000000102309002 CR4: 0000000000770ef0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <#DF> </#DF> <TASK> fib6_dump_done (net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:572 (discriminator 1)) fib6_dump_done (net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:572 (discriminator 1)) ... fib6_dump_done (net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:572 (discriminator 1)) fib6_dump_done (net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:572 (discriminator 1)) netlink_sock_destruct (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:401) __sk_destruct (net/core/sock.c:2177 (discriminator 2)) sk_destruct (net/core/sock.c:2224) __sk_free (net/core/sock.c:2235) sk_free (net/core/sock.c:2246) process_one_work (kernel/workqueue.c:3259) worker_thread (kernel/workqueue.c:3329 kernel/workqueue. ---truncated---(CVE-2024-35886)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: nf_tables: discard table flag update with pending basechain deletion
Hook unregistration is deferred to the commit phase, same occurs with hook updates triggered by the table dormant flag. When both commands are combined, this results in deleting a basechain while leaving its hook still registered in the core.(CVE-2024-35897)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: nf_tables: Fix potential data-race in __nft_flowtable_type_get()
nft_unregister_flowtable_type() within nf_flow_inet_module_exit() can concurrent with __nft_flowtable_type_get() within nf_tables_newflowtable(). And thhere is not any protection when iterate over nf_tables_flowtables list in __nft_flowtable_type_get(). Therefore, there is pertential data-race of nf_tables_flowtables list entry.
Use list_for_each_entry_rcu() to iterate over nf_tables_flowtables list in __nft_flowtable_type_get(), and use rcu_read_lock() in the caller nft_flowtable_type_get() to protect the entire type query process.(CVE-2024-35898)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
fbmon: prevent division by zero in fb_videomode_from_videomode()
The expression htotal * vtotal can have a zero value on overflow. It is necessary to prevent division by zero like in fb_var_to_videomode().
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Svace.(CVE-2024-35922)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: lpfc: Fix possible memory leak in lpfc_rcv_padisc()
The call to lpfc_sli4_resume_rpi() in lpfc_rcv_padisc() may return an unsuccessful status. In such cases, the elsiocb is not issued, the completion is not called, and thus the elsiocb resource is leaked.
Check return value after calling lpfc_sli4_resume_rpi() and conditionally release the elsiocb resource.(CVE-2024-35930)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
btrfs: handle chunk tree lookup error in btrfs_relocate_sys_chunks()
The unhandled case in btrfs_relocate_sys_chunks() loop is a corruption, as it could be caused only by two impossible conditions:
-
at first the search key is set up to look for a chunk tree item, with offset -1, this is an inexact search and the key->offset will contain the correct offset upon a successful search, a valid chunk tree item cannot have an offset -1
-
after first successful search, the found_key corresponds to a chunk item, the offset is decremented by 1 before the next loop, it's impossible to find a chunk item there due to alignment and size constraints(CVE-2024-35936)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
pstore/zone: Add a null pointer check to the psz_kmsg_read
kasprintf() returns a pointer to dynamically allocated memory which can be NULL upon failure. Ensure the allocation was successful by checking the pointer validity.(CVE-2024-35940)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
xsk: validate user input for XDP_{UMEM|COMPLETION}_FILL_RING
syzbot reported an illegal copy in xsk_setsockopt() [1]
Make sure to validate setsockopt() @optlen parameter.
[1]
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in copy_from_sockptr_offset include/linux/sockptr.h:49 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in copy_from_sockptr include/linux/sockptr.h:55 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in xsk_setsockopt+0x909/0xa40 net/xdp/xsk.c:1420 Read of size 4 at addr ffff888028c6cde3 by task syz-executor.0/7549
CPU: 0 PID: 7549 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 6.8.0-syzkaller-08951-gfe46a7dd189e #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:114 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [inline] print_report+0x169/0x550 mm/kasan/report.c:488 kasan_report+0x143/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:601 copy_from_sockptr_offset include/linux/sockptr.h:49 [inline] copy_from_sockptr include/linux/sockptr.h:55 [inline] xsk_setsockopt+0x909/0xa40 net/xdp/xsk.c:1420 do_sock_setsockopt+0x3af/0x720 net/socket.c:2311 __sys_setsockopt+0x1ae/0x250 net/socket.c:2334 __do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2343 [inline] __se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2340 [inline] __x64_sys_setsockopt+0xb5/0xd0 net/socket.c:2340 do_syscall_64+0xfb/0x240 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75 RIP: 0033:0x7fb40587de69 Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 e1 20 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007fb40665a0c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000036 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fb4059abf80 RCX: 00007fb40587de69 RDX: 0000000000000005 RSI: 000000000000011b RDI: 0000000000000006 RBP: 00007fb4058ca47a R08: 0000000000000002 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000020001980 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 000000000000000b R14: 00007fb4059abf80 R15: 00007fff57ee4d08 </TASK>
Allocated by task 7549: kasan_save_stack mm/kasan/common.c:47 [inline] kasan_save_track+0x3f/0x80 mm/kasan/common.c:68 poison_kmalloc_redzone mm/kasan/common.c:370 [inline] __kasan_kmalloc+0x98/0xb0 mm/kasan/common.c:387 kasan_kmalloc include/linux/kasan.h:211 [inline] __do_kmalloc_node mm/slub.c:3966 [inline] __kmalloc+0x233/0x4a0 mm/slub.c:3979 kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:632 [inline] __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_setsockopt+0xd2f/0x1040 kernel/bpf/cgroup.c:1869 do_sock_setsockopt+0x6b4/0x720 net/socket.c:2293 __sys_setsockopt+0x1ae/0x250 net/socket.c:2334 __do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2343 [inline] __se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2340 [inline] __x64_sys_setsockopt+0xb5/0xd0 net/socket.c:2340 do_syscall_64+0xfb/0x240 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75
The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff888028c6cde0 which belongs to the cache kmalloc-8 of size 8 The buggy address is located 1 bytes to the right of allocated 2-byte region [ffff888028c6cde0, ffff888028c6cde2)
The buggy address belongs to the physical page: page:ffffea0000a31b00 refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0xffff888028c6c9c0 pfn:0x28c6c anon flags: 0xfff00000000800(slab|node=0|zone=1|lastcpupid=0x7ff) page_type: 0xffffffff() raw: 00fff00000000800 ffff888014c41280 0000000000000000 dead000000000001 raw: ffff888028c6c9c0 0000000080800057 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000 page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected page_owner tracks the page as allocated page last allocated via order 0, migratetype Unmovable, gfp_mask 0x112cc0(GFP_USER|__GFP_NOWARN|__GFP_NORETRY), pid 6648, tgid 6644 (syz-executor.0), ts 133906047828, free_ts 133859922223 set_page_owner include/linux/page_owner.h:31 [inline] post_alloc_hook+0x1ea/0x210 mm/page_alloc.c:1533 prep_new_page mm/page_alloc.c: ---truncated---(CVE-2024-35976)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ACPI: CPPC: Use access_width over bit_width for system memory accesses
To align with ACPI 6.3+, since bit_width can be any 8-bit value, it cannot be depended on to be always on a clean 8b boundary. This was uncovered on the Cobalt 100 platform.
SError Interrupt on CPU26, code 0xbe000011 -- SError CPU: 26 PID: 1510 Comm: systemd-udevd Not tainted 5.15.2.1-13 #1 Hardware name: MICROSOFT CORPORATION, BIOS MICROSOFT CORPORATION pstate: 62400009 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO +TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : cppc_get_perf_caps+0xec/0x410 lr : cppc_get_perf_caps+0xe8/0x410 sp : ffff8000155ab730 x29: ffff8000155ab730 x28: ffff0080139d0038 x27: ffff0080139d0078 x26: 0000000000000000 x25: ffff0080139d0058 x24: 00000000ffffffff x23: ffff0080139d0298 x22: ffff0080139d0278 x21: 0000000000000000 x20: ffff00802b251910 x19: ffff0080139d0000 x18: ffffffffffffffff x17: 0000000000000000 x16: ffffdc7e111bad04 x15: ffff00802b251008 x14: ffffffffffffffff x13: ffff013f1fd63300 x12: 0000000000000006 x11: ffffdc7e128f4420 x10: 0000000000000000 x9 : ffffdc7e111badec x8 : ffff00802b251980 x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : ffff0080139d0028 x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : ffff0080139d0018 x3 : 00000000ffffffff x2 : 0000000000000008 x1 : ffff8000155ab7a0 x0 : 0000000000000000 Kernel panic - not syncing: Asynchronous SError Interrupt CPU: 26 PID: 1510 Comm: systemd-udevd Not tainted 5.15.2.1-13 #1 Hardware name: MICROSOFT CORPORATION, BIOS MICROSOFT CORPORATION Call trace: dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1e0 show_stack+0x24/0x30 dump_stack_lvl+0x8c/0xb8 dump_stack+0x18/0x34 panic+0x16c/0x384 add_taint+0x0/0xc0 arm64_serror_panic+0x7c/0x90 arm64_is_fatal_ras_serror+0x34/0xa4 do_serror+0x50/0x6c el1h_64_error_handler+0x40/0x74 el1h_64_error+0x7c/0x80 cppc_get_perf_caps+0xec/0x410 cppc_cpufreq_cpu_init+0x74/0x400 [cppc_cpufreq] cpufreq_online+0x2dc/0xa30 cpufreq_add_dev+0xc0/0xd4 subsys_interface_register+0x134/0x14c cpufreq_register_driver+0x1b0/0x354 cppc_cpufreq_init+0x1a8/0x1000 [cppc_cpufreq] do_one_initcall+0x50/0x250 do_init_module+0x60/0x27c load_module+0x2300/0x2570 __do_sys_finit_module+0xa8/0x114 __arm64_sys_finit_module+0x2c/0x3c invoke_syscall+0x78/0x100 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x180/0x1a0 do_el0_svc+0x84/0xa0 el0_svc+0x2c/0xc0 el0t_64_sync_handler+0xa4/0x12c el0t_64_sync+0x1a4/0x1a8
Instead, use access_width to determine the size and use the offset and width to shift and mask the bits to read/write out. Make sure to add a check for system memory since pcc redefines the access_width to subspace id.
If access_width is not set, then fall back to using bit_width.
rjw: Subject and changelog edits, comment adjustments
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
HID: i2c-hid: remove I2C_HID_READ_PENDING flag to prevent lock-up
The flag I2C_HID_READ_PENDING is used to serialize I2C operations. However, this is not necessary, because I2C core already has its own locking for that.
More importantly, this flag can cause a lock-up: if the flag is set in i2c_hid_xfer() and an interrupt happens, the interrupt handler (i2c_hid_irq) will check this flag and return immediately without doing anything, then the interrupt handler will be invoked again in an infinite loop.
Since interrupt handler is an RT task, it takes over the CPU and the flag-clearing task never gets scheduled, thus we have a lock-up.
Delete this unnecessary flag.(CVE-2024-35997)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mlxsw: spectrum_acl_tcam: Fix incorrect list API usage
Both the function that migrates all the chunks within a region and the function that migrates all the entries within a chunk call list_first_entry() on the respective lists without checking that the lists are not empty. This is incorrect usage of the API, which leads to the following warning [1].
Fix by returning if the lists are empty as there is nothing to migrate in this case.
[1] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 6437 at drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_acl_tcam.c:1266 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vchunk_migrate_all+0x1f1/0> Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 6437 Comm: kworker/0:37 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc3-custom-00883-g94a65f079ef6 #39 Hardware name: Mellanox Technologies Ltd. MSN3700/VMOD0005, BIOS 5.11 01/06/2019 Workqueue: mlxsw_core mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work RIP: 0010:mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vchunk_migrate_all+0x1f1/0x2c0 [...] Call Trace: <TASK> mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work+0x6c/0x4a0 process_one_work+0x151/0x370 worker_thread+0x2cb/0x3e0 kthread+0xd0/0x100 ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 </TASK>(CVE-2024-36006)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipv4: check for NULL idev in ip_route_use_hint()
syzbot was able to trigger a NULL deref in fib_validate_source() in an old tree [1].
It appears the bug exists in latest trees.
All calls to __in_dev_get_rcu() must be checked for a NULL result.
[1] general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000000: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000000007] CPU: 2 PID: 3257 Comm: syz-executor.3 Not tainted 5.10.0-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:fib_validate_source+0xbf/0x15a0 net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c:425 Code: 18 f2 f2 f2 f2 42 c7 44 20 23 f3 f3 f3 f3 48 89 44 24 78 42 c6 44 20 27 f3 e8 5d 88 48 fc 4c 89 e8 48 c1 e8 03 48 89 44 24 18 <42> 80 3c 20 00 74 08 4c 89 ef e8 d2 15 98 fc 48 89 5c 24 10 41 bf RSP: 0018:ffffc900015fee40 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88800f7a4000 RCX: ffff88800f4f90c0 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000004001eac RDI: ffff8880160c64c0 RBP: ffffc900015ff060 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff88800f7a4000 R10: 0000000000000002 R11: ffff88800f4f90c0 R12: dffffc0000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff88800f7a4000 FS: 00007f938acfe6c0(0000) GS:ffff888058c00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f938acddd58 CR3: 000000001248e000 CR4: 0000000000352ef0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: ip_route_use_hint+0x410/0x9b0 net/ipv4/route.c:2231 ip_rcv_finish_core+0x2c4/0x1a30 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:327 ip_list_rcv_finish net/ipv4/ip_input.c:612 [inline] ip_sublist_rcv+0x3ed/0xe50 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:638 ip_list_rcv+0x422/0x470 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:673 __netif_receive_skb_list_ptype net/core/dev.c:5572 [inline] __netif_receive_skb_list_core+0x6b1/0x890 net/core/dev.c:5620 __netif_receive_skb_list net/core/dev.c:5672 [inline] netif_receive_skb_list_internal+0x9f9/0xdc0 net/core/dev.c:5764 netif_receive_skb_list+0x55/0x3e0 net/core/dev.c:5816 xdp_recv_frames net/bpf/test_run.c:257 [inline] xdp_test_run_batch net/bpf/test_run.c:335 [inline] bpf_test_run_xdp_live+0x1818/0x1d00 net/bpf/test_run.c:363 bpf_prog_test_run_xdp+0x81f/0x1170 net/bpf/test_run.c:1376 bpf_prog_test_run+0x349/0x3c0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:3736 __sys_bpf+0x45c/0x710 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5115 __do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5201 [inline] __se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5199 [inline] __x64_sys_bpf+0x7c/0x90 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5199(CVE-2024-36008)
| URL | Type | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-201.0.0.114.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-201.0.0.114.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-201.0.0.114.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-201.0.0.114.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-201.0.0.114.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-201.0.0.114.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-201.0.0.114.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-201.0.0.114.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-201.0.0.114.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-5.10.0-201.0.0.114.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-201.0.0.114.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-201.0.0.114.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-201.0.0.114.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-5.10.0-201.0.0.114.oe2203sp3.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-201.0.0.114.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-201.0.0.114.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-201.0.0.114.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-201.0.0.114.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-5.10.0-201.0.0.114.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-201.0.0.114.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-201.0.0.114.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-201.0.0.114.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-201.0.0.114.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-201.0.0.114.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-201.0.0.114.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-201.0.0.114.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-201.0.0.114.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP3",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.10.0-201.0.0.114.oe2203sp3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "High"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amdgpu: handle the case of pci_channel_io_frozen only in amdgpu_pci_resume\r\n\r\nIn current code, when a PCI error state pci_channel_io_normal is detectd,\nit will report PCI_ERS_RESULT_CAN_RECOVER status to PCI driver, and PCI\ndriver will continue the execution of PCI resume callback report_resume by\npci_walk_bridge, and the callback will go into amdgpu_pci_resume\nfinally, where write lock is releasd unconditionally without acquiring\nsuch lock first. In this case, a deadlock will happen when other threads\nstart to acquire the read lock.\r\n\r\nTo fix this, add a member in amdgpu_device strucutre to cache\npci_channel_state, and only continue the execution in amdgpu_pci_resume\nwhen it\u0026apos;s pci_channel_io_frozen.(CVE-2021-47421)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nptp: Fix possible memory leak in ptp_clock_register()\r\n\r\nI got memory leak as follows when doing fault injection test:\r\n\r\nunreferenced object 0xffff88800906c618 (size 8):\n comm \u0026quot;i2c-idt82p33931\u0026quot;, pid 4421, jiffies 4294948083 (age 13.188s)\n hex dump (first 8 bytes):\n 70 74 70 30 00 00 00 00 ptp0....\n backtrace:\n [\u0026lt;00000000312ed458\u0026gt;] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x19f/0x3a0\n [\u0026lt;0000000079f6e2ff\u0026gt;] kvasprintf+0xb5/0x150\n [\u0026lt;0000000026aae54f\u0026gt;] kvasprintf_const+0x60/0x190\n [\u0026lt;00000000f323a5f7\u0026gt;] kobject_set_name_vargs+0x56/0x150\n [\u0026lt;000000004e35abdd\u0026gt;] dev_set_name+0xc0/0x100\n [\u0026lt;00000000f20cfe25\u0026gt;] ptp_clock_register+0x9f4/0xd30 [ptp]\n [\u0026lt;000000008bb9f0de\u0026gt;] idt82p33_probe.cold+0x8b6/0x1561 [ptp_idt82p33]\r\n\r\nWhen posix_clock_register() returns an error, the name allocated\nin dev_set_name() will be leaked, the put_device() should be used\nto give up the device reference, then the name will be freed in\nkobject_cleanup() and other memory will be freed in ptp_clock_release().(CVE-2021-47455)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: enetc: deny offload of tc-based TSN features on VF interfaces\r\n\r\nTSN features on the ENETC (taprio, cbs, gate, police) are configured\nthrough a mix of command BD ring messages and port registers:\nenetc_port_rd(), enetc_port_wr().\r\n\r\nPort registers are a region of the ENETC memory map which are only\naccessible from the PCIe Physical Function. They are not accessible from\nthe Virtual Functions.\r\n\r\nMoreover, attempting to access these registers crashes the kernel:\r\n\r\n$ echo 1 \u0026gt; /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000\\:00\\:00.0/sriov_numvfs\npci 0000:00:01.0: [1957:ef00] type 00 class 0x020001\nfsl_enetc_vf 0000:00:01.0: Adding to iommu group 15\nfsl_enetc_vf 0000:00:01.0: enabling device (0000 -\u0026gt; 0002)\nfsl_enetc_vf 0000:00:01.0 eno0vf0: renamed from eth0\n$ tc qdisc replace dev eno0vf0 root taprio num_tc 8 map 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 \\\n\tqueues 1@0 1@1 1@2 1@3 1@4 1@5 1@6 1@7 base-time 0 \\\n\tsched-entry S 0x7f 900000 sched-entry S 0x80 100000 flags 0x2\nUnable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffff800009551a08\nInternal error: Oops: 96000007 [#1] PREEMPT SMP\npc : enetc_setup_tc_taprio+0x170/0x47c\nlr : enetc_setup_tc_taprio+0x16c/0x47c\nCall trace:\n enetc_setup_tc_taprio+0x170/0x47c\n enetc_setup_tc+0x38/0x2dc\n taprio_change+0x43c/0x970\n taprio_init+0x188/0x1e0\n qdisc_create+0x114/0x470\n tc_modify_qdisc+0x1fc/0x6c0\n rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x12c/0x390\r\n\r\nSplit enetc_setup_tc() into separate functions for the PF and for the\nVF drivers. Also remove enetc_qos.o from being included into\nenetc-vf.ko, since it serves absolutely no purpose there.(CVE-2022-48645)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/tegra: dsi: Add missing check for of_find_device_by_node\r\n\r\nAdd check for the return value of of_find_device_by_node() and return\nthe error if it fails in order to avoid NULL pointer dereference.(CVE-2023-52650)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nNTB: fix possible name leak in ntb_register_device()\r\n\r\nIf device_register() fails in ntb_register_device(), the device name\nallocated by dev_set_name() should be freed. As per the comment in\ndevice_register(), callers should use put_device() to give up the\nreference in the error path. So fix this by calling put_device() in the\nerror path so that the name can be freed in kobject_cleanup().\r\n\r\nAs a result of this, put_device() in the error path of\nntb_register_device() is removed and the actual error is returned.\r\n\r\n[mani: reworded commit message](CVE-2023-52652)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nSUNRPC: fix a memleak in gss_import_v2_context\r\n\r\nThe ctx-\u0026gt;mech_used.data allocated by kmemdup is not freed in neither\ngss_import_v2_context nor it only caller gss_krb5_import_sec_context,\nwhich frees ctx on error.\r\n\r\nThus, this patch reform the last call of gss_import_v2_context to the\ngss_krb5_import_ctx_v2, preventing the memleak while keepping the return\nformation.(CVE-2023-52653)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nio_uring: drop any code related to SCM_RIGHTS\r\n\r\nThis is dead code after we dropped support for passing io_uring fds\nover SCM_RIGHTS, get rid of it.(CVE-2023-52656)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: atlantic: eliminate double free in error handling logic\r\n\r\nDriver has a logic leak in ring data allocation/free,\nwhere aq_ring_free could be called multiple times on same ring,\nif system is under stress and got memory allocation error.\r\n\r\nRing pointer was used as an indicator of failure, but this is\nnot correct since only ring data is allocated/deallocated.\nRing itself is an array member.\r\n\r\nChanging ring allocation functions to return error code directly.\nThis simplifies error handling and eliminates aq_ring_free\non higher layer.(CVE-2023-52664)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nALSA: scarlett2: Add clamp() in scarlett2_mixer_ctl_put()\r\n\r\nEnsure the value passed to scarlett2_mixer_ctl_put() is between 0 and\nSCARLETT2_MIXER_MAX_VALUE so we don\u0026apos;t attempt to access outside\nscarlett2_mixer_values[].(CVE-2023-52674)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nACPI: LPIT: Avoid u32 multiplication overflow\r\n\r\nIn lpit_update_residency() there is a possibility of overflow\nin multiplication, if tsc_khz is large enough (\u0026gt; UINT_MAX/1000).\r\n\r\nChange multiplication to mul_u32_u32().\r\n\r\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2023-52683)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ncalipso: fix memory leak in netlbl_calipso_add_pass()\r\n\r\nIf IPv6 support is disabled at boot (ipv6.disable=1),\nthe calipso_init() -\u0026gt; netlbl_calipso_ops_register() function isn\u0026apos;t called,\nand the netlbl_calipso_ops_get() function always returns NULL.\nIn this case, the netlbl_calipso_add_pass() function allocates memory\nfor the doi_def variable but doesn\u0026apos;t free it with the calipso_doi_free().\r\n\r\nBUG: memory leak\nunreferenced object 0xffff888011d68180 (size 64):\n comm \u0026quot;syz-executor.1\u0026quot;, pid 10746, jiffies 4295410986 (age 17.928s)\n hex dump (first 32 bytes):\n 00 00 00 00 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................\n 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................\n backtrace:\n [\u0026lt;...\u0026gt;] kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:552 [inline]\n [\u0026lt;...\u0026gt;] netlbl_calipso_add_pass net/netlabel/netlabel_calipso.c:76 [inline]\n [\u0026lt;...\u0026gt;] netlbl_calipso_add+0x22e/0x4f0 net/netlabel/netlabel_calipso.c:111\n [\u0026lt;...\u0026gt;] genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0x22f/0x330 net/netlink/genetlink.c:739\n [\u0026lt;...\u0026gt;] genl_family_rcv_msg net/netlink/genetlink.c:783 [inline]\n [\u0026lt;...\u0026gt;] genl_rcv_msg+0x341/0x5a0 net/netlink/genetlink.c:800\n [\u0026lt;...\u0026gt;] netlink_rcv_skb+0x14d/0x440 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2515\n [\u0026lt;...\u0026gt;] genl_rcv+0x29/0x40 net/netlink/genetlink.c:811\n [\u0026lt;...\u0026gt;] netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1313 [inline]\n [\u0026lt;...\u0026gt;] netlink_unicast+0x54b/0x800 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1339\n [\u0026lt;...\u0026gt;] netlink_sendmsg+0x90a/0xdf0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1934\n [\u0026lt;...\u0026gt;] sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:651 [inline]\n [\u0026lt;...\u0026gt;] sock_sendmsg+0x157/0x190 net/socket.c:671\n [\u0026lt;...\u0026gt;] ____sys_sendmsg+0x712/0x870 net/socket.c:2342\n [\u0026lt;...\u0026gt;] ___sys_sendmsg+0xf8/0x170 net/socket.c:2396\n [\u0026lt;...\u0026gt;] __sys_sendmsg+0xea/0x1b0 net/socket.c:2429\n [\u0026lt;...\u0026gt;] do_syscall_64+0x30/0x40 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46\n [\u0026lt;...\u0026gt;] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x61/0xc6\r\n\r\nFound by InfoTeCS on behalf of Linux Verification Center\n(linuxtesting.org) with Syzkaller\r\n\r\n[PM: merged via the LSM tree at Jakub Kicinski request](CVE-2023-52698)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nfs/jfs: Add validity check for db_maxag and db_agpref\r\n\r\nBoth db_maxag and db_agpref are used as the index of the\ndb_agfree array, but there is currently no validity check for\ndb_maxag and db_agpref, which can lead to errors.\r\n\r\nThe following is related bug reported by Syzbot:\r\n\r\nUBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:639:20\nindex 7936 is out of range for type \u0026apos;atomic_t[128]\u0026apos;\r\n\r\nAdd checking that the values of db_maxag and db_agpref are valid\nindexes for the db_agfree array.(CVE-2023-52804)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\njfs: fix array-index-out-of-bounds in diAlloc\r\n\r\nCurrently there is not check against the agno of the iag while\nallocating new inodes to avoid fragmentation problem. Added the check\nwhich is required.(CVE-2023-52805)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nscsi: libfc: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference in fc_lport_ptp_setup()\r\n\r\nfc_lport_ptp_setup() did not check the return value of fc_rport_create()\nwhich can return NULL and would cause a NULL pointer dereference. Address\nthis issue by checking return value of fc_rport_create() and log error\nmessage on fc_rport_create() failed.(CVE-2023-52809)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amdgpu: Fix a null pointer access when the smc_rreg pointer is NULL\r\n\r\nIn certain types of chips, such as VEGA20, reading the amdgpu_regs_smc file could result in an abnormal null pointer access when the smc_rreg pointer is NULL. Below are the steps to reproduce this issue and the corresponding exception log:\r\n\r\n1. Navigate to the directory: /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0\n2. Execute command: cat amdgpu_regs_smc\n3. Exception Log::\n[4005007.702554] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000\n[4005007.702562] #PF: supervisor instruction fetch in kernel mode\n[4005007.702567] #PF: error_code(0x0010) - not-present page\n[4005007.702570] PGD 0 P4D 0\n[4005007.702576] Oops: 0010 [#1] SMP NOPTI\n[4005007.702581] CPU: 4 PID: 62563 Comm: cat Tainted: G OE 5.15.0-43-generic #46-Ubunt u\n[4005007.702590] RIP: 0010:0x0\n[4005007.702598] Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at RIP 0xffffffffffffffd6.