Action not permitted
Modal body text goes here.
Modal Title
Modal Body
CVE-2024-42321 (GCVE-0-2024-42321)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2024-08-17 09:09 – Updated: 2026-05-11 20:30| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux |
Affected:
9b52e3f267a6835efd50ed9002d530666d16a411 , < eb03d9826aa646577342a952d658d4598381c035
(git)
Affected: 9b52e3f267a6835efd50ed9002d530666d16a411 , < 4afbac11f2f629d1e62817c4e210bdfaa7521107 (git) Affected: 9b52e3f267a6835efd50ed9002d530666d16a411 , < c5d21aabf1b31a79f228508af33aee83456bc1b0 (git) Affected: 9b52e3f267a6835efd50ed9002d530666d16a411 , < 120f1c857a73e52132e473dee89b340440cb692b (git) |
guessed | |
| Linux | Linux |
Affected:
5.2
Unaffected: 0 , < 5.2 (semver) Unaffected: 6.1.103 , ≤ 6.1.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.6.44 , ≤ 6.6.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.10.3 , ≤ 6.10.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.11 , ≤ * (original_commit_for_fix) |
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-42321",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-09-10T16:09:25.850374Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-09-12T17:33:25.817Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-03T22:04:40.152Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/01/msg00001.html"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"net/core/flow_dissector.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "eb03d9826aa646577342a952d658d4598381c035",
"status": "affected",
"version": "9b52e3f267a6835efd50ed9002d530666d16a411",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "4afbac11f2f629d1e62817c4e210bdfaa7521107",
"status": "affected",
"version": "9b52e3f267a6835efd50ed9002d530666d16a411",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "c5d21aabf1b31a79f228508af33aee83456bc1b0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "9b52e3f267a6835efd50ed9002d530666d16a411",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "120f1c857a73e52132e473dee89b340440cb692b",
"status": "affected",
"version": "9b52e3f267a6835efd50ed9002d530666d16a411",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"net/core/flow_dissector.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.2"
},
{
"lessThan": "5.2",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.103",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.44",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.10.3",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.11",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.103",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.2",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.44",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.2",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.10.3",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.2",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.11",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.2",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: flow_dissector: use DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE\n\nThe following splat is easy to reproduce upstream as well as in -stable\nkernels. Florian Westphal provided the following commit:\n\n d1dab4f71d37 (\"net: add and use __skb_get_hash_symmetric_net\")\n\nbut this complementary fix has been also suggested by Willem de Bruijn\nand it can be easily backported to -stable kernel which consists in\nusing DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE instead to silence the following splat\ngiven __skb_get_hash() is used by the nftables tracing infrastructure to\nto identify packets in traces.\n\n[69133.561393] ------------[ cut here ]------------\n[69133.561404] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 43576 at net/core/flow_dissector.c:1104 __skb_flow_dissect+0x134f/\n[...]\n[69133.561944] CPU: 0 PID: 43576 Comm: socat Not tainted 6.10.0-rc7+ #379\n[69133.561959] RIP: 0010:__skb_flow_dissect+0x134f/0x2ad0\n[69133.561970] Code: 83 f9 04 0f 84 b3 00 00 00 45 85 c9 0f 84 aa 00 00 00 41 83 f9 02 0f 84 81 fc ff\nff 44 0f b7 b4 24 80 00 00 00 e9 8b f9 ff ff \u003c0f\u003e 0b e9 20 f3 ff ff 41 f6 c6 20 0f 84 e4 ef ff ff 48 8d 7b 12 e8\n[69133.561979] RSP: 0018:ffffc90000006fc0 EFLAGS: 00010246\n[69133.561988] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffff82f33e20 RCX: ffffffff81ab7e19\n[69133.561994] RDX: dffffc0000000000 RSI: ffffc90000007388 RDI: ffff888103a1b418\n[69133.562001] RBP: ffffc90000007310 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000\n[69133.562007] R10: ffffc90000007388 R11: ffffffff810cface R12: ffff888103a1b400\n[69133.562013] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffffffff82f33e2a R15: ffffffff82f33e28\n[69133.562020] FS: 00007f40f7131740(0000) GS:ffff888390800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n[69133.562027] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n[69133.562033] CR2: 00007f40f7346ee0 CR3: 000000015d200001 CR4: 00000000001706f0\n[69133.562040] Call Trace:\n[69133.562044] \u003cIRQ\u003e\n[69133.562049] ? __warn+0x9f/0x1a0\n[ 1211.841384] ? __skb_flow_dissect+0x107e/0x2860\n[...]\n[ 1211.841496] ? bpf_flow_dissect+0x160/0x160\n[ 1211.841753] __skb_get_hash+0x97/0x280\n[ 1211.841765] ? __skb_get_hash_symmetric+0x230/0x230\n[ 1211.841776] ? mod_find+0xbf/0xe0\n[ 1211.841786] ? get_stack_info_noinstr+0x12/0xe0\n[ 1211.841798] ? bpf_ksym_find+0x56/0xe0\n[ 1211.841807] ? __rcu_read_unlock+0x2a/0x70\n[ 1211.841819] nft_trace_init+0x1b9/0x1c0 [nf_tables]\n[ 1211.841895] ? nft_trace_notify+0x830/0x830 [nf_tables]\n[ 1211.841964] ? get_stack_info+0x2b/0x80\n[ 1211.841975] ? nft_do_chain_arp+0x80/0x80 [nf_tables]\n[ 1211.842044] nft_do_chain+0x79c/0x850 [nf_tables]"
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-11T20:30:11.865Z",
"orgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"shortName": "Linux"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/eb03d9826aa646577342a952d658d4598381c035"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4afbac11f2f629d1e62817c4e210bdfaa7521107"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c5d21aabf1b31a79f228508af33aee83456bc1b0"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/120f1c857a73e52132e473dee89b340440cb692b"
}
],
"title": "net: flow_dissector: use DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "bippy-1.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"assignerShortName": "Linux",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-42321",
"datePublished": "2024-08-17T09:09:33.505Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-07-30T07:40:12.279Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-11T20:30:11.865Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2024-42321",
"date": "2026-09-29",
"epss": "0.0021",
"percentile": "0.10059"
},
"fkie_nvd": {
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: flow_dissector: use DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE\n\nThe following splat is easy to reproduce upstream as well as in -stable\nkernels. Florian Westphal provided the following commit:\n\n d1dab4f71d37 (\"net: add and use __skb_get_hash_symmetric_net\")\n\nbut this complementary fix has been also suggested by Willem de Bruijn\nand it can be easily backported to -stable kernel which consists in\nusing DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE instead to silence the following splat\ngiven __skb_get_hash() is used by the nftables tracing infrastructure to\nto identify packets in traces.\n\n[69133.561393] ------------[ cut here ]------------\n[69133.561404] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 43576 at net/core/flow_dissector.c:1104 __skb_flow_dissect+0x134f/\n[...]\n[69133.561944] CPU: 0 PID: 43576 Comm: socat Not tainted 6.10.0-rc7+ #379\n[69133.561959] RIP: 0010:__skb_flow_dissect+0x134f/0x2ad0\n[69133.561970] Code: 83 f9 04 0f 84 b3 00 00 00 45 85 c9 0f 84 aa 00 00 00 41 83 f9 02 0f 84 81 fc ff\nff 44 0f b7 b4 24 80 00 00 00 e9 8b f9 ff ff \u003c0f\u003e 0b e9 20 f3 ff ff 41 f6 c6 20 0f 84 e4 ef ff ff 48 8d 7b 12 e8\n[69133.561979] RSP: 0018:ffffc90000006fc0 EFLAGS: 00010246\n[69133.561988] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffff82f33e20 RCX: ffffffff81ab7e19\n[69133.561994] RDX: dffffc0000000000 RSI: ffffc90000007388 RDI: ffff888103a1b418\n[69133.562001] RBP: ffffc90000007310 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000\n[69133.562007] R10: ffffc90000007388 R11: ffffffff810cface R12: ffff888103a1b400\n[69133.562013] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffffffff82f33e2a R15: ffffffff82f33e28\n[69133.562020] FS: 00007f40f7131740(0000) GS:ffff888390800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n[69133.562027] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n[69133.562033] CR2: 00007f40f7346ee0 CR3: 000000015d200001 CR4: 00000000001706f0\n[69133.562040] Call Trace:\n[69133.562044] \u003cIRQ\u003e\n[69133.562049] ? __warn+0x9f/0x1a0\n[ 1211.841384] ? __skb_flow_dissect+0x107e/0x2860\n[...]\n[ 1211.841496] ? bpf_flow_dissect+0x160/0x160\n[ 1211.841753] __skb_get_hash+0x97/0x280\n[ 1211.841765] ? __skb_get_hash_symmetric+0x230/0x230\n[ 1211.841776] ? mod_find+0xbf/0xe0\n[ 1211.841786] ? get_stack_info_noinstr+0x12/0xe0\n[ 1211.841798] ? bpf_ksym_find+0x56/0xe0\n[ 1211.841807] ? __rcu_read_unlock+0x2a/0x70\n[ 1211.841819] nft_trace_init+0x1b9/0x1c0 [nf_tables]\n[ 1211.841895] ? nft_trace_notify+0x830/0x830 [nf_tables]\n[ 1211.841964] ? get_stack_info+0x2b/0x80\n[ 1211.841975] ? nft_do_chain_arp+0x80/0x80 [nf_tables]\n[ 1211.842044] nft_do_chain+0x79c/0x850 [nf_tables]"
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: net: flow_dissector: use DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE El siguiente s\u00edmbolo es f\u00e1cil de reproducir tanto en n\u00facleos anteriores como en n\u00facleos estables. Florian Westphal proporcion\u00f3 la siguiente confirmaci\u00f3n: d1dab4f71d37 (\"net: add and use __skb_get_hash_metric_net\") pero Willem de Bruijn tambi\u00e9n sugiri\u00f3 esta soluci\u00f3n complementaria y se puede retroportar f\u00e1cilmente al kernel estable, que consiste en usar DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE en lugar de silenciar lo siguiente splat dado __skb_get_hash() es utilizado por la infraestructura de seguimiento de nftables para identificar paquetes en los seguimientos. [69133.561393] ------------[ cortar aqu\u00ed ]------------ [69133.561404] ADVERTENCIA: CPU: 0 PID: 43576 en net/core/flow_dissector.c :1104 __skb_flow_dissect+0x134f/ [...] [69133.561944] CPU: 0 PID: 43576 Comm: socat No contaminado 6.10.0-rc7+ #379 [69133.561959] RIP: 0010:__skb_flow_dissect+0x134f/0x2ad0 133.561970] C\u00f3digo: 83 f9 04 0f 84 b3 00 00 00 45 85 c9 0f 84 aa 00 00 00 41 83 f9 02 0f 84 81 fc ff ff 44 0f b7 b4 24 80 00 00 00 e9 8b f9 ff ff \u0026lt;0f\u0026gt; 0b e9 20 ff ff 41 f6 c6 20 0f 84 e4 ef ff ff 48 8d 7b 12 e8 [69133.561979] RSP: 0018:ffffc90000006fc0 EFLAGS: 00010246 [69133.561988] RAX: 00000000000000000 RBX: ffffffff82f33e20 RCX: ffffffff81ab7e19 [69133.561994] RDX: dffffc0000000000 RSI: ffffc900000007388 RDI: ffff888103a1b418 [69133.562001] RBP: ffffc90000007310 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [69133.562007] R10: ffffc90000007388 R11: fffffff810cface 2: ffff888103a1b400 [69133.562013] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffffffff82f33e2a R15: ffffffff82f33e28 [69133.562020] FS: 00007f40f7131740(000 0) GS:ffff888390800000(0000 ) knlGS:0000000000000000 [69133.562027] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [69133.562033] CR2: 00007f40f7346ee0 CR3: 5d200001 CR4: 00000000001706f0 [69133.562040] Seguimiento de llamadas: [69133.562044] [69133.562049] ? __advertir+0x9f/0x1a0 [ 1211.841384] ? __skb_flow_dissect+0x107e/0x2860 [...] [ 1211.841496] ? bpf_flow_dissect+0x160/0x160 [ 1211.841753] __skb_get_hash+0x97/0x280 [ 1211.841765] ? __skb_get_hash_metric+0x230/0x230 [1211.841776]? mod_find+0xbf/0xe0 [1211.841786]? get_stack_info_noinstr+0x12/0xe0 [1211.841798]? bpf_ksym_find+0x56/0xe0 [1211.841807]? __rcu_read_unlock+0x2a/0x70 [1211.841819] nft_trace_init+0x1b9/0x1c0 [nf_tables] [1211.841895]? nft_trace_notify+0x830/0x830 [nf_tables] [1211.841964]? get_stack_info+0x2b/0x80 [1211.841975]? nft_do_chain_arp+0x80/0x80 [nf_tables] [ 1211.842044] nft_do_chain+0x79c/0x850 [nf_tables]"
}
],
"id": "CVE-2024-42321",
"lastModified": "2024-08-19T12:59:59.177",
"published": "2024-08-17T09:15:11.917",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/120f1c857a73e52132e473dee89b340440cb692b"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4afbac11f2f629d1e62817c4e210bdfaa7521107"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c5d21aabf1b31a79f228508af33aee83456bc1b0"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/eb03d9826aa646577342a952d658d4598381c035"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"net/core/flow_dissector.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "eb03d9826aa646577342a952d658d4598381c035",
"status": "affected",
"version": "9b52e3f267a6835efd50ed9002d530666d16a411",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "4afbac11f2f629d1e62817c4e210bdfaa7521107",
"status": "affected",
"version": "9b52e3f267a6835efd50ed9002d530666d16a411",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "c5d21aabf1b31a79f228508af33aee83456bc1b0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "9b52e3f267a6835efd50ed9002d530666d16a411",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "120f1c857a73e52132e473dee89b340440cb692b",
"status": "affected",
"version": "9b52e3f267a6835efd50ed9002d530666d16a411",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"net/core/flow_dissector.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.2"
},
{
"lessThan": "5.2",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.103",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.44",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.10.3",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.11",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "F0D49D07-075D-4CF5-903C-FB02B26570CB",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.103",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.2",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "CC912330-6B41-4C6B-99AF-F3857FBACB6A",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.44",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.2",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "92D388F2-1EAF-4CFA-AC06-5B26D762EA7D",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.10.3",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.7",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: flow_dissector: use DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE\n\nThe following splat is easy to reproduce upstream as well as in -stable\nkernels. Florian Westphal provided the following commit:\n\n d1dab4f71d37 (\"net: add and use __skb_get_hash_symmetric_net\")\n\nbut this complementary fix has been also suggested by Willem de Bruijn\nand it can be easily backported to -stable kernel which consists in\nusing DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE instead to silence the following splat\ngiven __skb_get_hash() is used by the nftables tracing infrastructure to\nto identify packets in traces.\n\n[69133.561393] ------------[ cut here ]------------\n[69133.561404] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 43576 at net/core/flow_dissector.c:1104 __skb_flow_dissect+0x134f/\n[...]\n[69133.561944] CPU: 0 PID: 43576 Comm: socat Not tainted 6.10.0-rc7+ #379\n[69133.561959] RIP: 0010:__skb_flow_dissect+0x134f/0x2ad0\n[69133.561970] Code: 83 f9 04 0f 84 b3 00 00 00 45 85 c9 0f 84 aa 00 00 00 41 83 f9 02 0f 84 81 fc ff\nff 44 0f b7 b4 24 80 00 00 00 e9 8b f9 ff ff \u003c0f\u003e 0b e9 20 f3 ff ff 41 f6 c6 20 0f 84 e4 ef ff ff 48 8d 7b 12 e8\n[69133.561979] RSP: 0018:ffffc90000006fc0 EFLAGS: 00010246\n[69133.561988] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffff82f33e20 RCX: ffffffff81ab7e19\n[69133.561994] RDX: dffffc0000000000 RSI: ffffc90000007388 RDI: ffff888103a1b418\n[69133.562001] RBP: ffffc90000007310 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000\n[69133.562007] R10: ffffc90000007388 R11: ffffffff810cface R12: ffff888103a1b400\n[69133.562013] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffffffff82f33e2a R15: ffffffff82f33e28\n[69133.562020] FS: 00007f40f7131740(0000) GS:ffff888390800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n[69133.562027] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n[69133.562033] CR2: 00007f40f7346ee0 CR3: 000000015d200001 CR4: 00000000001706f0\n[69133.562040] Call Trace:\n[69133.562044] \u003cIRQ\u003e\n[69133.562049] ? __warn+0x9f/0x1a0\n[ 1211.841384] ? __skb_flow_dissect+0x107e/0x2860\n[...]\n[ 1211.841496] ? bpf_flow_dissect+0x160/0x160\n[ 1211.841753] __skb_get_hash+0x97/0x280\n[ 1211.841765] ? __skb_get_hash_symmetric+0x230/0x230\n[ 1211.841776] ? mod_find+0xbf/0xe0\n[ 1211.841786] ? get_stack_info_noinstr+0x12/0xe0\n[ 1211.841798] ? bpf_ksym_find+0x56/0xe0\n[ 1211.841807] ? __rcu_read_unlock+0x2a/0x70\n[ 1211.841819] nft_trace_init+0x1b9/0x1c0 [nf_tables]\n[ 1211.841895] ? nft_trace_notify+0x830/0x830 [nf_tables]\n[ 1211.841964] ? get_stack_info+0x2b/0x80\n[ 1211.841975] ? nft_do_chain_arp+0x80/0x80 [nf_tables]\n[ 1211.842044] nft_do_chain+0x79c/0x850 [nf_tables]"
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: net: flow_dissector: use DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE El siguiente s\u00edmbolo es f\u00e1cil de reproducir tanto en n\u00facleos anteriores como en n\u00facleos estables. Florian Westphal proporcion\u00f3 la siguiente confirmaci\u00f3n: d1dab4f71d37 (\"net: add and use __skb_get_hash_metric_net\") pero Willem de Bruijn tambi\u00e9n sugiri\u00f3 esta soluci\u00f3n complementaria y se puede retroportar f\u00e1cilmente al kernel estable, que consiste en usar DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE en lugar de silenciar lo siguiente splat dado __skb_get_hash() es utilizado por la infraestructura de seguimiento de nftables para identificar paquetes en los seguimientos. [69133.561393] ------------[ cortar aqu\u00ed ]------------ [69133.561404] ADVERTENCIA: CPU: 0 PID: 43576 en net/core/flow_dissector.c :1104 __skb_flow_dissect+0x134f/ [...] [69133.561944] CPU: 0 PID: 43576 Comm: socat No contaminado 6.10.0-rc7+ #379 [69133.561959] RIP: 0010:__skb_flow_dissect+0x134f/0x2ad0 133.561970] C\u00f3digo: 83 f9 04 0f 84 b3 00 00 00 45 85 c9 0f 84 aa 00 00 00 41 83 f9 02 0f 84 81 fc ff ff 44 0f b7 b4 24 80 00 00 00 e9 8b f9 ff ff \u0026lt;0f\u0026gt; 0b e9 20 ff ff 41 f6 c6 20 0f 84 e4 ef ff ff 48 8d 7b 12 e8 [69133.561979] RSP: 0018:ffffc90000006fc0 EFLAGS: 00010246 [69133.561988] RAX: 00000000000000000 RBX: ffffffff82f33e20 RCX: ffffffff81ab7e19 [69133.561994] RDX: dffffc0000000000 RSI: ffffc900000007388 RDI: ffff888103a1b418 [69133.562001] RBP: ffffc90000007310 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [69133.562007] R10: ffffc90000007388 R11: fffffff810cface 2: ffff888103a1b400 [69133.562013] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffffffff82f33e2a R15: ffffffff82f33e28 [69133.562020] FS: 00007f40f7131740(000 0) GS:ffff888390800000(0000 ) knlGS:0000000000000000 [69133.562027] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [69133.562033] CR2: 00007f40f7346ee0 CR3: 5d200001 CR4: 00000000001706f0 [69133.562040] Seguimiento de llamadas: [69133.562044] [69133.562049] ? __advertir+0x9f/0x1a0 [ 1211.841384] ? __skb_flow_dissect+0x107e/0x2860 [...] [ 1211.841496] ? bpf_flow_dissect+0x160/0x160 [ 1211.841753] __skb_get_hash+0x97/0x280 [ 1211.841765] ? __skb_get_hash_metric+0x230/0x230 [1211.841776]? mod_find+0xbf/0xe0 [1211.841786]? get_stack_info_noinstr+0x12/0xe0 [1211.841798]? bpf_ksym_find+0x56/0xe0 [1211.841807]? __rcu_read_unlock+0x2a/0x70 [1211.841819] nft_trace_init+0x1b9/0x1c0 [nf_tables] [1211.841895]? nft_trace_notify+0x830/0x830 [nf_tables] [1211.841964]? get_stack_info+0x2b/0x80 [1211.841975]? nft_do_chain_arp+0x80/0x80 [nf_tables] [ 1211.842044] nft_do_chain+0x79c/0x850 [nf_tables]"
}
],
"id": "CVE-2024-42321",
"lastModified": "2026-06-17T07:49:15.390",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 5.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2024-42321",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-09-10T16:09:25.850374Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2024-08-17T09:15:11.917",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/120f1c857a73e52132e473dee89b340440cb692b"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4afbac11f2f629d1e62817c4e210bdfaa7521107"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c5d21aabf1b31a79f228508af33aee83456bc1b0"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/eb03d9826aa646577342a952d658d4598381c035"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/01/msg00001.html"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "NVD-CWE-noinfo"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"aggregate_severity": "Low",
"current_release_date": "2026-06-28T08:05:55+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2024-42321",
"id": "CVE-2024-42321",
"initial_release_date": "2024-08-17T00:00:00+00:00",
"product_status:fixed": "305",
"product_status:known_affected": "112",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "kernel: net: flow_dissector: use DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2024/cve-2024-42321.json",
"version": "3"
},
"suse_vex": {
"aggregate_severity": "moderate",
"current_release_date": "2026-09-11T02:14:35Z",
"cve": "CVE-2024-42321",
"id": "CVE-2024-42321",
"initial_release_date": "2024-08-18T02:02:05Z",
"product_status:known_affected": "232",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "160",
"product_status:recommended": "43",
"source": "SUSE CSAF VEX",
"status": "interim",
"title": "SUSE CVE CVE-2024-42321",
"url": "https://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/security/csaf-vex/cve-2024-42321.json",
"version": "48"
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2024-42321",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-09-10T16:09:25.850374Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-09-11T12:42:23.334Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"net/core/flow_dissector.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "eb03d9826aa646577342a952d658d4598381c035",
"status": "affected",
"version": "9b52e3f267a6835efd50ed9002d530666d16a411",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "4afbac11f2f629d1e62817c4e210bdfaa7521107",
"status": "affected",
"version": "9b52e3f267a6835efd50ed9002d530666d16a411",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "c5d21aabf1b31a79f228508af33aee83456bc1b0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "9b52e3f267a6835efd50ed9002d530666d16a411",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "120f1c857a73e52132e473dee89b340440cb692b",
"status": "affected",
"version": "9b52e3f267a6835efd50ed9002d530666d16a411",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"net/core/flow_dissector.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.2"
},
{
"lessThan": "5.2",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.103",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.44",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.10.3",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.11",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: flow_dissector: use DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE\n\nThe following splat is easy to reproduce upstream as well as in -stable\nkernels. Florian Westphal provided the following commit:\n\n d1dab4f71d37 (\"net: add and use __skb_get_hash_symmetric_net\")\n\nbut this complementary fix has been also suggested by Willem de Bruijn\nand it can be easily backported to -stable kernel which consists in\nusing DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE instead to silence the following splat\ngiven __skb_get_hash() is used by the nftables tracing infrastructure to\nto identify packets in traces.\n\n[69133.561393] ------------[ cut here ]------------\n[69133.561404] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 43576 at net/core/flow_dissector.c:1104 __skb_flow_dissect+0x134f/\n[...]\n[69133.561944] CPU: 0 PID: 43576 Comm: socat Not tainted 6.10.0-rc7+ #379\n[69133.561959] RIP: 0010:__skb_flow_dissect+0x134f/0x2ad0\n[69133.561970] Code: 83 f9 04 0f 84 b3 00 00 00 45 85 c9 0f 84 aa 00 00 00 41 83 f9 02 0f 84 81 fc ff\nff 44 0f b7 b4 24 80 00 00 00 e9 8b f9 ff ff \u003c0f\u003e 0b e9 20 f3 ff ff 41 f6 c6 20 0f 84 e4 ef ff ff 48 8d 7b 12 e8\n[69133.561979] RSP: 0018:ffffc90000006fc0 EFLAGS: 00010246\n[69133.561988] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffff82f33e20 RCX: ffffffff81ab7e19\n[69133.561994] RDX: dffffc0000000000 RSI: ffffc90000007388 RDI: ffff888103a1b418\n[69133.562001] RBP: ffffc90000007310 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000\n[69133.562007] R10: ffffc90000007388 R11: ffffffff810cface R12: ffff888103a1b400\n[69133.562013] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffffffff82f33e2a R15: ffffffff82f33e28\n[69133.562020] FS: 00007f40f7131740(0000) GS:ffff888390800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n[69133.562027] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n[69133.562033] CR2: 00007f40f7346ee0 CR3: 000000015d200001 CR4: 00000000001706f0\n[69133.562040] Call Trace:\n[69133.562044] \u003cIRQ\u003e\n[69133.562049] ? __warn+0x9f/0x1a0\n[ 1211.841384] ? __skb_flow_dissect+0x107e/0x2860\n[...]\n[ 1211.841496] ? bpf_flow_dissect+0x160/0x160\n[ 1211.841753] __skb_get_hash+0x97/0x280\n[ 1211.841765] ? __skb_get_hash_symmetric+0x230/0x230\n[ 1211.841776] ? mod_find+0xbf/0xe0\n[ 1211.841786] ? get_stack_info_noinstr+0x12/0xe0\n[ 1211.841798] ? bpf_ksym_find+0x56/0xe0\n[ 1211.841807] ? __rcu_read_unlock+0x2a/0x70\n[ 1211.841819] nft_trace_init+0x1b9/0x1c0 [nf_tables]\n[ 1211.841895] ? nft_trace_notify+0x830/0x830 [nf_tables]\n[ 1211.841964] ? get_stack_info+0x2b/0x80\n[ 1211.841975] ? nft_do_chain_arp+0x80/0x80 [nf_tables]\n[ 1211.842044] nft_do_chain+0x79c/0x850 [nf_tables]"
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-12-19T09:16:21.376Z",
"orgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"shortName": "Linux"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/eb03d9826aa646577342a952d658d4598381c035"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4afbac11f2f629d1e62817c4e210bdfaa7521107"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c5d21aabf1b31a79f228508af33aee83456bc1b0"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/120f1c857a73e52132e473dee89b340440cb692b"
}
],
"title": "net: flow_dissector: use DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "bippy-5f407fcff5a0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"assignerShortName": "Linux",
"cveId": "CVE-2024-42321",
"datePublished": "2024-08-17T09:09:33.505Z",
"dateReserved": "2024-07-30T07:40:12.279Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-12-19T09:16:21.376Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1"
}
}
}
CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2026-03-19 - Updated: 2026-03-19
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits VMware. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un problème de sécurité non spécifié par l'éditeur.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
| Vendor | Product | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VMware | N/A | NodeJS Buildpack versions antérieures à 1.8.82 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Platform | Tanzu for MySQL sur Tanzu Platform versions antérieures à 10.1.1 | ||
| VMware | N/A | Java Buildpack versions antérieures à 4.90.0 | ||
| VMware | N/A | NGINX Buildpack versions antérieures à 1.2.71 | ||
| VMware | N/A | HWC Buildpack versions antérieures à 3.1.91 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Platform | Foundation Core for VMware Tanzu Platform versions antérieures à 3.1.9 |
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "NodeJS Buildpack versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 1.8.82",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Tanzu for MySQL sur Tanzu Platform versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 10.1.1",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Platform",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Java Buildpack versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 4.90.0",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "NGINX Buildpack versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 1.2.71",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "HWC Buildpack versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.1.91",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Foundation Core for VMware Tanzu Platform versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.1.9",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Platform",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2026-28422",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-28422"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-26007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-26007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-3640",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3640"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27435",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27435"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40273",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40273"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53714",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53714"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42122",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42122"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68230",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68230"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-28420",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-28420"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-27943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-27943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41031",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41031"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69534",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69534"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61730",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61730"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49543",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49543"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23202",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23202"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38485",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38485"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53562",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53562"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68324",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68324"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54149",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54149"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-33875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-33875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42155",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42155"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23167",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23167"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36353",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36353"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68196",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68196"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-58183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50550",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50550"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-0400",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0400"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49138",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49138"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66199",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66199"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42239",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42239"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49359",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49359"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68342",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68342"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50425",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50425"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39293",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39293"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38669",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38669"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40137",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40137"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54052",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54052"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38306",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38306"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53733",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53733"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21682",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21682"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1386",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1386"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39298",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39298"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56703",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56703"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53347",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53347"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-28374",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28374"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-32597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-32597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41050",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41050"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-25500",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-25500"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26656",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26656"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38520",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38520"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-27558",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27558"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-21637",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-21637"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42147",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42147"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53529",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53529"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50028",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50028"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50527",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50527"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54280",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54280"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-11187",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-11187"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-52534",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-52534"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40314",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40314"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50407",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50407"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23196",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23196"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26595",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26595"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-23825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-23825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40306",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40306"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23126",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23126"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38329",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38329"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-33096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50230",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50230"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53588",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53588"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-5222",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5222"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23155",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23155"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23054",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23054"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40254",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40254"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49533",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49533"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42253",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42253"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-26557",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26557"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-33114",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33114"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69645",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69645"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68200",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68200"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49518",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49518"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38501",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38501"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-27516",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27516"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68736",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68736"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52561",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52561"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68725",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68725"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53221",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53221"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47432",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47432"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68204",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68204"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53362",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53362"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68349",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68349"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38036",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38036"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-2668",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-2668"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71221",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71221"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39716",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39716"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8277",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8277"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-38457",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-38457"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56665",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56665"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38340",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38340"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38109",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38109"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68283",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68283"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-7216",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-7216"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36427",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36427"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-15469",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15469"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39761",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39761"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38608",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38608"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68246",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68246"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68339",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68339"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53320",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53320"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21656",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21656"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69650",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69650"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50554",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50554"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53509",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53509"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53421",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53421"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-11731",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11731"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-52005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38207",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38207"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49465",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49465"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39720",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39720"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54271",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54271"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71191",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71191"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68295",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68295"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68728",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68728"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68364",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68364"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40100",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40100"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-1965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-1965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-52560",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52560"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56604",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56604"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23227"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-37920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-37920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52653",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52653"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40285",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40285"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52508",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52508"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69647",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69647"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49108",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49108"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56677",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56677"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38717",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38717"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-3497",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-3497"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40208",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40208"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-2219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40039",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40039"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38208",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38208"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27389",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27389"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50627",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50627"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50285",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50285"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38524",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38524"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38029",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38029"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49123",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49123"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50289",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50289"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53258",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53258"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38594",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38594"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-47907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47658",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47658"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-41409",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-41409"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-48873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-48873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53429",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53429"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46765",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46765"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50380",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50380"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38039",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38039"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-24864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36479",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36479"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38595",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38595"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53765",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53765"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38626",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38626"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40356",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40356"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-1642",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-1642"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-45582",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-45582"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53325",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53325"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-27138",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27138"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40312",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40312"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-6293",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-6293"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39282",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39282"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21738",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21738"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-50868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-50868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68302",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68302"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50146",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50146"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56709",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56709"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68297",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68297"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68175",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68175"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-3817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54227"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-46316",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-46316"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49476",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49476"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23208",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23208"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68769",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68769"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40139",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40139"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21768",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21768"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48667",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48667"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69419",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69419"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56744",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56744"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38491",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38491"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-3783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-3783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-21240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-21240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27400",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27400"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52485",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52485"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40309",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40309"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49469",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49469"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38408",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38408"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23179",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23179"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68334",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68334"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40343",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40343"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38644",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38644"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-0480",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0480"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68173",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68173"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53209",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53209"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54253",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54253"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1272",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1272"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21658",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21658"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49651",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49651"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68307",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68307"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40308",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40308"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54324",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54324"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-3195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-3195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56326",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56326"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-26242",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-26242"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-58185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40315",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40315"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56722",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56722"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-33113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48668",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48668"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27418",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27418"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-22930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38591",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38591"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50322",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50322"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-50782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-50782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-27635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-27635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-12317",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-12317"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61731",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61731"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40251",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40251"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42128",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42128"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40355",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40355"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-42771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-42771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-4095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40054",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40054"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36357",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36357"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-11234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23061",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23061"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53447",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53447"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-1121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-1121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49547",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49547"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49484",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49484"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50164",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50164"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-27137",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27137"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53248",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53248"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2016-8660",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-8660"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26691",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26691"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-1975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-1975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38215",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38215"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-7519",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-7519"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53491",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53491"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68365",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68365"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68265",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68265"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50048",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50048"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-28421",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-28421"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-27171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-4133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38734",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38734"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53366",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53366"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49203",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49203"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35839",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35839"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68344",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68344"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23137",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23137"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40347",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40347"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46762",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46762"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-34983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-34983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53323",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53323"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-3731",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-3731"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0760",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0760"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68310",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68310"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23222",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23222"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68257",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68257"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23226",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23226"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-26146",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26146"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52590",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52590"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-22025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-22025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40190",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40190"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69652",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69652"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-40133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-40133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-26143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21712",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21712"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38353",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38353"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-0154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-0154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52761",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52761"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53609",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53609"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53478",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53478"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42117",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42117"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53682",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53682"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40311",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40311"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-54770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-54770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-3442",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-3442"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-13176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-13176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22039",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22039"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-47908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49722",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49722"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-15467",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15467"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-35501",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-35501"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58251",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58251"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38710",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38710"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9820",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9820"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52624",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52624"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56557",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56557"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49699",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49699"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50700",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50700"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52632",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52632"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38556",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38556"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-55130",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-55130"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46820",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46820"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37744",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37744"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53846",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53846"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-1247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40333",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40333"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58054",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58054"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39750",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39750"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38562",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38562"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-4969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35946",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35946"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-44487",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-44487"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5363",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5363"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36428",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36428"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53520",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53520"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52737",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52737"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40360",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40360"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23209",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23209"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71136",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71136"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-8612",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-8612"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40332",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40332"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-46195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-33110",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33110"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-19378",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-19378"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23150",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23150"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71073",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71073"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38426",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38426"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38436",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38436"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-55131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-55131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-31615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-31615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-1737",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-1737"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-25837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-25837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68258",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68258"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38239",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38239"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52831",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52831"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53221",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53221"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26719",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26719"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-44034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-44034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-40897",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-40897"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-37341",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-37341"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69648",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69648"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0466",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0466"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50298",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50298"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36424",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36424"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38590",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38590"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21792",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21792"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36387",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36387"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38709",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38709"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58018",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58018"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-4408",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4408"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71235",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71235"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40322",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40322"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0465",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0465"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46715",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46715"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38038",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38038"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39859",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39859"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40313",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40313"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52582",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52582"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-33053",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-33053"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1152",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1152"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-24051",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24051"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38449",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38449"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21714",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21714"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69644",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69644"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49303",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49303"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38126",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38126"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-46809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-46809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-59465",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59465"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42320",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42320"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40271",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40271"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-11961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3114",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3114"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22991",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22991"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50628",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50628"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56718",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56718"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43824",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43824"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50350",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50350"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21831",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21831"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50721",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50721"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40073",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40073"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-3196",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-3196"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68308",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68308"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50479",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50479"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50583",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50583"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38554",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38554"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40242",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40242"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42110",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42110"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37820",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37820"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53179",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53179"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54233",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54233"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-15213",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-15213"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-44532",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-44532"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49534",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49534"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68190",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68190"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57888",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57888"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53424",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53424"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23207",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23207"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40252",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40252"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49134",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49134"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21946",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21946"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49333",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49333"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-53859",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53859"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-19814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-19814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49136",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49136"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68255",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68255"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-47910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36898",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36898"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68322",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68322"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23138",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23138"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-26551",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-26551"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53210",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53210"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49342",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49342"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-8553",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-8553"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40277",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40277"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38250",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38250"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53332",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53332"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49471",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49471"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68174",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68174"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21751",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21751"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53753",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53753"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40272",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40272"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50106",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50106"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23162",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23162"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-13694",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-13694"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71102",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71102"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23212",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23212"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2013-7445",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2013-7445"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23170",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23170"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52701",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52701"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26647",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26647"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23204",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23204"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49317",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49317"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-12928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-12928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-38552",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-38552"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56607",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56607"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40345",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40345"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-27142",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27142"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53671",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53671"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-28417",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-28417"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-29942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-29942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-0966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-0966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48633",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48633"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38557",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38557"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53584",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53584"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68733",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68733"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56719",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56719"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50418",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50418"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53438",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53438"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-47906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53460",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53460"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23214",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23214"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-52559",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52559"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40269",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40269"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56671",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56671"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68335",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68335"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-62626",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-62626"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52751",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52751"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49562",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49562"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53483",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53483"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-38076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-38076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38368",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38368"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-59375",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59375"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-31133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-31133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56368",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56368"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49172",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49172"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38331",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38331"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68330",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68330"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23228",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23228"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-44033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-44033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49750",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49750"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53707",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53707"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53115",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53115"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71196",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71196"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21645",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21645"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48646",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48646"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-50181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-50181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53370",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53370"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53187",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53187"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-45929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68343",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68343"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66382",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66382"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-33115",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33115"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-26559",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26559"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-12705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-12705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69421",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69421"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-26140",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26140"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39508",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39508"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23191",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23191"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-32249",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-32249"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40362",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40362"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43831",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43831"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-30630",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-30630"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40289",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40289"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23169",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23169"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38330",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38330"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-58188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-13693",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-13693"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68768",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68768"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49306",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49306"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49898",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49898"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36423",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36423"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50211",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50211"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38507",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38507"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22028",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22028"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53218",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53218"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-25836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-25836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-4674",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4674"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-29934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-29934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71147",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71147"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38438",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38438"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-26555",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-26555"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50073",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50073"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68724",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68724"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-5278",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5278"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50393",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50393"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56433",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56433"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-48514",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-48514"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71199",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71199"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47664",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47664"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-25749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-25749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49504",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49504"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0464",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0464"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53367",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53367"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50500",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50500"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-14899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-29526",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-29526"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68797",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68797"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49968",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49968"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68358",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68358"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40206",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40206"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0164",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0164"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-22195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-22195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-23931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-23931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40257",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40257"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49173",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49173"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50551",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50551"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-26269",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-26269"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71108",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71108"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49401",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49401"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68312",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68312"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-14027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-14027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38269",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38269"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69649",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69649"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53175",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53175"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21734",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21734"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49859",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49859"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40336",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40336"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49766",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49766"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-6141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22043",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22043"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49569",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49569"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52569",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52569"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56609",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56609"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38422",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38422"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56611",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56611"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-25743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-25743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50167",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50167"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-27704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-45896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40263",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40263"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40353",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40353"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40222",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40222"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50634",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50634"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-52881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-52881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-54514",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-54514"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71202",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71202"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-7837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-7837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0677",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0677"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50492",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50492"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49888",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49888"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50406",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50406"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-26552",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-26552"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-5535",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-5535"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23108",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23108"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-59691",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59691"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52481",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52481"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52888",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52888"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47666",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47666"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40278",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40278"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-1788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-1788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53721",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53721"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40342",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40342"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50256",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50256"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38625",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38625"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-4010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38425",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38425"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54028",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54028"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-17977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-17977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-1010204",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-1010204"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-26960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-26960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40210",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40210"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61724",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61724"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21812",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21812"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-12801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-12801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68765",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68765"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52589",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52589"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-41848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-41848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23216",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23216"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53434",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53434"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-29935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-29935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-35061",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-35061"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71132",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71132"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71225",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71225"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-21636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-21636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23239",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23239"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0172",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0172"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-12930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-12930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41067",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41067"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-32644",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-32644"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46681",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46681"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61723",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61723"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40279",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40279"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-0964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-0964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68328",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68328"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-8354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-8354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54323",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54323"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-45803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0689",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0689"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50316",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50316"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-31347",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-31347"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53657",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53657"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-55132",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-55132"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23073",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23073"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49167",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49167"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68311",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68311"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-27903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54023",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54023"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-31082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-31082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0690",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0690"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71114",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71114"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53052",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53052"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50163",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50163"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71067",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71067"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71182",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71182"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-26556",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26556"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-46394",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-46394"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66471",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66471"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23038",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23038"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40341",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40341"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38409",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38409"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26699",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26699"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-25679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-25679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-14017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50390",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50390"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-21441",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-21441"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45337",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45337"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71186",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71186"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53539",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53539"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40338",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40338"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68821",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68821"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-31648",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-31648"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-1229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-1229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56674",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56674"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-31884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-31884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-1563",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-1563"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23128",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23128"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53574",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53574"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50166",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50166"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61725",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61725"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68325",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68325"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71190",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71190"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56738",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56738"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42067",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42067"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21693",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21693"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71203",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71203"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56657",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56657"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52700",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52700"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56583",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56583"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40358",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40358"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56712",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56712"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68318",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68318"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52634",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52634"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-62526",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-62526"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-55163",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-55163"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45776",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45776"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40340",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40340"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68332",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68332"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-14356",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-14356"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54263",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54263"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53687",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53687"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40283",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40283"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-5918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38628",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38628"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40324",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40324"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38672",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38672"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0684",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0684"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-10158",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-10158"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68378",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68378"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23146",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23146"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38272",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38272"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-10524",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-10524"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40146",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40146"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38359",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38359"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-20794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-20794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-4543",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-4543"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23037",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23037"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53627",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53627"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40250",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40250"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53510",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53510"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38334",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38334"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53575",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53575"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49516",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49516"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38728",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38728"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3523",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3523"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-26157",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-26157"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-38417",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-38417"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68367",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68367"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68820",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68820"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-45261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-45261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47736",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47736"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53037",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53037"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-13462",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13462"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69646",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69646"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54207",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54207"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23215",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23215"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-28956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-28956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-26142",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26142"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53628",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53628"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-29943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-29943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-31346",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-31346"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-9143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-9143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40158",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40158"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38140",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38140"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38621",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38621"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-24842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40282",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40282"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-34034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-34034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-59692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50116",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50116"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-12931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-12931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37856",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37856"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22874",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22874"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-13791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-13791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-15802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-15802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-24240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-24240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46718",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46718"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41045",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41045"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53545",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53545"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50552",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50552"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38333",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38333"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53376",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53376"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53538",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53538"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68192",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68192"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-5569",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-5569"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68379",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68379"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50357",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50357"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68256",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68256"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52671",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52671"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50303",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50303"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68254",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68254"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23221",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23221"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40196",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40196"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52676",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52676"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38117",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38117"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-13165",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-13165"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38556",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38556"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47683",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47683"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22109",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22109"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38300",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38300"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23132",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23132"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49531",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49531"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49504",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49504"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1376",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1376"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-47912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71109",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71109"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-26586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-26586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38373",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38373"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38369",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38369"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-43804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-43804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50332",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50332"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27408",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27408"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71222",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71222"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50461",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50461"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-26554",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-26554"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38486",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38486"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-26934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-26934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53466",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53466"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49528",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49528"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-45888",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-45888"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49218",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49218"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68327",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68327"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-2236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-2236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49245",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49245"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52682",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52682"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71150",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71150"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23213",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23213"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-8956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-8956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40266",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40266"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68241",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68241"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49420",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49420"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-40964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-40964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-3441",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-3441"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53149",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53149"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-60753",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-60753"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-52565",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-52565"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38259",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38259"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71192",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71192"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53596",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53596"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50260",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50260"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40135",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40135"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-12319",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-12319"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-50495",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-50495"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49568",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49568"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21750",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21750"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-11164",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-11164"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-3397",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3397"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68734",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68734"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26672",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26672"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68776",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68776"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61728",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61728"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-0965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-0965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-33139",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33139"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-58186",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58186"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38192",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38192"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68345",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68345"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38343",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38343"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-26158",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-26158"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38202",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38202"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53547",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53547"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-20426",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-20426"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40310",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40310"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-29786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-29786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-58187",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58187"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56584",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56584"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23235",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23235"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-4899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-4899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71152",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71152"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42139",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42139"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53196",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53196"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38665",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38665"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50212",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50212"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54259",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54259"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54067",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54067"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1369",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1369"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68317",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68317"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40331",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40331"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-4673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53241",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53241"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-34969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-34969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-33155",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33155"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68337",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68337"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50187",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50187"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50464",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50464"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38674",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38674"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-26560",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26560"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26714",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26714"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-54771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-54771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0564",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0564"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69651",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69651"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38552",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38552"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40335",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40335"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40149",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40149"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-28667",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-28667"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53383",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53383"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46717",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46717"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-25743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40164",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40164"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-10911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-10911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23164",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23164"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41036",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41036"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53751",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53751"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42319",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42319"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-13716",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-13716"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-22018",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-22018"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71116",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71116"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-40735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-40735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36024",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36024"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21723",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21723"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54190",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54190"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68281",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68281"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38440",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38440"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68362",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68362"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-14524",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14524"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68333",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68333"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47689",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47689"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52625",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52625"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53353",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53353"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38225",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38225"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53401",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53401"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22037",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22037"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68290",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68290"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40280",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40280"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71162",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71162"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0170",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0170"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50571",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50571"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-31879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-31879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49393",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49393"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-6119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71204",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71204"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68331",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68331"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-29217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-29217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26758",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26758"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-32651",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-32651"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-2297",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2297"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53036",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53036"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-58181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71115",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71115"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50166",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50166"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53355",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53355"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-25265",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-25265"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-0967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-0967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53558",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53558"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-47914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68214",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68214"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38703",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38703"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36365",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36365"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9403",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9403"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1255",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1255"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56641",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56641"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0686",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0686"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39753",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39753"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69418",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69418"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23182",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23182"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0173",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0173"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54285",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54285"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47661",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47661"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-28418",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-28418"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54151",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54151"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22869",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22869"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-59466",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59466"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40192",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40192"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38544",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38544"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39797",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39797"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-36351",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-36351"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-15468",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15468"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36478",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36478"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-1299",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-1299"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-54683",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-54683"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1150",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1150"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46720",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46720"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26658",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26658"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-2243",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2243"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-58189",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58189"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-36087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-36087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38564",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38564"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0174",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0174"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36442",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36442"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40102",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40102"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-0968",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-0968"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40170",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40170"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38437",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38437"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-7008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-7008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-4603",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-4603"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50213",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50213"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-32642",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-32642"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71227"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46733",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46733"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-7883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-7883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50271",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50271"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56717",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56717"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68366",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68366"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56707",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56707"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-45885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-45885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40305",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40305"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2016-2781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-2781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-29383",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-29383"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-47153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53216",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53216"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49539",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49539"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36347",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36347"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26869",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26869"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-20255",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-20255"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40307",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40307"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68346",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68346"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71163",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71163"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36350",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36350"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-25951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-25951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40211",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40211"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53152",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53152"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0308",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0308"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68315",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68315"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39850",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39850"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-1205",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1205"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-45927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-25742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-25742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-0987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38199",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38199"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50720",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50720"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-50387",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-50387"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49529",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49529"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68266",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68266"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68363",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68363"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-54456",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-54456"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40248",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40248"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52657",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52657"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36331",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36331"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-27571",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27571"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-27139",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27139"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-25741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-25741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21667",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21667"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9230",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9230"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-49083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-49083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21696",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21696"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68303",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68303"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40259",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40259"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-28419",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-28419"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8677",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8677"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38560",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38560"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53385",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53385"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23206",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23206"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53620",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53620"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50539",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50539"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23130",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23130"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49496",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49496"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38349",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38349"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1352",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1352"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53540",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53540"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49552",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49552"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-4741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-4741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39726",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39726"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54187",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54187"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-44032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-44032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57895",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57895"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-13735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53694",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53694"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38716",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38716"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-11187",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11187"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56660",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56660"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41023",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41023"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21672",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21672"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-15079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36366",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36366"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36123",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36123"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56737",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56737"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21821",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21821"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68206",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68206"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-11935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-11935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68309",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68309"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71158",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71158"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57898",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57898"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-35503",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-35503"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56639",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56639"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68372",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68372"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-3651",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-3651"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-26996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-26996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21651",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21651"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68313",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68313"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58053",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58053"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-26553",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-26553"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-60876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-60876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37776",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37776"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-23840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-23840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-6519",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6519"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46729",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46729"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53850",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53850"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50266",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50266"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71137",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71137"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-11065",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11065"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23190",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23190"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40123",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40123"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49991",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49991"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-26047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-26047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-2193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-2193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-4382",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4382"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-28693",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-28693"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39706",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39706"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22038",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22038"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54242",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54242"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68289",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68289"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40363",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40363"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40253",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40253"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61726",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61726"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50518",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50518"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-64756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-64756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2016-2568",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-2568"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-13817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-13817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68245",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68245"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-12929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-12929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53147",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53147"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40317",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40317"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23110",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23110"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53410",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53410"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53254",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53254"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-34064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-47210",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-47210"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0165",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0165"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0624",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0624"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49177",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49177"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38205",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38205"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23100",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23100"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-59464",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59464"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58241",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58241"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38166",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38166"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68282",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68282"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38045",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38045"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46726",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46726"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53647",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53647"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-12313",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-12313"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71233",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71233"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0166",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0166"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39744",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39744"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71197",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71197"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68177",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68177"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68758",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68758"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47728",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47728"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68191",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68191"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23031",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23031"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46730",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46730"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46728",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46728"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53561",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53561"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54172",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54172"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23050",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23050"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58100",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58100"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-0256",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-0256"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21634",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21634"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47738",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47738"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68340",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68340"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54320",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54320"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-0537",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-0537"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38191",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38191"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-32681",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-32681"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38531",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38531"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-26112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-26112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-6952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-6952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-14304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-14304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68239",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68239"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40258",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40258"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40281",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40281"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38503",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38503"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40110",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40110"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-24001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-29481",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-29481"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40268",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40268"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61661",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61661"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-25740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50246",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50246"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-3446",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3446"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40325",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40325"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-2511",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-2511"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1151",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1151"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68798",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68798"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42273",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42273"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68336",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68336"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23157",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23157"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40303",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40303"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40337",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40337"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-20633",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-20633"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3714",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3714"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56566",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56566"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40036",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40036"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57993",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57993"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53190",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53190"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40262",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40262"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35784",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35784"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56591",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56591"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56544",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56544"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56647",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56647"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21649",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21649"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57893",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57893"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-39333",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39333"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38643",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38643"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52591",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52591"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26648",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26648"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-11868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-11868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-24352",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-24352"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38360",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38360"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39715",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39715"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36407",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36407"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40323",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40323"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47658",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47658"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68285",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68285"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-12067",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-12067"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38512",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38512"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50135",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50135"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52648",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52648"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49893",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49893"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53348",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53348"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48766",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48766"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-15794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-15794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50467",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50467"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-48875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-48875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38162",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38162"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-23491",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-23491"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53382",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53382"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39677",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39677"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53651",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53651"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68371",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68371"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50383",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50383"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39707",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39707"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40275",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40275"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53387",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53387"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22053",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22053"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61664",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61664"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68211",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68211"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-25702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-25702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52452",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52452"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-42366",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-42366"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39762",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39762"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53292",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53292"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52576",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52576"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0167",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0167"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21730",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21730"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52660",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52660"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69420",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69420"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53371",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53371"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68227"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40339",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40339"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-47273",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47273"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-15224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26605",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26605"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-27904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38543",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38543"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68263",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68263"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53187",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53187"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38689",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38689"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38275",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38275"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48744",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48744"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68755",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68755"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-62525",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-62525"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0175",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0175"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48706",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48706"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40334",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40334"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46716",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46716"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2012-4542",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2012-4542"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61729",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61729"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49267",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49267"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56592",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56592"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38189",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38189"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48628",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48628"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-6345",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6345"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50138",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50138"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40319",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40319"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-44534",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-44534"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-14831",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14831"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56565",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56565"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-28720",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28720"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47703",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47703"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38361",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38361"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53177",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53177"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56588",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56588"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53452",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53452"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6610",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6610"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50616",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50616"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66418",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66418"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53544",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53544"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50708",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50708"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-3784",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-3784"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9301"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2026-03-19T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2026-03-19T00:00:00",
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2026-AVI-0316",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2026-03-19T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans les produits VMware. Elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer un probl\u00e8me de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans les produits VMware",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2026-03-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37219",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37219"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37211",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37211"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37215",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37215"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37218",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37218"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37220",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37220"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37216",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37216"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37221",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37221"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37213",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37213"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37217",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37217"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37212",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37212"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37214",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37214"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-18",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37222",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37222"
}
]
}
CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2026-03-20 - Updated: 2026-03-20
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits VMware. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un problème de sécurité non spécifié par l'éditeur.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
| Vendor | Product | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VMware | Tanzu Platform | Isolation Segmentation pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions antérieures à 6.0.26+LTS-T | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Platform | Isolation Segmentation pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions antérieures à 10.3.6 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Platform | App Autoscaler CLI Plugin pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions antérieures à 250.6.9 | ||
| VMware | N/A | Python Buildpack versions antérieures à 1.8.83 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Platform | Tanzu Platform versions antérieures à 3.1.9 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Platform | Tanzu RabbitMQ sur Tanzu Platform versions antérieures à 2.4.4 | ||
| VMware | N/A | PHP Buildpack versions antérieures à 4.6.69 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Platform | Tanzu Platform versions antérieures à 3.2.5 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Platform | Elastic Application Runtime Windows add-on pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions antérieures à 10.2.9+LTS-T | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Platform | App Autoscaler CLI Plugin pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions antérieures à 250.5.17 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Platform | Tanzu RabbitMQ pour Tanzu Platform versions antérieures à 10.1.2 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Platform | Tanzu Platform versions antérieures à 2.4.6 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Platform | Tanzu Platform versions antérieures à 1.16.18 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Platform | Tanzu for Valkey sur Tanzu Platform versions antérieures à 10.2.2 | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Platform | Elastic Application Runtime Windows add-on pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions antérieures à 6.0.26+LTS-T | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Platform | Isolation Segmentation pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions antérieures à 10.2.9+LTS-T | ||
| VMware | Tanzu Platform | Elastic Application Runtime Windows add-on pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions antérieures à 10.3.6 |
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "Isolation Segmentation pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 6.0.26+LTS-T",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Platform",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Isolation Segmentation pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 10.3.6",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Platform",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "App Autoscaler CLI Plugin pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 250.6.9",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Platform",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Python Buildpack versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 1.8.83",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Tanzu Platform versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.1.9",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Platform",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Tanzu RabbitMQ sur Tanzu Platform versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 2.4.4",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Platform",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "PHP Buildpack versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 4.6.69",
"product": {
"name": "N/A",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Tanzu Platform versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 3.2.5",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Platform",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Elastic Application Runtime Windows add-on pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 10.2.9+LTS-T",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Platform",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "App Autoscaler CLI Plugin pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 250.5.17",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Platform",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Tanzu RabbitMQ pour Tanzu Platform versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 10.1.2",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Platform",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Tanzu Platform versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 2.4.6",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Platform",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Tanzu Platform versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 1.16.18",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Platform",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Tanzu for Valkey sur Tanzu Platform versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 10.2.2",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Platform",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Elastic Application Runtime Windows add-on pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 6.0.26+LTS-T",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Platform",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Isolation Segmentation pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 10.2.9+LTS-T",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Platform",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Elastic Application Runtime Windows add-on pour VMware Tanzu Platform versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 10.3.6",
"product": {
"name": "Tanzu Platform",
"vendor": {
