CVE-2024-31950
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2024-04-07 00:00
Modified
2024-11-20 21:29
Severity ?
6.5 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Summary
In FRRouting (FRR) through 9.1, there can be a buffer overflow and daemon crash in ospf_te_parse_ri for OSPF LSA packets during an attempt to read Segment Routing subTLVs (their size is not validated).
References
cve@mitre.orghttps://github.com/FRRouting/frr/pull/15674/
cve@mitre.orghttps://github.com/FRRouting/frr/pull/15674/commits/6b84541df71772f697a7f9e6b2aaf72536aab775
Impacted products
n/an/a
Show details on NVD website

To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "cvssV3_1": {
              "attackComplexity": "LOW",
              "attackVector": "NETWORK",
              "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
              "baseScore": 6.5,
              "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
              "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
              "integrityImpact": "LOW",
              "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
              "scope": "UNCHANGED",
              "userInteraction": "NONE",
              "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
              "version": "3.1"
            }
          },
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2024-31950",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2024-04-09T19:20:53.822888Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "problemTypes": [
          {
            "descriptions": [
              {
                "cweId": "CWE-120",
                "description": "CWE-120 Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input (\u0027Classic Buffer Overflow\u0027)",
                "lang": "en",
                "type": "CWE"
              }
            ]
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-11-20T21:29:29.067Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      },
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T01:59:50.649Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/pull/15674/"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/pull/15674/commits/6b84541df71772f697a7f9e6b2aaf72536aab775"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "In FRRouting (FRR) through 9.1, there can be a buffer overflow and daemon crash in ospf_te_parse_ri for OSPF LSA packets during an attempt to read Segment Routing subTLVs (their size is not validated)."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "n/a",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2024-04-07T20:13:31.767474",
        "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
        "shortName": "mitre"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/pull/15674/"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/pull/15674/commits/6b84541df71772f697a7f9e6b2aaf72536aab775"
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
    "assignerShortName": "mitre",
    "cveId": "CVE-2024-31950",
    "datePublished": "2024-04-07T00:00:00",
    "dateReserved": "2024-04-07T00:00:00",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-11-20T21:29:29.067Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "meta": {
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2024-31950\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2024-04-07T21:15:07.540\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-04-08T18:48:40.217\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Awaiting Analysis\",\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"In FRRouting (FRR) through 9.1, there can be a buffer overflow and daemon crash in ospf_te_parse_ri for OSPF LSA packets during an attempt to read Segment Routing subTLVs (their size is not validated).\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"En FRRouting (FRR) hasta 9.1, puede haber un desbordamiento del b\u00fafer y un bloqueo del daemon en ospf_te_parse_ri para paquetes OSPF LSA durante un intento de leer subTLV de enrutamiento de segmentos (su tama\u00f1o no est\u00e1 validado).\"}],\"metrics\":{},\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/pull/15674/\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/pull/15674/commits/6b84541df71772f697a7f9e6b2aaf72536aab775\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"}]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.