\n[4005007.702600] RSP: 0018:ffffa82b46d27da0 EFLAGS: 00010206\n[4005007.702605] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffffa82b46d27e68\n[4005007.702609] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff9940656e0000\n[4005007.702612] RBP: ffffa82b46d27dd8 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff994060c07980\n[4005007.702615] R10: 0000000000020000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 00007f5e06753000\n[4005007.702618] R13: ffff9940656e0000 R14: ffffa82b46d27e68 R15: 00007f5e06753000\n[4005007.702622] FS: 00007f5e0755b740(0000) GS:ffff99479d300000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n[4005007.702626] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n[4005007.702629] CR2: ffffffffffffffd6 CR3: 00000003253fc000 CR4: 00000000003506e0\n[4005007.702633] Call Trace:\n[4005007.702636] \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n[4005007.702640] amdgpu_debugfs_regs_smc_read+0xb0/0x120 [amdgpu]\n[4005007.703002] full_proxy_read+0x5c/0x80\n[4005007.703011] vfs_read+0x9f/0x1a0\n[4005007.703019] ksys_read+0x67/0xe0\n[4005007.703023] __x64_sys_read+0x19/0x20\n[4005007.703028] do_syscall_64+0x5c/0xc0\n[4005007.703034] ? do_user_addr_fault+0x1e3/0x670\n[4005007.703040] ? exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x37/0xb0\n[4005007.703047] ? irqentry_exit_to_user_mode+0x9/0x20\n[4005007.703052] ? irqentry_exit+0x19/0x30\n[4005007.703057] ? exc_page_fault+0x89/0x160\n[4005007.703062] ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x8/0x30\n[4005007.703068] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae\n[4005007.703075] RIP: 0033:0x7f5e07672992\n[4005007.703079] Code: c0 e9 b2 fe ff ff 50 48 8d 3d fa b2 0c 00 e8 c5 1d 02 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 10 0f 05 \u0026lt;48\u0026gt; 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 56 c3 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 83 e c 28 48 89 54 24\n[4005007.703083] RSP: 002b:00007ffe03097898 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000000\n[4005007.703088] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000020000 RCX: 00007f5e07672992\n[4005007.703091] RDX: 0000000000020000 RSI: 00007f5e06753000 RDI: 0000000000000003\n[4005007.703094] RBP: 00007f5e06753000 R08: 00007f5e06752010 R09: 00007f5e06752010\n[4005007.703096] R10: 0000000000000022 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000022000\n[4005007.703099] R13: 0000000000000003 R14: 0000000000020000 R15: 0000000000020000\n[4005007.703105] \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\n[4005007.703107] Modules linked in: nf_tables libcrc32c nfnetlink algif_hash af_alg binfmt_misc nls_ iso8859_1 ipmi_ssif ast intel_rapl_msr intel_rapl_common drm_vram_helper drm_ttm_helper amd64_edac t tm edac_mce_amd kvm_amd ccp mac_hid k10temp kvm acpi_ipmi ipmi_si rapl sch_fq_codel ipmi_devintf ipm i_msghandler msr parport_pc ppdev lp parport mtd pstore_blk efi_pstore ramoops pstore_zone reed_solo mon ip_tables x_tables autofs4 ib_uverbs ib_core amdgpu(OE) amddrm_ttm_helper(OE) amdttm(OE) iommu_v 2 amd_sched(OE) amdkcl(OE) drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_sys_fops cec rc_core drm igb ahci xhci_pci libahci i2c_piix4 i2c_algo_bit xhci_pci_renesas dca\n[4005007.703184] CR2: 0000000000000000\n[4005007.703188] ---[ en\n---truncated---(CVE-2023-52817)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amd: Fix UBSAN array-index-out-of-bounds for SMU7\r\n\r\nFor pptable structs that use flexible array sizes, use flexible arrays.(CVE-2023-52818)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nperf/core: Bail out early if the request AUX area is out of bound\r\n\r\nWhen perf-record with a large AUX area, e.g 4GB, it fails with:\r\n\r\n #perf record -C 0 -m ,4G -e arm_spe_0// -- sleep 1\n failed to mmap with 12 (Cannot allocate memory)\r\n\r\nand it reveals a WARNING with __alloc_pages():\r\n\r\n\t------------[ cut here ]------------\n\tWARNING: CPU: 44 PID: 17573 at mm/page_alloc.c:5568 __alloc_pages+0x1ec/0x248\n\tCall trace:\n\t __alloc_pages+0x1ec/0x248\n\t __kmalloc_large_node+0xc0/0x1f8\n\t __kmalloc_node+0x134/0x1e8\n\t rb_alloc_aux+0xe0/0x298\n\t perf_mmap+0x440/0x660\n\t mmap_region+0x308/0x8a8\n\t do_mmap+0x3c0/0x528\n\t vm_mmap_pgoff+0xf4/0x1b8\n\t ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x18c/0x218\n\t __arm64_sys_mmap+0x38/0x58\n\t invoke_syscall+0x50/0x128\n\t el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x58/0x188\n\t do_el0_svc+0x34/0x50\n\t el0_svc+0x34/0x108\n\t el0t_64_sync_handler+0xb8/0xc0\n\t el0t_64_sync+0x1a4/0x1a8\r\n\r\n\u0026apos;rb-\u0026gt;aux_pages\u0026apos; allocated by kcalloc() is a pointer array which is used to\nmaintains AUX trace pages. The allocated page for this array is physically\ncontiguous (and virtually contiguous) with an order of 0..MAX_ORDER. If the\nsize of pointer array crosses the limitation set by MAX_ORDER, it reveals a\nWARNING.\r\n\r\nSo bail out early with -ENOMEM if the request AUX area is out of bound,\ne.g.:\r\n\r\n #perf record -C 0 -m ,4G -e arm_spe_0// -- sleep 1\n failed to mmap with 12 (Cannot allocate memory)(CVE-2023-52835)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nInput: synaptics-rmi4 - fix use after free in rmi_unregister_function()\r\n\r\nThe put_device() calls rmi_release_function() which frees \u0026quot;fn\u0026quot; so the\ndereference on the next line \u0026quot;fn-\u0026gt;num_of_irqs\u0026quot; is a use after free.\nMove the put_device() to the end to fix this.(CVE-2023-52840)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmedia: vidtv: psi: Add check for kstrdup\r\n\r\nAdd check for the return value of kstrdup() and return the error\nif it fails in order to avoid NULL pointer dereference.(CVE-2023-52844)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ntipc: Change nla_policy for bearer-related names to NLA_NUL_STRING\r\n\r\nsyzbot reported the following uninit-value access issue [1]:\r\n\r\n=====================================================\nBUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in strlen lib/string.c:418 [inline]\nBUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in strstr+0xb8/0x2f0 lib/string.c:756\n strlen lib/string.c:418 [inline]\n strstr+0xb8/0x2f0 lib/string.c:756\n tipc_nl_node_reset_link_stats+0x3ea/0xb50 net/tipc/node.c:2595\n genl_family_rcv_msg_doit net/netlink/genetlink.c:971 [inline]\n genl_family_rcv_msg net/netlink/genetlink.c:1051 [inline]\n genl_rcv_msg+0x11ec/0x1290 net/netlink/genetlink.c:1066\n netlink_rcv_skb+0x371/0x650 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2545\n genl_rcv+0x40/0x60 net/netlink/genetlink.c:1075\n netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1342 [inline]\n netlink_unicast+0xf47/0x1250 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1368\n netlink_sendmsg+0x1238/0x13d0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1910\n sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]\n sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:753 [inline]\n ____sys_sendmsg+0x9c2/0xd60 net/socket.c:2541\n ___sys_sendmsg+0x28d/0x3c0 net/socket.c:2595\n __sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2624 [inline]\n __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2633 [inline]\n __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2631 [inline]\n __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x307/0x490 net/socket.c:2631\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd\r\n\r\nUninit was created at:\n slab_post_alloc_hook+0x12f/0xb70 mm/slab.h:767\n slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3478 [inline]\n kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x577/0xa80 mm/slub.c:3523\n kmalloc_reserve+0x13d/0x4a0 net/core/skbuff.c:559\n __alloc_skb+0x318/0x740 net/core/skbuff.c:650\n alloc_skb include/linux/skbuff.h:1286 [inline]\n netlink_alloc_large_skb net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1214 [inline]\n netlink_sendmsg+0xb34/0x13d0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1885\n sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]\n sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:753 [inline]\n ____sys_sendmsg+0x9c2/0xd60 net/socket.c:2541\n ___sys_sendmsg+0x28d/0x3c0 net/socket.c:2595\n __sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2624 [inline]\n __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2633 [inline]\n __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2631 [inline]\n __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x307/0x490 net/socket.c:2631\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd\r\n\r\nTIPC bearer-related names including link names must be null-terminated\nstrings. If a link name which is not null-terminated is passed through\nnetlink, strstr() and similar functions can cause buffer overrun. This\ncauses the above issue.\r\n\r\nThis patch changes the nla_policy for bearer-related names from NLA_STRING\nto NLA_NUL_STRING. This resolves the issue by ensuring that only\nnull-terminated strings are accepted as bearer-related names.\r\n\r\nsyzbot reported similar uninit-value issue related to bearer names [2]. The\nroot cause of this issue is that a non-null-terminated bearer name was\npassed. This patch also resolved this issue.(CVE-2023-52845)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nhsr: Prevent use after free in prp_create_tagged_frame()\r\n\r\nThe prp_fill_rct() function can fail. In that situation, it frees the\nskb and returns NULL. Meanwhile on the success path, it returns the\noriginal skb. So it\u0026apos;s straight forward to fix bug by using the returned\nvalue.(CVE-2023-52846)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmedia: bttv: fix use after free error due to btv-\u0026gt;timeout timer\r\n\r\nThere may be some a race condition between timer function\nbttv_irq_timeout and bttv_remove. The timer is setup in\nprobe and there is no timer_delete operation in remove\nfunction. When it hit kfree btv, the function might still be\ninvoked, which will cause use after free bug.\r\n\r\nThis bug is found by static analysis, it may be false positive.\r\n\r\nFix it by adding del_timer_sync invoking to the remove function.\r\n\r\ncpu0 cpu1\n bttv_probe\n -\u0026gt;timer_setup\n -\u0026gt;bttv_set_dma\n -\u0026gt;mod_timer;\nbttv_remove\n -\u0026gt;kfree(btv);\n -\u0026gt;bttv_irq_timeout\n -\u0026gt;USE btv(CVE-2023-52847)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\npadata: Fix refcnt handling in padata_free_shell()\r\n\r\nIn a high-load arm64 environment, the pcrypt_aead01 test in LTP can lead\nto system UAF (Use-After-Free) issues. Due to the lengthy analysis of\nthe pcrypt_aead01 function call, I\u0026apos;ll describe the problem scenario\nusing a simplified model:\r\n\r\nSuppose there\u0026apos;s a user of padata named `user_function` that adheres to\nthe padata requirement of calling `padata_free_shell` after `serial()`\nhas been invoked, as demonstrated in the following code:\r\n\r\n```c\nstruct request {\n struct padata_priv padata;\n struct completion *done;\n};\r\n\r\nvoid parallel(struct padata_priv *padata) {\n do_something();\n}\r\n\r\nvoid serial(struct padata_priv *padata) {\n struct request *request = container_of(padata,\n \t\t\t\tstruct request,\n\t\t\t\tpadata);\n complete(request-\u0026gt;done);\n}\r\n\r\nvoid user_function() {\n DECLARE_COMPLETION(done)\n padata-\u0026gt;parallel = parallel;\n padata-\u0026gt;serial = serial;\n padata_do_parallel();\n wait_for_completion(\u0026amp;done);\n padata_free_shell();\n}\n```\r\n\r\nIn the corresponding padata.c file, there\u0026apos;s the following code:\r\n\r\n```c\nstatic void padata_serial_worker(struct work_struct *serial_work) {\n ...\n cnt = 0;\r\n\r\n while (!list_empty(\u0026amp;local_list)) {\n ...\n padata-\u0026gt;serial(padata);\n cnt++;\n }\r\n\r\n local_bh_enable();\r\n\r\n if (refcount_sub_and_test(cnt, \u0026amp;pd-\u0026gt;refcnt))\n padata_free_pd(pd);\n}\n```\r\n\r\nBecause of the high system load and the accumulation of unexecuted\nsoftirq at this moment, `local_bh_enable()` in padata takes longer\nto execute than usual. Subsequently, when accessing `pd-\u0026gt;refcnt`,\n`pd` has already been released by `padata_free_shell()`, resulting\nin a UAF issue with `pd-\u0026gt;refcnt`.\r\n\r\nThe fix is straightforward: add `refcount_dec_and_test` before calling\n`padata_free_pd` in `padata_free_shell`.(CVE-2023-52854)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nclk: mediatek: clk-mt7629: Add check for mtk_alloc_clk_data\r\n\r\nAdd the check for the return value of mtk_alloc_clk_data() in order to\navoid NULL pointer dereference.(CVE-2023-52858)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nhwmon: (axi-fan-control) Fix possible NULL pointer dereference\r\n\r\naxi_fan_control_irq_handler(), dependent on the private\naxi_fan_control_data structure, might be called before the hwmon\ndevice is registered. That will cause an \u0026quot;Unable to handle kernel\nNULL pointer dereference\u0026quot; error.(CVE-2023-52863)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/radeon: possible buffer overflow\r\n\r\nBuffer \u0026apos;afmt_status\u0026apos; of size 6 could overflow, since index \u0026apos;afmt_idx\u0026apos; is\nchecked after access.(CVE-2023-52867)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nthermal: core: prevent potential string overflow\r\n\r\nThe dev-\u0026gt;id value comes from ida_alloc() so it\u0026apos;s a number between zero\nand INT_MAX. If it\u0026apos;s too high then these sprintf()s will overflow.(CVE-2023-52868)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\npstore/platform: Add check for kstrdup\r\n\r\nAdd check for the return value of kstrdup() and return the error\nif it fails in order to avoid NULL pointer dereference.(CVE-2023-52869)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nclk: mediatek: clk-mt7629-eth: Add check for mtk_alloc_clk_data\r\n\r\nAdd the check for the return value of mtk_alloc_clk_data() in order to\navoid NULL pointer dereference.(CVE-2023-52876)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ntracing: Have trace_event_file have ref counters\r\n\r\nThe following can crash the kernel:\r\n\r\n # cd /sys/kernel/tracing\n # echo \u0026apos;p:sched schedule\u0026apos; \u0026gt; kprobe_events\n # exec 5\u0026gt;\u0026gt;events/kprobes/sched/enable\n # \u0026gt; kprobe_events\n # exec 5\u0026gt;\u0026amp;-\r\n\r\nThe above commands:\r\n\r\n 1. Change directory to the tracefs directory\n 2. Create a kprobe event (doesn\u0026apos;t matter what one)\n 3. Open bash file descriptor 5 on the enable file of the kprobe event\n 4. Delete the kprobe event (removes the files too)\n 5. Close the bash file descriptor 5\r\n\r\nThe above causes a crash!\r\n\r\n BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000028\n #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode\n #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page\n PGD 0 P4D 0\n Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI\n CPU: 6 PID: 877 Comm: bash Not tainted 6.5.0-rc4-test-00008-g2c6b6b1029d4-dirty #186\n Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014\n RIP: 0010:tracing_release_file_tr+0xc/0x50\r\n\r\nWhat happens here is that the kprobe event creates a trace_event_file\n\u0026quot;file\u0026quot; descriptor that represents the file in tracefs to the event. It\nmaintains state of the event (is it enabled for the given instance?).\nOpening the \u0026quot;enable\u0026quot; file gets a reference to the event \u0026quot;file\u0026quot; descriptor\nvia the open file descriptor. When the kprobe event is deleted, the file is\nalso deleted from the tracefs system which also frees the event \u0026quot;file\u0026quot;\ndescriptor.\r\n\r\nBut as the tracefs file is still opened by user space, it will not be\ntotally removed until the final dput() is called on it. But this is not\ntrue with the event \u0026quot;file\u0026quot; descriptor that is already freed. If the user\ndoes a write to or simply closes the file descriptor it will reference the\nevent \u0026quot;file\u0026quot; descriptor that was just freed, causing a use-after-free bug.\r\n\r\nTo solve this, add a ref count to the event \u0026quot;file\u0026quot; descriptor as well as a\nnew flag called \u0026quot;FREED\u0026quot;. The \u0026quot;file\u0026quot; will not be freed until the last\nreference is released. But the FREE flag will be set when the event is\nremoved to prevent any more modifications to that event from happening,\neven if there\u0026apos;s still a reference to the event \u0026quot;file\u0026quot; descriptor.(CVE-2023-52879)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnetfilter: nf_tables: mark set as dead when unbinding anonymous set with timeout\r\n\r\nWhile the rhashtable set gc runs asynchronously, a race allows it to\ncollect elements from anonymous sets with timeouts while it is being\nreleased from the commit path.\r\n\r\nMingi Cho originally reported this issue in a different path in 6.1.x\nwith a pipapo set with low timeouts which is not possible upstream since\n7395dfacfff6 (\u0026quot;netfilter: nf_tables: use timestamp to check for set\nelement timeout\u0026quot;).\r\n\r\nFix this by setting on the dead flag for anonymous sets to skip async gc\nin this case.\r\n\r\nAccording to 08e4c8c5919f (\u0026quot;netfilter: nf_tables: mark newset as dead on\ntransaction abort\u0026quot;), Florian plans to accelerate abort path by releasing\nobjects via workqueue, therefore, this sets on the dead flag for abort\npath too.(CVE-2024-26643)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nwireguard: netlink: access device through ctx instead of peer\r\n\r\nThe previous commit fixed a bug that led to a NULL peer-\u0026gt;device being\ndereferenced. It\u0026apos;s actually easier and faster performance-wise to\ninstead get the device from ctx-\u0026gt;wg. This semantically makes more sense\ntoo, since ctx-\u0026gt;wg-\u0026gt;peer_allowedips.seq is compared with\nctx-\u0026gt;allowedips_seq, basing them both in ctx. This also acts as a\ndefence in depth provision against freed peers.(CVE-2024-26950)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnilfs2: prevent kernel bug at submit_bh_wbc()\r\n\r\nFix a bug where nilfs_get_block() returns a successful status when\nsearching and inserting the specified block both fail inconsistently. If\nthis inconsistent behavior is not due to a previously fixed bug, then an\nunexpected race is occurring, so return a temporary error -EAGAIN instead.\r\n\r\nThis prevents callers such as __block_write_begin_int() from requesting a\nread into a buffer that is not mapped, which would cause the BUG_ON check\nfor the BH_Mapped flag in submit_bh_wbc() to fail.(CVE-2024-26955)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ns390/zcrypt: fix reference counting on zcrypt card objects\r\n\r\nTests with hot-plugging crytpo cards on KVM guests with debug\nkernel build revealed an use after free for the load field of\nthe struct zcrypt_card. The reason was an incorrect reference\nhandling of the zcrypt card object which could lead to a free\nof the zcrypt card object while it was still in use.\r\n\r\nThis is an example of the slab message:\r\n\r\n kernel: 0x00000000885a7512-0x00000000885a7513 @offset=1298. First byte 0x68 instead of 0x6b\n kernel: Allocated in zcrypt_card_alloc+0x36/0x70 [zcrypt] age=18046 cpu=3 pid=43\n kernel: kmalloc_trace+0x3f2/0x470\n kernel: zcrypt_card_alloc+0x36/0x70 [zcrypt]\n kernel: zcrypt_cex4_card_probe+0x26/0x380 [zcrypt_cex4]\n kernel: ap_device_probe+0x15c/0x290\n kernel: really_probe+0xd2/0x468\n kernel: driver_probe_device+0x40/0xf0\n kernel: __device_attach_driver+0xc0/0x140\n kernel: bus_for_each_drv+0x8c/0xd0\n kernel: __device_attach+0x114/0x198\n kernel: bus_probe_device+0xb4/0xc8\n kernel: device_add+0x4d2/0x6e0\n kernel: ap_scan_adapter+0x3d0/0x7c0\n kernel: ap_scan_bus+0x5a/0x3b0\n kernel: ap_scan_bus_wq_callback+0x40/0x60\n kernel: process_one_work+0x26e/0x620\n kernel: worker_thread+0x21c/0x440\n kernel: Freed in zcrypt_card_put+0x54/0x80 [zcrypt] age=9024 cpu=3 pid=43\n kernel: kfree+0x37e/0x418\n kernel: zcrypt_card_put+0x54/0x80 [zcrypt]\n kernel: ap_device_remove+0x4c/0xe0\n kernel: device_release_driver_internal+0x1c4/0x270\n kernel: bus_remove_device+0x100/0x188\n kernel: device_del+0x164/0x3c0\n kernel: device_unregister+0x30/0x90\n kernel: ap_scan_adapter+0xc8/0x7c0\n kernel: ap_scan_bus+0x5a/0x3b0\n kernel: ap_scan_bus_wq_callback+0x40/0x60\n kernel: process_one_work+0x26e/0x620\n kernel: worker_thread+0x21c/0x440\n kernel: kthread+0x150/0x168\n kernel: __ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x58\n kernel: ret_from_fork+0xa/0x30\n kernel: Slab 0x00000372022169c0 objects=20 used=18 fp=0x00000000885a7c88 flags=0x3ffff00000000a00(workingset|slab|node=0|zone=1|lastcpupid=0x1ffff)\n kernel: Object 0x00000000885a74b8 @offset=1208 fp=0x00000000885a7c88\n kernel: Redzone 00000000885a74b0: bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb ........\n kernel: Object 00000000885a74b8: 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk\n kernel: Object 00000000885a74c8: 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk\n kernel: Object 00000000885a74d8: 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk\n kernel: Object 00000000885a74e8: 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk\n kernel: Object 00000000885a74f8: 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk\n kernel: Object 00000000885a7508: 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 68 4b 6b 6b 6b a5 kkkkkkkkkkhKkkk.\n kernel: Redzone 00000000885a7518: bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb ........\n kernel: Padding 00000000885a756c: 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a ZZZZZZZZZZZZ\n kernel: CPU: 0 PID: 387 Comm: systemd-udevd Not tainted 6.8.0-HF #2\n kernel: Hardware name: IBM 3931 A01 704 (KVM/Linux)\n kernel: Call Trace:\n kernel: [\u0026lt;00000000ca5ab5b8\u0026gt;] dump_stack_lvl+0x90/0x120\n kernel: [\u0026lt;00000000c99d78bc\u0026gt;] check_bytes_and_report+0x114/0x140\n kernel: [\u0026lt;00000000c99d53cc\u0026gt;] check_object+0x334/0x3f8\n kernel: [\u0026lt;00000000c99d820c\u0026gt;] alloc_debug_processing+0xc4/0x1f8\n kernel: [\u0026lt;00000000c99d852e\u0026gt;] get_partial_node.part.0+0x1ee/0x3e0\n kernel: [\u0026lt;00000000c99d94ec\u0026gt;] ___slab_alloc+0xaf4/0x13c8\n kernel: [\u0026lt;00000000c99d9e38\u0026gt;] __slab_alloc.constprop.0+0x78/0xb8\n kernel: [\u0026lt;00000000c99dc8dc\u0026gt;] __kmalloc+0x434/0x590\n kernel: [\u0026lt;00000000c9b4c0ce\u0026gt;] ext4_htree_store_dirent+0x4e/0x1c0\n kernel: [\u0026lt;00000000c9b908a2\u0026gt;] htree_dirblock_to_tree+0x17a/0x3f0\n kernel: \n---truncated---(CVE-2024-26957)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnfs: fix UAF in direct writes\r\n\r\nIn production we have been hitting the following warning consistently\r\n\r\n------------[ cut here ]------------\nrefcount_t: underflow; use-after-free.\nWARNING: CPU: 17 PID: 1800359 at lib/refcount.c:28 refcount_warn_saturate+0x9c/0xe0\nWorkqueue: nfsiod nfs_direct_write_schedule_work [nfs]\nRIP: 0010:refcount_warn_saturate+0x9c/0xe0\nPKRU: 55555554\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n ? __warn+0x9f/0x130\n ? refcount_warn_saturate+0x9c/0xe0\n ? report_bug+0xcc/0x150\n ? handle_bug+0x3d/0x70\n ? exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x40\n ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20\n ? refcount_warn_saturate+0x9c/0xe0\n nfs_direct_write_schedule_work+0x237/0x250 [nfs]\n process_one_work+0x12f/0x4a0\n worker_thread+0x14e/0x3b0\n ? ZSTD_getCParams_internal+0x220/0x220\n kthread+0xdc/0x120\n ? __btf_name_valid+0xa0/0xa0\n ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30\r\n\r\nThis is because we\u0026apos;re completing the nfs_direct_request twice in a row.\r\n\r\nThe source of this is when we have our commit requests to submit, we\nprocess them and send them off, and then in the completion path for the\ncommit requests we have\r\n\r\nif (nfs_commit_end(cinfo.mds))\n\tnfs_direct_write_complete(dreq);\r\n\r\nHowever since we\u0026apos;re submitting asynchronous requests we sometimes have\none that completes before we submit the next one, so we end up calling\ncomplete on the nfs_direct_request twice.\r\n\r\nThe only other place we use nfs_generic_commit_list() is in\n__nfs_commit_inode, which wraps this call in a\r\n\r\nnfs_commit_begin();\nnfs_commit_end();\r\n\r\nWhich is a common pattern for this style of completion handling, one\nthat is also repeated in the direct code with get_dreq()/put_dreq()\ncalls around where we process events as well as in the completion paths.\r\n\r\nFix this by using the same pattern for the commit requests.\r\n\r\nBefore with my 200 node rocksdb stress running this warning would pop\nevery 10ish minutes. With my patch the stress test has been running for\nseveral hours without popping.(CVE-2024-26958)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmac802154: fix llsec key resources release in mac802154_llsec_key_del\r\n\r\nmac802154_llsec_key_del() can free resources of a key directly without\nfollowing the RCU rules for waiting before the end of a grace period. This\nmay lead to use-after-free in case llsec_lookup_key() is traversing the\nlist of keys in parallel with a key deletion:\r\n\r\nrefcount_t: addition on 0; use-after-free.\nWARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 16000 at lib/refcount.c:25 refcount_warn_saturate+0x162/0x2a0\nModules linked in:\nCPU: 4 PID: 16000 Comm: wpan-ping Not tainted 6.7.0 #19\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014\nRIP: 0010:refcount_warn_saturate+0x162/0x2a0\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n llsec_lookup_key.isra.0+0x890/0x9e0\n mac802154_llsec_encrypt+0x30c/0x9c0\n ieee802154_subif_start_xmit+0x24/0x1e0\n dev_hard_start_xmit+0x13e/0x690\n sch_direct_xmit+0x2ae/0xbc0\n __dev_queue_xmit+0x11dd/0x3c20\n dgram_sendmsg+0x90b/0xd60\n __sys_sendto+0x466/0x4c0\n __x64_sys_sendto+0xe0/0x1c0\n do_syscall_64+0x45/0xf0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76\r\n\r\nAlso, ieee802154_llsec_key_entry structures are not freed by\nmac802154_llsec_key_del():\r\n\r\nunreferenced object 0xffff8880613b6980 (size 64):\n comm \u0026quot;iwpan\u0026quot;, pid 2176, jiffies 4294761134 (age 60.475s)\n hex dump (first 32 bytes):\n 78 0d 8f 18 80 88 ff ff 22 01 00 00 00 00 ad de x.......\u0026quot;.......\n 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 03 00 cd ab 00 00 00 00 ................\n backtrace:\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff81dcfa62\u0026gt;] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x1e2/0x2d0\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff81c43865\u0026gt;] kmalloc_trace+0x25/0xc0\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff88968b09\u0026gt;] mac802154_llsec_key_add+0xac9/0xcf0\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff8896e41a\u0026gt;] ieee802154_add_llsec_key+0x5a/0x80\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff8892adc6\u0026gt;] nl802154_add_llsec_key+0x426/0x5b0\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff86ff293e\u0026gt;] genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0x1fe/0x2f0\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff86ff46d1\u0026gt;] genl_rcv_msg+0x531/0x7d0\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff86fee7a9\u0026gt;] netlink_rcv_skb+0x169/0x440\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff86ff1d88\u0026gt;] genl_rcv+0x28/0x40\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff86fec15c\u0026gt;] netlink_unicast+0x53c/0x820\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff86fecd8b\u0026gt;] netlink_sendmsg+0x93b/0xe60\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff86b91b35\u0026gt;] ____sys_sendmsg+0xac5/0xca0\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff86b9c3dd\u0026gt;] ___sys_sendmsg+0x11d/0x1c0\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff86b9c65a\u0026gt;] __sys_sendmsg+0xfa/0x1d0\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff88eadbf5\u0026gt;] do_syscall_64+0x45/0xf0\n [\u0026lt;ffffffff890000ea\u0026gt;] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76\r\n\r\nHandle the proper resource release in the RCU callback function\nmac802154_llsec_key_del_rcu().\r\n\r\nNote that if llsec_lookup_key() finds a key, it gets a refcount via\nllsec_key_get() and locally copies key id from key_entry (which is a\nlist element). So it\u0026apos;s safe to call llsec_key_put() and free the list\nentry after the RCU grace period elapses.\r\n\r\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org).(CVE-2024-26961)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nclk: qcom: mmcc-msm8974: fix terminating of frequency table arrays\r\n\r\nThe frequency table arrays are supposed to be terminated with an\nempty element. Add such entry to the end of the arrays where it\nis missing in order to avoid possible out-of-bound access when\nthe table is traversed by functions like qcom_find_freq() or\nqcom_find_freq_floor().\r\n\r\nOnly compile tested.(CVE-2024-26965)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nubifs: ubifs_symlink: Fix memleak of inode-\u0026gt;i_link in error path\r\n\r\nFor error handling path in ubifs_symlink(), inode will be marked as\nbad first, then iput() is invoked. If inode-\u0026gt;i_link is initialized by\nfscrypt_encrypt_symlink() in encryption scenario, inode-\u0026gt;i_link won\u0026apos;t\nbe freed by callchain ubifs_free_inode -\u0026gt; fscrypt_free_inode in error\nhandling path, because make_bad_inode() has changed \u0026apos;inode-\u0026gt;i_mode\u0026apos; as\n\u0026apos;S_IFREG\u0026apos;.\nFollowing kmemleak is easy to be reproduced by injecting error in\nubifs_jnl_update() when doing symlink in encryption scenario:\n unreferenced object 0xffff888103da3d98 (size 8):\n comm \u0026quot;ln\u0026quot;, pid 1692, jiffies 4294914701 (age 12.045s)\n backtrace:\n kmemdup+0x32/0x70\n __fscrypt_encrypt_symlink+0xed/0x1c0\n ubifs_symlink+0x210/0x300 [ubifs]\n vfs_symlink+0x216/0x360\n do_symlinkat+0x11a/0x190\n do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xe0\nThere are two ways fixing it:\n 1. Remove make_bad_inode() in error handling path. We can do that\n because ubifs_evict_inode() will do same processes for good\n symlink inode and bad symlink inode, for inode-\u0026gt;i_nlink checking\n is before is_bad_inode().\n 2. Free inode-\u0026gt;i_link before marking inode bad.\nMethod 2 is picked, it has less influence, personally, I think.