"name": "VMware",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2026-28422",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-28422"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-26007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-26007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-3640",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3640"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27435",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27435"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40273",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40273"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53714",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53714"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42122",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42122"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68230",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68230"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-28420",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-28420"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-27943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-27943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41031",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41031"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69534",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69534"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61730",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61730"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49543",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49543"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23202",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23202"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38485",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38485"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53562",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53562"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68324",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68324"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54149",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54149"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-33875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-33875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42155",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42155"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23167",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23167"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36353",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36353"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68196",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68196"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-58183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-59830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50550",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50550"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-0400",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0400"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49138",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49138"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66199",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66199"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42239",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42239"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49359",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49359"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68342",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68342"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50425",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50425"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39293",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39293"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38669",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38669"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40137",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40137"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54052",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54052"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38306",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38306"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53733",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53733"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21682",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21682"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1386",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1386"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39298",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39298"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56703",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56703"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53347",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53347"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-28374",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28374"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-32597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-32597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41050",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41050"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-25500",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-25500"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26656",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26656"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38520",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38520"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-27558",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27558"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-21637",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-21637"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42147",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42147"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53529",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53529"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50028",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50028"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50527",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50527"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54280",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54280"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-11187",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-11187"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-52534",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-52534"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40314",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40314"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50407",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50407"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23196",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23196"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26595",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26595"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-23825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-23825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40306",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40306"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23126",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23126"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38329",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38329"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-33096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50230",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50230"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53588",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53588"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-5222",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5222"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23155",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23155"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23054",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23054"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40254",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40254"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49533",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49533"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42253",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42253"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-26557",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26557"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-33114",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33114"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69645",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69645"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68200",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68200"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49518",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49518"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38501",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38501"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-27516",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27516"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68736",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68736"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52561",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52561"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68725",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68725"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-3220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-3220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53221",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53221"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47432",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47432"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-24734",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24734"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68204",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68204"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53362",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53362"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68349",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68349"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38036",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38036"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-2668",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-2668"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71221",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71221"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39716",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39716"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8277",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8277"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-38457",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-38457"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56665",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56665"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38340",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38340"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38109",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38109"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68283",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68283"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-7216",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-7216"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66614",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66614"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36427",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36427"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-15469",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15469"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39761",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39761"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38608",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38608"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68246",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68246"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68339",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68339"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53320",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53320"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21656",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21656"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69650",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69650"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50554",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50554"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53509",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53509"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53421",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53421"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-11731",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11731"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-52005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46775",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46775"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38207",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38207"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49465",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49465"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39720",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39720"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54271",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54271"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71191",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71191"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68295",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68295"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68728",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68728"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68364",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68364"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40100",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40100"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-1965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-1965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-52560",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52560"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56604",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56604"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23227"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-37920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-37920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52653",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52653"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40285",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40285"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52508",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52508"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69647",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69647"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49108",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49108"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56677",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56677"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38717",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38717"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-3497",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-3497"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40208",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40208"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-2219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40039",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40039"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38208",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38208"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27389",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27389"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50627",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50627"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50285",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50285"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38524",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38524"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38029",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38029"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49123",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49123"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50289",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50289"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53258",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53258"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38594",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38594"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-47907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47658",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47658"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-41409",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-41409"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-48873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-48873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-12797",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-12797"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53429",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53429"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46765",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46765"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50380",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50380"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-12084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-12084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38039",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38039"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-24864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-24864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36479",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36479"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38595",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38595"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53765",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53765"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38626",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38626"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40356",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40356"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-1642",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-1642"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-45582",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-45582"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53325",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53325"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-27138",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27138"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40312",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40312"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-6293",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-6293"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39282",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39282"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21738",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21738"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-50868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-50868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68302",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68302"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50146",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50146"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56709",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56709"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68297",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68297"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68175",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68175"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-6069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-3817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54227"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-46316",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-46316"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49476",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49476"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23208",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23208"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68769",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68769"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40139",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40139"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21768",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21768"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48667",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48667"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69419",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69419"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56744",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56744"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38491",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38491"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-3783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-3783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-21240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-21240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27400",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27400"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52485",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52485"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40309",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40309"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49469",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49469"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-6075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38408",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38408"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23179",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23179"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68334",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68334"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40343",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40343"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38644",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38644"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-0480",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0480"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68173",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68173"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53209",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53209"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54253",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54253"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1272",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1272"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21658",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21658"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49651",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49651"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68307",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68307"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40308",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40308"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54324",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54324"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-3195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-3195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56326",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56326"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-26242",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-26242"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-58185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40315",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40315"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56722",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56722"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-33113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48668",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48668"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27418",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27418"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-22930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-22930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-14177",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14177"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38591",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38591"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50322",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50322"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-50782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-50782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-27635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-27635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-12317",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-12317"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61731",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61731"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40251",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40251"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42128",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42128"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40355",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40355"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-42771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-42771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-2391",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2391"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-4095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40054",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40054"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36357",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36357"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-11234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23061",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23061"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53447",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53447"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-1121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-1121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49547",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49547"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49484",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49484"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50164",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50164"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-27137",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27137"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53248",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53248"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2016-8660",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-8660"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26691",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26691"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-1975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-1975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38215",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38215"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-7519",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-7519"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53491",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53491"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68365",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68365"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68265",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68265"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50048",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50048"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-28421",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-28421"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-27171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-13837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-4133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38734",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38734"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53366",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53366"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49203",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49203"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35839",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35839"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68344",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68344"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23137",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23137"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40347",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40347"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46762",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46762"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-34983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-34983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53323",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53323"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-3731",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-3731"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0760",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0760"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68310",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68310"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23222",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23222"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68257",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68257"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23226",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23226"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-26146",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26146"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52590",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52590"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-22025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-22025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40190",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40190"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69652",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69652"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-40133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-40133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-26143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21712",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21712"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38353",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38353"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-0154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-0154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52761",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52761"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53609",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53609"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53478",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53478"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42117",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42117"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53682",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53682"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40311",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40311"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-54770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-54770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-3442",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-3442"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-13176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-13176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22039",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22039"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49722",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49722"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-15467",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15467"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-35501",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-35501"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58251",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58251"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38710",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38710"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9820",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9820"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52624",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52624"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56557",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56557"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49699",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49699"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50700",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50700"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52632",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52632"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38556",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38556"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-55130",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-55130"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46820",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46820"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37744",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37744"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53846",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53846"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-1247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40333",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40333"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58054",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58054"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39750",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39750"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38562",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38562"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-4969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35946",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35946"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-44487",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-44487"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5363",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5363"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36428",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36428"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53520",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53520"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52737",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52737"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40360",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40360"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23209",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23209"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71136",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71136"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-8612",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-8612"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40332",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40332"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-46195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-33110",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33110"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-19378",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-19378"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23150",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23150"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71073",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71073"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38426",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38426"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38436",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38436"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-55131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-55131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-31615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-31615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-1737",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-1737"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-25837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-25837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68258",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68258"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38239",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38239"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52831",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52831"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53221",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53221"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26719",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26719"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-44034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-44034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-40897",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-40897"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-37341",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-37341"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69648",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69648"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0466",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0466"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50298",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50298"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36424",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36424"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38590",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38590"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21792",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21792"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36387",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36387"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38709",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38709"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58018",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58018"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-4408",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4408"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71235",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71235"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40322",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40322"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0465",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0465"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61770",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61770"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46715",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46715"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38038",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38038"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39859",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39859"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40313",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40313"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52582",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52582"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-33053",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-33053"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1152",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1152"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-24051",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24051"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38449",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38449"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21714",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21714"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69644",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69644"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49303",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49303"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38126",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38126"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-46809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-46809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-59465",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59465"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39763",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39763"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42320",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42320"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40271",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40271"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-11961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3114",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3114"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22991",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22991"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50628",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50628"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56718",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56718"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43824",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43824"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50350",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50350"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21831",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21831"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50721",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50721"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40073",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40073"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-3196",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-3196"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8291",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8291"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68308",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68308"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50479",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50479"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50583",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50583"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38554",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38554"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40242",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40242"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42110",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42110"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37820",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37820"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53179",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53179"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54233",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54233"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-15213",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-15213"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-44532",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-44532"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49534",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49534"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68190",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68190"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57888",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57888"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-65637",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-65637"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53424",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53424"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23207",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23207"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40252",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40252"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49134",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49134"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21946",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21946"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49333",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49333"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-27111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-53859",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53859"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-19814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-19814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49136",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49136"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68255",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68255"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-47910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36898",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36898"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68322",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68322"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23138",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23138"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-1703",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-1703"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-26551",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-26551"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53210",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53210"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49342",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49342"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-8553",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-8553"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40277",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40277"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38250",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38250"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53332",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53332"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49471",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49471"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68174",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68174"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21751",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21751"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53753",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53753"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40272",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40272"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50106",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50106"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23162",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23162"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-46727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-46727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-13694",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-13694"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71102",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71102"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23212",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23212"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2013-7445",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2013-7445"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23170",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23170"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52701",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52701"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26647",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26647"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23204",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23204"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49317",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49317"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-12928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-12928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-38552",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-38552"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56607",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56607"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40345",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40345"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-27142",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27142"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53671",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53671"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-28417",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-28417"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-29942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-29942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-0966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-0966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48633",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48633"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38557",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38557"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53584",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53584"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68733",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68733"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56719",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56719"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50418",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50418"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53438",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53438"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-47906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53460",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53460"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23214",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23214"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-52559",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52559"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40269",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40269"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56671",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56671"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68335",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68335"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-62626",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-62626"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52751",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52751"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49562",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49562"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53483",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53483"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-38076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-38076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38368",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38368"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-59375",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59375"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-31133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-31133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56368",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56368"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49172",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49172"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38331",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38331"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68330",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68330"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23228",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23228"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-44033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-44033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49750",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49750"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53707",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53707"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53115",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53115"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71196",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71196"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21645",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21645"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48646",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48646"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-50181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-50181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61663",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61663"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53370",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53370"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53187",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53187"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-45929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68343",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68343"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66382",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66382"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-33115",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33115"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-26559",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26559"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-12705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-12705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69421",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69421"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-26140",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26140"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39508",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39508"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23191",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23191"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-32249",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-32249"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40362",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40362"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43831",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43831"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-30630",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-30630"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40289",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40289"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23169",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23169"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38330",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38330"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-58188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-13693",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-13693"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68768",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68768"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49306",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49306"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49898",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49898"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36423",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36423"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49622",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49622"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50211",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50211"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38507",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38507"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22028",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22028"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53218",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53218"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-25836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-25836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-4674",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4674"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-29934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-29934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71147",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71147"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38438",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38438"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-26555",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-26555"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50073",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50073"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68724",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68724"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-5278",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5278"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50393",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50393"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56433",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56433"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-48514",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-48514"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71199",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71199"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47664",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47664"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-25749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-25749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49504",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49504"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0464",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0464"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53367",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53367"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50500",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50500"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-14899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-14899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-29526",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-29526"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68797",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68797"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49968",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49968"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68358",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68358"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40206",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40206"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0164",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0164"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-26958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-26958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-22195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-22195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-23931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-23931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40257",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40257"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49173",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49173"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50551",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50551"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-26269",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-26269"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71108",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71108"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49401",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49401"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68312",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68312"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-14027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-14027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38269",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38269"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69649",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69649"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53175",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53175"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21734",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21734"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49859",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49859"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40336",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40336"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49766",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49766"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-6141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22043",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22043"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49569",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49569"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52569",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52569"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56609",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56609"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38422",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38422"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56611",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56611"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-25743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-25743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50167",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50167"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-27704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-45896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40263",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40263"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40353",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40353"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40222",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40222"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50634",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50634"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-52881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-52881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-54514",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-54514"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71202",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71202"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-7837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-7837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0677",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0677"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50492",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50492"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49888",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49888"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50406",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50406"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-26552",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-26552"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-5535",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-5535"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23108",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23108"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-59691",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59691"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52481",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52481"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52888",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52888"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47666",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47666"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40278",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40278"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-0160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-1788",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-1788"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53721",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53721"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40342",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40342"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50256",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50256"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38625",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38625"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-4010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-4010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38425",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38425"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54028",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54028"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-17977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-17977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-1010204",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-1010204"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-26960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-26960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40210",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40210"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61724",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61724"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21812",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21812"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-12801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-12801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68765",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68765"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52589",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52589"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-41848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-41848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23216",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23216"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53434",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53434"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-29935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-29935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-35061",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-35061"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71132",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71132"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71225",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71225"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-21636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-21636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23239",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23239"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0172",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0172"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47662",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47662"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-12930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-12930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41067",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41067"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-32644",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-32644"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46681",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46681"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61723",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61723"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40279",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40279"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-0964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-0964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68328",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68328"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-8354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-8354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54323",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54323"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-45803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0689",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0689"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50316",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50316"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-31347",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-31347"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53657",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53657"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-55132",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-55132"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23073",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23073"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49167",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49167"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68311",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68311"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-27903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54023",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54023"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-31082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-31082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0690",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0690"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71114",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71114"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53052",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53052"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50163",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50163"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71067",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71067"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71182",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71182"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-26556",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26556"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-46394",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-46394"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66471",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66471"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23038",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23038"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40341",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40341"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38409",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38409"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26699",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26699"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-25679",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-25679"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-14017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50390",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50390"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-21441",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-21441"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45337",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45337"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71186",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71186"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53539",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53539"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-13836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40338",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40338"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68821",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68821"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-31648",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-31648"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56674",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56674"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-31884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-31884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-1563",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-1563"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-1002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-1002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23128",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23128"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53574",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53574"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50166",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50166"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61725",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61725"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68325",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68325"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71190",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71190"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56738",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56738"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42067",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42067"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21693",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21693"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71203",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71203"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56657",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56657"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39789",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39789"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52700",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52700"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56583",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56583"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40358",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40358"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56712",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56712"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68318",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68318"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52634",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52634"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-62526",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-62526"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53785",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53785"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45776",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45776"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40340",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40340"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68332",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68332"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-14356",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-14356"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54263",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54263"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53687",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53687"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40283",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40283"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-5918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38628",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38628"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40324",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40324"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38672",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38672"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0684",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0684"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-10158",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-10158"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68378",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68378"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23146",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23146"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38272",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38272"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-10524",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-10524"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40146",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40146"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38359",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38359"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-20794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-20794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-4543",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-4543"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23037",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23037"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53627",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53627"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40250",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40250"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53510",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53510"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38334",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38334"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53575",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53575"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49516",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49516"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38728",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38728"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3523",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3523"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-26157",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-26157"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-38417",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-38417"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68367",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68367"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68820",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68820"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-45261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-45261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47736",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47736"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53037",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53037"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-13462",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13462"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69646",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69646"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54207",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54207"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23215",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23215"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-28956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-28956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-26142",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26142"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53628",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53628"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-29943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-29943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-31346",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-31346"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-9143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-9143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40158",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40158"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38140",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38140"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38621",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38621"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-24842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40282",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40282"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-34034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-34034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-59692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50116",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50116"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-12931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-12931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37856",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37856"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22874",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22874"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-13791",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-13791"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-15802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-15802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-24240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-24240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46718",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46718"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41045",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41045"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53545",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53545"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50552",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50552"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38333",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38333"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53376",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53376"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53538",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53538"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68192",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68192"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-5569",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-5569"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68379",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68379"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50357",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50357"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68256",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68256"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52671",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52671"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50303",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50303"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68254",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68254"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23221",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23221"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40196",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40196"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52676",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52676"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38117",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38117"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-13165",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-13165"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38556",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38556"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47683",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47683"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22109",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22109"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38300",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38300"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23132",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23132"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49531",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49531"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49504",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49504"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1376",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1376"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-47912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71109",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71109"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-26586",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-26586"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38373",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38373"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38369",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38369"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-43804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-43804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50332",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50332"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27408",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27408"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71222",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71222"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50461",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50461"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-26554",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-26554"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38486",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38486"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-26934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-26934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53466",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53466"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49528",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49528"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-45888",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-45888"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49218",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49218"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52749",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52749"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68327",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68327"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-2236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-2236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49245",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49245"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52682",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52682"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71150",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71150"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23213",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23213"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-8956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-8956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40266",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40266"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68241",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68241"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49420",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49420"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-40964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-40964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-3441",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-3441"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53149",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53149"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-60753",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-60753"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-52565",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-52565"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38259",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38259"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71192",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71192"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53596",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53596"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50260",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50260"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40135",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40135"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-67735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-67735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-12319",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-12319"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-50495",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-50495"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49568",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49568"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21750",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21750"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-11164",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-11164"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-3397",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3397"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68734",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68734"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26672",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26672"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68776",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68776"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61728",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61728"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-0965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-0965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-33139",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33139"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-58186",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58186"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38192",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38192"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68345",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68345"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38343",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38343"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-26158",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-26158"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38202",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38202"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53547",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53547"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-20426",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-20426"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40310",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40310"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-29786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-29786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-58187",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58187"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56584",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56584"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23235",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23235"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-4899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-4899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71152",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71152"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42139",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42139"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56692",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56692"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53196",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53196"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38665",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38665"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50212",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50212"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54259",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54259"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54067",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54067"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1369",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1369"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68317",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68317"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40331",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40331"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-4673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49635",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49635"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53241",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53241"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-14180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-34969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-34969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-33155",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33155"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68337",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68337"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50187",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50187"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50464",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50464"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38674",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38674"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-26560",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26560"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26714",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26714"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45777",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45777"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-54771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-54771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0564",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0564"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69651",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69651"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38552",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38552"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40335",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40335"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40149",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40149"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-28667",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-28667"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53383",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53383"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46717",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46717"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-25743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40164",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40164"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-10911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-10911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23164",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23164"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41036",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41036"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53751",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53751"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53743",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53743"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42319",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42319"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-13716",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-13716"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-22018",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-22018"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71116",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71116"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-40735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-40735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36024",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36024"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21723",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21723"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54190",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54190"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68281",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68281"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38440",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38440"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68362",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68362"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-39286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-39286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-25184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-25184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-14524",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14524"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68333",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68333"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47689",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47689"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52625",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52625"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53353",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53353"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38225",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38225"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53401",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53401"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22037",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22037"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68290",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68290"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40280",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40280"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71162",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71162"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0170",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0170"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-10782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-10782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50571",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50571"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-31879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-31879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49393",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49393"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-6119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71204",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71204"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68331",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68331"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-29217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-29217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26758",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26758"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-32651",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-32651"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-2297",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2297"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53036",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53036"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38615",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38615"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-58181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71115",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71115"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50166",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50166"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53355",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53355"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-25265",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-25265"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-0967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-0967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53558",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53558"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-47914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68214",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68214"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38703",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38703"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36365",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36365"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9403",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9403"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-1255",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1255"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56641",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56641"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0686",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0686"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21739",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21739"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39753",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39753"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69418",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69418"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23182",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23182"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0173",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0173"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54285",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54285"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45778",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45778"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47661",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47661"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-28418",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-28418"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54151",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54151"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22869",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22869"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-59466",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59466"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40192",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40192"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38544",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38544"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39797",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39797"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-36351",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-36351"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-15468",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15468"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36478",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36478"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-25639",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-25639"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-1299",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-1299"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-54683",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-54683"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1150",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1150"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46720",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46720"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26658",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26658"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-2243",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2243"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-58189",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-58189"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-36087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-36087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38564",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38564"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0174",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0174"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8746",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8746"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36442",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36442"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40102",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40102"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-0968",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-0968"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40170",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40170"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38437",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38437"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-7008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-7008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45779",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45779"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-4603",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-4603"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50213",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50213"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-32642",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-32642"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71227"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46733",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46733"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-7883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-7883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50271",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50271"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50772",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50772"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56717",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56717"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68366",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68366"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56707",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56707"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-45885",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-45885"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40305",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40305"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2016-2781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-2781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-29383",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-29383"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-47153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53216",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53216"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49539",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49539"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36347",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36347"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26869",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26869"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-20255",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-20255"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40307",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40307"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68346",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68346"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71163",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71163"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36350",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36350"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-25951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-25951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40211",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40211"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53152",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53152"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0308",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0308"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68315",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68315"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39850",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39850"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-1205",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1205"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-45927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-25742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-25742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-0987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-0987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38199",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38199"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50720",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50720"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-50387",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-50387"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49529",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49529"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68266",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68266"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68363",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68363"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-54456",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-54456"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40248",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40248"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52657",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52657"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36331",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36331"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-27571",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27571"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-27139",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27139"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-24733",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24733"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-25741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-25741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50748",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50748"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21667",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21667"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9230",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9230"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-49083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-49083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21696",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21696"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68303",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68303"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40259",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40259"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-28419",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-28419"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8677",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8677"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38560",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38560"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53385",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53385"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23206",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23206"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68757",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68757"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53620",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53620"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50539",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50539"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23130",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23130"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49496",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49496"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38349",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38349"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1352",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1352"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53540",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53540"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49552",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49552"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-4741",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-4741"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-24049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39726",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39726"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-48924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-48924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54187",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54187"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-44032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-44032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57895",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57895"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-13735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53694",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53694"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38716",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38716"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-11187",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11187"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56660",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56660"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41023",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41023"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47704",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47704"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21672",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21672"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-15079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36366",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36366"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36123",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36123"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56737",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56737"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21821",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21821"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68206",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68206"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-11935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-11935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68309",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68309"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71158",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71158"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57898",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57898"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-35503",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-35503"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56639",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56639"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68372",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68372"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-3651",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-3651"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-26996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-26996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21651",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21651"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68313",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68313"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58053",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58053"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-26553",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-26553"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-60876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-60876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37776",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37776"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-23840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-23840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-6519",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6519"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46729",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46729"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53850",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53850"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-2975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50266",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50266"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71137",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71137"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-11065",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11065"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23190",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23190"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40123",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40123"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49991",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49991"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-26047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-26047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-2193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-2193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-4382",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4382"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-28693",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-28693"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39706",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39706"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22038",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22038"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54242",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54242"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68289",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68289"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40363",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40363"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40253",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40253"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-27141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61726",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61726"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50518",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50518"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-64756",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-64756"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2016-2568",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-2568"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-13817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-13817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68245",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68245"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-41254",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-41254"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-12929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-12929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53147",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53147"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40317",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40317"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23110",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23110"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53410",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53410"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53254",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53254"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-34064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-47210",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-47210"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-53864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0165",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0165"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0624",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0624"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49177",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49177"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38205",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38205"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23100",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23100"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-59464",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59464"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58241",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58241"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38166",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38166"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68282",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68282"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38045",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38045"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46726",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46726"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68787",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68787"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53647",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53647"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-23133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-23133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-12313",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-12313"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71233",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71233"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68782",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68782"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0166",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0166"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-3872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39744",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39744"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71197",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71197"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68177",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68177"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68758",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68758"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47728",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47728"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-27610",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-27610"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68191",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68191"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23031",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23031"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46730",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46730"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37786",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37786"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46728",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46728"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53561",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53561"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-22998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54172",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54172"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23050",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23050"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-58100",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58100"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-0256",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-0256"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21673",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21673"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21634",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21634"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47738",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47738"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68340",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68340"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54320",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54320"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-30204",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-30204"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-0537",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-0537"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38191",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38191"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-32681",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-32681"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38531",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38531"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-26112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-26112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-6952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-6952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-14304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-14304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68239",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68239"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40258",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40258"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40281",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40281"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38503",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38503"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40110",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40110"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-24001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-29481",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-29481"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40268",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40268"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61661",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61661"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-25740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-25740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50246",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50246"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-3446",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3446"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-14178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40325",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40325"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-2511",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-2511"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-1151",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1151"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68798",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68798"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42273",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42273"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68336",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68336"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23157",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23157"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40303",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40303"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40337",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40337"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-20633",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-20633"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3714",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3714"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56566",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56566"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-46392",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-46392"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40036",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40036"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57993",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57993"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47745",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47745"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53190",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53190"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40262",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40262"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35784",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35784"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56591",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56591"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56544",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56544"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56647",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56647"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21649",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21649"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0685",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0685"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57893",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57893"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-39333",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-39333"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38643",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38643"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52591",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52591"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26648",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26648"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-11868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-11868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-24352",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-24352"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61780",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61780"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38360",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38360"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39715",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39715"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-36407",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-36407"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40323",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40323"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21732",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21732"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-47658",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47658"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68285",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68285"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-4575",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-4575"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-12067",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-12067"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38512",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38512"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50135",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50135"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52648",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52648"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49893",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49893"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-44963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-44963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53348",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53348"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48766",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48766"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-15794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-15794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50467",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50467"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-32441",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32441"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-48875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-48875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-41935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38162",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38162"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-23491",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-23491"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-5678",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5678"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53382",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53382"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39677",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39677"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53651",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53651"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68371",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68371"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50383",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50383"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39707",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39707"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40275",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40275"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53387",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53387"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-45774",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-45774"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22053",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22053"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-13465",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13465"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61664",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61664"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68211",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68211"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-25702",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-25702"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52452",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52452"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-42366",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-42366"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39781",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39781"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-39762",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39762"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-40999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-40999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53292",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53292"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52576",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52576"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-0167",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0167"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-21730",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21730"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-52660",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-52660"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-35995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-35995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69420",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69420"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53371",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53371"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38659",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38659"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68227"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40339",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40339"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-22127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-22127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-47273",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-47273"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-15224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-26605",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-26605"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-27904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38543",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38543"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68263",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68263"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53187",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53187"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38689",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38689"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-1225",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-1225"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38275",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38275"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48744",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48744"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68755",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68755"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-62525",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-62525"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-0175",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-0175"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48706",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48706"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40334",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40334"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68767",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68767"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46716",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46716"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2012-4542",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2012-4542"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3773",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3773"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61729",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61729"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-49267",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-49267"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56592",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56592"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-37854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-37854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38189",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38189"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48628",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48628"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-6345",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6345"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50138",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50138"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40319",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40319"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-44534",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-44534"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-14831",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14831"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56565",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56565"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68727",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68727"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-57872",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57872"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-28720",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-28720"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-47703",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47703"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53742",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53742"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38361",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38361"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-53177",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53177"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56588",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56588"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53452",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53452"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6610",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6610"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-54261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-54261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50616",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50616"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-66418",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66418"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-53544",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-53544"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-49911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-49911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-50708",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-50708"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-3784",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-3784"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68764",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68764"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-9301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-11226",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11226"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2026-03-20T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2026-03-20T00:00:00",
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2026-AVI-0326",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2026-03-20T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans les produits VMware. Elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer un probl\u00e8me de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans les produits VMware",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37233",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37233"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37237",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37237"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37236",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37236"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37246",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37246"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37235",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37235"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37229",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37229"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37226",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37226"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37230",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37230"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37242",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37242"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37228",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37228"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37240",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37240"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37243",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37243"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37234",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37234"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37231",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37231"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37239",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37239"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37227",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37227"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37232",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37232"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37247",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37247"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37241",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37241"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37238",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37238"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37244",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37244"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-19",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 VMware 37245",
"url": "https://support.broadcom.com/web/ecx/support-content-notification/-/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/37245"
}
]
}
CERTFR-2026-AVI-0395
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2026-04-03 - Updated: 2026-04-03
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans les produits IBM. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire à distance, une élévation de privilèges et un déni de service à distance.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
| Vendor | Product | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBM | WebSphere | WebSphere eXtreme Scale versions 8.6.1.x sans le correctif de sécurité PH70422 | ||
| IBM | QRadar SIEM | QRadar SIEM versions 7.5.x antérieures à 7.5.0 UP15 IF01 | ||
| IBM | WebSphere Automation | WebSphere Automation versions antérieures à 1.12.0 | ||
| IBM | Storage Protect | Storage Protect Plus Server versions 10.1.x antérieures à 10.1.18 |
| Title | Publication Time | Tags | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "WebSphere eXtreme Scale versions 8.6.1.x sans le correctif de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 PH70422",
"product": {
"name": "WebSphere",
"vendor": {
"name": "IBM",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "QRadar SIEM versions 7.5.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 7.5.0 UP15 IF01",
"product": {
"name": "QRadar SIEM",
"vendor": {
"name": "IBM",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "WebSphere Automation versions ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 1.12.0",
"product": {
"name": "WebSphere Automation",
"vendor": {
"name": "IBM",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Storage Protect Plus Server versions 10.1.x ant\u00e9rieures \u00e0 10.1.18",
"product": {
"name": "Storage Protect",
"vendor": {
"name": "IBM",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2026-26007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-26007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-40064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-31651",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-31651"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3200",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3200"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-40217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-40217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-21933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-21933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-21932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-21932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42316",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42316"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-3006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-27205",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27205"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2017-18342",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-18342"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-37891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-37891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3733",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3733"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-2255",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2255"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-20477",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-20477"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48468",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48468"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-1747",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-1747"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-38286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43898",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43898"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-20907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-20907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-44568",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-44568"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3572",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3572"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-14343",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-14343"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-33929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-23336",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-23336"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-9947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-9947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-20852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-20852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-5629",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-5629"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-28957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-28957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-6232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-69419",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69419"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-24813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-24813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-45061",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-45061"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-33503",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33503"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-46877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-46877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-42771",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-42771"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-55752",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-55752"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-33928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48565",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48565"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-26116",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26116"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-18074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-18074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-10735",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-10735"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2018-20060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-20060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-40897",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-40897"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-27398",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-27398"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-9636",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-9636"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-21925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-21925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-11340",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-11340"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-21860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-21860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-27043",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-27043"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-1705",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1705"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-23672",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-23672"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-50181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-50181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-55754",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-55754"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-22195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-22195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-23931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-23931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-56337",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-56337"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-42919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-42919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-0450",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0450"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-9948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-9948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-1188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-1188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-45803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-61795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-61795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-27199",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-27199"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-4189",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4189"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-29921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-29921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-52520",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-52520"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3426",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3426"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-12818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-12818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-9740",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-9740"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-20916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-20916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3737",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3737"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42294",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42294"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-33930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-43804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-43804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-27619",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-27619"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-52434",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-52434"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-8492",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-8492"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2022-48560",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48560"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-18874",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-18874"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-49124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-49124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-8869",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8869"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-3177",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-3177"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-34750",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-34750"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-26137",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-26137"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-20270",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-20270"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-11324",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-11324"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-46759",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-46759"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-28863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-28863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-11236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-11236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-21945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-21945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-36880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-36880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-16056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-16056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43820",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43820"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-43821",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-43821"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-3651",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-3651"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-24329",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-24329"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-53506",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-53506"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-31650",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-31650"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-4032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-4032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50067",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50067"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-32681",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-32681"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-50379",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-50379"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-14847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2015-20107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2015-20107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-42321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-52317",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52317"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-28493",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-28493"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-27783",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-27783"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-7548",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-7548"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2020-14422",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2020-14422"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-52316",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-52316"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-33938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-33938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2023-6597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-6597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-43818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-43818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-16935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-16935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-68800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-27291",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-27291"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2019-7164",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2019-7164"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2021-43618",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-43618"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38248",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38248"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-6923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-6923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2024-8088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-8088"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2026-04-03T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2026-04-03T00:00:00",
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2026-AVI-0395",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2026-04-03T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Injection de code indirecte \u00e0 distance (XSS)"
},
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "Injection SQL (SQLi)"
},
{
"description": "Falsification de requ\u00eates c\u00f4t\u00e9 serveur (SSRF)"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "\u00c9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans les produits IBM. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance, une \u00e9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges et un d\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans les produits IBM",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2026-03-31",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 IBM 7268179",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7268179"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-26",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 IBM 7267689",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7267689"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-04-01",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 IBM 7268331",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7268331"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-03-27",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 IBM 7267801",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7267801"
}
]
}
FKIE_CVE-2024-42321
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2024-08-17 09:15 - Updated: 2026-06-17 07:49| URL | Tags | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/120f1c857a73e52132e473dee89b340440cb692b | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4afbac11f2f629d1e62817c4e210bdfaa7521107 | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c5d21aabf1b31a79f228508af33aee83456bc1b0 | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/eb03d9826aa646577342a952d658d4598381c035 | Patch | |
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/01/msg00001.html |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * |
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"net/core/flow_dissector.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "eb03d9826aa646577342a952d658d4598381c035",
"status": "affected",
"version": "9b52e3f267a6835efd50ed9002d530666d16a411",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "4afbac11f2f629d1e62817c4e210bdfaa7521107",
"status": "affected",
"version": "9b52e3f267a6835efd50ed9002d530666d16a411",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "c5d21aabf1b31a79f228508af33aee83456bc1b0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "9b52e3f267a6835efd50ed9002d530666d16a411",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "120f1c857a73e52132e473dee89b340440cb692b",
"status": "affected",
"version": "9b52e3f267a6835efd50ed9002d530666d16a411",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"net/core/flow_dissector.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.2"
},
{
"lessThan": "5.2",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.103",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.44",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.10.3",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.11",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "F0D49D07-075D-4CF5-903C-FB02B26570CB",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.103",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.2",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "CC912330-6B41-4C6B-99AF-F3857FBACB6A",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.44",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.2",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "92D388F2-1EAF-4CFA-AC06-5B26D762EA7D",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.10.3",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.7",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: flow_dissector: use DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE\n\nThe following splat is easy to reproduce upstream as well as in -stable\nkernels. Florian Westphal provided the following commit:\n\n d1dab4f71d37 (\"net: add and use __skb_get_hash_symmetric_net\")\n\nbut this complementary fix has been also suggested by Willem de Bruijn\nand it can be easily backported to -stable kernel which consists in\nusing DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE instead to silence the following splat\ngiven __skb_get_hash() is used by the nftables tracing infrastructure to\nto identify packets in traces.\n\n[69133.561393] ------------[ cut here ]------------\n[69133.561404] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 43576 at net/core/flow_dissector.c:1104 __skb_flow_dissect+0x134f/\n[...]\n[69133.561944] CPU: 0 PID: 43576 Comm: socat Not tainted 6.10.0-rc7+ #379\n[69133.561959] RIP: 0010:__skb_flow_dissect+0x134f/0x2ad0\n[69133.561970] Code: 83 f9 04 0f 84 b3 00 00 00 45 85 c9 0f 84 aa 00 00 00 41 83 f9 02 0f 84 81 fc ff\nff 44 0f b7 b4 24 80 00 00 00 e9 8b f9 ff ff \u003c0f\u003e 0b e9 20 f3 ff ff 41 f6 c6 20 0f 84 e4 ef ff ff 48 8d 7b 12 e8\n[69133.561979] RSP: 0018:ffffc90000006fc0 EFLAGS: 00010246\n[69133.561988] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffff82f33e20 RCX: ffffffff81ab7e19\n[69133.561994] RDX: dffffc0000000000 RSI: ffffc90000007388 RDI: ffff888103a1b418\n[69133.562001] RBP: ffffc90000007310 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000\n[69133.562007] R10: ffffc90000007388 R11: ffffffff810cface R12: ffff888103a1b400\n[69133.562013] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffffffff82f33e2a R15: ffffffff82f33e28\n[69133.562020] FS: 00007f40f7131740(0000) GS:ffff888390800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n[69133.562027] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n[69133.562033] CR2: 00007f40f7346ee0 CR3: 000000015d200001 CR4: 00000000001706f0\n[69133.562040] Call Trace:\n[69133.562044] \u003cIRQ\u003e\n[69133.562049] ? __warn+0x9f/0x1a0\n[ 1211.841384] ? __skb_flow_dissect+0x107e/0x2860\n[...]\n[ 1211.841496] ? bpf_flow_dissect+0x160/0x160\n[ 1211.841753] __skb_get_hash+0x97/0x280\n[ 1211.841765] ? __skb_get_hash_symmetric+0x230/0x230\n[ 1211.841776] ? mod_find+0xbf/0xe0\n[ 1211.841786] ? get_stack_info_noinstr+0x12/0xe0\n[ 1211.841798] ? bpf_ksym_find+0x56/0xe0\n[ 1211.841807] ? __rcu_read_unlock+0x2a/0x70\n[ 1211.841819] nft_trace_init+0x1b9/0x1c0 [nf_tables]\n[ 1211.841895] ? nft_trace_notify+0x830/0x830 [nf_tables]\n[ 1211.841964] ? get_stack_info+0x2b/0x80\n[ 1211.841975] ? nft_do_chain_arp+0x80/0x80 [nf_tables]\n[ 1211.842044] nft_do_chain+0x79c/0x850 [nf_tables]"
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: net: flow_dissector: use DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE El siguiente s\u00edmbolo es f\u00e1cil de reproducir tanto en n\u00facleos anteriores como en n\u00facleos estables. Florian Westphal proporcion\u00f3 la siguiente confirmaci\u00f3n: d1dab4f71d37 (\"net: add and use __skb_get_hash_metric_net\") pero Willem de Bruijn tambi\u00e9n sugiri\u00f3 esta soluci\u00f3n complementaria y se puede retroportar f\u00e1cilmente al kernel estable, que consiste en usar DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE en lugar de silenciar lo siguiente splat dado __skb_get_hash() es utilizado por la infraestructura de seguimiento de nftables para identificar paquetes en los seguimientos. [69133.561393] ------------[ cortar aqu\u00ed ]------------ [69133.561404] ADVERTENCIA: CPU: 0 PID: 43576 en net/core/flow_dissector.c :1104 __skb_flow_dissect+0x134f/ [...] [69133.561944] CPU: 0 PID: 43576 Comm: socat No contaminado 6.10.0-rc7+ #379 [69133.561959] RIP: 0010:__skb_flow_dissect+0x134f/0x2ad0 133.561970] C\u00f3digo: 83 f9 04 0f 84 b3 00 00 00 45 85 c9 0f 84 aa 00 00 00 41 83 f9 02 0f 84 81 fc ff ff 44 0f b7 b4 24 80 00 00 00 e9 8b f9 ff ff \u0026lt;0f\u0026gt; 0b e9 20 ff ff 41 f6 c6 20 0f 84 e4 ef ff ff 48 8d 7b 12 e8 [69133.561979] RSP: 0018:ffffc90000006fc0 EFLAGS: 00010246 [69133.561988] RAX: 00000000000000000 RBX: ffffffff82f33e20 RCX: ffffffff81ab7e19 [69133.561994] RDX: dffffc0000000000 RSI: ffffc900000007388 RDI: ffff888103a1b418 [69133.562001] RBP: ffffc90000007310 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [69133.562007] R10: ffffc90000007388 R11: fffffff810cface 2: ffff888103a1b400 [69133.562013] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffffffff82f33e2a R15: ffffffff82f33e28 [69133.562020] FS: 00007f40f7131740(000 0) GS:ffff888390800000(0000 ) knlGS:0000000000000000 [69133.562027] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [69133.562033] CR2: 00007f40f7346ee0 CR3: 5d200001 CR4: 00000000001706f0 [69133.562040] Seguimiento de llamadas: [69133.562044] [69133.562049] ? __advertir+0x9f/0x1a0 [ 1211.841384] ? __skb_flow_dissect+0x107e/0x2860 [...] [ 1211.841496] ? bpf_flow_dissect+0x160/0x160 [ 1211.841753] __skb_get_hash+0x97/0x280 [ 1211.841765] ? __skb_get_hash_metric+0x230/0x230 [1211.841776]? mod_find+0xbf/0xe0 [1211.841786]? get_stack_info_noinstr+0x12/0xe0 [1211.841798]? bpf_ksym_find+0x56/0xe0 [1211.841807]? __rcu_read_unlock+0x2a/0x70 [1211.841819] nft_trace_init+0x1b9/0x1c0 [nf_tables] [1211.841895]? nft_trace_notify+0x830/0x830 [nf_tables] [1211.841964]? get_stack_info+0x2b/0x80 [1211.841975]? nft_do_chain_arp+0x80/0x80 [nf_tables] [ 1211.842044] nft_do_chain+0x79c/0x850 [nf_tables]"
}
],
"id": "CVE-2024-42321",
"lastModified": "2026-06-17T07:49:15.390",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 5.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2024-42321",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2024-09-10T16:09:25.850374Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2024-08-17T09:15:11.917",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/120f1c857a73e52132e473dee89b340440cb692b"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4afbac11f2f629d1e62817c4e210bdfaa7521107"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c5d21aabf1b31a79f228508af33aee83456bc1b0"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/eb03d9826aa646577342a952d658d4598381c035"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/01/msg00001.html"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "NVD-CWE-noinfo"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
GHSA-H7CJ-MMQX-XQ6G
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-08-17 09:30 – Updated: 2025-11-04 00:31In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: flow_dissector: use DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE
The following splat is easy to reproduce upstream as well as in -stable kernels. Florian Westphal provided the following commit:
d1dab4f71d37 ("net: add and use __skb_get_hash_symmetric_net")
but this complementary fix has been also suggested by Willem de Bruijn and it can be easily backported to -stable kernel which consists in using DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE instead to silence the following splat given __skb_get_hash() is used by the nftables tracing infrastructure to to identify packets in traces.
[69133.561393] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [69133.561404] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 43576 at net/core/flow_dissector.c:1104 __skb_flow_dissect+0x134f/ [...] [69133.561944] CPU: 0 PID: 43576 Comm: socat Not tainted 6.10.0-rc7+ #379 [69133.561959] RIP: 0010:__skb_flow_dissect+0x134f/0x2ad0 [69133.561970] Code: 83 f9 04 0f 84 b3 00 00 00 45 85 c9 0f 84 aa 00 00 00 41 83 f9 02 0f 84 81 fc ff ff 44 0f b7 b4 24 80 00 00 00 e9 8b f9 ff ff <0f> 0b e9 20 f3 ff ff 41 f6 c6 20 0f 84 e4 ef ff ff 48 8d 7b 12 e8 [69133.561979] RSP: 0018:ffffc90000006fc0 EFLAGS: 00010246 [69133.561988] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffff82f33e20 RCX: ffffffff81ab7e19 [69133.561994] RDX: dffffc0000000000 RSI: ffffc90000007388 RDI: ffff888103a1b418 [69133.562001] RBP: ffffc90000007310 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [69133.562007] R10: ffffc90000007388 R11: ffffffff810cface R12: ffff888103a1b400 [69133.562013] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffffffff82f33e2a R15: ffffffff82f33e28 [69133.562020] FS: 00007f40f7131740(0000) GS:ffff888390800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [69133.562027] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [69133.562033] CR2: 00007f40f7346ee0 CR3: 000000015d200001 CR4: 00000000001706f0 [69133.562040] Call Trace: [69133.562044] [69133.562049] ? __warn+0x9f/0x1a0 [ 1211.841384] ? __skb_flow_dissect+0x107e/0x2860 [...] [ 1211.841496] ? bpf_flow_dissect+0x160/0x160 [ 1211.841753] __skb_get_hash+0x97/0x280 [ 1211.841765] ? __skb_get_hash_symmetric+0x230/0x230 [ 1211.841776] ? mod_find+0xbf/0xe0 [ 1211.841786] ? get_stack_info_noinstr+0x12/0xe0 [ 1211.841798] ? bpf_ksym_find+0x56/0xe0 [ 1211.841807] ? __rcu_read_unlock+0x2a/0x70 [ 1211.841819] nft_trace_init+0x1b9/0x1c0 [nf_tables] [ 1211.841895] ? nft_trace_notify+0x830/0x830 [nf_tables] [ 1211.841964] ? get_stack_info+0x2b/0x80 [ 1211.841975] ? nft_do_chain_arp+0x80/0x80 [nf_tables] [ 1211.842044] nft_do_chain+0x79c/0x850 [nf_tables]
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-42321"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-08-17T09:15:11Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: flow_dissector: use DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE\n\nThe following splat is easy to reproduce upstream as well as in -stable\nkernels. Florian Westphal provided the following commit:\n\n d1dab4f71d37 (\"net: add and use __skb_get_hash_symmetric_net\")\n\nbut this complementary fix has been also suggested by Willem de Bruijn\nand it can be easily backported to -stable kernel which consists in\nusing DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE instead to silence the following splat\ngiven __skb_get_hash() is used by the nftables tracing infrastructure to\nto identify packets in traces.\n\n[69133.561393] ------------[ cut here ]------------\n[69133.561404] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 43576 at net/core/flow_dissector.c:1104 __skb_flow_dissect+0x134f/\n[...]\n[69133.561944] CPU: 0 PID: 43576 Comm: socat Not tainted 6.10.0-rc7+ #379\n[69133.561959] RIP: 0010:__skb_flow_dissect+0x134f/0x2ad0\n[69133.561970] Code: 83 f9 04 0f 84 b3 00 00 00 45 85 c9 0f 84 aa 00 00 00 41 83 f9 02 0f 84 81 fc ff\nff 44 0f b7 b4 24 80 00 00 00 e9 8b f9 ff ff \u003c0f\u003e 0b e9 20 f3 ff ff 41 f6 c6 20 0f 84 e4 ef ff ff 48 8d 7b 12 e8\n[69133.561979] RSP: 0018:ffffc90000006fc0 EFLAGS: 00010246\n[69133.561988] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffff82f33e20 RCX: ffffffff81ab7e19\n[69133.561994] RDX: dffffc0000000000 RSI: ffffc90000007388 RDI: ffff888103a1b418\n[69133.562001] RBP: ffffc90000007310 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000\n[69133.562007] R10: ffffc90000007388 R11: ffffffff810cface R12: ffff888103a1b400\n[69133.562013] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffffffff82f33e2a R15: ffffffff82f33e28\n[69133.562020] FS: 00007f40f7131740(0000) GS:ffff888390800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n[69133.562027] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n[69133.562033] CR2: 00007f40f7346ee0 CR3: 000000015d200001 CR4: 00000000001706f0\n[69133.562040] Call Trace:\n[69133.562044] \u003cIRQ\u003e\n[69133.562049] ? __warn+0x9f/0x1a0\n[ 1211.841384] ? __skb_flow_dissect+0x107e/0x2860\n[...]\n[ 1211.841496] ? bpf_flow_dissect+0x160/0x160\n[ 1211.841753] __skb_get_hash+0x97/0x280\n[ 1211.841765] ? __skb_get_hash_symmetric+0x230/0x230\n[ 1211.841776] ? mod_find+0xbf/0xe0\n[ 1211.841786] ? get_stack_info_noinstr+0x12/0xe0\n[ 1211.841798] ? bpf_ksym_find+0x56/0xe0\n[ 1211.841807] ? __rcu_read_unlock+0x2a/0x70\n[ 1211.841819] nft_trace_init+0x1b9/0x1c0 [nf_tables]\n[ 1211.841895] ? nft_trace_notify+0x830/0x830 [nf_tables]\n[ 1211.841964] ? get_stack_info+0x2b/0x80\n[ 1211.841975] ? nft_do_chain_arp+0x80/0x80 [nf_tables]\n[ 1211.842044] nft_do_chain+0x79c/0x850 [nf_tables]",
"id": "GHSA-h7cj-mmqx-xq6g",
"modified": "2025-11-04T00:31:14Z",
"published": "2024-08-17T09:30:25Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42321"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/120f1c857a73e52132e473dee89b340440cb692b"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4afbac11f2f629d1e62817c4e210bdfaa7521107"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c5d21aabf1b31a79f228508af33aee83456bc1b0"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/eb03d9826aa646577342a952d658d4598381c035"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/01/msg00001.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
MSRC_CVE-2024-42321
Vulnerability from csaf_microsoft - Published: 2024-08-02 00:00 - Updated: 2026-03-31 14:39OESA-2024-2124 (CVE-2024-36934)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2024-09-14 11:07 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:07 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bna: ensure the copied buf is NUL terminated
Currently, we allocate a nbytes-sized kernel buffer and copy nbytes from userspace to that buffer. Later, we use sscanf on this buffer but we don't ensure that the string is terminated inside the buffer, this can lead to OOB read when using sscanf. Fix this issue by using memdup_user_nul instead of memdup_user.(CVE-2024-36934)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nilfs2: fix potential kernel bug due to lack of writeback flag waiting
Destructive writes to a block device on which nilfs2 is mounted can cause a kernel bug in the folio/page writeback start routine or writeback end routine (__folio_start_writeback in the log below):
kernel BUG at mm/page-writeback.c:3070! Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI ... RIP: 0010:__folio_start_writeback+0xbaa/0x10e0 Code: 25 ff 0f 00 00 0f 84 18 01 00 00 e8 40 ca c6 ff e9 17 f6 ff ff e8 36 ca c6 ff 4c 89 f7 48 c7 c6 80 c0 12 84 e8 e7 b3 0f 00 90 <0f> 0b e8 1f ca c6 ff 4c 89 f7 48 c7 c6 a0 c6 12 84 e8 d0 b3 0f 00 ... Call Trace: <TASK> nilfs_segctor_do_construct+0x4654/0x69d0 [nilfs2] nilfs_segctor_construct+0x181/0x6b0 [nilfs2] nilfs_segctor_thread+0x548/0x11c0 [nilfs2] kthread+0x2f0/0x390 ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 </TASK>
This is because when the log writer starts a writeback for segment summary blocks or a super root block that use the backing device's page cache, it does not wait for the ongoing folio/page writeback, resulting in an inconsistent writeback state.
Fix this issue by waiting for ongoing writebacks when putting folios/pages on the backing device into writeback state.(CVE-2024-37078)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
xfrm6: check ip6_dst_idev() return value in xfrm6_get_saddr()
ip6_dst_idev() can return NULL, xfrm6_get_saddr() must act accordingly.
syzbot reported:
Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000000: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000000007] CPU: 1 PID: 12 Comm: kworker/u8:1 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc2-syzkaller-00383-gb8481381d4e2 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 04/02/2024 Workqueue: wg-kex-wg1 wg_packet_handshake_send_worker RIP: 0010:xfrm6_get_saddr+0x93/0x130 net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.c:64 Code: df 48 89 fa 48 c1 ea 03 80 3c 02 00 0f 85 97 00 00 00 4c 8b ab d8 00 00 00 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 4c 89 ea 48 c1 ea 03 <80> 3c 02 00 0f 85 86 00 00 00 4d 8b 6d 00 e8 ca 13 47 01 48 b8 00 RSP: 0018:ffffc90000117378 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: ffff88807b079dc0 RCX: ffffffff89a0d6d7 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffff89a0d6e9 RDI: ffff88807b079e98 RBP: ffff88807ad73248 R08: 0000000000000007 R09: fffffffffffff000 R10: ffff88807b079dc0 R11: 0000000000000007 R12: ffffc90000117480 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880b9300000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f4586d00440 CR3: 0000000079042000 CR4: 00000000003506f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> xfrm_get_saddr net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:2452 [inline] xfrm_tmpl_resolve_one net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:2481 [inline] xfrm_tmpl_resolve+0xa26/0xf10 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:2541 xfrm_resolve_and_create_bundle+0x140/0x2570 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:2835 xfrm_bundle_lookup net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:3070 [inline] xfrm_lookup_with_ifid+0x4d1/0x1e60 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:3201 xfrm_lookup net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:3298 [inline] xfrm_lookup_route+0x3b/0x200 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:3309 ip6_dst_lookup_flow+0x15c/0x1d0 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:1256 send6+0x611/0xd20 drivers/net/wireguard/socket.c:139 wg_socket_send_skb_to_peer+0xf9/0x220 drivers/net/wireguard/socket.c:178 wg_socket_send_buffer_to_peer+0x12b/0x190 drivers/net/wireguard/socket.c:200 wg_packet_send_handshake_initiation+0x227/0x360 drivers/net/wireguard/send.c:40 wg_packet_handshake_send_worker+0x1c/0x30 drivers/net/wireguard/send.c:51 process_one_work+0x9fb/0x1b60 kernel/workqueue.c:3231 process_scheduled_works kernel/workqueue.c:3312 [inline] worker_thread+0x6c8/0xf70 kernel/workqueue.c:3393 kthread+0x2c1/0x3a0 kernel/kthread.c:389 ret_from_fork+0x45/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244(CVE-2024-40959)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/lima: mask irqs in timeout path before hard reset
There is a race condition in which a rendering job might take just long enough to trigger the drm sched job timeout handler but also still complete before the hard reset is done by the timeout handler. This runs into race conditions not expected by the timeout handler. In some very specific cases it currently may result in a refcount imbalance on lima_pm_idle, with a stack dump such as:
[10136.669170] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_devfreq.c:205 lima_devfreq_record_idle+0xa0/0xb0 ... [10136.669459] pc : lima_devfreq_record_idle+0xa0/0xb0 ... [10136.669628] Call trace: [10136.669634] lima_devfreq_record_idle+0xa0/0xb0 [10136.669646] lima_sched_pipe_task_done+0x5c/0xb0 [10136.669656] lima_gp_irq_handler+0xa8/0x120 [10136.669666] __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x48/0x160 [10136.669679] handle_irq_event+0x4c/0xc0
We can prevent that race condition entirely by masking the irqs at the beginning of the timeout handler, at which point we give up on waiting for that job entirely. The irqs will be enabled again at the next hard reset which is already done as a recovery by the timeout handler.(CVE-2024-40976)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: qedi: Fix crash while reading debugfs attribute
The qedi_dbg_do_not_recover_cmd_read() function invokes sprintf() directly on a __user pointer, which results into the crash.
To fix this issue, use a small local stack buffer for sprintf() and then call simple_read_from_buffer(), which in turns make the copy_to_user() call.
BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 00007f4801111000 PGD 8000000864df6067 P4D 8000000864df6067 PUD 864df7067 PMD 846028067 PTE 0 Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI Hardware name: HPE ProLiant DL380 Gen10/ProLiant DL380 Gen10, BIOS U30 06/15/2023 RIP: 0010:memcpy_orig+0xcd/0x130 RSP: 0018:ffffb7a18c3ffc40 EFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: 00007f4801111000 RBX: 00007f4801111000 RCX: 000000000000000f RDX: 000000000000000f RSI: ffffffffc0bfd7a0 RDI: 00007f4801111000 RBP: ffffffffc0bfd7a0 R08: 725f746f6e5f6f64 R09: 3d7265766f636572 R10: ffffb7a18c3ffd08 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 00007f4881110fff R13: 000000007fffffff R14: ffffb7a18c3ffca0 R15: ffffffffc0bfd7af FS: 00007f480118a740(0000) GS:ffff98e38af00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f4801111000 CR3: 0000000864b8e001 CR4: 00000000007706e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> ? __die_body+0x1a/0x60 ? page_fault_oops+0x183/0x510 ? exc_page_fault+0x69/0x150 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30 ? memcpy_orig+0xcd/0x130 vsnprintf+0x102/0x4c0 sprintf+0x51/0x80 qedi_dbg_do_not_recover_cmd_read+0x2f/0x50 [qedi 6bcfdeeecdea037da47069eca2ba717c84a77324] full_proxy_read+0x50/0x80 vfs_read+0xa5/0x2e0 ? folio_add_new_anon_rmap+0x44/0xa0 ? set_pte_at+0x15/0x30 ? do_pte_missing+0x426/0x7f0 ksys_read+0xa5/0xe0 do_syscall_64+0x58/0x80 ? __count_memcg_events+0x46/0x90 ? count_memcg_event_mm+0x3d/0x60 ? handle_mm_fault+0x196/0x2f0 ? do_user_addr_fault+0x267/0x890 ? exc_page_fault+0x69/0x150 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc RIP: 0033:0x7f4800f20b4d(CVE-2024-40978)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
filelock: Remove locks reliably when fcntl/close race is detected
When fcntl_setlk() races with close(), it removes the created lock with do_lock_file_wait(). However, LSMs can allow the first do_lock_file_wait() that created the lock while denying the second do_lock_file_wait() that tries to remove the lock. Separately, posix_lock_file() could also fail to remove a lock due to GFP_KERNEL allocation failure (when splitting a range in the middle).
After the bug has been triggered, use-after-free reads will occur in lock_get_status() when userspace reads /proc/locks. This can likely be used to read arbitrary kernel memory, but can't corrupt kernel memory.
Fix it by calling locks_remove_posix() instead, which is designed to reliably get rid of POSIX locks associated with the given file and files_struct and is also used by filp_flush().(CVE-2024-41012)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ocfs2: strict bound check before memcmp in ocfs2_xattr_find_entry()
xattr in ocfs2 maybe 'non-indexed', which saved with additional space requested. It's better to check if the memory is out of bound before memcmp, although this possibility mainly comes from crafted poisonous images.(CVE-2024-41016)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ASoC: SOF: Intel: hda: fix null deref on system suspend entry
When system enters suspend with an active stream, SOF core calls hw_params_upon_resume(). On Intel platforms with HDA DMA used to manage the link DMA, this leads to call chain of
hda_dsp_set_hw_params_upon_resume() -> hda_dsp_dais_suspend() -> hda_dai_suspend() -> hda_ipc4_post_trigger()
A bug is hit in hda_dai_suspend() as hda_link_dma_cleanup() is run first, which clears hext_stream->link_substream, and then hda_ipc4_post_trigger() is called with a NULL snd_pcm_substream pointer.(CVE-2024-41037)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
vfio/pci: Init the count variable in collecting hot-reset devices
The count variable is used without initialization, it results in mistakes in the device counting and crashes the userspace if the get hot reset info path is triggered.(CVE-2024-41052)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: mac80211: Avoid address calculations via out of bounds array indexing
req->n_channels must be set before req->channels[] can be used.
This patch fixes one of the issues encountered in 1.
[ 83.964255] UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in net/mac80211/scan.c:364:4 [ 83.964258] index 0 is out of range for type 'struct ieee80211_channel *[]' [...] [ 83.964264] Call Trace: [ 83.964267] <TASK> [ 83.964269] dump_stack_lvl+0x3f/0xc0 [ 83.964274] __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0xec/0x110 [ 83.964278] ieee80211_prep_hw_scan+0x2db/0x4b0 [ 83.964281] __ieee80211_start_scan+0x601/0x990 [ 83.964291] nl80211_trigger_scan+0x874/0x980 [ 83.964295] genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0xe8/0x160 [ 83.964298] genl_rcv_msg+0x240/0x270 [...]
1 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218810(CVE-2024-41071)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nvme-fabrics: use reserved tag for reg read/write command
In some scenarios, if too many commands are issued by nvme command in the same time by user tasks, this may exhaust all tags of admin_q. If a reset (nvme reset or IO timeout) occurs before these commands finish, reconnect routine may fail to update nvme regs due to insufficient tags, which will cause kernel hang forever. In order to workaround this issue, maybe we can let reg_read32()/reg_read64()/reg_write32() use reserved tags. This maybe safe for nvmf:
- For the disable ctrl path, we will not issue connect command
- For the enable ctrl / fw activate path, since connect and reg_xx() are called serially.
So the reserved tags may still be enough while reg_xx() use reserved tags.(CVE-2024-41082)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ata: libata-core: Fix null pointer dereference on error
If the ata_port_alloc() call in ata_host_alloc() fails, ata_host_release() will get called.
However, the code in ata_host_release() tries to free ata_port struct members unconditionally, which can lead to the following:
BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 0000000000003990 PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 10 PID: 594 Comm: (udev-worker) Not tainted 6.10.0-rc5 #44 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-2.fc40 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:ata_host_release.cold+0x2f/0x6e [libata] Code: e4 4d 63 f4 44 89 e2 48 c7 c6 90 ad 32 c0 48 c7 c7 d0 70 33 c0 49 83 c6 0e 41 RSP: 0018:ffffc90000ebb968 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000041 RBX: ffff88810fb52e78 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff88813b3218c0 RDI: ffff88813b3218c0 RBP: ffff88810fb52e40 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 6c65725f74736f68 R10: ffffc90000ebb738 R11: 73692033203a746e R12: 0000000000000004 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000011 R15: 0000000000000006 FS: 00007f6cc55b9980(0000) GS:ffff88813b300000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000000003990 CR3: 00000001122a2000 CR4: 0000000000750ef0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> ? __die_body.cold+0x19/0x27 ? page_fault_oops+0x15a/0x2f0 ? exc_page_fault+0x7e/0x180 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30 ? ata_host_release.cold+0x2f/0x6e [libata] ? ata_host_release.cold+0x2f/0x6e [libata] release_nodes+0x35/0xb0 devres_release_group+0x113/0x140 ata_host_alloc+0xed/0x120 [libata] ata_host_alloc_pinfo+0x14/0xa0 [libata] ahci_init_one+0x6c9/0xd20 [ahci]
Do not access ata_port struct members unconditionally.(CVE-2024-41098)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ice: Fix improper extts handling
Extts events are disabled and enabled by the application ts2phc. However, in case where the driver is removed when the application is running, a specific extts event remains enabled and can cause a kernel crash. As a side effect, when the driver is reloaded and application is started again, remaining extts event for the channel from a previous run will keep firing and the message "extts on unexpected channel" might be printed to the user.
To avoid that, extts events shall be disabled when PTP is released.(CVE-2024-42139)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nvmet: fix a possible leak when destroy a ctrl during qp establishment
In nvmet_sq_destroy we capture sq->ctrl early and if it is non-NULL we know that a ctrl was allocated (in the admin connect request handler) and we need to release pending AERs, clear ctrl->sqs and sq->ctrl (for nvme-loop primarily), and drop the final reference on the ctrl.
However, a small window is possible where nvmet_sq_destroy starts (as a result of the client giving up and disconnecting) concurrently with the nvme admin connect cmd (which may be in an early stage). But before kill_and_confirm of sq->ref (i.e. the admin connect managed to get an sq live reference). In this case, sq->ctrl was allocated however after it was captured in a local variable in nvmet_sq_destroy. This prevented the final reference drop on the ctrl.
Solve this by re-capturing the sq->ctrl after all inflight request has completed, where for sure sq->ctrl reference is final, and move forward based on that.
This issue was observed in an environment with many hosts connecting multiple ctrls simoutanuosly, creating a delay in allocating a ctrl leading up to this race window.(CVE-2024-42152)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
i2c: pnx: Fix potential deadlock warning from del_timer_sync() call in isr
When del_timer_sync() is called in an interrupt context it throws a warning because of potential deadlock. The timer is used only to exit from wait_for_completion() after a timeout so replacing the call with wait_for_completion_timeout() allows to remove the problematic timer and its related functions altogether.(CVE-2024-42153)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mm: fix crashes from deferred split racing folio migration
Even on 6.10-rc6, I've been seeing elusive "Bad page state"s (often on flags when freeing, yet the flags shown are not bad: PG_locked had been set and cleared??), and VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page_ref_count(page) == 0)s from deferred_split_scan()'s folio_put(), and a variety of other BUG and WARN symptoms implying double free by deferred split and large folio migration.
6.7 commit 9bcef5973e31 ("mm: memcg: fix split queue list crash when large folio migration") was right to fix the memcg-dependent locking broken in 85ce2c517ade ("memcontrol: only transfer the memcg data for migration"), but missed a subtlety of deferred_split_scan(): it moves folios to its own local list to work on them without split_queue_lock, during which time folio->_deferred_list is not empty, but even the "right" lock does nothing to secure the folio and the list it is on.
Fortunately, deferred_split_scan() is careful to use folio_try_get(): so folio_migrate_mapping() can avoid the race by folio_undo_large_rmappable() while the old folio's reference count is temporarily frozen to 0 - adding such a freeze in the !mapping case too (originally, folio lock and unmapping and no swap cache left an anon folio unreachable, so no freezing was needed there: but the deferred split queue offers a way to reach it).(CVE-2024-42234)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
s390/mm: Add NULL pointer check to crst_table_free() base_crst_free()
crst_table_free() used to work with NULL pointers before the conversion to ptdescs. Since crst_table_free() can be called with a NULL pointer (error handling in crst_table_upgrade() add an explicit check.
Also add the same check to base_crst_free() for consistency reasons.
In real life this should not happen, since order two GFP_KERNEL allocations will not fail, unless FAIL_PAGE_ALLOC is enabled and used.(CVE-2024-42235)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
firmware: cs_dsp: Validate payload length before processing block
Move the payload length check in cs_dsp_load() and cs_dsp_coeff_load() to be done before the block is processed.
The check that the length of a block payload does not exceed the number of remaining bytes in the firwmware file buffer was being done near the end of the loop iteration. However, some code before that check used the length field without validating it.(CVE-2024-42237)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
firmware: cs_dsp: Return error if block header overflows file
Return an error from cs_dsp_power_up() if a block header is longer than the amount of data left in the file.
The previous code in cs_dsp_load() and cs_dsp_load_coeff() would loop while there was enough data left in the file for a valid region. This protected against overrunning the end of the file data, but it didn't abort the file processing with an error.(CVE-2024-42238)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bpf: Fail bpf_timer_cancel when callback is being cancelled
Given a schedule:
timer1 cb timer2 cb
bpf_timer_cancel(timer2); bpf_timer_cancel(timer1);
Both bpf_timer_cancel calls would wait for the other callback to finish executing, introducing a lockup.
Add an atomic_t count named 'cancelling' in bpf_hrtimer. This keeps track of all in-flight cancellation requests for a given BPF timer. Whenever cancelling a BPF timer, we must check if we have outstanding cancellation requests, and if so, we must fail the operation with an error (-EDEADLK) since cancellation is synchronous and waits for the callback to finish executing. This implies that we can enter a deadlock situation involving two or more timer callbacks executing in parallel and attempting to cancel one another.
Note that we avoid incrementing the cancelling counter for the target timer (the one being cancelled) if bpf_timer_cancel is not invoked from a callback, to avoid spurious errors. The whole point of detecting cur->cancelling and returning -EDEADLK is to not enter a busy wait loop (which may or may not lead to a lockup). This does not apply in case the caller is in a non-callback context, the other side can continue to cancel as it sees fit without running into errors.
Background on prior attempts:
Earlier versions of this patch used a bool 'cancelling' bit and used the following pattern under timer->lock to publish cancellation status.
lock(t->lock); t->cancelling = true; mb(); if (cur->cancelling) return -EDEADLK; unlock(t->lock); hrtimer_cancel(t->timer); t->cancelling = false;
The store outside the critical section could overwrite a parallel requests t->cancelling assignment to true, to ensure the parallely executing callback observes its cancellation status.
It would be necessary to clear this cancelling bit once hrtimer_cancel is done, but lack of serialization introduced races. Another option was explored where bpf_timer_start would clear the bit when (re)starting the timer under timer->lock. This would ensure serialized access to the cancelling bit, but may allow it to be cleared before in-flight hrtimer_cancel has finished executing, such that lockups can occur again.
Thus, we choose an atomic counter to keep track of all outstanding cancellation requests and use it to prevent lockups in case callbacks attempt to cancel each other while executing in parallel.(CVE-2024-42239)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
x86/bhi: Avoid warning in #DB handler due to BHI mitigation
When BHI mitigation is enabled, if SYSENTER is invoked with the TF flag set then entry_SYSENTER_compat() uses CLEAR_BRANCH_HISTORY and calls the clear_bhb_loop() before the TF flag is cleared. This causes the #DB handler (exc_debug_kernel()) to issue a warning because single-step is used outside the entry_SYSENTER_compat() function.
To address this issue, entry_SYSENTER_compat() should use CLEAR_BRANCH_HISTORY after making sure the TF flag is cleared.
The problem can be reproduced with the following sequence:
$ cat sysenter_step.c int main() { asm("pushf; pop %ax; bts $8,%ax; push %ax; popf; sysenter"); }
$ gcc -o sysenter_step sysenter_step.c
$ ./sysenter_step Segmentation fault (core dumped)
The program is expected to crash, and the #DB handler will issue a warning.
Kernel log:
WARNING: CPU: 27 PID: 7000 at arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:1009 exc_debug_kernel+0xd2/0x160 ... RIP: 0010:exc_debug_kernel+0xd2/0x160 ... Call Trace: <#DB> ? show_regs+0x68/0x80 ? __warn+0x8c/0x140 ? exc_debug_kernel+0xd2/0x160 ? report_bug+0x175/0x1a0 ? handle_bug+0x44/0x90 ? exc_invalid_op+0x1c/0x70 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1f/0x30 ? exc_debug_kernel+0xd2/0x160 exc_debug+0x43/0x50 asm_exc_debug+0x1e/0x40 RIP: 0010:clear_bhb_loop+0x0/0xb0 ... </#DB> <TASK> ? entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x8d </TASK>
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mm/shmem: disable PMD-sized page cache if needed
For shmem files, it's possible that PMD-sized page cache can't be supported by xarray. For example, 512MB page cache on ARM64 when the base page size is 64KB can't be supported by xarray. It leads to errors as the following messages indicate when this sort of xarray entry is split.
WARNING: CPU: 34 PID: 7578 at lib/xarray.c:1025 xas_split_alloc+0xf8/0x128 Modules linked in: binfmt_misc nft_fib_inet nft_fib_ipv4 nft_fib_ipv6 \ nft_fib nft_reject_inet nf_reject_ipv4 nf_reject_ipv6 nft_reject \ nft_ct nft_chain_nat nf_nat nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4 \ ip_set rfkill nf_tables nfnetlink vfat fat virtio_balloon drm fuse xfs \ libcrc32c crct10dif_ce ghash_ce sha2_ce sha256_arm64 sha1_ce virtio_net \ net_failover virtio_console virtio_blk failover dimlib virtio_mmio CPU: 34 PID: 7578 Comm: test Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W 6.10.0-rc5-gavin+ #9 Hardware name: QEMU KVM Virtual Machine, BIOS edk2-20240524-1.el9 05/24/2024 pstate: 83400005 (Nzcv daif +PAN -UAO +TCO +DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : xas_split_alloc+0xf8/0x128 lr : split_huge_page_to_list_to_order+0x1c4/0x720 sp : ffff8000882af5f0 x29: ffff8000882af5f0 x28: ffff8000882af650 x27: ffff8000882af768 x26: 0000000000000cc0 x25: 000000000000000d x24: ffff00010625b858 x23: ffff8000882af650 x22: ffffffdfc0900000 x21: 0000000000000000 x20: 0000000000000000 x19: ffffffdfc0900000 x18: 0000000000000000 x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000018000000000 x15: 52f8004000000000 x14: 0000e00000000000 x13: 0000000000002000 x12: 0000000000000020 x11: 52f8000000000000 x10: 52f8e1c0ffff6000 x9 : ffffbeb9619a681c x8 : 0000000000000003 x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : ffff00010b02ddb0 x5 : ffffbeb96395e378 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000cc0 x2 : 000000000000000d x1 : 000000000000000c x0 : 0000000000000000 Call trace: xas_split_alloc+0xf8/0x128 split_huge_page_to_list_to_order+0x1c4/0x720 truncate_inode_partial_folio+0xdc/0x160 shmem_undo_range+0x2bc/0x6a8 shmem_fallocate+0x134/0x430 vfs_fallocate+0x124/0x2e8 ksys_fallocate+0x4c/0xa0 __arm64_sys_fallocate+0x24/0x38 invoke_syscall.constprop.0+0x7c/0xd8 do_el0_svc+0xb4/0xd0 el0_svc+0x44/0x1d8 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x134/0x150 el0t_64_sync+0x17c/0x180
Fix it by disabling PMD-sized page cache when HPAGE_PMD_ORDER is larger than MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER. As Matthew Wilcox pointed, the page cache in a shmem file isn't represented by a multi-index entry and doesn't have this limitation when the xarry entry is split until commit 6b24ca4a1a8d ("mm: Use multi-index entries in the page cache").(CVE-2024-42241)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mm/filemap: make MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER acceptable to xarray
Patch series "mm/filemap: Limit page cache size to that supported by xarray", v2.
Currently, xarray can't support arbitrary page cache size. More details can be found from the WARN_ON() statement in xas_split_alloc(). In our test whose code is attached below, we hit the WARN_ON() on ARM64 system where the base page size is 64KB and huge page size is 512MB. The issue was reported long time ago and some discussions on it can be found here 1.
1 https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-xfs/msg75404.html
In order to fix the issue, we need to adjust MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER to one supported by xarray and avoid PMD-sized page cache if needed. The code changes are suggested by David Hildenbrand.
PATCH1 adjusts MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER to that supported by xarray PATCH[2-3] avoids PMD-sized page cache in the synchronous readahead path PATCH[4] avoids PMD-sized page cache for shmem files if needed
Test program
cat test.c
define _GNU_SOURCE
include <stdio.h>
include <stdlib.h>
include <unistd.h>
include <string.h>
include <fcntl.h>
include <errno.h>
include <sys/syscall.h>
include <sys/mman.h>
define TEST_XFS_FILENAME "/tmp/data"
define TEST_SHMEM_FILENAME "/dev/shm/data"
define TEST_MEM_SIZE 0x20000000
int main(int argc, char *argv) { const char filename; int fd = 0; void buf = (void )-1, *p; int pgsize = getpagesize(); int ret;
if (pgsize != 0x10000) {
fprintf(stderr, "64KB base page size is required\n");
return -EPERM;
}
system("echo force > /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/shmem_enabled");
system("rm -fr /tmp/data");
system("rm -fr /dev/shm/data");
system("echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches");
/* Open xfs or shmem file */
filename = TEST_XFS_FILENAME;
if (argc > 1 && !strcmp(argv[1], "shmem"))
filename = TEST_SHMEM_FILENAME;
fd = open(filename, O_CREAT | O_RDWR | O_TRUNC);
if (fd < 0) {
fprintf(stderr, "Unable to open <%s>\n", filename);
return -EIO;
}
/* Extend file size */
ret = ftruncate(fd, TEST_MEM_SIZE);
if (ret) {
fprintf(stderr, "Error %d to ftruncate()\n", ret);
goto cleanup;
}
/* Create VMA */
buf = mmap(NULL, TEST_MEM_SIZE,
PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
if (buf == (void *)-1) {
fprintf(stderr, "Unable to mmap <%s>\n", filename);
goto cleanup;
}
fprintf(stdout, "mapped buffer at 0x%p\n", buf);
ret = madvise(buf, TEST_MEM_SIZE, MADV_HUGEPAGE);
if (ret) {
fprintf(stderr, "Unable to madvise(MADV_HUGEPAGE)\n");
goto cleanup;
}
/* Populate VMA */
ret = madvise(buf, TEST_MEM_SIZE, MADV_POPULATE_WRITE);
if (ret) {
fprintf(stderr, "Error %d to madvise(MADV_POPULATE_WRITE)\n", ret);
goto cleanup;
}
/* Punch the file to enforce xarray split */
ret = fallocate(fd, FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE | FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE,
TEST_MEM_SIZE - pgsize, pgsize);
if (ret)
fprintf(stderr, "Error %d to fallocate()\n", ret);
cleanup: if (buf != (void *)-1) munmap(buf, TEST_MEM_SIZE); if (fd > 0) close(fd);
return 0;
}
gcc test.c -o test
cat /proc/1/smaps | grep KernelPageSize | head -n 1
KernelPageSize: 64 kB
./test shmem
: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 17 PID: 5253 at lib/xarray.c:1025 xas_split_alloc+0xf8/0x128 Modules linked in: nft_fib_inet nft_fib_ipv4 nft_fib_ipv6 nft_fib \ nft_reject_inet nf_reject_ipv4 nf_reject_ipv6 nft_reject nft_ct \ nft_chain_nat nf_nat nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4 \ ip_set nf_tables rfkill nfnetlink vfat fat virtio_balloon \ drm fuse xfs libcrc32c crct10dif_ce ghash_ce sha2_ce sha256_arm64 \ virtio_net sha1_ce net_failover failover virtio_console virtio_blk \ dimlib virtio_mmio CPU: 17 PID: 5253 Comm: test Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W 6.10.0-rc5-gavin+ #12 Hardware name: QEMU KVM Virtual Machine, BIOS edk2-20240524-1.el9 05/24/2024 pstate: 83400005 (Nzcv daif +PAN -UAO +TC ---truncated---(CVE-2024-42243)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tty: serial: ma35d1: Add a NULL check for of_node
The pdev->dev.of_node can be NULL if the "serial" node is absent. Add a NULL check to return an error in such cases.(CVE-2024-42248)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
cachefiles: add missing lock protection when polling
Add missing lock protection in poll routine when iterating xarray, otherwise:
Even with RCU read lock held, only the slot of the radix tree is ensured to be pinned there, while the data structure (e.g. struct cachefiles_req) stored in the slot has no such guarantee. The poll routine will iterate the radix tree and dereference cachefiles_req accordingly. Thus RCU read lock is not adequate in this case and spinlock is needed here.(CVE-2024-42250)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
gpio: pca953x: fix pca953x_irq_bus_sync_unlock race
Ensure that `i2c_lock' is held when setting interrupt latch and mask in pca953x_irq_bus_sync_unlock() in order to avoid races.
The other (non-probe) call site pca953x_gpio_set_multiple() ensures the lock is held before calling pca953x_write_regs().
The problem occurred when a request raced against irq_bus_sync_unlock() approximately once per thousand reboots on an i.MX8MP based system.
- Normal case
0-0022: write register AI|3a {03,02,00,00,01} Input latch P0 0-0022: write register AI|49 {fc,fd,ff,ff,fe} Interrupt mask P0 0-0022: write register AI|08 {ff,00,00,00,00} Output P3 0-0022: write register AI|12 {fc,00,00,00,00} Config P3
- Race case
0-0022: write register AI|08 {ff,00,00,00,00} Output P3 0-0022: write register AI|08 {03,02,00,00,01} *** Wrong register *** 0-0022: write register AI|12 {fc,00,00,00,00} Config P3 0-0022: write register AI|49 {fc,fd,ff,ff,fe} Interrupt mask P0(CVE-2024-42253)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mm: huge_memory: use !CONFIG_64BIT to relax huge page alignment on 32 bit machines
Yves-Alexis Perez reported commit 4ef9ad19e176 ("mm: huge_memory: don't force huge page alignment on 32 bit") didn't work for x86_32 1. It is because x86_32 uses CONFIG_X86_32 instead of CONFIG_32BIT.
!CONFIG_64BIT should cover all 32 bit machines.
1 https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/CAHbLzkr1LwH3pcTgM+aGQ31ip2bKqiqEQ8=FQB+t2c3dhNKNHA@mail.gmail.com/(CVE-2024-42258)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/i915/gem: Fix Virtual Memory mapping boundaries calculation
Calculating the size of the mapped area as the lesser value between the requested size and the actual size does not consider the partial mapping offset. This can cause page fault access.
Fix the calculation of the starting and ending addresses, the total size is now deduced from the difference between the end and start addresses.
Additionally, the calculations have been rewritten in a clearer and more understandable form.
[Joonas: Add Requires: tag] Requires: 60a2066c5005 ("drm/i915/gem: Adjust vma offset for framebuffer mmap offset") (cherry picked from commit 97b6784753da06d9d40232328efc5c5367e53417)(CVE-2024-42259)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/iucv: fix use after free in iucv_sock_close()
iucv_sever_path() is called from process context and from bh context. iucv->path is used as indicator whether somebody else is taking care of severing the path (or it is already removed / never existed). This needs to be done with atomic compare and swap, otherwise there is a small window where iucv_sock_close() will try to work with a path that has already been severed and freed by iucv_callback_connrej() called by iucv_tasklet_fn().
Example: [452744.123844] Call Trace: [452744.123845] ([<0000001e87f03880>] 0x1e87f03880) [452744.123966] [<00000000d593001e>] iucv_path_sever+0x96/0x138 [452744.124330] [<000003ff801ddbca>] iucv_sever_path+0xc2/0xd0 [af_iucv] [452744.124336] [<000003ff801e01b6>] iucv_sock_close+0xa6/0x310 [af_iucv] [452744.124341] [<000003ff801e08cc>] iucv_sock_release+0x3c/0xd0 [af_iucv] [452744.124345] [<00000000d574794e>] __sock_release+0x5e/0xe8 [452744.124815] [<00000000d5747a0c>] sock_close+0x34/0x48 [452744.124820] [<00000000d5421642>] __fput+0xba/0x268 [452744.124826] [<00000000d51b382c>] task_work_run+0xbc/0xf0 [452744.124832] [<00000000d5145710>] do_notify_resume+0x88/0x90 [452744.124841] [<00000000d5978096>] system_call+0xe2/0x2c8 [452744.125319] Last Breaking-Event-Address: [452744.125321] [<00000000d5930018>] iucv_path_sever+0x90/0x138 [452744.125324] [452744.125325] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt
Note that bh_lock_sock() is not serializing the tasklet context against process context, because the check for sock_owned_by_user() and corresponding handling is missing.