(CVE-2024-26972)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nKVM: Always flush async #PF workqueue when vCPU is being destroyed\r\n\r\nAlways flush the per-vCPU async #PF workqueue when a vCPU is clearing its\ncompletion queue, e.g. when a VM and all its vCPUs is being destroyed.\nKVM must ensure that none of its workqueue callbacks is running when the\nlast reference to the KVM _module_ is put. Gifting a reference to the\nassociated VM prevents the workqueue callback from dereferencing freed\nvCPU/VM memory, but does not prevent the KVM module from being unloaded\nbefore the callback completes.\r\n\r\nDrop the misguided VM refcount gifting, as calling kvm_put_kvm() from\nasync_pf_execute() if kvm_put_kvm() flushes the async #PF workqueue will\nresult in deadlock. async_pf_execute() can\u0026apos;t return until kvm_put_kvm()\nfinishes, and kvm_put_kvm() can\u0026apos;t return until async_pf_execute() finishes:\r\n\r\n WARNING: CPU: 8 PID: 251 at virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:1435 kvm_put_kvm+0x2d/0x320 [kvm]\n Modules linked in: vhost_net vhost vhost_iotlb tap kvm_intel kvm irqbypass\n CPU: 8 PID: 251 Comm: kworker/8:1 Tainted: G W 6.6.0-rc1-e7af8d17224a-x86/gmem-vm #119\n Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015\n Workqueue: events async_pf_execute [kvm]\n RIP: 0010:kvm_put_kvm+0x2d/0x320 [kvm]\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n async_pf_execute+0x198/0x260 [kvm]\n process_one_work+0x145/0x2d0\n worker_thread+0x27e/0x3a0\n kthread+0xba/0xe0\n ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x50\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\n ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---\n INFO: task kworker/8:1:251 blocked for more than 120 seconds.\n Tainted: G W 6.6.0-rc1-e7af8d17224a-x86/gmem-vm #119\n \u0026quot;echo 0 \u0026gt; /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs\u0026quot; disables this message.\n task:kworker/8:1 state:D stack:0 pid:251 ppid:2 flags:0x00004000\n Workqueue: events async_pf_execute [kvm]\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n __schedule+0x33f/0xa40\n schedule+0x53/0xc0\n schedule_timeout+0x12a/0x140\n __wait_for_common+0x8d/0x1d0\n __flush_work.isra.0+0x19f/0x2c0\n kvm_clear_async_pf_completion_queue+0x129/0x190 [kvm]\n kvm_arch_destroy_vm+0x78/0x1b0 [kvm]\n kvm_put_kvm+0x1c1/0x320 [kvm]\n async_pf_execute+0x198/0x260 [kvm]\n process_one_work+0x145/0x2d0\n worker_thread+0x27e/0x3a0\n kthread+0xba/0xe0\n ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x50\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\r\n\r\nIf kvm_clear_async_pf_completion_queue() actually flushes the workqueue,\nthen there\u0026apos;s no need to gift async_pf_execute() a reference because all\ninvocations of async_pf_execute() will be forced to complete before the\nvCPU and its VM are destroyed/freed. And that in turn fixes the module\nunloading bug as __fput() won\u0026apos;t do module_put() on the last vCPU reference\nuntil the vCPU has been freed, e.g. if closing the vCPU file also puts the\nlast reference to the KVM module.\r\n\r\nNote that kvm_check_async_pf_completion() may also take the work item off\nthe completion queue and so also needs to flush the work queue, as the\nwork will not be seen by kvm_clear_async_pf_completion_queue(). Waiting\non the workqueue could theoretically delay a vCPU due to waiting for the\nwork to complete, but that\u0026apos;s a very, very small chance, and likely a very\nsmall delay. kvm_arch_async_page_present_queued() unconditionally makes a\nnew request, i.e. will effectively delay entering the guest, so the\nremaining work is really just:\r\n\r\n trace_kvm_async_pf_completed(addr, cr2_or_gpa);\r\n\r\n __kvm_vcpu_wake_up(vcpu);\r\n\r\n mmput(mm);\r\n\r\nand mmput() can\u0026apos;t drop the last reference to the page tables if the vCPU is\nstill alive, i.e. the vCPU won\u0026apos;t get stuck tearing down page tables.\r\n\r\nAdd a helper to do the flushing, specifically to deal with \u0026quot;wakeup all\u0026quot;\nwork items, as they aren\u0026apos;t actually work items, i.e. are never placed in a\nworkqueue. Trying to flush a bogus workqueue entry rightly makes\n__flush_work() complain (kudos to whoever added that sanity check).\r\n\r\nNote, commit 5f6de5cbebee (\u0026quot;KVM: Prevent module exit until al\n---truncated---(CVE-2024-26976)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nSquashfs: check the inode number is not the invalid value of zero\r\n\r\nSyskiller has produced an out of bounds access in fill_meta_index().\r\n\r\nThat out of bounds access is ultimately caused because the inode\nhas an inode number with the invalid value of zero, which was not checked.\r\n\r\nThe reason this causes the out of bounds access is due to following\nsequence of events:\r\n\r\n1. Fill_meta_index() is called to allocate (via empty_meta_index())\n and fill a metadata index. It however suffers a data read error\n and aborts, invalidating the newly returned empty metadata index.\n It does this by setting the inode number of the index to zero,\n which means unused (zero is not a valid inode number).\r\n\r\n2. When fill_meta_index() is subsequently called again on another\n read operation, locate_meta_index() returns the previous index\n because it matches the inode number of 0. Because this index\n has been returned it is expected to have been filled, and because\n it hasn\u0026apos;t been, an out of bounds access is performed.\r\n\r\nThis patch adds a sanity check which checks that the inode number\nis not zero when the inode is created and returns -EINVAL if it is.\r\n\r\n[phillip@squashfs.org.uk: whitespace fix]\n Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240409204723.446925-1-phillip@squashfs.org.uk(CVE-2024-26982)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nfs: sysfs: Fix reference leak in sysfs_break_active_protection()\r\n\r\nThe sysfs_break_active_protection() routine has an obvious reference\nleak in its error path. If the call to kernfs_find_and_get() fails then\nkn will be NULL, so the companion sysfs_unbreak_active_protection()\nroutine won\u0026apos;t get called (and would only cause an access violation by\ntrying to dereference kn-\u0026gt;parent if it was called). As a result, the\nreference to kobj acquired at the start of the function will never be\nreleased.\r\n\r\nFix the leak by adding an explicit kobject_put() call when kn is NULL.(CVE-2024-26993)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nspeakup: Avoid crash on very long word\r\n\r\nIn case a console is set up really large and contains a really long word\n(\u0026gt; 256 characters), we have to stop before the length of the word buffer.(CVE-2024-26994)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nserial/pmac_zilog: Remove flawed mitigation for rx irq flood\r\n\r\nThe mitigation was intended to stop the irq completely. That may be\nbetter than a hard lock-up but it turns out that you get a crash anyway\nif you\u0026apos;re using pmac_zilog as a serial console:\r\n\r\nttyPZ0: pmz: rx irq flood !\nBUG: spinlock recursion on CPU#0, swapper/0\r\n\r\nThat\u0026apos;s because the pr_err() call in pmz_receive_chars() results in\npmz_console_write() attempting to lock a spinlock already locked in\npmz_interrupt(). With CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK=y, this produces a fatal\nBUG splat. The spinlock in question is the one in struct uart_port.\r\n\r\nEven when it\u0026apos;s not fatal, the serial port rx function ceases to work.\nAlso, the iteration limit doesn\u0026apos;t play nicely with QEMU, as can be\nseen in the bug report linked below.\r\n\r\nA web search for other reports of the error message \u0026quot;pmz: rx irq flood\u0026quot;\ndidn\u0026apos;t produce anything. So I don\u0026apos;t think this code is needed any more.\nRemove it.(CVE-2024-26999)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nserial: mxs-auart: add spinlock around changing cts state\r\n\r\nThe uart_handle_cts_change() function in serial_core expects the caller\nto hold uport-\u0026gt;lock. For example, I have seen the below kernel splat,\nwhen the Bluetooth driver is loaded on an i.MX28 board.\r\n\r\n [ 85.119255] ------------[ cut here ]------------\n [ 85.124413] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 27 at /drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c:3453 uart_handle_cts_change+0xb4/0xec\n [ 85.134694] Modules linked in: hci_uart bluetooth ecdh_generic ecc wlcore_sdio configfs\n [ 85.143314] CPU: 0 PID: 27 Comm: kworker/u3:0 Not tainted 6.6.3-00021-gd62a2f068f92 #1\n [ 85.151396] Hardware name: Freescale MXS (Device Tree)\n [ 85.156679] Workqueue: hci0 hci_power_on [bluetooth]\n (...)\n [ 85.191765] uart_handle_cts_change from mxs_auart_irq_handle+0x380/0x3f4\n [ 85.198787] mxs_auart_irq_handle from __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x88/0x210\n (...)(CVE-2024-27000)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm: nv04: Fix out of bounds access\r\n\r\nWhen Output Resource (dcb-\u0026gt;or) value is assigned in\nfabricate_dcb_output(), there may be out of bounds access to\ndac_users array in case dcb-\u0026gt;or is zero because ffs(dcb-\u0026gt;or) is\nused as index there.\nThe \u0026apos;or\u0026apos; argument of fabricate_dcb_output() must be interpreted as a\nnumber of bit to set, not value.\r\n\r\nUtilize macros from \u0026apos;enum nouveau_or\u0026apos; in calls instead of hardcoding.\r\n\r\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2024-27008)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet/sched: Fix mirred deadlock on device recursion\r\n\r\nWhen the mirred action is used on a classful egress qdisc and a packet is\nmirrored or redirected to self we hit a qdisc lock deadlock.\nSee trace below.\r\n\r\n[..... other info removed for brevity....]\n[ 82.890906]\n[ 82.890906] ============================================\n[ 82.890906] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected\n[ 82.890906] 6.8.0-05205-g77fadd89fe2d-dirty #213 Tainted: G W\n[ 82.890906] --------------------------------------------\n[ 82.890906] ping/418 is trying to acquire lock:\n[ 82.890906] ffff888006994110 (\u0026amp;sch-\u0026gt;q.lock){+.-.}-{3:3}, at:\n__dev_queue_xmit+0x1778/0x3550\n[ 82.890906]\n[ 82.890906] but task is already holding lock:\n[ 82.890906] ffff888006994110 (\u0026amp;sch-\u0026gt;q.lock){+.-.}-{3:3}, at:\n__dev_queue_xmit+0x1778/0x3550\n[ 82.890906]\n[ 82.890906] other info that might help us debug this:\n[ 82.890906] Possible unsafe locking scenario:\n[ 82.890906]\n[ 82.890906] CPU0\n[ 82.890906] ----\n[ 82.890906] lock(\u0026amp;sch-\u0026gt;q.lock);\n[ 82.890906] lock(\u0026amp;sch-\u0026gt;q.lock);\n[ 82.890906]\n[ 82.890906] *** DEADLOCK ***\n[ 82.890906]\n[..... other info removed for brevity....]\r\n\r\nExample setup (eth0-\u0026gt;eth0) to recreate\ntc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 30\ntc filter add dev eth0 handle 1: protocol ip prio 2 matchall \\\n action mirred egress redirect dev eth0\r\n\r\nAnother example(eth0-\u0026gt;eth1-\u0026gt;eth0) to recreate\ntc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 30\ntc filter add dev eth0 handle 1: protocol ip prio 2 matchall \\\n action mirred egress redirect dev eth1\r\n\r\ntc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: htb default 30\ntc filter add dev eth1 handle 1: protocol ip prio 2 matchall \\\n action mirred egress redirect dev eth0\r\n\r\nWe fix this by adding an owner field (CPU id) to struct Qdisc set after\nroot qdisc is entered. When the softirq enters it a second time, if the\nqdisc owner is the same CPU, the packet is dropped to break the loop.(CVE-2024-27010)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnetfilter: nf_tables: fix memleak in map from abort path\r\n\r\nThe delete set command does not rely on the transaction object for\nelement removal, therefore, a combination of delete element + delete set\nfrom the abort path could result in restoring twice the refcount of the\nmapping.\r\n\r\nCheck for inactive element in the next generation for the delete element\ncommand in the abort path, skip restoring state if next generation bit\nhas been already cleared. This is similar to the activate logic using\nthe set walk iterator.\r\n\r\n[ 6170.286929] ------------[ cut here ]------------\n[ 6170.286939] WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 790302 at net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:2086 nf_tables_chain_destroy+0x1f7/0x220 [nf_tables]\n[ 6170.287071] Modules linked in: [...]\n[ 6170.287633] CPU: 6 PID: 790302 Comm: kworker/6:2 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc3+ #365\n[ 6170.287768] RIP: 0010:nf_tables_chain_destroy+0x1f7/0x220 [nf_tables]\n[ 6170.287886] Code: df 48 8d 7d 58 e8 69 2e 3b df 48 8b 7d 58 e8 80 1b 37 df 48 8d 7d 68 e8 57 2e 3b df 48 8b 7d 68 e8 6e 1b 37 df 48 89 ef eb c4 \u0026lt;0f\u0026gt; 0b 48 83 c4 08 5b 5d 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 41 5f c3 cc cc cc cc 0f\n[ 6170.287895] RSP: 0018:ffff888134b8fd08 EFLAGS: 00010202\n[ 6170.287904] RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: ffff888125bffb28 RCX: dffffc0000000000\n[ 6170.287912] RDX: 0000000000000003 RSI: ffffffffa20298ab RDI: ffff88811ebe4750\n[ 6170.287919] RBP: ffff88811ebe4700 R08: ffff88838e812650 R09: fffffbfff0623a55\n[ 6170.287926] R10: ffffffff8311d2af R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff888125bffb10\n[ 6170.287933] R13: ffff888125bffb10 R14: dead000000000122 R15: dead000000000100\n[ 6170.287940] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff888390b00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n[ 6170.287948] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n[ 6170.287955] CR2: 00007fd31fc00710 CR3: 0000000133f60004 CR4: 00000000001706f0\n[ 6170.287962] Call Trace:\n[ 6170.287967] \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n[ 6170.287973] ? __warn+0x9f/0x1a0\n[ 6170.287986] ? nf_tables_chain_destroy+0x1f7/0x220 [nf_tables]\n[ 6170.288092] ? report_bug+0x1b1/0x1e0\n[ 6170.287986] ? nf_tables_chain_destroy+0x1f7/0x220 [nf_tables]\n[ 6170.288092] ? report_bug+0x1b1/0x1e0\n[ 6170.288104] ? handle_bug+0x3c/0x70\n[ 6170.288112] ? exc_invalid_op+0x17/0x40\n[ 6170.288120] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20\n[ 6170.288132] ? nf_tables_chain_destroy+0x2b/0x220 [nf_tables]\n[ 6170.288243] ? nf_tables_chain_destroy+0x1f7/0x220 [nf_tables]\n[ 6170.288366] ? nf_tables_chain_destroy+0x2b/0x220 [nf_tables]\n[ 6170.288483] nf_tables_trans_destroy_work+0x588/0x590 [nf_tables](CVE-2024-27011)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet/rds: fix WARNING in rds_conn_connect_if_down\r\n\r\nIf connection isn\u0026apos;t established yet, get_mr() will fail, trigger connection after\nget_mr().(CVE-2024-27024)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nf2fs: compress: fix to cover normal cluster write with cp_rwsem\r\n\r\nWhen we overwrite compressed cluster w/ normal cluster, we should\nnot unlock cp_rwsem during f2fs_write_raw_pages(), otherwise data\nwill be corrupted if partial blocks were persisted before CP \u0026amp; SPOR,\ndue to cluster metadata wasn\u0026apos;t updated atomically.(CVE-2024-27034)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nf2fs: compress: fix to guarantee persisting compressed blocks by CP\r\n\r\nIf data block in compressed cluster is not persisted with metadata\nduring checkpoint, after SPOR, the data may be corrupted, let\u0026apos;s\nguarantee to write compressed page by checkpoint.(CVE-2024-27035)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nclk: zynq: Prevent null pointer dereference caused by kmalloc failure\r\n\r\nThe kmalloc() in zynq_clk_setup() will return null if the\nphysical memory has run out. As a result, if we use snprintf()\nto write data to the null address, the null pointer dereference\nbug will happen.\r\n\r\nThis patch uses a stack variable to replace the kmalloc().(CVE-2024-27037)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amd/display: Fix a potential buffer overflow in \u0026apos;dp_dsc_clock_en_read()\u0026apos;\r\n\r\nTell snprintf() to store at most 10 bytes in the output buffer\ninstead of 30.\r\n\r\nFixes the below:\ndrivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_debugfs.c:1508 dp_dsc_clock_en_read() error: snprintf() is printing too much 30 vs 10(CVE-2024-27045)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nUSB: usb-storage: Prevent divide-by-0 error in isd200_ata_command\r\n\r\nThe isd200 sub-driver in usb-storage uses the HEADS and SECTORS values\nin the ATA ID information to calculate cylinder and head values when\ncreating a CDB for READ or WRITE commands. The calculation involves\ndivision and modulus operations, which will cause a crash if either of\nthese values is 0. While this never happens with a genuine device, it\ncould happen with a flawed or subversive emulation, as reported by the\nsyzbot fuzzer.\r\n\r\nProtect against this possibility by refusing to bind to the device if\neither the ATA_ID_HEADS or ATA_ID_SECTORS value in the device\u0026apos;s ID\ninformation is 0. This requires isd200_Initialization() to return a\nnegative error code when initialization fails; currently it always\nreturns 0 (even when there is an error).(CVE-2024-27059)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmedia: usbtv: Remove useless locks in usbtv_video_free()\r\n\r\nRemove locks calls in usbtv_video_free() because\nare useless and may led to a deadlock as reported here:\nhttps://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/bisect.txt?x=166dc872180000\nAlso remove usbtv_stop() call since it will be called when\nunregistering the device.\r\n\r\nBefore \u0026apos;c838530d230b\u0026apos; this issue would only be noticed if you\ndisconnect while streaming and now it is noticeable even when\ndisconnecting while not streaming.\r\n\r\n\n[hverkuil: fix minor spelling mistake in log message](CVE-2024-27072)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmedia: ttpci: fix two memleaks in budget_av_attach\r\n\r\nWhen saa7146_register_device and saa7146_vv_init fails, budget_av_attach\nshould free the resources it allocates, like the error-handling of\nttpci_budget_init does. Besides, there are two fixme comment refers to\nsuch deallocations.(CVE-2024-27073)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmedia: dvb-frontends: avoid stack overflow warnings with clang\r\n\r\nA previous patch worked around a KASAN issue in stv0367, now a similar\nproblem showed up with clang:\r\n\r\ndrivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv0367.c:1222:12: error: stack frame size (3624) exceeds limit (2048) in \u0026apos;stv0367ter_set_frontend\u0026apos; [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than]\n 1214 | static int stv0367ter_set_frontend(struct dvb_frontend *fe)\r\n\r\nRework the stv0367_writereg() function to be simpler and mark both\nregister access functions as noinline_for_stack so the temporary\ni2c_msg structures do not get duplicated on the stack when KASAN_STACK\nis enabled.(CVE-2024-27075)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nSUNRPC: fix some memleaks in gssx_dec_option_array\r\n\r\nThe creds and oa-\u0026gt;data need to be freed in the error-handling paths after\ntheir allocation. So this patch add these deallocations in the\ncorresponding paths.(CVE-2024-27388)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\npstore: inode: Only d_invalidate() is needed\r\n\r\nUnloading a modular pstore backend with records in pstorefs would\ntrigger the dput() double-drop warning:\r\n\r\n WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2569 at fs/dcache.c:762 dput.part.0+0x3f3/0x410\r\n\r\nUsing the combo of d_drop()/dput() (as mentioned in\nDocumentation/filesystems/vfs.rst) isn\u0026apos;t the right approach here, and\nleads to the reference counting problem seen above. Use d_invalidate()\nand update the code to not bother checking for error codes that can\nnever happen.\r\n\r\n---(CVE-2024-27389)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnetfilter: nft_flow_offload: reset dst in route object after setting up flow\r\n\r\ndst is transferred to the flow object, route object does not own it\nanymore. Reset dst in route object, otherwise if flow_offload_add()\nfails, error path releases dst twice, leading to a refcount underflow.(CVE-2024-27403)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nfs/ntfs3: Fixed overflow check in mi_enum_attr()(CVE-2024-27407)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnetrom: Fix data-races around sysctl_net_busy_read\r\n\r\nWe need to protect the reader reading the sysctl value because the\nvalue can be changed concurrently.(CVE-2024-27419)\r\n\r\nRejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.(CVE-2024-27426)\r\n\r\nRejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.(CVE-2024-27427)\r\n\r\nRejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.(CVE-2024-27428)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\nx86/fpu: Keep xfd_state in sync with MSR_IA32_XFD\nCommit 672365477ae8 (\u0026quot;x86/fpu: Update XFD state where required\u0026quot;) and\ncommit 8bf26758ca96 (\u0026quot;x86/fpu: Add XFD state to fpstate\u0026quot;) introduced a\nper CPU variable xfd_state to keep the MSR_IA32_XFD value cached, in\norder to avoid unnecessary writes to the MSR.\nOn CPU hotplug MSR_IA32_XFD is reset to the init_fpstate.xfd, which\nwipes out any stale state. But the per CPU cached xfd value is not\nreset, which brings them out of sync.\nAs a consequence a subsequent xfd_update_state() might fail to update\nthe MSR which in turn can result in XRSTOR raising a #NM in kernel\nspace, which crashes the kernel.\nTo fix this, introduce xfd_set_state() to write xfd_state together\nwith MSR_IA32_XFD, and use it in all places that set MSR_IA32_XFD.(CVE-2024-35801)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndm snapshot: fix lockup in dm_exception_table_exit\r\n\r\nThere was reported lockup when we exit a snapshot with many exceptions.\nFix this by adding \u0026quot;cond_resched\u0026quot; to the loop that frees the exceptions.(CVE-2024-35805)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nsoc: fsl: qbman: Always disable interrupts when taking cgr_lock\r\n\r\nsmp_call_function_single disables IRQs when executing the callback. To\nprevent deadlocks, we must disable IRQs when taking cgr_lock elsewhere.\nThis is already done by qman_update_cgr and qman_delete_cgr; fix the\nother lockers.(CVE-2024-35806)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nfs/aio: Check IOCB_AIO_RW before the struct aio_kiocb conversion\r\n\r\nThe first kiocb_set_cancel_fn() argument may point at a struct kiocb\nthat is not embedded inside struct aio_kiocb. With the current code,\ndepending on the compiler, the req-\u0026gt;ki_ctx read happens either before\nthe IOCB_AIO_RW test or after that test. Move the req-\u0026gt;ki_ctx read such\nthat it is guaranteed that the IOCB_AIO_RW test happens first.(CVE-2024-35815)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amdgpu: amdgpu_ttm_gart_bind set gtt bound flag\r\n\r\nOtherwise after the GTT bo is released, the GTT and gart space is freed\nbut amdgpu_ttm_backend_unbind will not clear the gart page table entry\nand leave valid mapping entry pointing to the stale system page. Then\nif GPU access the gart address mistakely, it will read undefined value\ninstead page fault, harder to debug and reproduce the real issue.(CVE-2024-35817)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nLoongArch: Define the __io_aw() hook as mmiowb()\r\n\r\nCommit fb24ea52f78e0d595852e (\u0026quot;drivers: Remove explicit invocations of\nmmiowb()\u0026quot;) remove all mmiowb() in drivers, but it says:\r\n\r\n\u0026quot;NOTE: mmiowb() has only ever guaranteed ordering in conjunction with\nspin_unlock(). However, pairing each mmiowb() removal in this patch with\nthe corresponding call to spin_unlock() is not at all trivial, so there\nis a small chance that this change may regress any drivers incorrectly\nrelying on mmiowb() to order MMIO writes between CPUs using lock-free\nsynchronisation.\u0026quot;\r\n\r\nThe mmio in radeon_ring_commit() is protected by a mutex rather than a\nspinlock, but in the mutex fastpath it behaves similar to spinlock. We\ncan add mmiowb() calls in the radeon driver but the maintainer says he\ndoesn\u0026apos;t like such a workaround, and radeon is not the only example of\nmutex protected mmio.\r\n\r\nSo we should extend the mmiowb tracking system from spinlock to mutex,\nand maybe other locking primitives. This is not easy and error prone, so\nwe solve it in the architectural code, by simply defining the __io_aw()\nhook as mmiowb(). And we no longer need to override queued_spin_unlock()\nso use the generic definition.\r\n\r\nWithout this, we get such an error when run \u0026apos;glxgears\u0026apos; on weak ordering\narchitectures such as LoongArch:\r\n\r\nradeon 0000:04:00.0: ring 0 stalled for more than 10324msec\nradeon 0000:04:00.0: ring 3 stalled for more than 10240msec\nradeon 0000:04:00.0: GPU lockup (current fence id 0x000000000001f412 last fence id 0x000000000001f414 on ring 3)\nradeon 0000:04:00.0: GPU lockup (current fence id 0x000000000000f940 last fence id 0x000000000000f941 on ring 0)\nradeon 0000:04:00.0: scheduling IB failed (-35).\n[drm:radeon_gem_va_ioctl [radeon]] *ERROR* Couldn\u0026apos;t update BO_VA (-35)\nradeon 0000:04:00.0: scheduling IB failed (-35).\n[drm:radeon_gem_va_ioctl [radeon]] *ERROR* Couldn\u0026apos;t update BO_VA (-35)\nradeon 0000:04:00.0: scheduling IB failed (-35).\n[drm:radeon_gem_va_ioctl [radeon]] *ERROR* Couldn\u0026apos;t update BO_VA (-35)\nradeon 0000:04:00.0: scheduling IB failed (-35).\n[drm:radeon_gem_va_ioctl [radeon]] *ERROR* Couldn\u0026apos;t update BO_VA (-35)\nradeon 0000:04:00.0: scheduling IB failed (-35).\n[drm:radeon_gem_va_ioctl [radeon]] *ERROR* Couldn\u0026apos;t update BO_VA (-35)\nradeon 0000:04:00.0: scheduling IB failed (-35).\n[drm:radeon_gem_va_ioctl [radeon]] *ERROR* Couldn\u0026apos;t update BO_VA (-35)\nradeon 0000:04:00.0: scheduling IB failed (-35).\n[drm:radeon_gem_va_ioctl [radeon]] *ERROR* Couldn\u0026apos;t update BO_VA (-35)(CVE-2024-35818)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet/mlx5e: fix a double-free in arfs_create_groups\r\n\r\nWhen `in` allocated by kvzalloc fails, arfs_create_groups will free\nft-\u0026gt;g and return an error. However, arfs_create_table, the only caller of\narfs_create_groups, will hold this error and call to\nmlx5e_destroy_flow_table, in which the ft-\u0026gt;g will be freed again.(CVE-2024-35835)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnetfilter: bridge: replace physindev with physinif in nf_bridge_info\r\n\r\nAn skb can be added to a neigh-\u0026gt;arp_queue while waiting for an arp\nreply. Where original skb\u0026apos;s skb-\u0026gt;dev can be different to neigh\u0026apos;s\nneigh-\u0026gt;dev. For instance in case of bridging dnated skb from one veth to\nanother, the skb would be added to a neigh-\u0026gt;arp_queue of the bridge.\r\n\r\nAs skb-\u0026gt;dev can be reset back to nf_bridge-\u0026gt;physindev and used, and as\nthere is no explicit mechanism that prevents this physindev from been\nfreed under us (for instance neigh_flush_dev doesn\u0026apos;t cleanup skbs from\ndifferent device\u0026apos;s neigh queue) we can crash on e.g. this stack:\r\n\r\narp_process\n neigh_update\n skb = __skb_dequeue(\u0026amp;neigh-\u0026gt;arp_queue)\n neigh_resolve_output(..., skb)\n ...\n br_nf_dev_xmit\n br_nf_pre_routing_finish_bridge_slow\n skb-\u0026gt;dev = nf_bridge-\u0026gt;physindev\n br_handle_frame_finish\r\n\r\nLet\u0026apos;s use plain ifindex instead of net_device link. To peek into the\noriginal net_device we will use dev_get_by_index_rcu(). Thus either we\nget device and are safe to use it or we don\u0026apos;t get it and drop skb.(CVE-2024-35839)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nf2fs: compress: fix reserve_cblocks counting error when out of space\r\n\r\nWhen a file only needs one direct_node, performing the following\noperations will cause the file to be unrepairable:\r\n\r\nunisoc # ./f2fs_io compress test.apk\nunisoc #df -h | grep dm-48\n/dev/block/dm-48 112G 112G 1.2M 100% /data\r\n\r\nunisoc # ./f2fs_io release_cblocks test.apk\n924\nunisoc # df -h | grep dm-48\n/dev/block/dm-48 112G 112G 4.8M 100% /data\r\n\r\nunisoc # dd if=/dev/random of=file4 bs=1M count=3\n3145728 bytes (3.0 M) copied, 0.025 s, 120 M/s\nunisoc # df -h | grep dm-48\n/dev/block/dm-48 112G 112G 1.8M 100% /data\r\n\r\nunisoc # ./f2fs_io reserve_cblocks test.apk\nF2FS_IOC_RESERVE_COMPRESS_BLOCKS failed: No space left on device\r\n\r\nadb reboot\nunisoc # df -h | grep dm-48\n/dev/block/dm-48 112G 112G 11M 100% /data\nunisoc # ./f2fs_io reserve_cblocks test.apk\n0\r\n\r\nThis is because the file has only one direct_node. After returning\nto -ENOSPC, reserved_blocks += ret will not be executed. As a result,\nthe reserved_blocks at this time is still 0, which is not the real\nnumber of reserved blocks. Therefore, fsck cannot be set to repair\nthe file.\r\n\r\nAfter this patch, the fsck flag will be set to fix this problem.\r\n\r\nunisoc # df -h | grep dm-48\n/dev/block/dm-48 112G 112G 1.8M 100% /data\nunisoc # ./f2fs_io reserve_cblocks test.apk\nF2FS_IOC_RESERVE_COMPRESS_BLOCKS failed: No space left on device\r\n\r\nadb reboot then fsck will be executed\nunisoc # df -h | grep dm-48\n/dev/block/dm-48 112G 112G 11M 100% /data\nunisoc # ./f2fs_io reserve_cblocks test.apk\n924(CVE-2024-35844)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\neeprom: at24: fix memory corruption race condition\r\n\r\nIf the eeprom is not accessible, an nvmem device will be registered, the\nread will fail, and the device will be torn down. If another driver\naccesses the nvmem device after the teardown, it will reference\ninvalid memory.