Ideas for a future clean-up patch: A) Correct usage of bh_lock_sock() in tasklet context, as described in Re-enqueue, if needed. This may require adding return values to the tasklet functions and thus changes to all users of iucv.
B) Change iucv tasklet into worker and use only lock_sock() in af_iucv.(CVE-2024-42271)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
sched: act_ct: take care of padding in struct zones_ht_key
Blamed commit increased lookup key size from 2 bytes to 16 bytes, because zones_ht_key got a struct net pointer.
Make sure rhashtable_lookup() is not using the padding bytes which are not initialized.
BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in rht_ptr_rcu include/linux/rhashtable.h:376 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in __rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:607 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:646 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in rhashtable_lookup_fast include/linux/rhashtable.h:672 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in tcf_ct_flow_table_get+0x611/0x2260 net/sched/act_ct.c:329 rht_ptr_rcu include/linux/rhashtable.h:376 [inline] __rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:607 [inline] rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:646 [inline] rhashtable_lookup_fast include/linux/rhashtable.h:672 [inline] tcf_ct_flow_table_get+0x611/0x2260 net/sched/act_ct.c:329 tcf_ct_init+0xa67/0x2890 net/sched/act_ct.c:1408 tcf_action_init_1+0x6cc/0xb30 net/sched/act_api.c:1425 tcf_action_init+0x458/0xf00 net/sched/act_api.c:1488 tcf_action_add net/sched/act_api.c:2061 [inline] tc_ctl_action+0x4be/0x19d0 net/sched/act_api.c:2118 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x12fc/0x1410 net/core/rtnetlink.c:6647 netlink_rcv_skb+0x375/0x650 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2550 rtnetlink_rcv+0x34/0x40 net/core/rtnetlink.c:6665 netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1331 [inline] netlink_unicast+0xf52/0x1260 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1357 netlink_sendmsg+0x10da/0x11e0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1901 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline] __sock_sendmsg+0x30f/0x380 net/socket.c:745 _syssendmsg+0x877/0xb60 net/socket.c:2597 _sys_sendmsg+0x28d/0x3c0 net/socket.c:2651 __sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2680 [inline] __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2689 [inline] __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2687 [inline] __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x307/0x4a0 net/socket.c:2687 x64_sys_call+0x2dd6/0x3c10 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:47 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xcd/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
Local variable key created at: tcf_ct_flow_table_get+0x4a/0x2260 net/sched/act_ct.c:324 tcf_ct_init+0xa67/0x2890 net/sched/act_ct.c:1408(CVE-2024-42272)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nvme-pci: add missing condition check for existence of mapped data
nvme_map_data() is called when request has physical segments, hence the nvme_unmap_data() should have same condition to avoid dereference.(CVE-2024-42276)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
iommu: sprd: Avoid NULL deref in sprd_iommu_hw_en
In sprd_iommu_cleanup() before calling function sprd_iommu_hw_en() dom->sdev is equal to NULL, which leads to null dereference.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2024-42277)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
spi: microchip-core: ensure TX and RX FIFOs are empty at start of a transfer
While transmitting with rx_len == 0, the RX FIFO is not going to be emptied in the interrupt handler. A subsequent transfer could then read crap from the previous transfer out of the RX FIFO into the start RX buffer. The core provides a register that will empty the RX and TX FIFOs, so do that before each transfer.(CVE-2024-42279)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ice: Add a per-VF limit on number of FDIR filters
While the iavf driver adds a s/w limit (128) on the number of FDIR filters that the VF can request, a malicious VF driver can request more than that and exhaust the resources for other VFs.
Add a similar limit in ice.(CVE-2024-42291)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
block: fix deadlock between sd_remove & sd_release
Our test report the following hung task:
[ 2538.459400] INFO: task "kworker/0:0":7 blocked for more than 188 seconds. [ 2538.459427] Call trace: [ 2538.459430] __switch_to+0x174/0x338 [ 2538.459436] __schedule+0x628/0x9c4 [ 2538.459442] schedule+0x7c/0xe8 [ 2538.459447] schedule_preempt_disabled+0x24/0x40 [ 2538.459453] __mutex_lock+0x3ec/0xf04 [ 2538.459456] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x14/0x24 [ 2538.459459] mutex_lock+0x30/0xd8 [ 2538.459462] del_gendisk+0xdc/0x350 [ 2538.459466] sd_remove+0x30/0x60 [ 2538.459470] device_release_driver_internal+0x1c4/0x2c4 [ 2538.459474] device_release_driver+0x18/0x28 [ 2538.459478] bus_remove_device+0x15c/0x174 [ 2538.459483] device_del+0x1d0/0x358 [ 2538.459488] __scsi_remove_device+0xa8/0x198 [ 2538.459493] scsi_forget_host+0x50/0x70 [ 2538.459497] scsi_remove_host+0x80/0x180 [ 2538.459502] usb_stor_disconnect+0x68/0xf4 [ 2538.459506] usb_unbind_interface+0xd4/0x280 [ 2538.459510] device_release_driver_internal+0x1c4/0x2c4 [ 2538.459514] device_release_driver+0x18/0x28 [ 2538.459518] bus_remove_device+0x15c/0x174 [ 2538.459523] device_del+0x1d0/0x358 [ 2538.459528] usb_disable_device+0x84/0x194 [ 2538.459532] usb_disconnect+0xec/0x300 [ 2538.459537] hub_event+0xb80/0x1870 [ 2538.459541] process_scheduled_works+0x248/0x4dc [ 2538.459545] worker_thread+0x244/0x334 [ 2538.459549] kthread+0x114/0x1bc
[ 2538.461001] INFO: task "fsck.":15415 blocked for more than 188 seconds. [ 2538.461014] Call trace: [ 2538.461016] __switch_to+0x174/0x338 [ 2538.461021] __schedule+0x628/0x9c4 [ 2538.461025] schedule+0x7c/0xe8 [ 2538.461030] blk_queue_enter+0xc4/0x160 [ 2538.461034] blk_mq_alloc_request+0x120/0x1d4 [ 2538.461037] scsi_execute_cmd+0x7c/0x23c [ 2538.461040] ioctl_internal_command+0x5c/0x164 [ 2538.461046] scsi_set_medium_removal+0x5c/0xb0 [ 2538.461051] sd_release+0x50/0x94 [ 2538.461054] blkdev_put+0x190/0x28c [ 2538.461058] blkdev_release+0x28/0x40 [ 2538.461063] __fput+0xf8/0x2a8 [ 2538.461066] __fput_sync+0x28/0x5c [ 2538.461070] __arm64_sys_close+0x84/0xe8 [ 2538.461073] invoke_syscall+0x58/0x114 [ 2538.461078] el0_svc_common+0xac/0xe0 [ 2538.461082] do_el0_svc+0x1c/0x28 [ 2538.461087] el0_svc+0x38/0x68 [ 2538.461090] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x68/0xbc [ 2538.461093] el0t_64_sync+0x1a8/0x1ac
T1: T2: sd_remove del_gendisk __blk_mark_disk_dead blk_freeze_queue_start ++q->mq_freeze_depth bdev_release mutex_lock(&disk->open_mutex) sd_release scsi_execute_cmd blk_queue_enter wait_event(!q->mq_freeze_depth) mutex_lock(&disk->open_mutex)
SCSI does not set GD_OWNS_QUEUE, so QUEUE_FLAG_DYING is not set in this scenario. This is a classic ABBA deadlock. To fix the deadlock, make sure we don't try to acquire disk->open_mutex after freezing the queue.(CVE-2024-42294)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
f2fs: fix return value of f2fs_convert_inline_inode()
If device is readonly, make f2fs_convert_inline_inode() return EROFS instead of zero, otherwise it may trigger panic during writeback of inline inode's dirty page as below:
f2fs_write_single_data_page+0xbb6/0x1e90 fs/f2fs/data.c:2888 f2fs_write_cache_pages fs/f2fs/data.c:3187 [inline] __f2fs_write_data_pages fs/f2fs/data.c:3342 [inline] f2fs_write_data_pages+0x1efe/0x3a90 fs/f2fs/data.c:3369 do_writepages+0x359/0x870 mm/page-writeback.c:2634 filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x125/0x180 mm/filemap.c:397 __filemap_fdatawrite_range mm/filemap.c:430 [inline] file_write_and_wait_range+0x1aa/0x290 mm/filemap.c:788 f2fs_do_sync_file+0x68a/0x1ae0 fs/f2fs/file.c:276 generic_write_sync include/linux/fs.h:2806 [inline] f2fs_file_write_iter+0x7bd/0x24e0 fs/f2fs/file.c:4977 call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2114 [inline] new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:497 [inline] vfs_write+0xa72/0xc90 fs/read_write.c:590 ksys_write+0x1a0/0x2c0 fs/read_write.c:643 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f(CVE-2024-42296)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ASoC: fsl: fsl_qmc_audio: Check devm_kasprintf() returned value
devm_kasprintf() can return a NULL pointer on failure but this returned value is not checked.
Fix this lack and check the returned value.(CVE-2024-42298)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
media: imx-pxp: Fix ERR_PTR dereference in pxp_probe()
devm_regmap_init_mmio() can fail, add a check and bail out in case of error.(CVE-2024-42303)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
cifs: fix potential null pointer use in destroy_workqueue in init_cifs error path
Dan Carpenter reported a Smack static checker warning: fs/smb/client/cifsfs.c:1981 init_cifs() error: we previously assumed 'serverclose_wq' could be null (see line 1895)
The patch which introduced the serverclose workqueue used the wrong oredering in error paths in init_cifs() for freeing it on errors.(CVE-2024-42307)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
btrfs: fix extent map use-after-free when adding pages to compressed bio
At add_ra_bio_pages() we are accessing the extent map to calculate 'add_size' after we dropped our reference on the extent map, resulting in a use-after-free. Fix this by computing 'add_size' before dropping our extent map reference.(CVE-2024-42314)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
exfat: fix potential deadlock on __exfat_get_dentry_set
When accessing a file with more entries than ES_MAX_ENTRY_NUM, the bh-array is allocated in __exfat_get_entry_set. The problem is that the bh-array is allocated with GFP_KERNEL. It does not make sense. In the following cases, a deadlock for sbi->s_lock between the two processes may occur.
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
kswapd balance_pgdat lock(fs_reclaim) exfat_iterate lock(&sbi->s_lock) exfat_readdir exfat_get_uniname_from_ext_entry exfat_get_dentry_set __exfat_get_dentry_set kmalloc_array ... lock(fs_reclaim) ... evict exfat_evict_inode lock(&sbi->s_lock)
To fix this, let's allocate bh-array with GFP_NOFS.(CVE-2024-42315)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mm/mglru: fix div-by-zero in vmpressure_calc_level()
evict_folios() uses a second pass to reclaim folios that have gone through page writeback and become clean before it finishes the first pass, since folio_rotate_reclaimable() cannot handle those folios due to the isolation.
The second pass tries to avoid potential double counting by deducting scan_control->nr_scanned. However, this can result in underflow of nr_scanned, under a condition where shrink_folio_list() does not increment nr_scanned, i.e., when folio_trylock() fails.
The underflow can cause the divisor, i.e., scale=scanned+reclaimed in vmpressure_calc_level(), to become zero, resulting in the following crash:
[exception RIP: vmpressure_work_fn+101] process_one_work at ffffffffa3313f2b
Since scan_control->nr_scanned has no established semantics, the potential double counting has minimal risks. Therefore, fix the problem by not deducting scan_control->nr_scanned in evict_folios().(CVE-2024-42316)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mm/huge_memory: avoid PMD-size page cache if needed
xarray can't support arbitrary page cache size. the largest and supported page cache size is defined as MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER by commit 099d90642a71 ("mm/filemap: make MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER acceptable to xarray"). However, it's possible to have 512MB page cache in the huge memory's collapsing path on ARM64 system whose base page size is 64KB. 512MB page cache is breaking the limitation and a warning is raised when the xarray entry is split as shown in the following example.
[root@dhcp-10-26-1-207 ~]# cat /proc/1/smaps | grep KernelPageSize KernelPageSize: 64 kB [root@dhcp-10-26-1-207 ~]# cat /tmp/test.c : int main(int argc, char *argv) { const char filename = TEST_XFS_FILENAME; int fd = 0; void buf = (void )-1, *p; int pgsize = getpagesize(); int ret = 0;
if (pgsize != 0x10000) {
fprintf(stdout, "System with 64KB base page size is required!\n");
return -EPERM;
}
system("echo 0 > /sys/devices/virtual/bdi/253:0/read_ahead_kb");
system("echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches");
/* Open the xfs file */
fd = open(filename, O_RDONLY);
assert(fd > 0);
/* Create VMA */
buf = mmap(NULL, TEST_MEM_SIZE, PROT_READ, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
assert(buf != (void *)-1);
fprintf(stdout, "mapped buffer at 0x%p\n", buf);
/* Populate VMA */
ret = madvise(buf, TEST_MEM_SIZE, MADV_NOHUGEPAGE);
assert(ret == 0);
ret = madvise(buf, TEST_MEM_SIZE, MADV_POPULATE_READ);
assert(ret == 0);
/* Collapse VMA */
ret = madvise(buf, TEST_MEM_SIZE, MADV_HUGEPAGE);
assert(ret == 0);
ret = madvise(buf, TEST_MEM_SIZE, MADV_COLLAPSE);
if (ret) {
fprintf(stdout, "Error %d to madvise(MADV_COLLAPSE)\n", errno);
goto out;
}
/* Split xarray entry. Write permission is needed */
munmap(buf, TEST_MEM_SIZE);
buf = (void *)-1;
close(fd);
fd = open(filename, O_RDWR);
assert(fd > 0);
fallocate(fd, FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE | FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE,
TEST_MEM_SIZE - pgsize, pgsize);
out: if (buf != (void *)-1) munmap(buf, TEST_MEM_SIZE); if (fd > 0) close(fd);
return ret;
}
[root@dhcp-10-26-1-207 ~]# gcc /tmp/test.c -o /tmp/test [root@dhcp-10-26-1-207 ~]# /tmp/test ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 25 PID: 7560 at lib/xarray.c:1025 xas_split_alloc+0xf8/0x128 Modules linked in: nft_fib_inet nft_fib_ipv4 nft_fib_ipv6 nft_fib \ nft_reject_inet nf_reject_ipv4 nf_reject_ipv6 nft_reject nft_ct \ nft_chain_nat nf_nat nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4 \ ip_set rfkill nf_tables nfnetlink vfat fat virtio_balloon drm fuse \ xfs libcrc32c crct10dif_ce ghash_ce sha2_ce sha256_arm64 virtio_net \ sha1_ce net_failover virtio_blk virtio_console failover dimlib virtio_mmio CPU: 25 PID: 7560 Comm: test Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.10.0-rc7-gavin+ #9 Hardware name: QEMU KVM Virtual Machine, BIOS edk2-20240524-1.el9 05/24/2024 pstate: 83400005 (Nzcv daif +PAN -UAO +TCO +DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : xas_split_alloc+0xf8/0x128 lr : split_huge_page_to_list_to_order+0x1c4/0x780 sp : ffff8000ac32f660 x29: ffff8000ac32f660 x28: ffff0000e0969eb0 x27: ffff8000ac32f6c0 x26: 0000000000000c40 x25: ffff0000e0969eb0 x24: 000000000000000d x23: ffff8000ac32f6c0 x22: ffffffdfc0700000 x21: 0000000000000000 x20: 0000000000000000 x19: ffffffdfc0700000 x18: 0000000000000000 x17: 0000000000000000 x16: ffffd5f3708ffc70 x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000 x11: ffffffffffffffc0 x10: 0000000000000040 x9 : ffffd5f3708e692c x8 : 0000000000000003 x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : ffff0000e0969eb8 x5 : ffffd5f37289e378 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000c40 x2 : 000000000000000d x1 : 000000000000000c x0 : 0000000000000000 Call trace: xas_split_alloc+0xf8/0x128 split_huge_page_to_list_to_order+0x1c4/0x780 truncate_inode_partial_folio+0xdc/0x160 truncate_inode_pages_range+0x1b4/0x4a8 truncate_pagecache_range+0x84/0xa ---truncated---(CVE-2024-42317)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
s390/dasd: fix error checks in dasd_copy_pair_store()
dasd_add_busid() can return an error via ERR_PTR() if an allocation fails. However, two callsites in dasd_copy_pair_store() do not check the result, potentially resulting in a NULL pointer dereference. Fix this by checking the result with IS_ERR() and returning the error up the stack.(CVE-2024-42320)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: flow_dissector: use DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE
The following splat is easy to reproduce upstream as well as in -stable kernels. Florian Westphal provided the following commit:
d1dab4f71d37 ("net: add and use __skb_get_hash_symmetric_net")
but this complementary fix has been also suggested by Willem de Bruijn and it can be easily backported to -stable kernel which consists in using DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE instead to silence the following splat given __skb_get_hash() is used by the nftables tracing infrastructure to to identify packets in traces.
[69133.561393] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [69133.561404] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 43576 at net/core/flow_dissector.c:1104 __skb_flow_dissect+0x134f/ [...] [69133.561944] CPU: 0 PID: 43576 Comm: socat Not tainted 6.10.0-rc7+ #379 [69133.561959] RIP: 0010:__skb_flow_dissect+0x134f/0x2ad0 [69133.561970] Code: 83 f9 04 0f 84 b3 00 00 00 45 85 c9 0f 84 aa 00 00 00 41 83 f9 02 0f 84 81 fc ff ff 44 0f b7 b4 24 80 00 00 00 e9 8b f9 ff ff <0f> 0b e9 20 f3 ff ff 41 f6 c6 20 0f 84 e4 ef ff ff 48 8d 7b 12 e8 [69133.561979] RSP: 0018:ffffc90000006fc0 EFLAGS: 00010246 [69133.561988] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffff82f33e20 RCX: ffffffff81ab7e19 [69133.561994] RDX: dffffc0000000000 RSI: ffffc90000007388 RDI: ffff888103a1b418 [69133.562001] RBP: ffffc90000007310 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [69133.562007] R10: ffffc90000007388 R11: ffffffff810cface R12: ffff888103a1b400 [69133.562013] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffffffff82f33e2a R15: ffffffff82f33e28 [69133.562020] FS: 00007f40f7131740(0000) GS:ffff888390800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [69133.562027] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [69133.562033] CR2: 00007f40f7346ee0 CR3: 000000015d200001 CR4: 00000000001706f0 [69133.562040] Call Trace: [69133.562044] <IRQ> [69133.562049] ? __warn+0x9f/0x1a0 [ 1211.841384] ? __skb_flow_dissect+0x107e/0x2860 [...] [ 1211.841496] ? bpf_flow_dissect+0x160/0x160 [ 1211.841753] __skb_get_hash+0x97/0x280 [ 1211.841765] ? __skb_get_hash_symmetric+0x230/0x230 [ 1211.841776] ? mod_find+0xbf/0xe0 [ 1211.841786] ? get_stack_info_noinstr+0x12/0xe0 [ 1211.841798] ? bpf_ksym_find+0x56/0xe0 [ 1211.841807] ? __rcu_read_unlock+0x2a/0x70 [ 1211.841819] nft_trace_init+0x1b9/0x1c0 [nf_tables] [ 1211.841895] ? nft_trace_notify+0x830/0x830 [nf_tables] [ 1211.841964] ? get_stack_info+0x2b/0x80 [ 1211.841975] ? nft_do_chain_arp+0x80/0x80 [nf_tables] [ 1211.842044] nft_do_chain+0x79c/0x850 nf_tables
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: missing check virtio
Two missing check in virtio_net_hdr_to_skb() allowed syzbot to crash kernels again
-
After the skb_segment function the buffer may become non-linear (nr_frags != 0), but since the SKBTX_SHARED_FRAG flag is not set anywhere the __skb_linearize function will not be executed, then the buffer will remain non-linear. Then the condition (offset >= skb_headlen(skb)) becomes true, which causes WARN_ON_ONCE in skb_checksum_help.
-
The struct sk_buff and struct virtio_net_hdr members must be mathematically related. (gso_size) must be greater than (needed) otherwise WARN_ON_ONCE. (remainder) must be greater than (needed) otherwise WARN_ON_ONCE. (remainder) may be 0 if division is without remainder.
offset+2 (4191) > skb_headlen() (1116) WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5084 at net/core/dev.c:3303 skb_checksum_help+0x5e2/0x740 net/core/dev.c:3303 Modules linked in: CPU: 1 PID: 5084 Comm: syz-executor336 Not tainted 6.7.0-rc3-syzkaller-00014-gdf60cee26a2e #0 Hardware name: Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 11/10/2023 RIP: 0010:skb_checksum_help+0x5e2/0x740 net/core/dev.c:3303 Code: 89 e8 83 e0 07 83 c0 03 38 d0 7c 08 84 d2 0f 85 52 01 00 00 44 89 e2 2b 53 74 4c 89 ee 48 c7 c7 40 57 e9 8b e8 af 8f dd f8 90 <0f> 0b 90 90 e9 87 fe ff ff e8 40 0f 6e f9 e9 4b fa ff ff 48 89 ef RSP: 0018:ffffc90003a9f338 EFLAGS: 00010286 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff888025125780 RCX: ffffffff814db209 RDX: ffff888015393b80 RSI: ffffffff814db216 RDI: 0000000000000001 RBP: ffff8880251257f4 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 000000000000045c R13: 000000000000105f R14: ffff8880251257f0 R15: 000000000000105d FS: 0000555555c24380(0000) GS:ffff8880b9900000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 000000002000f000 CR3: 0000000023151000 CR4: 00000000003506f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> ip_do_fragment+0xa1b/0x18b0 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:777 ip_fragment.constprop.0+0x161/0x230 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:584 ip_finish_output_gso net/ipv4/ip_output.c:286 [inline] __ip_finish_output net/ipv4/ip_output.c:308 [inline] __ip_finish_output+0x49c/0x650 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:295 ip_finish_output+0x31/0x310 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:323 NF_HOOK_COND include/linux/netfilter.h:303 [inline] ip_output+0x13b/0x2a0 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:433 dst_output include/net/dst.h:451 [inline] ip_local_out+0xaf/0x1a0 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:129 iptunnel_xmit+0x5b4/0x9b0 net/ipv4/ip_tunnel_core.c:82 ipip6_tunnel_xmit net/ipv6/sit.c:1034 [inline] sit_tunnel_xmit+0xed2/0x28f0 net/ipv6/sit.c:1076 __netdev_start_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:4940 [inline] netdev_start_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:4954 [inline] xmit_one net/core/dev.c:3545 [inline] dev_hard_start_xmit+0x13d/0x6d0 net/core/dev.c:3561 __dev_queue_xmit+0x7c1/0x3d60 net/core/dev.c:4346 dev_queue_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:3134 [inline] packet_xmit+0x257/0x380 net/packet/af_packet.c:276 packet_snd net/packet/af_packet.c:3087 [inline] packet_sendmsg+0x24ca/0x5240 net/packet/af_packet.c:3119 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline] __sock_sendmsg+0xd5/0x180 net/socket.c:745 __sys_sendto+0x255/0x340 net/socket.c:2190 __do_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2202 [inline] __se_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2198 [inline] __x64_sys_sendto+0xe0/0x1b0 net/socket.c:2198 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x40/0x110 arch/x86/entry/common.c:82 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Syzkaller(CVE-2024-43817)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ASoC: amd: Adjust error handling in case of absent codec device
acpi_get_first_physical_node() can return NULL in several cases (no such device, ACPI table error, reference count drop to 0, etc). Existing check just emit error message, but doesn't perform return. Then this NULL pointer is passed to devm_acpi_dev_add_driver_gpios() where it is dereferenced.
Adjust this error handling by adding error code return.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2024-43818)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: lpfc: Fix a possible null pointer dereference
In function lpfc_xcvr_data_show, the memory allocation with kmalloc might fail, thereby making rdp_context a null pointer. In the following context and functions that use this pointer, there are dereferencing operations, leading to null pointer dereference.
To fix this issue, a null pointer check should be added. If it is null, use scnprintf to notify the user and return len.(CVE-2024-43821)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
iio: Fix the sorting functionality in iio_gts_build_avail_time_table
The sorting in iio_gts_build_avail_time_table is not working as intended. It could result in an out-of-bounds access when the time is zero.
Here are more details:
- When the gts->itime_table[i].time_us is zero, e.g., the time
sequence is
3, 0, 1, the inner for-loop will not terminate and do out-of-bound writes. This is because oncetimes[j] > new, the valuenewwill be added in the current position and thetimes[j]will be moved toj+1position, which makes the if-condition always hold. Meanwhile, idx will be added one, making the loop keep running without termination and out-of-bound write. - If none of the gts->itime_table[i].time_us is zero, the elements will just be copied without being sorted as described in the comment "Sort times from all tables to one and remove duplicates".
For more details, please refer to https://lore.kernel.org/all/6dd0d822-046c-4dd2-9532-79d7ab96ec05@gmail.com.(CVE-2024-43825)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nfs: pass explicit offset/count to trace events
nfs_folio_length is unsafe to use without having the folio locked and a check for a NULL ->f_mapping that protects against truncations and can lead to kernel crashes. E.g. when running xfstests generic/065 with all nfs trace points enabled.
Follow the model of the XFS trace points and pass in an explіcit offset and length. This has the additional benefit that these values can be more accurate as some of the users touch partial folio ranges.(CVE-2024-43826)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/qxl: Add check for drm_cvt_mode
Add check for the return value of drm_cvt_mode() and return the error if it fails in order to avoid NULL pointer dereference.(CVE-2024-43829)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
s390/uv: Don't call folio_wait_writeback() without a folio reference
folio_wait_writeback() requires that no spinlocks are held and that a folio reference is held, as documented. After we dropped the PTL, the folio could get freed concurrently. So grab a temporary reference.(CVE-2024-43832)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
media: v4l: async: Fix NULL pointer dereference in adding ancillary links
In v4l2_async_create_ancillary_links(), ancillary links are created for lens and flash sub-devices. These are sub-device to sub-device links and if the async notifier is related to a V4L2 device, the source sub-device of the ancillary link is NULL, leading to a NULL pointer dereference. Check the notifier's sd field is non-NULL in v4l2_async_create_ancillary_links().
Sakari Ailus: Reword the subject and commit messages slightly.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bpf: Fix null pointer dereference in resolve_prog_type() for BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT
When loading a EXT program without specifying attr->attach_prog_fd,
the prog->aux->dst_prog will be null. At this time, calling
resolve_prog_type() anywhere will result in a null pointer dereference.
Example stack trace:
[ 8.107863] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000004 [ 8.108262] Mem abort info: [ 8.108384] ESR = 0x0000000096000004 [ 8.108547] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits [ 8.108722] SET = 0, FnV = 0 [ 8.108827] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 [ 8.108939] FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault [ 8.109102] Data abort info: [ 8.109203] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004, ISS2 = 0x00000000 [ 8.109399] CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0 [ 8.109614] GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0 [ 8.109836] user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000101354000 [ 8.110011] [0000000000000004] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=0000000000000000 [ 8.112624] Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 8.112783] Modules linked in: [ 8.113120] CPU: 0 PID: 99 Comm: may_access_dire Not tainted 6.10.0-rc3-next-20240613-dirty #1 [ 8.113230] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) [ 8.113390] pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 8.113429] pc : may_access_direct_pkt_data+0x24/0xa0 [ 8.113746] lr : add_subprog_and_kfunc+0x634/0x8e8 [ 8.113798] sp : ffff80008283b9f0 [ 8.113813] x29: ffff80008283b9f0 x28: ffff800082795048 x27: 0000000000000001 [ 8.113881] x26: ffff0000c0bb2600 x25: 0000000000000000 x24: 0000000000000000 [ 8.113897] x23: ffff0000c1134000 x22: 000000000001864f x21: ffff0000c1138000 [ 8.113912] x20: 0000000000000001 x19: ffff0000c12b8000 x18: ffffffffffffffff [ 8.113929] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 0720072007200720 [ 8.113944] x14: 0720072007200720 x13: 0720072007200720 x12: 0720072007200720 [ 8.113958] x11: 0720072007200720 x10: 0000000000f9fca4 x9 : ffff80008021f4e4 [ 8.113991] x8 : 0101010101010101 x7 : 746f72705f6d656d x6 : 000000001e0e0f5f [ 8.114006] x5 : 000000000001864f x4 : ffff0000c12b8000 x3 : 000000000000001c [ 8.114020] x2 : 0000000000000002 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : 0000000000000000 [ 8.114126] Call trace: [ 8.114159] may_access_direct_pkt_data+0x24/0xa0 [ 8.114202] bpf_check+0x3bc/0x28c0 [ 8.114214] bpf_prog_load+0x658/0xa58 [ 8.114227] __sys_bpf+0xc50/0x2250 [ 8.114240] __arm64_sys_bpf+0x28/0x40 [ 8.114254] invoke_syscall.constprop.0+0x54/0xf0 [ 8.114273] do_el0_svc+0x4c/0xd8 [ 8.114289] el0_svc+0x3c/0x140 [ 8.114305] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x134/0x150 [ 8.114331] el0t_64_sync+0x168/0x170 [ 8.114477] Code: 7100707f 54000081 f9401c00 f9403800 (b9400403) [ 8.118672] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
One way to fix it is by forcing attach_prog_fd non-empty when
bpf_prog_load(). But this will lead to libbpf_probe_bpf_prog_type
API broken which use verifier log to probe prog type and will log
nothing if we reject invalid EXT prog before bpf_check().
Another way is by adding null check in resolve_prog_type().
The issue was introduced by commit 4a9c7bbe2ed4 ("bpf: Resolve to prog->aux->dst_prog->type only for BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT") which wanted to correct type resolution for BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING programs. Before that, the type resolution of BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT prog actually follows the logic below:
prog->aux->dst_prog ? prog->aux->dst_prog->type : prog->type;
It implies that when EXT program is not yet attached to dst_prog,
the prog type should be EXT itself. This code worked fine in the past.
So just keep using it.
Fix this by returning prog->type for BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT if dst_prog
is not present in resolve_prog_type().(CVE-2024-43837)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: virt_wifi: avoid reporting connection success with wrong SSID
When user issues a connection with a different SSID than the one virt_wifi has advertised, the __cfg80211_connect_result() will trigger the warning: WARN_ON(bss_not_found).
The issue is because the connection code in virt_wifi does not check the SSID from user space (it only checks the BSSID), and virt_wifi will call cfg80211_connect_result() with WLAN_STATUS_SUCCESS even if the SSID is different from the one virt_wifi has advertised. Eventually cfg80211 won't be able to find the cfg80211_bss and generate the warning.
Fixed it by checking the SSID (from user space) in the connection code.(CVE-2024-43841)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: rtw89: Fix array index mistake in rtw89_sta_info_get_iter()
In rtw89_sta_info_get_iter() 'status->he_gi' is compared to array size. But then 'rate->he_gi' is used as array index instead of 'status->he_gi'. This can lead to go beyond array boundaries in case of 'rate->he_gi' is not equal to 'status->he_gi' and is bigger than array size. Looks like "copy-paste" mistake.
Fix this mistake by replacing 'rate->he_gi' with 'status->he_gi'.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2024-43842)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
udf: Fix bogus checksum computation in udf_rename()
Syzbot reports uninitialized memory access in udf_rename() when updating checksum of '..' directory entry of a moved directory. This is indeed true as we pass on-stack diriter.fi to the udf_update_tag() and because that has only struct fileIdentDesc included in it and not the impUse or name fields, the checksumming function is going to checksum random stack contents beyond the end of the structure. This is actually harmless because the following udf_fiiter_write_fi() will recompute the checksum from on-disk buffers where everything is properly included. So all that is needed is just removing the bogus calculation.(CVE-2024-43845)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
lib: objagg: Fix general protection fault
The library supports aggregation of objects into other objects only if the parent object does not have a parent itself. That is, nesting is not supported.
Aggregation happens in two cases: Without and with hints, where hints are a pre-computed recommendation on how to aggregate the provided objects.
Nesting is not possible in the first case due to a check that prevents it, but in the second case there is no check because the assumption is that nesting cannot happen when creating objects based on hints. The violation of this assumption leads to various warnings and eventually to a general protection fault 1.
Before fixing the root cause, error out when nesting happens and warn.
1 general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdead000000000d90: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI CPU: 1 PID: 1083 Comm: kworker/1:9 Tainted: G W 6.9.0-rc6-custom-gd9b4f1cca7fb #7 Hardware name: Mellanox Technologies Ltd. MSN3700/VMOD0005, BIOS 5.11 01/06/2019 Workqueue: mlxsw_core mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work RIP: 0010:mlxsw_sp_acl_erp_bf_insert+0x25/0x80 [...] Call Trace: <TASK> mlxsw_sp_acl_atcam_entry_add+0x256/0x3c0 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_entry_create+0x5e/0xa0 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vchunk_migrate_one+0x16b/0x270 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work+0xbe/0x510 process_one_work+0x151/0x370 worker_thread+0x2cb/0x3e0 kthread+0xd0/0x100 ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 </TASK>(CVE-2024-43846)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: ath12k: fix invalid memory access while processing fragmented packets
The monitor ring and the reo reinject ring share the same ring mask index. When the driver receives an interrupt for the reo reinject ring, the monitor ring is also processed, leading to invalid memory access. Since monitor support is not yet enabled in ath12k, the ring mask for the monitor ring should be removed.
Tested-on: QCN9274 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.WBE.1.1.1-00209-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1(CVE-2024-43847)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
soc: qcom: pdr: protect locator_addr with the main mutex
If the service locator server is restarted fast enough, the PDR can rewrite locator_addr fields concurrently. Protect them by placing modification of those fields under the main pdr->lock.(CVE-2024-43849)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
soc: qcom: icc-bwmon: Fix refcount imbalance seen during bwmon_remove
The following warning is seen during bwmon_remove due to refcount imbalance, fix this by releasing the OPPs after use.
Logs: WARNING: at drivers/opp/core.c:1640 _opp_table_kref_release+0x150/0x158 Hardware name: Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. X1E80100 CRD (DT) ... Call trace: _opp_table_kref_release+0x150/0x158 dev_pm_opp_remove_table+0x100/0x1b4 devm_pm_opp_of_table_release+0x10/0x1c devm_action_release+0x14/0x20 devres_release_all+0xa4/0x104 device_unbind_cleanup+0x18/0x60 device_release_driver_internal+0x1ec/0x228 driver_detach+0x50/0x98 bus_remove_driver+0x6c/0xbc driver_unregister+0x30/0x60 platform_driver_unregister+0x14/0x20 bwmon_driver_exit+0x18/0x524 [icc_bwmon] __arm64_sys_delete_module+0x184/0x264 invoke_syscall+0x48/0x118 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xc8/0xe8 do_el0_svc+0x20/0x2c el0_svc+0x34/0xdc el0t_64_sync_handler+0x13c/0x158 el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 --[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---(CVE-2024-43850)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
soc: xilinx: rename cpu_number1 to dummy_cpu_number
The per cpu variable cpu_number1 is passed to xlnx_event_handler as argument "dev_id", but it is not used in this function. So drop the initialization of this variable and rename it to dummy_cpu_number. This patch is to fix the following call trace when the kernel option CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP is enabled:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at include/linux/sched/mm.h:274 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 1, name: swapper/0 preempt_count: 1, expected: 0 CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.1.0 #53 Hardware name: Xilinx Versal vmk180 Eval board rev1.1 (QSPI) (DT) Call trace: dump_backtrace+0xd0/0xe0 show_stack+0x18/0x40 dump_stack_lvl+0x7c/0xa0 dump_stack+0x18/0x34 __might_resched+0x10c/0x140 __might_sleep+0x4c/0xa0 __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0xf4/0x168 kmalloc_trace+0x28/0x38 __request_percpu_irq+0x74/0x138 xlnx_event_manager_probe+0xf8/0x298 platform_probe+0x68/0xd8(CVE-2024-43851)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
md: fix deadlock between mddev_suspend and flush bio
Deadlock occurs when mddev is being suspended while some flush bio is in progress. It is a complex issue.
T1. the first flush is at the ending stage, it clears 'mddev->flush_bio' and tries to submit data, but is blocked because mddev is suspended by T4. T2. the second flush sets 'mddev->flush_bio', and attempts to queue md_submit_flush_data(), which is already running (T1) and won't execute again if on the same CPU as T1. T3. the third flush inc active_io and tries to flush, but is blocked because 'mddev->flush_bio' is not NULL (set by T2). T4. mddev_suspend() is called and waits for active_io dec to 0 which is inc by T3.
T1 T2 T3 T4 (flush 1) (flush 2) (third 3) (suspend) md_submit_flush_data mddev->flush_bio = NULL; . . md_flush_request . mddev->flush_bio = bio . queue submit_flushes . . . . md_handle_request . . active_io + 1 . . md_flush_request . . wait !mddev->flush_bio . . . . mddev_suspend . . wait !active_io . . . submit_flushes . queue_work md_submit_flush_data . //md_submit_flush_data is already running (T1) . md_handle_request wait resume
The root issue is non-atomic inc/dec of active_io during flush process. active_io is dec before md_submit_flush_data is queued, and inc soon after md_submit_flush_data() run. md_flush_request active_io + 1 submit_flushes active_io - 1 md_submit_flush_data md_handle_request active_io + 1 make_request active_io - 1
If active_io is dec after md_handle_request() instead of within submit_flushes(), make_request() can be called directly intead of md_handle_request() in md_submit_flush_data(), and active_io will only inc and dec once in the whole flush process. Deadlock will be fixed.
Additionally, the only difference between fixing the issue and before is that there is no return error handling of make_request(). But after previous patch cleaned md_write_start(), make_requst() only return error in raid5_make_request() by dm-raid, see commit 41425f96d7aa ("dm-raid456, md/raid456: fix a deadlock for dm-raid456 while io concurrent with reshape)". Since dm always splits data and flush operation into two separate io, io size of flush submitted by dm always is 0, make_request() will not be called in md_submit_flush_data(). To prevent future modifications from introducing issues, add WARN_ON to ensure make_request() no error is returned in this context.(CVE-2024-43855)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
dma: fix call order in dmam_free_coherent
dmam_free_coherent() frees a DMA allocation, which makes the freed vaddr available for reuse, then calls devres_destroy() to remove and free the data structure used to track the DMA allocation. Between the two calls, it is possible for a concurrent task to make an allocation with the same vaddr and add it to the devres list.
If this happens, there will be two entries in the devres list with the same vaddr and devres_destroy() can free the wrong entry, triggering the WARN_ON() in dmam_match.
Fix by destroying the devres entry before freeing the DMA allocation.
kokonut //net/encryption http://sponge2/b9145fe6-0f72-4325-ac2f-a84d81075b03(CVE-2024-43856)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
f2fs: fix to truncate preallocated blocks in f2fs_file_open()
chenyuwen reports a f2fs bug as below:
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000011 fscrypt_set_bio_crypt_ctx+0x78/0x1e8 f2fs_grab_read_bio+0x78/0x208 f2fs_submit_page_read+0x44/0x154 f2fs_get_read_data_page+0x288/0x5f4 f2fs_get_lock_data_page+0x60/0x190 truncate_partial_data_page+0x108/0x4fc f2fs_do_truncate_blocks+0x344/0x5f0 f2fs_truncate_blocks+0x6c/0x134 f2fs_truncate+0xd8/0x200 f2fs_iget+0x20c/0x5ac do_garbage_collect+0x5d0/0xf6c f2fs_gc+0x22c/0x6a4 f2fs_disable_checkpoint+0xc8/0x310 f2fs_fill_super+0x14bc/0x1764 mount_bdev+0x1b4/0x21c f2fs_mount+0x20/0x30 legacy_get_tree+0x50/0xbc vfs_get_tree+0x5c/0x1b0 do_new_mount+0x298/0x4cc path_mount+0x33c/0x5fc __arm64_sys_mount+0xcc/0x15c invoke_syscall+0x60/0x150 el0_svc_common+0xb8/0xf8 do_el0_svc+0x28/0xa0 el0_svc+0x24/0x84 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x88/0xec
It is because inode.i_crypt_info is not initialized during below path: - mount - f2fs_fill_super - f2fs_disable_checkpoint - f2fs_gc - f2fs_iget - f2fs_truncate
So, let's relocate truncation of preallocated blocks to f2fs_file_open(), after fscrypt_file_open().(CVE-2024-43859)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
usb: vhci-hcd: Do not drop references before new references are gained
At a few places the driver carries stale pointers to references that can still be used. Make sure that does not happen. This strictly speaking closes ZDI-CAN-22273, though there may be similar races in the driver.(CVE-2024-43883)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: MGMT: Add error handling to pair_device()
hci_conn_params_add() never checks for a NULL value and could lead to a NULL pointer dereference causing a crash.
Fixed by adding error handling in the function.(CVE-2024-43884)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
padata: Fix possible divide-by-0 panic in padata_mt_helper()
We are hit with a not easily reproducible divide-by-0 panic in padata.c at bootup time.
[ 10.017908] Oops: divide error: 0000 1 PREEMPT SMP NOPTI [ 10.017908] CPU: 26 PID: 2627 Comm: kworker/u1666:1 Not tainted 6.10.0-15.el10.x86_64 #1 [ 10.017908] Hardware name: Lenovo ThinkSystem SR950 [7X12CTO1WW]/[7X12CTO1WW], BIOS [PSE140J-2.30] 07/20/2021 [ 10.017908] Workqueue: events_unbound padata_mt_helper [ 10.017908] RIP: 0010:padata_mt_helper+0x39/0xb0 : [ 10.017963] Call Trace: [ 10.017968] <TASK> [ 10.018004] ? padata_mt_helper+0x39/0xb0 [ 10.018084] process_one_work+0x174/0x330 [ 10.018093] worker_thread+0x266/0x3a0 [ 10.018111] kthread+0xcf/0x100 [ 10.018124] ret_from_fork+0x31/0x50 [ 10.018138] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 10.018147] </TASK>
Looking at the padata_mt_helper() function, the only way a divide-by-0 panic can happen is when ps->chunk_size is 0. The way that chunk_size is initialized in padata_do_multithreaded(), chunk_size can be 0 when the min_chunk in the passed-in padata_mt_job structure is 0.
Fix this divide-by-0 panic by making sure that chunk_size will be at least 1 no matter what the input parameters are.(CVE-2024-43889)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tracing: Fix overflow in get_free_elt()
"tracing_map->next_elt" in get_free_elt() is at risk of overflowing.
Once it overflows, new elements can still be inserted into the tracing_map
even though the maximum number of elements (max_elts) has been reached.
Continuing to insert elements after the overflow could result in the
tracing_map containing "tracing_map->max_size" elements, leaving no empty
entries.
If any attempt is made to insert an element into a full tracing_map using
__tracing_map_insert(), it will cause an infinite loop with preemption
disabled, leading to a CPU hang problem.
Fix this by preventing any further increments to "tracing_map->next_elt" once it reaches "tracing_map->max_elt".(CVE-2024-43890)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tracing: Have format file honor EVENT_FILE_FL_FREED
When eventfs was introduced, special care had to be done to coordinate the freeing of the file meta data with the files that are exposed to user space. The file meta data would have a ref count that is set when the file is created and would be decremented and freed after the last user that opened the file closed it. When the file meta data was to be freed, it would set a flag (EVENT_FILE_FL_FREED) to denote that the file is freed, and any new references made (like new opens or reads) would fail as it is marked freed. This allowed other meta data to be freed after this flag was set (under the event_mutex).
All the files that were dynamically created in the events directory had a pointer to the file meta data and would call event_release() when the last reference to the user space file was closed. This would be the time that it is safe to free the file meta data.
A shortcut was made for the "format" file. It's i_private would point to the "call" entry directly and not point to the file's meta data. This is because all format files are the same for the same "call", so it was thought there was no reason to differentiate them. The other files maintain state (like the "enable", "trigger", etc). But this meant if the file were to disappear, the "format" file would be unaware of it.
This caused a race that could be trigger via the user_events test (that would create dynamic events and free them), and running a loop that would read the user_events format files:
In one console run:
# cd tools/testing/selftests/user_events # while true; do ./ftrace_test; done
And in another console run:
# cd /sys/kernel/tracing/ # while true; do cat events/user_events/__test_event/format; done 2>/dev/null
With KASAN memory checking, it would trigger a use-after-free bug report (which was a real bug). This was because the format file was not checking the file's meta data flag "EVENT_FILE_FL_FREED", so it would access the event that the file meta data pointed to after the event was freed.
After inspection, there are other locations that were found to not check the EVENT_FILE_FL_FREED flag when accessing the trace_event_file. Add a new helper function: event_file_file() that will make sure that the event_mutex is held, and will return NULL if the trace_event_file has the EVENT_FILE_FL_FREED flag set. Have the first reference of the struct file pointer use event_file_file() and check for NULL. Later uses can still use the event_file_data() helper function if the event_mutex is still held and was not released since the event_file_file() call.(CVE-2024-43891)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: Skip Recompute DSC Params if no Stream on Link
[why] Encounter NULL pointer dereference uner mst + dsc setup.
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000008 PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 4 PID: 917 Comm: sway Not tainted 6.3.9-arch1-1 #1 124dc55df4f5272ccb409f39ef4872fc2b3376a2 Hardware name: LENOVO 20NKS01Y00/20NKS01Y00, BIOS R12ET61W(1.31 ) 07/28/2022 RIP: 0010:drm_dp_atomic_find_time_slots+0x5e/0x260 [drm_display_helper] Code: 01 00 00 48 8b 85 60 05 00 00 48 63 80 88 00 00 00 3b 43 28 0f 8d 2e 01 00 00 48 8b 53 30 48 8d 04 80 48 8d 04 c2 48 8b 40 18 <48> 8> RSP: 0018:ffff960cc2df77d8 EFLAGS: 00010293 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8afb87e81280 RCX: 0000000000000224 RDX: ffff8afb9ee37c00 RSI: ffff8afb8da1a578 RDI: ffff8afb87e81280 RBP: ffff8afb83d67000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffff8afb9652f850 R10: ffff960cc2df7908 R11: 0000000000000002 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: ffff8afb8d7688a0 R14: ffff8afb8da1a578 R15: 0000000000000224 FS: 00007f4dac35ce00(0000) GS:ffff8afe30b00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000000000008 CR3: 000000010ddc6000 CR4: 00000000003506e0 Call Trace: <TASK> ? __die+0x23/0x70 ? page_fault_oops+0x171/0x4e0 ? plist_add+0xbe/0x100 ? exc_page_fault+0x7c/0x180 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30 ? drm_dp_atomic_find_time_slots+0x5e/0x260 [drm_display_helper 0e67723696438d8e02b741593dd50d80b44c2026] ? drm_dp_atomic_find_time_slots+0x28/0x260 [drm_display_helper 0e67723696438d8e02b741593dd50d80b44c2026] compute_mst_dsc_configs_for_link+0x2ff/0xa40 [amdgpu 62e600d2a75e9158e1cd0a243bdc8e6da040c054] ? fill_plane_buffer_attributes+0x419/0x510 [amdgpu 62e600d2a75e9158e1cd0a243bdc8e6da040c054] compute_mst_dsc_configs_for_state+0x1e1/0x250 [amdgpu 62e600d2a75e9158e1cd0a243bdc8e6da040c054] amdgpu_dm_atomic_check+0xecd/0x1190 [amdgpu 62e600d2a75e9158e1cd0a243bdc8e6da040c054] drm_atomic_check_only+0x5c5/0xa40 drm_mode_atomic_ioctl+0x76e/0xbc0
[how] dsc recompute should be skipped if no mode change detected on the new request. If detected, keep checking whether the stream is already on current state or not.
(cherry picked from commit 8151a6c13111b465dbabe07c19f572f7cbd16fef)(CVE-2024-43895)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: drop bad gso csum_start and offset in virtio_net_hdr
Tighten csum_start and csum_offset checks in virtio_net_hdr_to_skb for GSO packets.
The function already checks that a checksum requested with VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_NEEDS_CSUM is in skb linear. But for GSO packets this might not hold for segs after segmentation.
Syzkaller demonstrated to reach this warning in skb_checksum_help
offset = skb_checksum_start_offset(skb);
ret = -EINVAL;
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(offset >= skb_headlen(skb)))
By injecting a TSO packet:
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 3539 at net/core/dev.c:3284 skb_checksum_help+0x3d0/0x5b0 ip_do_fragment+0x209/0x1b20 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:774 ip_finish_output_gso net/ipv4/ip_output.c:279 [inline] __ip_finish_output+0x2bd/0x4b0 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:301 iptunnel_xmit+0x50c/0x930 net/ipv4/ip_tunnel_core.c:82 ip_tunnel_xmit+0x2296/0x2c70 net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c:813 __gre_xmit net/ipv4/ip_gre.c:469 [inline] ipgre_xmit+0x759/0xa60 net/ipv4/ip_gre.c:661 __netdev_start_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:4850 [inline] netdev_start_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:4864 [inline] xmit_one net/core/dev.c:3595 [inline] dev_hard_start_xmit+0x261/0x8c0 net/core/dev.c:3611 __dev_queue_xmit+0x1b97/0x3c90 net/core/dev.c:4261 packet_snd net/packet/af_packet.c:3073 [inline]
The geometry of the bad input packet at tcp_gso_segment:
[ 52.003050][ T8403] skb len=12202 headroom=244 headlen=12093 tailroom=0 [ 52.003050][ T8403] mac=(168,24) mac_len=24 net=(192,52) trans=244 [ 52.003050][ T8403] shinfo(txflags=0 nr_frags=1 gso(size=1552 type=3 segs=0)) [ 52.003050][ T8403] csum(0x60000c7 start=199 offset=1536 ip_summed=3 complete_sw=0 valid=0 level=0)
Mitigate with stricter input validation.
csum_offset: for GSO packets, deduce the correct value from gso_type. This is already done for USO. Extend it to TSO. Let UFO be: udp[46]_ufo_fragment ignores these fields and always computes the checksum in software.
csum_start: finding the real offset requires parsing to the transport header. Do not add a parser, use existing segmentation parsing. Thanks to SKB_GSO_DODGY, that also catches bad packets that are hw offloaded. Again test both TSO and USO. Do not test UFO for the above reason, and do not test UDP tunnel offload.
GSO packet are almost always CHECKSUM_PARTIAL. USO packets may be CHECKSUM_NONE since commit 10154dbded6d6 ("udp: Allow GSO transmit from devices with no checksum offload"), but then still these fields are initialized correctly in udp4_hwcsum/udp6_hwcsum_outgoing. So no need to test for ip_summed == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL first.
This revises an existing fix mentioned in the Fixes tag, which broke small packets with GSO offload, as detected by kselftests.(CVE-2024-43897)
Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.(CVE-2024-43898)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: Fix null pointer deref in dcn20_resource.c
Fixes a hang thats triggered when MPV is run on a DCN401 dGPU:
mpv --hwdec=vaapi --vo=gpu --hwdec-codecs=all
and then enabling fullscreen playback (double click on the video)
The following calltrace will be seen:
[ 181.843989] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000 [ 181.843997] #PF: supervisor instruction fetch in kernel mode [ 181.844003] #PF: error_code(0x0010) - not-present page [ 181.844009] PGD 0 P4D 0 [ 181.844020] Oops: 0010 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI [ 181.844028] CPU: 6 PID: 1892 Comm: gnome-shell Tainted: G W OE 6.5.0-41-generic #41~22.04.2-Ubuntu [ 181.844038] Hardware name: System manufacturer System Product Name/CROSSHAIR VI HERO, BIOS 6302 10/23/2018 [ 181.844044] RIP: 0010:0x0 [ 181.844079] Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at 0xffffffffffffffd6. [ 181.844084] RSP: 0018:ffffb593c2b8f7b0 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 181.844093] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000004 [ 181.844099] RDX: ffffb593c2b8f804 RSI: ffffb593c2b8f7e0 RDI: ffff9e3c8e758400 [ 181.844105] RBP: ffffb593c2b8f7b8 R08: ffffb593c2b8f9c8 R09: ffffb593c2b8f96c [ 181.844110] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffb593c2b8f9c8 [ 181.844115] R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffff9e3c88000000 R15: 0000000000000005 [ 181.844121] FS: 00007c6e323bb5c0(0000) GS:ffff9e3f85f80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 181.844128] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 181.844134] CR2: ffffffffffffffd6 CR3: 0000000140fbe000 CR4: 00000000003506e0 [ 181.844141] Call Trace: [ 181.844146] <TASK> [ 181.844153] ? show_regs+0x6d/0x80 [ 181.844167] ? __die+0x24/0x80 [ 181.844179] ? page_fault_oops+0x99/0x1b0 [ 181.844192] ? do_user_addr_fault+0x31d/0x6b0 [ 181.844204] ? exc_page_fault+0x83/0x1b0 [ 181.844216] ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x27/0x30 [ 181.844237] dcn20_get_dcc_compression_cap+0x23/0x30 [amdgpu] [ 181.845115] amdgpu_dm_plane_validate_dcc.constprop.0+0xe5/0x180 [amdgpu] [ 181.845985] amdgpu_dm_plane_fill_plane_buffer_attributes+0x300/0x580 [amdgpu] [ 181.846848] fill_dc_plane_info_and_addr+0x258/0x350 [amdgpu] [ 181.847734] fill_dc_plane_attributes+0x162/0x350 [amdgpu] [ 181.848748] dm_update_plane_state.constprop.0+0x4e3/0x6b0 [amdgpu] [ 181.849791] ? dm_update_plane_state.constprop.0+0x4e3/0x6b0 [amdgpu] [ 181.850840] amdgpu_dm_atomic_check+0xdfe/0x1760 amdgpu
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
media: xc2028: avoid use-after-free in load_firmware_cb()
syzkaller reported use-after-free in load_firmware_cb() 1. The reason is because the module allocated a struct tuner in tuner_probe(), and then the module initialization failed, the struct tuner was released. A worker which created during module initialization accesses this struct tuner later, it caused use-after-free.
The process is as follows:
task-6504 worker_thread tuner_probe <= alloc dvb_frontend [2] ... request_firmware_nowait <= create a worker ... tuner_remove <= free dvb_frontend ... request_firmware_work_func <= the firmware is ready load_firmware_cb <= but now the dvb_frontend has been freed
To fix the issue, check the dvd_frontend in load_firmware_cb(), if it is null, report a warning and just return.
BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in load_firmware_cb+0x1310/0x17a0
Read of size 8 at addr ffff8000d7ca2308 by task kworker/2:3/6504
Call trace:
load_firmware_cb+0x1310/0x17a0
request_firmware_work_func+0x128/0x220
process_one_work+0x770/0x1824
worker_thread+0x488/0xea0
kthread+0x300/0x430
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
Allocated by task 6504:
kzalloc
tuner_probe+0xb0/0x1430
i2c_device_probe+0x92c/0xaf0
really_probe+0x678/0xcd0
driver_probe_device+0x280/0x370
__device_attach_driver+0x220/0x330
bus_for_each_drv+0x134/0x1c0
__device_attach+0x1f4/0x410
device_initial_probe+0x20/0x30
bus_probe_device+0x184/0x200
device_add+0x924/0x12c0
device_register+0x24/0x30
i2c_new_device+0x4e0/0xc44
v4l2_i2c_new_subdev_board+0xbc/0x290
v4l2_i2c_new_subdev+0xc8/0x104
em28xx_v4l2_init+0x1dd0/0x3770
Freed by task 6504:
kfree+0x238/0x4e4
tuner_remove+0x144/0x1c0
i2c_device_remove+0xc8/0x290
__device_release_driver+0x314/0x5fc
device_release_driver+0x30/0x44
bus_remove_device+0x244/0x490
device_del+0x350/0x900
device_unregister+0x28/0xd0
i2c_unregister_device+0x174/0x1d0
v4l2_device_unregister+0x224/0x380
em28xx_v4l2_init+0x1d90/0x3770
The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff8000d7ca2000
which belongs to the cache kmalloc-2k of size 2048
The buggy address is located 776 bytes inside of
2048-byte region [ffff8000d7ca2000, ffff8000d7ca2800)
The buggy address belongs to the page:
page:ffff7fe00035f280 count:1 mapcount:0 mapping:ffff8000c001f000 index:0x0
flags: 0x7ff800000000100(slab)
raw: 07ff800000000100 ffff7fe00049d880 0000000300000003 ffff8000c001f000
raw: 0000000000000000 0000000080100010 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000
page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
Memory state around the buggy address:
ffff8000d7ca2200: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
ffff8000d7ca2280: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
>ffff8000d7ca2300: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
^
ffff8000d7ca2380: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
ffff8000d7ca2400: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
==================================================================
[2] Actually, it is allocated for struct tuner, and dvb_frontend is inside.(CVE-2024-43900)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: Add null checker before passing variables
Checks null pointer before passing variables to functions.
This fixes 3 NULL_RETURNS issues reported by Coverity.(CVE-2024-43902)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/pm: Fix the null pointer dereference for vega10_hwmgr
Check return value and conduct null pointer handling to avoid null pointer dereference.(CVE-2024-43905)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/admgpu: fix dereferencing null pointer context
When user space sets an invalid ta type, the pointer context will be empty. So it need to check the pointer context before using it(CVE-2024-43906)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu/pm: Fix the null pointer dereference in apply_state_adjust_rules
Check the pointer value to fix potential null pointer dereference(CVE-2024-43907)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu: Fix the null pointer dereference to ras_manager
Check ras_manager before using it(CVE-2024-43908)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu/pm: Fix the null pointer dereference for smu7
optimize the code to avoid pass a null pointer (hwmgr->backend) to function smu7_update_edc_leakage_table.(CVE-2024-43909)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: nl80211: disallow setting special AP channel widths
Setting the AP channel width is meant for use with the normal 20/40/... MHz channel width progression, and switching around in S1G or narrow channels isn't supported. Disallow that.(CVE-2024-43912)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nvme: apple: fix device reference counting
Drivers must call nvme_uninit_ctrl after a successful nvme_init_ctrl. Split the allocation side out to make the error handling boundary easier to navigate. The apple driver had been doing this wrong, leaking the controller device memory on a tagset failure.(CVE-2024-43913)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
md/raid5: avoid BUG_ON() while continue reshape after reassembling
Currently, mdadm support --revert-reshape to abort the reshape while reassembling, as the test 07revert-grow. However, following BUG_ON() can be triggerred by the test:
kernel BUG at drivers/md/raid5.c:6278! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI irq event stamp: 158985 CPU: 6 PID: 891 Comm: md0_reshape Not tainted 6.9.0-03335-g7592a0b0049a #94 RIP: 0010:reshape_request+0x3f1/0xe60 Call Trace: <TASK> raid5_sync_request+0x43d/0x550 md_do_sync+0xb7a/0x2110 md_thread+0x294/0x2b0 kthread+0x147/0x1c0 ret_from_fork+0x59/0x70 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 </TASK>
Root cause is that --revert-reshape update the raid_disks from 5 to 4, while reshape position is still set, and after reassembling the array, reshape position will be read from super block, then during reshape the checking of 'writepos' that is caculated by old reshape position will fail.
Fix this panic the easy way first, by converting the BUG_ON() to WARN_ON(), and stop the reshape if checkings fail.
Noted that mdadm must fix --revert-shape as well, and probably md/raid should enhance metadata validation as well, however this means reassemble will fail and there must be user tools to fix the wrong metadata.(CVE-2024-43914)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: bridge: mcast: wait for previous gc cycles when removing port
syzbot hit a use-after-free1 which is caused because the bridge doesn't make sure that all previous garbage has been collected when removing a port. What happens is: CPU 1 CPU 2 start gc cycle remove port acquire gc lock first wait for lock call br_multicasg_gc() directly acquire lock now but free port the port can be freed while grp timers still running
Make sure all previous gc cycles have finished by using flush_work before freeing the port.
1 BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in br_multicast_port_group_expired+0x4c0/0x550 net/bridge/br_multicast.c:861 Read of size 8 at addr ffff888071d6d000 by task syz.5.1232/9699
CPU: 1 PID: 9699 Comm: syz.5.1232 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc5-syzkaller-00021-g24ca36a562d6 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 06/07/2024 Call Trace: <IRQ> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x116/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:114 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [inline] print_report+0xc3/0x620 mm/kasan/report.c:488 kasan_report+0xd9/0x110 mm/kasan/report.c:601 br_multicast_port_group_expired+0x4c0/0x550 net/bridge/br_multicast.c:861 call_timer_fn+0x1a3/0x610 kernel/time/timer.c:1792 expire_timers kernel/time/timer.c:1843 [inline] __run_timers+0x74b/0xaf0 kernel/time/timer.c:2417 __run_timer_base kernel/time/timer.c:2428 [inline] __run_timer_base kernel/time/timer.c:2421 [inline] run_timer_base+0x111/0x190 kernel/time/timer.c:2437(CVE-2024-44934)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
sctp: Fix null-ptr-deref in reuseport_add_sock().
syzbot reported a null-ptr-deref while accessing sk2->sk_reuseport_cb in reuseport_add_sock(). [0]
The repro first creates a listener with SO_REUSEPORT. Then, it creates another listener on the same port and concurrently closes the first listener.
The second listen() calls reuseport_add_sock() with the first listener as sk2, where sk2->sk_reuseport_cb is not expected to be cleared concurrently, but the close() does clear it by reuseport_detach_sock().
The problem is SCTP does not properly synchronise reuseport_alloc(), reuseport_add_sock(), and reuseport_detach_sock().
The caller of reuseport_alloc() and reuseport_{add,detach}_sock() must provide synchronisation for sockets that are classified into the same reuseport group.
Otherwise, such sockets form multiple identical reuseport groups, and all groups except one would be silently dead.
- Two sockets call listen() concurrently
- No socket in the same group found in sctp_ep_hashtable[]
- Two sockets call reuseport_alloc() and form two reuseport groups
- Only one group hit first in __sctp_rcv_lookup_endpoint() receives incoming packets
Also, the reported null-ptr-deref could occur.
TCP/UDP guarantees that would not happen by holding the hash bucket lock.
Let's apply the locking strategy to __sctp_hash_endpoint() and __sctp_unhash_endpoint().
[0]: Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000002: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000010-0x0000000000000017] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 10230 Comm: syz-executor119 Not tainted 6.10.0-syzkaller-12585-g301927d2d2eb #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 06/27/2024 RIP: 0010:reuseport_add_sock+0x27e/0x5e0 net/core/sock_reuseport.c:350 Code: 00 0f b7 5d 00 bf 01 00 00 00 89 de e8 1b a4 ff f7 83 fb 01 0f 85 a3 01 00 00 e8 6d a0 ff f7 49 8d 7e 12 48 89 f8 48 c1 e8 03 <42> 0f b6 04 28 84 c0 0f 85 4b 02 00 00 41 0f b7 5e 12 49 8d 7e 14 RSP: 0018:ffffc9000b947c98 EFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: 0000000000000002 RBX: ffff8880252ddf98 RCX: ffff888079478000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: 0000000000000012 RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: ffffffff8993e18d R09: 1ffffffff1fef385 R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: fffffbfff1fef386 R12: ffff8880252ddac0 R13: dffffc0000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 00007f24e45b96c0(0000) GS:ffff8880b9300000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007ffcced5f7b8 CR3: 00000000241be000 CR4: 00000000003506f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> __sctp_hash_endpoint net/sctp/input.c:762 [inline] sctp_hash_endpoint+0x52a/0x600 net/sctp/input.c:790 sctp_listen_start net/sctp/socket.c:8570 [inline] sctp_inet_listen+0x767/0xa20 net/sctp/socket.c:8625 __sys_listen_socket net/socket.c:1883 [inline] __sys_listen+0x1b7/0x230 net/socket.c:1894 __do_sys_listen net/socket.c:1902 [inline] __se_sys_listen net/socket.c:1900 [inline] __x64_sys_listen+0x5a/0x70 net/socket.c:1900 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7f24e46039b9 Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 91 1a 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007f24e45b9228 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000032 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f24e468e428 RCX: 00007f24e46039b9 RDX: 00007f24e46039b9 RSI: 0000000000000003 RDI: 0000000000000004 RBP: 00007f24e468e420 R08: 00007f24e45b96c0 R09: 00007f24e45b96c0 R10: 00007f24e45b96c0 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f24e468e42c R13: ---truncated---(CVE-2024-44935)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
fou: remove warn in gue_gro_receive on unsupported protocol
Drop the WARN_ON_ONCE inn gue_gro_receive if the encapsulated type is not known or does not have a GRO handler.
Such a packet is easily constructed. Syzbot generates them and sets off this warning.
Remove the warning as it is expected and not actionable.
The warning was previously reduced from WARN_ON to WARN_ON_ONCE in commit 270136613bf7 ("fou: Do WARN_ON_ONCE in gue_gro_receive for bad proto callbacks").(CVE-2024-44940)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
f2fs: fix to do sanity check on F2FS_INLINE_DATA flag in inode during GC
syzbot reports a f2fs bug as below:
------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/f2fs/inline.c:258! CPU: 1 PID: 34 Comm: kworker/u8:2 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc6-syzkaller-00012-g9e4bc4bcae01 #0 RIP: 0010:f2fs_write_inline_data+0x781/0x790 fs/f2fs/inline.c:258 Call Trace: f2fs_write_single_data_page+0xb65/0x1d60 fs/f2fs/data.c:2834 f2fs_write_cache_pages fs/f2fs/data.c:3133 [inline] __f2fs_write_data_pages fs/f2fs/data.c:3288 [inline] f2fs_write_data_pages+0x1efe/0x3a90 fs/f2fs/data.c:3315 do_writepages+0x35b/0x870 mm/page-writeback.c:2612 __writeback_single_inode+0x165/0x10b0 fs/fs-writeback.c:1650 writeback_sb_inodes+0x905/0x1260 fs/fs-writeback.c:1941 wb_writeback+0x457/0xce0 fs/fs-writeback.c:2117 wb_do_writeback fs/fs-writeback.c:2264 [inline] wb_workfn+0x410/0x1090 fs/fs-writeback.c:2304 process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3254 [inline] process_scheduled_works+0xa12/0x17c0 kernel/workqueue.c:3335 worker_thread+0x86d/0xd70 kernel/workqueue.c:3416 kthread+0x2f2/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:388 ret_from_fork+0x4d/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244
The root cause is: inline_data inode can be fuzzed, so that there may be valid blkaddr in its direct node, once f2fs triggers background GC to migrate the block, it will hit f2fs_bug_on() during dirty page writeback.
Let's add sanity check on F2FS_INLINE_DATA flag in inode during GC, so that, it can forbid migrating inline_data inode's data block for fixing.(CVE-2024-44942)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
kcm: Serialise kcm_sendmsg() for the same socket.
syzkaller reported UAF in kcm_release(). [0]
The scenario is
-
Thread A builds a skb with MSG_MORE and sets kcm->seq_skb.
-
Thread A resumes building skb from kcm->seq_skb but is blocked by sk_stream_wait_memory()
-
Thread B calls sendmsg() concurrently, finishes building kcm->seq_skb and puts the skb to the write queue
-
Thread A faces an error and finally frees skb that is already in the write queue
-
kcm_release() does double-free the skb in the write queue
When a thread is building a MSG_MORE skb, another thread must not touch it.
Let's add a per-sk mutex and serialise kcm_sendmsg().
[0]: BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __skb_unlink include/linux/skbuff.h:2366 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __skb_dequeue include/linux/skbuff.h:2385 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __skb_queue_purge_reason include/linux/skbuff.h:3175 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __skb_queue_purge include/linux/skbuff.h:3181 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in kcm_release+0x170/0x4c8 net/kcm/kcmsock.c:1691 Read of size 8 at addr ffff0000ced0fc80 by task syz-executor329/6167
CPU: 1 PID: 6167 Comm: syz-executor329 Tainted: G B 6.8.0-rc5-syzkaller-g9abbc24128bc #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/25/2024 Call trace: dump_backtrace+0x1b8/0x1e4 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:291 show_stack+0x2c/0x3c arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:298 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0xd0/0x124 lib/dump_stack.c:106 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [inline] print_report+0x178/0x518 mm/kasan/report.c:488 kasan_report+0xd8/0x138 mm/kasan/report.c:601 __asan_report_load8_noabort+0x20/0x2c mm/kasan/report_generic.c:381 __skb_unlink include/linux/skbuff.h:2366 [inline] __skb_dequeue include/linux/skbuff.h:2385 [inline] __skb_queue_purge_reason include/linux/skbuff.h:3175 [inline] __skb_queue_purge include/linux/skbuff.h:3181 [inline] kcm_release+0x170/0x4c8 net/kcm/kcmsock.c:1691 __sock_release net/socket.c:659 [inline] sock_close+0xa4/0x1e8 net/socket.c:1421 __fput+0x30c/0x738 fs/file_table.c:376 ____fput+0x20/0x30 fs/file_table.c:404 task_work_run+0x230/0x2e0 kernel/task_work.c:180 exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:38 [inline] do_exit+0x618/0x1f64 kernel/exit.c:871 do_group_exit+0x194/0x22c kernel/exit.c:1020 get_signal+0x1500/0x15ec kernel/signal.c:2893 do_signal+0x23c/0x3b44 arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c:1249 do_notify_resume+0x74/0x1f4 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:148 exit_to_user_mode_prepare arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:169 [inline] exit_to_user_mode arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:178 [inline] el0_svc+0xac/0x168 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:713 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xfc arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:730 el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:598
Allocated by task 6166: kasan_save_stack mm/kasan/common.c:47 [inline] kasan_save_track+0x40/0x78 mm/kasan/common.c:68 kasan_save_alloc_info+0x70/0x84 mm/kasan/generic.c:626 unpoison_slab_object mm/kasan/common.c:314 [inline] __kasan_slab_alloc+0x74/0x8c mm/kasan/common.c:340 kasan_slab_alloc include/linux/kasan.h:201 [inline] slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3813 [inline] slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3860 [inline] kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x204/0x4c0 mm/slub.c:3903 __alloc_skb+0x19c/0x3d8 net/core/skbuff.c:641 alloc_skb include/linux/skbuff.h:1296 [inline] kcm_sendmsg+0x1d3c/0x2124 net/kcm/kcmsock.c:783 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline] __sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:745 [inline] sock_sendmsg+0x220/0x2c0 net/socket.c:768 splice_to_socket+0x7cc/0xd58 fs/splice.c:889 do_splice_from fs/splice.c:941 [inline] direct_splice_actor+0xec/0x1d8 fs/splice.c:1164 splice_direct_to_actor+0x438/0xa0c fs/splice.c:1108 do_splice_direct_actor ---truncated---(CVE-2024-44946)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
fuse: Initialize beyond-EOF page contents before setting uptodate
fuse_notify_store(), unlike fuse_do_readpage(), does not enable page zeroing (because it can be used to change partial page contents).
So fuse_notify_store() must be more careful to fully initialize page contents (including parts of the page that are beyond end-of-file) before marking the page uptodate.
The current code can leave beyond-EOF page contents uninitialized, which makes these uninitialized page contents visible to userspace via mmap().
This is an information leak, but only affects systems which do not enable init-on-alloc (via CONFIG_INIT_ON_ALLOC_DEFAULT_ON=y or the corresponding kernel command line parameter).(CVE-2024-44947)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu: Forward soft recovery errors to userspace
As we discussed before1, soft recovery should be forwarded to userspace, or we can get into a really bad state where apps will keep submitting hanging command buffers cascading us to a hard reset.
1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/bf23d5ed-9a6b-43e7-84ee-8cbfd0d60f18@froggi.es/ (cherry picked from commit 434967aadbbbe3ad9103cc29e9a327de20fdba01)(CVE-2024-44961)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
binfmt_flat: Fix corruption when not offsetting data start
Commit 04d82a6d0881 ("binfmt_flat: allow not offsetting data start") introduced a RISC-V specific variant of the FLAT format which does not allocate any space for the (obsolete) array of shared library pointers. However, it did not disable the code which initializes the array, resulting in the corruption of sizeof(long) bytes before the DATA segment, generally the end of the TEXT segment.
Introduce MAX_SHARED_LIBS_UPDATE which depends on the state of CONFIG_BINFMT_FLAT_NO_DATA_START_OFFSET to guard the initialization of the shared library pointer region so that it will only be initialized if space is reserved for it.(CVE-2024-44966)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: dsa: bcm_sf2: Fix a possible memory leak in bcm_sf2_mdio_register()
bcm_sf2_mdio_register() calls of_phy_find_device() and then phy_device_remove() in a loop to remove existing PHY devices. of_phy_find_device() eventually calls bus_find_device(), which calls get_device() on the returned struct device * to increment the refcount. The current implementation does not decrement the refcount, which causes memory leak.
This commit adds the missing phy_device_free() call to decrement the refcount via put_device() to balance the refcount.(CVE-2024-44971)
| URL | Type | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"bpftool-6.6.0-41.0.0.48.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-6.6.0-41.0.0.48.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-6.6.0-41.0.0.48.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-6.6.0-41.0.0.48.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-6.6.0-41.0.0.48.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-6.6.0-41.0.0.48.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-6.6.0-41.0.0.48.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-6.6.0-41.0.0.48.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-6.6.0-41.0.0.48.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-6.6.0-41.0.0.48.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-6.6.0-41.0.0.48.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-6.6.0-41.0.0.48.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-41.0.0.48.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-6.6.0-41.0.0.48.oe2403.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-41.0.0.48.oe2403.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-6.6.0-41.0.0.48.oe2403.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"bpftool-6.6.0-41.0.0.48.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-6.6.0-41.0.0.48.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-6.6.0-41.0.0.48.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-6.6.0-41.0.0.48.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-6.6.0-41.0.0.48.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-6.6.0-41.0.0.48.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-6.6.0-41.0.0.48.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-6.6.0-41.0.0.48.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-6.6.0-41.0.0.48.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-6.6.0-41.0.0.48.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-6.6.0-41.0.0.48.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-6.6.0-41.0.0.48.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-41.0.0.48.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-6.6.0-41.0.0.48.oe2403.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-41.0.0.48.oe2403.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:24.03-LTS",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-24.03-LTS"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "6.6.0-41.0.0.48.oe2403"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "High"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbna: ensure the copied buf is NUL terminated\r\n\r\nCurrently, we allocate a nbytes-sized kernel buffer and copy nbytes from\nuserspace to that buffer. Later, we use sscanf on this buffer but we don\u0026apos;t\nensure that the string is terminated inside the buffer, this can lead to\nOOB read when using sscanf. Fix this issue by using memdup_user_nul\ninstead of memdup_user.(CVE-2024-36934)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnilfs2: fix potential kernel bug due to lack of writeback flag waiting\r\n\r\nDestructive writes to a block device on which nilfs2 is mounted can cause\na kernel bug in the folio/page writeback start routine or writeback end\nroutine (__folio_start_writeback in the log below):\r\n\r\n kernel BUG at mm/page-writeback.c:3070!\n Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI\n ...\n RIP: 0010:__folio_start_writeback+0xbaa/0x10e0\n Code: 25 ff 0f 00 00 0f 84 18 01 00 00 e8 40 ca c6 ff e9 17 f6 ff ff\n e8 36 ca c6 ff 4c 89 f7 48 c7 c6 80 c0 12 84 e8 e7 b3 0f 00 90 \u0026lt;0f\u0026gt;\n 0b e8 1f ca c6 ff 4c 89 f7 48 c7 c6 a0 c6 12 84 e8 d0 b3 0f 00\n ...\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n nilfs_segctor_do_construct+0x4654/0x69d0 [nilfs2]\n nilfs_segctor_construct+0x181/0x6b0 [nilfs2]\n nilfs_segctor_thread+0x548/0x11c0 [nilfs2]\n kthread+0x2f0/0x390\n ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\r\n\r\nThis is because when the log writer starts a writeback for segment summary\nblocks or a super root block that use the backing device\u0026apos;s page cache, it\ndoes not wait for the ongoing folio/page writeback, resulting in an\ninconsistent writeback state.\r\n\r\nFix this issue by waiting for ongoing writebacks when putting\nfolios/pages on the backing device into writeback state.(CVE-2024-37078)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nxfrm6: check ip6_dst_idev() return value in xfrm6_get_saddr()\r\n\r\nip6_dst_idev() can return NULL, xfrm6_get_saddr() must act accordingly.\r\n\r\nsyzbot reported:\r\n\r\nOops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000000: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI\nKASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000000007]\nCPU: 1 PID: 12 Comm: kworker/u8:1 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc2-syzkaller-00383-gb8481381d4e2 #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 04/02/2024\nWorkqueue: wg-kex-wg1 wg_packet_handshake_send_worker\n RIP: 0010:xfrm6_get_saddr+0x93/0x130 net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.c:64\nCode: df 48 89 fa 48 c1 ea 03 80 3c 02 00 0f 85 97 00 00 00 4c 8b ab d8 00 00 00 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 4c 89 ea 48 c1 ea 03 \u0026lt;80\u0026gt; 3c 02 00 0f 85 86 00 00 00 4d 8b 6d 00 e8 ca 13 47 01 48 b8 00\nRSP: 0018:ffffc90000117378 EFLAGS: 00010246\nRAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: ffff88807b079dc0 RCX: ffffffff89a0d6d7\nRDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffff89a0d6e9 RDI: ffff88807b079e98\nRBP: ffff88807ad73248 R08: 0000000000000007 R09: fffffffffffff000\nR10: ffff88807b079dc0 R11: 0000000000000007 R12: ffffc90000117480\nR13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000\nFS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880b9300000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: 00007f4586d00440 CR3: 0000000079042000 CR4: 00000000003506f0\nDR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\nDR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n xfrm_get_saddr net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:2452 [inline]\n xfrm_tmpl_resolve_one net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:2481 [inline]\n xfrm_tmpl_resolve+0xa26/0xf10 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:2541\n xfrm_resolve_and_create_bundle+0x140/0x2570 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:2835\n xfrm_bundle_lookup net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:3070 [inline]\n xfrm_lookup_with_ifid+0x4d1/0x1e60 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:3201\n xfrm_lookup net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:3298 [inline]\n xfrm_lookup_route+0x3b/0x200 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:3309\n ip6_dst_lookup_flow+0x15c/0x1d0 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:1256\n send6+0x611/0xd20 drivers/net/wireguard/socket.c:139\n wg_socket_send_skb_to_peer+0xf9/0x220 drivers/net/wireguard/socket.c:178\n wg_socket_send_buffer_to_peer+0x12b/0x190 drivers/net/wireguard/socket.c:200\n wg_packet_send_handshake_initiation+0x227/0x360 drivers/net/wireguard/send.c:40\n wg_packet_handshake_send_worker+0x1c/0x30 drivers/net/wireguard/send.c:51\n process_one_work+0x9fb/0x1b60 kernel/workqueue.c:3231\n process_scheduled_works kernel/workqueue.c:3312 [inline]\n worker_thread+0x6c8/0xf70 kernel/workqueue.c:3393\n kthread+0x2c1/0x3a0 kernel/kthread.c:389\n ret_from_fork+0x45/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244(CVE-2024-40959)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/lima: mask irqs in timeout path before hard reset\r\n\r\nThere is a race condition in which a rendering job might take just long\nenough to trigger the drm sched job timeout handler but also still\ncomplete before the hard reset is done by the timeout handler.\nThis runs into race conditions not expected by the timeout handler.\nIn some very specific cases it currently may result in a refcount\nimbalance on lima_pm_idle, with a stack dump such as:\r\n\r\n[10136.669170] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_devfreq.c:205 lima_devfreq_record_idle+0xa0/0xb0\n...\n[10136.669459] pc : lima_devfreq_record_idle+0xa0/0xb0\n...\n[10136.669628] Call trace:\n[10136.669634] lima_devfreq_record_idle+0xa0/0xb0\n[10136.669646] lima_sched_pipe_task_done+0x5c/0xb0\n[10136.669656] lima_gp_irq_handler+0xa8/0x120\n[10136.669666] __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x48/0x160\n[10136.669679] handle_irq_event+0x4c/0xc0\r\n\r\nWe can prevent that race condition entirely by masking the irqs at the\nbeginning of the timeout handler, at which point we give up on waiting\nfor that job entirely.\nThe irqs will be enabled again at the next hard reset which is already\ndone as a recovery by the timeout handler.(CVE-2024-40976)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nscsi: qedi: Fix crash while reading debugfs attribute\r\n\r\nThe qedi_dbg_do_not_recover_cmd_read() function invokes sprintf() directly\non a __user pointer, which results into the crash.\r\n\r\nTo fix this issue, use a small local stack buffer for sprintf() and then\ncall simple_read_from_buffer(), which in turns make the copy_to_user()\ncall.\r\n\r\nBUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 00007f4801111000\nPGD 8000000864df6067 P4D 8000000864df6067 PUD 864df7067 PMD 846028067 PTE 0\nOops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI\nHardware name: HPE ProLiant DL380 Gen10/ProLiant DL380 Gen10, BIOS U30 06/15/2023\nRIP: 0010:memcpy_orig+0xcd/0x130\nRSP: 0018:ffffb7a18c3ffc40 EFLAGS: 00010202\nRAX: 00007f4801111000 RBX: 00007f4801111000 RCX: 000000000000000f\nRDX: 000000000000000f RSI: ffffffffc0bfd7a0 RDI: 00007f4801111000\nRBP: ffffffffc0bfd7a0 R08: 725f746f6e5f6f64 R09: 3d7265766f636572\nR10: ffffb7a18c3ffd08 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 00007f4881110fff\nR13: 000000007fffffff R14: ffffb7a18c3ffca0 R15: ffffffffc0bfd7af\nFS: 00007f480118a740(0000) GS:ffff98e38af00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: 00007f4801111000 CR3: 0000000864b8e001 CR4: 00000000007706e0\nDR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\nDR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400\nPKRU: 55555554\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n ? __die_body+0x1a/0x60\n ? page_fault_oops+0x183/0x510\n ? exc_page_fault+0x69/0x150\n ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30\n ? memcpy_orig+0xcd/0x130\n vsnprintf+0x102/0x4c0\n sprintf+0x51/0x80\n qedi_dbg_do_not_recover_cmd_read+0x2f/0x50 [qedi 6bcfdeeecdea037da47069eca2ba717c84a77324]\n full_proxy_read+0x50/0x80\n vfs_read+0xa5/0x2e0\n ? folio_add_new_anon_rmap+0x44/0xa0\n ? set_pte_at+0x15/0x30\n ? do_pte_missing+0x426/0x7f0\n ksys_read+0xa5/0xe0\n do_syscall_64+0x58/0x80\n ? __count_memcg_events+0x46/0x90\n ? count_memcg_event_mm+0x3d/0x60\n ? handle_mm_fault+0x196/0x2f0\n ? do_user_addr_fault+0x267/0x890\n ? exc_page_fault+0x69/0x150\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc\nRIP: 0033:0x7f4800f20b4d(CVE-2024-40978)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nfilelock: Remove locks reliably when fcntl/close race is detected\r\n\r\nWhen fcntl_setlk() races with close(), it removes the created lock with\ndo_lock_file_wait().\nHowever, LSMs can allow the first do_lock_file_wait() that created the lock\nwhile denying the second do_lock_file_wait() that tries to remove the lock.\nSeparately, posix_lock_file() could also fail to\nremove a lock due to GFP_KERNEL allocation failure (when splitting a range\nin the middle).\r\n\r\nAfter the bug has been triggered, use-after-free reads will occur in\nlock_get_status() when userspace reads /proc/locks. This can likely be used\nto read arbitrary kernel memory, but can\u0026apos;t corrupt kernel memory.\r\n\r\nFix it by calling locks_remove_posix() instead, which is designed to\nreliably get rid of POSIX locks associated with the given file and\nfiles_struct and is also used by filp_flush().(CVE-2024-41012)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nocfs2: strict bound check before memcmp in ocfs2_xattr_find_entry()\r\n\r\nxattr in ocfs2 maybe \u0026apos;non-indexed\u0026apos;, which saved with additional space\nrequested. It\u0026apos;s better to check if the memory is out of bound before\nmemcmp, although this possibility mainly comes from crafted poisonous\nimages.(CVE-2024-41016)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nASoC: SOF: Intel: hda: fix null deref on system suspend entry\r\n\r\nWhen system enters suspend with an active stream, SOF core\ncalls hw_params_upon_resume(). On Intel platforms with HDA DMA used\nto manage the link DMA, this leads to call chain of\r\n\r\n hda_dsp_set_hw_params_upon_resume()\n -\u0026gt; hda_dsp_dais_suspend()\n -\u0026gt; hda_dai_suspend()\n -\u0026gt; hda_ipc4_post_trigger()\r\n\r\nA bug is hit in hda_dai_suspend() as hda_link_dma_cleanup() is run first,\nwhich clears hext_stream-\u0026gt;link_substream, and then hda_ipc4_post_trigger()\nis called with a NULL snd_pcm_substream pointer.(CVE-2024-41037)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nvfio/pci: Init the count variable in collecting hot-reset devices\r\n\r\nThe count variable is used without initialization, it results in mistakes\nin the device counting and crashes the userspace if the get hot reset info\npath is triggered.(CVE-2024-41052)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nwifi: mac80211: Avoid address calculations via out of bounds array indexing\r\n\r\nreq-\u0026gt;n_channels must be set before req-\u0026gt;channels[] can be used.\r\n\r\nThis patch fixes one of the issues encountered in [1].\r\n\r\n[ 83.964255] UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in net/mac80211/scan.c:364:4\n[ 83.964258] index 0 is out of range for type \u0026apos;struct ieee80211_channel *[]\u0026apos;\n[...]\n[ 83.964264] Call Trace:\n[ 83.964267] \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n[ 83.964269] dump_stack_lvl+0x3f/0xc0\n[ 83.964274] __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0xec/0x110\n[ 83.964278] ieee80211_prep_hw_scan+0x2db/0x4b0\n[ 83.964281] __ieee80211_start_scan+0x601/0x990\n[ 83.964291] nl80211_trigger_scan+0x874/0x980\n[ 83.964295] genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0xe8/0x160\n[ 83.964298] genl_rcv_msg+0x240/0x270\n[...]\r\n\r\n[1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218810(CVE-2024-41071)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnvme-fabrics: use reserved tag for reg read/write command\r\n\r\nIn some scenarios, if too many commands are issued by nvme command in\nthe same time by user tasks, this may exhaust all tags of admin_q. If\na reset (nvme reset or IO timeout) occurs before these commands finish,\nreconnect routine may fail to update nvme regs due to insufficient tags,\nwhich will cause kernel hang forever. In order to workaround this issue,\nmaybe we can let reg_read32()/reg_read64()/reg_write32() use reserved\ntags. This maybe safe for nvmf:\r\n\r\n1. For the disable ctrl path, we will not issue connect command\n2. For the enable ctrl / fw activate path, since connect and reg_xx()\n are called serially.\r\n\r\nSo the reserved tags may still be enough while reg_xx() use reserved tags.(CVE-2024-41082)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nata: libata-core: Fix null pointer dereference on error\r\n\r\nIf the ata_port_alloc() call in ata_host_alloc() fails,\nata_host_release() will get called.\r\n\r\nHowever, the code in ata_host_release() tries to free ata_port struct\nmembers unconditionally, which can lead to the following:\r\n\r\nBUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 0000000000003990\nPGD 0 P4D 0\nOops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI\nCPU: 10 PID: 594 Comm: (udev-worker) Not tainted 6.10.0-rc5 #44\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-2.fc40 04/01/2014\nRIP: 0010:ata_host_release.cold+0x2f/0x6e [libata]\nCode: e4 4d 63 f4 44 89 e2 48 c7 c6 90 ad 32 c0 48 c7 c7 d0 70 33 c0 49 83 c6 0e 41\nRSP: 0018:ffffc90000ebb968 EFLAGS: 00010246\nRAX: 0000000000000041 RBX: ffff88810fb52e78 RCX: 0000000000000000\nRDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff88813b3218c0 RDI: ffff88813b3218c0\nRBP: ffff88810fb52e40 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 6c65725f74736f68\nR10: ffffc90000ebb738 R11: 73692033203a746e R12: 0000000000000004\nR13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000011 R15: 0000000000000006\nFS: 00007f6cc55b9980(0000) GS:ffff88813b300000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: 0000000000003990 CR3: 00000001122a2000 CR4: 0000000000750ef0\nPKRU: 55555554\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n ? __die_body.cold+0x19/0x27\n ? page_fault_oops+0x15a/0x2f0\n ? exc_page_fault+0x7e/0x180\n ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30\n ? ata_host_release.cold+0x2f/0x6e [libata]\n ? ata_host_release.cold+0x2f/0x6e [libata]\n release_nodes+0x35/0xb0\n devres_release_group+0x113/0x140\n ata_host_alloc+0xed/0x120 [libata]\n ata_host_alloc_pinfo+0x14/0xa0 [libata]\n ahci_init_one+0x6c9/0xd20 [ahci]\r\n\r\nDo not access ata_port struct members unconditionally.(CVE-2024-41098)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nice: Fix improper extts handling\r\n\r\nExtts events are disabled and enabled by the application ts2phc.\nHowever, in case where the driver is removed when the application is\nrunning, a specific extts event remains enabled and can cause a kernel\ncrash.\nAs a side effect, when the driver is reloaded and application is started\nagain, remaining extts event for the channel from a previous run will\nkeep firing and the message \u0026quot;extts on unexpected channel\u0026quot; might be\nprinted to the user.\r\n\r\nTo avoid that, extts events shall be disabled when PTP is released.(CVE-2024-42139)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnvmet: fix a possible leak when destroy a ctrl during qp establishment\r\n\r\nIn nvmet_sq_destroy we capture sq-\u0026gt;ctrl early and if it is non-NULL we\nknow that a ctrl was allocated (in the admin connect request handler)\nand we need to release pending AERs, clear ctrl-\u0026gt;sqs and sq-\u0026gt;ctrl\n(for nvme-loop primarily), and drop the final reference on the ctrl.\r\n\r\nHowever, a small window is possible where nvmet_sq_destroy starts (as\na result of the client giving up and disconnecting) concurrently with\nthe nvme admin connect cmd (which may be in an early stage). But *before*\nkill_and_confirm of sq-\u0026gt;ref (i.e. the admin connect managed to get an sq\nlive reference). In this case, sq-\u0026gt;ctrl was allocated however after it was\ncaptured in a local variable in nvmet_sq_destroy.\nThis prevented the final reference drop on the ctrl.\r\n\r\nSolve this by re-capturing the sq-\u0026gt;ctrl after all inflight request has\ncompleted, where for sure sq-\u0026gt;ctrl reference is final, and move forward\nbased on that.\r\n\r\nThis issue was observed in an environment with many hosts connecting\nmultiple ctrls simoutanuosly, creating a delay in allocating a ctrl\nleading up to this race window.(CVE-2024-42152)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ni2c: pnx: Fix potential deadlock warning from del_timer_sync() call in isr\r\n\r\nWhen del_timer_sync() is called in an interrupt context it throws a warning\nbecause of potential deadlock. The timer is used only to exit from\nwait_for_completion() after a timeout so replacing the call with\nwait_for_completion_timeout() allows to remove the problematic timer and\nits related functions altogether.(CVE-2024-42153)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmm: fix crashes from deferred split racing folio migration\r\n\r\nEven on 6.10-rc6, I\u0026apos;ve been seeing elusive \u0026quot;Bad page state\u0026quot;s (often on\nflags when freeing, yet the flags shown are not bad: PG_locked had been\nset and cleared??), and VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page_ref_count(page) == 0)s from\ndeferred_split_scan()\u0026apos;s folio_put(), and a variety of other BUG and WARN\nsymptoms implying double free by deferred split and large folio migration.\r\n\r\n6.7 commit 9bcef5973e31 (\u0026quot;mm: memcg: fix split queue list crash when large\nfolio migration\u0026quot;) was right to fix the memcg-dependent locking broken in\n85ce2c517ade (\u0026quot;memcontrol: only transfer the memcg data for migration\u0026quot;),\nbut missed a subtlety of deferred_split_scan(): it moves folios to its own\nlocal list to work on them without split_queue_lock, during which time\nfolio-\u0026gt;_deferred_list is not empty, but even the \u0026quot;right\u0026quot; lock does nothing\nto secure the folio and the list it is on.\r\n\r\nFortunately, deferred_split_scan() is careful to use folio_try_get(): so\nfolio_migrate_mapping() can avoid the race by folio_undo_large_rmappable()\nwhile the old folio\u0026apos;s reference count is temporarily frozen to 0 - adding\nsuch a freeze in the !mapping case too (originally, folio lock and\nunmapping and no swap cache left an anon folio unreachable, so no freezing\nwas needed there: but the deferred split queue offers a way to reach it).(CVE-2024-42234)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ns390/mm: Add NULL pointer check to crst_table_free() base_crst_free()\r\n\r\ncrst_table_free() used to work with NULL pointers before the conversion\nto ptdescs. Since crst_table_free() can be called with a NULL pointer\n(error handling in crst_table_upgrade() add an explicit check.\r\n\r\nAlso add the same check to base_crst_free() for consistency reasons.\r\n\r\nIn real life this should not happen, since order two GFP_KERNEL\nallocations will not fail, unless FAIL_PAGE_ALLOC is enabled and used.(CVE-2024-42235)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nfirmware: cs_dsp: Validate payload length before processing block\r\n\r\nMove the payload length check in cs_dsp_load() and cs_dsp_coeff_load()\nto be done before the block is processed.\r\n\r\nThe check that the length of a block payload does not exceed the number\nof remaining bytes in the firwmware file buffer was being done near the\nend of the loop iteration. However, some code before that check used the\nlength field without validating it.(CVE-2024-42237)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nfirmware: cs_dsp: Return error if block header overflows file\r\n\r\nReturn an error from cs_dsp_power_up() if a block header is longer\nthan the amount of data left in the file.\r\n\r\nThe previous code in cs_dsp_load() and cs_dsp_load_coeff() would loop\nwhile there was enough data left in the file for a valid region. This\nprotected against overrunning the end of the file data, but it didn\u0026apos;t\nabort the file processing with an error.(CVE-2024-42238)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbpf: Fail bpf_timer_cancel when callback is being cancelled\r\n\r\nGiven a schedule:\r\n\r\ntimer1 cb\t\t\ttimer2 cb\r\n\r\nbpf_timer_cancel(timer2);\tbpf_timer_cancel(timer1);\r\n\r\nBoth bpf_timer_cancel calls would wait for the other callback to finish\nexecuting, introducing a lockup.\r\n\r\nAdd an atomic_t count named \u0026apos;cancelling\u0026apos; in bpf_hrtimer. This keeps\ntrack of all in-flight cancellation requests for a given BPF timer.\nWhenever cancelling a BPF timer, we must check if we have outstanding\ncancellation requests, and if so, we must fail the operation with an\nerror (-EDEADLK) since cancellation is synchronous and waits for the\ncallback to finish executing. This implies that we can enter a deadlock\nsituation involving two or more timer callbacks executing in parallel\nand attempting to cancel one another.\r\n\r\nNote that we avoid incrementing the cancelling counter for the target\ntimer (the one being cancelled) if bpf_timer_cancel is not invoked from\na callback, to avoid spurious errors. The whole point of detecting\ncur-\u0026gt;cancelling and returning -EDEADLK is to not enter a busy wait loop\n(which may or may not lead to a lockup). This does not apply in case the\ncaller is in a non-callback context, the other side can continue to\ncancel as it sees fit without running into errors.\r\n\r\nBackground on prior attempts:\r\n\r\nEarlier versions of this patch used a bool \u0026apos;cancelling\u0026apos; bit and used the\nfollowing pattern under timer-\u0026gt;lock to publish cancellation status.\r\n\r\nlock(t-\u0026gt;lock);\nt-\u0026gt;cancelling = true;\nmb();\nif (cur-\u0026gt;cancelling)\n\treturn -EDEADLK;\nunlock(t-\u0026gt;lock);\nhrtimer_cancel(t-\u0026gt;timer);\nt-\u0026gt;cancelling = false;\r\n\r\nThe store outside the critical section could overwrite a parallel\nrequests t-\u0026gt;cancelling assignment to true, to ensure the parallely\nexecuting callback observes its cancellation status.\r\n\r\nIt would be necessary to clear this cancelling bit once hrtimer_cancel\nis done, but lack of serialization introduced races. Another option was\nexplored where bpf_timer_start would clear the bit when (re)starting the\ntimer under timer-\u0026gt;lock. This would ensure serialized access to the\ncancelling bit, but may allow it to be cleared before in-flight\nhrtimer_cancel has finished executing, such that lockups can occur\nagain.\r\n\r\nThus, we choose an atomic counter to keep track of all outstanding\ncancellation requests and use it to prevent lockups in case callbacks\nattempt to cancel each other while executing in parallel.(CVE-2024-42239)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nx86/bhi: Avoid warning in #DB handler due to BHI mitigation\r\n\r\nWhen BHI mitigation is enabled, if SYSENTER is invoked with the TF flag set\nthen entry_SYSENTER_compat() uses CLEAR_BRANCH_HISTORY and calls the\nclear_bhb_loop() before the TF flag is cleared. This causes the #DB handler\n(exc_debug_kernel()) to issue a warning because single-step is used outside the\nentry_SYSENTER_compat() function.\r\n\r\nTo address this issue, entry_SYSENTER_compat() should use CLEAR_BRANCH_HISTORY\nafter making sure the TF flag is cleared.\r\n\r\nThe problem can be reproduced with the following sequence:\r\n\r\n $ cat sysenter_step.c\n int main()\n { asm(\u0026quot;pushf; pop %ax; bts $8,%ax; push %ax; popf; sysenter\u0026quot;); }\r\n\r\n $ gcc -o sysenter_step sysenter_step.c\r\n\r\n $ ./sysenter_step\n Segmentation fault (core dumped)\r\n\r\nThe program is expected to crash, and the #DB handler will issue a warning.\r\n\r\nKernel log:\r\n\r\n WARNING: CPU: 27 PID: 7000 at arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:1009 exc_debug_kernel+0xd2/0x160\n ...\n RIP: 0010:exc_debug_kernel+0xd2/0x160\n ...\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;#DB\u0026gt;\n ? show_regs+0x68/0x80\n ? __warn+0x8c/0x140\n ? exc_debug_kernel+0xd2/0x160\n ? report_bug+0x175/0x1a0\n ? handle_bug+0x44/0x90\n ? exc_invalid_op+0x1c/0x70\n ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1f/0x30\n ? exc_debug_kernel+0xd2/0x160\n exc_debug+0x43/0x50\n asm_exc_debug+0x1e/0x40\n RIP: 0010:clear_bhb_loop+0x0/0xb0\n ...\n \u0026lt;/#DB\u0026gt;\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n ? entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x8d\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\r\n\r\n [ bp: Massage commit message. ](CVE-2024-42240)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmm/shmem: disable PMD-sized page cache if needed\r\n\r\nFor shmem files, it\u0026apos;s possible that PMD-sized page cache can\u0026apos;t be\nsupported by xarray. For example, 512MB page cache on ARM64 when the base\npage size is 64KB can\u0026apos;t be supported by xarray. It leads to errors as the\nfollowing messages indicate when this sort of xarray entry is split.\r\n\r\nWARNING: CPU: 34 PID: 7578 at lib/xarray.c:1025 xas_split_alloc+0xf8/0x128\nModules linked in: binfmt_misc nft_fib_inet nft_fib_ipv4 nft_fib_ipv6 \\\nnft_fib nft_reject_inet nf_reject_ipv4 nf_reject_ipv6 nft_reject \\\nnft_ct nft_chain_nat nf_nat nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4 \\\nip_set rfkill nf_tables nfnetlink vfat fat virtio_balloon drm fuse xfs \\\nlibcrc32c crct10dif_ce ghash_ce sha2_ce sha256_arm64 sha1_ce virtio_net \\\nnet_failover virtio_console virtio_blk failover dimlib virtio_mmio\nCPU: 34 PID: 7578 Comm: test Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W 6.10.0-rc5-gavin+ #9\nHardware name: QEMU KVM Virtual Machine, BIOS edk2-20240524-1.el9 05/24/2024\npstate: 83400005 (Nzcv daif +PAN -UAO +TCO +DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)\npc : xas_split_alloc+0xf8/0x128\nlr : split_huge_page_to_list_to_order+0x1c4/0x720\nsp : ffff8000882af5f0\nx29: ffff8000882af5f0 x28: ffff8000882af650 x27: ffff8000882af768\nx26: 0000000000000cc0 x25: 000000000000000d x24: ffff00010625b858\nx23: ffff8000882af650 x22: ffffffdfc0900000 x21: 0000000000000000\nx20: 0000000000000000 x19: ffffffdfc0900000 x18: 0000000000000000\nx17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000018000000000 x15: 52f8004000000000\nx14: 0000e00000000000 x13: 0000000000002000 x12: 0000000000000020\nx11: 52f8000000000000 x10: 52f8e1c0ffff6000 x9 : ffffbeb9619a681c\nx8 : 0000000000000003 x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : ffff00010b02ddb0\nx5 : ffffbeb96395e378 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000cc0\nx2 : 000000000000000d x1 : 000000000000000c x0 : 0000000000000000\nCall trace:\n xas_split_alloc+0xf8/0x128\n split_huge_page_to_list_to_order+0x1c4/0x720\n truncate_inode_partial_folio+0xdc/0x160\n shmem_undo_range+0x2bc/0x6a8\n shmem_fallocate+0x134/0x430\n vfs_fallocate+0x124/0x2e8\n ksys_fallocate+0x4c/0xa0\n __arm64_sys_fallocate+0x24/0x38\n invoke_syscall.constprop.0+0x7c/0xd8\n do_el0_svc+0xb4/0xd0\n el0_svc+0x44/0x1d8\n el0t_64_sync_handler+0x134/0x150\n el0t_64_sync+0x17c/0x180\r\n\r\nFix it by disabling PMD-sized page cache when HPAGE_PMD_ORDER is larger\nthan MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER. As Matthew Wilcox pointed, the page cache in a\nshmem file isn\u0026apos;t represented by a multi-index entry and doesn\u0026apos;t have this\nlimitation when the xarry entry is split until commit 6b24ca4a1a8d (\u0026quot;mm:\nUse multi-index entries in the page cache\u0026quot;).(CVE-2024-42241)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmm/filemap: make MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER acceptable to xarray\r\n\r\nPatch series \u0026quot;mm/filemap: Limit page cache size to that supported by\nxarray\u0026quot;, v2.\r\n\r\nCurrently, xarray can\u0026apos;t support arbitrary page cache size. More details\ncan be found from the WARN_ON() statement in xas_split_alloc(). In our\ntest whose code is attached below, we hit the WARN_ON() on ARM64 system\nwhere the base page size is 64KB and huge page size is 512MB. The issue\nwas reported long time ago and some discussions on it can be found here\n[1].\r\n\r\n[1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-xfs/msg75404.html\r\n\r\nIn order to fix the issue, we need to adjust MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER to one\nsupported by xarray and avoid PMD-sized page cache if needed. The code\nchanges are suggested by David Hildenbrand.\r\n\r\nPATCH[1] adjusts MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER to that supported by xarray\nPATCH[2-3] avoids PMD-sized page cache in the synchronous readahead path\nPATCH[4] avoids PMD-sized page cache for shmem files if needed\r\n\r\nTest program\n============\n# cat test.c\n#define _GNU_SOURCE\n#include \u0026lt;stdio.h\u0026gt;\n#include \u0026lt;stdlib.h\u0026gt;\n#include \u0026lt;unistd.h\u0026gt;\n#include \u0026lt;string.h\u0026gt;\n#include \u0026lt;fcntl.h\u0026gt;\n#include \u0026lt;errno.h\u0026gt;\n#include \u0026lt;sys/syscall.h\u0026gt;\n#include \u0026lt;sys/mman.h\u0026gt;\r\n\r\n#define TEST_XFS_FILENAME\t\u0026quot;/tmp/data\u0026quot;\n#define TEST_SHMEM_FILENAME\t\u0026quot;/dev/shm/data\u0026quot;\n#define TEST_MEM_SIZE\t\t0x20000000\r\n\r\nint main(int argc, char **argv)\n{\n\tconst char *filename;\n\tint fd = 0;\n\tvoid *buf = (void *)-1, *p;\n\tint pgsize = getpagesize();\n\tint ret;\r\n\r\n\tif (pgsize != 0x10000) {\n\t\tfprintf(stderr, \u0026quot;64KB base page size is required\\n\u0026quot;);\n\t\treturn -EPERM;\n\t}\r\n\r\n\tsystem(\u0026quot;echo force \u0026gt; /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/shmem_enabled\u0026quot;);\n\tsystem(\u0026quot;rm -fr /tmp/data\u0026quot;);\n\tsystem(\u0026quot;rm -fr /dev/shm/data\u0026quot;);\n\tsystem(\u0026quot;echo 1 \u0026gt; /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches\u0026quot;);\r\n\r\n\t/* Open xfs or shmem file */\n\tfilename = TEST_XFS_FILENAME;\n\tif (argc \u0026gt; 1 \u0026amp;\u0026amp; !strcmp(argv[1], \u0026quot;shmem\u0026quot;))\n\t\tfilename = TEST_SHMEM_FILENAME;\r\n\r\n\tfd = open(filename, O_CREAT | O_RDWR | O_TRUNC);\n\tif (fd \u0026lt; 0) {\n\t\tfprintf(stderr, \u0026quot;Unable to open \u0026lt;%s\u0026gt;\\n\u0026quot;, filename);\n\t\treturn -EIO;\n\t}\r\n\r\n\t/* Extend file size */\n\tret = ftruncate(fd, TEST_MEM_SIZE);\n\tif (ret) {\n\t\tfprintf(stderr, \u0026quot;Error %d to ftruncate()\\n\u0026quot;, ret);\n\t\tgoto cleanup;\n\t}\r\n\r\n\t/* Create VMA */\n\tbuf = mmap(NULL, TEST_MEM_SIZE,\n\t\t PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);\n\tif (buf == (void *)-1) {\n\t\tfprintf(stderr, \u0026quot;Unable to mmap \u0026lt;%s\u0026gt;\\n\u0026quot;, filename);\n\t\tgoto cleanup;\n\t}\r\n\r\n\tfprintf(stdout, \u0026quot;mapped buffer at 0x%p\\n\u0026quot;, buf);\n\tret = madvise(buf, TEST_MEM_SIZE, MADV_HUGEPAGE);\n if (ret) {\n\t\tfprintf(stderr, \u0026quot;Unable to madvise(MADV_HUGEPAGE)\\n\u0026quot;);\n\t\tgoto cleanup;\n\t}\r\n\r\n\t/* Populate VMA */\n\tret = madvise(buf, TEST_MEM_SIZE, MADV_POPULATE_WRITE);\n\tif (ret) {\n\t\tfprintf(stderr, \u0026quot;Error %d to madvise(MADV_POPULATE_WRITE)\\n\u0026quot;, ret);\n\t\tgoto cleanup;\n\t}\r\n\r\n\t/* Punch the file to enforce xarray split */\n\tret = fallocate(fd, FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE | FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE,\n \t\tTEST_MEM_SIZE - pgsize, pgsize);\n\tif (ret)\n\t\tfprintf(stderr, \u0026quot;Error %d to fallocate()\\n\u0026quot;, ret);\r\n\r\ncleanup:\n\tif (buf != (void *)-1)\n\t\tmunmap(buf, TEST_MEM_SIZE);\n\tif (fd \u0026gt; 0)\n\t\tclose(fd);\r\n\r\n\treturn 0;\n}\r\n\r\n# gcc test.c -o test\n# cat /proc/1/smaps | grep KernelPageSize | head -n 1\nKernelPageSize: 64 kB\n# ./test shmem\n :\n------------[ cut here ]------------\nWARNING: CPU: 17 PID: 5253 at lib/xarray.c:1025 xas_split_alloc+0xf8/0x128\nModules linked in: nft_fib_inet nft_fib_ipv4 nft_fib_ipv6 nft_fib \\\nnft_reject_inet nf_reject_ipv4 nf_reject_ipv6 nft_reject nft_ct \\\nnft_chain_nat nf_nat nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4 \\\nip_set nf_tables rfkill nfnetlink vfat fat virtio_balloon \\\ndrm fuse xfs libcrc32c crct10dif_ce ghash_ce sha2_ce sha256_arm64 \\\nvirtio_net sha1_ce net_failover failover virtio_console virtio_blk \\\ndimlib virtio_mmio\nCPU: 17 PID: 5253 Comm: test Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W 6.10.0-rc5-gavin+ #12\nHardware name: QEMU KVM Virtual Machine, BIOS edk2-20240524-1.el9 05/24/2024\npstate: 83400005 (Nzcv daif +PAN -UAO +TC\n---truncated---(CVE-2024-42243)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ntty: serial: ma35d1: Add a NULL check for of_node\r\n\r\nThe pdev-\u0026gt;dev.of_node can be NULL if the \u0026quot;serial\u0026quot; node is absent.\nAdd a NULL check to return an error in such cases.(CVE-2024-42248)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ncachefiles: add missing lock protection when polling\r\n\r\nAdd missing lock protection in poll routine when iterating xarray,\notherwise:\r\n\r\nEven with RCU read lock held, only the slot of the radix tree is\nensured to be pinned there, while the data structure (e.g. struct\ncachefiles_req) stored in the slot has no such guarantee. The poll\nroutine will iterate the radix tree and dereference cachefiles_req\naccordingly. Thus RCU read lock is not adequate in this case and\nspinlock is needed here.(CVE-2024-42250)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ngpio: pca953x: fix pca953x_irq_bus_sync_unlock race\r\n\r\nEnsure that `i2c_lock\u0026apos; is held when setting interrupt latch and mask in\npca953x_irq_bus_sync_unlock() in order to avoid races.\r\n\r\nThe other (non-probe) call site pca953x_gpio_set_multiple() ensures the\nlock is held before calling pca953x_write_regs().\r\n\r\nThe problem occurred when a request raced against irq_bus_sync_unlock()\napproximately once per thousand reboots on an i.MX8MP based system.\r\n\r\n * Normal case\r\n\r\n 0-0022: write register AI|3a {03,02,00,00,01} Input latch P0\n 0-0022: write register AI|49 {fc,fd,ff,ff,fe} Interrupt mask P0\n 0-0022: write register AI|08 {ff,00,00,00,00} Output P3\n 0-0022: write register AI|12 {fc,00,00,00,00} Config P3\r\n\r\n * Race case\r\n\r\n 0-0022: write register AI|08 {ff,00,00,00,00} Output P3\n 0-0022: write register AI|08 {03,02,00,00,01} *** Wrong register ***\n 0-0022: write register AI|12 {fc,00,00,00,00} Config P3\n 0-0022: write register AI|49 {fc,fd,ff,ff,fe} Interrupt mask P0(CVE-2024-42253)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmm: huge_memory: use !CONFIG_64BIT to relax huge page alignment on 32 bit machines\r\n\r\nYves-Alexis Perez reported commit 4ef9ad19e176 (\u0026quot;mm: huge_memory: don\u0026apos;t\nforce huge page alignment on 32 bit\u0026quot;) didn\u0026apos;t work for x86_32 [1]. It is\nbecause x86_32 uses CONFIG_X86_32 instead of CONFIG_32BIT.\r\n\r\n!CONFIG_64BIT should cover all 32 bit machines.\r\n\r\n[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/CAHbLzkr1LwH3pcTgM+aGQ31ip2bKqiqEQ8=FQB+t2c3dhNKNHA@mail.gmail.com/(CVE-2024-42258)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/i915/gem: Fix Virtual Memory mapping boundaries calculation\r\n\r\nCalculating the size of the mapped area as the lesser value\nbetween the requested size and the actual size does not consider\nthe partial mapping offset. This can cause page fault access.\r\n\r\nFix the calculation of the starting and ending addresses, the\ntotal size is now deduced from the difference between the end and\nstart addresses.\r\n\r\nAdditionally, the calculations have been rewritten in a clearer\nand more understandable form.\r\n\r\n[Joonas: Add Requires: tag]\nRequires: 60a2066c5005 (\u0026quot;drm/i915/gem: Adjust vma offset for framebuffer mmap offset\u0026quot;)\n(cherry picked from commit 97b6784753da06d9d40232328efc5c5367e53417)(CVE-2024-42259)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet/iucv: fix use after free in iucv_sock_close()\r\n\r\niucv_sever_path() is called from process context and from bh context.\niucv-\u0026gt;path is used as indicator whether somebody else is taking care of\nsevering the path (or it is already removed / never existed).\nThis needs to be done with atomic compare and swap, otherwise there is a\nsmall window where iucv_sock_close() will try to work with a path that has\nalready been severed and freed by iucv_callback_connrej() called by\niucv_tasklet_fn().\r\n\r\nExample:\n[452744.123844] Call Trace:\n[452744.123845] ([\u0026lt;0000001e87f03880\u0026gt;] 0x1e87f03880)\n[452744.123966] [\u0026lt;00000000d593001e\u0026gt;] iucv_path_sever+0x96/0x138\n[452744.124330] [\u0026lt;000003ff801ddbca\u0026gt;] iucv_sever_path+0xc2/0xd0 [af_iucv]\n[452744.124336] [\u0026lt;000003ff801e01b6\u0026gt;] iucv_sock_close+0xa6/0x310 [af_iucv]\n[452744.124341] [\u0026lt;000003ff801e08cc\u0026gt;] iucv_sock_release+0x3c/0xd0 [af_iucv]\n[452744.124345] [\u0026lt;00000000d574794e\u0026gt;] __sock_release+0x5e/0xe8\n[452744.124815] [\u0026lt;00000000d5747a0c\u0026gt;] sock_close+0x34/0x48\n[452744.124820] [\u0026lt;00000000d5421642\u0026gt;] __fput+0xba/0x268\n[452744.124826] [\u0026lt;00000000d51b382c\u0026gt;] task_work_run+0xbc/0xf0\n[452744.124832] [\u0026lt;00000000d5145710\u0026gt;] do_notify_resume+0x88/0x90\n[452744.124841] [\u0026lt;00000000d5978096\u0026gt;] system_call+0xe2/0x2c8\n[452744.125319] Last Breaking-Event-Address:\n[452744.125321] [\u0026lt;00000000d5930018\u0026gt;] iucv_path_sever+0x90/0x138\n[452744.125324]\n[452744.125325] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt\r\n\r\nNote that bh_lock_sock() is not serializing the tasklet context against\nprocess context, because the check for sock_owned_by_user() and\ncorresponding handling is missing.\r\n\r\nIdeas for a future clean-up patch:\nA) Correct usage of bh_lock_sock() in tasklet context, as described in\nRe-enqueue, if needed. This may require adding return values to the\ntasklet functions and thus changes to all users of iucv.\r\n\r\nB) Change iucv tasklet into worker and use only lock_sock() in af_iucv.(CVE-2024-42271)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nsched: act_ct: take care of padding in struct zones_ht_key\r\n\r\nBlamed commit increased lookup key size from 2 bytes to 16 bytes,\nbecause zones_ht_key got a struct net pointer.\r\n\r\nMake sure rhashtable_lookup() is not using the padding bytes\nwhich are not initialized.\r\n\r\n BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in rht_ptr_rcu include/linux/rhashtable.h:376 [inline]\n BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in __rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:607 [inline]\n BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:646 [inline]\n BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in rhashtable_lookup_fast include/linux/rhashtable.h:672 [inline]\n BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in tcf_ct_flow_table_get+0x611/0x2260 net/sched/act_ct.c:329\n rht_ptr_rcu include/linux/rhashtable.h:376 [inline]\n __rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:607 [inline]\n rhashtable_lookup include/linux/rhashtable.h:646 [inline]\n rhashtable_lookup_fast include/linux/rhashtable.h:672 [inline]\n tcf_ct_flow_table_get+0x611/0x2260 net/sched/act_ct.c:329\n tcf_ct_init+0xa67/0x2890 net/sched/act_ct.c:1408\n tcf_action_init_1+0x6cc/0xb30 net/sched/act_api.c:1425\n tcf_action_init+0x458/0xf00 net/sched/act_api.c:1488\n tcf_action_add net/sched/act_api.c:2061 [inline]\n tc_ctl_action+0x4be/0x19d0 net/sched/act_api.c:2118\n rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x12fc/0x1410 net/core/rtnetlink.c:6647\n netlink_rcv_skb+0x375/0x650 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2550\n rtnetlink_rcv+0x34/0x40 net/core/rtnetlink.c:6665\n netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1331 [inline]\n netlink_unicast+0xf52/0x1260 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1357\n netlink_sendmsg+0x10da/0x11e0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1901\n sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]\n __sock_sendmsg+0x30f/0x380 net/socket.c:745\n ____sys_sendmsg+0x877/0xb60 net/socket.c:2597\n ___sys_sendmsg+0x28d/0x3c0 net/socket.c:2651\n __sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2680 [inline]\n __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2689 [inline]\n __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2687 [inline]\n __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x307/0x4a0 net/socket.c:2687\n x64_sys_call+0x2dd6/0x3c10 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:47\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xcd/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f\r\n\r\nLocal variable key created at:\n tcf_ct_flow_table_get+0x4a/0x2260 net/sched/act_ct.c:324\n tcf_ct_init+0xa67/0x2890 net/sched/act_ct.c:1408(CVE-2024-42272)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnvme-pci: add missing condition check for existence of mapped data\r\n\r\nnvme_map_data() is called when request has physical segments, hence\nthe nvme_unmap_data() should have same condition to avoid dereference.(CVE-2024-42276)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\niommu: sprd: Avoid NULL deref in sprd_iommu_hw_en\r\n\r\nIn sprd_iommu_cleanup() before calling function sprd_iommu_hw_en()\ndom-\u0026gt;sdev is equal to NULL, which leads to null dereference.\r\n\r\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2024-42277)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nspi: microchip-core: ensure TX and RX FIFOs are empty at start of a transfer\r\n\r\nWhile transmitting with rx_len == 0, the RX FIFO is not going to be\nemptied in the interrupt handler. A subsequent transfer could then\nread crap from the previous transfer out of the RX FIFO into the\nstart RX buffer. The core provides a register that will empty the RX and\nTX FIFOs, so do that before each transfer.(CVE-2024-42279)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nice: Add a per-VF limit on number of FDIR filters\r\n\r\nWhile the iavf driver adds a s/w limit (128) on the number of FDIR\nfilters that the VF can request, a malicious VF driver can request more\nthan that and exhaust the resources for other VFs.\r\n\r\nAdd a similar limit in ice.(CVE-2024-42291)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nblock: fix deadlock between sd_remove \u0026amp; sd_release\r\n\r\nOur test report the following hung task:\r\n\r\n[ 2538.459400] INFO: task \u0026quot;kworker/0:0\u0026quot;:7 blocked for more than 188 seconds.\n[ 2538.459427] Call trace:\n[ 2538.459430] __switch_to+0x174/0x338\n[ 2538.459436] __schedule+0x628/0x9c4\n[ 2538.459442] schedule+0x7c/0xe8\n[ 2538.459447] schedule_preempt_disabled+0x24/0x40\n[ 2538.459453] __mutex_lock+0x3ec/0xf04\n[ 2538.459456] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x14/0x24\n[ 2538.459459] mutex_lock+0x30/0xd8\n[ 2538.459462] del_gendisk+0xdc/0x350\n[ 2538.459466] sd_remove+0x30/0x60\n[ 2538.459470] device_release_driver_internal+0x1c4/0x2c4\n[ 2538.459474] device_release_driver+0x18/0x28\n[ 2538.459478] bus_remove_device+0x15c/0x174\n[ 2538.459483] device_del+0x1d0/0x358\n[ 2538.459488] __scsi_remove_device+0xa8/0x198\n[ 2538.459493] scsi_forget_host+0x50/0x70\n[ 2538.459497] scsi_remove_host+0x80/0x180\n[ 2538.459502] usb_stor_disconnect+0x68/0xf4\n[ 2538.459506] usb_unbind_interface+0xd4/0x280\n[ 2538.459510] device_release_driver_internal+0x1c4/0x2c4\n[ 2538.459514] device_release_driver+0x18/0x28\n[ 2538.459518] bus_remove_device+0x15c/0x174\n[ 2538.459523] device_del+0x1d0/0x358\n[ 2538.459528] usb_disable_device+0x84/0x194\n[ 2538.459532] usb_disconnect+0xec/0x300\n[ 2538.459537] hub_event+0xb80/0x1870\n[ 2538.459541] process_scheduled_works+0x248/0x4dc\n[ 2538.459545] worker_thread+0x244/0x334\n[ 2538.459549] kthread+0x114/0x1bc\r\n\r\n[ 2538.461001] INFO: task \u0026quot;fsck.\u0026quot;:15415 blocked for more than 188 seconds.\n[ 2538.461014] Call trace:\n[ 2538.461016] __switch_to+0x174/0x338\n[ 2538.461021] __schedule+0x628/0x9c4\n[ 2538.461025] schedule+0x7c/0xe8\n[ 2538.461030] blk_queue_enter+0xc4/0x160\n[ 2538.461034] blk_mq_alloc_request+0x120/0x1d4\n[ 2538.461037] scsi_execute_cmd+0x7c/0x23c\n[ 2538.461040] ioctl_internal_command+0x5c/0x164\n[ 2538.461046] scsi_set_medium_removal+0x5c/0xb0\n[ 2538.461051] sd_release+0x50/0x94\n[ 2538.461054] blkdev_put+0x190/0x28c\n[ 2538.461058] blkdev_release+0x28/0x40\n[ 2538.461063] __fput+0xf8/0x2a8\n[ 2538.461066] __fput_sync+0x28/0x5c\n[ 2538.461070] __arm64_sys_close+0x84/0xe8\n[ 2538.461073] invoke_syscall+0x58/0x114\n[ 2538.461078] el0_svc_common+0xac/0xe0\n[ 2538.461082] do_el0_svc+0x1c/0x28\n[ 2538.461087] el0_svc+0x38/0x68\n[ 2538.461090] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x68/0xbc\n[ 2538.461093] el0t_64_sync+0x1a8/0x1ac\r\n\r\n T1:\t\t\t\tT2:\n sd_remove\n del_gendisk\n __blk_mark_disk_dead\n blk_freeze_queue_start\n ++q-\u0026gt;mq_freeze_depth\n \t\t\t\tbdev_release\n \t\t\t\tmutex_lock(\u0026amp;disk-\u0026gt;open_mutex)\n \t\t\t\tsd_release\n \t\t\t\tscsi_execute_cmd\n \t\t\t\tblk_queue_enter\n \t\t\t\twait_event(!q-\u0026gt;mq_freeze_depth)\n mutex_lock(\u0026amp;disk-\u0026gt;open_mutex)\r\n\r\nSCSI does not set GD_OWNS_QUEUE, so QUEUE_FLAG_DYING is not set in\nthis scenario. This is a classic ABBA deadlock. To fix the deadlock,\nmake sure we don\u0026apos;t try to acquire disk-\u0026gt;open_mutex after freezing\nthe queue.(CVE-2024-42294)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nf2fs: fix return value of f2fs_convert_inline_inode()\r\n\r\nIf device is readonly, make f2fs_convert_inline_inode()\nreturn EROFS instead of zero, otherwise it may trigger\npanic during writeback of inline inode\u0026apos;s dirty page as\nbelow:\r\n\r\n f2fs_write_single_data_page+0xbb6/0x1e90 fs/f2fs/data.c:2888\n f2fs_write_cache_pages fs/f2fs/data.c:3187 [inline]\n __f2fs_write_data_pages fs/f2fs/data.c:3342 [inline]\n f2fs_write_data_pages+0x1efe/0x3a90 fs/f2fs/data.c:3369\n do_writepages+0x359/0x870 mm/page-writeback.c:2634\n filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x125/0x180 mm/filemap.c:397\n __filemap_fdatawrite_range mm/filemap.c:430 [inline]\n file_write_and_wait_range+0x1aa/0x290 mm/filemap.c:788\n f2fs_do_sync_file+0x68a/0x1ae0 fs/f2fs/file.c:276\n generic_write_sync include/linux/fs.h:2806 [inline]\n f2fs_file_write_iter+0x7bd/0x24e0 fs/f2fs/file.c:4977\n call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2114 [inline]\n new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:497 [inline]\n vfs_write+0xa72/0xc90 fs/read_write.c:590\n ksys_write+0x1a0/0x2c0 fs/read_write.c:643\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f(CVE-2024-42296)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nASoC: fsl: fsl_qmc_audio: Check devm_kasprintf() returned value\r\n\r\ndevm_kasprintf() can return a NULL pointer on failure but this returned\nvalue is not checked.\r\n\r\nFix this lack and check the returned value.(CVE-2024-42298)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmedia: imx-pxp: Fix ERR_PTR dereference in pxp_probe()\r\n\r\ndevm_regmap_init_mmio() can fail, add a check and bail out in case of\nerror.(CVE-2024-42303)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ncifs: fix potential null pointer use in destroy_workqueue in init_cifs error path\r\n\r\nDan Carpenter reported a Smack static checker warning:\n fs/smb/client/cifsfs.c:1981 init_cifs()\n error: we previously assumed \u0026apos;serverclose_wq\u0026apos; could be null (see line 1895)\r\n\r\nThe patch which introduced the serverclose workqueue used the wrong\noredering in error paths in init_cifs() for freeing it on errors.(CVE-2024-42307)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbtrfs: fix extent map use-after-free when adding pages to compressed bio\r\n\r\nAt add_ra_bio_pages() we are accessing the extent map to calculate\n\u0026apos;add_size\u0026apos; after we dropped our reference on the extent map, resulting\nin a use-after-free. Fix this by computing \u0026apos;add_size\u0026apos; before dropping our\nextent map reference.(CVE-2024-42314)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nexfat: fix potential deadlock on __exfat_get_dentry_set\r\n\r\nWhen accessing a file with more entries than ES_MAX_ENTRY_NUM, the bh-array\nis allocated in __exfat_get_entry_set. The problem is that the bh-array is\nallocated with GFP_KERNEL. It does not make sense. In the following cases,\na deadlock for sbi-\u0026gt;s_lock between the two processes may occur.\r\n\r\n CPU0 CPU1\n ---- ----\n kswapd\n balance_pgdat\n lock(fs_reclaim)\n exfat_iterate\n lock(\u0026amp;sbi-\u0026gt;s_lock)\n exfat_readdir\n exfat_get_uniname_from_ext_entry\n exfat_get_dentry_set\n __exfat_get_dentry_set\n kmalloc_array\n ...\n lock(fs_reclaim)\n ...\n evict\n exfat_evict_inode\n lock(\u0026amp;sbi-\u0026gt;s_lock)\r\n\r\nTo fix this, let\u0026apos;s allocate bh-array with GFP_NOFS.(CVE-2024-42315)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmm/mglru: fix div-by-zero in vmpressure_calc_level()\r\n\r\nevict_folios() uses a second pass to reclaim folios that have gone through\npage writeback and become clean before it finishes the first pass, since\nfolio_rotate_reclaimable() cannot handle those folios due to the\nisolation.\r\n\r\nThe second pass tries to avoid potential double counting by deducting\nscan_control-\u0026gt;nr_scanned. However, this can result in underflow of\nnr_scanned, under a condition where shrink_folio_list() does not increment\nnr_scanned, i.e., when folio_trylock() fails.\r\n\r\nThe underflow can cause the divisor, i.e., scale=scanned+reclaimed in\nvmpressure_calc_level(), to become zero, resulting in the following crash:\r\n\r\n [exception RIP: vmpressure_work_fn+101]\n process_one_work at ffffffffa3313f2b\r\n\r\nSince scan_control-\u0026gt;nr_scanned has no established semantics, the potential\ndouble counting has minimal risks. Therefore, fix the problem by not\ndeducting scan_control-\u0026gt;nr_scanned in evict_folios().(CVE-2024-42316)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmm/huge_memory: avoid PMD-size page cache if needed\r\n\r\nxarray can\u0026apos;t support arbitrary page cache size. the largest and supported\npage cache size is defined as MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER by commit 099d90642a71\n(\u0026quot;mm/filemap: make MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER acceptable to xarray\u0026quot;). However,\nit\u0026apos;s possible to have 512MB page cache in the huge memory\u0026apos;s collapsing\npath on ARM64 system whose base page size is 64KB. 512MB page cache is\nbreaking the limitation and a warning is raised when the xarray entry is\nsplit as shown in the following example.\r\n\r\n[root@dhcp-10-26-1-207 ~]# cat /proc/1/smaps | grep KernelPageSize\nKernelPageSize: 64 kB\n[root@dhcp-10-26-1-207 ~]# cat /tmp/test.c\n :\nint main(int argc, char **argv)\n{\n\tconst char *filename = TEST_XFS_FILENAME;\n\tint fd = 0;\n\tvoid *buf = (void *)-1, *p;\n\tint pgsize = getpagesize();\n\tint ret = 0;\r\n\r\n\tif (pgsize != 0x10000) {\n\t\tfprintf(stdout, \u0026quot;System with 64KB base page size is required!\\n\u0026quot;);\n\t\treturn -EPERM;\n\t}\r\n\r\n\tsystem(\u0026quot;echo 0 \u0026gt; /sys/devices/virtual/bdi/253:0/read_ahead_kb\u0026quot;);\n\tsystem(\u0026quot;echo 1 \u0026gt; /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches\u0026quot;);\r\n\r\n\t/* Open the xfs file */\n\tfd = open(filename, O_RDONLY);\n\tassert(fd \u0026gt; 0);\r\n\r\n\t/* Create VMA */\n\tbuf = mmap(NULL, TEST_MEM_SIZE, PROT_READ, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);\n\tassert(buf != (void *)-1);\n\tfprintf(stdout, \u0026quot;mapped buffer at 0x%p\\n\u0026quot;, buf);\r\n\r\n\t/* Populate VMA */\n\tret = madvise(buf, TEST_MEM_SIZE, MADV_NOHUGEPAGE);\n\tassert(ret == 0);\n\tret = madvise(buf, TEST_MEM_SIZE, MADV_POPULATE_READ);\n\tassert(ret == 0);\r\n\r\n\t/* Collapse VMA */\n\tret = madvise(buf, TEST_MEM_SIZE, MADV_HUGEPAGE);\n\tassert(ret == 0);\n\tret = madvise(buf, TEST_MEM_SIZE, MADV_COLLAPSE);\n\tif (ret) {\n\t\tfprintf(stdout, \u0026quot;Error %d to madvise(MADV_COLLAPSE)\\n\u0026quot;, errno);\n\t\tgoto out;\n\t}\r\n\r\n\t/* Split xarray entry. Write permission is needed */\n\tmunmap(buf, TEST_MEM_SIZE);\n\tbuf = (void *)-1;\n\tclose(fd);\n\tfd = open(filename, O_RDWR);\n\tassert(fd \u0026gt; 0);\n\tfallocate(fd, FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE | FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE,\n \t\t TEST_MEM_SIZE - pgsize, pgsize);\nout:\n\tif (buf != (void *)-1)\n\t\tmunmap(buf, TEST_MEM_SIZE);\n\tif (fd \u0026gt; 0)\n\t\tclose(fd);\r\n\r\n\treturn ret;\n}\r\n\r\n[root@dhcp-10-26-1-207 ~]# gcc /tmp/test.c -o /tmp/test\n[root@dhcp-10-26-1-207 ~]# /tmp/test\n ------------[ cut here ]------------\n WARNING: CPU: 25 PID: 7560 at lib/xarray.c:1025 xas_split_alloc+0xf8/0x128\n Modules linked in: nft_fib_inet nft_fib_ipv4 nft_fib_ipv6 nft_fib \\\n nft_reject_inet nf_reject_ipv4 nf_reject_ipv6 nft_reject nft_ct \\\n nft_chain_nat nf_nat nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4 \\\n ip_set rfkill nf_tables nfnetlink vfat fat virtio_balloon drm fuse \\\n xfs libcrc32c crct10dif_ce ghash_ce sha2_ce sha256_arm64 virtio_net \\\n sha1_ce net_failover virtio_blk virtio_console failover dimlib virtio_mmio\n CPU: 25 PID: 7560 Comm: test Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.10.0-rc7-gavin+ #9\n Hardware name: QEMU KVM Virtual Machine, BIOS edk2-20240524-1.el9 05/24/2024\n pstate: 83400005 (Nzcv daif +PAN -UAO +TCO +DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)\n pc : xas_split_alloc+0xf8/0x128\n lr : split_huge_page_to_list_to_order+0x1c4/0x780\n sp : ffff8000ac32f660\n x29: ffff8000ac32f660 x28: ffff0000e0969eb0 x27: ffff8000ac32f6c0\n x26: 0000000000000c40 x25: ffff0000e0969eb0 x24: 000000000000000d\n x23: ffff8000ac32f6c0 x22: ffffffdfc0700000 x21: 0000000000000000\n x20: 0000000000000000 x19: ffffffdfc0700000 x18: 0000000000000000\n x17: 0000000000000000 x16: ffffd5f3708ffc70 x15: 0000000000000000\n x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000\n x11: ffffffffffffffc0 x10: 0000000000000040 x9 : ffffd5f3708e692c\n x8 : 0000000000000003 x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : ffff0000e0969eb8\n x5 : ffffd5f37289e378 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000c40\n x2 : 000000000000000d x1 : 000000000000000c x0 : 0000000000000000\n Call trace:\n xas_split_alloc+0xf8/0x128\n split_huge_page_to_list_to_order+0x1c4/0x780\n truncate_inode_partial_folio+0xdc/0x160\n truncate_inode_pages_range+0x1b4/0x4a8\n truncate_pagecache_range+0x84/0xa\n---truncated---(CVE-2024-42317)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ns390/dasd: fix error checks in dasd_copy_pair_store()\r\n\r\ndasd_add_busid() can return an error via ERR_PTR() if an allocation\nfails. However, two callsites in dasd_copy_pair_store() do not check\nthe result, potentially resulting in a NULL pointer dereference. Fix\nthis by checking the result with IS_ERR() and returning the error up\nthe stack.(CVE-2024-42320)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: flow_dissector: use DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE\r\n\r\nThe following splat is easy to reproduce upstream as well as in -stable\nkernels. Florian Westphal provided the following commit:\r\n\r\n d1dab4f71d37 (\u0026quot;net: add and use __skb_get_hash_symmetric_net\u0026quot;)\r\n\r\nbut this complementary fix has been also suggested by Willem de Bruijn\nand it can be easily backported to -stable kernel which consists in\nusing DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE instead to silence the following splat\ngiven __skb_get_hash() is used by the nftables tracing infrastructure to\nto identify packets in traces.\r\n\r\n[69133.561393] ------------[ cut here ]------------\n[69133.561404] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 43576 at net/core/flow_dissector.c:1104 __skb_flow_dissect+0x134f/\n[...]\n[69133.561944] CPU: 0 PID: 43576 Comm: socat Not tainted 6.10.0-rc7+ #379\n[69133.561959] RIP: 0010:__skb_flow_dissect+0x134f/0x2ad0\n[69133.561970] Code: 83 f9 04 0f 84 b3 00 00 00 45 85 c9 0f 84 aa 00 00 00 41 83 f9 02 0f 84 81 fc ff\nff 44 0f b7 b4 24 80 00 00 00 e9 8b f9 ff ff \u0026lt;0f\u0026gt; 0b e9 20 f3 ff ff 41 f6 c6 20 0f 84 e4 ef ff ff 48 8d 7b 12 e8\n[69133.561979] RSP: 0018:ffffc90000006fc0 EFLAGS: 00010246\n[69133.561988] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffff82f33e20 RCX: ffffffff81ab7e19\n[69133.561994] RDX: dffffc0000000000 RSI: ffffc90000007388 RDI: ffff888103a1b418\n[69133.562001] RBP: ffffc90000007310 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000\n[69133.562007] R10: ffffc90000007388 R11: ffffffff810cface R12: ffff888103a1b400\n[69133.562013] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffffffff82f33e2a R15: ffffffff82f33e28\n[69133.562020] FS: 00007f40f7131740(0000) GS:ffff888390800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n[69133.562027] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n[69133.562033] CR2: 00007f40f7346ee0 CR3: 000000015d200001 CR4: 00000000001706f0\n[69133.562040] Call Trace:\n[69133.562044] \u0026lt;IRQ\u0026gt;\n[69133.562049] ? __warn+0x9f/0x1a0\n[ 1211.841384] ? __skb_flow_dissect+0x107e/0x2860\n[...]\n[ 1211.841496] ? bpf_flow_dissect+0x160/0x160\n[ 1211.841753] __skb_get_hash+0x97/0x280\n[ 1211.841765] ? __skb_get_hash_symmetric+0x230/0x230\n[ 1211.841776] ? mod_find+0xbf/0xe0\n[ 1211.841786] ? get_stack_info_noinstr+0x12/0xe0\n[ 1211.841798] ? bpf_ksym_find+0x56/0xe0\n[ 1211.841807] ? __rcu_read_unlock+0x2a/0x70\n[ 1211.841819] nft_trace_init+0x1b9/0x1c0 [nf_tables]\n[ 1211.841895] ? nft_trace_notify+0x830/0x830 [nf_tables]\n[ 1211.841964] ? get_stack_info+0x2b/0x80\n[ 1211.841975] ? nft_do_chain_arp+0x80/0x80 [nf_tables]\n[ 1211.842044] nft_do_chain+0x79c/0x850 [nf_tables](CVE-2024-42321)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: missing check virtio\r\n\r\nTwo missing check in virtio_net_hdr_to_skb() allowed syzbot\nto crash kernels again\r\n\r\n1. After the skb_segment function the buffer may become non-linear\n(nr_frags != 0), but since the SKBTX_SHARED_FRAG flag is not set anywhere\nthe __skb_linearize function will not be executed, then the buffer will\nremain non-linear. Then the condition (offset \u0026gt;= skb_headlen(skb))\nbecomes true, which causes WARN_ON_ONCE in skb_checksum_help.\r\n\r\n2. The struct sk_buff and struct virtio_net_hdr members must be\nmathematically related.\n(gso_size) must be greater than (needed) otherwise WARN_ON_ONCE.\n(remainder) must be greater than (needed) otherwise WARN_ON_ONCE.\n(remainder) may be 0 if division is without remainder.