\r\n\r\nMove the failure point before registering the nvmem device.(CVE-2024-35848)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nipv6: Fix infinite recursion in fib6_dump_done().\r\n\r\nsyzkaller reported infinite recursive calls of fib6_dump_done() during\nnetlink socket destruction. [1]\r\n\r\nFrom the log, syzkaller sent an AF_UNSPEC RTM_GETROUTE message, and then\nthe response was generated. The following recvmmsg() resumed the dump\nfor IPv6, but the first call of inet6_dump_fib() failed at kzalloc() due\nto the fault injection. [0]\r\n\r\n 12:01:34 executing program 3:\n r0 = socket$nl_route(0x10, 0x3, 0x0)\n sendmsg$nl_route(r0, ... snip ...)\n recvmmsg(r0, ... snip ...) (fail_nth: 8)\r\n\r\nHere, fib6_dump_done() was set to nlk_sk(sk)-\u0026gt;cb.done, and the next call\nof inet6_dump_fib() set it to nlk_sk(sk)-\u0026gt;cb.args[3]. syzkaller stopped\nreceiving the response halfway through, and finally netlink_sock_destruct()\ncalled nlk_sk(sk)-\u0026gt;cb.done().\r\n\r\nfib6_dump_done() calls fib6_dump_end() and nlk_sk(sk)-\u0026gt;cb.done() if it\nis still not NULL. fib6_dump_end() rewrites nlk_sk(sk)-\u0026gt;cb.done() by\nnlk_sk(sk)-\u0026gt;cb.args[3], but it has the same function, not NULL, calling\nitself recursively and hitting the stack guard page.\r\n\r\nTo avoid the issue, let\u0026apos;s set the destructor after kzalloc().\r\n\r\n[0]:\nFAULT_INJECTION: forcing a failure.\nname failslab, interval 1, probability 0, space 0, times 0\nCPU: 1 PID: 432110 Comm: syz-executor.3 Not tainted 6.8.0-12821-g537c2e91d354-dirty #11\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:117)\n should_fail_ex (lib/fault-inject.c:52 lib/fault-inject.c:153)\n should_failslab (mm/slub.c:3733)\n kmalloc_trace (mm/slub.c:3748 mm/slub.c:3827 mm/slub.c:3992)\n inet6_dump_fib (./include/linux/slab.h:628 ./include/linux/slab.h:749 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:662)\n rtnl_dump_all (net/core/rtnetlink.c:4029)\n netlink_dump (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2269)\n netlink_recvmsg (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1988)\n ____sys_recvmsg (net/socket.c:1046 net/socket.c:2801)\n ___sys_recvmsg (net/socket.c:2846)\n do_recvmmsg (net/socket.c:2943)\n __x64_sys_recvmmsg (net/socket.c:3041 net/socket.c:3034 net/socket.c:3034)\r\n\r\n[1]:\nBUG: TASK stack guard page was hit at 00000000f2fa9af1 (stack is 00000000b7912430..000000009a436beb)\nstack guard page: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN\nCPU: 1 PID: 223719 Comm: kworker/1:3 Not tainted 6.8.0-12821-g537c2e91d354-dirty #11\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014\nWorkqueue: events netlink_sock_destruct_work\nRIP: 0010:fib6_dump_done (net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:570)\nCode: 3c 24 e8 f3 e9 51 fd e9 28 fd ff ff 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa 41 57 41 56 41 55 41 54 55 48 89 fd \u0026lt;53\u0026gt; 48 8d 5d 60 e8 b6 4d 07 fd 48 89 da 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff\nRSP: 0018:ffffc9000d980000 EFLAGS: 00010293\nRAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffff84405990 RCX: ffffffff844059d3\nRDX: ffff8881028e0000 RSI: ffffffff84405ac2 RDI: ffff88810c02f358\nRBP: ffff88810c02f358 R08: 0000000000000007 R09: 0000000000000000\nR10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000224 R12: 0000000000000000\nR13: ffff888007c82c78 R14: ffff888007c82c68 R15: ffff888007c82c68\nFS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88811b100000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: ffffc9000d97fff8 CR3: 0000000102309002 CR4: 0000000000770ef0\nPKRU: 55555554\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;#DF\u0026gt;\n \u0026lt;/#DF\u0026gt;\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n fib6_dump_done (net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:572 (discriminator 1))\n fib6_dump_done (net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:572 (discriminator 1))\n ...\n fib6_dump_done (net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:572 (discriminator 1))\n fib6_dump_done (net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:572 (discriminator 1))\n netlink_sock_destruct (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:401)\n __sk_destruct (net/core/sock.c:2177 (discriminator 2))\n sk_destruct (net/core/sock.c:2224)\n __sk_free (net/core/sock.c:2235)\n sk_free (net/core/sock.c:2246)\n process_one_work (kernel/workqueue.c:3259)\n worker_thread (kernel/workqueue.c:3329 kernel/workqueue.\n---truncated---(CVE-2024-35886)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnetfilter: nf_tables: discard table flag update with pending basechain deletion\r\n\r\nHook unregistration is deferred to the commit phase, same occurs with\nhook updates triggered by the table dormant flag. When both commands are\ncombined, this results in deleting a basechain while leaving its hook\nstill registered in the core.(CVE-2024-35897)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnetfilter: nf_tables: Fix potential data-race in __nft_flowtable_type_get()\r\n\r\nnft_unregister_flowtable_type() within nf_flow_inet_module_exit() can\nconcurrent with __nft_flowtable_type_get() within nf_tables_newflowtable().\nAnd thhere is not any protection when iterate over nf_tables_flowtables\nlist in __nft_flowtable_type_get(). Therefore, there is pertential\ndata-race of nf_tables_flowtables list entry.\r\n\r\nUse list_for_each_entry_rcu() to iterate over nf_tables_flowtables list\nin __nft_flowtable_type_get(), and use rcu_read_lock() in the caller\nnft_flowtable_type_get() to protect the entire type query process.(CVE-2024-35898)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nfbmon: prevent division by zero in fb_videomode_from_videomode()\r\n\r\nThe expression htotal * vtotal can have a zero value on\noverflow. It is necessary to prevent division by zero like in\nfb_var_to_videomode().\r\n\r\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Svace.(CVE-2024-35922)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nscsi: lpfc: Fix possible memory leak in lpfc_rcv_padisc()\r\n\r\nThe call to lpfc_sli4_resume_rpi() in lpfc_rcv_padisc() may return an\nunsuccessful status. In such cases, the elsiocb is not issued, the\ncompletion is not called, and thus the elsiocb resource is leaked.\r\n\r\nCheck return value after calling lpfc_sli4_resume_rpi() and conditionally\nrelease the elsiocb resource.(CVE-2024-35930)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbtrfs: handle chunk tree lookup error in btrfs_relocate_sys_chunks()\r\n\r\nThe unhandled case in btrfs_relocate_sys_chunks() loop is a corruption,\nas it could be caused only by two impossible conditions:\r\n\r\n- at first the search key is set up to look for a chunk tree item, with\n offset -1, this is an inexact search and the key-\u0026gt;offset will contain\n the correct offset upon a successful search, a valid chunk tree item\n cannot have an offset -1\r\n\r\n- after first successful search, the found_key corresponds to a chunk\n item, the offset is decremented by 1 before the next loop, it\u0026apos;s\n impossible to find a chunk item there due to alignment and size\n constraints(CVE-2024-35936)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\npstore/zone: Add a null pointer check to the psz_kmsg_read\r\n\r\nkasprintf() returns a pointer to dynamically allocated memory\nwhich can be NULL upon failure. Ensure the allocation was successful\nby checking the pointer validity.(CVE-2024-35940)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nxsk: validate user input for XDP_{UMEM|COMPLETION}_FILL_RING\r\n\r\nsyzbot reported an illegal copy in xsk_setsockopt() [1]\r\n\r\nMake sure to validate setsockopt() @optlen parameter.\r\n\r\n[1]\r\n\r\n BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in copy_from_sockptr_offset include/linux/sockptr.h:49 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in copy_from_sockptr include/linux/sockptr.h:55 [inline]\n BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in xsk_setsockopt+0x909/0xa40 net/xdp/xsk.c:1420\nRead of size 4 at addr ffff888028c6cde3 by task syz-executor.0/7549\r\n\r\nCPU: 0 PID: 7549 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 6.8.0-syzkaller-08951-gfe46a7dd189e #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]\n dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:114\n print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [inline]\n print_report+0x169/0x550 mm/kasan/report.c:488\n kasan_report+0x143/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:601\n copy_from_sockptr_offset include/linux/sockptr.h:49 [inline]\n copy_from_sockptr include/linux/sockptr.h:55 [inline]\n xsk_setsockopt+0x909/0xa40 net/xdp/xsk.c:1420\n do_sock_setsockopt+0x3af/0x720 net/socket.c:2311\n __sys_setsockopt+0x1ae/0x250 net/socket.c:2334\n __do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2343 [inline]\n __se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2340 [inline]\n __x64_sys_setsockopt+0xb5/0xd0 net/socket.c:2340\n do_syscall_64+0xfb/0x240\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75\nRIP: 0033:0x7fb40587de69\nCode: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 e1 20 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 \u0026lt;48\u0026gt; 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48\nRSP: 002b:00007fb40665a0c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000036\nRAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fb4059abf80 RCX: 00007fb40587de69\nRDX: 0000000000000005 RSI: 000000000000011b RDI: 0000000000000006\nRBP: 00007fb4058ca47a R08: 0000000000000002 R09: 0000000000000000\nR10: 0000000020001980 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000\nR13: 000000000000000b R14: 00007fb4059abf80 R15: 00007fff57ee4d08\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\r\n\r\nAllocated by task 7549:\n kasan_save_stack mm/kasan/common.c:47 [inline]\n kasan_save_track+0x3f/0x80 mm/kasan/common.c:68\n poison_kmalloc_redzone mm/kasan/common.c:370 [inline]\n __kasan_kmalloc+0x98/0xb0 mm/kasan/common.c:387\n kasan_kmalloc include/linux/kasan.h:211 [inline]\n __do_kmalloc_node mm/slub.c:3966 [inline]\n __kmalloc+0x233/0x4a0 mm/slub.c:3979\n kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:632 [inline]\n __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_setsockopt+0xd2f/0x1040 kernel/bpf/cgroup.c:1869\n do_sock_setsockopt+0x6b4/0x720 net/socket.c:2293\n __sys_setsockopt+0x1ae/0x250 net/socket.c:2334\n __do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2343 [inline]\n __se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2340 [inline]\n __x64_sys_setsockopt+0xb5/0xd0 net/socket.c:2340\n do_syscall_64+0xfb/0x240\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75\r\n\r\nThe buggy address belongs to the object at ffff888028c6cde0\n which belongs to the cache kmalloc-8 of size 8\nThe buggy address is located 1 bytes to the right of\n allocated 2-byte region [ffff888028c6cde0, ffff888028c6cde2)\r\n\r\nThe buggy address belongs to the physical page:\npage:ffffea0000a31b00 refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0xffff888028c6c9c0 pfn:0x28c6c\nanon flags: 0xfff00000000800(slab|node=0|zone=1|lastcpupid=0x7ff)\npage_type: 0xffffffff()\nraw: 00fff00000000800 ffff888014c41280 0000000000000000 dead000000000001\nraw: ffff888028c6c9c0 0000000080800057 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000\npage dumped because: kasan: bad access detected\npage_owner tracks the page as allocated\npage last allocated via order 0, migratetype Unmovable, gfp_mask 0x112cc0(GFP_USER|__GFP_NOWARN|__GFP_NORETRY), pid 6648, tgid 6644 (syz-executor.0), ts 133906047828, free_ts 133859922223\n set_page_owner include/linux/page_owner.h:31 [inline]\n post_alloc_hook+0x1ea/0x210 mm/page_alloc.c:1533\n prep_new_page mm/page_alloc.c:\n---truncated---(CVE-2024-35976)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nACPI: CPPC: Use access_width over bit_width for system memory accesses\r\n\r\nTo align with ACPI 6.3+, since bit_width can be any 8-bit value, it\ncannot be depended on to be always on a clean 8b boundary. This was\nuncovered on the Cobalt 100 platform.\r\n\r\nSError Interrupt on CPU26, code 0xbe000011 -- SError\n CPU: 26 PID: 1510 Comm: systemd-udevd Not tainted 5.15.2.1-13 #1\n Hardware name: MICROSOFT CORPORATION, BIOS MICROSOFT CORPORATION\n pstate: 62400009 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO +TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)\n pc : cppc_get_perf_caps+0xec/0x410\n lr : cppc_get_perf_caps+0xe8/0x410\n sp : ffff8000155ab730\n x29: ffff8000155ab730 x28: ffff0080139d0038 x27: ffff0080139d0078\n x26: 0000000000000000 x25: ffff0080139d0058 x24: 00000000ffffffff\n x23: ffff0080139d0298 x22: ffff0080139d0278 x21: 0000000000000000\n x20: ffff00802b251910 x19: ffff0080139d0000 x18: ffffffffffffffff\n x17: 0000000000000000 x16: ffffdc7e111bad04 x15: ffff00802b251008\n x14: ffffffffffffffff x13: ffff013f1fd63300 x12: 0000000000000006\n x11: ffffdc7e128f4420 x10: 0000000000000000 x9 : ffffdc7e111badec\n x8 : ffff00802b251980 x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : ffff0080139d0028\n x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : ffff0080139d0018 x3 : 00000000ffffffff\n x2 : 0000000000000008 x1 : ffff8000155ab7a0 x0 : 0000000000000000\n Kernel panic - not syncing: Asynchronous SError Interrupt\n CPU: 26 PID: 1510 Comm: systemd-udevd Not tainted\n5.15.2.1-13 #1\n Hardware name: MICROSOFT CORPORATION, BIOS MICROSOFT CORPORATION\n Call trace:\n dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1e0\n show_stack+0x24/0x30\n dump_stack_lvl+0x8c/0xb8\n dump_stack+0x18/0x34\n panic+0x16c/0x384\n add_taint+0x0/0xc0\n arm64_serror_panic+0x7c/0x90\n arm64_is_fatal_ras_serror+0x34/0xa4\n do_serror+0x50/0x6c\n el1h_64_error_handler+0x40/0x74\n el1h_64_error+0x7c/0x80\n cppc_get_perf_caps+0xec/0x410\n cppc_cpufreq_cpu_init+0x74/0x400 [cppc_cpufreq]\n cpufreq_online+0x2dc/0xa30\n cpufreq_add_dev+0xc0/0xd4\n subsys_interface_register+0x134/0x14c\n cpufreq_register_driver+0x1b0/0x354\n cppc_cpufreq_init+0x1a8/0x1000 [cppc_cpufreq]\n do_one_initcall+0x50/0x250\n do_init_module+0x60/0x27c\n load_module+0x2300/0x2570\n __do_sys_finit_module+0xa8/0x114\n __arm64_sys_finit_module+0x2c/0x3c\n invoke_syscall+0x78/0x100\n el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x180/0x1a0\n do_el0_svc+0x84/0xa0\n el0_svc+0x2c/0xc0\n el0t_64_sync_handler+0xa4/0x12c\n el0t_64_sync+0x1a4/0x1a8\r\n\r\nInstead, use access_width to determine the size and use the offset and\nwidth to shift and mask the bits to read/write out. Make sure to add a\ncheck for system memory since pcc redefines the access_width to\nsubspace id.\r\n\r\nIf access_width is not set, then fall back to using bit_width.\r\n\r\n[ rjw: Subject and changelog edits, comment adjustments ](CVE-2024-35995)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nHID: i2c-hid: remove I2C_HID_READ_PENDING flag to prevent lock-up\r\n\r\nThe flag I2C_HID_READ_PENDING is used to serialize I2C operations.\nHowever, this is not necessary, because I2C core already has its own\nlocking for that.\r\n\r\nMore importantly, this flag can cause a lock-up: if the flag is set in\ni2c_hid_xfer() and an interrupt happens, the interrupt handler\n(i2c_hid_irq) will check this flag and return immediately without doing\nanything, then the interrupt handler will be invoked again in an\ninfinite loop.\r\n\r\nSince interrupt handler is an RT task, it takes over the CPU and the\nflag-clearing task never gets scheduled, thus we have a lock-up.\r\n\r\nDelete this unnecessary flag.(CVE-2024-35997)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmlxsw: spectrum_acl_tcam: Fix incorrect list API usage\r\n\r\nBoth the function that migrates all the chunks within a region and the\nfunction that migrates all the entries within a chunk call\nlist_first_entry() on the respective lists without checking that the\nlists are not empty. This is incorrect usage of the API, which leads to\nthe following warning [1].\r\n\r\nFix by returning if the lists are empty as there is nothing to migrate\nin this case.\r\n\r\n[1]\nWARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 6437 at drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_acl_tcam.c:1266 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vchunk_migrate_all+0x1f1/0\u0026gt;\nModules linked in:\nCPU: 0 PID: 6437 Comm: kworker/0:37 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc3-custom-00883-g94a65f079ef6 #39\nHardware name: Mellanox Technologies Ltd. MSN3700/VMOD0005, BIOS 5.11 01/06/2019\nWorkqueue: mlxsw_core mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work\nRIP: 0010:mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vchunk_migrate_all+0x1f1/0x2c0\n[...]\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work+0x6c/0x4a0\n process_one_work+0x151/0x370\n worker_thread+0x2cb/0x3e0\n kthread+0xd0/0x100\n ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;(CVE-2024-36006)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nipv4: check for NULL idev in ip_route_use_hint()\r\n\r\nsyzbot was able to trigger a NULL deref in fib_validate_source()\nin an old tree [1].\r\n\r\nIt appears the bug exists in latest trees.\r\n\r\nAll calls to __in_dev_get_rcu() must be checked for a NULL result.\r\n\r\n[1]\ngeneral protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000000: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN\nKASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000000007]\nCPU: 2 PID: 3257 Comm: syz-executor.3 Not tainted 5.10.0-syzkaller #0\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014\n RIP: 0010:fib_validate_source+0xbf/0x15a0 net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c:425\nCode: 18 f2 f2 f2 f2 42 c7 44 20 23 f3 f3 f3 f3 48 89 44 24 78 42 c6 44 20 27 f3 e8 5d 88 48 fc 4c 89 e8 48 c1 e8 03 48 89 44 24 18 \u0026lt;42\u0026gt; 80 3c 20 00 74 08 4c 89 ef e8 d2 15 98 fc 48 89 5c 24 10 41 bf\nRSP: 0018:ffffc900015fee40 EFLAGS: 00010246\nRAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88800f7a4000 RCX: ffff88800f4f90c0\nRDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000004001eac RDI: ffff8880160c64c0\nRBP: ffffc900015ff060 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff88800f7a4000\nR10: 0000000000000002 R11: ffff88800f4f90c0 R12: dffffc0000000000\nR13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff88800f7a4000\nFS: 00007f938acfe6c0(0000) GS:ffff888058c00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: 00007f938acddd58 CR3: 000000001248e000 CR4: 0000000000352ef0\nDR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\nDR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400\nCall Trace:\n ip_route_use_hint+0x410/0x9b0 net/ipv4/route.c:2231\n ip_rcv_finish_core+0x2c4/0x1a30 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:327\n ip_list_rcv_finish net/ipv4/ip_input.c:612 [inline]\n ip_sublist_rcv+0x3ed/0xe50 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:638\n ip_list_rcv+0x422/0x470 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:673\n __netif_receive_skb_list_ptype net/core/dev.c:5572 [inline]\n __netif_receive_skb_list_core+0x6b1/0x890 net/core/dev.c:5620\n __netif_receive_skb_list net/core/dev.c:5672 [inline]\n netif_receive_skb_list_internal+0x9f9/0xdc0 net/core/dev.c:5764\n netif_receive_skb_list+0x55/0x3e0 net/core/dev.c:5816\n xdp_recv_frames net/bpf/test_run.c:257 [inline]\n xdp_test_run_batch net/bpf/test_run.c:335 [inline]\n bpf_test_run_xdp_live+0x1818/0x1d00 net/bpf/test_run.c:363\n bpf_prog_test_run_xdp+0x81f/0x1170 net/bpf/test_run.c:1376\n bpf_prog_test_run+0x349/0x3c0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:3736\n __sys_bpf+0x45c/0x710 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5115\n __do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5201 [inline]\n __se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5199 [inline]\n __x64_sys_bpf+0x7c/0x90 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5199(CVE-2024-36008)",
"id": "OESA-2024-1682",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:07:08Z",
"published": "2024-05-31T11:07:08Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/en/security/safety-bulletin/detail.html?id=openEuler-SA-2024-1682"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47421"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47455"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48645"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52650"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52652"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52653"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52656"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52664"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52674"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52683"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52698"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52804"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52805"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52809"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52817"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52818"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52835"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52840"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52844"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52845"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52846"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52847"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52854"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52858"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52863"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52867"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52868"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52869"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52876"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52879"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26643"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26950"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26955"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26957"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26958"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26961"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26965"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26972"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26976"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26982"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26993"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26994"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26999"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27000"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27008"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27010"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27011"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27024"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27034"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27035"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27037"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27045"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27059"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27072"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27073"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27075"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27388"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27389"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27403"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27407"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27419"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27426"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27427"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27428"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35801"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35805"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35806"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35815"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35817"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35818"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35835"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35839"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35844"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35848"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35886"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35897"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35898"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35922"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35930"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35936"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35940"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35976"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35995"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35997"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36006"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36008"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2021-47421",
"CVE-2021-47455",
"CVE-2022-48645",
"CVE-2023-52650",
"CVE-2023-52652",
"CVE-2023-52653",
"CVE-2023-52656",
"CVE-2023-52664",
"CVE-2023-52674",
"CVE-2023-52683",
"CVE-2023-52698",
"CVE-2023-52804",
"CVE-2023-52805",
"CVE-2023-52809",
"CVE-2023-52817",
"CVE-2023-52818",
"CVE-2023-52835",
"CVE-2023-52840",
"CVE-2023-52844",
"CVE-2023-52845",
"CVE-2023-52846",
"CVE-2023-52847",
"CVE-2023-52854",
"CVE-2023-52858",
"CVE-2023-52863",
"CVE-2023-52867",
"CVE-2023-52868",
"CVE-2023-52869",
"CVE-2023-52876",
"CVE-2023-52879",
"CVE-2024-26643",
"CVE-2024-26950",
"CVE-2024-26955",
"CVE-2024-26957",
"CVE-2024-26958",
"CVE-2024-26961",
"CVE-2024-26965",
"CVE-2024-26972",
"CVE-2024-26976",
"CVE-2024-26982",
"CVE-2024-26993",
"CVE-2024-26994",
"CVE-2024-26999",
"CVE-2024-27000",
"CVE-2024-27008",
"CVE-2024-27010",
"CVE-2024-27011",
"CVE-2024-27024",
"CVE-2024-27034",
"CVE-2024-27035",
"CVE-2024-27037",
"CVE-2024-27045",
"CVE-2024-27059",
"CVE-2024-27072",
"CVE-2024-27073",
"CVE-2024-27075",
"CVE-2024-27388",
"CVE-2024-27389",
"CVE-2024-27403",
"CVE-2024-27407",
"CVE-2024-27419",
"CVE-2024-27426",
"CVE-2024-27427",
"CVE-2024-27428",
"CVE-2024-35801",
"CVE-2024-35805",
"CVE-2024-35806",
"CVE-2024-35815",
"CVE-2024-35817",
"CVE-2024-35818",
"CVE-2024-35835",
"CVE-2024-35839",
"CVE-2024-35844",
"CVE-2024-35848",
"CVE-2024-35886",
"CVE-2024-35897",
"CVE-2024-35898",
"CVE-2024-35922",
"CVE-2024-35930",
"CVE-2024-35936",
"CVE-2024-35940",
"CVE-2024-35976",
"CVE-2024-35995",
"CVE-2024-35997",
"CVE-2024-36006",
"CVE-2024-36008"
]
}
OESA-2024-1737 (CVE-2021-47366)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2024-06-21 11:07 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:07 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
afs: Fix corruption in reads at fpos 2G-4G from an OpenAFS server
AFS-3 has two data fetch RPC variants, FS.FetchData and FS.FetchData64, and Linux's afs client switches between them when talking to a non-YFS server if the read size, the file position or the sum of the two have the upper 32 bits set of the 64-bit value.
This is a problem, however, since the file position and length fields of FS.FetchData are signed 32-bit values.
Fix this by capturing the capability bits obtained from the fileserver when it's sent an FS.GetCapabilities RPC, rather than just discarding them, and then picking out the VICED_CAPABILITY_64BITFILES flag. This can then be used to decide whether to use FS.FetchData or FS.FetchData64 - and also FS.StoreData or FS.StoreData64 - rather than using upper_32_bits() to switch on the parameter values.
This capabilities flag could also be used to limit the maximum size of the file, but all servers must be checked for that.
Note that the issue does not exist with FS.StoreData - that uses unsigned 32-bit values. It's also not a problem with Auristor servers as its YFS.FetchData64 op uses unsigned 64-bit values.
This can be tested by cloning a git repo through an OpenAFS client to an OpenAFS server and then doing "git status" on it from a Linux afs client1. Provided the clone has a pack file that's in the 2G-4G range, the git status will show errors like:
error: packfile .git/objects/pack/pack-5e813c51d12b6847bbc0fcd97c2bca66da50079c.pack does not match index
error: packfile .git/objects/pack/pack-5e813c51d12b6847bbc0fcd97c2bca66da50079c.pack does not match index
This can be observed in the server's FileLog with something like the following appearing:
Sun Aug 29 19:31:39 2021 SRXAFS_FetchData, Fid = 2303380852.491776.3263114, Host 192.168.11.201:7001, Id 1001 Sun Aug 29 19:31:39 2021 CheckRights: len=0, for host=192.168.11.201:7001 Sun Aug 29 19:31:39 2021 FetchData_RXStyle: Pos 18446744071815340032, Len 3154 Sun Aug 29 19:31:39 2021 FetchData_RXStyle: file size 2400758866 ... Sun Aug 29 19:31:40 2021 SRXAFS_FetchData returns 5
Note the file position of 18446744071815340032. This is the requested file position sign-extended.(CVE-2021-47366)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/smc: Fix possible access to freed memory in link clear
After modifying the QP to the Error state, all RX WR would be completed with WC in IB_WC_WR_FLUSH_ERR status. Current implementation does not wait for it is done, but destroy the QP and free the link group directly. So there is a risk that accessing the freed memory in tasklet context.