\r\n\r\noffset+2 (4191) \u0026gt; skb_headlen() (1116)\nWARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5084 at net/core/dev.c:3303 skb_checksum_help+0x5e2/0x740 net/core/dev.c:3303\nModules linked in:\nCPU: 1 PID: 5084 Comm: syz-executor336 Not tainted 6.7.0-rc3-syzkaller-00014-gdf60cee26a2e #0\nHardware name: Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 11/10/2023\nRIP: 0010:skb_checksum_help+0x5e2/0x740 net/core/dev.c:3303\nCode: 89 e8 83 e0 07 83 c0 03 38 d0 7c 08 84 d2 0f 85 52 01 00 00 44 89 e2 2b 53 74 4c 89 ee 48 c7 c7 40 57 e9 8b e8 af 8f dd f8 90 \u0026lt;0f\u0026gt; 0b 90 90 e9 87 fe ff ff e8 40 0f 6e f9 e9 4b fa ff ff 48 89 ef\nRSP: 0018:ffffc90003a9f338 EFLAGS: 00010286\nRAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff888025125780 RCX: ffffffff814db209\nRDX: ffff888015393b80 RSI: ffffffff814db216 RDI: 0000000000000001\nRBP: ffff8880251257f4 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000\nR10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 000000000000045c\nR13: 000000000000105f R14: ffff8880251257f0 R15: 000000000000105d\nFS: 0000555555c24380(0000) GS:ffff8880b9900000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: 000000002000f000 CR3: 0000000023151000 CR4: 00000000003506f0\nDR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\nDR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n ip_do_fragment+0xa1b/0x18b0 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:777\n ip_fragment.constprop.0+0x161/0x230 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:584\n ip_finish_output_gso net/ipv4/ip_output.c:286 [inline]\n __ip_finish_output net/ipv4/ip_output.c:308 [inline]\n __ip_finish_output+0x49c/0x650 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:295\n ip_finish_output+0x31/0x310 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:323\n NF_HOOK_COND include/linux/netfilter.h:303 [inline]\n ip_output+0x13b/0x2a0 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:433\n dst_output include/net/dst.h:451 [inline]\n ip_local_out+0xaf/0x1a0 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:129\n iptunnel_xmit+0x5b4/0x9b0 net/ipv4/ip_tunnel_core.c:82\n ipip6_tunnel_xmit net/ipv6/sit.c:1034 [inline]\n sit_tunnel_xmit+0xed2/0x28f0 net/ipv6/sit.c:1076\n __netdev_start_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:4940 [inline]\n netdev_start_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:4954 [inline]\n xmit_one net/core/dev.c:3545 [inline]\n dev_hard_start_xmit+0x13d/0x6d0 net/core/dev.c:3561\n __dev_queue_xmit+0x7c1/0x3d60 net/core/dev.c:4346\n dev_queue_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:3134 [inline]\n packet_xmit+0x257/0x380 net/packet/af_packet.c:276\n packet_snd net/packet/af_packet.c:3087 [inline]\n packet_sendmsg+0x24ca/0x5240 net/packet/af_packet.c:3119\n sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]\n __sock_sendmsg+0xd5/0x180 net/socket.c:745\n __sys_sendto+0x255/0x340 net/socket.c:2190\n __do_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2202 [inline]\n __se_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2198 [inline]\n __x64_sys_sendto+0xe0/0x1b0 net/socket.c:2198\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0x40/0x110 arch/x86/entry/common.c:82\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b\r\n\r\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Syzkaller(CVE-2024-43817)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nASoC: amd: Adjust error handling in case of absent codec device\r\n\r\nacpi_get_first_physical_node() can return NULL in several cases (no such\ndevice, ACPI table error, reference count drop to 0, etc).\nExisting check just emit error message, but doesn\u0026apos;t perform return.\nThen this NULL pointer is passed to devm_acpi_dev_add_driver_gpios()\nwhere it is dereferenced.\r\n\r\nAdjust this error handling by adding error code return.\r\n\r\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2024-43818)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nscsi: lpfc: Fix a possible null pointer dereference\r\n\r\nIn function lpfc_xcvr_data_show, the memory allocation with kmalloc might\nfail, thereby making rdp_context a null pointer. In the following context\nand functions that use this pointer, there are dereferencing operations,\nleading to null pointer dereference.\r\n\r\nTo fix this issue, a null pointer check should be added. If it is null,\nuse scnprintf to notify the user and return len.(CVE-2024-43821)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\niio: Fix the sorting functionality in iio_gts_build_avail_time_table\r\n\r\nThe sorting in iio_gts_build_avail_time_table is not working as intended.\nIt could result in an out-of-bounds access when the time is zero.\r\n\r\nHere are more details:\r\n\r\n1. When the gts-\u0026gt;itime_table[i].time_us is zero, e.g., the time\nsequence is `3, 0, 1`, the inner for-loop will not terminate and do\nout-of-bound writes. This is because once `times[j] \u0026gt; new`, the value\n`new` will be added in the current position and the `times[j]` will be\nmoved to `j+1` position, which makes the if-condition always hold.\nMeanwhile, idx will be added one, making the loop keep running without\ntermination and out-of-bound write.\n2. If none of the gts-\u0026gt;itime_table[i].time_us is zero, the elements\nwill just be copied without being sorted as described in the comment\n\u0026quot;Sort times from all tables to one and remove duplicates\u0026quot;.\r\n\r\nFor more details, please refer to\nhttps://lore.kernel.org/all/6dd0d822-046c-4dd2-9532-79d7ab96ec05@gmail.com.(CVE-2024-43825)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnfs: pass explicit offset/count to trace events\r\n\r\nnfs_folio_length is unsafe to use without having the folio locked and a\ncheck for a NULL -\u0026gt;f_mapping that protects against truncations and can\nlead to kernel crashes. E.g. when running xfstests generic/065 with\nall nfs trace points enabled.\r\n\r\nFollow the model of the XFS trace points and pass in an expl\u0456cit offset\nand length. This has the additional benefit that these values can\nbe more accurate as some of the users touch partial folio ranges.(CVE-2024-43826)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/qxl: Add check for drm_cvt_mode\r\n\r\nAdd check for the return value of drm_cvt_mode() and return the error if\nit fails in order to avoid NULL pointer dereference.(CVE-2024-43829)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ns390/uv: Don\u0026apos;t call folio_wait_writeback() without a folio reference\r\n\r\nfolio_wait_writeback() requires that no spinlocks are held and that\na folio reference is held, as documented. After we dropped the PTL, the\nfolio could get freed concurrently. So grab a temporary reference.(CVE-2024-43832)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmedia: v4l: async: Fix NULL pointer dereference in adding ancillary links\r\n\r\nIn v4l2_async_create_ancillary_links(), ancillary links are created for\nlens and flash sub-devices. These are sub-device to sub-device links and\nif the async notifier is related to a V4L2 device, the source sub-device\nof the ancillary link is NULL, leading to a NULL pointer dereference.\nCheck the notifier\u0026apos;s sd field is non-NULL in\nv4l2_async_create_ancillary_links().\r\n\r\n[Sakari Ailus: Reword the subject and commit messages slightly.](CVE-2024-43833)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbpf: Fix null pointer dereference in resolve_prog_type() for BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT\r\n\r\nWhen loading a EXT program without specifying `attr-\u0026gt;attach_prog_fd`,\nthe `prog-\u0026gt;aux-\u0026gt;dst_prog` will be null. At this time, calling\nresolve_prog_type() anywhere will result in a null pointer dereference.\r\n\r\nExample stack trace:\r\n\r\n[ 8.107863] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000004\n[ 8.108262] Mem abort info:\n[ 8.108384] ESR = 0x0000000096000004\n[ 8.108547] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits\n[ 8.108722] SET = 0, FnV = 0\n[ 8.108827] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0\n[ 8.108939] FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault\n[ 8.109102] Data abort info:\n[ 8.109203] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004, ISS2 = 0x00000000\n[ 8.109399] CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0\n[ 8.109614] GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0\n[ 8.109836] user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000101354000\n[ 8.110011] [0000000000000004] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=0000000000000000\n[ 8.112624] Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP\n[ 8.112783] Modules linked in:\n[ 8.113120] CPU: 0 PID: 99 Comm: may_access_dire Not tainted 6.10.0-rc3-next-20240613-dirty #1\n[ 8.113230] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)\n[ 8.113390] pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)\n[ 8.113429] pc : may_access_direct_pkt_data+0x24/0xa0\n[ 8.113746] lr : add_subprog_and_kfunc+0x634/0x8e8\n[ 8.113798] sp : ffff80008283b9f0\n[ 8.113813] x29: ffff80008283b9f0 x28: ffff800082795048 x27: 0000000000000001\n[ 8.113881] x26: ffff0000c0bb2600 x25: 0000000000000000 x24: 0000000000000000\n[ 8.113897] x23: ffff0000c1134000 x22: 000000000001864f x21: ffff0000c1138000\n[ 8.113912] x20: 0000000000000001 x19: ffff0000c12b8000 x18: ffffffffffffffff\n[ 8.113929] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 0720072007200720\n[ 8.113944] x14: 0720072007200720 x13: 0720072007200720 x12: 0720072007200720\n[ 8.113958] x11: 0720072007200720 x10: 0000000000f9fca4 x9 : ffff80008021f4e4\n[ 8.113991] x8 : 0101010101010101 x7 : 746f72705f6d656d x6 : 000000001e0e0f5f\n[ 8.114006] x5 : 000000000001864f x4 : ffff0000c12b8000 x3 : 000000000000001c\n[ 8.114020] x2 : 0000000000000002 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : 0000000000000000\n[ 8.114126] Call trace:\n[ 8.114159] may_access_direct_pkt_data+0x24/0xa0\n[ 8.114202] bpf_check+0x3bc/0x28c0\n[ 8.114214] bpf_prog_load+0x658/0xa58\n[ 8.114227] __sys_bpf+0xc50/0x2250\n[ 8.114240] __arm64_sys_bpf+0x28/0x40\n[ 8.114254] invoke_syscall.constprop.0+0x54/0xf0\n[ 8.114273] do_el0_svc+0x4c/0xd8\n[ 8.114289] el0_svc+0x3c/0x140\n[ 8.114305] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x134/0x150\n[ 8.114331] el0t_64_sync+0x168/0x170\n[ 8.114477] Code: 7100707f 54000081 f9401c00 f9403800 (b9400403)\n[ 8.118672] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---\r\n\r\nOne way to fix it is by forcing `attach_prog_fd` non-empty when\nbpf_prog_load(). But this will lead to `libbpf_probe_bpf_prog_type`\nAPI broken which use verifier log to probe prog type and will log\nnothing if we reject invalid EXT prog before bpf_check().\r\n\r\nAnother way is by adding null check in resolve_prog_type().\r\n\r\nThe issue was introduced by commit 4a9c7bbe2ed4 (\u0026quot;bpf: Resolve to\nprog-\u0026gt;aux-\u0026gt;dst_prog-\u0026gt;type only for BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT\u0026quot;) which wanted\nto correct type resolution for BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING programs. Before\nthat, the type resolution of BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT prog actually follows\nthe logic below:\r\n\r\n prog-\u0026gt;aux-\u0026gt;dst_prog ? prog-\u0026gt;aux-\u0026gt;dst_prog-\u0026gt;type : prog-\u0026gt;type;\r\n\r\nIt implies that when EXT program is not yet attached to `dst_prog`,\nthe prog type should be EXT itself. This code worked fine in the past.\nSo just keep using it.\r\n\r\nFix this by returning `prog-\u0026gt;type` for BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT if `dst_prog`\nis not present in resolve_prog_type().(CVE-2024-43837)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nwifi: virt_wifi: avoid reporting connection success with wrong SSID\r\n\r\nWhen user issues a connection with a different SSID than the one\nvirt_wifi has advertised, the __cfg80211_connect_result() will\ntrigger the warning: WARN_ON(bss_not_found).\r\n\r\nThe issue is because the connection code in virt_wifi does not\ncheck the SSID from user space (it only checks the BSSID), and\nvirt_wifi will call cfg80211_connect_result() with WLAN_STATUS_SUCCESS\neven if the SSID is different from the one virt_wifi has advertised.\nEventually cfg80211 won\u0026apos;t be able to find the cfg80211_bss and generate\nthe warning.\r\n\r\nFixed it by checking the SSID (from user space) in the connection code.(CVE-2024-43841)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nwifi: rtw89: Fix array index mistake in rtw89_sta_info_get_iter()\r\n\r\nIn rtw89_sta_info_get_iter() \u0026apos;status-\u0026gt;he_gi\u0026apos; is compared to array size.\nBut then \u0026apos;rate-\u0026gt;he_gi\u0026apos; is used as array index instead of \u0026apos;status-\u0026gt;he_gi\u0026apos;.\nThis can lead to go beyond array boundaries in case of \u0026apos;rate-\u0026gt;he_gi\u0026apos; is\nnot equal to \u0026apos;status-\u0026gt;he_gi\u0026apos; and is bigger than array size. Looks like\n\u0026quot;copy-paste\u0026quot; mistake.\r\n\r\nFix this mistake by replacing \u0026apos;rate-\u0026gt;he_gi\u0026apos; with \u0026apos;status-\u0026gt;he_gi\u0026apos;.\r\n\r\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2024-43842)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nudf: Fix bogus checksum computation in udf_rename()\r\n\r\nSyzbot reports uninitialized memory access in udf_rename() when updating\nchecksum of \u0026apos;..\u0026apos; directory entry of a moved directory. This is indeed\ntrue as we pass on-stack diriter.fi to the udf_update_tag() and because\nthat has only struct fileIdentDesc included in it and not the impUse or\nname fields, the checksumming function is going to checksum random stack\ncontents beyond the end of the structure. This is actually harmless\nbecause the following udf_fiiter_write_fi() will recompute the checksum\nfrom on-disk buffers where everything is properly included. So all that\nis needed is just removing the bogus calculation.(CVE-2024-43845)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nlib: objagg: Fix general protection fault\r\n\r\nThe library supports aggregation of objects into other objects only if\nthe parent object does not have a parent itself. That is, nesting is not\nsupported.\r\n\r\nAggregation happens in two cases: Without and with hints, where hints\nare a pre-computed recommendation on how to aggregate the provided\nobjects.\r\n\r\nNesting is not possible in the first case due to a check that prevents\nit, but in the second case there is no check because the assumption is\nthat nesting cannot happen when creating objects based on hints. The\nviolation of this assumption leads to various warnings and eventually to\na general protection fault [1].\r\n\r\nBefore fixing the root cause, error out when nesting happens and warn.\r\n\r\n[1]\ngeneral protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdead000000000d90: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI\nCPU: 1 PID: 1083 Comm: kworker/1:9 Tainted: G W 6.9.0-rc6-custom-gd9b4f1cca7fb #7\nHardware name: Mellanox Technologies Ltd. MSN3700/VMOD0005, BIOS 5.11 01/06/2019\nWorkqueue: mlxsw_core mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work\nRIP: 0010:mlxsw_sp_acl_erp_bf_insert+0x25/0x80\n[...]\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n mlxsw_sp_acl_atcam_entry_add+0x256/0x3c0\n mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_entry_create+0x5e/0xa0\n mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vchunk_migrate_one+0x16b/0x270\n mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work+0xbe/0x510\n process_one_work+0x151/0x370\n worker_thread+0x2cb/0x3e0\n kthread+0xd0/0x100\n ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;(CVE-2024-43846)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nwifi: ath12k: fix invalid memory access while processing fragmented packets\r\n\r\nThe monitor ring and the reo reinject ring share the same ring mask index.\nWhen the driver receives an interrupt for the reo reinject ring, the\nmonitor ring is also processed, leading to invalid memory access. Since\nmonitor support is not yet enabled in ath12k, the ring mask for the monitor\nring should be removed.\r\n\r\nTested-on: QCN9274 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.WBE.1.1.1-00209-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1(CVE-2024-43847)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nsoc: qcom: pdr: protect locator_addr with the main mutex\r\n\r\nIf the service locator server is restarted fast enough, the PDR can\nrewrite locator_addr fields concurrently. Protect them by placing\nmodification of those fields under the main pdr-\u0026gt;lock.(CVE-2024-43849)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nsoc: qcom: icc-bwmon: Fix refcount imbalance seen during bwmon_remove\r\n\r\nThe following warning is seen during bwmon_remove due to refcount\nimbalance, fix this by releasing the OPPs after use.\r\n\r\nLogs:\nWARNING: at drivers/opp/core.c:1640 _opp_table_kref_release+0x150/0x158\nHardware name: Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. X1E80100 CRD (DT)\n...\nCall trace:\n_opp_table_kref_release+0x150/0x158\ndev_pm_opp_remove_table+0x100/0x1b4\ndevm_pm_opp_of_table_release+0x10/0x1c\ndevm_action_release+0x14/0x20\ndevres_release_all+0xa4/0x104\ndevice_unbind_cleanup+0x18/0x60\ndevice_release_driver_internal+0x1ec/0x228\ndriver_detach+0x50/0x98\nbus_remove_driver+0x6c/0xbc\ndriver_unregister+0x30/0x60\nplatform_driver_unregister+0x14/0x20\nbwmon_driver_exit+0x18/0x524 [icc_bwmon]\n__arm64_sys_delete_module+0x184/0x264\ninvoke_syscall+0x48/0x118\nel0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xc8/0xe8\ndo_el0_svc+0x20/0x2c\nel0_svc+0x34/0xdc\nel0t_64_sync_handler+0x13c/0x158\nel0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194\n--[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---(CVE-2024-43850)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nsoc: xilinx: rename cpu_number1 to dummy_cpu_number\r\n\r\nThe per cpu variable cpu_number1 is passed to xlnx_event_handler as\nargument \u0026quot;dev_id\u0026quot;, but it is not used in this function. So drop the\ninitialization of this variable and rename it to dummy_cpu_number.\nThis patch is to fix the following call trace when the kernel option\nCONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP is enabled:\r\n\r\nBUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at include/linux/sched/mm.h:274\n in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 1, name: swapper/0\n preempt_count: 1, expected: 0\n CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.1.0 #53\n Hardware name: Xilinx Versal vmk180 Eval board rev1.1 (QSPI) (DT)\n Call trace:\n dump_backtrace+0xd0/0xe0\n show_stack+0x18/0x40\n dump_stack_lvl+0x7c/0xa0\n dump_stack+0x18/0x34\n __might_resched+0x10c/0x140\n __might_sleep+0x4c/0xa0\n __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0xf4/0x168\n kmalloc_trace+0x28/0x38\n __request_percpu_irq+0x74/0x138\n xlnx_event_manager_probe+0xf8/0x298\n platform_probe+0x68/0xd8(CVE-2024-43851)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmd: fix deadlock between mddev_suspend and flush bio\r\n\r\nDeadlock occurs when mddev is being suspended while some flush bio is in\nprogress. It is a complex issue.\r\n\r\nT1. the first flush is at the ending stage, it clears \u0026apos;mddev-\u0026gt;flush_bio\u0026apos;\n and tries to submit data, but is blocked because mddev is suspended\n by T4.\nT2. the second flush sets \u0026apos;mddev-\u0026gt;flush_bio\u0026apos;, and attempts to queue\n md_submit_flush_data(), which is already running (T1) and won\u0026apos;t\n execute again if on the same CPU as T1.\nT3. the third flush inc active_io and tries to flush, but is blocked because\n \u0026apos;mddev-\u0026gt;flush_bio\u0026apos; is not NULL (set by T2).\nT4. mddev_suspend() is called and waits for active_io dec to 0 which is inc\n by T3.\r\n\r\n T1\t\tT2\t\tT3\t\tT4\n (flush 1)\t(flush 2)\t(third 3)\t(suspend)\n md_submit_flush_data\n mddev-\u0026gt;flush_bio = NULL;\n .\n .\t \tmd_flush_request\n .\t \t mddev-\u0026gt;flush_bio = bio\n .\t \t queue submit_flushes\n .\t\t .\n .\t\t .\t\tmd_handle_request\n .\t\t .\t\t active_io + 1\n .\t\t .\t\t md_flush_request\n .\t\t .\t\t wait !mddev-\u0026gt;flush_bio\n .\t\t .\n .\t\t .\t\t\t\tmddev_suspend\n .\t\t .\t\t\t\t wait !active_io\n .\t\t .\n .\t\t submit_flushes\n .\t\t queue_work md_submit_flush_data\n .\t\t //md_submit_flush_data is already running (T1)\n .\n md_handle_request\n wait resume\r\n\r\nThe root issue is non-atomic inc/dec of active_io during flush process.\nactive_io is dec before md_submit_flush_data is queued, and inc soon\nafter md_submit_flush_data() run.\n md_flush_request\n active_io + 1\n submit_flushes\n active_io - 1\n md_submit_flush_data\n md_handle_request\n active_io + 1\n make_request\n active_io - 1\r\n\r\nIf active_io is dec after md_handle_request() instead of within\nsubmit_flushes(), make_request() can be called directly intead of\nmd_handle_request() in md_submit_flush_data(), and active_io will\nonly inc and dec once in the whole flush process. Deadlock will be\nfixed.\r\n\r\nAdditionally, the only difference between fixing the issue and before is\nthat there is no return error handling of make_request(). But after\nprevious patch cleaned md_write_start(), make_requst() only return error\nin raid5_make_request() by dm-raid, see commit 41425f96d7aa (\u0026quot;dm-raid456,\nmd/raid456: fix a deadlock for dm-raid456 while io concurrent with\nreshape)\u0026quot;. Since dm always splits data and flush operation into two\nseparate io, io size of flush submitted by dm always is 0, make_request()\nwill not be called in md_submit_flush_data(). To prevent future\nmodifications from introducing issues, add WARN_ON to ensure\nmake_request() no error is returned in this context.(CVE-2024-43855)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndma: fix call order in dmam_free_coherent\r\n\r\ndmam_free_coherent() frees a DMA allocation, which makes the\nfreed vaddr available for reuse, then calls devres_destroy()\nto remove and free the data structure used to track the DMA\nallocation. Between the two calls, it is possible for a\nconcurrent task to make an allocation with the same vaddr\nand add it to the devres list.\r\n\r\nIf this happens, there will be two entries in the devres list\nwith the same vaddr and devres_destroy() can free the wrong\nentry, triggering the WARN_ON() in dmam_match.\r\n\r\nFix by destroying the devres entry before freeing the DMA\nallocation.\r\n\r\n kokonut //net/encryption\n http://sponge2/b9145fe6-0f72-4325-ac2f-a84d81075b03(CVE-2024-43856)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nf2fs: fix to truncate preallocated blocks in f2fs_file_open()\r\n\r\nchenyuwen reports a f2fs bug as below:\r\n\r\nUnable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000011\n fscrypt_set_bio_crypt_ctx+0x78/0x1e8\n f2fs_grab_read_bio+0x78/0x208\n f2fs_submit_page_read+0x44/0x154\n f2fs_get_read_data_page+0x288/0x5f4\n f2fs_get_lock_data_page+0x60/0x190\n truncate_partial_data_page+0x108/0x4fc\n f2fs_do_truncate_blocks+0x344/0x5f0\n f2fs_truncate_blocks+0x6c/0x134\n f2fs_truncate+0xd8/0x200\n f2fs_iget+0x20c/0x5ac\n do_garbage_collect+0x5d0/0xf6c\n f2fs_gc+0x22c/0x6a4\n f2fs_disable_checkpoint+0xc8/0x310\n f2fs_fill_super+0x14bc/0x1764\n mount_bdev+0x1b4/0x21c\n f2fs_mount+0x20/0x30\n legacy_get_tree+0x50/0xbc\n vfs_get_tree+0x5c/0x1b0\n do_new_mount+0x298/0x4cc\n path_mount+0x33c/0x5fc\n __arm64_sys_mount+0xcc/0x15c\n invoke_syscall+0x60/0x150\n el0_svc_common+0xb8/0xf8\n do_el0_svc+0x28/0xa0\n el0_svc+0x24/0x84\n el0t_64_sync_handler+0x88/0xec\r\n\r\nIt is because inode.i_crypt_info is not initialized during below path:\n- mount\n - f2fs_fill_super\n - f2fs_disable_checkpoint\n - f2fs_gc\n - f2fs_iget\n - f2fs_truncate\r\n\r\nSo, let\u0026apos;s relocate truncation of preallocated blocks to f2fs_file_open(),\nafter fscrypt_file_open().(CVE-2024-43859)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nusb: vhci-hcd: Do not drop references before new references are gained\r\n\r\nAt a few places the driver carries stale pointers\nto references that can still be used. Make sure that does not happen.\nThis strictly speaking closes ZDI-CAN-22273, though there may be\nsimilar races in the driver.(CVE-2024-43883)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nBluetooth: MGMT: Add error handling to pair_device()\r\n\r\nhci_conn_params_add() never checks for a NULL value and could lead to a NULL\npointer dereference causing a crash.\r\n\r\nFixed by adding error handling in the function.(CVE-2024-43884)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\npadata: Fix possible divide-by-0 panic in padata_mt_helper()\r\n\r\nWe are hit with a not easily reproducible divide-by-0 panic in padata.c at\nbootup time.\r\n\r\n [ 10.017908] Oops: divide error: 0000 1 PREEMPT SMP NOPTI\n [ 10.017908] CPU: 26 PID: 2627 Comm: kworker/u1666:1 Not tainted 6.10.0-15.el10.x86_64 #1\n [ 10.017908] Hardware name: Lenovo ThinkSystem SR950 [7X12CTO1WW]/[7X12CTO1WW], BIOS [PSE140J-2.30] 07/20/2021\n [ 10.017908] Workqueue: events_unbound padata_mt_helper\n [ 10.017908] RIP: 0010:padata_mt_helper+0x39/0xb0\n :\n [ 10.017963] Call Trace:\n [ 10.017968] \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n [ 10.018004] ? padata_mt_helper+0x39/0xb0\n [ 10.018084] process_one_work+0x174/0x330\n [ 10.018093] worker_thread+0x266/0x3a0\n [ 10.018111] kthread+0xcf/0x100\n [ 10.018124] ret_from_fork+0x31/0x50\n [ 10.018138] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30\n [ 10.018147] \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\r\n\r\nLooking at the padata_mt_helper() function, the only way a divide-by-0\npanic can happen is when ps-\u0026gt;chunk_size is 0. The way that chunk_size is\ninitialized in padata_do_multithreaded(), chunk_size can be 0 when the\nmin_chunk in the passed-in padata_mt_job structure is 0.\r\n\r\nFix this divide-by-0 panic by making sure that chunk_size will be at least\n1 no matter what the input parameters are.(CVE-2024-43889)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ntracing: Fix overflow in get_free_elt()\r\n\r\n\u0026quot;tracing_map-\u0026gt;next_elt\u0026quot; in get_free_elt() is at risk of overflowing.\r\n\r\nOnce it overflows, new elements can still be inserted into the tracing_map\neven though the maximum number of elements (`max_elts`) has been reached.\nContinuing to insert elements after the overflow could result in the\ntracing_map containing \u0026quot;tracing_map-\u0026gt;max_size\u0026quot; elements, leaving no empty\nentries.\nIf any attempt is made to insert an element into a full tracing_map using\n`__tracing_map_insert()`, it will cause an infinite loop with preemption\ndisabled, leading to a CPU hang problem.\r\n\r\nFix this by preventing any further increments to \u0026quot;tracing_map-\u0026gt;next_elt\u0026quot;\nonce it reaches \u0026quot;tracing_map-\u0026gt;max_elt\u0026quot;.(CVE-2024-43890)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ntracing: Have format file honor EVENT_FILE_FL_FREED\r\n\r\nWhen eventfs was introduced, special care had to be done to coordinate the\nfreeing of the file meta data with the files that are exposed to user\nspace. The file meta data would have a ref count that is set when the file\nis created and would be decremented and freed after the last user that\nopened the file closed it. When the file meta data was to be freed, it\nwould set a flag (EVENT_FILE_FL_FREED) to denote that the file is freed,\nand any new references made (like new opens or reads) would fail as it is\nmarked freed. This allowed other meta data to be freed after this flag was\nset (under the event_mutex).\r\n\r\nAll the files that were dynamically created in the events directory had a\npointer to the file meta data and would call event_release() when the last\nreference to the user space file was closed. This would be the time that it\nis safe to free the file meta data.\r\n\r\nA shortcut was made for the \u0026quot;format\u0026quot; file. It\u0026apos;s i_private would point to\nthe \u0026quot;call\u0026quot; entry directly and not point to the file\u0026apos;s meta data. This is\nbecause all format files are the same for the same \u0026quot;call\u0026quot;, so it was\nthought there was no reason to differentiate them. The other files\nmaintain state (like the \u0026quot;enable\u0026quot;, \u0026quot;trigger\u0026quot;, etc). But this meant if the\nfile were to disappear, the \u0026quot;format\u0026quot; file would be unaware of it.\r\n\r\nThis caused a race that could be trigger via the user_events test (that\nwould create dynamic events and free them), and running a loop that would\nread the user_events format files:\r\n\r\nIn one console run:\r\n\r\n # cd tools/testing/selftests/user_events\n # while true; do ./ftrace_test; done\r\n\r\nAnd in another console run:\r\n\r\n # cd /sys/kernel/tracing/\n # while true; do cat events/user_events/__test_event/format; done 2\u0026gt;/dev/null\r\n\r\nWith KASAN memory checking, it would trigger a use-after-free bug report\n(which was a real bug). This was because the format file was not checking\nthe file\u0026apos;s meta data flag \u0026quot;EVENT_FILE_FL_FREED\u0026quot;, so it would access the\nevent that the file meta data pointed to after the event was freed.\r\n\r\nAfter inspection, there are other locations that were found to not check\nthe EVENT_FILE_FL_FREED flag when accessing the trace_event_file. Add a\nnew helper function: event_file_file() that will make sure that the\nevent_mutex is held, and will return NULL if the trace_event_file has the\nEVENT_FILE_FL_FREED flag set. Have the first reference of the struct file\npointer use event_file_file() and check for NULL. Later uses can still use\nthe event_file_data() helper function if the event_mutex is still held and\nwas not released since the event_file_file() call.(CVE-2024-43891)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amd/display: Skip Recompute DSC Params if no Stream on Link\r\n\r\n[why]\nEncounter NULL pointer dereference uner mst + dsc setup.\r\n\r\nBUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000008\n PGD 0 P4D 0\n Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI\n CPU: 4 PID: 917 Comm: sway Not tainted 6.3.9-arch1-1 #1 124dc55df4f5272ccb409f39ef4872fc2b3376a2\n Hardware name: LENOVO 20NKS01Y00/20NKS01Y00, BIOS R12ET61W(1.31 ) 07/28/2022\n RIP: 0010:drm_dp_atomic_find_time_slots+0x5e/0x260 [drm_display_helper]\n Code: 01 00 00 48 8b 85 60 05 00 00 48 63 80 88 00 00 00 3b 43 28 0f 8d 2e 01 00 00 48 8b 53 30 48 8d 04 80 48 8d 04 c2 48 8b 40 18 \u0026lt;48\u0026gt; 8\u0026gt;\n RSP: 0018:ffff960cc2df77d8 EFLAGS: 00010293\n RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8afb87e81280 RCX: 0000000000000224\n RDX: ffff8afb9ee37c00 RSI: ffff8afb8da1a578 RDI: ffff8afb87e81280\n RBP: ffff8afb83d67000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffff8afb9652f850\n R10: ffff960cc2df7908 R11: 0000000000000002 R12: 0000000000000000\n R13: ffff8afb8d7688a0 R14: ffff8afb8da1a578 R15: 0000000000000224\n FS: 00007f4dac35ce00(0000) GS:ffff8afe30b00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n CR2: 0000000000000008 CR3: 000000010ddc6000 CR4: 00000000003506e0\n Call Trace:\n\u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n ? __die+0x23/0x70\n ? page_fault_oops+0x171/0x4e0\n ? plist_add+0xbe/0x100\n ? exc_page_fault+0x7c/0x180\n ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30\n ? drm_dp_atomic_find_time_slots+0x5e/0x260 [drm_display_helper 0e67723696438d8e02b741593dd50d80b44c2026]\n ? drm_dp_atomic_find_time_slots+0x28/0x260 [drm_display_helper 0e67723696438d8e02b741593dd50d80b44c2026]\n compute_mst_dsc_configs_for_link+0x2ff/0xa40 [amdgpu 62e600d2a75e9158e1cd0a243bdc8e6da040c054]\n ? fill_plane_buffer_attributes+0x419/0x510 [amdgpu 62e600d2a75e9158e1cd0a243bdc8e6da040c054]\n compute_mst_dsc_configs_for_state+0x1e1/0x250 [amdgpu 62e600d2a75e9158e1cd0a243bdc8e6da040c054]\n amdgpu_dm_atomic_check+0xecd/0x1190 [amdgpu 62e600d2a75e9158e1cd0a243bdc8e6da040c054]\n drm_atomic_check_only+0x5c5/0xa40\n drm_mode_atomic_ioctl+0x76e/0xbc0\r\n\r\n[how]\ndsc recompute should be skipped if no mode change detected on the new\nrequest. If detected, keep checking whether the stream is already on\ncurrent state or not.\r\n\r\n(cherry picked from commit 8151a6c13111b465dbabe07c19f572f7cbd16fef)(CVE-2024-43895)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: drop bad gso csum_start and offset in virtio_net_hdr\r\n\r\nTighten csum_start and csum_offset checks in virtio_net_hdr_to_skb\nfor GSO packets.\r\n\r\nThe function already checks that a checksum requested with\nVIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_NEEDS_CSUM is in skb linear. But for GSO packets\nthis might not hold for segs after segmentation.\r\n\r\nSyzkaller demonstrated to reach this warning in skb_checksum_help\r\n\r\n\toffset = skb_checksum_start_offset(skb);\n\tret = -EINVAL;\n\tif (WARN_ON_ONCE(offset \u0026gt;= skb_headlen(skb)))\r\n\r\nBy injecting a TSO packet:\r\n\r\nWARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 3539 at net/core/dev.c:3284 skb_checksum_help+0x3d0/0x5b0\n ip_do_fragment+0x209/0x1b20 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:774\n ip_finish_output_gso net/ipv4/ip_output.c:279 [inline]\n __ip_finish_output+0x2bd/0x4b0 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:301\n iptunnel_xmit+0x50c/0x930 net/ipv4/ip_tunnel_core.c:82\n ip_tunnel_xmit+0x2296/0x2c70 net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c:813\n __gre_xmit net/ipv4/ip_gre.c:469 [inline]\n ipgre_xmit+0x759/0xa60 net/ipv4/ip_gre.c:661\n __netdev_start_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:4850 [inline]\n netdev_start_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:4864 [inline]\n xmit_one net/core/dev.c:3595 [inline]\n dev_hard_start_xmit+0x261/0x8c0 net/core/dev.c:3611\n __dev_queue_xmit+0x1b97/0x3c90 net/core/dev.c:4261\n packet_snd net/packet/af_packet.c:3073 [inline]\r\n\r\nThe geometry of the bad input packet at tcp_gso_segment:\r\n\r\n[ 52.003050][ T8403] skb len=12202 headroom=244 headlen=12093 tailroom=0\n[ 52.003050][ T8403] mac=(168,24) mac_len=24 net=(192,52) trans=244\n[ 52.003050][ T8403] shinfo(txflags=0 nr_frags=1 gso(size=1552 type=3 segs=0))\n[ 52.003050][ T8403] csum(0x60000c7 start=199 offset=1536\nip_summed=3 complete_sw=0 valid=0 level=0)\r\n\r\nMitigate with stricter input validation.\r\n\r\ncsum_offset: for GSO packets, deduce the correct value from gso_type.\nThis is already done for USO. Extend it to TSO. Let UFO be:\nudp[46]_ufo_fragment ignores these fields and always computes the\nchecksum in software.\r\n\r\ncsum_start: finding the real offset requires parsing to the transport\nheader. Do not add a parser, use existing segmentation parsing. Thanks\nto SKB_GSO_DODGY, that also catches bad packets that are hw offloaded.\nAgain test both TSO and USO. Do not test UFO for the above reason, and\ndo not test UDP tunnel offload.\r\n\r\nGSO packet are almost always CHECKSUM_PARTIAL. USO packets may be\nCHECKSUM_NONE since commit 10154dbded6d6 (\u0026quot;udp: Allow GSO transmit\nfrom devices with no checksum offload\u0026quot;), but then still these fields\nare initialized correctly in udp4_hwcsum/udp6_hwcsum_outgoing. So no\nneed to test for ip_summed == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL first.\r\n\r\nThis revises an existing fix mentioned in the Fixes tag, which broke\nsmall packets with GSO offload, as detected by kselftests.(CVE-2024-43897)\r\n\r\nRejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.(CVE-2024-43898)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amd/display: Fix null pointer deref in dcn20_resource.c\r\n\r\nFixes a hang thats triggered when MPV is run on a DCN401 dGPU:\r\n\r\nmpv --hwdec=vaapi --vo=gpu --hwdec-codecs=all\r\n\r\nand then enabling fullscreen playback (double click on the video)\r\n\r\nThe following calltrace will be seen:\r\n\r\n[ 181.843989] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000\n[ 181.843997] #PF: supervisor instruction fetch in kernel mode\n[ 181.844003] #PF: error_code(0x0010) - not-present page\n[ 181.844009] PGD 0 P4D 0\n[ 181.844020] Oops: 0010 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI\n[ 181.844028] CPU: 6 PID: 1892 Comm: gnome-shell Tainted: G W OE 6.5.0-41-generic #41~22.04.2-Ubuntu\n[ 181.844038] Hardware name: System manufacturer System Product Name/CROSSHAIR VI HERO, BIOS 6302 10/23/2018\n[ 181.844044] RIP: 0010:0x0\n[ 181.844079] Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at 0xffffffffffffffd6.\n[ 181.844084] RSP: 0018:ffffb593c2b8f7b0 EFLAGS: 00010246\n[ 181.844093] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000004\n[ 181.844099] RDX: ffffb593c2b8f804 RSI: ffffb593c2b8f7e0 RDI: ffff9e3c8e758400\n[ 181.844105] RBP: ffffb593c2b8f7b8 R08: ffffb593c2b8f9c8 R09: ffffb593c2b8f96c\n[ 181.844110] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffb593c2b8f9c8\n[ 181.844115] R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffff9e3c88000000 R15: 0000000000000005\n[ 181.844121] FS: 00007c6e323bb5c0(0000) GS:ffff9e3f85f80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n[ 181.844128] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n[ 181.844134] CR2: ffffffffffffffd6 CR3: 0000000140fbe000 CR4: 00000000003506e0\n[ 181.844141] Call Trace:\n[ 181.844146] \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n[ 181.844153] ? show_regs+0x6d/0x80\n[ 181.844167] ? __die+0x24/0x80\n[ 181.844179] ? page_fault_oops+0x99/0x1b0\n[ 181.844192] ? do_user_addr_fault+0x31d/0x6b0\n[ 181.844204] ? exc_page_fault+0x83/0x1b0\n[ 181.844216] ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x27/0x30\n[ 181.844237] dcn20_get_dcc_compression_cap+0x23/0x30 [amdgpu]\n[ 181.845115] amdgpu_dm_plane_validate_dcc.constprop.0+0xe5/0x180 [amdgpu]\n[ 181.845985] amdgpu_dm_plane_fill_plane_buffer_attributes+0x300/0x580 [amdgpu]\n[ 181.846848] fill_dc_plane_info_and_addr+0x258/0x350 [amdgpu]\n[ 181.847734] fill_dc_plane_attributes+0x162/0x350 [amdgpu]\n[ 181.848748] dm_update_plane_state.constprop.0+0x4e3/0x6b0 [amdgpu]\n[ 181.849791] ? dm_update_plane_state.constprop.0+0x4e3/0x6b0 [amdgpu]\n[ 181.850840] amdgpu_dm_atomic_check+0xdfe/0x1760 [amdgpu](CVE-2024-43899)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmedia: xc2028: avoid use-after-free in load_firmware_cb()\r\n\r\nsyzkaller reported use-after-free in load_firmware_cb() [1].\nThe reason is because the module allocated a struct tuner in tuner_probe(),\nand then the module initialization failed, the struct tuner was released.\nA worker which created during module initialization accesses this struct\ntuner later, it caused use-after-free.\r\n\r\nThe process is as follows:\r\n\r\ntask-6504 worker_thread\ntuner_probe \u0026lt;= alloc dvb_frontend [2]\n...\nrequest_firmware_nowait \u0026lt;= create a worker\n...\ntuner_remove \u0026lt;= free dvb_frontend\n...\n request_firmware_work_func \u0026lt;= the firmware is ready\n load_firmware_cb \u0026lt;= but now the dvb_frontend has been freed\r\n\r\nTo fix the issue, check the dvd_frontend in load_firmware_cb(), if it is\nnull, report a warning and just return.\r\n\r\n[1]:\n ==================================================================\n BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in load_firmware_cb+0x1310/0x17a0\n Read of size 8 at addr ffff8000d7ca2308 by task kworker/2:3/6504\r\n\r\n Call trace:\n load_firmware_cb+0x1310/0x17a0\n request_firmware_work_func+0x128/0x220\n process_one_work+0x770/0x1824\n worker_thread+0x488/0xea0\n kthread+0x300/0x430\n ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20\r\n\r\n Allocated by task 6504:\n kzalloc\n tuner_probe+0xb0/0x1430\n i2c_device_probe+0x92c/0xaf0\n really_probe+0x678/0xcd0\n driver_probe_device+0x280/0x370\n __device_attach_driver+0x220/0x330\n bus_for_each_drv+0x134/0x1c0\n __device_attach+0x1f4/0x410\n device_initial_probe+0x20/0x30\n bus_probe_device+0x184/0x200\n device_add+0x924/0x12c0\n device_register+0x24/0x30\n i2c_new_device+0x4e0/0xc44\n v4l2_i2c_new_subdev_board+0xbc/0x290\n v4l2_i2c_new_subdev+0xc8/0x104\n em28xx_v4l2_init+0x1dd0/0x3770\r\n\r\n Freed by task 6504:\n kfree+0x238/0x4e4\n tuner_remove+0x144/0x1c0\n i2c_device_remove+0xc8/0x290\n __device_release_driver+0x314/0x5fc\n device_release_driver+0x30/0x44\n bus_remove_device+0x244/0x490\n device_del+0x350/0x900\n device_unregister+0x28/0xd0\n i2c_unregister_device+0x174/0x1d0\n v4l2_device_unregister+0x224/0x380\n em28xx_v4l2_init+0x1d90/0x3770\r\n\r\n The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff8000d7ca2000\n which belongs to the cache kmalloc-2k of size 2048\n The buggy address is located 776 bytes inside of\n 2048-byte region [ffff8000d7ca2000, ffff8000d7ca2800)\n The buggy address belongs to the page:\n page:ffff7fe00035f280 count:1 mapcount:0 mapping:ffff8000c001f000 index:0x0\n flags: 0x7ff800000000100(slab)\n raw: 07ff800000000100 ffff7fe00049d880 0000000300000003 ffff8000c001f000\n raw: 0000000000000000 0000000080100010 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000\n page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected\r\n\r\n Memory state around the buggy address:\n ffff8000d7ca2200: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb\n ffff8000d7ca2280: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb\n \u0026gt;ffff8000d7ca2300: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb\n ^\n ffff8000d7ca2380: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb\n ffff8000d7ca2400: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb\n ==================================================================\r\n\r\n[2]\n Actually, it is allocated for struct tuner, and dvb_frontend is inside.(CVE-2024-43900)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amd/display: Add null checker before passing variables\r\n\r\nChecks null pointer before passing variables to functions.\r\n\r\nThis fixes 3 NULL_RETURNS issues reported by Coverity.(CVE-2024-43902)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amd/pm: Fix the null pointer dereference for vega10_hwmgr\r\n\r\nCheck return value and conduct null pointer handling to avoid null pointer dereference.(CVE-2024-43905)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/admgpu: fix dereferencing null pointer context\r\n\r\nWhen user space sets an invalid ta type, the pointer context will be empty.\nSo it need to check the pointer context before using it(CVE-2024-43906)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amdgpu/pm: Fix the null pointer dereference in apply_state_adjust_rules\r\n\r\nCheck the pointer value to fix potential null pointer\ndereference(CVE-2024-43907)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amdgpu: Fix the null pointer dereference to ras_manager\r\n\r\nCheck ras_manager before using it(CVE-2024-43908)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amdgpu/pm: Fix the null pointer dereference for smu7\r\n\r\noptimize the code to avoid pass a null pointer (hwmgr-\u0026gt;backend)\nto function smu7_update_edc_leakage_table.(CVE-2024-43909)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nwifi: nl80211: disallow setting special AP channel widths\r\n\r\nSetting the AP channel width is meant for use with the normal\n20/40/... MHz channel width progression, and switching around\nin S1G or narrow channels isn\u0026apos;t supported. Disallow that.(CVE-2024-43912)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnvme: apple: fix device reference counting\r\n\r\nDrivers must call nvme_uninit_ctrl after a successful nvme_init_ctrl.\nSplit the allocation side out to make the error handling boundary easier\nto navigate. The apple driver had been doing this wrong, leaking the\ncontroller device memory on a tagset failure.(CVE-2024-43913)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmd/raid5: avoid BUG_ON() while continue reshape after reassembling\r\n\r\nCurrently, mdadm support --revert-reshape to abort the reshape while\nreassembling, as the test 07revert-grow. However, following BUG_ON()\ncan be triggerred by the test:\r\n\r\nkernel BUG at drivers/md/raid5.c:6278!\ninvalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI\nirq event stamp: 158985\nCPU: 6 PID: 891 Comm: md0_reshape Not tainted 6.9.0-03335-g7592a0b0049a #94\nRIP: 0010:reshape_request+0x3f1/0xe60\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n raid5_sync_request+0x43d/0x550\n md_do_sync+0xb7a/0x2110\n md_thread+0x294/0x2b0\n kthread+0x147/0x1c0\n ret_from_fork+0x59/0x70\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\r\n\r\nRoot cause is that --revert-reshape update the raid_disks from 5 to 4,\nwhile reshape position is still set, and after reassembling the array,\nreshape position will be read from super block, then during reshape the\nchecking of \u0026apos;writepos\u0026apos; that is caculated by old reshape position will\nfail.\r\n\r\nFix this panic the easy way first, by converting the BUG_ON() to\nWARN_ON(), and stop the reshape if checkings fail.\r\n\r\nNoted that mdadm must fix --revert-shape as well, and probably md/raid\nshould enhance metadata validation as well, however this means\nreassemble will fail and there must be user tools to fix the wrong\nmetadata.(CVE-2024-43914)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: bridge: mcast: wait for previous gc cycles when removing port\r\n\r\nsyzbot hit a use-after-free[1] which is caused because the bridge doesn\u0026apos;t\nmake sure that all previous garbage has been collected when removing a\nport. What happens is:\n CPU 1 CPU 2\n start gc cycle remove port\n acquire gc lock first\n wait for lock\n call br_multicasg_gc() directly\n acquire lock now but free port\n the port can be freed\n while grp timers still\n running\r\n\r\nMake sure all previous gc cycles have finished by using flush_work before\nfreeing the port.\r\n\r\n[1]\n BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in br_multicast_port_group_expired+0x4c0/0x550 net/bridge/br_multicast.c:861\n Read of size 8 at addr ffff888071d6d000 by task syz.5.1232/9699\r\n\r\n CPU: 1 PID: 9699 Comm: syz.5.1232 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc5-syzkaller-00021-g24ca36a562d6 #0\n Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 06/07/2024\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;IRQ\u0026gt;\n __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]\n dump_stack_lvl+0x116/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:114\n print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [inline]\n print_report+0xc3/0x620 mm/kasan/report.c:488\n kasan_report+0xd9/0x110 mm/kasan/report.c:601\n br_multicast_port_group_expired+0x4c0/0x550 net/bridge/br_multicast.c:861\n call_timer_fn+0x1a3/0x610 kernel/time/timer.c:1792\n expire_timers kernel/time/timer.c:1843 [inline]\n __run_timers+0x74b/0xaf0 kernel/time/timer.c:2417\n __run_timer_base kernel/time/timer.c:2428 [inline]\n __run_timer_base kernel/time/timer.c:2421 [inline]\n run_timer_base+0x111/0x190 kernel/time/timer.c:2437(CVE-2024-44934)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nsctp: Fix null-ptr-deref in reuseport_add_sock().\r\n\r\nsyzbot reported a null-ptr-deref while accessing sk2-\u0026gt;sk_reuseport_cb in\nreuseport_add_sock(). [0]\r\n\r\nThe repro first creates a listener with SO_REUSEPORT. Then, it creates\nanother listener on the same port and concurrently closes the first\nlistener.\r\n\r\nThe second listen() calls reuseport_add_sock() with the first listener as\nsk2, where sk2-\u0026gt;sk_reuseport_cb is not expected to be cleared concurrently,\nbut the close() does clear it by reuseport_detach_sock().\r\n\r\nThe problem is SCTP does not properly synchronise reuseport_alloc(),\nreuseport_add_sock(), and reuseport_detach_sock().\r\n\r\nThe caller of reuseport_alloc() and reuseport_{add,detach}_sock() must\nprovide synchronisation for sockets that are classified into the same\nreuseport group.\r\n\r\nOtherwise, such sockets form multiple identical reuseport groups, and\nall groups except one would be silently dead.\r\n\r\n 1. Two sockets call listen() concurrently\n 2. No socket in the same group found in sctp_ep_hashtable[]\n 3. Two sockets call reuseport_alloc() and form two reuseport groups\n 4. Only one group hit first in __sctp_rcv_lookup_endpoint() receives\n incoming packets\r\n\r\nAlso, the reported null-ptr-deref could occur.\r\n\r\nTCP/UDP guarantees that would not happen by holding the hash bucket lock.\r\n\r\nLet\u0026apos;s apply the locking strategy to __sctp_hash_endpoint() and\n__sctp_unhash_endpoint().\r\n\r\n[0]:\nOops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000002: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI\nKASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000010-0x0000000000000017]\nCPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 10230 Comm: syz-executor119 Not tainted 6.10.0-syzkaller-12585-g301927d2d2eb #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 06/27/2024\nRIP: 0010:reuseport_add_sock+0x27e/0x5e0 net/core/sock_reuseport.c:350\nCode: 00 0f b7 5d 00 bf 01 00 00 00 89 de e8 1b a4 ff f7 83 fb 01 0f 85 a3 01 00 00 e8 6d a0 ff f7 49 8d 7e 12 48 89 f8 48 c1 e8 03 \u0026lt;42\u0026gt; 0f b6 04 28 84 c0 0f 85 4b 02 00 00 41 0f b7 5e 12 49 8d 7e 14\nRSP: 0018:ffffc9000b947c98 EFLAGS: 00010202\nRAX: 0000000000000002 RBX: ffff8880252ddf98 RCX: ffff888079478000\nRDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: 0000000000000012\nRBP: 0000000000000001 R08: ffffffff8993e18d R09: 1ffffffff1fef385\nR10: dffffc0000000000 R11: fffffbfff1fef386 R12: ffff8880252ddac0\nR13: dffffc0000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000\nFS: 00007f24e45b96c0(0000) GS:ffff8880b9300000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: 00007ffcced5f7b8 CR3: 00000000241be000 CR4: 00000000003506f0\nDR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\n DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n __sctp_hash_endpoint net/sctp/input.c:762 [inline]\n sctp_hash_endpoint+0x52a/0x600 net/sctp/input.c:790\n sctp_listen_start net/sctp/socket.c:8570 [inline]\n sctp_inet_listen+0x767/0xa20 net/sctp/socket.c:8625\n __sys_listen_socket net/socket.c:1883 [inline]\n __sys_listen+0x1b7/0x230 net/socket.c:1894\n __do_sys_listen net/socket.c:1902 [inline]\n __se_sys_listen net/socket.c:1900 [inline]\n __x64_sys_listen+0x5a/0x70 net/socket.c:1900\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f\nRIP: 0033:0x7f24e46039b9\nCode: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 91 1a 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 \u0026lt;48\u0026gt; 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48\nRSP: 002b:00007f24e45b9228 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000032\nRAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f24e468e428 RCX: 00007f24e46039b9\nRDX: 00007f24e46039b9 RSI: 0000000000000003 RDI: 0000000000000004\nRBP: 00007f24e468e420 R08: 00007f24e45b96c0 R09: 00007f24e45b96c0\nR10: 00007f24e45b96c0 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f24e468e42c\nR13:\n---truncated---(CVE-2024-44935)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nfou: remove warn in gue_gro_receive on unsupported protocol\r\n\r\nDrop the WARN_ON_ONCE inn gue_gro_receive if the encapsulated type is\nnot known or does not have a GRO handler.\r\n\r\nSuch a packet is easily constructed. Syzbot generates them and sets\noff this warning.\r\n\r\nRemove the warning as it is expected and not actionable.\r\n\r\nThe warning was previously reduced from WARN_ON to WARN_ON_ONCE in\ncommit 270136613bf7 (\u0026quot;fou: Do WARN_ON_ONCE in gue_gro_receive for bad\nproto callbacks\u0026quot;).(CVE-2024-44940)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nf2fs: fix to do sanity check on F2FS_INLINE_DATA flag in inode during GC\r\n\r\nsyzbot reports a f2fs bug as below:\r\n\r\n------------[ cut here ]------------\nkernel BUG at fs/f2fs/inline.c:258!\nCPU: 1 PID: 34 Comm: kworker/u8:2 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc6-syzkaller-00012-g9e4bc4bcae01 #0\nRIP: 0010:f2fs_write_inline_data+0x781/0x790 fs/f2fs/inline.c:258\nCall Trace:\n f2fs_write_single_data_page+0xb65/0x1d60 fs/f2fs/data.c:2834\n f2fs_write_cache_pages fs/f2fs/data.c:3133 [inline]\n __f2fs_write_data_pages fs/f2fs/data.c:3288 [inline]\n f2fs_write_data_pages+0x1efe/0x3a90 fs/f2fs/data.c:3315\n do_writepages+0x35b/0x870 mm/page-writeback.c:2612\n __writeback_single_inode+0x165/0x10b0 fs/fs-writeback.c:1650\n writeback_sb_inodes+0x905/0x1260 fs/fs-writeback.c:1941\n wb_writeback+0x457/0xce0 fs/fs-writeback.c:2117\n wb_do_writeback fs/fs-writeback.c:2264 [inline]\n wb_workfn+0x410/0x1090 fs/fs-writeback.c:2304\n process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3254 [inline]\n process_scheduled_works+0xa12/0x17c0 kernel/workqueue.c:3335\n worker_thread+0x86d/0xd70 kernel/workqueue.c:3416\n kthread+0x2f2/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:388\n ret_from_fork+0x4d/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147\n ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244\r\n\r\nThe root cause is: inline_data inode can be fuzzed, so that there may\nbe valid blkaddr in its direct node, once f2fs triggers background GC\nto migrate the block, it will hit f2fs_bug_on() during dirty page\nwriteback.\r\n\r\nLet\u0026apos;s add sanity check on F2FS_INLINE_DATA flag in inode during GC,\nso that, it can forbid migrating inline_data inode\u0026apos;s data block for\nfixing.(CVE-2024-44942)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nkcm: Serialise kcm_sendmsg() for the same socket.\r\n\r\nsyzkaller reported UAF in kcm_release(). [0]\r\n\r\nThe scenario is\r\n\r\n 1. Thread A builds a skb with MSG_MORE and sets kcm-\u0026gt;seq_skb.\r\n\r\n 2. Thread A resumes building skb from kcm-\u0026gt;seq_skb but is blocked\n by sk_stream_wait_memory()\r\n\r\n 3. Thread B calls sendmsg() concurrently, finishes building kcm-\u0026gt;seq_skb\n and puts the skb to the write queue\r\n\r\n 4. Thread A faces an error and finally frees skb that is already in the\n write queue\r\n\r\n 5. kcm_release() does double-free the skb in the write queue\r\n\r\nWhen a thread is building a MSG_MORE skb, another thread must not touch it.\r\n\r\nLet\u0026apos;s add a per-sk mutex and serialise kcm_sendmsg().\r\n\r\n[0]:\nBUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __skb_unlink include/linux/skbuff.h:2366 [inline]\nBUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __skb_dequeue include/linux/skbuff.h:2385 [inline]\nBUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __skb_queue_purge_reason include/linux/skbuff.h:3175 [inline]\nBUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __skb_queue_purge include/linux/skbuff.h:3181 [inline]\nBUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in kcm_release+0x170/0x4c8 net/kcm/kcmsock.c:1691\nRead of size 8 at addr ffff0000ced0fc80 by task syz-executor329/6167\r\n\r\nCPU: 1 PID: 6167 Comm: syz-executor329 Tainted: G B 6.8.0-rc5-syzkaller-g9abbc24128bc #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/25/2024\nCall trace:\n dump_backtrace+0x1b8/0x1e4 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:291\n show_stack+0x2c/0x3c arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:298\n __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]\n dump_stack_lvl+0xd0/0x124 lib/dump_stack.c:106\n print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:377 [inline]\n print_report+0x178/0x518 mm/kasan/report.c:488\n kasan_report+0xd8/0x138 mm/kasan/report.c:601\n __asan_report_load8_noabort+0x20/0x2c mm/kasan/report_generic.c:381\n __skb_unlink include/linux/skbuff.h:2366 [inline]\n __skb_dequeue include/linux/skbuff.h:2385 [inline]\n __skb_queue_purge_reason include/linux/skbuff.h:3175 [inline]\n __skb_queue_purge include/linux/skbuff.h:3181 [inline]\n kcm_release+0x170/0x4c8 net/kcm/kcmsock.c:1691\n __sock_release net/socket.c:659 [inline]\n sock_close+0xa4/0x1e8 net/socket.c:1421\n __fput+0x30c/0x738 fs/file_table.c:376\n ____fput+0x20/0x30 fs/file_table.c:404\n task_work_run+0x230/0x2e0 kernel/task_work.c:180\n exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:38 [inline]\n do_exit+0x618/0x1f64 kernel/exit.c:871\n do_group_exit+0x194/0x22c kernel/exit.c:1020\n get_signal+0x1500/0x15ec kernel/signal.c:2893\n do_signal+0x23c/0x3b44 arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c:1249\n do_notify_resume+0x74/0x1f4 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:148\n exit_to_user_mode_prepare arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:169 [inline]\n exit_to_user_mode arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:178 [inline]\n el0_svc+0xac/0x168 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:713\n el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xfc arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:730\n el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:598\r\n\r\nAllocated by task 6166:\n kasan_save_stack mm/kasan/common.c:47 [inline]\n kasan_save_track+0x40/0x78 mm/kasan/common.c:68\n kasan_save_alloc_info+0x70/0x84 mm/kasan/generic.c:626\n unpoison_slab_object mm/kasan/common.c:314 [inline]\n __kasan_slab_alloc+0x74/0x8c mm/kasan/common.c:340\n kasan_slab_alloc include/linux/kasan.h:201 [inline]\n slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3813 [inline]\n slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3860 [inline]\n kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x204/0x4c0 mm/slub.c:3903\n __alloc_skb+0x19c/0x3d8 net/core/skbuff.c:641\n alloc_skb include/linux/skbuff.h:1296 [inline]\n kcm_sendmsg+0x1d3c/0x2124 net/kcm/kcmsock.c:783\n sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]\n __sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:745 [inline]\n sock_sendmsg+0x220/0x2c0 net/socket.c:768\n splice_to_socket+0x7cc/0xd58 fs/splice.c:889\n do_splice_from fs/splice.c:941 [inline]\n direct_splice_actor+0xec/0x1d8 fs/splice.c:1164\n splice_direct_to_actor+0x438/0xa0c fs/splice.c:1108\n do_splice_direct_actor \n---truncated---(CVE-2024-44946)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nfuse: Initialize beyond-EOF page contents before setting uptodate\r\n\r\nfuse_notify_store(), unlike fuse_do_readpage(), does not enable page\nzeroing (because it can be used to change partial page contents).\r\n\r\nSo fuse_notify_store() must be more careful to fully initialize page\ncontents (including parts of the page that are beyond end-of-file)\nbefore marking the page uptodate.\r\n\r\nThe current code can leave beyond-EOF page contents uninitialized, which\nmakes these uninitialized page contents visible to userspace via mmap().\r\n\r\nThis is an information leak, but only affects systems which do not\nenable init-on-alloc (via CONFIG_INIT_ON_ALLOC_DEFAULT_ON=y or the\ncorresponding kernel command line parameter).(CVE-2024-44947)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amdgpu: Forward soft recovery errors to userspace\r\n\r\nAs we discussed before[1], soft recovery should be\nforwarded to userspace, or we can get into a really\nbad state where apps will keep submitting hanging\ncommand buffers cascading us to a hard reset.\r\n\r\n1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/bf23d5ed-9a6b-43e7-84ee-8cbfd0d60f18@froggi.es/\n(cherry picked from commit 434967aadbbbe3ad9103cc29e9a327de20fdba01)(CVE-2024-44961)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbinfmt_flat: Fix corruption when not offsetting data start\r\n\r\nCommit 04d82a6d0881 (\u0026quot;binfmt_flat: allow not offsetting data start\u0026quot;)\nintroduced a RISC-V specific variant of the FLAT format which does\nnot allocate any space for the (obsolete) array of shared library\npointers. However, it did not disable the code which initializes the\narray, resulting in the corruption of sizeof(long) bytes before the DATA\nsegment, generally the end of the TEXT segment.\r\n\r\nIntroduce MAX_SHARED_LIBS_UPDATE which depends on the state of\nCONFIG_BINFMT_FLAT_NO_DATA_START_OFFSET to guard the initialization of\nthe shared library pointer region so that it will only be initialized\nif space is reserved for it.(CVE-2024-44966)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: dsa: bcm_sf2: Fix a possible memory leak in bcm_sf2_mdio_register()\r\n\r\nbcm_sf2_mdio_register() calls of_phy_find_device() and then\nphy_device_remove() in a loop to remove existing PHY devices.\nof_phy_find_device() eventually calls bus_find_device(), which calls\nget_device() on the returned struct device * to increment the refcount.\nThe current implementation does not decrement the refcount, which causes\nmemory leak.\r\n\r\nThis commit adds the missing phy_device_free() call to decrement the\nrefcount via put_device() to balance the refcount.(CVE-2024-44971)",
"id": "OESA-2024-2124",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:07:36Z",
"published": "2024-09-14T11:07:36Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2024-2124"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36934"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-37078"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40959"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40976"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40978"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41012"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41016"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41037"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41052"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41071"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41082"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41098"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42139"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42152"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42153"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42234"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42235"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42237"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42238"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42239"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42240"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42241"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42243"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42248"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42250"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42253"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42258"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42259"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42271"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42272"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42276"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42277"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42279"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42291"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42294"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42296"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42298"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42303"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42307"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42314"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42315"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42316"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42317"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42320"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42321"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43817"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43818"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43821"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43825"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43826"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43829"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43832"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43833"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43837"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43841"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43842"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43845"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43846"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43847"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43849"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43850"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43851"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43855"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43856"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43859"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43883"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43884"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43889"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43890"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43891"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43895"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43897"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43898"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43899"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43900"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43902"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43905"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43906"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43907"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43908"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43909"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43912"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43913"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43914"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-44934"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-44935"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-44940"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-44942"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-44946"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-44947"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-44961"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-44966"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-44971"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2024-36934",
"CVE-2024-37078",
"CVE-2024-40959",
"CVE-2024-40976",
"CVE-2024-40978",
"CVE-2024-41012",
"CVE-2024-41016",
"CVE-2024-41037",
"CVE-2024-41052",
"CVE-2024-41071",
"CVE-2024-41082",
"CVE-2024-41098",
"CVE-2024-42139",
"CVE-2024-42152",
"CVE-2024-42153",
"CVE-2024-42234",
"CVE-2024-42235",
"CVE-2024-42237",
"CVE-2024-42238",
"CVE-2024-42239",
"CVE-2024-42240",
"CVE-2024-42241",
"CVE-2024-42243",
"CVE-2024-42248",
"CVE-2024-42250",
"CVE-2024-42253",
"CVE-2024-42258",
"CVE-2024-42259",
"CVE-2024-42271",
"CVE-2024-42272",
"CVE-2024-42276",
"CVE-2024-42277",
"CVE-2024-42279",
"CVE-2024-42291",
"CVE-2024-42294",
"CVE-2024-42296",
"CVE-2024-42298",
"CVE-2024-42303",
"CVE-2024-42307",
"CVE-2024-42314",
"CVE-2024-42315",
"CVE-2024-42316",
"CVE-2024-42317",
"CVE-2024-42320",
"CVE-2024-42321",
"CVE-2024-43817",
"CVE-2024-43818",
"CVE-2024-43821",
"CVE-2024-43825",
"CVE-2024-43826",
"CVE-2024-43829",
"CVE-2024-43832",
"CVE-2024-43833",
"CVE-2024-43837",
"CVE-2024-43841",
"CVE-2024-43842",
"CVE-2024-43845",
"CVE-2024-43846",
"CVE-2024-43847",
"CVE-2024-43849",
"CVE-2024-43850",
"CVE-2024-43851",
"CVE-2024-43855",
"CVE-2024-43856",
"CVE-2024-43859",
"CVE-2024-43883",
"CVE-2024-43884",
"CVE-2024-43889",
"CVE-2024-43890",
"CVE-2024-43891",
"CVE-2024-43895",
"CVE-2024-43897",
"CVE-2024-43898",
"CVE-2024-43899",
"CVE-2024-43900",
"CVE-2024-43902",
"CVE-2024-43905",
"CVE-2024-43906",
"CVE-2024-43907",
"CVE-2024-43908",
"CVE-2024-43909",
"CVE-2024-43912",
"CVE-2024-43913",
"CVE-2024-43914",
"CVE-2024-44934",
"CVE-2024-44935",
"CVE-2024-44940",
"CVE-2024-44942",
"CVE-2024-44946",
"CVE-2024-44947",
"CVE-2024-44961",
"CVE-2024-44966",
"CVE-2024-44971"
]
}
OESA-2024-2292 (CVE-2024-27030)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2024-10-25 11:07 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:07 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
octeontx2-af: Use separate handlers for interrupts
For PF to AF interrupt vector and VF to AF vector same interrupt handler is registered which is causing race condition. When two interrupts are raised to two CPUs at same time then two cores serve same event corrupting the data.(CVE-2024-27030)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
media: go7007: fix a memleak in go7007_load_encoder
In go7007_load_encoder, bounce(i.e. go->boot_fw), is allocated without a deallocation thereafter. After the following call chain:
saa7134_go7007_init |-> go7007_boot_encoder |-> go7007_load_encoder |-> kfree(go)
go is freed and thus bounce is leaked.(CVE-2024-27074)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: nf_tables: use timestamp to check for set element timeout
Add a timestamp field at the beginning of the transaction, store it in the nftables per-netns area.
Update set backend .insert, .deactivate and sync gc path to use the timestamp, this avoids that an element expires while control plane transaction is still unfinished.
.lookup and .update, which are used from packet path, still use the current time to check if the element has expired. And .get path and dump also since this runs lockless under rcu read size lock. Then, there is async gc which also needs to check the current time since it runs asynchronously from a workqueue.(CVE-2024-27397)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tee: optee: Fix kernel panic caused by incorrect error handling
The error path while failing to register devices on the TEE bus has a bug leading to kernel panic as follows:
[ 15.398930] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffff07ed00626d7c [ 15.406913] Mem abort info: [ 15.409722] ESR = 0x0000000096000005 [ 15.413490] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits [ 15.418814] SET = 0, FnV = 0 [ 15.421878] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 [ 15.425031] FSC = 0x05: level 1 translation fault [ 15.429922] Data abort info: [ 15.432813] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000005, ISS2 = 0x00000000 [ 15.438310] CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0 [ 15.443372] GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0 [ 15.448697] swapper pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=00000000d9e3e000 [ 15.455413] [ffff07ed00626d7c] pgd=1800000bffdf9003, p4d=1800000bffdf9003, pud=0000000000000000 [ 15.464146] Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000005 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
Commit 7269cba53d90 ("tee: optee: Fix supplicant based device enumeration") lead to the introduction of this bug. So fix it appropriately.(CVE-2024-35785)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/lima: fix a memleak in lima_heap_alloc
When lima_vm_map_bo fails, the resources need to be deallocated, or there will be memleaks.(CVE-2024-35829)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/sched: taprio: extend minimum interval restriction to entire cycle too
It is possible for syzbot to side-step the restriction imposed by the blamed commit in the Fixes: tag, because the taprio UAPI permits a cycle-time different from (and potentially shorter than) the sum of entry intervals.
We need one more restriction, which is that the cycle time itself must be larger than N * ETH_ZLEN bit times, where N is the number of schedule entries. This restriction needs to apply regardless of whether the cycle time came from the user or was the implicit, auto-calculated value, so we move the existing "cycle == 0" check outside the "if "(!new->cycle_time)" branch. This way covers both conditions and scenarios.
Add a selftest which illustrates the issue triggered by syzbot.(CVE-2024-36244)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
usb: gadget: f_fs: Fix race between aio_cancel() and AIO request complete
FFS based applications can utilize the aio_cancel() callback to dequeue pending USB requests submitted to the UDC. There is a scenario where the FFS application issues an AIO cancel call, while the UDC is handling a soft disconnect. For a DWC3 based implementation, the callstack looks like the following:
DWC3 Gadget FFS Application
dwc3_gadget_soft_disconnect() ... --> dwc3_stop_active_transfers() --> dwc3_gadget_giveback(-ESHUTDOWN) --> ffs_epfile_async_io_complete() ffs_aio_cancel() --> usb_ep_free_request() --> usb_ep_dequeue()
There is currently no locking implemented between the AIO completion handler and AIO cancel, so the issue occurs if the completion routine is running in parallel to an AIO cancel call coming from the FFS application. As the completion call frees the USB request (io_data->req) the FFS application is also referencing it for the usb_ep_dequeue() call. This can lead to accessing a stale/hanging pointer.
commit b566d38857fc ("usb: gadget: f_fs: use io_data->status consistently") relocated the usb_ep_free_request() into ffs_epfile_async_io_complete(). However, in order to properly implement locking to mitigate this issue, the spinlock can't be added to ffs_epfile_async_io_complete(), as usb_ep_dequeue() (if successfully dequeuing a USB request) will call the function driver's completion handler in the same context. Hence, leading into a deadlock.
Fix this issue by moving the usb_ep_free_request() back to ffs_user_copy_worker(), and ensuring that it explicitly sets io_data->req to NULL after freeing it within the ffs->eps_lock. This resolves the race condition above, as the ffs_aio_cancel() routine will not continue attempting to dequeue a request that has already been freed, or the ffs_user_copy_work() not freeing the USB request until the AIO cancel is done referencing it.
This fix depends on commit b566d38857fc ("usb: gadget: f_fs: use io_data->status consistently")(CVE-2024-36894)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipv4: Fix uninit-value access in __ip_make_skb()
KMSAN reported uninit-value access in __ip_make_skb() [1]. __ip_make_skb() tests HDRINCL to know if the skb has icmphdr. However, HDRINCL can cause a race condition. If calling setsockopt(2) with IP_HDRINCL changes HDRINCL while __ip_make_skb() is running, the function will access icmphdr in the skb even if it is not included. This causes the issue reported by KMSAN.
Check FLOWI_FLAG_KNOWN_NH on fl4->flowi4_flags instead of testing HDRINCL on the socket.
Also, fl4->fl4_icmp_type and fl4->fl4_icmp_code are not initialized. These are union in struct flowi4 and are implicitly initialized by flowi4_init_output(), but we should not rely on specific union layout.
Initialize these explicitly in raw_sendmsg().
[1] BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in __ip_make_skb+0x2b74/0x2d20 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:1481 __ip_make_skb+0x2b74/0x2d20 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:1481 ip_finish_skb include/net/ip.h:243 [inline] ip_push_pending_frames+0x4c/0x5c0 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:1508 raw_sendmsg+0x2381/0x2690 net/ipv4/raw.c:654 inet_sendmsg+0x27b/0x2a0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:851 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline] __sock_sendmsg+0x274/0x3c0 net/socket.c:745 __sys_sendto+0x62c/0x7b0 net/socket.c:2191 __do_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2203 [inline] __se_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2199 [inline] __x64_sys_sendto+0x130/0x200 net/socket.c:2199 do_syscall_64+0xd8/0x1f0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75
Uninit was created at: slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3804 [inline] slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3845 [inline] kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x5f6/0xc50 mm/slub.c:3888 kmalloc_reserve+0x13c/0x4a0 net/core/skbuff.c:577 __alloc_skb+0x35a/0x7c0 net/core/skbuff.c:668 alloc_skb include/linux/skbuff.h:1318 [inline] __ip_append_data+0x49ab/0x68c0 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:1128 ip_append_data+0x1e7/0x260 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:1365 raw_sendmsg+0x22b1/0x2690 net/ipv4/raw.c:648 inet_sendmsg+0x27b/0x2a0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:851 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline] __sock_sendmsg+0x274/0x3c0 net/socket.c:745 __sys_sendto+0x62c/0x7b0 net/socket.c:2191 __do_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2203 [inline] __se_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2199 [inline] __x64_sys_sendto+0x130/0x200 net/socket.c:2199 do_syscall_64+0xd8/0x1f0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75
CPU: 1 PID: 15709 Comm: syz-executor.7 Not tainted 6.8.0-11567-gb3603fcb79b1 #25 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-1.fc39 04/01/2014(CVE-2024-36927)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: nl80211: don't free NULL coalescing rule
If the parsing fails, we can dereference a NULL pointer here.(CVE-2024-36941)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/mlx5e: Fix netif state handling
mlx5e_suspend cleans resources only if netif_device_present() returns true. However, mlx5e_resume changes the state of netif, via mlx5e_nic_enable, only if reg_state == NETREG_REGISTERED. In the below case, the above leads to NULL-ptr Oops[1] and memory leaks:
mlx5e_probe _mlx5e_resume mlx5e_attach_netdev mlx5e_nic_enable <-- netdev not reg, not calling netif_device_attach() register_netdev <-- failed for some reason. ERROR_FLOW: _mlx5e_suspend <-- netif_device_present return false, resources aren't freed :(
Hence, clean resources in this case as well.
[1] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000 PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0010 [#1] SMP CPU: 2 PID: 9345 Comm: test-ovs-ct-gen Not tainted 6.5.0_for_upstream_min_debug_2023_09_05_16_01 #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:0x0 Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at0xffffffffffffffd6. RSP: 0018:ffff888178aaf758 EFLAGS: 00010246 Call Trace: <TASK> ? __die+0x20/0x60 ? page_fault_oops+0x14c/0x3c0 ? exc_page_fault+0x75/0x140 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30 notifier_call_chain+0x35/0xb0 blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x3d/0x60 mlx5_blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x22/0x30 [mlx5_core] mlx5_core_uplink_netdev_event_replay+0x3e/0x60 [mlx5_core] mlx5_mdev_netdev_track+0x53/0x60 [mlx5_ib] mlx5_ib_roce_init+0xc3/0x340 [mlx5_ib] __mlx5_ib_add+0x34/0xd0 [mlx5_ib] mlx5r_probe+0xe1/0x210 [mlx5_ib] ? auxiliary_match_id+0x6a/0x90 auxiliary_bus_probe+0x38/0x80 ? driver_sysfs_add+0x51/0x80 really_probe+0xc9/0x3e0 ? driver_probe_device+0x90/0x90 __driver_probe_device+0x80/0x160 driver_probe_device+0x1e/0x90 __device_attach_driver+0x7d/0x100 bus_for_each_drv+0x80/0xd0 __device_attach+0xbc/0x1f0 bus_probe_device+0x86/0xa0 device_add+0x637/0x840 __auxiliary_device_add+0x3b/0xa0 add_adev+0xc9/0x140 [mlx5_core] mlx5_rescan_drivers_locked+0x22a/0x310 [mlx5_core] mlx5_register_device+0x53/0xa0 [mlx5_core] mlx5_init_one_devl_locked+0x5c4/0x9c0 [mlx5_core] mlx5_init_one+0x3b/0x60 [mlx5_core] probe_one+0x44c/0x730 [mlx5_core] local_pci_probe+0x3e/0x90 pci_device_probe+0xbf/0x210 ? kernfs_create_link+0x5d/0xa0 ? sysfs_do_create_link_sd+0x60/0xc0 really_probe+0xc9/0x3e0 ? driver_probe_device+0x90/0x90 __driver_probe_device+0x80/0x160 driver_probe_device+0x1e/0x90 __device_attach_driver+0x7d/0x100 bus_for_each_drv+0x80/0xd0 __device_attach+0xbc/0x1f0 pci_bus_add_device+0x54/0x80 pci_iov_add_virtfn+0x2e6/0x320 sriov_enable+0x208/0x420 mlx5_core_sriov_configure+0x9e/0x200 [mlx5_core] sriov_numvfs_store+0xae/0x1a0 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x10c/0x1a0 vfs_write+0x291/0x3c0 ksys_write+0x5f/0xe0 do_syscall_64+0x3d/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0 CR2: 0000000000000000 ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---(CVE-2024-38608)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipv6: sr: fix invalid unregister error path
The error path of seg6_init() is wrong in case CONFIG_IPV6_SEG6_LWTUNNEL is not defined. In that case if seg6_hmac_init() fails, the genl_unregister_family() isn't called.
This issue exist since commit 46738b1317e1 ("ipv6: sr: add option to control lwtunnel support"), and commit 5559cea2d5aa ("ipv6: sr: fix possible use-after-free and null-ptr-deref") replaced unregister_pernet_subsys() with genl_unregister_family() in this error path.(CVE-2024-38612)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
greybus: Fix use-after-free bug in gb_interface_release due to race condition.
In gb_interface_create, &intf->mode_switch_completion is bound with gb_interface_mode_switch_work. Then it will be started by gb_interface_request_mode_switch. Here is the relevant code. if (!queue_work(system_long_wq, &intf->mode_switch_work)) { ... }
If we call gb_interface_release to make cleanup, there may be an unfinished work. This function will call kfree to free the object "intf". However, if gb_interface_mode_switch_work is scheduled to run after kfree, it may cause use-after-free error as gb_interface_mode_switch_work will use the object "intf". The possible execution flow that may lead to the issue is as follows:
CPU0 CPU1
| gb_interface_create
| gb_interface_request_mode_switch
gb_interface_release | kfree(intf) (free) | | gb_interface_mode_switch_work | mutex_lock(&intf->mutex) (use)
Fix it by canceling the work before kfree.(CVE-2024-39495)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netns: Make get_net_ns() handle zero refcount net
Syzkaller hit a warning: refcount_t: addition on 0; use-after-free. WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 7890 at lib/refcount.c:25 refcount_warn_saturate+0xdf/0x1d0 Modules linked in: CPU: 3 PID: 7890 Comm: tun Not tainted 6.10.0-rc3-00100-gcaa4f9578aba-dirty #310 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:refcount_warn_saturate+0xdf/0x1d0 Code: 41 49 04 31 ff 89 de e8 9f 1e cd fe 84 db 75 9c e8 76 26 cd fe c6 05 b6 41 49 04 01 90 48 c7 c7 b8 8e 25 86 e8 d2 05 b5 fe 90 <0f> 0b 90 90 e9 79 ff ff ff e8 53 26 cd fe 0f b6 1 RSP: 0018:ffff8881067b7da0 EFLAGS: 00010286 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffffffff811c72ac RDX: ffff8881026a2140 RSI: ffffffff811c72b5 RDI: 0000000000000001 RBP: ffff8881067b7db0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 205b5d3730353139 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 205d303938375420 R12: ffff8881086500c4 R13: ffff8881086500c4 R14: ffff8881086500b0 R15: ffff888108650040 FS: 00007f5b2961a4c0(0000) GS:ffff88823bd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 000055d7ed36fd18 CR3: 00000001482f6000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> ? show_regs+0xa3/0xc0 ? __warn+0xa5/0x1c0 ? refcount_warn_saturate+0xdf/0x1d0 ? report_bug+0x1fc/0x2d0 ? refcount_warn_saturate+0xdf/0x1d0 ? handle_bug+0xa1/0x110 ? exc_invalid_op+0x3c/0xb0 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1f/0x30 ? __warn_printk+0xcc/0x140 ? __warn_printk+0xd5/0x140 ? refcount_warn_saturate+0xdf/0x1d0 get_net_ns+0xa4/0xc0 ? __pfx_get_net_ns+0x10/0x10 open_related_ns+0x5a/0x130 __tun_chr_ioctl+0x1616/0x2370 ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_switch+0x58/0xa0 ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp2+0x1c/0x30 ? __pfx_tun_chr_ioctl+0x10/0x10 tun_chr_ioctl+0x2f/0x40 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x11b/0x160 x64_sys_call+0x1211/0x20d0 do_syscall_64+0x9e/0x1d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7f5b28f165d7 Code: b3 66 90 48 8b 05 b1 48 2d 00 64 c7 00 26 00 00 00 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 81 48 2d 00 8 RSP: 002b:00007ffc2b59c5e8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f5b28f165d7 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000000054e3 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00007ffc2b59c650 R08: 00007f5b291ed8c0 R09: 00007f5b2961a4c0 R10: 0000000029690010 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000400730 R13: 00007ffc2b59cf40 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 </TASK> Kernel panic - not syncing: kernel: panic_on_warn set ...
This is trigger as below: ns0 ns1 tun_set_iff() //dev is tun0 tun->dev = dev //ip link set tun0 netns ns1 put_net() //ref is 0 __tun_chr_ioctl() //TUNGETDEVNETNS net = dev_net(tun->dev); open_related_ns(&net->ns, get_net_ns); //ns1 get_net_ns() get_net() //addition on 0
Use maybe_get_net() in get_net_ns in case net's ref is zero to fix this(CVE-2024-40958)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: qla2xxx: During vport delete send async logout explicitly
During vport delete, it is observed that during unload we hit a crash because of stale entries in outstanding command array. For all these stale I/O entries, eh_abort was issued and aborted (fast_fail_io = 2009h) but I/Os could not complete while vport delete is in process of deleting.
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 000000000000001c #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI Workqueue: qla2xxx_wq qla_do_work [qla2xxx] RIP: 0010:dma_direct_unmap_sg+0x51/0x1e0 RSP: 0018:ffffa1e1e150fc68 EFLAGS: 00010046 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000021 RCX: 0000000000000001 RDX: 0000000000000021 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff8ce208a7a0d0 RBP: ffff8ce208a7a0d0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff8ce378aac9c8 R10: ffff8ce378aac8a0 R11: ffffa1e1e150f9d8 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff8ce378aac9c8 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8d217f000000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 000000000000001c CR3: 0000002089acc000 CR4: 0000000000350ee0 Call Trace: <TASK> qla2xxx_qpair_sp_free_dma+0x417/0x4e0 ? qla2xxx_qpair_sp_compl+0x10d/0x1a0 ? qla2x00_status_entry+0x768/0x2830 ? newidle_balance+0x2f0/0x430 ? dequeue_entity+0x100/0x3c0 ? qla24xx_process_response_queue+0x6a1/0x19e0 ? __schedule+0x2d5/0x1140 ? qla_do_work+0x47/0x60 ? process_one_work+0x267/0x440 ? process_one_work+0x440/0x440 ? worker_thread+0x2d/0x3d0 ? process_one_work+0x440/0x440 ? kthread+0x156/0x180 ? set_kthread_struct+0x50/0x50 ? ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 </TASK>
Send out async logout explicitly for all the ports during vport delete.(CVE-2024-42289)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: flow_dissector: use DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE
The following splat is easy to reproduce upstream as well as in -stable kernels. Florian Westphal provided the following commit:
d1dab4f71d37 ("net: add and use __skb_get_hash_symmetric_net")
but this complementary fix has been also suggested by Willem de Bruijn and it can be easily backported to -stable kernel which consists in using DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE instead to silence the following splat given __skb_get_hash() is used by the nftables tracing infrastructure to to identify packets in traces.
[69133.561393] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [69133.561404] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 43576 at net/core/flow_dissector.c:1104 __skb_flow_dissect+0x134f/ [...] [69133.561944] CPU: 0 PID: 43576 Comm: socat Not tainted 6.10.0-rc7+ #379 [69133.561959] RIP: 0010:__skb_flow_dissect+0x134f/0x2ad0 [69133.561970] Code: 83 f9 04 0f 84 b3 00 00 00 45 85 c9 0f 84 aa 00 00 00 41 83 f9 02 0f 84 81 fc ff ff 44 0f b7 b4 24 80 00 00 00 e9 8b f9 ff ff <0f> 0b e9 20 f3 ff ff 41 f6 c6 20 0f 84 e4 ef ff ff 48 8d 7b 12 e8 [69133.561979] RSP: 0018:ffffc90000006fc0 EFLAGS: 00010246 [69133.561988] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffff82f33e20 RCX: ffffffff81ab7e19 [69133.561994] RDX: dffffc0000000000 RSI: ffffc90000007388 RDI: ffff888103a1b418 [69133.562001] RBP: ffffc90000007310 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [69133.562007] R10: ffffc90000007388 R11: ffffffff810cface R12: ffff888103a1b400 [69133.562013] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffffffff82f33e2a R15: ffffffff82f33e28 [69133.562020] FS: 00007f40f7131740(0000) GS:ffff888390800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [69133.562027] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [69133.562033] CR2: 00007f40f7346ee0 CR3: 000000015d200001 CR4: 00000000001706f0 [69133.562040] Call Trace: [69133.562044] <IRQ> [69133.562049] ? __warn+0x9f/0x1a0 [ 1211.841384] ? __skb_flow_dissect+0x107e/0x2860 [...] [ 1211.841496] ? bpf_flow_dissect+0x160/0x160 [ 1211.841753] __skb_get_hash+0x97/0x280 [ 1211.841765] ? __skb_get_hash_symmetric+0x230/0x230 [ 1211.841776] ? mod_find+0xbf/0xe0 [ 1211.841786] ? get_stack_info_noinstr+0x12/0xe0 [ 1211.841798] ? bpf_ksym_find+0x56/0xe0 [ 1211.841807] ? __rcu_read_unlock+0x2a/0x70 [ 1211.841819] nft_trace_init+0x1b9/0x1c0 [nf_tables] [ 1211.841895] ? nft_trace_notify+0x830/0x830 [nf_tables] [ 1211.841964] ? get_stack_info+0x2b/0x80 [ 1211.841975] ? nft_do_chain_arp+0x80/0x80 [nf_tables] [ 1211.842044] nft_do_chain+0x79c/0x850 nf_tables
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mlxsw: spectrum_acl_erp: Fix object nesting warning
ACLs in Spectrum-2 and newer ASICs can reside in the algorithmic TCAM (A-TCAM) or in the ordinary circuit TCAM (C-TCAM). The former can contain more ACLs (i.e., tc filters), but the number of masks in each region (i.e., tc chain) is limited.
In order to mitigate the effects of the above limitation, the device allows filters to share a single mask if their masks only differ in up to 8 consecutive bits. For example, dst_ip/25 can be represented using dst_ip/24 with a delta of 1 bit. The C-TCAM does not have a limit on the number of masks being used (and therefore does not support mask aggregation), but can contain a limited number of filters.
The driver uses the "objagg" library to perform the mask aggregation by passing it objects that consist of the filter's mask and whether the filter is to be inserted into the A-TCAM or the C-TCAM since filters in different TCAMs cannot share a mask.
The set of created objects is dependent on the insertion order of the filters and is not necessarily optimal. Therefore, the driver will periodically ask the library to compute a more optimal set ("hints") by looking at all the existing objects.
When the library asks the driver whether two objects can be aggregated the driver only compares the provided masks and ignores the A-TCAM / C-TCAM indication. This is the right thing to do since the goal is to move as many filters as possible to the A-TCAM. The driver also forbids two identical masks from being aggregated since this can only happen if one was intentionally put in the C-TCAM to avoid a conflict in the A-TCAM.
The above can result in the following set of hints:
H1: {mask X, A-TCAM} -> H2: {mask Y, A-TCAM} // X is Y + delta H3: {mask Y, C-TCAM} -> H4: {mask Z, A-TCAM} // Y is Z + delta
After getting the hints from the library the driver will start migrating filters from one region to another while consulting the computed hints and instructing the device to perform a lookup in both regions during the transition.
Assuming a filter with mask X is being migrated into the A-TCAM in the new region, the hints lookup will return H1. Since H2 is the parent of H1, the library will try to find the object associated with it and create it if necessary in which case another hints lookup (recursive) will be performed. This hints lookup for {mask Y, A-TCAM} will either return H2 or H3 since the driver passes the library an object comparison function that ignores the A-TCAM / C-TCAM indication.
This can eventually lead to nested objects which are not supported by the library [1].
Fix by removing the object comparison function from both the driver and the library as the driver was the only user. That way the lookup will only return exact matches.
I do not have a reliable reproducer that can reproduce the issue in a timely manner, but before the fix the issue would reproduce in several minutes and with the fix it does not reproduce in over an hour.
Note that the current usefulness of the hints is limited because they include the C-TCAM indication and represent aggregation that cannot actually happen. This will be addressed in net-next.
[1] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 153 at lib/objagg.c:170 objagg_obj_parent_assign+0xb5/0xd0 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 153 Comm: kworker/0:18 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc6-custom-g70fbc2c1c38b #42 Hardware name: Mellanox Technologies Ltd. MSN3700C/VMOD0008, BIOS 5.11 10/10/2018 Workqueue: mlxsw_core mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work RIP: 0010:objagg_obj_parent_assign+0xb5/0xd0 [...] Call Trace: <TASK> __objagg_obj_get+0x2bb/0x580 objagg_obj_get+0xe/0x80 mlxsw_sp_acl_erp_mask_get+0xb5/0xf0 mlxsw_sp_acl_atcam_entry_add+0xe8/0x3c0 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_entry_create+0x5e/0xa0 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vchunk_migrate_one+0x16b/0x270 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work+0xbe/0x510 process_one_work+0x151/0x370(CVE-2024-43880)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
gpio: prevent potential speculation leaks in gpio_device_get_desc()
Userspace may trigger a speculative read of an address outside the gpio descriptor array. Users can do that by calling gpio_ioctl() with an offset out of range. Offset is copied from user and then used as an array index to get the gpio descriptor without sanitization in gpio_device_get_desc().
This change ensures that the offset is sanitized by using array_index_nospec() to mitigate any possibility of speculative information leaks.
This bug was discovered and resolved using Coverity Static Analysis Security Testing (SAST) by Synopsys, Inc.(CVE-2024-44931)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
driver core: Fix uevent_show() vs driver detach race
uevent_show() wants to de-reference dev->driver->name. There is no clean way for a device attribute to de-reference dev->driver unless that attribute is defined via (struct device_driver).dev_groups. Instead, the anti-pattern of taking the device_lock() in the attribute handler risks deadlocks with code paths that remove device attributes while holding the lock.
This deadlock is typically invisible to lockdep given the device_lock() is marked lockdep_set_novalidate_class(), but some subsystems allocate a local lockdep key for @dev->mutex to reveal reports of the form:
====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.10.0-rc7+ #275 Tainted: G OE N
modprobe/2374 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8c2270070de0 (kn->active#6){++++}-{0:0}, at: __kernfs_remove+0xde/0x220
but task is already holding lock: ffff8c22016e88f8 (&cxl_root_key){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x39/0x210
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (&cxl_root_key){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x99/0xc30 uevent_show+0xac/0x130 dev_attr_show+0x18/0x40 sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xac/0xf0 seq_read_iter+0x110/0x450 vfs_read+0x25b/0x340 ksys_read+0x67/0xf0 do_syscall_64+0x75/0x190 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
-> #0 (kn->active#6){++++}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x121a/0x1fa0 lock_acquire+0xd6/0x2e0 kernfs_drain+0x1e9/0x200 __kernfs_remove+0xde/0x220 kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x5e/0xa0 device_del+0x168/0x410 device_unregister+0x13/0x60 devres_release_all+0xb8/0x110 device_unbind_cleanup+0xe/0x70 device_release_driver_internal+0x1c7/0x210 driver_detach+0x47/0x90 bus_remove_driver+0x6c/0xf0 cxl_acpi_exit+0xc/0x11 [cxl_acpi] __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x181/0x260 do_syscall_64+0x75/0x190 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
The observation though is that driver objects are typically much longer lived than device objects. It is reasonable to perform lockless de-reference of a @driver pointer even if it is racing detach from a device. Given the infrequency of driver unregistration, use synchronize_rcu() in module_remove_driver() to close any potential races. It is potentially overkill to suffer synchronize_rcu() just to handle the rare module removal racing uevent_show() event.
Thanks to Tetsuo Handa for the debug analysis of the syzbot report [1].(CVE-2024-44952)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bonding: fix xfrm real_dev null pointer dereference
We shouldn't set real_dev to NULL because packets can be in transit and xfrm might call xdo_dev_offload_ok() in parallel. All callbacks assume real_dev is set.
Example trace: kernel: BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 0000000000001030 kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): making interface the new active one kernel: #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode kernel: #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page kernel: PGD 0 P4D 0 kernel: Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT SMP kernel: CPU: 4 PID: 2237 Comm: ping Not tainted 6.7.7+ #12 kernel: Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-2.fc40 04/01/2014 kernel: RIP: 0010:nsim_ipsec_offload_ok+0xc/0x20 [netdevsim] kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): bond_ipsec_add_sa_all: failed to add SA kernel: Code: e0 0f 0b 48 83 7f 38 00 74 de 0f 0b 48 8b 47 08 48 8b 37 48 8b 78 40 e9 b2 e5 9a d7 66 90 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 8b 86 80 02 00 00 <83> 80 30 10 00 00 01 b8 01 00 00 00 c3 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 0f 1f kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): making interface the new active one kernel: RSP: 0018:ffffabde81553b98 EFLAGS: 00010246 kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): bond_ipsec_add_sa_all: failed to add SA kernel: kernel: RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff9eb404e74900 RCX: ffff9eb403d97c60 kernel: RDX: ffffffffc090de10 RSI: ffff9eb404e74900 RDI: ffff9eb3c5de9e00 kernel: RBP: ffff9eb3c0a42000 R08: 0000000000000010 R09: 0000000000000014 kernel: R10: 7974203030303030 R11: 3030303030303030 R12: 0000000000000000 kernel: R13: ffff9eb3c5de9e00 R14: ffffabde81553cc8 R15: ffff9eb404c53000 kernel: FS: 00007f2a77a3ad00(0000) GS:ffff9eb43bd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 kernel: CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 kernel: CR2: 0000000000001030 CR3: 00000001122ab000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0 kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): making interface the new active one kernel: Call Trace: kernel: <TASK> kernel: ? __die+0x1f/0x60 kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): bond_ipsec_add_sa_all: failed to add SA kernel: ? page_fault_oops+0x142/0x4c0 kernel: ? do_user_addr_fault+0x65/0x670 kernel: ? kvm_read_and_reset_apf_flags+0x3b/0x50 kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): making interface the new active one kernel: ? exc_page_fault+0x7b/0x180 kernel: ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30 kernel: ? nsim_bpf_uninit+0x50/0x50 [netdevsim] kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): bond_ipsec_add_sa_all: failed to add SA kernel: ? nsim_ipsec_offload_ok+0xc/0x20 [netdevsim] kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): making interface the new active one kernel: bond_ipsec_offload_ok+0x7b/0x90 [bonding] kernel: xfrm_output+0x61/0x3b0 kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): bond_ipsec_add_sa_all: failed to add SA kernel: ip_push_pending_frames+0x56/0x80(CVE-2024-44989)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bonding: fix null pointer deref in bond_ipsec_offload_ok
We must check if there is an active slave before dereferencing the pointer.(CVE-2024-44990)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
dmaengine: altera-msgdma: properly free descriptor in msgdma_free_descriptor
Remove list_del call in msgdma_chan_desc_cleanup, this should be the role of msgdma_free_descriptor. In consequence replace list_add_tail with list_move_tail in msgdma_free_descriptor.
This fixes the path: msgdma_free_chan_resources -> msgdma_free_descriptors -> msgdma_free_desc_list -> msgdma_free_descriptor
which does not correctly free the descriptors as first nodes were not removed from the list.(CVE-2024-46716)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: Stop amdgpu_dm initialize when stream nums greater than 6
[Why] Coverity reports OVERRUN warning. Should abort amdgpu_dm initialize.
[How] Return failure to amdgpu_dm_init.(CVE-2024-46817)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
arm64: acpi: Harden get_cpu_for_acpi_id() against missing CPU entry
In a review discussion of the changes to support vCPU hotplug where a check was added on the GICC being enabled if was online, it was noted that there is need to map back to the cpu and use that to index into a cpumask. As such, a valid ID is needed.
If an MPIDR check fails in acpi_map_gic_cpu_interface() it is possible for the entry in cpu_madt_gicc[cpu] == NULL. This function would then cause a NULL pointer dereference. Whilst a path to trigger this has not been established, harden this caller against the possibility.(CVE-2024-46822)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
platform/x86: panasonic-laptop: Fix SINF array out of bounds accesses
The panasonic laptop code in various places uses the SINF array with index values of 0 - SINF_CUR_BRIGHT(0x0d) without checking that the SINF array is big enough.
Not all panasonic laptops have this many SINF array entries, for example the Toughbook CF-18 model only has 10 SINF array entries. So it only supports the AC+DC brightness entries and mute.
Check that the SINF array has a minimum size which covers all AC+DC brightness entries and refuse to load if the SINF array is smaller.
For higher SINF indexes hide the sysfs attributes when the SINF array does not contain an entry for that attribute, avoiding show()/store() accessing the array out of bounds and add bounds checking to the probe() and resume() code accessing these.(CVE-2024-46859)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: Avoid overflow from uint32_t to uint8_t
[WHAT & HOW] dmub_rb_cmd's ramping_boundary has size of uint8_t and it is assigned 0xFFFF. Fix it by changing it to uint8_t with value of 0xFF.
This fixes 2 INTEGER_OVERFLOW issues reported by Coverity.(CVE-2024-47661)
| URL | Type | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"bpftool-5.10.0-233.0.0.132.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-5.10.0-233.0.0.132.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-5.10.0-233.0.0.132.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-233.0.0.132.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-233.0.0.132.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-233.0.0.132.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-233.0.0.132.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-233.0.0.132.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-233.0.0.132.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-233.0.0.132.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-233.0.0.132.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-233.0.0.132.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-233.0.0.132.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-233.0.0.132.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-233.0.0.132.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-5.10.0-233.0.0.132.oe2203sp4.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"bpftool-5.10.0-233.0.0.132.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-5.10.0-233.0.0.132.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-5.10.0-233.0.0.132.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-233.0.0.132.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-233.0.0.132.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-233.0.0.132.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-233.0.0.132.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-233.0.0.132.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-233.0.0.132.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-233.0.0.132.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-233.0.0.132.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-233.0.0.132.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-233.0.0.132.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-233.0.0.132.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-233.0.0.132.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP4",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.10.0-233.0.0.132.oe2203sp4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "Critical"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nocteontx2-af: Use separate handlers for interrupts\r\n\r\nFor PF to AF interrupt vector and VF to AF vector same\ninterrupt handler is registered which is causing race condition.\nWhen two interrupts are raised to two CPUs at same time\nthen two cores serve same event corrupting the data.(CVE-2024-27030)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmedia: go7007: fix a memleak in go7007_load_encoder\r\n\r\nIn go7007_load_encoder, bounce(i.e. go-\u0026gt;boot_fw), is allocated without\na deallocation thereafter. After the following call chain:\r\n\r\nsaa7134_go7007_init\n |-\u0026gt; go7007_boot_encoder\n |-\u0026gt; go7007_load_encoder\n |-\u0026gt; kfree(go)\r\n\r\ngo is freed and thus bounce is leaked.(CVE-2024-27074)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnetfilter: nf_tables: use timestamp to check for set element timeout\r\n\r\nAdd a timestamp field at the beginning of the transaction, store it\nin the nftables per-netns area.\r\n\r\nUpdate set backend .insert, .deactivate and sync gc path to use the\ntimestamp, this avoids that an element expires while control plane\ntransaction is still unfinished.\r\n\r\n.lookup and .update, which are used from packet path, still use the\ncurrent time to check if the element has expired. And .get path and dump\nalso since this runs lockless under rcu read size lock. Then, there is\nasync gc which also needs to check the current time since it runs\nasynchronously from a workqueue.(CVE-2024-27397)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ntee: optee: Fix kernel panic caused by incorrect error handling\r\n\r\nThe error path while failing to register devices on the TEE bus has a\nbug leading to kernel panic as follows:\r\n\r\n[ 15.398930] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffff07ed00626d7c\n[ 15.406913] Mem abort info:\n[ 15.409722] ESR = 0x0000000096000005\n[ 15.413490] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits\n[ 15.418814] SET = 0, FnV = 0\n[ 15.421878] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0\n[ 15.425031] FSC = 0x05: level 1 translation fault\n[ 15.429922] Data abort info:\n[ 15.432813] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000005, ISS2 = 0x00000000\n[ 15.438310] CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0\n[ 15.443372] GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0\n[ 15.448697] swapper pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=00000000d9e3e000\n[ 15.455413] [ffff07ed00626d7c] pgd=1800000bffdf9003, p4d=1800000bffdf9003, pud=0000000000000000\n[ 15.464146] Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000005 [#1] PREEMPT SMP\r\n\r\nCommit 7269cba53d90 (\u0026quot;tee: optee: Fix supplicant based device enumeration\u0026quot;)\nlead to the introduction of this bug. So fix it appropriately.(CVE-2024-35785)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/lima: fix a memleak in lima_heap_alloc\r\n\r\nWhen lima_vm_map_bo fails, the resources need to be deallocated, or\nthere will be memleaks.(CVE-2024-35829)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet/sched: taprio: extend minimum interval restriction to entire cycle too\r\n\r\nIt is possible for syzbot to side-step the restriction imposed by the\nblamed commit in the Fixes: tag, because the taprio UAPI permits a\ncycle-time different from (and potentially shorter than) the sum of\nentry intervals.\r\n\r\nWe need one more restriction, which is that the cycle time itself must\nbe larger than N * ETH_ZLEN bit times, where N is the number of schedule\nentries. This restriction needs to apply regardless of whether the cycle\ntime came from the user or was the implicit, auto-calculated value, so\nwe move the existing \u0026quot;cycle == 0\u0026quot; check outside the \u0026quot;if \u0026quot;(!new-\u0026gt;cycle_time)\u0026quot;\nbranch. This way covers both conditions and scenarios.\r\n\r\nAdd a selftest which illustrates the issue triggered by syzbot.(CVE-2024-36244)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nusb: gadget: f_fs: Fix race between aio_cancel() and AIO request complete\r\n\r\nFFS based applications can utilize the aio_cancel() callback to dequeue\npending USB requests submitted to the UDC. There is a scenario where the\nFFS application issues an AIO cancel call, while the UDC is handling a\nsoft disconnect. For a DWC3 based implementation, the callstack looks\nlike the following:\r\n\r\n DWC3 Gadget FFS Application\ndwc3_gadget_soft_disconnect() ...\n --\u0026gt; dwc3_stop_active_transfers()\n --\u0026gt; dwc3_gadget_giveback(-ESHUTDOWN)\n --\u0026gt; ffs_epfile_async_io_complete() ffs_aio_cancel()\n --\u0026gt; usb_ep_free_request() --\u0026gt; usb_ep_dequeue()\r\n\r\nThere is currently no locking implemented between the AIO completion\nhandler and AIO cancel, so the issue occurs if the completion routine is\nrunning in parallel to an AIO cancel call coming from the FFS application.\nAs the completion call frees the USB request (io_data-\u0026gt;req) the FFS\napplication is also referencing it for the usb_ep_dequeue() call. This can\nlead to accessing a stale/hanging pointer.\r\n\r\ncommit b566d38857fc (\u0026quot;usb: gadget: f_fs: use io_data-\u0026gt;status consistently\u0026quot;)\nrelocated the usb_ep_free_request() into ffs_epfile_async_io_complete().\nHowever, in order to properly implement locking to mitigate this issue, the\nspinlock can\u0026apos;t be added to ffs_epfile_async_io_complete(), as\nusb_ep_dequeue() (if successfully dequeuing a USB request) will call the\nfunction driver\u0026apos;s completion handler in the same context. Hence, leading\ninto a deadlock.\r\n\r\nFix this issue by moving the usb_ep_free_request() back to\nffs_user_copy_worker(), and ensuring that it explicitly sets io_data-\u0026gt;req\nto NULL after freeing it within the ffs-\u0026gt;eps_lock. This resolves the race\ncondition above, as the ffs_aio_cancel() routine will not continue\nattempting to dequeue a request that has already been freed, or the\nffs_user_copy_work() not freeing the USB request until the AIO cancel is\ndone referencing it.\r\n\r\nThis fix depends on\n commit b566d38857fc (\u0026quot;usb: gadget: f_fs: use io_data-\u0026gt;status\n consistently\u0026quot;)(CVE-2024-36894)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nipv4: Fix uninit-value access in __ip_make_skb()\r\n\r\nKMSAN reported uninit-value access in __ip_make_skb() [1]. __ip_make_skb()\ntests HDRINCL to know if the skb has icmphdr. However, HDRINCL can cause a\nrace condition. If calling setsockopt(2) with IP_HDRINCL changes HDRINCL\nwhile __ip_make_skb() is running, the function will access icmphdr in the\nskb even if it is not included. This causes the issue reported by KMSAN.\r\n\r\nCheck FLOWI_FLAG_KNOWN_NH on fl4-\u0026gt;flowi4_flags instead of testing HDRINCL\non the socket.\r\n\r\nAlso, fl4-\u0026gt;fl4_icmp_type and fl4-\u0026gt;fl4_icmp_code are not initialized. These\nare union in struct flowi4 and are implicitly initialized by\nflowi4_init_output(), but we should not rely on specific union layout.\r\n\r\nInitialize these explicitly in raw_sendmsg().\r\n\r\n[1]\nBUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in __ip_make_skb+0x2b74/0x2d20 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:1481\n __ip_make_skb+0x2b74/0x2d20 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:1481\n ip_finish_skb include/net/ip.h:243 [inline]\n ip_push_pending_frames+0x4c/0x5c0 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:1508\n raw_sendmsg+0x2381/0x2690 net/ipv4/raw.c:654\n inet_sendmsg+0x27b/0x2a0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:851\n sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]\n __sock_sendmsg+0x274/0x3c0 net/socket.c:745\n __sys_sendto+0x62c/0x7b0 net/socket.c:2191\n __do_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2203 [inline]\n __se_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2199 [inline]\n __x64_sys_sendto+0x130/0x200 net/socket.c:2199\n do_syscall_64+0xd8/0x1f0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75\r\n\r\nUninit was created at:\n slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3804 [inline]\n slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3845 [inline]\n kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x5f6/0xc50 mm/slub.c:3888\n kmalloc_reserve+0x13c/0x4a0 net/core/skbuff.c:577\n __alloc_skb+0x35a/0x7c0 net/core/skbuff.c:668\n alloc_skb include/linux/skbuff.h:1318 [inline]\n __ip_append_data+0x49ab/0x68c0 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:1128\n ip_append_data+0x1e7/0x260 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:1365\n raw_sendmsg+0x22b1/0x2690 net/ipv4/raw.c:648\n inet_sendmsg+0x27b/0x2a0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:851\n sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]\n __sock_sendmsg+0x274/0x3c0 net/socket.c:745\n __sys_sendto+0x62c/0x7b0 net/socket.c:2191\n __do_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2203 [inline]\n __se_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2199 [inline]\n __x64_sys_sendto+0x130/0x200 net/socket.c:2199\n do_syscall_64+0xd8/0x1f0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75\r\n\r\nCPU: 1 PID: 15709 Comm: syz-executor.7 Not tainted 6.8.0-11567-gb3603fcb79b1 #25\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-1.fc39 04/01/2014(CVE-2024-36927)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nwifi: nl80211: don\u0026apos;t free NULL coalescing rule\r\n\r\nIf the parsing fails, we can dereference a NULL pointer here.(CVE-2024-36941)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet/mlx5e: Fix netif state handling\r\n\r\nmlx5e_suspend cleans resources only if netif_device_present() returns\ntrue. However, mlx5e_resume changes the state of netif, via\nmlx5e_nic_enable, only if reg_state == NETREG_REGISTERED.\nIn the below case, the above leads to NULL-ptr Oops[1] and memory\nleaks:\r\n\r\nmlx5e_probe\n _mlx5e_resume\n mlx5e_attach_netdev\n mlx5e_nic_enable \u0026lt;-- netdev not reg, not calling netif_device_attach()\n register_netdev \u0026lt;-- failed for some reason.\nERROR_FLOW:\n _mlx5e_suspend \u0026lt;-- netif_device_present return false, resources aren\u0026apos;t freed :(\r\n\r\nHence, clean resources in this case as well.\r\n\r\n[1]\nBUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000\nPGD 0 P4D 0\nOops: 0010 [#1] SMP\nCPU: 2 PID: 9345 Comm: test-ovs-ct-gen Not tainted 6.5.0_for_upstream_min_debug_2023_09_05_16_01 #1\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014\nRIP: 0010:0x0\nCode: Unable to access opcode bytes at0xffffffffffffffd6.\nRSP: 0018:ffff888178aaf758 EFLAGS: 00010246\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n ? __die+0x20/0x60\n ? page_fault_oops+0x14c/0x3c0\n ? exc_page_fault+0x75/0x140\n ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30\n notifier_call_chain+0x35/0xb0\n blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x3d/0x60\n mlx5_blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x22/0x30 [mlx5_core]\n mlx5_core_uplink_netdev_event_replay+0x3e/0x60 [mlx5_core]\n mlx5_mdev_netdev_track+0x53/0x60 [mlx5_ib]\n mlx5_ib_roce_init+0xc3/0x340 [mlx5_ib]\n __mlx5_ib_add+0x34/0xd0 [mlx5_ib]\n mlx5r_probe+0xe1/0x210 [mlx5_ib]\n ? auxiliary_match_id+0x6a/0x90\n auxiliary_bus_probe+0x38/0x80\n ? driver_sysfs_add+0x51/0x80\n really_probe+0xc9/0x3e0\n ? driver_probe_device+0x90/0x90\n __driver_probe_device+0x80/0x160\n driver_probe_device+0x1e/0x90\n __device_attach_driver+0x7d/0x100\n bus_for_each_drv+0x80/0xd0\n __device_attach+0xbc/0x1f0\n bus_probe_device+0x86/0xa0\n device_add+0x637/0x840\n __auxiliary_device_add+0x3b/0xa0\n add_adev+0xc9/0x140 [mlx5_core]\n mlx5_rescan_drivers_locked+0x22a/0x310 [mlx5_core]\n mlx5_register_device+0x53/0xa0 [mlx5_core]\n mlx5_init_one_devl_locked+0x5c4/0x9c0 [mlx5_core]\n mlx5_init_one+0x3b/0x60 [mlx5_core]\n probe_one+0x44c/0x730 [mlx5_core]\n local_pci_probe+0x3e/0x90\n pci_device_probe+0xbf/0x210\n ? kernfs_create_link+0x5d/0xa0\n ? sysfs_do_create_link_sd+0x60/0xc0\n really_probe+0xc9/0x3e0\n ? driver_probe_device+0x90/0x90\n __driver_probe_device+0x80/0x160\n driver_probe_device+0x1e/0x90\n __device_attach_driver+0x7d/0x100\n bus_for_each_drv+0x80/0xd0\n __device_attach+0xbc/0x1f0\n pci_bus_add_device+0x54/0x80\n pci_iov_add_virtfn+0x2e6/0x320\n sriov_enable+0x208/0x420\n mlx5_core_sriov_configure+0x9e/0x200 [mlx5_core]\n sriov_numvfs_store+0xae/0x1a0\n kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x10c/0x1a0\n vfs_write+0x291/0x3c0\n ksys_write+0x5f/0xe0\n do_syscall_64+0x3d/0x90\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0\n CR2: 0000000000000000\n ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---(CVE-2024-38608)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nipv6: sr: fix invalid unregister error path\r\n\r\nThe error path of seg6_init() is wrong in case CONFIG_IPV6_SEG6_LWTUNNEL\nis not defined. In that case if seg6_hmac_init() fails, the\ngenl_unregister_family() isn\u0026apos;t called.\r\n\r\nThis issue exist since commit 46738b1317e1 (\u0026quot;ipv6: sr: add option to control\nlwtunnel support\u0026quot;), and commit 5559cea2d5aa (\u0026quot;ipv6: sr: fix possible\nuse-after-free and null-ptr-deref\u0026quot;) replaced unregister_pernet_subsys()\nwith genl_unregister_family() in this error path.(CVE-2024-38612)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ngreybus: Fix use-after-free bug in gb_interface_release due to race condition.\r\n\r\nIn gb_interface_create, \u0026amp;intf-\u0026gt;mode_switch_completion is bound with\ngb_interface_mode_switch_work. Then it will be started by\ngb_interface_request_mode_switch. Here is the relevant code.\nif (!queue_work(system_long_wq, \u0026amp;intf-\u0026gt;mode_switch_work)) {\n\t...\n}\r\n\r\nIf we call gb_interface_release to make cleanup, there may be an\nunfinished work. This function will call kfree to free the object\n\u0026quot;intf\u0026quot;. However, if gb_interface_mode_switch_work is scheduled to\nrun after kfree, it may cause use-after-free error as\ngb_interface_mode_switch_work will use the object \u0026quot;intf\u0026quot;.\nThe possible execution flow that may lead to the issue is as follows:\r\n\r\nCPU0 CPU1\r\n\r\n | gb_interface_create\n | gb_interface_request_mode_switch\ngb_interface_release |\nkfree(intf) (free) |\n | gb_interface_mode_switch_work\n | mutex_lock(\u0026amp;intf-\u0026gt;mutex) (use)\r\n\r\nFix it by canceling the work before kfree.(CVE-2024-39495)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnetns: Make get_net_ns() handle zero refcount net\r\n\r\nSyzkaller hit a warning:\nrefcount_t: addition on 0; use-after-free.\nWARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 7890 at lib/refcount.c:25 refcount_warn_saturate+0xdf/0x1d0\nModules linked in:\nCPU: 3 PID: 7890 Comm: tun Not tainted 6.10.0-rc3-00100-gcaa4f9578aba-dirty #310\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014\nRIP: 0010:refcount_warn_saturate+0xdf/0x1d0\nCode: 41 49 04 31 ff 89 de e8 9f 1e cd fe 84 db 75 9c e8 76 26 cd fe c6 05 b6 41 49 04 01 90 48 c7 c7 b8 8e 25 86 e8 d2 05 b5 fe 90 \u0026lt;0f\u0026gt; 0b 90 90 e9 79 ff ff ff e8 53 26 cd fe 0f b6 1\nRSP: 0018:ffff8881067b7da0 EFLAGS: 00010286\nRAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffffffff811c72ac\nRDX: ffff8881026a2140 RSI: ffffffff811c72b5 RDI: 0000000000000001\nRBP: ffff8881067b7db0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 205b5d3730353139\nR10: 0000000000000000 R11: 205d303938375420 R12: ffff8881086500c4\nR13: ffff8881086500c4 R14: ffff8881086500b0 R15: ffff888108650040\nFS: 00007f5b2961a4c0(0000) GS:ffff88823bd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: 000055d7ed36fd18 CR3: 00000001482f6000 CR4: 00000000000006f0\nDR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\nDR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n ? show_regs+0xa3/0xc0\n ? __warn+0xa5/0x1c0\n ? refcount_warn_saturate+0xdf/0x1d0\n ? report_bug+0x1fc/0x2d0\n ? refcount_warn_saturate+0xdf/0x1d0\n ? handle_bug+0xa1/0x110\n ? exc_invalid_op+0x3c/0xb0\n ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1f/0x30\n ? __warn_printk+0xcc/0x140\n ? __warn_printk+0xd5/0x140\n ? refcount_warn_saturate+0xdf/0x1d0\n get_net_ns+0xa4/0xc0\n ? __pfx_get_net_ns+0x10/0x10\n open_related_ns+0x5a/0x130\n __tun_chr_ioctl+0x1616/0x2370\n ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_switch+0x58/0xa0\n ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp2+0x1c/0x30\n ? __pfx_tun_chr_ioctl+0x10/0x10\n tun_chr_ioctl+0x2f/0x40\n __x64_sys_ioctl+0x11b/0x160\n x64_sys_call+0x1211/0x20d0\n do_syscall_64+0x9e/0x1d0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f\nRIP: 0033:0x7f5b28f165d7\nCode: b3 66 90 48 8b 05 b1 48 2d 00 64 c7 00 26 00 00 00 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 \u0026lt;48\u0026gt; 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 81 48 2d 00 8\nRSP: 002b:00007ffc2b59c5e8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010\nRAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f5b28f165d7\nRDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000000054e3 RDI: 0000000000000003\nRBP: 00007ffc2b59c650 R08: 00007f5b291ed8c0 R09: 00007f5b2961a4c0\nR10: 0000000029690010 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000400730\nR13: 00007ffc2b59cf40 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\nKernel panic - not syncing: kernel: panic_on_warn set ...\r\n\r\nThis is trigger as below:\n ns0 ns1\ntun_set_iff() //dev is tun0\n tun-\u0026gt;dev = dev\n//ip link set tun0 netns ns1\n put_net() //ref is 0\n__tun_chr_ioctl() //TUNGETDEVNETNS\n net = dev_net(tun-\u0026gt;dev);\n open_related_ns(\u0026amp;net-\u0026gt;ns, get_net_ns); //ns1\n get_net_ns()\n get_net() //addition on 0\r\n\r\nUse maybe_get_net() in get_net_ns in case net\u0026apos;s ref is zero to fix this(CVE-2024-40958)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nscsi: qla2xxx: During vport delete send async logout explicitly\r\n\r\nDuring vport delete, it is observed that during unload we hit a crash\nbecause of stale entries in outstanding command array. For all these stale\nI/O entries, eh_abort was issued and aborted (fast_fail_io = 2009h) but\nI/Os could not complete while vport delete is in process of deleting.\r\n\r\n BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 000000000000001c\n #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode\n #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page\n PGD 0 P4D 0\n Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI\n Workqueue: qla2xxx_wq qla_do_work [qla2xxx]\n RIP: 0010:dma_direct_unmap_sg+0x51/0x1e0\n RSP: 0018:ffffa1e1e150fc68 EFLAGS: 00010046\n RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000021 RCX: 0000000000000001\n RDX: 0000000000000021 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff8ce208a7a0d0\n RBP: ffff8ce208a7a0d0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff8ce378aac9c8\n R10: ffff8ce378aac8a0 R11: ffffa1e1e150f9d8 R12: 0000000000000000\n R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff8ce378aac9c8 R15: 0000000000000000\n FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8d217f000000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n CR2: 000000000000001c CR3: 0000002089acc000 CR4: 0000000000350ee0\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n qla2xxx_qpair_sp_free_dma+0x417/0x4e0\n ? qla2xxx_qpair_sp_compl+0x10d/0x1a0\n ? qla2x00_status_entry+0x768/0x2830\n ? newidle_balance+0x2f0/0x430\n ? dequeue_entity+0x100/0x3c0\n ? qla24xx_process_response_queue+0x6a1/0x19e0\n ? __schedule+0x2d5/0x1140\n ? qla_do_work+0x47/0x60\n ? process_one_work+0x267/0x440\n ? process_one_work+0x440/0x440\n ? worker_thread+0x2d/0x3d0\n ? process_one_work+0x440/0x440\n ? kthread+0x156/0x180\n ? set_kthread_struct+0x50/0x50\n ? ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\r\n\r\nSend out async logout explicitly for all the ports during vport delete.(CVE-2024-42289)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: flow_dissector: use DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE\r\n\r\nThe following splat is easy to reproduce upstream as well as in -stable\nkernels. Florian Westphal provided the following commit:\r\n\r\n d1dab4f71d37 (\u0026quot;net: add and use __skb_get_hash_symmetric_net\u0026quot;)\r\n\r\nbut this complementary fix has been also suggested by Willem de Bruijn\nand it can be easily backported to -stable kernel which consists in\nusing DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE instead to silence the following splat\ngiven __skb_get_hash() is used by the nftables tracing infrastructure to\nto identify packets in traces.\r\n\r\n[69133.561393] ------------[ cut here ]------------\n[69133.561404] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 43576 at net/core/flow_dissector.c:1104 __skb_flow_dissect+0x134f/\n[...]\n[69133.561944] CPU: 0 PID: 43576 Comm: socat Not tainted 6.10.0-rc7+ #379\n[69133.561959] RIP: 0010:__skb_flow_dissect+0x134f/0x2ad0\n[69133.561970] Code: 83 f9 04 0f 84 b3 00 00 00 45 85 c9 0f 84 aa 00 00 00 41 83 f9 02 0f 84 81 fc ff\nff 44 0f b7 b4 24 80 00 00 00 e9 8b f9 ff ff \u0026lt;0f\u0026gt; 0b e9 20 f3 ff ff 41 f6 c6 20 0f 84 e4 ef ff ff 48 8d 7b 12 e8\n[69133.561979] RSP: 0018:ffffc90000006fc0 EFLAGS: 00010246\n[69133.561988] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffff82f33e20 RCX: ffffffff81ab7e19\n[69133.561994] RDX: dffffc0000000000 RSI: ffffc90000007388 RDI: ffff888103a1b418\n[69133.562001] RBP: ffffc90000007310 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000\n[69133.562007] R10: ffffc90000007388 R11: ffffffff810cface R12: ffff888103a1b400\n[69133.562013] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffffffff82f33e2a R15: ffffffff82f33e28\n[69133.562020] FS: 00007f40f7131740(0000) GS:ffff888390800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n[69133.562027] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n[69133.562033] CR2: 00007f40f7346ee0 CR3: 000000015d200001 CR4: 00000000001706f0\n[69133.562040] Call Trace:\n[69133.562044] \u0026lt;IRQ\u0026gt;\n[69133.562049] ? __warn+0x9f/0x1a0\n[ 1211.841384] ? __skb_flow_dissect+0x107e/0x2860\n[...]\n[ 1211.841496] ? bpf_flow_dissect+0x160/0x160\n[ 1211.841753] __skb_get_hash+0x97/0x280\n[ 1211.841765] ? __skb_get_hash_symmetric+0x230/0x230\n[ 1211.841776] ? mod_find+0xbf/0xe0\n[ 1211.841786] ? get_stack_info_noinstr+0x12/0xe0\n[ 1211.841798] ? bpf_ksym_find+0x56/0xe0\n[ 1211.841807] ? __rcu_read_unlock+0x2a/0x70\n[ 1211.841819] nft_trace_init+0x1b9/0x1c0 [nf_tables]\n[ 1211.841895] ? nft_trace_notify+0x830/0x830 [nf_tables]\n[ 1211.841964] ? get_stack_info+0x2b/0x80\n[ 1211.841975] ? nft_do_chain_arp+0x80/0x80 [nf_tables]\n[ 1211.842044] nft_do_chain+0x79c/0x850 [nf_tables](CVE-2024-42321)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmlxsw: spectrum_acl_erp: Fix object nesting warning\r\n\r\nACLs in Spectrum-2 and newer ASICs can reside in the algorithmic TCAM\n(A-TCAM) or in the ordinary circuit TCAM (C-TCAM). The former can\ncontain more ACLs (i.e., tc filters), but the number of masks in each\nregion (i.e., tc chain) is limited.\r\n\r\nIn order to mitigate the effects of the above limitation, the device\nallows filters to share a single mask if their masks only differ in up\nto 8 consecutive bits. For example, dst_ip/25 can be represented using\ndst_ip/24 with a delta of 1 bit. The C-TCAM does not have a limit on the\nnumber of masks being used (and therefore does not support mask\naggregation), but can contain a limited number of filters.\r\n\r\nThe driver uses the \u0026quot;objagg\u0026quot; library to perform the mask aggregation by\npassing it objects that consist of the filter\u0026apos;s mask and whether the\nfilter is to be inserted into the A-TCAM or the C-TCAM since filters in\ndifferent TCAMs cannot share a mask.\r\n\r\nThe set of created objects is dependent on the insertion order of the\nfilters and is not necessarily optimal. Therefore, the driver will\nperiodically ask the library to compute a more optimal set (\u0026quot;hints\u0026quot;) by\nlooking at all the existing objects.\r\n\r\nWhen the library asks the driver whether two objects can be aggregated\nthe driver only compares the provided masks and ignores the A-TCAM /\nC-TCAM indication. This is the right thing to do since the goal is to\nmove as many filters as possible to the A-TCAM. The driver also forbids\ntwo identical masks from being aggregated since this can only happen if\none was intentionally put in the C-TCAM to avoid a conflict in the\nA-TCAM.\r\n\r\nThe above can result in the following set of hints:\r\n\r\nH1: {mask X, A-TCAM} -\u0026gt; H2: {mask Y, A-TCAM} // X is Y + delta\nH3: {mask Y, C-TCAM} -\u0026gt; H4: {mask Z, A-TCAM} // Y is Z + delta\r\n\r\nAfter getting the hints from the library the driver will start migrating\nfilters from one region to another while consulting the computed hints\nand instructing the device to perform a lookup in both regions during\nthe transition.\r\n\r\nAssuming a filter with mask X is being migrated into the A-TCAM in the\nnew region, the hints lookup will return H1. Since H2 is the parent of\nH1, the library will try to find the object associated with it and\ncreate it if necessary in which case another hints lookup (recursive)\nwill be performed. This hints lookup for {mask Y, A-TCAM} will either\nreturn H2 or H3 since the driver passes the library an object comparison\nfunction that ignores the A-TCAM / C-TCAM indication.\r\n\r\nThis can eventually lead to nested objects which are not supported by\nthe library [1].\r\n\r\nFix by removing the object comparison function from both the driver and\nthe library as the driver was the only user. That way the lookup will\nonly return exact matches.\r\n\r\nI do not have a reliable reproducer that can reproduce the issue in a\ntimely manner, but before the fix the issue would reproduce in several\nminutes and with the fix it does not reproduce in over an hour.\r\n\r\nNote that the current usefulness of the hints is limited because they\ninclude the C-TCAM indication and represent aggregation that cannot\nactually happen. This will be addressed in net-next.\r\n\r\n[1]\nWARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 153 at lib/objagg.c:170 objagg_obj_parent_assign+0xb5/0xd0\nModules linked in:\nCPU: 0 PID: 153 Comm: kworker/0:18 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc6-custom-g70fbc2c1c38b #42\nHardware name: Mellanox Technologies Ltd. MSN3700C/VMOD0008, BIOS 5.11 10/10/2018\nWorkqueue: mlxsw_core mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work\nRIP: 0010:objagg_obj_parent_assign+0xb5/0xd0\n[...]\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n __objagg_obj_get+0x2bb/0x580\n objagg_obj_get+0xe/0x80\n mlxsw_sp_acl_erp_mask_get+0xb5/0xf0\n mlxsw_sp_acl_atcam_entry_add+0xe8/0x3c0\n mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_entry_create+0x5e/0xa0\n mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vchunk_migrate_one+0x16b/0x270\n mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work+0xbe/0x510\n process_one_work+0x151/0x370(CVE-2024-43880)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ngpio: prevent potential speculation leaks in gpio_device_get_desc()\r\n\r\nUserspace may trigger a speculative read of an address outside the gpio\ndescriptor array.\nUsers can do that by calling gpio_ioctl() with an offset out of range.\nOffset is copied from user and then used as an array index to get\nthe gpio descriptor without sanitization in gpio_device_get_desc().\r\n\r\nThis change ensures that the offset is sanitized by using\narray_index_nospec() to mitigate any possibility of speculative\ninformation leaks.\r\n\r\nThis bug was discovered and resolved using Coverity Static Analysis\nSecurity Testing (SAST) by Synopsys, Inc.(CVE-2024-44931)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndriver core: Fix uevent_show() vs driver detach race\r\n\r\nuevent_show() wants to de-reference dev-\u0026gt;driver-\u0026gt;name. There is no clean\nway for a device attribute to de-reference dev-\u0026gt;driver unless that\nattribute is defined via (struct device_driver).dev_groups. Instead, the\nanti-pattern of taking the device_lock() in the attribute handler risks\ndeadlocks with code paths that remove device attributes while holding\nthe lock.\r\n\r\nThis deadlock is typically invisible to lockdep given the device_lock()\nis marked lockdep_set_novalidate_class(), but some subsystems allocate a\nlocal lockdep key for @dev-\u0026gt;mutex to reveal reports of the form:\r\n\r\n ======================================================\n WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected\n 6.10.0-rc7+ #275 Tainted: G OE N\n ------------------------------------------------------\n modprobe/2374 is trying to acquire lock:\n ffff8c2270070de0 (kn-\u0026gt;active#6){++++}-{0:0}, at: __kernfs_remove+0xde/0x220\r\n\r\n but task is already holding lock:\n ffff8c22016e88f8 (\u0026amp;cxl_root_key){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x39/0x210\r\n\r\n which lock already depends on the new lock.\r\n\r\n the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:\r\n\r\n -\u0026gt; #1 (\u0026amp;cxl_root_key){+.+.}-{3:3}:\n __mutex_lock+0x99/0xc30\n uevent_show+0xac/0x130\n dev_attr_show+0x18/0x40\n sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xac/0xf0\n seq_read_iter+0x110/0x450\n vfs_read+0x25b/0x340\n ksys_read+0x67/0xf0\n do_syscall_64+0x75/0x190\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e\r\n\r\n -\u0026gt; #0 (kn-\u0026gt;active#6){++++}-{0:0}:\n __lock_acquire+0x121a/0x1fa0\n lock_acquire+0xd6/0x2e0\n kernfs_drain+0x1e9/0x200\n __kernfs_remove+0xde/0x220\n kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x5e/0xa0\n device_del+0x168/0x410\n device_unregister+0x13/0x60\n devres_release_all+0xb8/0x110\n device_unbind_cleanup+0xe/0x70\n device_release_driver_internal+0x1c7/0x210\n driver_detach+0x47/0x90\n bus_remove_driver+0x6c/0xf0\n cxl_acpi_exit+0xc/0x11 [cxl_acpi]\n __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x181/0x260\n do_syscall_64+0x75/0x190\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e\r\n\r\nThe observation though is that driver objects are typically much longer\nlived than device objects. It is reasonable to perform lockless\nde-reference of a @driver pointer even if it is racing detach from a\ndevice. Given the infrequency of driver unregistration, use\nsynchronize_rcu() in module_remove_driver() to close any potential\nraces. It is potentially overkill to suffer synchronize_rcu() just to\nhandle the rare module removal racing uevent_show() event.\r\n\r\nThanks to Tetsuo Handa for the debug analysis of the syzbot report [1].(CVE-2024-44952)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbonding: fix xfrm real_dev null pointer dereference\r\n\r\nWe shouldn\u0026apos;t set real_dev to NULL because packets can be in transit and\nxfrm might call xdo_dev_offload_ok() in parallel. All callbacks assume\nreal_dev is set.\r\n\r\n Example trace:\n kernel: BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 0000000000001030\n kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): making interface the new active one\n kernel: #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode\n kernel: #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page\n kernel: PGD 0 P4D 0\n kernel: Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT SMP\n kernel: CPU: 4 PID: 2237 Comm: ping Not tainted 6.7.7+ #12\n kernel: Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-2.fc40 04/01/2014\n kernel: RIP: 0010:nsim_ipsec_offload_ok+0xc/0x20 [netdevsim]\n kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): bond_ipsec_add_sa_all: failed to add SA\n kernel: Code: e0 0f 0b 48 83 7f 38 00 74 de 0f 0b 48 8b 47 08 48 8b 37 48 8b 78 40 e9 b2 e5 9a d7 66 90 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 8b 86 80 02 00 00 \u0026lt;83\u0026gt; 80 30 10 00 00 01 b8 01 00 00 00 c3 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 0f 1f\n kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): making interface the new active one\n kernel: RSP: 0018:ffffabde81553b98 EFLAGS: 00010246\n kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): bond_ipsec_add_sa_all: failed to add SA\n kernel:\n kernel: RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff9eb404e74900 RCX: ffff9eb403d97c60\n kernel: RDX: ffffffffc090de10 RSI: ffff9eb404e74900 RDI: ffff9eb3c5de9e00\n kernel: RBP: ffff9eb3c0a42000 R08: 0000000000000010 R09: 0000000000000014\n kernel: R10: 7974203030303030 R11: 3030303030303030 R12: 0000000000000000\n kernel: R13: ffff9eb3c5de9e00 R14: ffffabde81553cc8 R15: ffff9eb404c53000\n kernel: FS: 00007f2a77a3ad00(0000) GS:ffff9eb43bd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n kernel: CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n kernel: CR2: 0000000000001030 CR3: 00000001122ab000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0\n kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): making interface the new active one\n kernel: Call Trace:\n kernel: \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n kernel: ? __die+0x1f/0x60\n kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): bond_ipsec_add_sa_all: failed to add SA\n kernel: ? page_fault_oops+0x142/0x4c0\n kernel: ? do_user_addr_fault+0x65/0x670\n kernel: ? kvm_read_and_reset_apf_flags+0x3b/0x50\n kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): making interface the new active one\n kernel: ? exc_page_fault+0x7b/0x180\n kernel: ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30\n kernel: ? nsim_bpf_uninit+0x50/0x50 [netdevsim]\n kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): bond_ipsec_add_sa_all: failed to add SA\n kernel: ? nsim_ipsec_offload_ok+0xc/0x20 [netdevsim]\n kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): making interface the new active one\n kernel: bond_ipsec_offload_ok+0x7b/0x90 [bonding]\n kernel: xfrm_output+0x61/0x3b0\n kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): bond_ipsec_add_sa_all: failed to add SA\n kernel: ip_push_pending_frames+0x56/0x80(CVE-2024-44989)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbonding: fix null pointer deref in bond_ipsec_offload_ok\r\n\r\nWe must check if there is an active slave before dereferencing the pointer.(CVE-2024-44990)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndmaengine: altera-msgdma: properly free descriptor in msgdma_free_descriptor\r\n\r\nRemove list_del call in msgdma_chan_desc_cleanup, this should be the role\nof msgdma_free_descriptor. In consequence replace list_add_tail with\nlist_move_tail in msgdma_free_descriptor.\r\n\r\nThis fixes the path:\n msgdma_free_chan_resources -\u0026gt; msgdma_free_descriptors -\u0026gt;\n msgdma_free_desc_list -\u0026gt; msgdma_free_descriptor\r\n\r\nwhich does not correctly free the descriptors as first nodes were not\nremoved from the list.(CVE-2024-46716)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amd/display: Stop amdgpu_dm initialize when stream nums greater than 6\r\n\r\n[Why]\nCoverity reports OVERRUN warning. Should abort amdgpu_dm\ninitialize.\r\n\r\n[How]\nReturn failure to amdgpu_dm_init.(CVE-2024-46817)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\narm64: acpi: Harden get_cpu_for_acpi_id() against missing CPU entry\r\n\r\nIn a review discussion of the changes to support vCPU hotplug where\na check was added on the GICC being enabled if was online, it was\nnoted that there is need to map back to the cpu and use that to index\ninto a cpumask. As such, a valid ID is needed.\r\n\r\nIf an MPIDR check fails in acpi_map_gic_cpu_interface() it is possible\nfor the entry in cpu_madt_gicc[cpu] == NULL. This function would\nthen cause a NULL pointer dereference. Whilst a path to trigger\nthis has not been established, harden this caller against the\npossibility.(CVE-2024-46822)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nplatform/x86: panasonic-laptop: Fix SINF array out of bounds accesses\r\n\r\nThe panasonic laptop code in various places uses the SINF array with index\nvalues of 0 - SINF_CUR_BRIGHT(0x0d) without checking that the SINF array\nis big enough.\r\n\r\nNot all panasonic laptops have this many SINF array entries, for example\nthe Toughbook CF-18 model only has 10 SINF array entries. So it only\nsupports the AC+DC brightness entries and mute.\r\n\r\nCheck that the SINF array has a minimum size which covers all AC+DC\nbrightness entries and refuse to load if the SINF array is smaller.\r\n\r\nFor higher SINF indexes hide the sysfs attributes when the SINF array\ndoes not contain an entry for that attribute, avoiding show()/store()\naccessing the array out of bounds and add bounds checking to the probe()\nand resume() code accessing these.(CVE-2024-46859)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amd/display: Avoid overflow from uint32_t to uint8_t\r\n\r\n[WHAT \u0026amp; HOW]\ndmub_rb_cmd\u0026apos;s ramping_boundary has size of uint8_t and it is assigned\n0xFFFF. Fix it by changing it to uint8_t with value of 0xFF.\r\n\r\nThis fixes 2 INTEGER_OVERFLOW issues reported by Coverity.(CVE-2024-47661)",
"id": "OESA-2024-2292",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:07:46Z",
"published": "2024-10-25T11:07:46Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2024-2292"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27030"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27074"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27397"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35785"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35829"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36244"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36894"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36927"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36941"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38608"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38612"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39495"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40958"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42289"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42321"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43880"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-44931"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-44952"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-44989"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-44990"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46716"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46817"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46822"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46859"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47661"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2024-27030",
"CVE-2024-27074",
"CVE-2024-27397",
"CVE-2024-35785",
"CVE-2024-35829",
"CVE-2024-36244",
"CVE-2024-36894",
"CVE-2024-36927",
"CVE-2024-36941",
"CVE-2024-38608",
"CVE-2024-38612",
"CVE-2024-39495",
"CVE-2024-40958",
"CVE-2024-42289",
"CVE-2024-42321",
"CVE-2024-43880",
"CVE-2024-44931",
"CVE-2024-44952",
"CVE-2024-44989",
"CVE-2024-44990",
"CVE-2024-46716",
"CVE-2024-46817",
"CVE-2024-46822",
"CVE-2024-46859",
"CVE-2024-47661"
]
}
OESA-2024-2293 (CVE-2024-27030)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2024-10-25 11:07 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:07 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
octeontx2-af: Use separate handlers for interrupts
For PF to AF interrupt vector and VF to AF vector same interrupt handler is registered which is causing race condition. When two interrupts are raised to two CPUs at same time then two cores serve same event corrupting the data.(CVE-2024-27030)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
media: go7007: fix a memleak in go7007_load_encoder
In go7007_load_encoder, bounce(i.e. go->boot_fw), is allocated without a deallocation thereafter. After the following call chain:
saa7134_go7007_init |-> go7007_boot_encoder |-> go7007_load_encoder |-> kfree(go)
go is freed and thus bounce is leaked.(CVE-2024-27074)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: nf_tables: use timestamp to check for set element timeout
Add a timestamp field at the beginning of the transaction, store it in the nftables per-netns area.