Here is a crash example:
BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffffff8f220860 #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page PGD f7300e067 P4D f7300e067 PUD f7300f063 PMD 8c4e45063 PTE 800ffff08c9df060 Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP PTI CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Kdump: loaded Tainted: G S OE 5.10.0-0607+ #23 Hardware name: Inspur NF5280M4/YZMB-00689-101, BIOS 4.1.20 07/09/2018 RIP: 0010:native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x176/0x1b0 Code: f3 90 48 8b 32 48 85 f6 74 f6 eb d5 c1 ee 12 83 e0 03 83 ee 01 48 c1 e0 05 48 63 f6 48 05 00 c8 02 00 48 03 04 f5 00 09 98 8e <48> 89 10 8b 42 08 85 c0 75 09 f3 90 8b 42 08 85 c0 74 f7 48 8b 32 RSP: 0018:ffffb3b6c001ebd8 EFLAGS: 00010086 RAX: ffffffff8f220860 RBX: 0000000000000246 RCX: 0000000000080000 RDX: ffff91db1f86c800 RSI: 000000000000173c RDI: ffff91db62bace00 RBP: ffff91db62bacc00 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: c00000010000028b R10: 0000000000055198 R11: ffffb3b6c001ea58 R12: ffff91db80e05010 R13: 000000000000000a R14: 0000000000000006 R15: 0000000000000040 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff91db1f840000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: ffffffff8f220860 CR3: 00000001f9580004 CR4: 00000000003706e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <IRQ> _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x30/0x40 mlx5_ib_poll_cq+0x4c/0xc50 [mlx5_ib] smc_wr_rx_tasklet_fn+0x56/0xa0 [smc] tasklet_action_common.isra.21+0x66/0x100 __do_softirq+0xd5/0x29c asm_call_irq_on_stack+0x12/0x20 </IRQ> do_softirq_own_stack+0x37/0x40 irq_exit_rcu+0x9d/0xa0 sysvec_call_function_single+0x34/0x80 asm_sysvec_call_function_single+0x12/0x20(CVE-2022-48673)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
soc: brcmstb: pm-arm: Fix refcount leak and __iomem leak bugs
In brcmstb_pm_probe(), there are two kinds of leak bugs:
(1) we need to add of_node_put() when for_each__matching_node() breaks (2) we need to add iounmap() for each iomap in fail path(CVE-2022-48693)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
rpmsg: virtio: Free driver_override when rpmsg_remove()
Free driver_override when rpmsg_remove(), otherwise the following memory leak will occur:
unreferenced object 0xffff0000d55d7080 (size 128): comm "kworker/u8:2", pid 56, jiffies 4294893188 (age 214.272s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 72 70 6d 73 67 5f 6e 73 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 rpmsg_ns........ 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [<000000009c94c9c1>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x1f8/0x320 [<000000002300d89b>] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x44/0x70 [<00000000228a60c3>] kstrndup+0x4c/0x90 [<0000000077158695>] driver_set_override+0xd0/0x164 [<000000003e9c4ea5>] rpmsg_register_device_override+0x98/0x170 [<000000001c0c89a8>] rpmsg_ns_register_device+0x24/0x30 [<000000008bbf8fa2>] rpmsg_probe+0x2e0/0x3ec [<00000000e65a68df>] virtio_dev_probe+0x1c0/0x280 [<00000000443331cc>] really_probe+0xbc/0x2dc [<00000000391064b1>] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0xe0 [<00000000a41c9a5b>] driver_probe_device+0xd8/0x160 [<000000009c3bd5df>] __device_attach_driver+0xb8/0x140 [<0000000043cd7614>] bus_for_each_drv+0x7c/0xd4 [<000000003b929a36>] __device_attach+0x9c/0x19c [<00000000a94e0ba8>] device_initial_probe+0x14/0x20 [<000000003c999637>] bus_probe_device+0xa0/0xac(CVE-2023-52670)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
pipe: wakeup wr_wait after setting max_usage
Commit c73be61cede5 ("pipe: Add general notification queue support") a regression was introduced that would lock up resized pipes under certain conditions. See the reproducer in 1.
The commit resizing the pipe ring size was moved to a different function, doing that moved the wakeup for pipe->wr_wait before actually raising pipe->max_usage. If a pipe was full before the resize occured it would result in the wakeup never actually triggering pipe_write.
Set @max_usage and @nr_accounted before waking writers if this isn't a watch queue.
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>: rewrite to account for watch queues
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ACPI: video: check for error while searching for backlight device parent
If acpi_get_parent() called in acpi_video_dev_register_backlight() fails, for example, because acpi_ut_acquire_mutex() fails inside acpi_get_parent), this can lead to incorrect (uninitialized) acpi_parent handle being passed to acpi_get_pci_dev() for detecting the parent pci device.
Check acpi_get_parent() result and set parent device only in case of success.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2023-52693)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mmc: mmc_spi: fix error handling in mmc_spi_probe()
If mmc_add_host() fails, it doesn't need to call mmc_remove_host(), or it will cause null-ptr-deref, because of deleting a not added device in mmc_remove_host().
To fix this, goto label 'fail_glue_init', if mmc_add_host() fails, and change the label 'fail_add_host' to 'fail_gpiod_request'.(CVE-2023-52708)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ceph: blocklist the kclient when receiving corrupted snap trace
When received corrupted snap trace we don't know what exactly has happened in MDS side. And we shouldn't continue IOs and metadatas access to MDS, which may corrupt or get incorrect contents.
This patch will just block all the further IO/MDS requests immediately and then evict the kclient itself.
The reason why we still need to evict the kclient just after blocking all the further IOs is that the MDS could revoke the caps faster.(CVE-2023-52732)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Fix page corruption caused by racy check in __free_pages
When we upgraded our kernel, we started seeing some page corruption like the following consistently:
BUG: Bad page state in process ganesha.nfsd pfn:1304ca page:0000000022261c55 refcount:0 mapcount:-128 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x1304ca flags: 0x17ffffc0000000() raw: 0017ffffc0000000 ffff8a513ffd4c98 ffffeee24b35ec08 0000000000000000 raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 00000000ffffff7f 0000000000000000 page dumped because: nonzero mapcount CPU: 0 PID: 15567 Comm: ganesha.nfsd Kdump: loaded Tainted: P B O 5.10.158-1.nutanix.20221209.el7.x86_64 #1 Hardware name: VMware, Inc. VMware Virtual Platform/440BX Desktop Reference Platform, BIOS 6.00 04/05/2016 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x74/0x96 bad_page.cold+0x63/0x94 check_new_page_bad+0x6d/0x80 rmqueue+0x46e/0x970 get_page_from_freelist+0xcb/0x3f0 ? _cond_resched+0x19/0x40 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x164/0x300 alloc_pages_current+0x87/0xf0 skb_page_frag_refill+0x84/0x110 ...
Sometimes, it would also show up as corruption in the free list pointer and cause crashes.
After bisecting the issue, we found the issue started from commit e320d3012d25 ("mm/page_alloc.c: fix freeing non-compound pages"):
if (put_page_testzero(page))
free_the_page(page, order);
else if (!PageHead(page))
while (order-- > 0)
free_the_page(page + (1 << order), order);
So the problem is the check PageHead is racy because at this point we already dropped our reference to the page. So even if we came in with compound page, the page can already be freed and PageHead can return false and we will end up freeing all the tail pages causing double free.(CVE-2023-52739)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
IB/hfi1: Restore allocated resources on failed copyout
Fix a resource leak if an error occurs.(CVE-2023-52747)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
virtio-blk: fix implicit overflow on virtio_max_dma_size
The following codes have an implicit conversion from size_t to u32: (u32)max_size = (size_t)virtio_max_dma_size(vdev);
This may lead overflow, Ex (size_t)4G -> (u32)0. Once virtio_max_dma_size() has a larger size than U32_MAX, use U32_MAX instead.(CVE-2023-52762)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
fs/jfs: Add check for negative db_l2nbperpage
l2nbperpage is log2(number of blks per page), and the minimum legal value should be 0, not negative.
In the case of l2nbperpage being negative, an error will occur when subsequently used as shift exponent.
Syzbot reported this bug:
UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:799:12 shift exponent -16777216 is negative(CVE-2023-52810)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/panel: fix a possible null pointer dereference
In versatile_panel_get_modes(), the return value of drm_mode_duplicate() is assigned to mode, which will lead to a NULL pointer dereference on failure of drm_mode_duplicate(). Add a check to avoid npd.(CVE-2023-52821)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
media: vidtv: mux: Add check and kfree for kstrdup
Add check for the return value of kstrdup() and return the error if it fails in order to avoid NULL pointer dereference. Moreover, use kfree() in the later error handling in order to avoid memory leak.(CVE-2023-52841)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
hsr: Prevent use after free in prp_create_tagged_frame()
The prp_fill_rct() function can fail. In that situation, it frees the skb and returns NULL. Meanwhile on the success path, it returns the original skb. So it's straight forward to fix bug by using the returned value.(CVE-2023-52846)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
clk: sunxi-ng: h6: Reparent CPUX during PLL CPUX rate change
While PLL CPUX clock rate change when CPU is running from it works in vast majority of cases, now and then it causes instability. This leads to system crashes and other undefined behaviour. After a lot of testing (30+ hours) while also doing a lot of frequency switches, we can't observe any instability issues anymore when doing reparenting to stable clock like 24 MHz oscillator.(CVE-2023-52882)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ksmbd: validate request buffer size in smb2_allocate_rsp_buf()
The response buffer should be allocated in smb2_allocate_rsp_buf before validating request. But the fields in payload as well as smb2 header is used in smb2_allocate_rsp_buf(). This patch add simple buffer size validation to avoid potencial out-of-bounds in request buffer.(CVE-2024-26936)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ARM: 9359/1: flush: check if the folio is reserved for no-mapping addresses
Since commit a4d5613c4dc6 ("arm: extend pfn_valid to take into account freed memory map alignment") changes the semantics of pfn_valid() to check presence of the memory map for a PFN. A valid page for an address which is reserved but not mapped by the kernel1, the system crashed during some uio test with the following memory layout:
node 0: [mem 0x00000000c0a00000-0x00000000cc8fffff] node 0: [mem 0x00000000d0000000-0x00000000da1fffff] the uio layout is:0xc0900000, 0x100000
the crash backtrace like:
Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address bff00000 [...] CPU: 1 PID: 465 Comm: startapp.bin Tainted: G O 5.10.0 #1 Hardware name: Generic DT based system PC is at b15_flush_kern_dcache_area+0x24/0x3c LR is at __sync_icache_dcache+0x6c/0x98 [...] (b15_flush_kern_dcache_area) from (__sync_icache_dcache+0x6c/0x98) (__sync_icache_dcache) from (set_pte_at+0x28/0x54) (set_pte_at) from (remap_pfn_range+0x1a0/0x274) (remap_pfn_range) from (uio_mmap+0x184/0x1b8 [uio]) (uio_mmap [uio]) from (__mmap_region+0x264/0x5f4) (__mmap_region) from (__do_mmap_mm+0x3ec/0x440) (__do_mmap_mm) from (do_mmap+0x50/0x58) (do_mmap) from (vm_mmap_pgoff+0xfc/0x188) (vm_mmap_pgoff) from (ksys_mmap_pgoff+0xac/0xc4) (ksys_mmap_pgoff) from (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x5c) Code: e0801001 e2423001 e1c00003 f57ff04f (ee070f3e) ---[ end trace 09cf0734c3805d52 ]--- Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception
So check if PG_reserved was set to solve this issue.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ksmbd: fix slab-out-of-bounds in smb_strndup_from_utf16()
If ->NameOffset of smb2_create_req is smaller than Buffer offset of smb2_create_req, slab-out-of-bounds read can happen from smb2_open. This patch set the minimum value of the name offset to the buffer offset to validate name length of smb2_create_req().(CVE-2024-26954)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mm: swap: fix race between free_swap_and_cache() and swapoff()
There was previously a theoretical window where swapoff() could run and teardown a swap_info_struct while a call to free_swap_and_cache() was running in another thread. This could cause, amongst other bad possibilities, swap_page_trans_huge_swapped() (called by free_swap_and_cache()) to access the freed memory for swap_map.
This is a theoretical problem and I haven't been able to provoke it from a test case. But there has been agreement based on code review that this is possible (see link below).
Fix it by using get_swap_device()/put_swap_device(), which will stall swapoff(). There was an extra check in _swap_info_get() to confirm that the swap entry was not free. This isn't present in get_swap_device() because it doesn't make sense in general due to the race between getting the reference and swapoff. So I've added an equivalent check directly in free_swap_and_cache().
Details of how to provoke one possible issue (thanks to David Hildenbrand for deriving this):
--8<-----
__swap_entry_free() might be the last user and result in "count == SWAP_HAS_CACHE".
swapoff->try_to_unuse() will stop as soon as soon as si->inuse_pages==0.
So the question is: could someone reclaim the folio and turn si->inuse_pages==0, before we completed swap_page_trans_huge_swapped().
Imagine the following: 2 MiB folio in the swapcache. Only 2 subpages are still references by swap entries.
Process 1 still references subpage 0 via swap entry. Process 2 still references subpage 1 via swap entry.
Process 1 quits. Calls free_swap_and_cache(). -> count == SWAP_HAS_CACHE [then, preempted in the hypervisor etc.]
Process 2 quits. Calls free_swap_and_cache(). -> count == SWAP_HAS_CACHE
Process 2 goes ahead, passes swap_page_trans_huge_swapped(), and calls __try_to_reclaim_swap().
__try_to_reclaim_swap()->folio_free_swap()->delete_from_swap_cache()-> put_swap_folio()->free_swap_slot()->swapcache_free_entries()-> swap_entry_free()->swap_range_free()-> ... WRITE_ONCE(si->inuse_pages, si->inuse_pages - nr_entries);
What stops swapoff to succeed after process 2 reclaimed the swap cache but before process1 finished its call to swap_page_trans_huge_swapped()?
--8<-----(CVE-2024-26960)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/mlx5e: Prevent deadlock while disabling aRFS
When disabling aRFS under the priv->state_lock, any scheduled
aRFS works are canceled using the cancel_work_sync function,
which waits for the work to end if it has already started.
However, while waiting for the work handler, the handler will
try to acquire the state_lock which is already acquired.
The worker acquires the lock to delete the rules if the state is down, which is not the worker's responsibility since disabling aRFS deletes the rules.
Add an aRFS state variable, which indicates whether the aRFS is enabled and prevent adding rules when the aRFS is disabled.
Kernel log:
====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.7.0-rc4_net_next_mlx5_5483eb2 #1 Tainted: G I
ethtool/386089 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88810f21ce68 ((work_completion)(&rule->arfs_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x74/0x4e0
but task is already holding lock: ffff8884a1808cc0 (&priv->state_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mlx5e_ethtool_set_channels+0x53/0x200 [mlx5_core]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (&priv->state_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x80/0xc90 arfs_handle_work+0x4b/0x3b0 [mlx5_core] process_one_work+0x1dc/0x4a0 worker_thread+0x1bf/0x3c0 kthread+0xd7/0x100 ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x50 ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20
-> #0 ((work_completion)(&rule->arfs_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x17b4/0x2c80 lock_acquire+0xd0/0x2b0 __flush_work+0x7a/0x4e0 __cancel_work_timer+0x131/0x1c0 arfs_del_rules+0x143/0x1e0 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_arfs_disable+0x1b/0x30 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_ethtool_set_channels+0xcb/0x200 [mlx5_core] ethnl_set_channels+0x28f/0x3b0 ethnl_default_set_doit+0xec/0x240 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0xd0/0x120 genl_rcv_msg+0x188/0x2c0 netlink_rcv_skb+0x54/0x100 genl_rcv+0x24/0x40 netlink_unicast+0x1a1/0x270 netlink_sendmsg+0x214/0x460 __sock_sendmsg+0x38/0x60 __sys_sendto+0x113/0x170 __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30 do_syscall_64+0x40/0xe0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0x4e
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&priv->state_lock); lock((work_completion)(&rule->arfs_work)); lock(&priv->state_lock); lock((work_completion)(&rule->arfs_work));
*** DEADLOCK ***
3 locks held by ethtool/386089: #0: ffffffff82ea7210 (cb_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: genl_rcv+0x15/0x40 #1: ffffffff82e94c88 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ethnl_default_set_doit+0xd3/0x240 #2: ffff8884a1808cc0 (&priv->state_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mlx5e_ethtool_set_channels+0x53/0x200 [mlx5_core]
stack backtrace: CPU: 15 PID: 386089 Comm: ethtool Tainted: G I 6.7.0-rc4_net_next_mlx5_5483eb2 #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0xa0 check_noncircular+0x144/0x160 __lock_acquire+0x17b4/0x2c80 lock_acquire+0xd0/0x2b0 ? __flush_work+0x74/0x4e0 ? save_trace+0x3e/0x360 ? __flush_work+0x74/0x4e0 __flush_work+0x7a/0x4e0 ? __flush_work+0x74/0x4e0 ? __lock_acquire+0xa78/0x2c80 ? lock_acquire+0xd0/0x2b0 ? mark_held_locks+0x49/0x70 __cancel_work_timer+0x131/0x1c0 ? mark_held_locks+0x49/0x70 arfs_del_rules+0x143/0x1e0 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_arfs_disable+0x1b/0x30 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_ethtool_set_channels+0xcb/0x200 [mlx5_core] ethnl_set_channels+0x28f/0x3b0 ethnl_default_set_doit+0xec/0x240 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0xd0/0x120 genl_rcv_msg+0x188/0x2c0 ? ethn ---truncated---(CVE-2024-27014)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: nf_tables: Fix potential data-race in __nft_obj_type_get()
nft_unregister_obj() can concurrent with __nft_obj_type_get(), and there is not any protection when iterate over nf_tables_objects list in __nft_obj_type_get(). Therefore, there is potential data-race of nf_tables_objects list entry.
Use list_for_each_entry_rcu() to iterate over nf_tables_objects list in __nft_obj_type_get(), and use rcu_read_lock() in the caller nft_obj_type_get() to protect the entire type query process.(CVE-2024-27019)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: Fix potential NULL pointer dereferences in 'dcn10_set_output_transfer_func()'
The 'stream' pointer is used in dcn10_set_output_transfer_func() before the check if 'stream' is NULL.
Fixes the below: drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/hwss/dcn10/dcn10_hwseq.c:1892 dcn10_set_output_transfer_func() warn: variable dereferenced before check 'stream' (see line 1875)(CVE-2024-27044)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: ll_temac: platform_get_resource replaced by wrong function
The function platform_get_resource was replaced with devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname and is called using 0 as name.
This eventually ends up in platform_get_resource_byname in the call stack, where it causes a null pointer in strcmp.
if (type == resource_type(r) && !strcmp(r->name, name))
It should have been replaced with devm_platform_ioremap_resource.(CVE-2024-35796)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
fs/aio: Check IOCB_AIO_RW before the struct aio_kiocb conversion
The first kiocb_set_cancel_fn() argument may point at a struct kiocb that is not embedded inside struct aio_kiocb. With the current code, depending on the compiler, the req->ki_ctx read happens either before the IOCB_AIO_RW test or after that test. Move the req->ki_ctx read such that it is guaranteed that the IOCB_AIO_RW test happens first.(CVE-2024-35815)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
soc: fsl: qbman: Use raw spinlock for cgr_lock
smp_call_function always runs its callback in hard IRQ context, even on PREEMPT_RT, where spinlocks can sleep. So we need to use a raw spinlock for cgr_lock to ensure we aren't waiting on a sleeping task.
Although this bug has existed for a while, it was not apparent until commit ef2a8d5478b9 ("net: dpaa: Adjust queue depth on rate change") which invokes smp_call_function_single via qman_update_cgr_safe every time a link goes up or down.(CVE-2024-35819)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: libertas: fix some memleaks in lbs_allocate_cmd_buffer()
In the for statement of lbs_allocate_cmd_buffer(), if the allocation of cmdarray[i].cmdbuf fails, both cmdarray and cmdarray[i].cmdbuf needs to be freed. Otherwise, there will be memleaks in lbs_allocate_cmd_buffer().(CVE-2024-35828)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: bridge: replace physindev with physinif in nf_bridge_info
An skb can be added to a neigh->arp_queue while waiting for an arp reply. Where original skb's skb->dev can be different to neigh's neigh->dev. For instance in case of bridging dnated skb from one veth to another, the skb would be added to a neigh->arp_queue of the bridge.
As skb->dev can be reset back to nf_bridge->physindev and used, and as there is no explicit mechanism that prevents this physindev from been freed under us (for instance neigh_flush_dev doesn't cleanup skbs from different device's neigh queue) we can crash on e.g. this stack:
arp_process neigh_update skb = __skb_dequeue(&neigh->arp_queue) neigh_resolve_output(..., skb) ... br_nf_dev_xmit br_nf_pre_routing_finish_bridge_slow skb->dev = nf_bridge->physindev br_handle_frame_finish
Let's use plain ifindex instead of net_device link. To peek into the original net_device we will use dev_get_by_index_rcu(). Thus either we get device and are safe to use it or we don't get it and drop skb.(CVE-2024-35839)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
smb: client: fix UAF in smb2_reconnect_server()
The UAF bug is due to smb2_reconnect_server() accessing a session that is already being teared down by another thread that is executing __cifs_put_smb_ses(). This can happen when (a) the client has connection to the server but no session or (b) another thread ends up setting @ses->ses_status again to something different than SES_EXITING.
To fix this, we need to make sure to unconditionally set @ses->ses_status to SES_EXITING and prevent any other threads from setting a new status while we're still tearing it down.
The following can be reproduced by adding some delay to right after the ipc is freed in __cifs_put_smb_ses() - which will give smb2_reconnect_server() worker a chance to run and then accessing @ses->ipc:
kinit ... mount.cifs //srv/share /mnt/1 -o sec=krb5,nohandlecache,echo_interval=10 [disconnect srv] ls /mnt/1 &>/dev/null sleep 30 kdestroy [reconnect srv] sleep 10 umount /mnt/1 ... CIFS: VFS: Verify user has a krb5 ticket and keyutils is installed CIFS: VFS: \srv Send error in SessSetup = -126 CIFS: VFS: Verify user has a krb5 ticket and keyutils is installed CIFS: VFS: \srv Send error in SessSetup = -126 general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 3 PID: 50 Comm: kworker/3:1 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc2 #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-1.fc39 04/01/2014 Workqueue: cifsiod smb2_reconnect_server [cifs] RIP: 0010:__list_del_entry_valid_or_report+0x33/0xf0 Code: 4f 08 48 85 d2 74 42 48 85 c9 74 59 48 b8 00 01 00 00 00 00 ad de 48 39 c2 74 61 48 b8 22 01 00 00 00 00 74 69 <48> 8b 01 48 39 f8 75 7b 48 8b 72 08 48 39 c6 0f 85 88 00 00 00 b8 RSP: 0018:ffffc900001bfd70 EFLAGS: 00010a83 RAX: dead000000000122 RBX: ffff88810da53838 RCX: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b RDX: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b RSI: ffffffffc02f6878 RDI: ffff88810da53800 RBP: ffff88810da53800 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff88810c064000 R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffff88810c064000 R15: ffff8881039cc000 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff888157c00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007fe3728b1000 CR3: 000000010caa4000 CR4: 0000000000750ef0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> ? die_addr+0x36/0x90 ? exc_general_protection+0x1c1/0x3f0 ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30 ? __list_del_entry_valid_or_report+0x33/0xf0 __cifs_put_smb_ses+0x1ae/0x500 [cifs] smb2_reconnect_server+0x4ed/0x710 [cifs] process_one_work+0x205/0x6b0 worker_thread+0x191/0x360 ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 kthread+0xe2/0x110 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 </TASK>(CVE-2024-35870)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ax25: fix use-after-free bugs caused by ax25_ds_del_timer
When the ax25 device is detaching, the ax25_dev_device_down() calls ax25_ds_del_timer() to cleanup the slave_timer. When the timer handler is running, the ax25_ds_del_timer() that calls del_timer() in it will return directly. As a result, the use-after-free bugs could happen, one of the scenarios is shown below:
(Thread 1) | (Thread 2)
| ax25_ds_timeout()
ax25_dev_device_down() | ax25_ds_del_timer() | del_timer() | ax25_dev_put() //FREE | | ax25_dev-> //USE
In order to mitigate bugs, when the device is detaching, use timer_shutdown_sync() to stop the timer.(CVE-2024-35887)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tcp: properly terminate timers for kernel sockets
We had various syzbot reports about tcp timers firing after the corresponding netns has been dismantled.
Fortunately Josef Bacik could trigger the issue more often, and could test a patch I wrote two years ago.
When TCP sockets are closed, we call inet_csk_clear_xmit_timers() to 'stop' the timers.
inet_csk_clear_xmit_timers() can be called from any context, including when socket lock is held. This is the reason it uses sk_stop_timer(), aka del_timer(). This means that ongoing timers might finish much later.
For user sockets, this is fine because each running timer holds a reference on the socket, and the user socket holds a reference on the netns.
For kernel sockets, we risk that the netns is freed before timer can complete, because kernel sockets do not hold reference on the netns.
This patch adds inet_csk_clear_xmit_timers_sync() function that using sk_stop_timer_sync() to make sure all timers are terminated before the kernel socket is released. Modules using kernel sockets close them in their netns exit() handler.
Also add sock_not_owned_by_me() helper to get LOCKDEP support : inet_csk_clear_xmit_timers_sync() must not be called while socket lock is held.
It is very possible we can revert in the future commit 3a58f13a881e ("net: rds: acquire refcount on TCP sockets") which attempted to solve the issue in rds only. (net/smc/af_smc.c and net/mptcp/subflow.c have similar code)
We probably can remove the check_net() tests from tcp_out_of_resources() and __tcp_close() in the future.(CVE-2024-35910)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/vc4: don't check if plane->state->fb == state->fb
Currently, when using non-blocking commits, we can see the following kernel warning:
[ 110.908514] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 110.908529] refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free. [ 110.908620] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1866 at lib/refcount.c:87 refcount_dec_not_one+0xb8/0xc0 [ 110.908664] Modules linked in: rfcomm snd_seq_dummy snd_hrtimer snd_seq snd_seq_device cmac algif_hash aes_arm64 aes_generic algif_skcipher af_alg bnep hid_logitech_hidpp vc4 brcmfmac hci_uart btbcm brcmutil bluetooth snd_soc_hdmi_codec cfg80211 cec drm_display_helper drm_dma_helper drm_kms_helper snd_soc_core snd_compress snd_pcm_dmaengine fb_sys_fops sysimgblt syscopyarea sysfillrect raspberrypi_hwmon ecdh_generic ecc rfkill libaes i2c_bcm2835 binfmt_misc joydev snd_bcm2835(C) bcm2835_codec(C) bcm2835_isp(C) v4l2_mem2mem videobuf2_dma_contig snd_pcm bcm2835_v4l2(C) raspberrypi_gpiomem bcm2835_mmal_vchiq(C) videobuf2_v4l2 snd_timer videobuf2_vmalloc videobuf2_memops videobuf2_common snd videodev vc_sm_cma(C) mc hid_logitech_dj uio_pdrv_genirq uio i2c_dev drm fuse dm_mod drm_panel_orientation_quirks backlight ip_tables x_tables ipv6 [ 110.909086] CPU: 0 PID: 1866 Comm: kodi.bin Tainted: G C 6.1.66-v8+ #32 [ 110.909104] Hardware name: Raspberry Pi 3 Model B Rev 1.2 (DT) [ 110.909114] pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 110.909132] pc : refcount_dec_not_one+0xb8/0xc0 [ 110.909152] lr : refcount_dec_not_one+0xb4/0xc0 [ 110.909170] sp : ffffffc00913b9c0 [ 110.909177] x29: ffffffc00913b9c0 x28: 000000556969bbb0 x27: 000000556990df60 [ 110.909205] x26: 0000000000000002 x25: 0000000000000004 x24: ffffff8004448480 [ 110.909230] x23: ffffff800570b500 x22: ffffff802e03a7bc x21: ffffffecfca68c78 [ 110.909257] x20: ffffff8002b42000 x19: ffffff802e03a600 x18: 0000000000000000 [ 110.909283] x17: 0000000000000011 x16: ffffffffffffffff x15: 0000000000000004 [ 110.909308] x14: 0000000000000fff x13: ffffffed577e47e0 x12: 0000000000000003 [ 110.909333] x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 0000000000000027 x9 : c912d0d083728c00 [ 110.909359] x8 : c912d0d083728c00 x7 : 65646e75203a745f x6 : 746e756f63666572 [ 110.909384] x5 : ffffffed579f62ee x4 : ffffffed579eb01e x3 : 0000000000000000 [ 110.909409] x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : ffffffc00913b750 x0 : 0000000000000001 [ 110.909434] Call trace: [ 110.909441] refcount_dec_not_one+0xb8/0xc0 [ 110.909461] vc4_bo_dec_usecnt+0x4c/0x1b0 [vc4] [ 110.909903] vc4_cleanup_fb+0x44/0x50 [vc4] [ 110.910315] drm_atomic_helper_cleanup_planes+0x88/0xa4 [drm_kms_helper] [ 110.910669] vc4_atomic_commit_tail+0x390/0x9dc [vc4] [ 110.911079] commit_tail+0xb0/0x164 [drm_kms_helper] [ 110.911397] drm_atomic_helper_commit+0x1d0/0x1f0 [drm_kms_helper] [ 110.911716] drm_atomic_commit+0xb0/0xdc [drm] [ 110.912569] drm_mode_atomic_ioctl+0x348/0x4b8 [drm] [ 110.913330] drm_ioctl_kernel+0xec/0x15c [drm] [ 110.914091] drm_ioctl+0x24c/0x3b0 [drm] [ 110.914850] __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x9c/0xd4 [ 110.914873] invoke_syscall+0x4c/0x114 [ 110.914897] el0_svc_common+0xd0/0x118 [ 110.914917] do_el0_svc+0x38/0xd0 [ 110.914936] el0_svc+0x30/0x8c [ 110.914958] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xf0 [ 110.914979] el0t_64_sync+0x18c/0x190 [ 110.914996] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
This happens because, although prepare_fb and cleanup_fb are
perfectly balanced, we cannot guarantee consistency in the check
plane->state->fb == state->fb. This means that sometimes we can increase
the refcount in prepare_fb and don't decrease it in cleanup_fb. The
opposite can also be true.
In fact, the struct drm_plane .state shouldn't be accessed directly
but instead, the drm_atomic_get_new_plane_state() helper function should
be used. So, we could stick to this check, but using
drm_atomic_get_new_plane_state(). But actually, this check is not re
---truncated---(CVE-2024-35932)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
btrfs: send: handle path ref underflow in header iterate_inode_ref()
Change BUG_ON to proper error handling if building the path buffer fails. The pointers are not printed so we don't accidentally leak kernel addresses.(CVE-2024-35935)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: cfg80211: check A-MSDU format more carefully
If it looks like there's another subframe in the A-MSDU but the header isn't fully there, we can end up reading data out of bounds, only to discard later. Make this a bit more careful and check if the subframe header can even be present.(CVE-2024-35937)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/panfrost: Fix the error path in panfrost_mmu_map_fault_addr()
Subject: [PATCH] drm/panfrost: Fix the error path in panfrost_mmu_map_fault_addr()
If some the pages or sgt allocation failed, we shouldn't release the pages ref we got earlier, otherwise we will end up with unbalanced get/put_pages() calls. We should instead leave everything in place and let the BO release function deal with extra cleanup when the object is destroyed, or let the fault handler try again next time it's called.(CVE-2024-35951)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: L2CAP: Fix not validating setsockopt user input
Check user input length before copying data.(CVE-2024-35965)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: RFCOMM: Fix not validating setsockopt user input
syzbot reported rfcomm_sock_setsockopt_old() is copying data without checking user input length.
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in copy_from_sockptr_offset include/linux/sockptr.h:49 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in copy_from_sockptr include/linux/sockptr.h:55 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in rfcomm_sock_setsockopt_old net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c:632 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in rfcomm_sock_setsockopt+0x893/0xa70 net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c:673 Read of size 4 at addr ffff8880209a8bc3 by task syz-executor632/5064(CVE-2024-35966)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
batman-adv: Avoid infinite loop trying to resize local TT
If the MTU of one of an attached interface becomes too small to transmit the local translation table then it must be resized to fit inside all fragments (when enabled) or a single packet.
But if the MTU becomes too low to transmit even the header + the VLAN specific part then the resizing of the local TT will never succeed. This can for example happen when the usable space is 110 bytes and 11 VLANs are on top of batman-adv. In this case, at least 116 byte would be needed. There will just be an endless spam of
batman_adv: batadv0: Forced to purge local tt entries to fit new maximum fragment MTU (110)
in the log but the function will never finish. Problem here is that the timeout will be halved all the time and will then stagnate at 0 and therefore never be able to reduce the table even more.
There are other scenarios possible with a similar result. The number of BATADV_TT_CLIENT_NOPURGE entries in the local TT can for example be too high to fit inside a packet. Such a scenario can therefore happen also with only a single VLAN + 7 non-purgable addresses - requiring at least 120 bytes.
While this should be handled proactively when:
- interface with too low MTU is added
- VLAN is added
- non-purgeable local mac is added
- MTU of an attached interface is reduced
- fragmentation setting gets disabled (which most likely requires dropping attached interfaces)
not all of these scenarios can be prevented because batman-adv is only consuming events without the the possibility to prevent these actions (non-purgable MAC address added, MTU of an attached interface is reduced). It is therefore necessary to also make sure that the code is able to handle also the situations when there were already incompatible system configuration are present.(CVE-2024-35982)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tty: n_gsm: fix possible out-of-bounds in gsm0_receive()
Assuming the following: - side A configures the n_gsm in basic option mode - side B sends the header of a basic option mode frame with data length 1 - side A switches to advanced option mode - side B sends 2 data bytes which exceeds gsm->len Reason: gsm->len is not used in advanced option mode. - side A switches to basic option mode - side B keeps sending until gsm0_receive() writes past gsm->buf Reason: Neither gsm->state nor gsm->len have been reset after reconfiguration.
Fix this by changing gsm->count to gsm->len comparison from equal to less than. Also add upper limit checks against the constant MAX_MRU in gsm0_receive() and gsm1_receive() to harden against memory corruption of gsm->len and gsm->mru.
All other checks remain as we still need to limit the data according to the user configuration and actual payload size.(CVE-2024-36016)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
blk-iocost: avoid out of bounds shift
UBSAN catches undefined behavior in blk-iocost, where sometimes iocg->delay is shifted right by a number that is too large, resulting in undefined behavior on some architectures.
[ 186.556576] ------------[ cut here ]------------ UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in block/blk-iocost.c:1366:23 shift exponent 64 is too large for 64-bit type 'u64' (aka 'unsigned long long') CPU: 16 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/16 Tainted: G S E N 6.9.0-0_fbk700_debug_rc2_kbuilder_0_gc85af715cac0 #1 Hardware name: Quanta Twin Lakes MP/Twin Lakes Passive MP, BIOS F09_3A23 12/08/2020 Call Trace: <IRQ> dump_stack_lvl+0x8f/0xe0 __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds+0x22c/0x280 iocg_kick_delay+0x30b/0x310 ioc_timer_fn+0x2fb/0x1f80 __run_timer_base+0x1b6/0x250 ...
Avoid that undefined behavior by simply taking the "delay = 0" branch if the shift is too large.
I am not sure what the symptoms of an undefined value delay will be, but I suspect it could be more than a little annoying to debug.(CVE-2024-36916)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
block: fix overflow in blk_ioctl_discard()
There is no check for overflow of 'start + len' in blk_ioctl_discard(). Hung task occurs if submit an discard ioctl with the following param: start = 0x80000000000ff000, len = 0x8000000000fff000; Add the overflow validation now.(CVE-2024-36917)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: bnx2fc: Remove spin_lock_bh while releasing resources after upload
The session resources are used by FW and driver when session is offloaded, once session is uploaded these resources are not used. The lock is not required as these fields won't be used any longer. The offload and upload calls are sequential, hence lock is not required.
This will suppress following BUG_ON():
[ 449.843143] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 449.848302] kernel BUG at mm/vmalloc.c:2727! [ 449.853072] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI [ 449.858712] CPU: 5 PID: 1996 Comm: kworker/u24:2 Not tainted 5.14.0-118.el9.x86_64 #1 Rebooting. [ 449.867454] Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R730/0WCJNT, BIOS 2.3.4 11/08/2016 [ 449.876966] Workqueue: fc_rport_eq fc_rport_work [libfc] [ 449.882910] RIP: 0010:vunmap+0x2e/0x30 [ 449.887098] Code: 00 65 8b 05 14 a2 f0 4a a9 00 ff ff 00 75 1b 55 48 89 fd e8 34 36 79 00 48 85 ed 74 0b 48 89 ef 31 f6 5d e9 14 fc ff ff 5d c3 <0f> 0b 0f 1f 44 00 00 41 57 41 56 49 89 ce 41 55 49 89 fd 41 54 41 [ 449.908054] RSP: 0018:ffffb83d878b3d68 EFLAGS: 00010206 [ 449.913887] RAX: 0000000080000201 RBX: ffff8f4355133550 RCX: 000000000d400005 [ 449.921843] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000001000 RDI: ffffb83da53f5000 [ 449.929808] RBP: ffff8f4ac6675800 R08: ffffb83d878b3d30 R09: 00000000000efbdf [ 449.937774] R10: 0000000000000003 R11: ffff8f434573e000 R12: 0000000000001000 [ 449.945736] R13: 0000000000001000 R14: ffffb83da53f5000 R15: ffff8f43d4ea3ae0 [ 449.953701] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8f529fc80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 449.962732] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 449.969138] CR2: 00007f8cf993e150 CR3: 0000000efbe10003 CR4: 00000000003706e0 [ 449.977102] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 449.985065] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 449.993028] Call Trace: [ 449.995756] __iommu_dma_free+0x96/0x100 [ 450.000139] bnx2fc_free_session_resc+0x67/0x240 [bnx2fc] [ 450.006171] bnx2fc_upload_session+0xce/0x100 [bnx2fc] [ 450.011910] bnx2fc_rport_event_handler+0x9f/0x240 [bnx2fc] [ 450.018136] fc_rport_work+0x103/0x5b0 [libfc] [ 450.023103] process_one_work+0x1e8/0x3c0 [ 450.027581] worker_thread+0x50/0x3b0 [ 450.031669] ? rescuer_thread+0x370/0x370 [ 450.036143] kthread+0x149/0x170 [ 450.039744] ? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40 [ 450.044411] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [ 450.048404] Modules linked in: vfat msdos fat xfs nfs_layout_nfsv41_files rpcsec_gss_krb5 auth_rpcgss nfsv4 dns_resolver dm_service_time qedf qed crc8 bnx2fc libfcoe libfc scsi_transport_fc intel_rapl_msr intel_rapl_common x86_pkg_temp_thermal intel_powerclamp dcdbas rapl intel_cstate intel_uncore mei_me pcspkr mei ipmi_ssif lpc_ich ipmi_si fuse zram ext4 mbcache jbd2 loop nfsv3 nfs_acl nfs lockd grace fscache netfs irdma ice sd_mod t10_pi sg ib_uverbs ib_core 8021q garp mrp stp llc mgag200 i2c_algo_bit drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt mxm_wmi fb_sys_fops cec crct10dif_pclmul ahci crc32_pclmul bnx2x drm ghash_clmulni_intel libahci rfkill i40e libata megaraid_sas mdio wmi sunrpc lrw dm_crypt dm_round_robin dm_multipath dm_snapshot dm_bufio dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_zero dm_mod linear raid10 raid456 async_raid6_recov async_memcpy async_pq async_xor async_tx raid6_pq libcrc32c crc32c_intel raid1 raid0 iscsi_ibft squashfs be2iscsi bnx2i cnic uio cxgb4i cxgb4 tls [ 450.048497] libcxgbi libcxgb qla4xxx iscsi_boot_sysfs iscsi_tcp libiscsi_tcp libiscsi scsi_transport_iscsi edd ipmi_devintf ipmi_msghandler [ 450.159753] ---[ end trace 712de2c57c64abc8 ]---(CVE-2024-36919)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
s390/qeth: Fix kernel panic after setting hsuid
Symptom: When the hsuid attribute is set for the first time on an IQD Layer3 device while the corresponding network interface is already UP, the kernel will try to execute a napi function pointer that is NULL.
Example:
[ 2057.572696] illegal operation: 0001 ilc:1 [#1] SMP [ 2057.572702] Modules linked in: af_iucv qeth_l3 zfcp scsi_transport_fc sunrpc nft_fib_inet nft_fib_ipv4 nft_fib_ipv6 nft_fib nft_reject_inet nf_reject_ipv4 nf_reject_ipv6 nft_reject nft_ct nf_tables_set nft_chain_nat nf_nat nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4 ip_set nf_tables libcrc32c nfnetlink ghash_s390 prng xts aes_s390 des_s390 de s_generic sha3_512_s390 sha3_256_s390 sha512_s390 vfio_ccw vfio_mdev mdev vfio_iommu_type1 eadm_sch vfio ext4 mbcache jbd2 qeth_l2 bridge stp llc dasd_eckd_mod qeth dasd_mod qdio ccwgroup pkey zcrypt [ 2057.572739] CPU: 6 PID: 60182 Comm: stress_client Kdump: loaded Not tainted 4.18.0-541.el8.s390x #1 [ 2057.572742] Hardware name: IBM 3931 A01 704 (LPAR) [ 2057.572744] Krnl PSW : 0704f00180000000 0000000000000002 (0x2) [ 2057.572748] R:0 T:1 IO:1 EX:1 Key:0 M:1 W:0 P:0 AS:3 CC:3 PM:0 RI:0 EA:3 [ 2057.572751] Krnl GPRS: 0000000000000004 0000000000000000 00000000a3b008d8 0000000000000000 [ 2057.572754] 00000000a3b008d8 cb923a29c779abc5 0000000000000000 00000000814cfd80 [ 2057.572756] 000000000000012c 0000000000000000 00000000a3b008d8 00000000a3b008d8 [ 2057.572758] 00000000bab6d500 00000000814cfd80 0000000091317e46 00000000814cfc68 [ 2057.572762] Krnl Code:#0000000000000000: 0000 illegal >0000000000000002: 0000 illegal 0000000000000004: 0000 illegal 0000000000000006: 0000 illegal 0000000000000008: 0000 illegal 000000000000000a: 0000 illegal 000000000000000c: 0000 illegal 000000000000000e: 0000 illegal [ 2057.572800] Call Trace: [ 2057.572801] ([<00000000ec639700>] 0xec639700) [ 2057.572803] [<00000000913183e2>] net_rx_action+0x2ba/0x398 [ 2057.572809] [<0000000091515f76>] __do_softirq+0x11e/0x3a0 [ 2057.572813] [<0000000090ce160c>] do_softirq_own_stack+0x3c/0x58 [ 2057.572817] ([<0000000090d2cbd6>] do_softirq.part.1+0x56/0x60) [ 2057.572822] [<0000000090d2cc60>] __local_bh_enable_ip+0x80/0x98 [ 2057.572825] [<0000000091314706>] __dev_queue_xmit+0x2be/0xd70 [ 2057.572827] [<000003ff803dd6d6>] afiucv_hs_send+0x24e/0x300 [af_iucv] [ 2057.572830] [<000003ff803dd88a>] iucv_send_ctrl+0x102/0x138 [af_iucv] [ 2057.572833] [<000003ff803de72a>] iucv_sock_connect+0x37a/0x468 [af_iucv] [ 2057.572835] [<00000000912e7e90>] __sys_connect+0xa0/0xd8 [ 2057.572839] [<00000000912e9580>] sys_socketcall+0x228/0x348 [ 2057.572841] [<0000000091514e1a>] system_call+0x2a6/0x2c8 [ 2057.572843] Last Breaking-Event-Address: [ 2057.572844] [<0000000091317e44>] __napi_poll+0x4c/0x1d8 [ 2057.572846] [ 2057.572847] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt
Analysis: There is one napi structure per out_q: card->qdio.out_qs[i].napi The napi.poll functions are set during qeth_open().
Since commit 1cfef80d4c2b ("s390/qeth: Don't call dev_close/dev_open (DOWN/UP)") qeth_set_offline()/qeth_set_online() no longer call dev_close()/ dev_open(). So if qeth_free_qdio_queues() cleared card->qdio.out_qs[i].napi.poll while the network interface was UP and the card was offline, they are not set again.
Reproduction: chzdev -e $devno layer2=0 ip link set dev $network_interface up echo 0 > /sys/bus/ccw ---truncated---(CVE-2024-36928)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: lpfc: Move NPIV's transport unregistration to after resource clean up
There are cases after NPIV deletion where the fabric switch still believes the NPIV is logged into the fabric. This occurs when a vport is unregistered before the Remove All DA_ID CT and LOGO ELS are sent to the fabric.
Currently fc_remove_host(), which calls dev_loss_tmo for all D_IDs including the fabric D_ID, removes the last ndlp reference and frees the ndlp rport object. This sometimes causes the race condition where the final DA_ID and LOGO are skipped from being sent to the fabric switch.
Fix by moving the fc_remove_host() and scsi_remove_host() calls after DA_ID and LOGO are sent.(CVE-2024-36952)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tipc: fix a possible memleak in tipc_buf_append
__skb_linearize() doesn't free the skb when it fails, so move '*buf = NULL' after __skb_linearize(), so that the skb can be freed on the err path.(CVE-2024-36954)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/vmwgfx: Fix invalid reads in fence signaled events
Correctly set the length of the drm_event to the size of the structure that's actually used.
The length of the drm_event was set to the parent structure instead of to the drm_vmw_event_fence which is supposed to be read. drm_read uses the length parameter to copy the event to the user space thus resuling in oob reads.(CVE-2024-36960)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: L2CAP: Fix div-by-zero in l2cap_le_flowctl_init()
l2cap_le_flowctl_init() can cause both div-by-zero and an integer overflow since hdev->le_mtu may not fall in the valid range.
Move MTU from hci_dev to hci_conn to validate MTU and stop the connection process earlier if MTU is invalid. Also, add a missing validation in read_buffer_size() and make it return an error value if the validation fails. Now hci_conn_add() returns ERR_PTR() as it can fail due to the both a kzalloc failure and invalid MTU value.
divide error: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI CPU: 0 PID: 67 Comm: kworker/u5:0 Tainted: G W 6.9.0-rc5+ #20 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 Workqueue: hci0 hci_rx_work RIP: 0010:l2cap_le_flowctl_init+0x19e/0x3f0 net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c:547 Code: e8 17 17 0c 00 66 41 89 9f 84 00 00 00 bf 01 00 00 00 41 b8 02 00 00 00 4c 89 fe 4c 89 e2 89 d9 e8 27 17 0c 00 44 89 f0 31 d2 <66> f7 f3 89 c3 ff c3 4d 8d b7 88 00 00 00 4c 89 f0 48 c1 e8 03 42 RSP: 0018:ffff88810bc0f858 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 00000000000002a0 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: dffffc0000000000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff88810bc0f7c0 RDI: ffffc90002dcb66f RBP: ffff88810bc0f880 R08: aa69db2dda70ff01 R09: 0000ffaaaaaaaaaa R10: 0084000000ffaaaa R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff88810d65a084 R13: dffffc0000000000 R14: 00000000000002a0 R15: ffff88810d65a000 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88811ac00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000020000100 CR3: 0000000103268003 CR4: 0000000000770ef0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> l2cap_le_connect_req net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c:4902 [inline] l2cap_le_sig_cmd net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c:5420 [inline] l2cap_le_sig_channel net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c:5486 [inline] l2cap_recv_frame+0xe59d/0x11710 net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c:6809 l2cap_recv_acldata+0x544/0x10a0 net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c:7506 hci_acldata_packet net/bluetooth/hci_core.c:3939 [inline] hci_rx_work+0x5e5/0xb20 net/bluetooth/hci_core.c:4176 process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3254 [inline] process_scheduled_works+0x90f/0x1530 kernel/workqueue.c:3335 worker_thread+0x926/0xe70 kernel/workqueue.c:3416 kthread+0x2e3/0x380 kernel/kthread.c:388 ret_from_fork+0x5c/0x90 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244 </TASK> Modules linked in: ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---(CVE-2024-36968)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: fix __dst_negative_advice() race
__dst_negative_advice() does not enforce proper RCU rules when sk->dst_cache must be cleared, leading to possible UAF.
RCU rules are that we must first clear sk->sk_dst_cache, then call dst_release(old_dst).
Note that sk_dst_reset(sk) is implementing this protocol correctly, while __dst_negative_advice() uses the wrong order.
Given that ip6_negative_advice() has special logic against RTF_CACHE, this means each of the three ->negative_advice() existing methods must perform the sk_dst_reset() themselves.
Note the check against NULL dst is centralized in __dst_negative_advice(), there is no need to duplicate it in various callbacks.
Many thanks to Clement Lecigne for tracking this issue.