Update set backend .insert, .deactivate and sync gc path to use the timestamp, this avoids that an element expires while control plane transaction is still unfinished.
.lookup and .update, which are used from packet path, still use the current time to check if the element has expired. And .get path and dump also since this runs lockless under rcu read size lock. Then, there is async gc which also needs to check the current time since it runs asynchronously from a workqueue.(CVE-2024-27397)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tee: optee: Fix kernel panic caused by incorrect error handling
The error path while failing to register devices on the TEE bus has a bug leading to kernel panic as follows:
[ 15.398930] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffff07ed00626d7c [ 15.406913] Mem abort info: [ 15.409722] ESR = 0x0000000096000005 [ 15.413490] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits [ 15.418814] SET = 0, FnV = 0 [ 15.421878] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 [ 15.425031] FSC = 0x05: level 1 translation fault [ 15.429922] Data abort info: [ 15.432813] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000005, ISS2 = 0x00000000 [ 15.438310] CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0 [ 15.443372] GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0 [ 15.448697] swapper pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=00000000d9e3e000 [ 15.455413] [ffff07ed00626d7c] pgd=1800000bffdf9003, p4d=1800000bffdf9003, pud=0000000000000000 [ 15.464146] Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000005 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
Commit 7269cba53d90 ("tee: optee: Fix supplicant based device enumeration") lead to the introduction of this bug. So fix it appropriately.(CVE-2024-35785)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/lima: fix a memleak in lima_heap_alloc
When lima_vm_map_bo fails, the resources need to be deallocated, or there will be memleaks.(CVE-2024-35829)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/sched: taprio: extend minimum interval restriction to entire cycle too
It is possible for syzbot to side-step the restriction imposed by the blamed commit in the Fixes: tag, because the taprio UAPI permits a cycle-time different from (and potentially shorter than) the sum of entry intervals.
We need one more restriction, which is that the cycle time itself must be larger than N * ETH_ZLEN bit times, where N is the number of schedule entries. This restriction needs to apply regardless of whether the cycle time came from the user or was the implicit, auto-calculated value, so we move the existing "cycle == 0" check outside the "if "(!new->cycle_time)" branch. This way covers both conditions and scenarios.
Add a selftest which illustrates the issue triggered by syzbot.(CVE-2024-36244)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipv4: Fix uninit-value access in __ip_make_skb()
KMSAN reported uninit-value access in __ip_make_skb() [1]. __ip_make_skb() tests HDRINCL to know if the skb has icmphdr. However, HDRINCL can cause a race condition. If calling setsockopt(2) with IP_HDRINCL changes HDRINCL while __ip_make_skb() is running, the function will access icmphdr in the skb even if it is not included. This causes the issue reported by KMSAN.
Check FLOWI_FLAG_KNOWN_NH on fl4->flowi4_flags instead of testing HDRINCL on the socket.
Also, fl4->fl4_icmp_type and fl4->fl4_icmp_code are not initialized. These are union in struct flowi4 and are implicitly initialized by flowi4_init_output(), but we should not rely on specific union layout.
Initialize these explicitly in raw_sendmsg().
[1] BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in __ip_make_skb+0x2b74/0x2d20 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:1481 __ip_make_skb+0x2b74/0x2d20 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:1481 ip_finish_skb include/net/ip.h:243 [inline] ip_push_pending_frames+0x4c/0x5c0 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:1508 raw_sendmsg+0x2381/0x2690 net/ipv4/raw.c:654 inet_sendmsg+0x27b/0x2a0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:851 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline] __sock_sendmsg+0x274/0x3c0 net/socket.c:745 __sys_sendto+0x62c/0x7b0 net/socket.c:2191 __do_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2203 [inline] __se_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2199 [inline] __x64_sys_sendto+0x130/0x200 net/socket.c:2199 do_syscall_64+0xd8/0x1f0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75
Uninit was created at: slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3804 [inline] slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3845 [inline] kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x5f6/0xc50 mm/slub.c:3888 kmalloc_reserve+0x13c/0x4a0 net/core/skbuff.c:577 __alloc_skb+0x35a/0x7c0 net/core/skbuff.c:668 alloc_skb include/linux/skbuff.h:1318 [inline] __ip_append_data+0x49ab/0x68c0 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:1128 ip_append_data+0x1e7/0x260 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:1365 raw_sendmsg+0x22b1/0x2690 net/ipv4/raw.c:648 inet_sendmsg+0x27b/0x2a0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:851 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline] __sock_sendmsg+0x274/0x3c0 net/socket.c:745 __sys_sendto+0x62c/0x7b0 net/socket.c:2191 __do_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2203 [inline] __se_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2199 [inline] __x64_sys_sendto+0x130/0x200 net/socket.c:2199 do_syscall_64+0xd8/0x1f0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75
CPU: 1 PID: 15709 Comm: syz-executor.7 Not tainted 6.8.0-11567-gb3603fcb79b1 #25 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-1.fc39 04/01/2014(CVE-2024-36927)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/mlx5e: Fix netif state handling
mlx5e_suspend cleans resources only if netif_device_present() returns true. However, mlx5e_resume changes the state of netif, via mlx5e_nic_enable, only if reg_state == NETREG_REGISTERED. In the below case, the above leads to NULL-ptr Oops[1] and memory leaks:
mlx5e_probe _mlx5e_resume mlx5e_attach_netdev mlx5e_nic_enable <-- netdev not reg, not calling netif_device_attach() register_netdev <-- failed for some reason. ERROR_FLOW: _mlx5e_suspend <-- netif_device_present return false, resources aren't freed :(
Hence, clean resources in this case as well.
[1] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000 PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0010 [#1] SMP CPU: 2 PID: 9345 Comm: test-ovs-ct-gen Not tainted 6.5.0_for_upstream_min_debug_2023_09_05_16_01 #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:0x0 Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at0xffffffffffffffd6. RSP: 0018:ffff888178aaf758 EFLAGS: 00010246 Call Trace: <TASK> ? __die+0x20/0x60 ? page_fault_oops+0x14c/0x3c0 ? exc_page_fault+0x75/0x140 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30 notifier_call_chain+0x35/0xb0 blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x3d/0x60 mlx5_blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x22/0x30 [mlx5_core] mlx5_core_uplink_netdev_event_replay+0x3e/0x60 [mlx5_core] mlx5_mdev_netdev_track+0x53/0x60 [mlx5_ib] mlx5_ib_roce_init+0xc3/0x340 [mlx5_ib] __mlx5_ib_add+0x34/0xd0 [mlx5_ib] mlx5r_probe+0xe1/0x210 [mlx5_ib] ? auxiliary_match_id+0x6a/0x90 auxiliary_bus_probe+0x38/0x80 ? driver_sysfs_add+0x51/0x80 really_probe+0xc9/0x3e0 ? driver_probe_device+0x90/0x90 __driver_probe_device+0x80/0x160 driver_probe_device+0x1e/0x90 __device_attach_driver+0x7d/0x100 bus_for_each_drv+0x80/0xd0 __device_attach+0xbc/0x1f0 bus_probe_device+0x86/0xa0 device_add+0x637/0x840 __auxiliary_device_add+0x3b/0xa0 add_adev+0xc9/0x140 [mlx5_core] mlx5_rescan_drivers_locked+0x22a/0x310 [mlx5_core] mlx5_register_device+0x53/0xa0 [mlx5_core] mlx5_init_one_devl_locked+0x5c4/0x9c0 [mlx5_core] mlx5_init_one+0x3b/0x60 [mlx5_core] probe_one+0x44c/0x730 [mlx5_core] local_pci_probe+0x3e/0x90 pci_device_probe+0xbf/0x210 ? kernfs_create_link+0x5d/0xa0 ? sysfs_do_create_link_sd+0x60/0xc0 really_probe+0xc9/0x3e0 ? driver_probe_device+0x90/0x90 __driver_probe_device+0x80/0x160 driver_probe_device+0x1e/0x90 __device_attach_driver+0x7d/0x100 bus_for_each_drv+0x80/0xd0 __device_attach+0xbc/0x1f0 pci_bus_add_device+0x54/0x80 pci_iov_add_virtfn+0x2e6/0x320 sriov_enable+0x208/0x420 mlx5_core_sriov_configure+0x9e/0x200 [mlx5_core] sriov_numvfs_store+0xae/0x1a0 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x10c/0x1a0 vfs_write+0x291/0x3c0 ksys_write+0x5f/0xe0 do_syscall_64+0x3d/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0 CR2: 0000000000000000 ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---(CVE-2024-38608)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipv6: sr: fix invalid unregister error path
The error path of seg6_init() is wrong in case CONFIG_IPV6_SEG6_LWTUNNEL is not defined. In that case if seg6_hmac_init() fails, the genl_unregister_family() isn't called.
This issue exist since commit 46738b1317e1 ("ipv6: sr: add option to control lwtunnel support"), and commit 5559cea2d5aa ("ipv6: sr: fix possible use-after-free and null-ptr-deref") replaced unregister_pernet_subsys() with genl_unregister_family() in this error path.(CVE-2024-38612)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
greybus: Fix use-after-free bug in gb_interface_release due to race condition.
In gb_interface_create, &intf->mode_switch_completion is bound with gb_interface_mode_switch_work. Then it will be started by gb_interface_request_mode_switch. Here is the relevant code. if (!queue_work(system_long_wq, &intf->mode_switch_work)) { ... }
If we call gb_interface_release to make cleanup, there may be an unfinished work. This function will call kfree to free the object "intf". However, if gb_interface_mode_switch_work is scheduled to run after kfree, it may cause use-after-free error as gb_interface_mode_switch_work will use the object "intf". The possible execution flow that may lead to the issue is as follows:
CPU0 CPU1
| gb_interface_create
| gb_interface_request_mode_switch
gb_interface_release | kfree(intf) (free) | | gb_interface_mode_switch_work | mutex_lock(&intf->mutex) (use)
Fix it by canceling the work before kfree.(CVE-2024-39495)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netns: Make get_net_ns() handle zero refcount net
Syzkaller hit a warning: refcount_t: addition on 0; use-after-free. WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 7890 at lib/refcount.c:25 refcount_warn_saturate+0xdf/0x1d0 Modules linked in: CPU: 3 PID: 7890 Comm: tun Not tainted 6.10.0-rc3-00100-gcaa4f9578aba-dirty #310 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:refcount_warn_saturate+0xdf/0x1d0 Code: 41 49 04 31 ff 89 de e8 9f 1e cd fe 84 db 75 9c e8 76 26 cd fe c6 05 b6 41 49 04 01 90 48 c7 c7 b8 8e 25 86 e8 d2 05 b5 fe 90 <0f> 0b 90 90 e9 79 ff ff ff e8 53 26 cd fe 0f b6 1 RSP: 0018:ffff8881067b7da0 EFLAGS: 00010286 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffffffff811c72ac RDX: ffff8881026a2140 RSI: ffffffff811c72b5 RDI: 0000000000000001 RBP: ffff8881067b7db0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 205b5d3730353139 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 205d303938375420 R12: ffff8881086500c4 R13: ffff8881086500c4 R14: ffff8881086500b0 R15: ffff888108650040 FS: 00007f5b2961a4c0(0000) GS:ffff88823bd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 000055d7ed36fd18 CR3: 00000001482f6000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> ? show_regs+0xa3/0xc0 ? __warn+0xa5/0x1c0 ? refcount_warn_saturate+0xdf/0x1d0 ? report_bug+0x1fc/0x2d0 ? refcount_warn_saturate+0xdf/0x1d0 ? handle_bug+0xa1/0x110 ? exc_invalid_op+0x3c/0xb0 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1f/0x30 ? __warn_printk+0xcc/0x140 ? __warn_printk+0xd5/0x140 ? refcount_warn_saturate+0xdf/0x1d0 get_net_ns+0xa4/0xc0 ? __pfx_get_net_ns+0x10/0x10 open_related_ns+0x5a/0x130 __tun_chr_ioctl+0x1616/0x2370 ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_switch+0x58/0xa0 ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp2+0x1c/0x30 ? __pfx_tun_chr_ioctl+0x10/0x10 tun_chr_ioctl+0x2f/0x40 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x11b/0x160 x64_sys_call+0x1211/0x20d0 do_syscall_64+0x9e/0x1d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7f5b28f165d7 Code: b3 66 90 48 8b 05 b1 48 2d 00 64 c7 00 26 00 00 00 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 81 48 2d 00 8 RSP: 002b:00007ffc2b59c5e8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f5b28f165d7 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000000054e3 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00007ffc2b59c650 R08: 00007f5b291ed8c0 R09: 00007f5b2961a4c0 R10: 0000000029690010 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000400730 R13: 00007ffc2b59cf40 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 </TASK> Kernel panic - not syncing: kernel: panic_on_warn set ...
This is trigger as below: ns0 ns1 tun_set_iff() //dev is tun0 tun->dev = dev //ip link set tun0 netns ns1 put_net() //ref is 0 __tun_chr_ioctl() //TUNGETDEVNETNS net = dev_net(tun->dev); open_related_ns(&net->ns, get_net_ns); //ns1 get_net_ns() get_net() //addition on 0
Use maybe_get_net() in get_net_ns in case net's ref is zero to fix this(CVE-2024-40958)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: qla2xxx: During vport delete send async logout explicitly
During vport delete, it is observed that during unload we hit a crash because of stale entries in outstanding command array. For all these stale I/O entries, eh_abort was issued and aborted (fast_fail_io = 2009h) but I/Os could not complete while vport delete is in process of deleting.
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 000000000000001c #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI Workqueue: qla2xxx_wq qla_do_work [qla2xxx] RIP: 0010:dma_direct_unmap_sg+0x51/0x1e0 RSP: 0018:ffffa1e1e150fc68 EFLAGS: 00010046 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000021 RCX: 0000000000000001 RDX: 0000000000000021 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff8ce208a7a0d0 RBP: ffff8ce208a7a0d0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff8ce378aac9c8 R10: ffff8ce378aac8a0 R11: ffffa1e1e150f9d8 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff8ce378aac9c8 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8d217f000000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 000000000000001c CR3: 0000002089acc000 CR4: 0000000000350ee0 Call Trace: <TASK> qla2xxx_qpair_sp_free_dma+0x417/0x4e0 ? qla2xxx_qpair_sp_compl+0x10d/0x1a0 ? qla2x00_status_entry+0x768/0x2830 ? newidle_balance+0x2f0/0x430 ? dequeue_entity+0x100/0x3c0 ? qla24xx_process_response_queue+0x6a1/0x19e0 ? __schedule+0x2d5/0x1140 ? qla_do_work+0x47/0x60 ? process_one_work+0x267/0x440 ? process_one_work+0x440/0x440 ? worker_thread+0x2d/0x3d0 ? process_one_work+0x440/0x440 ? kthread+0x156/0x180 ? set_kthread_struct+0x50/0x50 ? ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 </TASK>
Send out async logout explicitly for all the ports during vport delete.(CVE-2024-42289)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: flow_dissector: use DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE
The following splat is easy to reproduce upstream as well as in -stable kernels. Florian Westphal provided the following commit:
d1dab4f71d37 ("net: add and use __skb_get_hash_symmetric_net")
but this complementary fix has been also suggested by Willem de Bruijn and it can be easily backported to -stable kernel which consists in using DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE instead to silence the following splat given __skb_get_hash() is used by the nftables tracing infrastructure to to identify packets in traces.
[69133.561393] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [69133.561404] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 43576 at net/core/flow_dissector.c:1104 __skb_flow_dissect+0x134f/ [...] [69133.561944] CPU: 0 PID: 43576 Comm: socat Not tainted 6.10.0-rc7+ #379 [69133.561959] RIP: 0010:__skb_flow_dissect+0x134f/0x2ad0 [69133.561970] Code: 83 f9 04 0f 84 b3 00 00 00 45 85 c9 0f 84 aa 00 00 00 41 83 f9 02 0f 84 81 fc ff ff 44 0f b7 b4 24 80 00 00 00 e9 8b f9 ff ff <0f> 0b e9 20 f3 ff ff 41 f6 c6 20 0f 84 e4 ef ff ff 48 8d 7b 12 e8 [69133.561979] RSP: 0018:ffffc90000006fc0 EFLAGS: 00010246 [69133.561988] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffff82f33e20 RCX: ffffffff81ab7e19 [69133.561994] RDX: dffffc0000000000 RSI: ffffc90000007388 RDI: ffff888103a1b418 [69133.562001] RBP: ffffc90000007310 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [69133.562007] R10: ffffc90000007388 R11: ffffffff810cface R12: ffff888103a1b400 [69133.562013] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffffffff82f33e2a R15: ffffffff82f33e28 [69133.562020] FS: 00007f40f7131740(0000) GS:ffff888390800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [69133.562027] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [69133.562033] CR2: 00007f40f7346ee0 CR3: 000000015d200001 CR4: 00000000001706f0 [69133.562040] Call Trace: [69133.562044] <IRQ> [69133.562049] ? __warn+0x9f/0x1a0 [ 1211.841384] ? __skb_flow_dissect+0x107e/0x2860 [...] [ 1211.841496] ? bpf_flow_dissect+0x160/0x160 [ 1211.841753] __skb_get_hash+0x97/0x280 [ 1211.841765] ? __skb_get_hash_symmetric+0x230/0x230 [ 1211.841776] ? mod_find+0xbf/0xe0 [ 1211.841786] ? get_stack_info_noinstr+0x12/0xe0 [ 1211.841798] ? bpf_ksym_find+0x56/0xe0 [ 1211.841807] ? __rcu_read_unlock+0x2a/0x70 [ 1211.841819] nft_trace_init+0x1b9/0x1c0 [nf_tables] [ 1211.841895] ? nft_trace_notify+0x830/0x830 [nf_tables] [ 1211.841964] ? get_stack_info+0x2b/0x80 [ 1211.841975] ? nft_do_chain_arp+0x80/0x80 [nf_tables] [ 1211.842044] nft_do_chain+0x79c/0x850 nf_tables
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mlxsw: spectrum_acl_erp: Fix object nesting warning
ACLs in Spectrum-2 and newer ASICs can reside in the algorithmic TCAM (A-TCAM) or in the ordinary circuit TCAM (C-TCAM). The former can contain more ACLs (i.e., tc filters), but the number of masks in each region (i.e., tc chain) is limited.
In order to mitigate the effects of the above limitation, the device allows filters to share a single mask if their masks only differ in up to 8 consecutive bits. For example, dst_ip/25 can be represented using dst_ip/24 with a delta of 1 bit. The C-TCAM does not have a limit on the number of masks being used (and therefore does not support mask aggregation), but can contain a limited number of filters.
The driver uses the "objagg" library to perform the mask aggregation by passing it objects that consist of the filter's mask and whether the filter is to be inserted into the A-TCAM or the C-TCAM since filters in different TCAMs cannot share a mask.
The set of created objects is dependent on the insertion order of the filters and is not necessarily optimal. Therefore, the driver will periodically ask the library to compute a more optimal set ("hints") by looking at all the existing objects.
When the library asks the driver whether two objects can be aggregated the driver only compares the provided masks and ignores the A-TCAM / C-TCAM indication. This is the right thing to do since the goal is to move as many filters as possible to the A-TCAM. The driver also forbids two identical masks from being aggregated since this can only happen if one was intentionally put in the C-TCAM to avoid a conflict in the A-TCAM.
The above can result in the following set of hints:
H1: {mask X, A-TCAM} -> H2: {mask Y, A-TCAM} // X is Y + delta H3: {mask Y, C-TCAM} -> H4: {mask Z, A-TCAM} // Y is Z + delta
After getting the hints from the library the driver will start migrating filters from one region to another while consulting the computed hints and instructing the device to perform a lookup in both regions during the transition.
Assuming a filter with mask X is being migrated into the A-TCAM in the new region, the hints lookup will return H1. Since H2 is the parent of H1, the library will try to find the object associated with it and create it if necessary in which case another hints lookup (recursive) will be performed. This hints lookup for {mask Y, A-TCAM} will either return H2 or H3 since the driver passes the library an object comparison function that ignores the A-TCAM / C-TCAM indication.
This can eventually lead to nested objects which are not supported by the library [1].
Fix by removing the object comparison function from both the driver and the library as the driver was the only user. That way the lookup will only return exact matches.
I do not have a reliable reproducer that can reproduce the issue in a timely manner, but before the fix the issue would reproduce in several minutes and with the fix it does not reproduce in over an hour.
Note that the current usefulness of the hints is limited because they include the C-TCAM indication and represent aggregation that cannot actually happen. This will be addressed in net-next.
[1] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 153 at lib/objagg.c:170 objagg_obj_parent_assign+0xb5/0xd0 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 153 Comm: kworker/0:18 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc6-custom-g70fbc2c1c38b #42 Hardware name: Mellanox Technologies Ltd. MSN3700C/VMOD0008, BIOS 5.11 10/10/2018 Workqueue: mlxsw_core mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work RIP: 0010:objagg_obj_parent_assign+0xb5/0xd0 [...] Call Trace: <TASK> __objagg_obj_get+0x2bb/0x580 objagg_obj_get+0xe/0x80 mlxsw_sp_acl_erp_mask_get+0xb5/0xf0 mlxsw_sp_acl_atcam_entry_add+0xe8/0x3c0 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_entry_create+0x5e/0xa0 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vchunk_migrate_one+0x16b/0x270 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work+0xbe/0x510 process_one_work+0x151/0x370(CVE-2024-43880)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
gpio: prevent potential speculation leaks in gpio_device_get_desc()
Userspace may trigger a speculative read of an address outside the gpio descriptor array. Users can do that by calling gpio_ioctl() with an offset out of range. Offset is copied from user and then used as an array index to get the gpio descriptor without sanitization in gpio_device_get_desc().
This change ensures that the offset is sanitized by using array_index_nospec() to mitigate any possibility of speculative information leaks.
This bug was discovered and resolved using Coverity Static Analysis Security Testing (SAST) by Synopsys, Inc.(CVE-2024-44931)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
driver core: Fix uevent_show() vs driver detach race
uevent_show() wants to de-reference dev->driver->name. There is no clean way for a device attribute to de-reference dev->driver unless that attribute is defined via (struct device_driver).dev_groups. Instead, the anti-pattern of taking the device_lock() in the attribute handler risks deadlocks with code paths that remove device attributes while holding the lock.
This deadlock is typically invisible to lockdep given the device_lock() is marked lockdep_set_novalidate_class(), but some subsystems allocate a local lockdep key for @dev->mutex to reveal reports of the form:
====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.10.0-rc7+ #275 Tainted: G OE N
modprobe/2374 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8c2270070de0 (kn->active#6){++++}-{0:0}, at: __kernfs_remove+0xde/0x220
but task is already holding lock: ffff8c22016e88f8 (&cxl_root_key){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x39/0x210
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (&cxl_root_key){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x99/0xc30 uevent_show+0xac/0x130 dev_attr_show+0x18/0x40 sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xac/0xf0 seq_read_iter+0x110/0x450 vfs_read+0x25b/0x340 ksys_read+0x67/0xf0 do_syscall_64+0x75/0x190 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
-> #0 (kn->active#6){++++}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x121a/0x1fa0 lock_acquire+0xd6/0x2e0 kernfs_drain+0x1e9/0x200 __kernfs_remove+0xde/0x220 kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x5e/0xa0 device_del+0x168/0x410 device_unregister+0x13/0x60 devres_release_all+0xb8/0x110 device_unbind_cleanup+0xe/0x70 device_release_driver_internal+0x1c7/0x210 driver_detach+0x47/0x90 bus_remove_driver+0x6c/0xf0 cxl_acpi_exit+0xc/0x11 [cxl_acpi] __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x181/0x260 do_syscall_64+0x75/0x190 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
The observation though is that driver objects are typically much longer lived than device objects. It is reasonable to perform lockless de-reference of a @driver pointer even if it is racing detach from a device. Given the infrequency of driver unregistration, use synchronize_rcu() in module_remove_driver() to close any potential races. It is potentially overkill to suffer synchronize_rcu() just to handle the rare module removal racing uevent_show() event.
Thanks to Tetsuo Handa for the debug analysis of the syzbot report [1].(CVE-2024-44952)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bonding: fix xfrm real_dev null pointer dereference
We shouldn't set real_dev to NULL because packets can be in transit and xfrm might call xdo_dev_offload_ok() in parallel. All callbacks assume real_dev is set.
Example trace: kernel: BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 0000000000001030 kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): making interface the new active one kernel: #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode kernel: #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page kernel: PGD 0 P4D 0 kernel: Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT SMP kernel: CPU: 4 PID: 2237 Comm: ping Not tainted 6.7.7+ #12 kernel: Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-2.fc40 04/01/2014 kernel: RIP: 0010:nsim_ipsec_offload_ok+0xc/0x20 [netdevsim] kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): bond_ipsec_add_sa_all: failed to add SA kernel: Code: e0 0f 0b 48 83 7f 38 00 74 de 0f 0b 48 8b 47 08 48 8b 37 48 8b 78 40 e9 b2 e5 9a d7 66 90 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 8b 86 80 02 00 00 <83> 80 30 10 00 00 01 b8 01 00 00 00 c3 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 0f 1f kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): making interface the new active one kernel: RSP: 0018:ffffabde81553b98 EFLAGS: 00010246 kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): bond_ipsec_add_sa_all: failed to add SA kernel: kernel: RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff9eb404e74900 RCX: ffff9eb403d97c60 kernel: RDX: ffffffffc090de10 RSI: ffff9eb404e74900 RDI: ffff9eb3c5de9e00 kernel: RBP: ffff9eb3c0a42000 R08: 0000000000000010 R09: 0000000000000014 kernel: R10: 7974203030303030 R11: 3030303030303030 R12: 0000000000000000 kernel: R13: ffff9eb3c5de9e00 R14: ffffabde81553cc8 R15: ffff9eb404c53000 kernel: FS: 00007f2a77a3ad00(0000) GS:ffff9eb43bd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 kernel: CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 kernel: CR2: 0000000000001030 CR3: 00000001122ab000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0 kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): making interface the new active one kernel: Call Trace: kernel: <TASK> kernel: ? __die+0x1f/0x60 kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): bond_ipsec_add_sa_all: failed to add SA kernel: ? page_fault_oops+0x142/0x4c0 kernel: ? do_user_addr_fault+0x65/0x670 kernel: ? kvm_read_and_reset_apf_flags+0x3b/0x50 kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): making interface the new active one kernel: ? exc_page_fault+0x7b/0x180 kernel: ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30 kernel: ? nsim_bpf_uninit+0x50/0x50 [netdevsim] kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): bond_ipsec_add_sa_all: failed to add SA kernel: ? nsim_ipsec_offload_ok+0xc/0x20 [netdevsim] kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): making interface the new active one kernel: bond_ipsec_offload_ok+0x7b/0x90 [bonding] kernel: xfrm_output+0x61/0x3b0 kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): bond_ipsec_add_sa_all: failed to add SA kernel: ip_push_pending_frames+0x56/0x80(CVE-2024-44989)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bonding: fix null pointer deref in bond_ipsec_offload_ok
We must check if there is an active slave before dereferencing the pointer.(CVE-2024-44990)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
dmaengine: altera-msgdma: properly free descriptor in msgdma_free_descriptor
Remove list_del call in msgdma_chan_desc_cleanup, this should be the role of msgdma_free_descriptor. In consequence replace list_add_tail with list_move_tail in msgdma_free_descriptor.
This fixes the path: msgdma_free_chan_resources -> msgdma_free_descriptors -> msgdma_free_desc_list -> msgdma_free_descriptor
which does not correctly free the descriptors as first nodes were not removed from the list.(CVE-2024-46716)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: Stop amdgpu_dm initialize when stream nums greater than 6
[Why] Coverity reports OVERRUN warning. Should abort amdgpu_dm initialize.
[How] Return failure to amdgpu_dm_init.(CVE-2024-46817)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
arm64: acpi: Harden get_cpu_for_acpi_id() against missing CPU entry
In a review discussion of the changes to support vCPU hotplug where a check was added on the GICC being enabled if was online, it was noted that there is need to map back to the cpu and use that to index into a cpumask. As such, a valid ID is needed.
If an MPIDR check fails in acpi_map_gic_cpu_interface() it is possible for the entry in cpu_madt_gicc[cpu] == NULL. This function would then cause a NULL pointer dereference. Whilst a path to trigger this has not been established, harden this caller against the possibility.(CVE-2024-46822)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
platform/x86: panasonic-laptop: Fix SINF array out of bounds accesses
The panasonic laptop code in various places uses the SINF array with index values of 0 - SINF_CUR_BRIGHT(0x0d) without checking that the SINF array is big enough.
Not all panasonic laptops have this many SINF array entries, for example the Toughbook CF-18 model only has 10 SINF array entries. So it only supports the AC+DC brightness entries and mute.
Check that the SINF array has a minimum size which covers all AC+DC brightness entries and refuse to load if the SINF array is smaller.
For higher SINF indexes hide the sysfs attributes when the SINF array does not contain an entry for that attribute, avoiding show()/store() accessing the array out of bounds and add bounds checking to the probe() and resume() code accessing these.(CVE-2024-46859)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: Avoid overflow from uint32_t to uint8_t
[WHAT & HOW] dmub_rb_cmd's ramping_boundary has size of uint8_t and it is assigned 0xFFFF. Fix it by changing it to uint8_t with value of 0xFF.
This fixes 2 INTEGER_OVERFLOW issues reported by Coverity.(CVE-2024-47661)
| URL | Type | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"kernel-5.10.0-233.0.0.135.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-233.0.0.135.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-233.0.0.135.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-233.0.0.135.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-233.0.0.135.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-233.0.0.135.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-233.0.0.135.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-233.0.0.135.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-233.0.0.135.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-233.0.0.135.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-233.0.0.135.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-233.0.0.135.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-233.0.0.135.oe2203sp3.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-5.10.0-233.0.0.135.oe2203sp3.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"kernel-5.10.0-233.0.0.135.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-233.0.0.135.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-233.0.0.135.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-233.0.0.135.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-233.0.0.135.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-233.0.0.135.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-233.0.0.135.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-233.0.0.135.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-233.0.0.135.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-233.0.0.135.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-233.0.0.135.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-233.0.0.135.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-233.0.0.135.oe2203sp3.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP3",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP3"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.10.0-233.0.0.135.oe2203sp3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "Critical"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nocteontx2-af: Use separate handlers for interrupts\r\n\r\nFor PF to AF interrupt vector and VF to AF vector same\ninterrupt handler is registered which is causing race condition.\nWhen two interrupts are raised to two CPUs at same time\nthen two cores serve same event corrupting the data.(CVE-2024-27030)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmedia: go7007: fix a memleak in go7007_load_encoder\r\n\r\nIn go7007_load_encoder, bounce(i.e. go-\u0026gt;boot_fw), is allocated without\na deallocation thereafter. After the following call chain:\r\n\r\nsaa7134_go7007_init\n |-\u0026gt; go7007_boot_encoder\n |-\u0026gt; go7007_load_encoder\n |-\u0026gt; kfree(go)\r\n\r\ngo is freed and thus bounce is leaked.(CVE-2024-27074)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnetfilter: nf_tables: use timestamp to check for set element timeout\r\n\r\nAdd a timestamp field at the beginning of the transaction, store it\nin the nftables per-netns area.\r\n\r\nUpdate set backend .insert, .deactivate and sync gc path to use the\ntimestamp, this avoids that an element expires while control plane\ntransaction is still unfinished.\r\n\r\n.lookup and .update, which are used from packet path, still use the\ncurrent time to check if the element has expired. And .get path and dump\nalso since this runs lockless under rcu read size lock. Then, there is\nasync gc which also needs to check the current time since it runs\nasynchronously from a workqueue.(CVE-2024-27397)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ntee: optee: Fix kernel panic caused by incorrect error handling\r\n\r\nThe error path while failing to register devices on the TEE bus has a\nbug leading to kernel panic as follows:\r\n\r\n[ 15.398930] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffff07ed00626d7c\n[ 15.406913] Mem abort info:\n[ 15.409722] ESR = 0x0000000096000005\n[ 15.413490] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits\n[ 15.418814] SET = 0, FnV = 0\n[ 15.421878] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0\n[ 15.425031] FSC = 0x05: level 1 translation fault\n[ 15.429922] Data abort info:\n[ 15.432813] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000005, ISS2 = 0x00000000\n[ 15.438310] CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0\n[ 15.443372] GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0\n[ 15.448697] swapper pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=00000000d9e3e000\n[ 15.455413] [ffff07ed00626d7c] pgd=1800000bffdf9003, p4d=1800000bffdf9003, pud=0000000000000000\n[ 15.464146] Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000005 [#1] PREEMPT SMP\r\n\r\nCommit 7269cba53d90 (\u0026quot;tee: optee: Fix supplicant based device enumeration\u0026quot;)\nlead to the introduction of this bug. So fix it appropriately.(CVE-2024-35785)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/lima: fix a memleak in lima_heap_alloc\r\n\r\nWhen lima_vm_map_bo fails, the resources need to be deallocated, or\nthere will be memleaks.(CVE-2024-35829)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet/sched: taprio: extend minimum interval restriction to entire cycle too\r\n\r\nIt is possible for syzbot to side-step the restriction imposed by the\nblamed commit in the Fixes: tag, because the taprio UAPI permits a\ncycle-time different from (and potentially shorter than) the sum of\nentry intervals.\r\n\r\nWe need one more restriction, which is that the cycle time itself must\nbe larger than N * ETH_ZLEN bit times, where N is the number of schedule\nentries. This restriction needs to apply regardless of whether the cycle\ntime came from the user or was the implicit, auto-calculated value, so\nwe move the existing \u0026quot;cycle == 0\u0026quot; check outside the \u0026quot;if \u0026quot;(!new-\u0026gt;cycle_time)\u0026quot;\nbranch. This way covers both conditions and scenarios.\r\n\r\nAdd a selftest which illustrates the issue triggered by syzbot.(CVE-2024-36244)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nipv4: Fix uninit-value access in __ip_make_skb()\r\n\r\nKMSAN reported uninit-value access in __ip_make_skb() [1]. __ip_make_skb()\ntests HDRINCL to know if the skb has icmphdr. However, HDRINCL can cause a\nrace condition. If calling setsockopt(2) with IP_HDRINCL changes HDRINCL\nwhile __ip_make_skb() is running, the function will access icmphdr in the\nskb even if it is not included. This causes the issue reported by KMSAN.\r\n\r\nCheck FLOWI_FLAG_KNOWN_NH on fl4-\u0026gt;flowi4_flags instead of testing HDRINCL\non the socket.\r\n\r\nAlso, fl4-\u0026gt;fl4_icmp_type and fl4-\u0026gt;fl4_icmp_code are not initialized. These\nare union in struct flowi4 and are implicitly initialized by\nflowi4_init_output(), but we should not rely on specific union layout.\r\n\r\nInitialize these explicitly in raw_sendmsg().\r\n\r\n[1]\nBUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in __ip_make_skb+0x2b74/0x2d20 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:1481\n __ip_make_skb+0x2b74/0x2d20 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:1481\n ip_finish_skb include/net/ip.h:243 [inline]\n ip_push_pending_frames+0x4c/0x5c0 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:1508\n raw_sendmsg+0x2381/0x2690 net/ipv4/raw.c:654\n inet_sendmsg+0x27b/0x2a0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:851\n sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]\n __sock_sendmsg+0x274/0x3c0 net/socket.c:745\n __sys_sendto+0x62c/0x7b0 net/socket.c:2191\n __do_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2203 [inline]\n __se_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2199 [inline]\n __x64_sys_sendto+0x130/0x200 net/socket.c:2199\n do_syscall_64+0xd8/0x1f0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75\r\n\r\nUninit was created at:\n slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3804 [inline]\n slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3845 [inline]\n kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x5f6/0xc50 mm/slub.c:3888\n kmalloc_reserve+0x13c/0x4a0 net/core/skbuff.c:577\n __alloc_skb+0x35a/0x7c0 net/core/skbuff.c:668\n alloc_skb include/linux/skbuff.h:1318 [inline]\n __ip_append_data+0x49ab/0x68c0 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:1128\n ip_append_data+0x1e7/0x260 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:1365\n raw_sendmsg+0x22b1/0x2690 net/ipv4/raw.c:648\n inet_sendmsg+0x27b/0x2a0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:851\n sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]\n __sock_sendmsg+0x274/0x3c0 net/socket.c:745\n __sys_sendto+0x62c/0x7b0 net/socket.c:2191\n __do_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2203 [inline]\n __se_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2199 [inline]\n __x64_sys_sendto+0x130/0x200 net/socket.c:2199\n do_syscall_64+0xd8/0x1f0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75\r\n\r\nCPU: 1 PID: 15709 Comm: syz-executor.7 Not tainted 6.8.0-11567-gb3603fcb79b1 #25\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-1.fc39 04/01/2014(CVE-2024-36927)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet/mlx5e: Fix netif state handling\r\n\r\nmlx5e_suspend cleans resources only if netif_device_present() returns\ntrue. However, mlx5e_resume changes the state of netif, via\nmlx5e_nic_enable, only if reg_state == NETREG_REGISTERED.\nIn the below case, the above leads to NULL-ptr Oops[1] and memory\nleaks:\r\n\r\nmlx5e_probe\n _mlx5e_resume\n mlx5e_attach_netdev\n mlx5e_nic_enable \u0026lt;-- netdev not reg, not calling netif_device_attach()\n register_netdev \u0026lt;-- failed for some reason.\nERROR_FLOW:\n _mlx5e_suspend \u0026lt;-- netif_device_present return false, resources aren\u0026apos;t freed :(\r\n\r\nHence, clean resources in this case as well.\r\n\r\n[1]\nBUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000\nPGD 0 P4D 0\nOops: 0010 [#1] SMP\nCPU: 2 PID: 9345 Comm: test-ovs-ct-gen Not tainted 6.5.0_for_upstream_min_debug_2023_09_05_16_01 #1\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014\nRIP: 0010:0x0\nCode: Unable to access opcode bytes at0xffffffffffffffd6.\nRSP: 0018:ffff888178aaf758 EFLAGS: 00010246\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n ? __die+0x20/0x60\n ? page_fault_oops+0x14c/0x3c0\n ? exc_page_fault+0x75/0x140\n ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30\n notifier_call_chain+0x35/0xb0\n blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x3d/0x60\n mlx5_blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x22/0x30 [mlx5_core]\n mlx5_core_uplink_netdev_event_replay+0x3e/0x60 [mlx5_core]\n mlx5_mdev_netdev_track+0x53/0x60 [mlx5_ib]\n mlx5_ib_roce_init+0xc3/0x340 [mlx5_ib]\n __mlx5_ib_add+0x34/0xd0 [mlx5_ib]\n mlx5r_probe+0xe1/0x210 [mlx5_ib]\n ? auxiliary_match_id+0x6a/0x90\n auxiliary_bus_probe+0x38/0x80\n ? driver_sysfs_add+0x51/0x80\n really_probe+0xc9/0x3e0\n ? driver_probe_device+0x90/0x90\n __driver_probe_device+0x80/0x160\n driver_probe_device+0x1e/0x90\n __device_attach_driver+0x7d/0x100\n bus_for_each_drv+0x80/0xd0\n __device_attach+0xbc/0x1f0\n bus_probe_device+0x86/0xa0\n device_add+0x637/0x840\n __auxiliary_device_add+0x3b/0xa0\n add_adev+0xc9/0x140 [mlx5_core]\n mlx5_rescan_drivers_locked+0x22a/0x310 [mlx5_core]\n mlx5_register_device+0x53/0xa0 [mlx5_core]\n mlx5_init_one_devl_locked+0x5c4/0x9c0 [mlx5_core]\n mlx5_init_one+0x3b/0x60 [mlx5_core]\n probe_one+0x44c/0x730 [mlx5_core]\n local_pci_probe+0x3e/0x90\n pci_device_probe+0xbf/0x210\n ? kernfs_create_link+0x5d/0xa0\n ? sysfs_do_create_link_sd+0x60/0xc0\n really_probe+0xc9/0x3e0\n ? driver_probe_device+0x90/0x90\n __driver_probe_device+0x80/0x160\n driver_probe_device+0x1e/0x90\n __device_attach_driver+0x7d/0x100\n bus_for_each_drv+0x80/0xd0\n __device_attach+0xbc/0x1f0\n pci_bus_add_device+0x54/0x80\n pci_iov_add_virtfn+0x2e6/0x320\n sriov_enable+0x208/0x420\n mlx5_core_sriov_configure+0x9e/0x200 [mlx5_core]\n sriov_numvfs_store+0xae/0x1a0\n kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x10c/0x1a0\n vfs_write+0x291/0x3c0\n ksys_write+0x5f/0xe0\n do_syscall_64+0x3d/0x90\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0\n CR2: 0000000000000000\n ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---(CVE-2024-38608)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nipv6: sr: fix invalid unregister error path\r\n\r\nThe error path of seg6_init() is wrong in case CONFIG_IPV6_SEG6_LWTUNNEL\nis not defined. In that case if seg6_hmac_init() fails, the\ngenl_unregister_family() isn\u0026apos;t called.\r\n\r\nThis issue exist since commit 46738b1317e1 (\u0026quot;ipv6: sr: add option to control\nlwtunnel support\u0026quot;), and commit 5559cea2d5aa (\u0026quot;ipv6: sr: fix possible\nuse-after-free and null-ptr-deref\u0026quot;) replaced unregister_pernet_subsys()\nwith genl_unregister_family() in this error path.(CVE-2024-38612)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ngreybus: Fix use-after-free bug in gb_interface_release due to race condition.\r\n\r\nIn gb_interface_create, \u0026amp;intf-\u0026gt;mode_switch_completion is bound with\ngb_interface_mode_switch_work. Then it will be started by\ngb_interface_request_mode_switch. Here is the relevant code.\nif (!queue_work(system_long_wq, \u0026amp;intf-\u0026gt;mode_switch_work)) {\n\t...\n}\r\n\r\nIf we call gb_interface_release to make cleanup, there may be an\nunfinished work. This function will call kfree to free the object\n\u0026quot;intf\u0026quot;. However, if gb_interface_mode_switch_work is scheduled to\nrun after kfree, it may cause use-after-free error as\ngb_interface_mode_switch_work will use the object \u0026quot;intf\u0026quot;.\nThe possible execution flow that may lead to the issue is as follows:\r\n\r\nCPU0 CPU1\r\n\r\n | gb_interface_create\n | gb_interface_request_mode_switch\ngb_interface_release |\nkfree(intf) (free) |\n | gb_interface_mode_switch_work\n | mutex_lock(\u0026amp;intf-\u0026gt;mutex) (use)\r\n\r\nFix it by canceling the work before kfree.(CVE-2024-39495)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnetns: Make get_net_ns() handle zero refcount net\r\n\r\nSyzkaller hit a warning:\nrefcount_t: addition on 0; use-after-free.\nWARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 7890 at lib/refcount.c:25 refcount_warn_saturate+0xdf/0x1d0\nModules linked in:\nCPU: 3 PID: 7890 Comm: tun Not tainted 6.10.0-rc3-00100-gcaa4f9578aba-dirty #310\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014\nRIP: 0010:refcount_warn_saturate+0xdf/0x1d0\nCode: 41 49 04 31 ff 89 de e8 9f 1e cd fe 84 db 75 9c e8 76 26 cd fe c6 05 b6 41 49 04 01 90 48 c7 c7 b8 8e 25 86 e8 d2 05 b5 fe 90 \u0026lt;0f\u0026gt; 0b 90 90 e9 79 ff ff ff e8 53 26 cd fe 0f b6 1\nRSP: 0018:ffff8881067b7da0 EFLAGS: 00010286\nRAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffffffff811c72ac\nRDX: ffff8881026a2140 RSI: ffffffff811c72b5 RDI: 0000000000000001\nRBP: ffff8881067b7db0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 205b5d3730353139\nR10: 0000000000000000 R11: 205d303938375420 R12: ffff8881086500c4\nR13: ffff8881086500c4 R14: ffff8881086500b0 R15: ffff888108650040\nFS: 00007f5b2961a4c0(0000) GS:ffff88823bd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: 000055d7ed36fd18 CR3: 00000001482f6000 CR4: 00000000000006f0\nDR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\nDR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n ? show_regs+0xa3/0xc0\n ? __warn+0xa5/0x1c0\n ? refcount_warn_saturate+0xdf/0x1d0\n ? report_bug+0x1fc/0x2d0\n ? refcount_warn_saturate+0xdf/0x1d0\n ? handle_bug+0xa1/0x110\n ? exc_invalid_op+0x3c/0xb0\n ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1f/0x30\n ? __warn_printk+0xcc/0x140\n ? __warn_printk+0xd5/0x140\n ? refcount_warn_saturate+0xdf/0x1d0\n get_net_ns+0xa4/0xc0\n ? __pfx_get_net_ns+0x10/0x10\n open_related_ns+0x5a/0x130\n __tun_chr_ioctl+0x1616/0x2370\n ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_switch+0x58/0xa0\n ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp2+0x1c/0x30\n ? __pfx_tun_chr_ioctl+0x10/0x10\n tun_chr_ioctl+0x2f/0x40\n __x64_sys_ioctl+0x11b/0x160\n x64_sys_call+0x1211/0x20d0\n do_syscall_64+0x9e/0x1d0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f\nRIP: 0033:0x7f5b28f165d7\nCode: b3 66 90 48 8b 05 b1 48 2d 00 64 c7 00 26 00 00 00 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 \u0026lt;48\u0026gt; 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 81 48 2d 00 8\nRSP: 002b:00007ffc2b59c5e8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010\nRAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f5b28f165d7\nRDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000000054e3 RDI: 0000000000000003\nRBP: 00007ffc2b59c650 R08: 00007f5b291ed8c0 R09: 00007f5b2961a4c0\nR10: 0000000029690010 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000400730\nR13: 00007ffc2b59cf40 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\nKernel panic - not syncing: kernel: panic_on_warn set ...\r\n\r\nThis is trigger as below:\n ns0 ns1\ntun_set_iff() //dev is tun0\n tun-\u0026gt;dev = dev\n//ip link set tun0 netns ns1\n put_net() //ref is 0\n__tun_chr_ioctl() //TUNGETDEVNETNS\n net = dev_net(tun-\u0026gt;dev);\n open_related_ns(\u0026amp;net-\u0026gt;ns, get_net_ns); //ns1\n get_net_ns()\n get_net() //addition on 0\r\n\r\nUse maybe_get_net() in get_net_ns in case net\u0026apos;s ref is zero to fix this(CVE-2024-40958)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nscsi: qla2xxx: During vport delete send async logout explicitly\r\n\r\nDuring vport delete, it is observed that during unload we hit a crash\nbecause of stale entries in outstanding command array. For all these stale\nI/O entries, eh_abort was issued and aborted (fast_fail_io = 2009h) but\nI/Os could not complete while vport delete is in process of deleting.\r\n\r\n BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 000000000000001c\n #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode\n #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page\n PGD 0 P4D 0\n Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI\n Workqueue: qla2xxx_wq qla_do_work [qla2xxx]\n RIP: 0010:dma_direct_unmap_sg+0x51/0x1e0\n RSP: 0018:ffffa1e1e150fc68 EFLAGS: 00010046\n RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000021 RCX: 0000000000000001\n RDX: 0000000000000021 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff8ce208a7a0d0\n RBP: ffff8ce208a7a0d0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff8ce378aac9c8\n R10: ffff8ce378aac8a0 R11: ffffa1e1e150f9d8 R12: 0000000000000000\n R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff8ce378aac9c8 R15: 0000000000000000\n FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8d217f000000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n CR2: 000000000000001c CR3: 0000002089acc000 CR4: 0000000000350ee0\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n qla2xxx_qpair_sp_free_dma+0x417/0x4e0\n ? qla2xxx_qpair_sp_compl+0x10d/0x1a0\n ? qla2x00_status_entry+0x768/0x2830\n ? newidle_balance+0x2f0/0x430\n ? dequeue_entity+0x100/0x3c0\n ? qla24xx_process_response_queue+0x6a1/0x19e0\n ? __schedule+0x2d5/0x1140\n ? qla_do_work+0x47/0x60\n ? process_one_work+0x267/0x440\n ? process_one_work+0x440/0x440\n ? worker_thread+0x2d/0x3d0\n ? process_one_work+0x440/0x440\n ? kthread+0x156/0x180\n ? set_kthread_struct+0x50/0x50\n ? ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\r\n\r\nSend out async logout explicitly for all the ports during vport delete.(CVE-2024-42289)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: flow_dissector: use DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE\r\n\r\nThe following splat is easy to reproduce upstream as well as in -stable\nkernels. Florian Westphal provided the following commit:\r\n\r\n d1dab4f71d37 (\u0026quot;net: add and use __skb_get_hash_symmetric_net\u0026quot;)\r\n\r\nbut this complementary fix has been also suggested by Willem de Bruijn\nand it can be easily backported to -stable kernel which consists in\nusing DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE instead to silence the following splat\ngiven __skb_get_hash() is used by the nftables tracing infrastructure to\nto identify packets in traces.\r\n\r\n[69133.561393] ------------[ cut here ]------------\n[69133.561404] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 43576 at net/core/flow_dissector.c:1104 __skb_flow_dissect+0x134f/\n[...]\n[69133.561944] CPU: 0 PID: 43576 Comm: socat Not tainted 6.10.0-rc7+ #379\n[69133.561959] RIP: 0010:__skb_flow_dissect+0x134f/0x2ad0\n[69133.561970] Code: 83 f9 04 0f 84 b3 00 00 00 45 85 c9 0f 84 aa 00 00 00 41 83 f9 02 0f 84 81 fc ff\nff 44 0f b7 b4 24 80 00 00 00 e9 8b f9 ff ff \u0026lt;0f\u0026gt; 0b e9 20 f3 ff ff 41 f6 c6 20 0f 84 e4 ef ff ff 48 8d 7b 12 e8\n[69133.561979] RSP: 0018:ffffc90000006fc0 EFLAGS: 00010246\n[69133.561988] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffff82f33e20 RCX: ffffffff81ab7e19\n[69133.561994] RDX: dffffc0000000000 RSI: ffffc90000007388 RDI: ffff888103a1b418\n[69133.562001] RBP: ffffc90000007310 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000\n[69133.562007] R10: ffffc90000007388 R11: ffffffff810cface R12: ffff888103a1b400\n[69133.562013] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffffffff82f33e2a R15: ffffffff82f33e28\n[69133.562020] FS: 00007f40f7131740(0000) GS:ffff888390800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n[69133.562027] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n[69133.562033] CR2: 00007f40f7346ee0 CR3: 000000015d200001 CR4: 00000000001706f0\n[69133.562040] Call Trace:\n[69133.562044] \u0026lt;IRQ\u0026gt;\n[69133.562049] ? __warn+0x9f/0x1a0\n[ 1211.841384] ? __skb_flow_dissect+0x107e/0x2860\n[...]\n[ 1211.841496] ? bpf_flow_dissect+0x160/0x160\n[ 1211.841753] __skb_get_hash+0x97/0x280\n[ 1211.841765] ? __skb_get_hash_symmetric+0x230/0x230\n[ 1211.841776] ? mod_find+0xbf/0xe0\n[ 1211.841786] ? get_stack_info_noinstr+0x12/0xe0\n[ 1211.841798] ? bpf_ksym_find+0x56/0xe0\n[ 1211.841807] ? __rcu_read_unlock+0x2a/0x70\n[ 1211.841819] nft_trace_init+0x1b9/0x1c0 [nf_tables]\n[ 1211.841895] ? nft_trace_notify+0x830/0x830 [nf_tables]\n[ 1211.841964] ? get_stack_info+0x2b/0x80\n[ 1211.841975] ? nft_do_chain_arp+0x80/0x80 [nf_tables]\n[ 1211.842044] nft_do_chain+0x79c/0x850 [nf_tables](CVE-2024-42321)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmlxsw: spectrum_acl_erp: Fix object nesting warning\r\n\r\nACLs in Spectrum-2 and newer ASICs can reside in the algorithmic TCAM\n(A-TCAM) or in the ordinary circuit TCAM (C-TCAM). The former can\ncontain more ACLs (i.e., tc filters), but the number of masks in each\nregion (i.e., tc chain) is limited.\r\n\r\nIn order to mitigate the effects of the above limitation, the device\nallows filters to share a single mask if their masks only differ in up\nto 8 consecutive bits. For example, dst_ip/25 can be represented using\ndst_ip/24 with a delta of 1 bit. The C-TCAM does not have a limit on the\nnumber of masks being used (and therefore does not support mask\naggregation), but can contain a limited number of filters.\r\n\r\nThe driver uses the \u0026quot;objagg\u0026quot; library to perform the mask aggregation by\npassing it objects that consist of the filter\u0026apos;s mask and whether the\nfilter is to be inserted into the A-TCAM or the C-TCAM since filters in\ndifferent TCAMs cannot share a mask.\r\n\r\nThe set of created objects is dependent on the insertion order of the\nfilters and is not necessarily optimal. Therefore, the driver will\nperiodically ask the library to compute a more optimal set (\u0026quot;hints\u0026quot;) by\nlooking at all the existing objects.\r\n\r\nWhen the library asks the driver whether two objects can be aggregated\nthe driver only compares the provided masks and ignores the A-TCAM /\nC-TCAM indication. This is the right thing to do since the goal is to\nmove as many filters as possible to the A-TCAM. The driver also forbids\ntwo identical masks from being aggregated since this can only happen if\none was intentionally put in the C-TCAM to avoid a conflict in the\nA-TCAM.\r\n\r\nThe above can result in the following set of hints:\r\n\r\nH1: {mask X, A-TCAM} -\u0026gt; H2: {mask Y, A-TCAM} // X is Y + delta\nH3: {mask Y, C-TCAM} -\u0026gt; H4: {mask Z, A-TCAM} // Y is Z + delta\r\n\r\nAfter getting the hints from the library the driver will start migrating\nfilters from one region to another while consulting the computed hints\nand instructing the device to perform a lookup in both regions during\nthe transition.\r\n\r\nAssuming a filter with mask X is being migrated into the A-TCAM in the\nnew region, the hints lookup will return H1. Since H2 is the parent of\nH1, the library will try to find the object associated with it and\ncreate it if necessary in which case another hints lookup (recursive)\nwill be performed. This hints lookup for {mask Y, A-TCAM} will either\nreturn H2 or H3 since the driver passes the library an object comparison\nfunction that ignores the A-TCAM / C-TCAM indication.\r\n\r\nThis can eventually lead to nested objects which are not supported by\nthe library [1].\r\n\r\nFix by removing the object comparison function from both the driver and\nthe library as the driver was the only user. That way the lookup will\nonly return exact matches.\r\n\r\nI do not have a reliable reproducer that can reproduce the issue in a\ntimely manner, but before the fix the issue would reproduce in several\nminutes and with the fix it does not reproduce in over an hour.\r\n\r\nNote that the current usefulness of the hints is limited because they\ninclude the C-TCAM indication and represent aggregation that cannot\nactually happen. This will be addressed in net-next.\r\n\r\n[1]\nWARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 153 at lib/objagg.c:170 objagg_obj_parent_assign+0xb5/0xd0\nModules linked in:\nCPU: 0 PID: 153 Comm: kworker/0:18 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc6-custom-g70fbc2c1c38b #42\nHardware name: Mellanox Technologies Ltd. MSN3700C/VMOD0008, BIOS 5.11 10/10/2018\nWorkqueue: mlxsw_core mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work\nRIP: 0010:objagg_obj_parent_assign+0xb5/0xd0\n[...]\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n __objagg_obj_get+0x2bb/0x580\n objagg_obj_get+0xe/0x80\n mlxsw_sp_acl_erp_mask_get+0xb5/0xf0\n mlxsw_sp_acl_atcam_entry_add+0xe8/0x3c0\n mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_entry_create+0x5e/0xa0\n mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vchunk_migrate_one+0x16b/0x270\n mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work+0xbe/0x510\n process_one_work+0x151/0x370(CVE-2024-43880)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ngpio: prevent potential speculation leaks in gpio_device_get_desc()\r\n\r\nUserspace may trigger a speculative read of an address outside the gpio\ndescriptor array.\nUsers can do that by calling gpio_ioctl() with an offset out of range.\nOffset is copied from user and then used as an array index to get\nthe gpio descriptor without sanitization in gpio_device_get_desc().\r\n\r\nThis change ensures that the offset is sanitized by using\narray_index_nospec() to mitigate any possibility of speculative\ninformation leaks.\r\n\r\nThis bug was discovered and resolved using Coverity Static Analysis\nSecurity Testing (SAST) by Synopsys, Inc.(CVE-2024-44931)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndriver core: Fix uevent_show() vs driver detach race\r\n\r\nuevent_show() wants to de-reference dev-\u0026gt;driver-\u0026gt;name. There is no clean\nway for a device attribute to de-reference dev-\u0026gt;driver unless that\nattribute is defined via (struct device_driver).dev_groups. Instead, the\nanti-pattern of taking the device_lock() in the attribute handler risks\ndeadlocks with code paths that remove device attributes while holding\nthe lock.\r\n\r\nThis deadlock is typically invisible to lockdep given the device_lock()\nis marked lockdep_set_novalidate_class(), but some subsystems allocate a\nlocal lockdep key for @dev-\u0026gt;mutex to reveal reports of the form:\r\n\r\n ======================================================\n WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected\n 6.10.0-rc7+ #275 Tainted: G OE N\n ------------------------------------------------------\n modprobe/2374 is trying to acquire lock:\n ffff8c2270070de0 (kn-\u0026gt;active#6){++++}-{0:0}, at: __kernfs_remove+0xde/0x220\r\n\r\n but task is already holding lock:\n ffff8c22016e88f8 (\u0026amp;cxl_root_key){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x39/0x210\r\n\r\n which lock already depends on the new lock.\r\n\r\n the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:\r\n\r\n -\u0026gt; #1 (\u0026amp;cxl_root_key){+.+.}-{3:3}:\n __mutex_lock+0x99/0xc30\n uevent_show+0xac/0x130\n dev_attr_show+0x18/0x40\n sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xac/0xf0\n seq_read_iter+0x110/0x450\n vfs_read+0x25b/0x340\n ksys_read+0x67/0xf0\n do_syscall_64+0x75/0x190\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e\r\n\r\n -\u0026gt; #0 (kn-\u0026gt;active#6){++++}-{0:0}:\n __lock_acquire+0x121a/0x1fa0\n lock_acquire+0xd6/0x2e0\n kernfs_drain+0x1e9/0x200\n __kernfs_remove+0xde/0x220\n kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x5e/0xa0\n device_del+0x168/0x410\n device_unregister+0x13/0x60\n devres_release_all+0xb8/0x110\n device_unbind_cleanup+0xe/0x70\n device_release_driver_internal+0x1c7/0x210\n driver_detach+0x47/0x90\n bus_remove_driver+0x6c/0xf0\n cxl_acpi_exit+0xc/0x11 [cxl_acpi]\n __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x181/0x260\n do_syscall_64+0x75/0x190\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e\r\n\r\nThe observation though is that driver objects are typically much longer\nlived than device objects. It is reasonable to perform lockless\nde-reference of a @driver pointer even if it is racing detach from a\ndevice. Given the infrequency of driver unregistration, use\nsynchronize_rcu() in module_remove_driver() to close any potential\nraces. It is potentially overkill to suffer synchronize_rcu() just to\nhandle the rare module removal racing uevent_show() event.\r\n\r\nThanks to Tetsuo Handa for the debug analysis of the syzbot report [1].(CVE-2024-44952)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbonding: fix xfrm real_dev null pointer dereference\r\n\r\nWe shouldn\u0026apos;t set real_dev to NULL because packets can be in transit and\nxfrm might call xdo_dev_offload_ok() in parallel. All callbacks assume\nreal_dev is set.\r\n\r\n Example trace:\n kernel: BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 0000000000001030\n kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): making interface the new active one\n kernel: #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode\n kernel: #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page\n kernel: PGD 0 P4D 0\n kernel: Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT SMP\n kernel: CPU: 4 PID: 2237 Comm: ping Not tainted 6.7.7+ #12\n kernel: Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-2.fc40 04/01/2014\n kernel: RIP: 0010:nsim_ipsec_offload_ok+0xc/0x20 [netdevsim]\n kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): bond_ipsec_add_sa_all: failed to add SA\n kernel: Code: e0 0f 0b 48 83 7f 38 00 74 de 0f 0b 48 8b 47 08 48 8b 37 48 8b 78 40 e9 b2 e5 9a d7 66 90 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 8b 86 80 02 00 00 \u0026lt;83\u0026gt; 80 30 10 00 00 01 b8 01 00 00 00 c3 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 0f 1f\n kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): making interface the new active one\n kernel: RSP: 0018:ffffabde81553b98 EFLAGS: 00010246\n kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): bond_ipsec_add_sa_all: failed to add SA\n kernel:\n kernel: RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff9eb404e74900 RCX: ffff9eb403d97c60\n kernel: RDX: ffffffffc090de10 RSI: ffff9eb404e74900 RDI: ffff9eb3c5de9e00\n kernel: RBP: ffff9eb3c0a42000 R08: 0000000000000010 R09: 0000000000000014\n kernel: R10: 7974203030303030 R11: 3030303030303030 R12: 0000000000000000\n kernel: R13: ffff9eb3c5de9e00 R14: ffffabde81553cc8 R15: ffff9eb404c53000\n kernel: FS: 00007f2a77a3ad00(0000) GS:ffff9eb43bd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n kernel: CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n kernel: CR2: 0000000000001030 CR3: 00000001122ab000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0\n kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): making interface the new active one\n kernel: Call Trace:\n kernel: \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n kernel: ? __die+0x1f/0x60\n kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): bond_ipsec_add_sa_all: failed to add SA\n kernel: ? page_fault_oops+0x142/0x4c0\n kernel: ? do_user_addr_fault+0x65/0x670\n kernel: ? kvm_read_and_reset_apf_flags+0x3b/0x50\n kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): making interface the new active one\n kernel: ? exc_page_fault+0x7b/0x180\n kernel: ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30\n kernel: ? nsim_bpf_uninit+0x50/0x50 [netdevsim]\n kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): bond_ipsec_add_sa_all: failed to add SA\n kernel: ? nsim_ipsec_offload_ok+0xc/0x20 [netdevsim]\n kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): making interface the new active one\n kernel: bond_ipsec_offload_ok+0x7b/0x90 [bonding]\n kernel: xfrm_output+0x61/0x3b0\n kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): bond_ipsec_add_sa_all: failed to add SA\n kernel: ip_push_pending_frames+0x56/0x80(CVE-2024-44989)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbonding: fix null pointer deref in bond_ipsec_offload_ok\r\n\r\nWe must check if there is an active slave before dereferencing the pointer.(CVE-2024-44990)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndmaengine: altera-msgdma: properly free descriptor in msgdma_free_descriptor\r\n\r\nRemove list_del call in msgdma_chan_desc_cleanup, this should be the role\nof msgdma_free_descriptor. In consequence replace list_add_tail with\nlist_move_tail in msgdma_free_descriptor.\r\n\r\nThis fixes the path:\n msgdma_free_chan_resources -\u0026gt; msgdma_free_descriptors -\u0026gt;\n msgdma_free_desc_list -\u0026gt; msgdma_free_descriptor\r\n\r\nwhich does not correctly free the descriptors as first nodes were not\nremoved from the list.(CVE-2024-46716)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amd/display: Stop amdgpu_dm initialize when stream nums greater than 6\r\n\r\n[Why]\nCoverity reports OVERRUN warning. Should abort amdgpu_dm\ninitialize.\r\n\r\n[How]\nReturn failure to amdgpu_dm_init.(CVE-2024-46817)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\narm64: acpi: Harden get_cpu_for_acpi_id() against missing CPU entry\r\n\r\nIn a review discussion of the changes to support vCPU hotplug where\na check was added on the GICC being enabled if was online, it was\nnoted that there is need to map back to the cpu and use that to index\ninto a cpumask. As such, a valid ID is needed.\r\n\r\nIf an MPIDR check fails in acpi_map_gic_cpu_interface() it is possible\nfor the entry in cpu_madt_gicc[cpu] == NULL. This function would\nthen cause a NULL pointer dereference. Whilst a path to trigger\nthis has not been established, harden this caller against the\npossibility.(CVE-2024-46822)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nplatform/x86: panasonic-laptop: Fix SINF array out of bounds accesses\r\n\r\nThe panasonic laptop code in various places uses the SINF array with index\nvalues of 0 - SINF_CUR_BRIGHT(0x0d) without checking that the SINF array\nis big enough.\r\n\r\nNot all panasonic laptops have this many SINF array entries, for example\nthe Toughbook CF-18 model only has 10 SINF array entries. So it only\nsupports the AC+DC brightness entries and mute.\r\n\r\nCheck that the SINF array has a minimum size which covers all AC+DC\nbrightness entries and refuse to load if the SINF array is smaller.\r\n\r\nFor higher SINF indexes hide the sysfs attributes when the SINF array\ndoes not contain an entry for that attribute, avoiding show()/store()\naccessing the array out of bounds and add bounds checking to the probe()\nand resume() code accessing these.(CVE-2024-46859)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amd/display: Avoid overflow from uint32_t to uint8_t\r\n\r\n[WHAT \u0026amp; HOW]\ndmub_rb_cmd\u0026apos;s ramping_boundary has size of uint8_t and it is assigned\n0xFFFF. Fix it by changing it to uint8_t with value of 0xFF.\r\n\r\nThis fixes 2 INTEGER_OVERFLOW issues reported by Coverity.(CVE-2024-47661)",
"id": "OESA-2024-2293",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:07:46Z",
"published": "2024-10-25T11:07:46Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2024-2293"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27030"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27074"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27397"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35785"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35829"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36244"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36927"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38608"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38612"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39495"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40958"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42289"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42321"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43880"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-44931"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-44952"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-44989"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-44990"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46716"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46817"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46822"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46859"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47661"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2024-27030",
"CVE-2024-27074",
"CVE-2024-27397",
"CVE-2024-35785",
"CVE-2024-35829",
"CVE-2024-36244",
"CVE-2024-36927",
"CVE-2024-38608",
"CVE-2024-38612",
"CVE-2024-39495",
"CVE-2024-40958",
"CVE-2024-42289",
"CVE-2024-42321",
"CVE-2024-43880",
"CVE-2024-44931",
"CVE-2024-44952",
"CVE-2024-44989",
"CVE-2024-44990",
"CVE-2024-46716",
"CVE-2024-46817",
"CVE-2024-46822",
"CVE-2024-46859",
"CVE-2024-47661"
]
}
OESA-2024-2295 (CVE-2021-47484)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2024-10-25 11:07 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:07 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
octeontx2-af: Fix possible null pointer dereference.