This old bug became visible after the blamed commit, using UDP sockets.(CVE-2024-36971)
| URL | Type | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"kernel-source-5.10.0-136.80.0.160.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-136.80.0.160.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-136.80.0.160.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-136.80.0.160.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.80.0.160.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-136.80.0.160.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-136.80.0.160.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-5.10.0-136.80.0.160.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.80.0.160.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-136.80.0.160.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.80.0.160.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-136.80.0.160.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.80.0.160.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-5.10.0-136.80.0.160.oe2203sp1.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.80.0.160.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-136.80.0.160.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-136.80.0.160.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-136.80.0.160.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-136.80.0.160.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-136.80.0.160.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-136.80.0.160.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-5.10.0-136.80.0.160.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.80.0.160.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-136.80.0.160.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.80.0.160.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.80.0.160.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-136.80.0.160.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP1",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.10.0-136.80.0.160.oe2203sp1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "High"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nafs: Fix corruption in reads at fpos 2G-4G from an OpenAFS server\r\n\r\nAFS-3 has two data fetch RPC variants, FS.FetchData and FS.FetchData64, and\nLinux\u0026apos;s afs client switches between them when talking to a non-YFS server\nif the read size, the file position or the sum of the two have the upper 32\nbits set of the 64-bit value.\r\n\r\nThis is a problem, however, since the file position and length fields of\nFS.FetchData are *signed* 32-bit values.\r\n\r\nFix this by capturing the capability bits obtained from the fileserver when\nit\u0026apos;s sent an FS.GetCapabilities RPC, rather than just discarding them, and\nthen picking out the VICED_CAPABILITY_64BITFILES flag. This can then be\nused to decide whether to use FS.FetchData or FS.FetchData64 - and also\nFS.StoreData or FS.StoreData64 - rather than using upper_32_bits() to\nswitch on the parameter values.\r\n\r\nThis capabilities flag could also be used to limit the maximum size of the\nfile, but all servers must be checked for that.\r\n\r\nNote that the issue does not exist with FS.StoreData - that uses *unsigned*\n32-bit values. It\u0026apos;s also not a problem with Auristor servers as its\nYFS.FetchData64 op uses unsigned 64-bit values.\r\n\r\nThis can be tested by cloning a git repo through an OpenAFS client to an\nOpenAFS server and then doing \u0026quot;git status\u0026quot; on it from a Linux afs\nclient[1]. Provided the clone has a pack file that\u0026apos;s in the 2G-4G range,\nthe git status will show errors like:\r\n\r\n\terror: packfile .git/objects/pack/pack-5e813c51d12b6847bbc0fcd97c2bca66da50079c.pack does not match index\n\terror: packfile .git/objects/pack/pack-5e813c51d12b6847bbc0fcd97c2bca66da50079c.pack does not match index\r\n\r\nThis can be observed in the server\u0026apos;s FileLog with something like the\nfollowing appearing:\r\n\r\nSun Aug 29 19:31:39 2021 SRXAFS_FetchData, Fid = 2303380852.491776.3263114, Host 192.168.11.201:7001, Id 1001\nSun Aug 29 19:31:39 2021 CheckRights: len=0, for host=192.168.11.201:7001\nSun Aug 29 19:31:39 2021 FetchData_RXStyle: Pos 18446744071815340032, Len 3154\nSun Aug 29 19:31:39 2021 FetchData_RXStyle: file size 2400758866\n...\nSun Aug 29 19:31:40 2021 SRXAFS_FetchData returns 5\r\n\r\nNote the file position of 18446744071815340032. This is the requested file\nposition sign-extended.(CVE-2021-47366)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet/smc: Fix possible access to freed memory in link clear\r\n\r\nAfter modifying the QP to the Error state, all RX WR would be completed\nwith WC in IB_WC_WR_FLUSH_ERR status. Current implementation does not\nwait for it is done, but destroy the QP and free the link group directly.\nSo there is a risk that accessing the freed memory in tasklet context.\r\n\r\nHere is a crash example:\r\n\r\n BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffffff8f220860\n #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode\n #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page\n PGD f7300e067 P4D f7300e067 PUD f7300f063 PMD 8c4e45063 PTE 800ffff08c9df060\n Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP PTI\n CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Kdump: loaded Tainted: G S OE 5.10.0-0607+ #23\n Hardware name: Inspur NF5280M4/YZMB-00689-101, BIOS 4.1.20 07/09/2018\n RIP: 0010:native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x176/0x1b0\n Code: f3 90 48 8b 32 48 85 f6 74 f6 eb d5 c1 ee 12 83 e0 03 83 ee 01 48 c1 e0 05 48 63 f6 48 05 00 c8 02 00 48 03 04 f5 00 09 98 8e \u0026lt;48\u0026gt; 89 10 8b 42 08 85 c0 75 09 f3 90 8b 42 08 85 c0 74 f7 48 8b 32\n RSP: 0018:ffffb3b6c001ebd8 EFLAGS: 00010086\n RAX: ffffffff8f220860 RBX: 0000000000000246 RCX: 0000000000080000\n RDX: ffff91db1f86c800 RSI: 000000000000173c RDI: ffff91db62bace00\n RBP: ffff91db62bacc00 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: c00000010000028b\n R10: 0000000000055198 R11: ffffb3b6c001ea58 R12: ffff91db80e05010\n R13: 000000000000000a R14: 0000000000000006 R15: 0000000000000040\n FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff91db1f840000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n CR2: ffffffff8f220860 CR3: 00000001f9580004 CR4: 00000000003706e0\n DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\n DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;IRQ\u0026gt;\n _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x30/0x40\n mlx5_ib_poll_cq+0x4c/0xc50 [mlx5_ib]\n smc_wr_rx_tasklet_fn+0x56/0xa0 [smc]\n tasklet_action_common.isra.21+0x66/0x100\n __do_softirq+0xd5/0x29c\n asm_call_irq_on_stack+0x12/0x20\n \u0026lt;/IRQ\u0026gt;\n do_softirq_own_stack+0x37/0x40\n irq_exit_rcu+0x9d/0xa0\n sysvec_call_function_single+0x34/0x80\n asm_sysvec_call_function_single+0x12/0x20(CVE-2022-48673)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nsoc: brcmstb: pm-arm: Fix refcount leak and __iomem leak bugs\r\n\r\nIn brcmstb_pm_probe(), there are two kinds of leak bugs:\r\n\r\n(1) we need to add of_node_put() when for_each__matching_node() breaks\n(2) we need to add iounmap() for each iomap in fail path(CVE-2022-48693)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nrpmsg: virtio: Free driver_override when rpmsg_remove()\r\n\r\nFree driver_override when rpmsg_remove(), otherwise\nthe following memory leak will occur:\r\n\r\nunreferenced object 0xffff0000d55d7080 (size 128):\n comm \u0026quot;kworker/u8:2\u0026quot;, pid 56, jiffies 4294893188 (age 214.272s)\n hex dump (first 32 bytes):\n 72 70 6d 73 67 5f 6e 73 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 rpmsg_ns........\n 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................\n backtrace:\n [\u0026lt;000000009c94c9c1\u0026gt;] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x1f8/0x320\n [\u0026lt;000000002300d89b\u0026gt;] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x44/0x70\n [\u0026lt;00000000228a60c3\u0026gt;] kstrndup+0x4c/0x90\n [\u0026lt;0000000077158695\u0026gt;] driver_set_override+0xd0/0x164\n [\u0026lt;000000003e9c4ea5\u0026gt;] rpmsg_register_device_override+0x98/0x170\n [\u0026lt;000000001c0c89a8\u0026gt;] rpmsg_ns_register_device+0x24/0x30\n [\u0026lt;000000008bbf8fa2\u0026gt;] rpmsg_probe+0x2e0/0x3ec\n [\u0026lt;00000000e65a68df\u0026gt;] virtio_dev_probe+0x1c0/0x280\n [\u0026lt;00000000443331cc\u0026gt;] really_probe+0xbc/0x2dc\n [\u0026lt;00000000391064b1\u0026gt;] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0xe0\n [\u0026lt;00000000a41c9a5b\u0026gt;] driver_probe_device+0xd8/0x160\n [\u0026lt;000000009c3bd5df\u0026gt;] __device_attach_driver+0xb8/0x140\n [\u0026lt;0000000043cd7614\u0026gt;] bus_for_each_drv+0x7c/0xd4\n [\u0026lt;000000003b929a36\u0026gt;] __device_attach+0x9c/0x19c\n [\u0026lt;00000000a94e0ba8\u0026gt;] device_initial_probe+0x14/0x20\n [\u0026lt;000000003c999637\u0026gt;] bus_probe_device+0xa0/0xac(CVE-2023-52670)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\npipe: wakeup wr_wait after setting max_usage\r\n\r\nCommit c73be61cede5 (\u0026quot;pipe: Add general notification queue support\u0026quot;) a\nregression was introduced that would lock up resized pipes under certain\nconditions. See the reproducer in [1].\r\n\r\nThe commit resizing the pipe ring size was moved to a different\nfunction, doing that moved the wakeup for pipe-\u0026gt;wr_wait before actually\nraising pipe-\u0026gt;max_usage. If a pipe was full before the resize occured it\nwould result in the wakeup never actually triggering pipe_write.\r\n\r\nSet @max_usage and @nr_accounted before waking writers if this isn\u0026apos;t a\nwatch queue.\r\n\r\n[Christian Brauner \u0026lt;brauner@kernel.org\u0026gt;: rewrite to account for watch queues](CVE-2023-52672)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nACPI: video: check for error while searching for backlight device parent\r\n\r\nIf acpi_get_parent() called in acpi_video_dev_register_backlight()\nfails, for example, because acpi_ut_acquire_mutex() fails inside\nacpi_get_parent), this can lead to incorrect (uninitialized)\nacpi_parent handle being passed to acpi_get_pci_dev() for detecting\nthe parent pci device.\r\n\r\nCheck acpi_get_parent() result and set parent device only in case of success.\r\n\r\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2023-52693)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmmc: mmc_spi: fix error handling in mmc_spi_probe()\r\n\r\nIf mmc_add_host() fails, it doesn\u0026apos;t need to call mmc_remove_host(),\nor it will cause null-ptr-deref, because of deleting a not added\ndevice in mmc_remove_host().\r\n\r\nTo fix this, goto label \u0026apos;fail_glue_init\u0026apos;, if mmc_add_host() fails,\nand change the label \u0026apos;fail_add_host\u0026apos; to \u0026apos;fail_gpiod_request\u0026apos;.(CVE-2023-52708)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nceph: blocklist the kclient when receiving corrupted snap trace\r\n\r\nWhen received corrupted snap trace we don\u0026apos;t know what exactly has\nhappened in MDS side. And we shouldn\u0026apos;t continue IOs and metadatas\naccess to MDS, which may corrupt or get incorrect contents.\r\n\r\nThis patch will just block all the further IO/MDS requests\nimmediately and then evict the kclient itself.\r\n\r\nThe reason why we still need to evict the kclient just after\nblocking all the further IOs is that the MDS could revoke the caps\nfaster.(CVE-2023-52732)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nFix page corruption caused by racy check in __free_pages\r\n\r\nWhen we upgraded our kernel, we started seeing some page corruption like\nthe following consistently:\r\n\r\n BUG: Bad page state in process ganesha.nfsd pfn:1304ca\n page:0000000022261c55 refcount:0 mapcount:-128 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x1304ca\n flags: 0x17ffffc0000000()\n raw: 0017ffffc0000000 ffff8a513ffd4c98 ffffeee24b35ec08 0000000000000000\n raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 00000000ffffff7f 0000000000000000\n page dumped because: nonzero mapcount\n CPU: 0 PID: 15567 Comm: ganesha.nfsd Kdump: loaded Tainted: P B O 5.10.158-1.nutanix.20221209.el7.x86_64 #1\n Hardware name: VMware, Inc. VMware Virtual Platform/440BX Desktop Reference Platform, BIOS 6.00 04/05/2016\n Call Trace:\n dump_stack+0x74/0x96\n bad_page.cold+0x63/0x94\n check_new_page_bad+0x6d/0x80\n rmqueue+0x46e/0x970\n get_page_from_freelist+0xcb/0x3f0\n ? _cond_resched+0x19/0x40\n __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x164/0x300\n alloc_pages_current+0x87/0xf0\n skb_page_frag_refill+0x84/0x110\n ...\r\n\r\nSometimes, it would also show up as corruption in the free list pointer\nand cause crashes.\r\n\r\nAfter bisecting the issue, we found the issue started from commit\ne320d3012d25 (\u0026quot;mm/page_alloc.c: fix freeing non-compound pages\u0026quot;):\r\n\r\n\tif (put_page_testzero(page))\n\t\tfree_the_page(page, order);\n\telse if (!PageHead(page))\n\t\twhile (order-- \u0026gt; 0)\n\t\t\tfree_the_page(page + (1 \u0026lt;\u0026lt; order), order);\r\n\r\nSo the problem is the check PageHead is racy because at this point we\nalready dropped our reference to the page. So even if we came in with\ncompound page, the page can already be freed and PageHead can return\nfalse and we will end up freeing all the tail pages causing double free.(CVE-2023-52739)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nIB/hfi1: Restore allocated resources on failed copyout\r\n\r\nFix a resource leak if an error occurs.(CVE-2023-52747)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nvirtio-blk: fix implicit overflow on virtio_max_dma_size\r\n\r\nThe following codes have an implicit conversion from size_t to u32:\n(u32)max_size = (size_t)virtio_max_dma_size(vdev);\r\n\r\nThis may lead overflow, Ex (size_t)4G -\u0026gt; (u32)0. Once\nvirtio_max_dma_size() has a larger size than U32_MAX, use U32_MAX\ninstead.(CVE-2023-52762)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nfs/jfs: Add check for negative db_l2nbperpage\r\n\r\nl2nbperpage is log2(number of blks per page), and the minimum legal\nvalue should be 0, not negative.\r\n\r\nIn the case of l2nbperpage being negative, an error will occur\nwhen subsequently used as shift exponent.\r\n\r\nSyzbot reported this bug:\r\n\r\nUBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c:799:12\nshift exponent -16777216 is negative(CVE-2023-52810)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/panel: fix a possible null pointer dereference\r\n\r\nIn versatile_panel_get_modes(), the return value of drm_mode_duplicate()\nis assigned to mode, which will lead to a NULL pointer dereference\non failure of drm_mode_duplicate(). Add a check to avoid npd.(CVE-2023-52821)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmedia: vidtv: mux: Add check and kfree for kstrdup\r\n\r\nAdd check for the return value of kstrdup() and return the error\nif it fails in order to avoid NULL pointer dereference.\nMoreover, use kfree() in the later error handling in order to avoid\nmemory leak.(CVE-2023-52841)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nhsr: Prevent use after free in prp_create_tagged_frame()\r\n\r\nThe prp_fill_rct() function can fail. In that situation, it frees the\nskb and returns NULL. Meanwhile on the success path, it returns the\noriginal skb. So it\u0026apos;s straight forward to fix bug by using the returned\nvalue.(CVE-2023-52846)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nclk: sunxi-ng: h6: Reparent CPUX during PLL CPUX rate change\r\n\r\nWhile PLL CPUX clock rate change when CPU is running from it works in\nvast majority of cases, now and then it causes instability. This leads\nto system crashes and other undefined behaviour. After a lot of testing\n(30+ hours) while also doing a lot of frequency switches, we can\u0026apos;t\nobserve any instability issues anymore when doing reparenting to stable\nclock like 24 MHz oscillator.(CVE-2023-52882)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nksmbd: validate request buffer size in smb2_allocate_rsp_buf()\r\n\r\nThe response buffer should be allocated in smb2_allocate_rsp_buf\nbefore validating request. But the fields in payload as well as smb2 header\nis used in smb2_allocate_rsp_buf(). This patch add simple buffer size\nvalidation to avoid potencial out-of-bounds in request buffer.(CVE-2024-26936)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nARM: 9359/1: flush: check if the folio is reserved for no-mapping addresses\r\n\r\nSince commit a4d5613c4dc6 (\u0026quot;arm: extend pfn_valid to take into account\nfreed memory map alignment\u0026quot;) changes the semantics of pfn_valid() to check\npresence of the memory map for a PFN. A valid page for an address which\nis reserved but not mapped by the kernel[1], the system crashed during\nsome uio test with the following memory layout:\r\n\r\n node 0: [mem 0x00000000c0a00000-0x00000000cc8fffff]\n node 0: [mem 0x00000000d0000000-0x00000000da1fffff]\n the uio layout is\uff1a0xc0900000, 0x100000\r\n\r\nthe crash backtrace like:\r\n\r\n Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address bff00000\n [...]\n CPU: 1 PID: 465 Comm: startapp.bin Tainted: G O 5.10.0 #1\n Hardware name: Generic DT based system\n PC is at b15_flush_kern_dcache_area+0x24/0x3c\n LR is at __sync_icache_dcache+0x6c/0x98\n [...]\n (b15_flush_kern_dcache_area) from (__sync_icache_dcache+0x6c/0x98)\n (__sync_icache_dcache) from (set_pte_at+0x28/0x54)\n (set_pte_at) from (remap_pfn_range+0x1a0/0x274)\n (remap_pfn_range) from (uio_mmap+0x184/0x1b8 [uio])\n (uio_mmap [uio]) from (__mmap_region+0x264/0x5f4)\n (__mmap_region) from (__do_mmap_mm+0x3ec/0x440)\n (__do_mmap_mm) from (do_mmap+0x50/0x58)\n (do_mmap) from (vm_mmap_pgoff+0xfc/0x188)\n (vm_mmap_pgoff) from (ksys_mmap_pgoff+0xac/0xc4)\n (ksys_mmap_pgoff) from (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x5c)\n Code: e0801001 e2423001 e1c00003 f57ff04f (ee070f3e)\n ---[ end trace 09cf0734c3805d52 ]---\n Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception\r\n\r\nSo check if PG_reserved was set to solve this issue.\r\n\r\n[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Zbtdue57RO0QScJM@linux.ibm.com/(CVE-2024-26947)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nksmbd: fix slab-out-of-bounds in smb_strndup_from_utf16()\r\n\r\nIf -\u0026gt;NameOffset of smb2_create_req is smaller than Buffer offset of\nsmb2_create_req, slab-out-of-bounds read can happen from smb2_open.\nThis patch set the minimum value of the name offset to the buffer offset\nto validate name length of smb2_create_req().(CVE-2024-26954)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmm: swap: fix race between free_swap_and_cache() and swapoff()\r\n\r\nThere was previously a theoretical window where swapoff() could run and\nteardown a swap_info_struct while a call to free_swap_and_cache() was\nrunning in another thread. This could cause, amongst other bad\npossibilities, swap_page_trans_huge_swapped() (called by\nfree_swap_and_cache()) to access the freed memory for swap_map.\r\n\r\nThis is a theoretical problem and I haven\u0026apos;t been able to provoke it from a\ntest case. But there has been agreement based on code review that this is\npossible (see link below).\r\n\r\nFix it by using get_swap_device()/put_swap_device(), which will stall\nswapoff(). There was an extra check in _swap_info_get() to confirm that\nthe swap entry was not free. This isn\u0026apos;t present in get_swap_device()\nbecause it doesn\u0026apos;t make sense in general due to the race between getting\nthe reference and swapoff. So I\u0026apos;ve added an equivalent check directly in\nfree_swap_and_cache().\r\n\r\nDetails of how to provoke one possible issue (thanks to David Hildenbrand\nfor deriving this):\r\n\r\n--8\u0026lt;-----\r\n\r\n__swap_entry_free() might be the last user and result in\n\u0026quot;count == SWAP_HAS_CACHE\u0026quot;.\r\n\r\nswapoff-\u0026gt;try_to_unuse() will stop as soon as soon as si-\u0026gt;inuse_pages==0.\r\n\r\nSo the question is: could someone reclaim the folio and turn\nsi-\u0026gt;inuse_pages==0, before we completed swap_page_trans_huge_swapped().\r\n\r\nImagine the following: 2 MiB folio in the swapcache. Only 2 subpages are\nstill references by swap entries.\r\n\r\nProcess 1 still references subpage 0 via swap entry.\nProcess 2 still references subpage 1 via swap entry.\r\n\r\nProcess 1 quits. Calls free_swap_and_cache().\n-\u0026gt; count == SWAP_HAS_CACHE\n[then, preempted in the hypervisor etc.]\r\n\r\nProcess 2 quits. Calls free_swap_and_cache().\n-\u0026gt; count == SWAP_HAS_CACHE\r\n\r\nProcess 2 goes ahead, passes swap_page_trans_huge_swapped(), and calls\n__try_to_reclaim_swap().\r\n\r\n__try_to_reclaim_swap()-\u0026gt;folio_free_swap()-\u0026gt;delete_from_swap_cache()-\u0026gt;\nput_swap_folio()-\u0026gt;free_swap_slot()-\u0026gt;swapcache_free_entries()-\u0026gt;\nswap_entry_free()-\u0026gt;swap_range_free()-\u0026gt;\n...\nWRITE_ONCE(si-\u0026gt;inuse_pages, si-\u0026gt;inuse_pages - nr_entries);\r\n\r\nWhat stops swapoff to succeed after process 2 reclaimed the swap cache\nbut before process1 finished its call to swap_page_trans_huge_swapped()?\r\n\r\n--8\u0026lt;-----(CVE-2024-26960)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet/mlx5e: Prevent deadlock while disabling aRFS\r\n\r\nWhen disabling aRFS under the `priv-\u0026gt;state_lock`, any scheduled\naRFS works are canceled using the `cancel_work_sync` function,\nwhich waits for the work to end if it has already started.\nHowever, while waiting for the work handler, the handler will\ntry to acquire the `state_lock` which is already acquired.\r\n\r\nThe worker acquires the lock to delete the rules if the state\nis down, which is not the worker\u0026apos;s responsibility since\ndisabling aRFS deletes the rules.\r\n\r\nAdd an aRFS state variable, which indicates whether the aRFS is\nenabled and prevent adding rules when the aRFS is disabled.\r\n\r\nKernel log:\r\n\r\n======================================================\nWARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected\n6.7.0-rc4_net_next_mlx5_5483eb2 #1 Tainted: G I\n------------------------------------------------------\nethtool/386089 is trying to acquire lock:\nffff88810f21ce68 ((work_completion)(\u0026amp;rule-\u0026gt;arfs_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x74/0x4e0\r\n\r\nbut task is already holding lock:\nffff8884a1808cc0 (\u0026amp;priv-\u0026gt;state_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mlx5e_ethtool_set_channels+0x53/0x200 [mlx5_core]\r\n\r\nwhich lock already depends on the new lock.\r\n\r\nthe existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:\r\n\r\n-\u0026gt; #1 (\u0026amp;priv-\u0026gt;state_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:\n __mutex_lock+0x80/0xc90\n arfs_handle_work+0x4b/0x3b0 [mlx5_core]\n process_one_work+0x1dc/0x4a0\n worker_thread+0x1bf/0x3c0\n kthread+0xd7/0x100\n ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x50\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20\r\n\r\n-\u0026gt; #0 ((work_completion)(\u0026amp;rule-\u0026gt;arfs_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:\n __lock_acquire+0x17b4/0x2c80\n lock_acquire+0xd0/0x2b0\n __flush_work+0x7a/0x4e0\n __cancel_work_timer+0x131/0x1c0\n arfs_del_rules+0x143/0x1e0 [mlx5_core]\n mlx5e_arfs_disable+0x1b/0x30 [mlx5_core]\n mlx5e_ethtool_set_channels+0xcb/0x200 [mlx5_core]\n ethnl_set_channels+0x28f/0x3b0\n ethnl_default_set_doit+0xec/0x240\n genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0xd0/0x120\n genl_rcv_msg+0x188/0x2c0\n netlink_rcv_skb+0x54/0x100\n genl_rcv+0x24/0x40\n netlink_unicast+0x1a1/0x270\n netlink_sendmsg+0x214/0x460\n __sock_sendmsg+0x38/0x60\n __sys_sendto+0x113/0x170\n __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30\n do_syscall_64+0x40/0xe0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0x4e\r\n\r\nother info that might help us debug this:\r\n\r\n Possible unsafe locking scenario:\r\n\r\n CPU0 CPU1\n ---- ----\n lock(\u0026amp;priv-\u0026gt;state_lock);\n lock((work_completion)(\u0026amp;rule-\u0026gt;arfs_work));\n lock(\u0026amp;priv-\u0026gt;state_lock);\n lock((work_completion)(\u0026amp;rule-\u0026gt;arfs_work));\r\n\r\n *** DEADLOCK ***\r\n\r\n3 locks held by ethtool/386089:\n #0: ffffffff82ea7210 (cb_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: genl_rcv+0x15/0x40\n #1: ffffffff82e94c88 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ethnl_default_set_doit+0xd3/0x240\n #2: ffff8884a1808cc0 (\u0026amp;priv-\u0026gt;state_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mlx5e_ethtool_set_channels+0x53/0x200 [mlx5_core]\r\n\r\nstack backtrace:\nCPU: 15 PID: 386089 Comm: ethtool Tainted: G I 6.7.0-rc4_net_next_mlx5_5483eb2 #1\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0xa0\n check_noncircular+0x144/0x160\n __lock_acquire+0x17b4/0x2c80\n lock_acquire+0xd0/0x2b0\n ? __flush_work+0x74/0x4e0\n ? save_trace+0x3e/0x360\n ? __flush_work+0x74/0x4e0\n __flush_work+0x7a/0x4e0\n ? __flush_work+0x74/0x4e0\n ? __lock_acquire+0xa78/0x2c80\n ? lock_acquire+0xd0/0x2b0\n ? mark_held_locks+0x49/0x70\n __cancel_work_timer+0x131/0x1c0\n ? mark_held_locks+0x49/0x70\n arfs_del_rules+0x143/0x1e0 [mlx5_core]\n mlx5e_arfs_disable+0x1b/0x30 [mlx5_core]\n mlx5e_ethtool_set_channels+0xcb/0x200 [mlx5_core]\n ethnl_set_channels+0x28f/0x3b0\n ethnl_default_set_doit+0xec/0x240\n genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0xd0/0x120\n genl_rcv_msg+0x188/0x2c0\n ? ethn\n---truncated---(CVE-2024-27014)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnetfilter: nf_tables: Fix potential data-race in __nft_obj_type_get()\r\n\r\nnft_unregister_obj() can concurrent with __nft_obj_type_get(),\nand there is not any protection when iterate over nf_tables_objects\nlist in __nft_obj_type_get(). Therefore, there is potential data-race\nof nf_tables_objects list entry.\r\n\r\nUse list_for_each_entry_rcu() to iterate over nf_tables_objects\nlist in __nft_obj_type_get(), and use rcu_read_lock() in the caller\nnft_obj_type_get() to protect the entire type query process.(CVE-2024-27019)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amd/display: Fix potential NULL pointer dereferences in \u0026apos;dcn10_set_output_transfer_func()\u0026apos;\r\n\r\nThe \u0026apos;stream\u0026apos; pointer is used in dcn10_set_output_transfer_func() before\nthe check if \u0026apos;stream\u0026apos; is NULL.\r\n\r\nFixes the below:\ndrivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/hwss/dcn10/dcn10_hwseq.c:1892 dcn10_set_output_transfer_func() warn: variable dereferenced before check \u0026apos;stream\u0026apos; (see line 1875)(CVE-2024-27044)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: ll_temac: platform_get_resource replaced by wrong function\r\n\r\nThe function platform_get_resource was replaced with\ndevm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname and is called using 0 as name.\r\n\r\nThis eventually ends up in platform_get_resource_byname in the call\nstack, where it causes a null pointer in strcmp.\r\n\r\n\tif (type == resource_type(r) \u0026amp;\u0026amp; !strcmp(r-\u0026gt;name, name))\r\n\r\nIt should have been replaced with devm_platform_ioremap_resource.(CVE-2024-35796)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nfs/aio: Check IOCB_AIO_RW before the struct aio_kiocb conversion\r\n\r\nThe first kiocb_set_cancel_fn() argument may point at a struct kiocb\nthat is not embedded inside struct aio_kiocb. With the current code,\ndepending on the compiler, the req-\u0026gt;ki_ctx read happens either before\nthe IOCB_AIO_RW test or after that test. Move the req-\u0026gt;ki_ctx read such\nthat it is guaranteed that the IOCB_AIO_RW test happens first.(CVE-2024-35815)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nsoc: fsl: qbman: Use raw spinlock for cgr_lock\r\n\r\nsmp_call_function always runs its callback in hard IRQ context, even on\nPREEMPT_RT, where spinlocks can sleep. So we need to use a raw spinlock\nfor cgr_lock to ensure we aren\u0026apos;t waiting on a sleeping task.\r\n\r\nAlthough this bug has existed for a while, it was not apparent until\ncommit ef2a8d5478b9 (\u0026quot;net: dpaa: Adjust queue depth on rate change\u0026quot;)\nwhich invokes smp_call_function_single via qman_update_cgr_safe every\ntime a link goes up or down.(CVE-2024-35819)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nwifi: libertas: fix some memleaks in lbs_allocate_cmd_buffer()\r\n\r\nIn the for statement of lbs_allocate_cmd_buffer(), if the allocation of\ncmdarray[i].cmdbuf fails, both cmdarray and cmdarray[i].cmdbuf needs to\nbe freed. Otherwise, there will be memleaks in lbs_allocate_cmd_buffer().(CVE-2024-35828)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnetfilter: bridge: replace physindev with physinif in nf_bridge_info\r\n\r\nAn skb can be added to a neigh-\u0026gt;arp_queue while waiting for an arp\nreply. Where original skb\u0026apos;s skb-\u0026gt;dev can be different to neigh\u0026apos;s\nneigh-\u0026gt;dev. For instance in case of bridging dnated skb from one veth to\nanother, the skb would be added to a neigh-\u0026gt;arp_queue of the bridge.\r\n\r\nAs skb-\u0026gt;dev can be reset back to nf_bridge-\u0026gt;physindev and used, and as\nthere is no explicit mechanism that prevents this physindev from been\nfreed under us (for instance neigh_flush_dev doesn\u0026apos;t cleanup skbs from\ndifferent device\u0026apos;s neigh queue) we can crash on e.g. this stack:\r\n\r\narp_process\n neigh_update\n skb = __skb_dequeue(\u0026amp;neigh-\u0026gt;arp_queue)\n neigh_resolve_output(..., skb)\n ...\n br_nf_dev_xmit\n br_nf_pre_routing_finish_bridge_slow\n skb-\u0026gt;dev = nf_bridge-\u0026gt;physindev\n br_handle_frame_finish\r\n\r\nLet\u0026apos;s use plain ifindex instead of net_device link. To peek into the\noriginal net_device we will use dev_get_by_index_rcu(). Thus either we\nget device and are safe to use it or we don\u0026apos;t get it and drop skb.(CVE-2024-35839)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nsmb: client: fix UAF in smb2_reconnect_server()\r\n\r\nThe UAF bug is due to smb2_reconnect_server() accessing a session that\nis already being teared down by another thread that is executing\n__cifs_put_smb_ses(). This can happen when (a) the client has\nconnection to the server but no session or (b) another thread ends up\nsetting @ses-\u0026gt;ses_status again to something different than\nSES_EXITING.\r\n\r\nTo fix this, we need to make sure to unconditionally set\n@ses-\u0026gt;ses_status to SES_EXITING and prevent any other threads from\nsetting a new status while we\u0026apos;re still tearing it down.\r\n\r\nThe following can be reproduced by adding some delay to right after\nthe ipc is freed in __cifs_put_smb_ses() - which will give\nsmb2_reconnect_server() worker a chance to run and then accessing\n@ses-\u0026gt;ipc:\r\n\r\nkinit ...\nmount.cifs //srv/share /mnt/1 -o sec=krb5,nohandlecache,echo_interval=10\n[disconnect srv]\nls /mnt/1 \u0026amp;\u0026gt;/dev/null\nsleep 30\nkdestroy\n[reconnect srv]\nsleep 10\numount /mnt/1\n...\nCIFS: VFS: Verify user has a krb5 ticket and keyutils is installed\nCIFS: VFS: \\\\srv Send error in SessSetup = -126\nCIFS: VFS: Verify user has a krb5 ticket and keyutils is installed\nCIFS: VFS: \\\\srv Send error in SessSetup = -126\ngeneral protection fault, probably for non-canonical address\n0x6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI\nCPU: 3 PID: 50 Comm: kworker/3:1 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc2 #1\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-1.fc39\n04/01/2014\nWorkqueue: cifsiod smb2_reconnect_server [cifs]\nRIP: 0010:__list_del_entry_valid_or_report+0x33/0xf0\nCode: 4f 08 48 85 d2 74 42 48 85 c9 74 59 48 b8 00 01 00 00 00 00 ad\nde 48 39 c2 74 61 48 b8 22 01 00 00 00 00 74 69 \u0026lt;48\u0026gt; 8b 01 48 39 f8 75\n7b 48 8b 72 08 48 39 c6 0f 85 88 00 00 00 b8\nRSP: 0018:ffffc900001bfd70 EFLAGS: 00010a83\nRAX: dead000000000122 RBX: ffff88810da53838 RCX: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b\nRDX: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b RSI: ffffffffc02f6878 RDI: ffff88810da53800\nRBP: ffff88810da53800 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000\nR10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff88810c064000\nR13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffff88810c064000 R15: ffff8881039cc000\nFS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff888157c00000(0000)\nknlGS:0000000000000000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: 00007fe3728b1000 CR3: 000000010caa4000 CR4: 0000000000750ef0\nPKRU: 55555554\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n ? die_addr+0x36/0x90\n ? exc_general_protection+0x1c1/0x3f0\n ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30\n ? __list_del_entry_valid_or_report+0x33/0xf0\n __cifs_put_smb_ses+0x1ae/0x500 [cifs]\n smb2_reconnect_server+0x4ed/0x710 [cifs]\n process_one_work+0x205/0x6b0\n worker_thread+0x191/0x360\n ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10\n kthread+0xe2/0x110\n ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10\n ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50\n ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;(CVE-2024-35870)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nax25: fix use-after-free bugs caused by ax25_ds_del_timer\r\n\r\nWhen the ax25 device is detaching, the ax25_dev_device_down()\ncalls ax25_ds_del_timer() to cleanup the slave_timer. When\nthe timer handler is running, the ax25_ds_del_timer() that\ncalls del_timer() in it will return directly. As a result,\nthe use-after-free bugs could happen, one of the scenarios\nis shown below:\r\n\r\n (Thread 1) | (Thread 2)\n | ax25_ds_timeout()\nax25_dev_device_down() |\n ax25_ds_del_timer() |\n del_timer() |\n ax25_dev_put() //FREE |\n | ax25_dev-\u0026gt; //USE\r\n\r\nIn order to mitigate bugs, when the device is detaching, use\ntimer_shutdown_sync() to stop the timer.(CVE-2024-35887)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ntcp: properly terminate timers for kernel sockets\r\n\r\nWe had various syzbot reports about tcp timers firing after\nthe corresponding netns has been dismantled.\r\n\r\nFortunately Josef Bacik could trigger the issue more often,\nand could test a patch I wrote two years ago.\r\n\r\nWhen TCP sockets are closed, we call inet_csk_clear_xmit_timers()\nto \u0026apos;stop\u0026apos; the timers.\r\n\r\ninet_csk_clear_xmit_timers() can be called from any context,\nincluding when socket lock is held.\nThis is the reason it uses sk_stop_timer(), aka del_timer().\nThis means that ongoing timers might finish much later.\r\n\r\nFor user sockets, this is fine because each running timer\nholds a reference on the socket, and the user socket holds\na reference on the netns.\r\n\r\nFor kernel sockets, we risk that the netns is freed before\ntimer can complete, because kernel sockets do not hold\nreference on the netns.\r\n\r\nThis patch adds inet_csk_clear_xmit_timers_sync() function\nthat using sk_stop_timer_sync() to make sure all timers\nare terminated before the kernel socket is released.\nModules using kernel sockets close them in their netns exit()\nhandler.\r\n\r\nAlso add sock_not_owned_by_me() helper to get LOCKDEP\nsupport : inet_csk_clear_xmit_timers_sync() must not be called\nwhile socket lock is held.\r\n\r\nIt is very possible we can revert in the future commit\n3a58f13a881e (\u0026quot;net: rds: acquire refcount on TCP sockets\u0026quot;)\nwhich attempted to solve the issue in rds only.\n(net/smc/af_smc.c and net/mptcp/subflow.c have similar code)\r\n\r\nWe probably can remove the check_net() tests from\ntcp_out_of_resources() and __tcp_close() in the future.(CVE-2024-35910)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/vc4: don\u0026apos;t check if plane-\u0026gt;state-\u0026gt;fb == state-\u0026gt;fb\r\n\r\nCurrently, when using non-blocking commits, we can see the following\nkernel warning:\r\n\r\n[ 110.908514] ------------[ cut here ]------------\n[ 110.908529] refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free.\n[ 110.908620] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1866 at lib/refcount.c:87 refcount_dec_not_one+0xb8/0xc0\n[ 110.908664] Modules linked in: rfcomm snd_seq_dummy snd_hrtimer snd_seq snd_seq_device cmac algif_hash aes_arm64 aes_generic algif_skcipher af_alg bnep hid_logitech_hidpp vc4 brcmfmac hci_uart btbcm brcmutil bluetooth snd_soc_hdmi_codec cfg80211 cec drm_display_helper drm_dma_helper drm_kms_helper snd_soc_core snd_compress snd_pcm_dmaengine fb_sys_fops sysimgblt syscopyarea sysfillrect raspberrypi_hwmon ecdh_generic ecc rfkill libaes i2c_bcm2835 binfmt_misc joydev snd_bcm2835(C) bcm2835_codec(C) bcm2835_isp(C) v4l2_mem2mem videobuf2_dma_contig snd_pcm bcm2835_v4l2(C) raspberrypi_gpiomem bcm2835_mmal_vchiq(C) videobuf2_v4l2 snd_timer videobuf2_vmalloc videobuf2_memops videobuf2_common snd videodev vc_sm_cma(C) mc hid_logitech_dj uio_pdrv_genirq uio i2c_dev drm fuse dm_mod drm_panel_orientation_quirks backlight ip_tables x_tables ipv6\n[ 110.909086] CPU: 0 PID: 1866 Comm: kodi.bin Tainted: G C 6.1.66-v8+ #32\n[ 110.909104] Hardware name: Raspberry Pi 3 Model B Rev 1.2 (DT)\n[ 110.909114] pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)\n[ 110.909132] pc : refcount_dec_not_one+0xb8/0xc0\n[ 110.909152] lr : refcount_dec_not_one+0xb4/0xc0\n[ 110.909170] sp : ffffffc00913b9c0\n[ 110.909177] x29: ffffffc00913b9c0 x28: 000000556969bbb0 x27: 000000556990df60\n[ 110.909205] x26: 0000000000000002 x25: 0000000000000004 x24: ffffff8004448480\n[ 110.909230] x23: ffffff800570b500 x22: ffffff802e03a7bc x21: ffffffecfca68c78\n[ 110.909257] x20: ffffff8002b42000 x19: ffffff802e03a600 x18: 0000000000000000\n[ 110.909283] x17: 0000000000000011 x16: ffffffffffffffff x15: 0000000000000004\n[ 110.909308] x14: 0000000000000fff x13: ffffffed577e47e0 x12: 0000000000000003\n[ 110.909333] x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 0000000000000027 x9 : c912d0d083728c00\n[ 110.909359] x8 : c912d0d083728c00 x7 : 65646e75203a745f x6 : 746e756f63666572\n[ 110.909384] x5 : ffffffed579f62ee x4 : ffffffed579eb01e x3 : 0000000000000000\n[ 110.909409] x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : ffffffc00913b750 x0 : 0000000000000001\n[ 110.909434] Call trace:\n[ 110.909441] refcount_dec_not_one+0xb8/0xc0\n[ 110.909461] vc4_bo_dec_usecnt+0x4c/0x1b0 [vc4]\n[ 110.909903] vc4_cleanup_fb+0x44/0x50 [vc4]\n[ 110.910315] drm_atomic_helper_cleanup_planes+0x88/0xa4 [drm_kms_helper]\n[ 110.910669] vc4_atomic_commit_tail+0x390/0x9dc [vc4]\n[ 110.911079] commit_tail+0xb0/0x164 [drm_kms_helper]\n[ 110.911397] drm_atomic_helper_commit+0x1d0/0x1f0 [drm_kms_helper]\n[ 110.911716] drm_atomic_commit+0xb0/0xdc [drm]\n[ 110.912569] drm_mode_atomic_ioctl+0x348/0x4b8 [drm]\n[ 110.913330] drm_ioctl_kernel+0xec/0x15c [drm]\n[ 110.914091] drm_ioctl+0x24c/0x3b0 [drm]\n[ 110.914850] __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x9c/0xd4\n[ 110.914873] invoke_syscall+0x4c/0x114\n[ 110.914897] el0_svc_common+0xd0/0x118\n[ 110.914917] do_el0_svc+0x38/0xd0\n[ 110.914936] el0_svc+0x30/0x8c\n[ 110.914958] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xf0\n[ 110.914979] el0t_64_sync+0x18c/0x190\n[ 110.914996] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---\r\n\r\nThis happens because, although `prepare_fb` and `cleanup_fb` are\nperfectly balanced, we cannot guarantee consistency in the check\nplane-\u0026gt;state-\u0026gt;fb == state-\u0026gt;fb. This means that sometimes we can increase\nthe refcount in `prepare_fb` and don\u0026apos;t decrease it in `cleanup_fb`. The\nopposite can also be true.\r\n\r\nIn fact, the struct drm_plane .state shouldn\u0026apos;t be accessed directly\nbut instead, the `drm_atomic_get_new_plane_state()` helper function should\nbe used. So, we could stick to this check, but using\n`drm_atomic_get_new_plane_state()`. But actually, this check is not re\n---truncated---(CVE-2024-35932)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbtrfs: send: handle path ref underflow in header iterate_inode_ref()\r\n\r\nChange BUG_ON to proper error handling if building the path buffer\nfails. The pointers are not printed so we don\u0026apos;t accidentally leak kernel\naddresses.(CVE-2024-35935)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nwifi: cfg80211: check A-MSDU format more carefully\r\n\r\nIf it looks like there\u0026apos;s another subframe in the A-MSDU\nbut the header isn\u0026apos;t fully there, we can end up reading\ndata out of bounds, only to discard later. Make this a\nbit more careful and check if the subframe header can\neven be present.(CVE-2024-35937)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/panfrost: Fix the error path in panfrost_mmu_map_fault_addr()\r\n\r\nSubject: [PATCH] drm/panfrost: Fix the error path in\n panfrost_mmu_map_fault_addr()\r\n\r\nIf some the pages or sgt allocation failed, we shouldn\u0026apos;t release the\npages ref we got earlier, otherwise we will end up with unbalanced\nget/put_pages() calls. We should instead leave everything in place\nand let the BO release function deal with extra cleanup when the object\nis destroyed, or let the fault handler try again next time it\u0026apos;s called.(CVE-2024-35951)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nBluetooth: L2CAP: Fix not validating setsockopt user input\r\n\r\nCheck user input length before copying data.(CVE-2024-35965)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nBluetooth: RFCOMM: Fix not validating setsockopt user input\r\n\r\nsyzbot reported rfcomm_sock_setsockopt_old() is copying data without\nchecking user input length.\r\n\r\nBUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in copy_from_sockptr_offset\ninclude/linux/sockptr.h:49 [inline]\nBUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in copy_from_sockptr\ninclude/linux/sockptr.h:55 [inline]\nBUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in rfcomm_sock_setsockopt_old\nnet/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c:632 [inline]\nBUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in rfcomm_sock_setsockopt+0x893/0xa70\nnet/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c:673\nRead of size 4 at addr ffff8880209a8bc3 by task syz-executor632/5064(CVE-2024-35966)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbatman-adv: Avoid infinite loop trying to resize local TT\r\n\r\nIf the MTU of one of an attached interface becomes too small to transmit\nthe local translation table then it must be resized to fit inside all\nfragments (when enabled) or a single packet.\r\n\r\nBut if the MTU becomes too low to transmit even the header + the VLAN\nspecific part then the resizing of the local TT will never succeed. This\ncan for example happen when the usable space is 110 bytes and 11 VLANs are\non top of batman-adv. In this case, at least 116 byte would be needed.\nThere will just be an endless spam of\r\n\r\n batman_adv: batadv0: Forced to purge local tt entries to fit new maximum fragment MTU (110)\r\n\r\nin the log but the function will never finish. Problem here is that the\ntimeout will be halved all the time and will then stagnate at 0 and\ntherefore never be able to reduce the table even more.\r\n\r\nThere are other scenarios possible with a similar result. The number of\nBATADV_TT_CLIENT_NOPURGE entries in the local TT can for example be too\nhigh to fit inside a packet. Such a scenario can therefore happen also with\nonly a single VLAN + 7 non-purgable addresses - requiring at least 120\nbytes.\r\n\r\nWhile this should be handled proactively when:\r\n\r\n* interface with too low MTU is added\n* VLAN is added\n* non-purgeable local mac is added\n* MTU of an attached interface is reduced\n* fragmentation setting gets disabled (which most likely requires dropping\n attached interfaces)\r\n\r\nnot all of these scenarios can be prevented because batman-adv is only\nconsuming events without the the possibility to prevent these actions\n(non-purgable MAC address added, MTU of an attached interface is reduced).\nIt is therefore necessary to also make sure that the code is able to handle\nalso the situations when there were already incompatible system\nconfiguration are present.(CVE-2024-35982)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ntty: n_gsm: fix possible out-of-bounds in gsm0_receive()\r\n\r\nAssuming the following:\n- side A configures the n_gsm in basic option mode\n- side B sends the header of a basic option mode frame with data length 1\n- side A switches to advanced option mode\n- side B sends 2 data bytes which exceeds gsm-\u0026gt;len\n Reason: gsm-\u0026gt;len is not used in advanced option mode.\n- side A switches to basic option mode\n- side B keeps sending until gsm0_receive() writes past gsm-\u0026gt;buf\n Reason: Neither gsm-\u0026gt;state nor gsm-\u0026gt;len have been reset after\n reconfiguration.\r\n\r\nFix this by changing gsm-\u0026gt;count to gsm-\u0026gt;len comparison from equal to less\nthan. Also add upper limit checks against the constant MAX_MRU in\ngsm0_receive() and gsm1_receive() to harden against memory corruption of\ngsm-\u0026gt;len and gsm-\u0026gt;mru.\r\n\r\nAll other checks remain as we still need to limit the data according to the\nuser configuration and actual payload size.(CVE-2024-36016)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nblk-iocost: avoid out of bounds shift\r\n\r\nUBSAN catches undefined behavior in blk-iocost, where sometimes\niocg-\u0026gt;delay is shifted right by a number that is too large,\nresulting in undefined behavior on some architectures.\r\n\r\n[ 186.556576] ------------[ cut here ]------------\nUBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in block/blk-iocost.c:1366:23\nshift exponent 64 is too large for 64-bit type \u0026apos;u64\u0026apos; (aka \u0026apos;unsigned long long\u0026apos;)\nCPU: 16 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/16 Tainted: G S E N 6.9.0-0_fbk700_debug_rc2_kbuilder_0_gc85af715cac0 #1\nHardware name: Quanta Twin Lakes MP/Twin Lakes Passive MP, BIOS F09_3A23 12/08/2020\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;IRQ\u0026gt;\n dump_stack_lvl+0x8f/0xe0\n __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds+0x22c/0x280\n iocg_kick_delay+0x30b/0x310\n ioc_timer_fn+0x2fb/0x1f80\n __run_timer_base+0x1b6/0x250\n...\r\n\r\nAvoid that undefined behavior by simply taking the\n\u0026quot;delay = 0\u0026quot; branch if the shift is too large.\r\n\r\nI am not sure what the symptoms of an undefined value\ndelay will be, but I suspect it could be more than a\nlittle annoying to debug.(CVE-2024-36916)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nblock: fix overflow in blk_ioctl_discard()\r\n\r\nThere is no check for overflow of \u0026apos;start + len\u0026apos; in blk_ioctl_discard().\nHung task occurs if submit an discard ioctl with the following param:\n start = 0x80000000000ff000, len = 0x8000000000fff000;\nAdd the overflow validation now.(CVE-2024-36917)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nscsi: bnx2fc: Remove spin_lock_bh while releasing resources after upload\r\n\r\nThe session resources are used by FW and driver when session is offloaded,\nonce session is uploaded these resources are not used. The lock is not\nrequired as these fields won\u0026apos;t be used any longer. The offload and upload\ncalls are sequential, hence lock is not required.\r\n\r\nThis will suppress following BUG_ON():\r\n\r\n[ 449.843143] ------------[ cut here ]------------\n[ 449.848302] kernel BUG at mm/vmalloc.c:2727!\n[ 449.853072] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI\n[ 449.858712] CPU: 5 PID: 1996 Comm: kworker/u24:2 Not tainted 5.14.0-118.el9.x86_64 #1\nRebooting.\n[ 449.867454] Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R730/0WCJNT, BIOS 2.3.4 11/08/2016\n[ 449.876966] Workqueue: fc_rport_eq fc_rport_work [libfc]\n[ 449.882910] RIP: 0010:vunmap+0x2e/0x30\n[ 449.887098] Code: 00 65 8b 05 14 a2 f0 4a a9 00 ff ff 00 75 1b 55 48 89 fd e8 34 36 79 00 48 85 ed 74 0b 48 89 ef 31 f6 5d e9 14 fc ff ff 5d c3 \u0026lt;0f\u0026gt; 0b 0f 1f 44 00 00 41 57 41 56 49 89 ce 41 55 49 89 fd 41 54 41\n[ 449.908054] RSP: 0018:ffffb83d878b3d68 EFLAGS: 00010206\n[ 449.913887] RAX: 0000000080000201 RBX: ffff8f4355133550 RCX: 000000000d400005\n[ 449.921843] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000001000 RDI: ffffb83da53f5000\n[ 449.929808] RBP: ffff8f4ac6675800 R08: ffffb83d878b3d30 R09: 00000000000efbdf\n[ 449.937774] R10: 0000000000000003 R11: ffff8f434573e000 R12: 0000000000001000\n[ 449.945736] R13: 0000000000001000 R14: ffffb83da53f5000 R15: ffff8f43d4ea3ae0\n[ 449.953701] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8f529fc80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n[ 449.962732] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n[ 449.969138] CR2: 00007f8cf993e150 CR3: 0000000efbe10003 CR4: 00000000003706e0\n[ 449.977102] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\n[ 449.985065] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400\n[ 449.993028] Call Trace:\n[ 449.995756] __iommu_dma_free+0x96/0x100\n[ 450.000139] bnx2fc_free_session_resc+0x67/0x240 [bnx2fc]\n[ 450.006171] bnx2fc_upload_session+0xce/0x100 [bnx2fc]\n[ 450.011910] bnx2fc_rport_event_handler+0x9f/0x240 [bnx2fc]\n[ 450.018136] fc_rport_work+0x103/0x5b0 [libfc]\n[ 450.023103] process_one_work+0x1e8/0x3c0\n[ 450.027581] worker_thread+0x50/0x3b0\n[ 450.031669] ? rescuer_thread+0x370/0x370\n[ 450.036143] kthread+0x149/0x170\n[ 450.039744] ? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40\n[ 450.044411] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30\n[ 450.048404] Modules linked in: vfat msdos fat xfs nfs_layout_nfsv41_files rpcsec_gss_krb5 auth_rpcgss nfsv4 dns_resolver dm_service_time qedf qed crc8 bnx2fc libfcoe libfc scsi_transport_fc intel_rapl_msr intel_rapl_common x86_pkg_temp_thermal intel_powerclamp dcdbas rapl intel_cstate intel_uncore mei_me pcspkr mei ipmi_ssif lpc_ich ipmi_si fuse zram ext4 mbcache jbd2 loop nfsv3 nfs_acl nfs lockd grace fscache netfs irdma ice sd_mod t10_pi sg ib_uverbs ib_core 8021q garp mrp stp llc mgag200 i2c_algo_bit drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt mxm_wmi fb_sys_fops cec crct10dif_pclmul ahci crc32_pclmul bnx2x drm ghash_clmulni_intel libahci rfkill i40e libata megaraid_sas mdio wmi sunrpc lrw dm_crypt dm_round_robin dm_multipath dm_snapshot dm_bufio dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_zero dm_mod linear raid10 raid456 async_raid6_recov async_memcpy async_pq async_xor async_tx raid6_pq libcrc32c crc32c_intel raid1 raid0 iscsi_ibft squashfs be2iscsi bnx2i cnic uio cxgb4i cxgb4 tls\n[ 450.048497] libcxgbi libcxgb qla4xxx iscsi_boot_sysfs iscsi_tcp libiscsi_tcp libiscsi scsi_transport_iscsi edd ipmi_devintf ipmi_msghandler\n[ 450.159753] ---[ end trace 712de2c57c64abc8 ]---(CVE-2024-36919)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ns390/qeth: Fix kernel panic after setting hsuid\r\n\r\nSymptom:\nWhen the hsuid attribute is set for the first time on an IQD Layer3\ndevice while the corresponding network interface is already UP,\nthe kernel will try to execute a napi function pointer that is NULL.\r\n\r\nExample:\n---------------------------------------------------------------------------\n[ 2057.572696] illegal operation: 0001 ilc:1 [#1] SMP\n[ 2057.572702] Modules linked in: af_iucv qeth_l3 zfcp scsi_transport_fc sunrpc nft_fib_inet nft_fib_ipv4 nft_fib_ipv6 nft_fib nft_reject_inet nf_reject_ipv4 nf_reject_ipv6\nnft_reject nft_ct nf_tables_set nft_chain_nat nf_nat nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4 ip_set nf_tables libcrc32c nfnetlink ghash_s390 prng xts aes_s390 des_s390 de\ns_generic sha3_512_s390 sha3_256_s390 sha512_s390 vfio_ccw vfio_mdev mdev vfio_iommu_type1 eadm_sch vfio ext4 mbcache jbd2 qeth_l2 bridge stp llc dasd_eckd_mod qeth dasd_mod\n qdio ccwgroup pkey zcrypt\n[ 2057.572739] CPU: 6 PID: 60182 Comm: stress_client Kdump: loaded Not tainted 4.18.0-541.el8.s390x #1\n[ 2057.572742] Hardware name: IBM 3931 A01 704 (LPAR)\n[ 2057.572744] Krnl PSW : 0704f00180000000 0000000000000002 (0x2)\n[ 2057.572748] R:0 T:1 IO:1 EX:1 Key:0 M:1 W:0 P:0 AS:3 CC:3 PM:0 RI:0 EA:3\n[ 2057.572751] Krnl GPRS: 0000000000000004 0000000000000000 00000000a3b008d8 0000000000000000\n[ 2057.572754] 00000000a3b008d8 cb923a29c779abc5 0000000000000000 00000000814cfd80\n[ 2057.572756] 000000000000012c 0000000000000000 00000000a3b008d8 00000000a3b008d8\n[ 2057.572758] 00000000bab6d500 00000000814cfd80 0000000091317e46 00000000814cfc68\n[ 2057.572762] Krnl Code:#0000000000000000: 0000 illegal\n \u0026gt;0000000000000002: 0000 illegal\n 0000000000000004: 0000 illegal\n 0000000000000006: 0000 illegal\n 0000000000000008: 0000 illegal\n 000000000000000a: 0000 illegal\n 000000000000000c: 0000 illegal\n 000000000000000e: 0000 illegal\n[ 2057.572800] Call Trace:\n[ 2057.572801] ([\u0026lt;00000000ec639700\u0026gt;] 0xec639700)\n[ 2057.572803] [\u0026lt;00000000913183e2\u0026gt;] net_rx_action+0x2ba/0x398\n[ 2057.572809] [\u0026lt;0000000091515f76\u0026gt;] __do_softirq+0x11e/0x3a0\n[ 2057.572813] [\u0026lt;0000000090ce160c\u0026gt;] do_softirq_own_stack+0x3c/0x58\n[ 2057.572817] ([\u0026lt;0000000090d2cbd6\u0026gt;] do_softirq.part.1+0x56/0x60)\n[ 2057.572822] [\u0026lt;0000000090d2cc60\u0026gt;] __local_bh_enable_ip+0x80/0x98\n[ 2057.572825] [\u0026lt;0000000091314706\u0026gt;] __dev_queue_xmit+0x2be/0xd70\n[ 2057.572827] [\u0026lt;000003ff803dd6d6\u0026gt;] afiucv_hs_send+0x24e/0x300 [af_iucv]\n[ 2057.572830] [\u0026lt;000003ff803dd88a\u0026gt;] iucv_send_ctrl+0x102/0x138 [af_iucv]\n[ 2057.572833] [\u0026lt;000003ff803de72a\u0026gt;] iucv_sock_connect+0x37a/0x468 [af_iucv]\n[ 2057.572835] [\u0026lt;00000000912e7e90\u0026gt;] __sys_connect+0xa0/0xd8\n[ 2057.572839] [\u0026lt;00000000912e9580\u0026gt;] sys_socketcall+0x228/0x348\n[ 2057.572841] [\u0026lt;0000000091514e1a\u0026gt;] system_call+0x2a6/0x2c8\n[ 2057.572843] Last Breaking-Event-Address:\n[ 2057.572844] [\u0026lt;0000000091317e44\u0026gt;] __napi_poll+0x4c/0x1d8\n[ 2057.572846]\n[ 2057.572847] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt\n-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------\r\n\r\nAnalysis:\nThere is one napi structure per out_q: card-\u0026gt;qdio.out_qs[i].napi\nThe napi.poll functions are set during qeth_open().\r\n\r\nSince\ncommit 1cfef80d4c2b (\u0026quot;s390/qeth: Don\u0026apos;t call dev_close/dev_open (DOWN/UP)\u0026quot;)\nqeth_set_offline()/qeth_set_online() no longer call dev_close()/\ndev_open(). So if qeth_free_qdio_queues() cleared\ncard-\u0026gt;qdio.out_qs[i].napi.poll while the network interface was UP and the\ncard was offline, they are not set again.\r\n\r\nReproduction:\nchzdev -e $devno layer2=0\nip link set dev $network_interface up\necho 0 \u0026gt; /sys/bus/ccw\n---truncated---(CVE-2024-36928)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nscsi: lpfc: Move NPIV\u0026apos;s transport unregistration to after resource clean up\r\n\r\nThere are cases after NPIV deletion where the fabric switch still believes\nthe NPIV is logged into the fabric. This occurs when a vport is\nunregistered before the Remove All DA_ID CT and LOGO ELS are sent to the\nfabric.\r\n\r\nCurrently fc_remove_host(), which calls dev_loss_tmo for all D_IDs including\nthe fabric D_ID, removes the last ndlp reference and frees the ndlp rport\nobject. This sometimes causes the race condition where the final DA_ID and\nLOGO are skipped from being sent to the fabric switch.\r\n\r\nFix by moving the fc_remove_host() and scsi_remove_host() calls after DA_ID\nand LOGO are sent.(CVE-2024-36952)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ntipc: fix a possible memleak in tipc_buf_append\r\n\r\n__skb_linearize() doesn\u0026apos;t free the skb when it fails, so move\n\u0026apos;*buf = NULL\u0026apos; after __skb_linearize(), so that the skb can be\nfreed on the err path.(CVE-2024-36954)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/vmwgfx: Fix invalid reads in fence signaled events\r\n\r\nCorrectly set the length of the drm_event to the size of the structure\nthat\u0026apos;s actually used.\r\n\r\nThe length of the drm_event was set to the parent structure instead of\nto the drm_vmw_event_fence which is supposed to be read. drm_read\nuses the length parameter to copy the event to the user space thus\nresuling in oob reads.(CVE-2024-36960)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nBluetooth: L2CAP: Fix div-by-zero in l2cap_le_flowctl_init()\r\n\r\nl2cap_le_flowctl_init() can cause both div-by-zero and an integer\noverflow since hdev-\u0026gt;le_mtu may not fall in the valid range.\r\n\r\nMove MTU from hci_dev to hci_conn to validate MTU and stop the connection\nprocess earlier if MTU is invalid.\nAlso, add a missing validation in read_buffer_size() and make it return\nan error value if the validation fails.\nNow hci_conn_add() returns ERR_PTR() as it can fail due to the both a\nkzalloc failure and invalid MTU value.\r\n\r\ndivide error: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI\nCPU: 0 PID: 67 Comm: kworker/u5:0 Tainted: G W 6.9.0-rc5+ #20\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014\nWorkqueue: hci0 hci_rx_work\nRIP: 0010:l2cap_le_flowctl_init+0x19e/0x3f0 net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c:547\nCode: e8 17 17 0c 00 66 41 89 9f 84 00 00 00 bf 01 00 00 00 41 b8 02 00 00 00 4c\n89 fe 4c 89 e2 89 d9 e8 27 17 0c 00 44 89 f0 31 d2 \u0026lt;66\u0026gt; f7 f3 89 c3 ff c3 4d 8d\nb7 88 00 00 00 4c 89 f0 48 c1 e8 03 42\nRSP: 0018:ffff88810bc0f858 EFLAGS: 00010246\nRAX: 00000000000002a0 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: dffffc0000000000\nRDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff88810bc0f7c0 RDI: ffffc90002dcb66f\nRBP: ffff88810bc0f880 R08: aa69db2dda70ff01 R09: 0000ffaaaaaaaaaa\nR10: 0084000000ffaaaa R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff88810d65a084\nR13: dffffc0000000000 R14: 00000000000002a0 R15: ffff88810d65a000\nFS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88811ac00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: 0000000020000100 CR3: 0000000103268003 CR4: 0000000000770ef0\nPKRU: 55555554\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n l2cap_le_connect_req net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c:4902 [inline]\n l2cap_le_sig_cmd net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c:5420 [inline]\n l2cap_le_sig_channel net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c:5486 [inline]\n l2cap_recv_frame+0xe59d/0x11710 net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c:6809\n l2cap_recv_acldata+0x544/0x10a0 net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c:7506\n hci_acldata_packet net/bluetooth/hci_core.c:3939 [inline]\n hci_rx_work+0x5e5/0xb20 net/bluetooth/hci_core.c:4176\n process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3254 [inline]\n process_scheduled_works+0x90f/0x1530 kernel/workqueue.c:3335\n worker_thread+0x926/0xe70 kernel/workqueue.c:3416\n kthread+0x2e3/0x380 kernel/kthread.c:388\n ret_from_fork+0x5c/0x90 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\nModules linked in:\n---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---(CVE-2024-36968)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: fix __dst_negative_advice() race\r\n\r\n__dst_negative_advice() does not enforce proper RCU rules when\nsk-\u0026gt;dst_cache must be cleared, leading to possible UAF.\r\n\r\nRCU rules are that we must first clear sk-\u0026gt;sk_dst_cache,\nthen call dst_release(old_dst).\r\n\r\nNote that sk_dst_reset(sk) is implementing this protocol correctly,\nwhile __dst_negative_advice() uses the wrong order.\r\n\r\nGiven that ip6_negative_advice() has special logic\nagainst RTF_CACHE, this means each of the three -\u0026gt;negative_advice()\nexisting methods must perform the sk_dst_reset() themselves.\r\n\r\nNote the check against NULL dst is centralized in\n__dst_negative_advice(), there is no need to duplicate\nit in various callbacks.\r\n\r\nMany thanks to Clement Lecigne for tracking this issue.\r\n\r\nThis old bug became visible after the blamed commit, using UDP sockets.(CVE-2024-36971)",
"id": "OESA-2024-1737",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:07:12Z",
"published": "2024-06-21T11:07:12Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/en/security/safety-bulletin/detail.html?id=openEuler-SA-2024-1737"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47366"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48673"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48693"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52670"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52672"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52693"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52708"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52732"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52739"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52747"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52762"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52810"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52821"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52841"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52846"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52882"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26936"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26947"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26954"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26960"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27014"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27019"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27044"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35796"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35815"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35819"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35828"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35839"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35870"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35887"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35910"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35932"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35935"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35937"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35951"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35965"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35966"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35982"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36016"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36916"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36917"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36919"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36928"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36952"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36954"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36960"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36968"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36971"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2021-47366",
"CVE-2022-48673",
"CVE-2022-48693",
"CVE-2023-52670",
"CVE-2023-52672",
"CVE-2023-52693",
"CVE-2023-52708",
"CVE-2023-52732",
"CVE-2023-52739",
"CVE-2023-52747",
"CVE-2023-52762",
"CVE-2023-52810",
"CVE-2023-52821",
"CVE-2023-52841",
"CVE-2023-52846",
"CVE-2023-52882",
"CVE-2024-26936",
"CVE-2024-26947",
"CVE-2024-26954",
"CVE-2024-26960",
"CVE-2024-27014",
"CVE-2024-27019",
"CVE-2024-27044",
"CVE-2024-35796",
"CVE-2024-35815",
"CVE-2024-35819",
"CVE-2024-35828",
"CVE-2024-35839",
"CVE-2024-35870",
"CVE-2024-35887",
"CVE-2024-35910",
"CVE-2024-35932",
"CVE-2024-35935",
"CVE-2024-35937",
"CVE-2024-35951",
"CVE-2024-35965",
"CVE-2024-35966",
"CVE-2024-35982",
"CVE-2024-36016",
"CVE-2024-36916",
"CVE-2024-36917",
"CVE-2024-36919",
"CVE-2024-36928",
"CVE-2024-36952",
"CVE-2024-36954",
"CVE-2024-36960",
"CVE-2024-36968",
"CVE-2024-36971"
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.