This patch fixes possible null pointer dereference in files "rvu_debugfs.c" and "rvu_nix.c"(CVE-2021-47484)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tcp: do not accept ACK of bytes we never sent
This patch is based on a detailed report and ideas from Yepeng Pan and Christian Rossow.
ACK seq validation is currently following RFC 5961 5.2 guidelines:
The ACK value is considered acceptable only if it is in the range of ((SND.UNA - MAX.SND.WND) <= SEG.ACK <= SND.NXT). All incoming segments whose ACK value doesn't satisfy the above condition MUST be discarded and an ACK sent back. It needs to be noted that RFC 793 on page 72 (fifth check) says: "If the ACK is a duplicate (SEG.ACK < SND.UNA), it can be ignored. If the ACK acknowledges something not yet sent (SEG.ACK > SND.NXT) then send an ACK, drop the segment, and return". The "ignored" above implies that the processing of the incoming data segment continues, which means the ACK value is treated as acceptable. This mitigation makes the ACK check more stringent since any ACK < SND.UNA wouldn't be accepted, instead only ACKs that are in the range ((SND.UNA - MAX.SND.WND) <= SEG.ACK <= SND.NXT) get through.
This can be refined for new (and possibly spoofed) flows, by not accepting ACK for bytes that were never sent.
This greatly improves TCP security at a little cost.
I added a Fixes: tag to make sure this patch will reach stable trees, even if the 'blamed' patch was adhering to the RFC.
tp->bytes_acked was added in linux-4.2
Following packetdrill test (courtesy of Yepeng Pan) shows the issue at hand:
0 socket(..., SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP) = 3 +0 setsockopt(3, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, [1], 4) = 0 +0 bind(3, ..., ...) = 0 +0 listen(3, 1024) = 0
// ---------------- Handshake ------------------- //
// when window scale is set to 14 the window size can be extended to // 65535 * (2^14) = 1073725440. Linux would accept an ACK packet // with ack number in (Server_ISN+1-1073725440. Server_ISN+1) // ,though this ack number acknowledges some data never // sent by the server.
+0 < S 0:0(0) win 65535 <mss 1400,nop,wscale 14> +0 > S. 0:0(0) ack 1 <...> +0 < . 1:1(0) ack 1 win 65535 +0 accept(3, ..., ...) = 4
// For the established connection, we send an ACK packet, // the ack packet uses ack number 1 - 1073725300 + 2^32, // where 2^32 is used to wrap around. // Note: we used 1073725300 instead of 1073725440 to avoid possible // edge cases. // 1 - 1073725300 + 2^32 = 3221241997
// Oops, old kernels happily accept this packet. +0 < . 1:1001(1000) ack 3221241997 win 65535
// After the kernel fix the following will be replaced by a challenge ACK, // and prior malicious frame would be dropped. +0 > . 1:1(0) ack 1001(CVE-2023-52881)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
octeontx2-af: Use separate handlers for interrupts
For PF to AF interrupt vector and VF to AF vector same interrupt handler is registered which is causing race condition. When two interrupts are raised to two CPUs at same time then two cores serve same event corrupting the data.(CVE-2024-27030)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
media: go7007: fix a memleak in go7007_load_encoder
In go7007_load_encoder, bounce(i.e. go->boot_fw), is allocated without a deallocation thereafter. After the following call chain:
saa7134_go7007_init |-> go7007_boot_encoder |-> go7007_load_encoder |-> kfree(go)
go is freed and thus bounce is leaked.(CVE-2024-27074)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: nft_flow_offload: reset dst in route object after setting up flow
dst is transferred to the flow object, route object does not own it anymore. Reset dst in route object, otherwise if flow_offload_add() fails, error path releases dst twice, leading to a refcount underflow.(CVE-2024-27403)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: mac80211: check/clear fast rx for non-4addr sta VLAN changes
When moving a station out of a VLAN and deleting the VLAN afterwards, the fast_rx entry still holds a pointer to the VLAN's netdev, which can cause use-after-free bugs. Fix this by immediately calling ieee80211_check_fast_rx after the VLAN change.(CVE-2024-35789)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/lima: fix a memleak in lima_heap_alloc
When lima_vm_map_bo fails, the resources need to be deallocated, or there will be memleaks.(CVE-2024-35829)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
riscv: process: Fix kernel gp leakage
childregs represents the registers which are active for the new thread in user context. For a kernel thread, childregs->gp is never used since the kernel gp is not touched by switch_to. For a user mode helper, the gp value can be observed in user space after execve or possibly by other means.
[From the email thread]
The / Kernel thread / comment is somewhat inaccurate in that it is also used for user_mode_helper threads, which exec a user process, e.g. /sbin/init or when /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern is a pipe. Such threads do not have PF_KTHREAD set and are valid targets for ptrace etc. even before they exec.
childregs is the user context during syscall execution and it is observable from userspace in at least five ways:
- kernel_execve does not currently clear integer registers, so the starting register state for PID 1 and other user processes started by the kernel has sp = user stack, gp = kernel __global_pointer$, all other integer registers zeroed by the memset in the patch comment.
This is a bug in its own right, but I'm unwilling to bet that it is the only way to exploit the issue addressed by this patch.
-
ptrace(PTRACE_GETREGSET): you can PTRACE_ATTACH to a user_mode_helper thread before it execs, but ptrace requires SIGSTOP to be delivered which can only happen at user/kernel boundaries.
-
/proc//task//syscall: this is perfectly happy to read pt_regs for user_mode_helpers before the exec completes, but gp is not one of the registers it returns.
-
PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_USER: LOCKDOWN_PERF normally prevents access to kernel addresses via PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR, but due to this bug kernel addresses are also exposed via PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_USER which is permitted under LOCKDOWN_PERF. I have not attempted to write exploit code.
-
Much of the tracing infrastructure allows access to user registers. I have not attempted to determine which forms of tracing allow access to user registers without already allowing access to kernel registers.(CVE-2024-35871)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
i40e: Do not use WQ_MEM_RECLAIM flag for workqueue
Issue reported by customer during SRIOV testing, call trace: When both i40e and the i40iw driver are loaded, a warning in check_flush_dependency is being triggered. This seems to be because of the i40e driver workqueue is allocated with the WQ_MEM_RECLAIM flag, and the i40iw one is not.
Similar error was encountered on ice too and it was fixed by removing the flag. Do the same for i40e too.
[Feb 9 09:08] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ +0.000004] workqueue: WQ_MEM_RECLAIM i40e:i40e_service_task [i40e] is flushing !WQ_MEM_RECLAIM infiniband:0x0 [ +0.000060] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 937 at kernel/workqueue.c:2966 check_flush_dependency+0x10b/0x120 [ +0.000007] Modules linked in: snd_seq_dummy snd_hrtimer snd_seq snd_timer snd_seq_device snd soundcore nls_utf8 cifs cifs_arc4 nls_ucs2_utils rdma_cm iw_cm ib_cm cifs_md4 dns_resolver netfs qrtr rfkill sunrpc vfat fat intel_rapl_msr intel_rapl_common irdma intel_uncore_frequency intel_uncore_frequency_common ice ipmi_ssif isst_if_common skx_edac nfit libnvdimm x86_pkg_temp_thermal intel_powerclamp gnss coretemp ib_uverbs rapl intel_cstate ib_core iTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support acpi_ipmi mei_me ipmi_si intel_uncore ioatdma i2c_i801 joydev pcspkr mei ipmi_devintf lpc_ich intel_pch_thermal i2c_smbus ipmi_msghandler acpi_power_meter acpi_pad xfs libcrc32c ast sd_mod drm_shmem_helper t10_pi drm_kms_helper sg ixgbe drm i40e ahci crct10dif_pclmul libahci crc32_pclmul igb crc32c_intel libata ghash_clmulni_intel i2c_algo_bit mdio dca wmi dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod fuse [ +0.000050] CPU: 0 PID: 937 Comm: kworker/0:3 Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.8.0-rc2-Feb-net_dev-Qiueue-00279-gbd43c5687e05 #1 [ +0.000003] Hardware name: Intel Corporation S2600BPB/S2600BPB, BIOS SE5C620.86B.02.01.0013.121520200651 12/15/2020 [ +0.000001] Workqueue: i40e i40e_service_task [i40e] [ +0.000024] RIP: 0010:check_flush_dependency+0x10b/0x120 [ +0.000003] Code: ff 49 8b 54 24 18 48 8d 8b b0 00 00 00 49 89 e8 48 81 c6 b0 00 00 00 48 c7 c7 b0 97 fa 9f c6 05 8a cc 1f 02 01 e8 35 b3 fd ff <0f> 0b e9 10 ff ff ff 80 3d 78 cc 1f 02 00 75 94 e9 46 ff ff ff 90 [ +0.000002] RSP: 0018:ffffbd294976bcf8 EFLAGS: 00010282 [ +0.000002] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff94d4c483c000 RCX: 0000000000000027 [ +0.000001] RDX: ffff94d47f620bc8 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffff94d47f620bc0 [ +0.000001] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00000000ffff7fff [ +0.000001] R10: ffffbd294976bb98 R11: ffffffffa0be65e8 R12: ffff94c5451ea180 [ +0.000001] R13: ffff94c5ab5e8000 R14: ffff94c5c20b6e05 R15: ffff94c5f1330ab0 [ +0.000001] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff94d47f600000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ +0.000002] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ +0.000001] CR2: 00007f9e6f1fca70 CR3: 0000000038e20004 CR4: 00000000007706f0 [ +0.000000] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ +0.000001] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ +0.000001] PKRU: 55555554 [ +0.000001] Call Trace: [ +0.000001] <TASK> [ +0.000002] ? __warn+0x80/0x130 [ +0.000003] ? check_flush_dependency+0x10b/0x120 [ +0.000002] ? report_bug+0x195/0x1a0 [ +0.000005] ? handle_bug+0x3c/0x70 [ +0.000003] ? exc_invalid_op+0x14/0x70 [ +0.000002] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20 [ +0.000006] ? check_flush_dependency+0x10b/0x120 [ +0.000002] ? check_flush_dependency+0x10b/0x120 [ +0.000002] __flush_workqueue+0x126/0x3f0 [ +0.000015] ib_cache_cleanup_one+0x1c/0xe0 [ib_core] [ +0.000056] __ib_unregister_device+0x6a/0xb0 [ib_core] [ +0.000023] ib_unregister_device_and_put+0x34/0x50 [ib_core] [ +0.000020] i40iw_close+0x4b/0x90 [irdma] [ +0.000022] i40e_notify_client_of_netdev_close+0x54/0xc0 [i40e] [ +0.000035] i40e_service_task+0x126/0x190 [i40e] [ +0.000024] process_one_work+0x174/0x340 [ +0.000003] worker_th ---truncated---(CVE-2024-36004)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mlxsw: spectrum_acl_tcam: Fix warning during rehash
As previously explained, the rehash delayed work migrates filters from one region to another. This is done by iterating over all chunks (all the filters with the same priority) in the region and in each chunk iterating over all the filters.
When the work runs out of credits it stores the current chunk and entry as markers in the per-work context so that it would know where to resume the migration from the next time the work is scheduled.
Upon error, the chunk marker is reset to NULL, but without resetting the entry markers despite being relative to it. This can result in migration being resumed from an entry that does not belong to the chunk being migrated. In turn, this will eventually lead to a chunk being iterated over as if it is an entry. Because of how the two structures happen to be defined, this does not lead to KASAN splats, but to warnings such as [1].
Fix by creating a helper that resets all the markers and call it from all the places the currently only reset the chunk marker. For good measures also call it when starting a completely new rehash. Add a warning to avoid future cases.
[1] WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 1076 at drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/core_acl_flex_keys.c:407 mlxsw_afk_encode+0x242/0x2f0 Modules linked in: CPU: 7 PID: 1076 Comm: kworker/7:24 Tainted: G W 6.9.0-rc3-custom-00880-g29e61d91b77b #29 Hardware name: Mellanox Technologies Ltd. MSN3700/VMOD0005, BIOS 5.11 01/06/2019 Workqueue: mlxsw_core mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work RIP: 0010:mlxsw_afk_encode+0x242/0x2f0 [...] Call Trace: <TASK> mlxsw_sp_acl_atcam_entry_add+0xd9/0x3c0 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_entry_create+0x5e/0xa0 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vchunk_migrate_all+0x109/0x290 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work+0x6c/0x470 process_one_work+0x151/0x370 worker_thread+0x2cb/0x3e0 kthread+0xd0/0x100 ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 </TASK>(CVE-2024-36007)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/sched: taprio: extend minimum interval restriction to entire cycle too
It is possible for syzbot to side-step the restriction imposed by the blamed commit in the Fixes: tag, because the taprio UAPI permits a cycle-time different from (and potentially shorter than) the sum of entry intervals.
We need one more restriction, which is that the cycle time itself must be larger than N * ETH_ZLEN bit times, where N is the number of schedule entries. This restriction needs to apply regardless of whether the cycle time came from the user or was the implicit, auto-calculated value, so we move the existing "cycle == 0" check outside the "if "(!new->cycle_time)" branch. This way covers both conditions and scenarios.
Add a selftest which illustrates the issue triggered by syzbot.(CVE-2024-36244)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/mlx5e: Fix netif state handling
mlx5e_suspend cleans resources only if netif_device_present() returns true. However, mlx5e_resume changes the state of netif, via mlx5e_nic_enable, only if reg_state == NETREG_REGISTERED. In the below case, the above leads to NULL-ptr Oops[1] and memory leaks:
mlx5e_probe _mlx5e_resume mlx5e_attach_netdev mlx5e_nic_enable <-- netdev not reg, not calling netif_device_attach() register_netdev <-- failed for some reason. ERROR_FLOW: _mlx5e_suspend <-- netif_device_present return false, resources aren't freed :(
Hence, clean resources in this case as well.
[1] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000 PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0010 [#1] SMP CPU: 2 PID: 9345 Comm: test-ovs-ct-gen Not tainted 6.5.0_for_upstream_min_debug_2023_09_05_16_01 #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:0x0 Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at0xffffffffffffffd6. RSP: 0018:ffff888178aaf758 EFLAGS: 00010246 Call Trace: <TASK> ? __die+0x20/0x60 ? page_fault_oops+0x14c/0x3c0 ? exc_page_fault+0x75/0x140 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30 notifier_call_chain+0x35/0xb0 blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x3d/0x60 mlx5_blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x22/0x30 [mlx5_core] mlx5_core_uplink_netdev_event_replay+0x3e/0x60 [mlx5_core] mlx5_mdev_netdev_track+0x53/0x60 [mlx5_ib] mlx5_ib_roce_init+0xc3/0x340 [mlx5_ib] __mlx5_ib_add+0x34/0xd0 [mlx5_ib] mlx5r_probe+0xe1/0x210 [mlx5_ib] ? auxiliary_match_id+0x6a/0x90 auxiliary_bus_probe+0x38/0x80 ? driver_sysfs_add+0x51/0x80 really_probe+0xc9/0x3e0 ? driver_probe_device+0x90/0x90 __driver_probe_device+0x80/0x160 driver_probe_device+0x1e/0x90 __device_attach_driver+0x7d/0x100 bus_for_each_drv+0x80/0xd0 __device_attach+0xbc/0x1f0 bus_probe_device+0x86/0xa0 device_add+0x637/0x840 __auxiliary_device_add+0x3b/0xa0 add_adev+0xc9/0x140 [mlx5_core] mlx5_rescan_drivers_locked+0x22a/0x310 [mlx5_core] mlx5_register_device+0x53/0xa0 [mlx5_core] mlx5_init_one_devl_locked+0x5c4/0x9c0 [mlx5_core] mlx5_init_one+0x3b/0x60 [mlx5_core] probe_one+0x44c/0x730 [mlx5_core] local_pci_probe+0x3e/0x90 pci_device_probe+0xbf/0x210 ? kernfs_create_link+0x5d/0xa0 ? sysfs_do_create_link_sd+0x60/0xc0 really_probe+0xc9/0x3e0 ? driver_probe_device+0x90/0x90 __driver_probe_device+0x80/0x160 driver_probe_device+0x1e/0x90 __device_attach_driver+0x7d/0x100 bus_for_each_drv+0x80/0xd0 __device_attach+0xbc/0x1f0 pci_bus_add_device+0x54/0x80 pci_iov_add_virtfn+0x2e6/0x320 sriov_enable+0x208/0x420 mlx5_core_sriov_configure+0x9e/0x200 [mlx5_core] sriov_numvfs_store+0xae/0x1a0 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x10c/0x1a0 vfs_write+0x291/0x3c0 ksys_write+0x5f/0xe0 do_syscall_64+0x3d/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0 CR2: 0000000000000000 ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---(CVE-2024-38608)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipv6: sr: fix invalid unregister error path
The error path of seg6_init() is wrong in case CONFIG_IPV6_SEG6_LWTUNNEL is not defined. In that case if seg6_hmac_init() fails, the genl_unregister_family() isn't called.
This issue exist since commit 46738b1317e1 ("ipv6: sr: add option to control lwtunnel support"), and commit 5559cea2d5aa ("ipv6: sr: fix possible use-after-free and null-ptr-deref") replaced unregister_pernet_subsys() with genl_unregister_family() in this error path.(CVE-2024-38612)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
greybus: Fix use-after-free bug in gb_interface_release due to race condition.
In gb_interface_create, &intf->mode_switch_completion is bound with gb_interface_mode_switch_work. Then it will be started by gb_interface_request_mode_switch. Here is the relevant code. if (!queue_work(system_long_wq, &intf->mode_switch_work)) { ... }
If we call gb_interface_release to make cleanup, there may be an unfinished work. This function will call kfree to free the object "intf". However, if gb_interface_mode_switch_work is scheduled to run after kfree, it may cause use-after-free error as gb_interface_mode_switch_work will use the object "intf". The possible execution flow that may lead to the issue is as follows:
CPU0 CPU1
| gb_interface_create
| gb_interface_request_mode_switch
gb_interface_release | kfree(intf) (free) | | gb_interface_mode_switch_work | mutex_lock(&intf->mutex) (use)
Fix it by canceling the work before kfree.(CVE-2024-39495)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netns: Make get_net_ns() handle zero refcount net
Syzkaller hit a warning: refcount_t: addition on 0; use-after-free. WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 7890 at lib/refcount.c:25 refcount_warn_saturate+0xdf/0x1d0 Modules linked in: CPU: 3 PID: 7890 Comm: tun Not tainted 6.10.0-rc3-00100-gcaa4f9578aba-dirty #310 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:refcount_warn_saturate+0xdf/0x1d0 Code: 41 49 04 31 ff 89 de e8 9f 1e cd fe 84 db 75 9c e8 76 26 cd fe c6 05 b6 41 49 04 01 90 48 c7 c7 b8 8e 25 86 e8 d2 05 b5 fe 90 <0f> 0b 90 90 e9 79 ff ff ff e8 53 26 cd fe 0f b6 1 RSP: 0018:ffff8881067b7da0 EFLAGS: 00010286 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffffffff811c72ac RDX: ffff8881026a2140 RSI: ffffffff811c72b5 RDI: 0000000000000001 RBP: ffff8881067b7db0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 205b5d3730353139 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 205d303938375420 R12: ffff8881086500c4 R13: ffff8881086500c4 R14: ffff8881086500b0 R15: ffff888108650040 FS: 00007f5b2961a4c0(0000) GS:ffff88823bd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 000055d7ed36fd18 CR3: 00000001482f6000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> ? show_regs+0xa3/0xc0 ? __warn+0xa5/0x1c0 ? refcount_warn_saturate+0xdf/0x1d0 ? report_bug+0x1fc/0x2d0 ? refcount_warn_saturate+0xdf/0x1d0 ? handle_bug+0xa1/0x110 ? exc_invalid_op+0x3c/0xb0 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1f/0x30 ? __warn_printk+0xcc/0x140 ? __warn_printk+0xd5/0x140 ? refcount_warn_saturate+0xdf/0x1d0 get_net_ns+0xa4/0xc0 ? __pfx_get_net_ns+0x10/0x10 open_related_ns+0x5a/0x130 __tun_chr_ioctl+0x1616/0x2370 ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_switch+0x58/0xa0 ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp2+0x1c/0x30 ? __pfx_tun_chr_ioctl+0x10/0x10 tun_chr_ioctl+0x2f/0x40 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x11b/0x160 x64_sys_call+0x1211/0x20d0 do_syscall_64+0x9e/0x1d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7f5b28f165d7 Code: b3 66 90 48 8b 05 b1 48 2d 00 64 c7 00 26 00 00 00 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 81 48 2d 00 8 RSP: 002b:00007ffc2b59c5e8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f5b28f165d7 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000000054e3 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00007ffc2b59c650 R08: 00007f5b291ed8c0 R09: 00007f5b2961a4c0 R10: 0000000029690010 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000400730 R13: 00007ffc2b59cf40 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 </TASK> Kernel panic - not syncing: kernel: panic_on_warn set ...
This is trigger as below: ns0 ns1 tun_set_iff() //dev is tun0 tun->dev = dev //ip link set tun0 netns ns1 put_net() //ref is 0 __tun_chr_ioctl() //TUNGETDEVNETNS net = dev_net(tun->dev); open_related_ns(&net->ns, get_net_ns); //ns1 get_net_ns() get_net() //addition on 0
Use maybe_get_net() in get_net_ns in case net's ref is zero to fix this(CVE-2024-40958)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: qla2xxx: During vport delete send async logout explicitly
During vport delete, it is observed that during unload we hit a crash because of stale entries in outstanding command array. For all these stale I/O entries, eh_abort was issued and aborted (fast_fail_io = 2009h) but I/Os could not complete while vport delete is in process of deleting.
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 000000000000001c #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI Workqueue: qla2xxx_wq qla_do_work [qla2xxx] RIP: 0010:dma_direct_unmap_sg+0x51/0x1e0 RSP: 0018:ffffa1e1e150fc68 EFLAGS: 00010046 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000021 RCX: 0000000000000001 RDX: 0000000000000021 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff8ce208a7a0d0 RBP: ffff8ce208a7a0d0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff8ce378aac9c8 R10: ffff8ce378aac8a0 R11: ffffa1e1e150f9d8 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff8ce378aac9c8 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8d217f000000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 000000000000001c CR3: 0000002089acc000 CR4: 0000000000350ee0 Call Trace: <TASK> qla2xxx_qpair_sp_free_dma+0x417/0x4e0 ? qla2xxx_qpair_sp_compl+0x10d/0x1a0 ? qla2x00_status_entry+0x768/0x2830 ? newidle_balance+0x2f0/0x430 ? dequeue_entity+0x100/0x3c0 ? qla24xx_process_response_queue+0x6a1/0x19e0 ? __schedule+0x2d5/0x1140 ? qla_do_work+0x47/0x60 ? process_one_work+0x267/0x440 ? process_one_work+0x440/0x440 ? worker_thread+0x2d/0x3d0 ? process_one_work+0x440/0x440 ? kthread+0x156/0x180 ? set_kthread_struct+0x50/0x50 ? ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 </TASK>
Send out async logout explicitly for all the ports during vport delete.(CVE-2024-42289)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: flow_dissector: use DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE
The following splat is easy to reproduce upstream as well as in -stable kernels. Florian Westphal provided the following commit:
d1dab4f71d37 ("net: add and use __skb_get_hash_symmetric_net")
but this complementary fix has been also suggested by Willem de Bruijn and it can be easily backported to -stable kernel which consists in using DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE instead to silence the following splat given __skb_get_hash() is used by the nftables tracing infrastructure to to identify packets in traces.
[69133.561393] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [69133.561404] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 43576 at net/core/flow_dissector.c:1104 __skb_flow_dissect+0x134f/ [...] [69133.561944] CPU: 0 PID: 43576 Comm: socat Not tainted 6.10.0-rc7+ #379 [69133.561959] RIP: 0010:__skb_flow_dissect+0x134f/0x2ad0 [69133.561970] Code: 83 f9 04 0f 84 b3 00 00 00 45 85 c9 0f 84 aa 00 00 00 41 83 f9 02 0f 84 81 fc ff ff 44 0f b7 b4 24 80 00 00 00 e9 8b f9 ff ff <0f> 0b e9 20 f3 ff ff 41 f6 c6 20 0f 84 e4 ef ff ff 48 8d 7b 12 e8 [69133.561979] RSP: 0018:ffffc90000006fc0 EFLAGS: 00010246 [69133.561988] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffff82f33e20 RCX: ffffffff81ab7e19 [69133.561994] RDX: dffffc0000000000 RSI: ffffc90000007388 RDI: ffff888103a1b418 [69133.562001] RBP: ffffc90000007310 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [69133.562007] R10: ffffc90000007388 R11: ffffffff810cface R12: ffff888103a1b400 [69133.562013] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffffffff82f33e2a R15: ffffffff82f33e28 [69133.562020] FS: 00007f40f7131740(0000) GS:ffff888390800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [69133.562027] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [69133.562033] CR2: 00007f40f7346ee0 CR3: 000000015d200001 CR4: 00000000001706f0 [69133.562040] Call Trace: [69133.562044] <IRQ> [69133.562049] ? __warn+0x9f/0x1a0 [ 1211.841384] ? __skb_flow_dissect+0x107e/0x2860 [...] [ 1211.841496] ? bpf_flow_dissect+0x160/0x160 [ 1211.841753] __skb_get_hash+0x97/0x280 [ 1211.841765] ? __skb_get_hash_symmetric+0x230/0x230 [ 1211.841776] ? mod_find+0xbf/0xe0 [ 1211.841786] ? get_stack_info_noinstr+0x12/0xe0 [ 1211.841798] ? bpf_ksym_find+0x56/0xe0 [ 1211.841807] ? __rcu_read_unlock+0x2a/0x70 [ 1211.841819] nft_trace_init+0x1b9/0x1c0 [nf_tables] [ 1211.841895] ? nft_trace_notify+0x830/0x830 [nf_tables] [ 1211.841964] ? get_stack_info+0x2b/0x80 [ 1211.841975] ? nft_do_chain_arp+0x80/0x80 [nf_tables] [ 1211.842044] nft_do_chain+0x79c/0x850 nf_tables
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mlxsw: spectrum_acl_erp: Fix object nesting warning
ACLs in Spectrum-2 and newer ASICs can reside in the algorithmic TCAM (A-TCAM) or in the ordinary circuit TCAM (C-TCAM). The former can contain more ACLs (i.e., tc filters), but the number of masks in each region (i.e., tc chain) is limited.
In order to mitigate the effects of the above limitation, the device allows filters to share a single mask if their masks only differ in up to 8 consecutive bits. For example, dst_ip/25 can be represented using dst_ip/24 with a delta of 1 bit. The C-TCAM does not have a limit on the number of masks being used (and therefore does not support mask aggregation), but can contain a limited number of filters.
The driver uses the "objagg" library to perform the mask aggregation by passing it objects that consist of the filter's mask and whether the filter is to be inserted into the A-TCAM or the C-TCAM since filters in different TCAMs cannot share a mask.
The set of created objects is dependent on the insertion order of the filters and is not necessarily optimal. Therefore, the driver will periodically ask the library to compute a more optimal set ("hints") by looking at all the existing objects.
When the library asks the driver whether two objects can be aggregated the driver only compares the provided masks and ignores the A-TCAM / C-TCAM indication. This is the right thing to do since the goal is to move as many filters as possible to the A-TCAM. The driver also forbids two identical masks from being aggregated since this can only happen if one was intentionally put in the C-TCAM to avoid a conflict in the A-TCAM.
The above can result in the following set of hints:
H1: {mask X, A-TCAM} -> H2: {mask Y, A-TCAM} // X is Y + delta H3: {mask Y, C-TCAM} -> H4: {mask Z, A-TCAM} // Y is Z + delta
After getting the hints from the library the driver will start migrating filters from one region to another while consulting the computed hints and instructing the device to perform a lookup in both regions during the transition.
Assuming a filter with mask X is being migrated into the A-TCAM in the new region, the hints lookup will return H1. Since H2 is the parent of H1, the library will try to find the object associated with it and create it if necessary in which case another hints lookup (recursive) will be performed. This hints lookup for {mask Y, A-TCAM} will either return H2 or H3 since the driver passes the library an object comparison function that ignores the A-TCAM / C-TCAM indication.
This can eventually lead to nested objects which are not supported by the library [1].
Fix by removing the object comparison function from both the driver and the library as the driver was the only user. That way the lookup will only return exact matches.
I do not have a reliable reproducer that can reproduce the issue in a timely manner, but before the fix the issue would reproduce in several minutes and with the fix it does not reproduce in over an hour.
Note that the current usefulness of the hints is limited because they include the C-TCAM indication and represent aggregation that cannot actually happen. This will be addressed in net-next.
[1] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 153 at lib/objagg.c:170 objagg_obj_parent_assign+0xb5/0xd0 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 153 Comm: kworker/0:18 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc6-custom-g70fbc2c1c38b #42 Hardware name: Mellanox Technologies Ltd. MSN3700C/VMOD0008, BIOS 5.11 10/10/2018 Workqueue: mlxsw_core mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work RIP: 0010:objagg_obj_parent_assign+0xb5/0xd0 [...] Call Trace: <TASK> __objagg_obj_get+0x2bb/0x580 objagg_obj_get+0xe/0x80 mlxsw_sp_acl_erp_mask_get+0xb5/0xf0 mlxsw_sp_acl_atcam_entry_add+0xe8/0x3c0 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_entry_create+0x5e/0xa0 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vchunk_migrate_one+0x16b/0x270 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work+0xbe/0x510 process_one_work+0x151/0x370(CVE-2024-43880)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
gpio: prevent potential speculation leaks in gpio_device_get_desc()
Userspace may trigger a speculative read of an address outside the gpio descriptor array. Users can do that by calling gpio_ioctl() with an offset out of range. Offset is copied from user and then used as an array index to get the gpio descriptor without sanitization in gpio_device_get_desc().
This change ensures that the offset is sanitized by using array_index_nospec() to mitigate any possibility of speculative information leaks.
This bug was discovered and resolved using Coverity Static Analysis Security Testing (SAST) by Synopsys, Inc.(CVE-2024-44931)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
driver core: Fix uevent_show() vs driver detach race
uevent_show() wants to de-reference dev->driver->name. There is no clean way for a device attribute to de-reference dev->driver unless that attribute is defined via (struct device_driver).dev_groups. Instead, the anti-pattern of taking the device_lock() in the attribute handler risks deadlocks with code paths that remove device attributes while holding the lock.
This deadlock is typically invisible to lockdep given the device_lock() is marked lockdep_set_novalidate_class(), but some subsystems allocate a local lockdep key for @dev->mutex to reveal reports of the form:
====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.10.0-rc7+ #275 Tainted: G OE N
modprobe/2374 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8c2270070de0 (kn->active#6){++++}-{0:0}, at: __kernfs_remove+0xde/0x220
but task is already holding lock: ffff8c22016e88f8 (&cxl_root_key){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x39/0x210
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (&cxl_root_key){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x99/0xc30 uevent_show+0xac/0x130 dev_attr_show+0x18/0x40 sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xac/0xf0 seq_read_iter+0x110/0x450 vfs_read+0x25b/0x340 ksys_read+0x67/0xf0 do_syscall_64+0x75/0x190 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
-> #0 (kn->active#6){++++}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x121a/0x1fa0 lock_acquire+0xd6/0x2e0 kernfs_drain+0x1e9/0x200 __kernfs_remove+0xde/0x220 kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x5e/0xa0 device_del+0x168/0x410 device_unregister+0x13/0x60 devres_release_all+0xb8/0x110 device_unbind_cleanup+0xe/0x70 device_release_driver_internal+0x1c7/0x210 driver_detach+0x47/0x90 bus_remove_driver+0x6c/0xf0 cxl_acpi_exit+0xc/0x11 [cxl_acpi] __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x181/0x260 do_syscall_64+0x75/0x190 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
The observation though is that driver objects are typically much longer lived than device objects. It is reasonable to perform lockless de-reference of a @driver pointer even if it is racing detach from a device. Given the infrequency of driver unregistration, use synchronize_rcu() in module_remove_driver() to close any potential races. It is potentially overkill to suffer synchronize_rcu() just to handle the rare module removal racing uevent_show() event.
Thanks to Tetsuo Handa for the debug analysis of the syzbot report [1].(CVE-2024-44952)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bonding: fix xfrm real_dev null pointer dereference
We shouldn't set real_dev to NULL because packets can be in transit and xfrm might call xdo_dev_offload_ok() in parallel. All callbacks assume real_dev is set.
Example trace: kernel: BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 0000000000001030 kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): making interface the new active one kernel: #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode kernel: #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page kernel: PGD 0 P4D 0 kernel: Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT SMP kernel: CPU: 4 PID: 2237 Comm: ping Not tainted 6.7.7+ #12 kernel: Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-2.fc40 04/01/2014 kernel: RIP: 0010:nsim_ipsec_offload_ok+0xc/0x20 [netdevsim] kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): bond_ipsec_add_sa_all: failed to add SA kernel: Code: e0 0f 0b 48 83 7f 38 00 74 de 0f 0b 48 8b 47 08 48 8b 37 48 8b 78 40 e9 b2 e5 9a d7 66 90 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 8b 86 80 02 00 00 <83> 80 30 10 00 00 01 b8 01 00 00 00 c3 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 0f 1f kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): making interface the new active one kernel: RSP: 0018:ffffabde81553b98 EFLAGS: 00010246 kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): bond_ipsec_add_sa_all: failed to add SA kernel: kernel: RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff9eb404e74900 RCX: ffff9eb403d97c60 kernel: RDX: ffffffffc090de10 RSI: ffff9eb404e74900 RDI: ffff9eb3c5de9e00 kernel: RBP: ffff9eb3c0a42000 R08: 0000000000000010 R09: 0000000000000014 kernel: R10: 7974203030303030 R11: 3030303030303030 R12: 0000000000000000 kernel: R13: ffff9eb3c5de9e00 R14: ffffabde81553cc8 R15: ffff9eb404c53000 kernel: FS: 00007f2a77a3ad00(0000) GS:ffff9eb43bd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 kernel: CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 kernel: CR2: 0000000000001030 CR3: 00000001122ab000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0 kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): making interface the new active one kernel: Call Trace: kernel: <TASK> kernel: ? __die+0x1f/0x60 kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): bond_ipsec_add_sa_all: failed to add SA kernel: ? page_fault_oops+0x142/0x4c0 kernel: ? do_user_addr_fault+0x65/0x670 kernel: ? kvm_read_and_reset_apf_flags+0x3b/0x50 kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): making interface the new active one kernel: ? exc_page_fault+0x7b/0x180 kernel: ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30 kernel: ? nsim_bpf_uninit+0x50/0x50 [netdevsim] kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): bond_ipsec_add_sa_all: failed to add SA kernel: ? nsim_ipsec_offload_ok+0xc/0x20 [netdevsim] kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): making interface the new active one kernel: bond_ipsec_offload_ok+0x7b/0x90 [bonding] kernel: xfrm_output+0x61/0x3b0 kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): bond_ipsec_add_sa_all: failed to add SA kernel: ip_push_pending_frames+0x56/0x80(CVE-2024-44989)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bonding: fix null pointer deref in bond_ipsec_offload_ok
We must check if there is an active slave before dereferencing the pointer.(CVE-2024-44990)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: flowtable: initialise extack before use
Fix missing initialisation of extack in flow offload.(CVE-2024-45018)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
dmaengine: altera-msgdma: properly free descriptor in msgdma_free_descriptor
Remove list_del call in msgdma_chan_desc_cleanup, this should be the role of msgdma_free_descriptor. In consequence replace list_add_tail with list_move_tail in msgdma_free_descriptor.
This fixes the path: msgdma_free_chan_resources -> msgdma_free_descriptors -> msgdma_free_desc_list -> msgdma_free_descriptor
which does not correctly free the descriptors as first nodes were not removed from the list.(CVE-2024-46716)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: Stop amdgpu_dm initialize when stream nums greater than 6
[Why] Coverity reports OVERRUN warning. Should abort amdgpu_dm initialize.
[How] Return failure to amdgpu_dm_init.(CVE-2024-46817)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
arm64: acpi: Harden get_cpu_for_acpi_id() against missing CPU entry
In a review discussion of the changes to support vCPU hotplug where a check was added on the GICC being enabled if was online, it was noted that there is need to map back to the cpu and use that to index into a cpumask. As such, a valid ID is needed.
If an MPIDR check fails in acpi_map_gic_cpu_interface() it is possible for the entry in cpu_madt_gicc[cpu] == NULL. This function would then cause a NULL pointer dereference. Whilst a path to trigger this has not been established, harden this caller against the possibility.(CVE-2024-46822)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ELF: fix kernel.randomize_va_space double read
ELF loader uses "randomize_va_space" twice. It is sysctl and can change at any moment, so 2 loads could see 2 different values in theory with unpredictable consequences.
Issue exactly one load for consistent value across one exec.(CVE-2024-46826)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
platform/x86: panasonic-laptop: Fix SINF array out of bounds accesses
The panasonic laptop code in various places uses the SINF array with index values of 0 - SINF_CUR_BRIGHT(0x0d) without checking that the SINF array is big enough.
Not all panasonic laptops have this many SINF array entries, for example the Toughbook CF-18 model only has 10 SINF array entries. So it only supports the AC+DC brightness entries and mute.
Check that the SINF array has a minimum size which covers all AC+DC brightness entries and refuse to load if the SINF array is smaller.
For higher SINF indexes hide the sysfs attributes when the SINF array does not contain an entry for that attribute, avoiding show()/store() accessing the array out of bounds and add bounds checking to the probe() and resume() code accessing these.(CVE-2024-46859)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: Avoid overflow from uint32_t to uint8_t
[WHAT & HOW] dmub_rb_cmd's ramping_boundary has size of uint8_t and it is assigned 0xFFFF. Fix it by changing it to uint8_t with value of 0xFF.
This fixes 2 INTEGER_OVERFLOW issues reported by Coverity.(CVE-2024-47661)
| URL | Type | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"kernel-5.10.0-136.98.0.179.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.98.0.179.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-136.98.0.179.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-136.98.0.179.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-136.98.0.179.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-136.98.0.179.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-136.98.0.179.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.98.0.179.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-136.98.0.179.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-136.98.0.179.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.98.0.179.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-136.98.0.179.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.98.0.179.oe2203sp1.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-5.10.0-136.98.0.179.oe2203sp1.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"kernel-5.10.0-136.98.0.179.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.98.0.179.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-136.98.0.179.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-136.98.0.179.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-136.98.0.179.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-136.98.0.179.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-136.98.0.179.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.98.0.179.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-136.98.0.179.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-136.98.0.179.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.98.0.179.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-136.98.0.179.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-136.98.0.179.oe2203sp1.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP1",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.10.0-136.98.0.179.oe2203sp1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "Critical"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nocteontx2-af: Fix possible null pointer dereference.\r\n\r\nThis patch fixes possible null pointer dereference in files\n\u0026quot;rvu_debugfs.c\u0026quot; and \u0026quot;rvu_nix.c\u0026quot;(CVE-2021-47484)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ntcp: do not accept ACK of bytes we never sent\r\n\r\nThis patch is based on a detailed report and ideas from Yepeng Pan\nand Christian Rossow.\r\n\r\nACK seq validation is currently following RFC 5961 5.2 guidelines:\r\n\r\n The ACK value is considered acceptable only if\n it is in the range of ((SND.UNA - MAX.SND.WND) \u0026lt;= SEG.ACK \u0026lt;=\n SND.NXT). All incoming segments whose ACK value doesn\u0026apos;t satisfy the\n above condition MUST be discarded and an ACK sent back. It needs to\n be noted that RFC 793 on page 72 (fifth check) says: \u0026quot;If the ACK is a\n duplicate (SEG.ACK \u0026lt; SND.UNA), it can be ignored. If the ACK\n acknowledges something not yet sent (SEG.ACK \u0026gt; SND.NXT) then send an\n ACK, drop the segment, and return\u0026quot;. The \u0026quot;ignored\u0026quot; above implies that\n the processing of the incoming data segment continues, which means\n the ACK value is treated as acceptable. This mitigation makes the\n ACK check more stringent since any ACK \u0026lt; SND.UNA wouldn\u0026apos;t be\n accepted, instead only ACKs that are in the range ((SND.UNA -\n MAX.SND.WND) \u0026lt;= SEG.ACK \u0026lt;= SND.NXT) get through.\r\n\r\nThis can be refined for new (and possibly spoofed) flows,\nby not accepting ACK for bytes that were never sent.\r\n\r\nThis greatly improves TCP security at a little cost.\r\n\r\nI added a Fixes: tag to make sure this patch will reach stable trees,\neven if the \u0026apos;blamed\u0026apos; patch was adhering to the RFC.\r\n\r\ntp-\u0026gt;bytes_acked was added in linux-4.2\r\n\r\nFollowing packetdrill test (courtesy of Yepeng Pan) shows\nthe issue at hand:\r\n\r\n0 socket(..., SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP) = 3\n+0 setsockopt(3, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, [1], 4) = 0\n+0 bind(3, ..., ...) = 0\n+0 listen(3, 1024) = 0\r\n\r\n// ---------------- Handshake ------------------- //\r\n\r\n// when window scale is set to 14 the window size can be extended to\n// 65535 * (2^14) = 1073725440. Linux would accept an ACK packet\n// with ack number in (Server_ISN+1-1073725440. Server_ISN+1)\n// ,though this ack number acknowledges some data never\n// sent by the server.\r\n\r\n+0 \u0026lt; S 0:0(0) win 65535 \u0026lt;mss 1400,nop,wscale 14\u0026gt;\n+0 \u0026gt; S. 0:0(0) ack 1 \u0026lt;...\u0026gt;\n+0 \u0026lt; . 1:1(0) ack 1 win 65535\n+0 accept(3, ..., ...) = 4\r\n\r\n// For the established connection, we send an ACK packet,\n// the ack packet uses ack number 1 - 1073725300 + 2^32,\n// where 2^32 is used to wrap around.\n// Note: we used 1073725300 instead of 1073725440 to avoid possible\n// edge cases.\n// 1 - 1073725300 + 2^32 = 3221241997\r\n\r\n// Oops, old kernels happily accept this packet.\n+0 \u0026lt; . 1:1001(1000) ack 3221241997 win 65535\r\n\r\n// After the kernel fix the following will be replaced by a challenge ACK,\n// and prior malicious frame would be dropped.\n+0 \u0026gt; . 1:1(0) ack 1001(CVE-2023-52881)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nocteontx2-af: Use separate handlers for interrupts\r\n\r\nFor PF to AF interrupt vector and VF to AF vector same\ninterrupt handler is registered which is causing race condition.\nWhen two interrupts are raised to two CPUs at same time\nthen two cores serve same event corrupting the data.(CVE-2024-27030)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmedia: go7007: fix a memleak in go7007_load_encoder\r\n\r\nIn go7007_load_encoder, bounce(i.e. go-\u0026gt;boot_fw), is allocated without\na deallocation thereafter. After the following call chain:\r\n\r\nsaa7134_go7007_init\n |-\u0026gt; go7007_boot_encoder\n |-\u0026gt; go7007_load_encoder\n |-\u0026gt; kfree(go)\r\n\r\ngo is freed and thus bounce is leaked.(CVE-2024-27074)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnetfilter: nft_flow_offload: reset dst in route object after setting up flow\r\n\r\ndst is transferred to the flow object, route object does not own it\nanymore. Reset dst in route object, otherwise if flow_offload_add()\nfails, error path releases dst twice, leading to a refcount underflow.(CVE-2024-27403)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nwifi: mac80211: check/clear fast rx for non-4addr sta VLAN changes\r\n\r\nWhen moving a station out of a VLAN and deleting the VLAN afterwards, the\nfast_rx entry still holds a pointer to the VLAN\u0026apos;s netdev, which can cause\nuse-after-free bugs. Fix this by immediately calling ieee80211_check_fast_rx\nafter the VLAN change.(CVE-2024-35789)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/lima: fix a memleak in lima_heap_alloc\r\n\r\nWhen lima_vm_map_bo fails, the resources need to be deallocated, or\nthere will be memleaks.(CVE-2024-35829)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nriscv: process: Fix kernel gp leakage\r\n\r\nchildregs represents the registers which are active for the new thread\nin user context. For a kernel thread, childregs-\u0026gt;gp is never used since\nthe kernel gp is not touched by switch_to. For a user mode helper, the\ngp value can be observed in user space after execve or possibly by other\nmeans.\r\n\r\n[From the email thread]\r\n\r\nThe /* Kernel thread */ comment is somewhat inaccurate in that it is also used\nfor user_mode_helper threads, which exec a user process, e.g. /sbin/init or\nwhen /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern is a pipe. Such threads do not have\nPF_KTHREAD set and are valid targets for ptrace etc. even before they exec.\r\n\r\nchildregs is the *user* context during syscall execution and it is observable\nfrom userspace in at least five ways:\r\n\r\n1. kernel_execve does not currently clear integer registers, so the starting\n register state for PID 1 and other user processes started by the kernel has\n sp = user stack, gp = kernel __global_pointer$, all other integer registers\n zeroed by the memset in the patch comment.\r\n\r\n This is a bug in its own right, but I\u0026apos;m unwilling to bet that it is the only\n way to exploit the issue addressed by this patch.\r\n\r\n2. ptrace(PTRACE_GETREGSET): you can PTRACE_ATTACH to a user_mode_helper thread\n before it execs, but ptrace requires SIGSTOP to be delivered which can only\n happen at user/kernel boundaries.\r\n\r\n3. /proc/*/task/*/syscall: this is perfectly happy to read pt_regs for\n user_mode_helpers before the exec completes, but gp is not one of the\n registers it returns.\r\n\r\n4. PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_USER: LOCKDOWN_PERF normally prevents access to kernel\n addresses via PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR, but due to this bug kernel addresses\n are also exposed via PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_USER which is permitted under\n LOCKDOWN_PERF. I have not attempted to write exploit code.\r\n\r\n5. Much of the tracing infrastructure allows access to user registers. I have\n not attempted to determine which forms of tracing allow access to user\n registers without already allowing access to kernel registers.(CVE-2024-35871)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ni40e: Do not use WQ_MEM_RECLAIM flag for workqueue\r\n\r\nIssue reported by customer during SRIOV testing, call trace:\nWhen both i40e and the i40iw driver are loaded, a warning\nin check_flush_dependency is being triggered. This seems\nto be because of the i40e driver workqueue is allocated with\nthe WQ_MEM_RECLAIM flag, and the i40iw one is not.\r\n\r\nSimilar error was encountered on ice too and it was fixed by\nremoving the flag. Do the same for i40e too.\r\n\r\n[Feb 9 09:08] ------------[ cut here ]------------\n[ +0.000004] workqueue: WQ_MEM_RECLAIM i40e:i40e_service_task [i40e] is\nflushing !WQ_MEM_RECLAIM infiniband:0x0\n[ +0.000060] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 937 at kernel/workqueue.c:2966\ncheck_flush_dependency+0x10b/0x120\n[ +0.000007] Modules linked in: snd_seq_dummy snd_hrtimer snd_seq\nsnd_timer snd_seq_device snd soundcore nls_utf8 cifs cifs_arc4\nnls_ucs2_utils rdma_cm iw_cm ib_cm cifs_md4 dns_resolver netfs qrtr\nrfkill sunrpc vfat fat intel_rapl_msr intel_rapl_common irdma\nintel_uncore_frequency intel_uncore_frequency_common ice ipmi_ssif\nisst_if_common skx_edac nfit libnvdimm x86_pkg_temp_thermal\nintel_powerclamp gnss coretemp ib_uverbs rapl intel_cstate ib_core\niTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support acpi_ipmi mei_me ipmi_si intel_uncore\nioatdma i2c_i801 joydev pcspkr mei ipmi_devintf lpc_ich\nintel_pch_thermal i2c_smbus ipmi_msghandler acpi_power_meter acpi_pad\nxfs libcrc32c ast sd_mod drm_shmem_helper t10_pi drm_kms_helper sg ixgbe\ndrm i40e ahci crct10dif_pclmul libahci crc32_pclmul igb crc32c_intel\nlibata ghash_clmulni_intel i2c_algo_bit mdio dca wmi dm_mirror\ndm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod fuse\n[ +0.000050] CPU: 0 PID: 937 Comm: kworker/0:3 Kdump: loaded Not\ntainted 6.8.0-rc2-Feb-net_dev-Qiueue-00279-gbd43c5687e05 #1\n[ +0.000003] Hardware name: Intel Corporation S2600BPB/S2600BPB, BIOS\nSE5C620.86B.02.01.0013.121520200651 12/15/2020\n[ +0.000001] Workqueue: i40e i40e_service_task [i40e]\n[ +0.000024] RIP: 0010:check_flush_dependency+0x10b/0x120\n[ +0.000003] Code: ff 49 8b 54 24 18 48 8d 8b b0 00 00 00 49 89 e8 48\n81 c6 b0 00 00 00 48 c7 c7 b0 97 fa 9f c6 05 8a cc 1f 02 01 e8 35 b3 fd\nff \u0026lt;0f\u0026gt; 0b e9 10 ff ff ff 80 3d 78 cc 1f 02 00 75 94 e9 46 ff ff ff 90\n[ +0.000002] RSP: 0018:ffffbd294976bcf8 EFLAGS: 00010282\n[ +0.000002] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff94d4c483c000 RCX:\n0000000000000027\n[ +0.000001] RDX: ffff94d47f620bc8 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI:\nffff94d47f620bc0\n[ +0.000001] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09:\n00000000ffff7fff\n[ +0.000001] R10: ffffbd294976bb98 R11: ffffffffa0be65e8 R12:\nffff94c5451ea180\n[ +0.000001] R13: ffff94c5ab5e8000 R14: ffff94c5c20b6e05 R15:\nffff94c5f1330ab0\n[ +0.000001] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff94d47f600000(0000)\nknlGS:0000000000000000\n[ +0.000002] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n[ +0.000001] CR2: 00007f9e6f1fca70 CR3: 0000000038e20004 CR4:\n00000000007706f0\n[ +0.000000] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2:\n0000000000000000\n[ +0.000001] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7:\n0000000000000400\n[ +0.000001] PKRU: 55555554\n[ +0.000001] Call Trace:\n[ +0.000001] \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n[ +0.000002] ? __warn+0x80/0x130\n[ +0.000003] ? check_flush_dependency+0x10b/0x120\n[ +0.000002] ? report_bug+0x195/0x1a0\n[ +0.000005] ? handle_bug+0x3c/0x70\n[ +0.000003] ? exc_invalid_op+0x14/0x70\n[ +0.000002] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20\n[ +0.000006] ? check_flush_dependency+0x10b/0x120\n[ +0.000002] ? check_flush_dependency+0x10b/0x120\n[ +0.000002] __flush_workqueue+0x126/0x3f0\n[ +0.000015] ib_cache_cleanup_one+0x1c/0xe0 [ib_core]\n[ +0.000056] __ib_unregister_device+0x6a/0xb0 [ib_core]\n[ +0.000023] ib_unregister_device_and_put+0x34/0x50 [ib_core]\n[ +0.000020] i40iw_close+0x4b/0x90 [irdma]\n[ +0.000022] i40e_notify_client_of_netdev_close+0x54/0xc0 [i40e]\n[ +0.000035] i40e_service_task+0x126/0x190 [i40e]\n[ +0.000024] process_one_work+0x174/0x340\n[ +0.000003] worker_th\n---truncated---(CVE-2024-36004)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmlxsw: spectrum_acl_tcam: Fix warning during rehash\r\n\r\nAs previously explained, the rehash delayed work migrates filters from\none region to another. This is done by iterating over all chunks (all\nthe filters with the same priority) in the region and in each chunk\niterating over all the filters.\r\n\r\nWhen the work runs out of credits it stores the current chunk and entry\nas markers in the per-work context so that it would know where to resume\nthe migration from the next time the work is scheduled.\r\n\r\nUpon error, the chunk marker is reset to NULL, but without resetting the\nentry markers despite being relative to it. This can result in migration\nbeing resumed from an entry that does not belong to the chunk being\nmigrated. In turn, this will eventually lead to a chunk being iterated\nover as if it is an entry. Because of how the two structures happen to\nbe defined, this does not lead to KASAN splats, but to warnings such as\n[1].\r\n\r\nFix by creating a helper that resets all the markers and call it from\nall the places the currently only reset the chunk marker. For good\nmeasures also call it when starting a completely new rehash. Add a\nwarning to avoid future cases.\r\n\r\n[1]\nWARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 1076 at drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/core_acl_flex_keys.c:407 mlxsw_afk_encode+0x242/0x2f0\nModules linked in:\nCPU: 7 PID: 1076 Comm: kworker/7:24 Tainted: G W 6.9.0-rc3-custom-00880-g29e61d91b77b #29\nHardware name: Mellanox Technologies Ltd. MSN3700/VMOD0005, BIOS 5.11 01/06/2019\nWorkqueue: mlxsw_core mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work\nRIP: 0010:mlxsw_afk_encode+0x242/0x2f0\n[...]\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n mlxsw_sp_acl_atcam_entry_add+0xd9/0x3c0\n mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_entry_create+0x5e/0xa0\n mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vchunk_migrate_all+0x109/0x290\n mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work+0x6c/0x470\n process_one_work+0x151/0x370\n worker_thread+0x2cb/0x3e0\n kthread+0xd0/0x100\n ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;(CVE-2024-36007)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet/sched: taprio: extend minimum interval restriction to entire cycle too\r\n\r\nIt is possible for syzbot to side-step the restriction imposed by the\nblamed commit in the Fixes: tag, because the taprio UAPI permits a\ncycle-time different from (and potentially shorter than) the sum of\nentry intervals.\r\n\r\nWe need one more restriction, which is that the cycle time itself must\nbe larger than N * ETH_ZLEN bit times, where N is the number of schedule\nentries. This restriction needs to apply regardless of whether the cycle\ntime came from the user or was the implicit, auto-calculated value, so\nwe move the existing \u0026quot;cycle == 0\u0026quot; check outside the \u0026quot;if \u0026quot;(!new-\u0026gt;cycle_time)\u0026quot;\nbranch. This way covers both conditions and scenarios.\r\n\r\nAdd a selftest which illustrates the issue triggered by syzbot.(CVE-2024-36244)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet/mlx5e: Fix netif state handling\r\n\r\nmlx5e_suspend cleans resources only if netif_device_present() returns\ntrue. However, mlx5e_resume changes the state of netif, via\nmlx5e_nic_enable, only if reg_state == NETREG_REGISTERED.\nIn the below case, the above leads to NULL-ptr Oops[1] and memory\nleaks:\r\n\r\nmlx5e_probe\n _mlx5e_resume\n mlx5e_attach_netdev\n mlx5e_nic_enable \u0026lt;-- netdev not reg, not calling netif_device_attach()\n register_netdev \u0026lt;-- failed for some reason.\nERROR_FLOW:\n _mlx5e_suspend \u0026lt;-- netif_device_present return false, resources aren\u0026apos;t freed :(\r\n\r\nHence, clean resources in this case as well.\r\n\r\n[1]\nBUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000\nPGD 0 P4D 0\nOops: 0010 [#1] SMP\nCPU: 2 PID: 9345 Comm: test-ovs-ct-gen Not tainted 6.5.0_for_upstream_min_debug_2023_09_05_16_01 #1\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014\nRIP: 0010:0x0\nCode: Unable to access opcode bytes at0xffffffffffffffd6.\nRSP: 0018:ffff888178aaf758 EFLAGS: 00010246\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n ? __die+0x20/0x60\n ? page_fault_oops+0x14c/0x3c0\n ? exc_page_fault+0x75/0x140\n ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30\n notifier_call_chain+0x35/0xb0\n blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x3d/0x60\n mlx5_blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x22/0x30 [mlx5_core]\n mlx5_core_uplink_netdev_event_replay+0x3e/0x60 [mlx5_core]\n mlx5_mdev_netdev_track+0x53/0x60 [mlx5_ib]\n mlx5_ib_roce_init+0xc3/0x340 [mlx5_ib]\n __mlx5_ib_add+0x34/0xd0 [mlx5_ib]\n mlx5r_probe+0xe1/0x210 [mlx5_ib]\n ? auxiliary_match_id+0x6a/0x90\n auxiliary_bus_probe+0x38/0x80\n ? driver_sysfs_add+0x51/0x80\n really_probe+0xc9/0x3e0\n ? driver_probe_device+0x90/0x90\n __driver_probe_device+0x80/0x160\n driver_probe_device+0x1e/0x90\n __device_attach_driver+0x7d/0x100\n bus_for_each_drv+0x80/0xd0\n __device_attach+0xbc/0x1f0\n bus_probe_device+0x86/0xa0\n device_add+0x637/0x840\n __auxiliary_device_add+0x3b/0xa0\n add_adev+0xc9/0x140 [mlx5_core]\n mlx5_rescan_drivers_locked+0x22a/0x310 [mlx5_core]\n mlx5_register_device+0x53/0xa0 [mlx5_core]\n mlx5_init_one_devl_locked+0x5c4/0x9c0 [mlx5_core]\n mlx5_init_one+0x3b/0x60 [mlx5_core]\n probe_one+0x44c/0x730 [mlx5_core]\n local_pci_probe+0x3e/0x90\n pci_device_probe+0xbf/0x210\n ? kernfs_create_link+0x5d/0xa0\n ? sysfs_do_create_link_sd+0x60/0xc0\n really_probe+0xc9/0x3e0\n ? driver_probe_device+0x90/0x90\n __driver_probe_device+0x80/0x160\n driver_probe_device+0x1e/0x90\n __device_attach_driver+0x7d/0x100\n bus_for_each_drv+0x80/0xd0\n __device_attach+0xbc/0x1f0\n pci_bus_add_device+0x54/0x80\n pci_iov_add_virtfn+0x2e6/0x320\n sriov_enable+0x208/0x420\n mlx5_core_sriov_configure+0x9e/0x200 [mlx5_core]\n sriov_numvfs_store+0xae/0x1a0\n kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x10c/0x1a0\n vfs_write+0x291/0x3c0\n ksys_write+0x5f/0xe0\n do_syscall_64+0x3d/0x90\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0\n CR2: 0000000000000000\n ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---(CVE-2024-38608)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nipv6: sr: fix invalid unregister error path\r\n\r\nThe error path of seg6_init() is wrong in case CONFIG_IPV6_SEG6_LWTUNNEL\nis not defined. In that case if seg6_hmac_init() fails, the\ngenl_unregister_family() isn\u0026apos;t called.\r\n\r\nThis issue exist since commit 46738b1317e1 (\u0026quot;ipv6: sr: add option to control\nlwtunnel support\u0026quot;), and commit 5559cea2d5aa (\u0026quot;ipv6: sr: fix possible\nuse-after-free and null-ptr-deref\u0026quot;) replaced unregister_pernet_subsys()\nwith genl_unregister_family() in this error path.(CVE-2024-38612)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ngreybus: Fix use-after-free bug in gb_interface_release due to race condition.\r\n\r\nIn gb_interface_create, \u0026amp;intf-\u0026gt;mode_switch_completion is bound with\ngb_interface_mode_switch_work. Then it will be started by\ngb_interface_request_mode_switch. Here is the relevant code.\nif (!queue_work(system_long_wq, \u0026amp;intf-\u0026gt;mode_switch_work)) {\n\t...\n}\r\n\r\nIf we call gb_interface_release to make cleanup, there may be an\nunfinished work. This function will call kfree to free the object\n\u0026quot;intf\u0026quot;. However, if gb_interface_mode_switch_work is scheduled to\nrun after kfree, it may cause use-after-free error as\ngb_interface_mode_switch_work will use the object \u0026quot;intf\u0026quot;.\nThe possible execution flow that may lead to the issue is as follows:\r\n\r\nCPU0 CPU1\r\n\r\n | gb_interface_create\n | gb_interface_request_mode_switch\ngb_interface_release |\nkfree(intf) (free) |\n | gb_interface_mode_switch_work\n | mutex_lock(\u0026amp;intf-\u0026gt;mutex) (use)\r\n\r\nFix it by canceling the work before kfree.(CVE-2024-39495)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnetns: Make get_net_ns() handle zero refcount net\r\n\r\nSyzkaller hit a warning:\nrefcount_t: addition on 0; use-after-free.\nWARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 7890 at lib/refcount.c:25 refcount_warn_saturate+0xdf/0x1d0\nModules linked in:\nCPU: 3 PID: 7890 Comm: tun Not tainted 6.10.0-rc3-00100-gcaa4f9578aba-dirty #310\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014\nRIP: 0010:refcount_warn_saturate+0xdf/0x1d0\nCode: 41 49 04 31 ff 89 de e8 9f 1e cd fe 84 db 75 9c e8 76 26 cd fe c6 05 b6 41 49 04 01 90 48 c7 c7 b8 8e 25 86 e8 d2 05 b5 fe 90 \u0026lt;0f\u0026gt; 0b 90 90 e9 79 ff ff ff e8 53 26 cd fe 0f b6 1\nRSP: 0018:ffff8881067b7da0 EFLAGS: 00010286\nRAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffffffff811c72ac\nRDX: ffff8881026a2140 RSI: ffffffff811c72b5 RDI: 0000000000000001\nRBP: ffff8881067b7db0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 205b5d3730353139\nR10: 0000000000000000 R11: 205d303938375420 R12: ffff8881086500c4\nR13: ffff8881086500c4 R14: ffff8881086500b0 R15: ffff888108650040\nFS: 00007f5b2961a4c0(0000) GS:ffff88823bd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: 000055d7ed36fd18 CR3: 00000001482f6000 CR4: 00000000000006f0\nDR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\nDR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n ? show_regs+0xa3/0xc0\n ? __warn+0xa5/0x1c0\n ? refcount_warn_saturate+0xdf/0x1d0\n ? report_bug+0x1fc/0x2d0\n ? refcount_warn_saturate+0xdf/0x1d0\n ? handle_bug+0xa1/0x110\n ? exc_invalid_op+0x3c/0xb0\n ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1f/0x30\n ? __warn_printk+0xcc/0x140\n ? __warn_printk+0xd5/0x140\n ? refcount_warn_saturate+0xdf/0x1d0\n get_net_ns+0xa4/0xc0\n ? __pfx_get_net_ns+0x10/0x10\n open_related_ns+0x5a/0x130\n __tun_chr_ioctl+0x1616/0x2370\n ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_switch+0x58/0xa0\n ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp2+0x1c/0x30\n ? __pfx_tun_chr_ioctl+0x10/0x10\n tun_chr_ioctl+0x2f/0x40\n __x64_sys_ioctl+0x11b/0x160\n x64_sys_call+0x1211/0x20d0\n do_syscall_64+0x9e/0x1d0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f\nRIP: 0033:0x7f5b28f165d7\nCode: b3 66 90 48 8b 05 b1 48 2d 00 64 c7 00 26 00 00 00 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 \u0026lt;48\u0026gt; 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 81 48 2d 00 8\nRSP: 002b:00007ffc2b59c5e8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010\nRAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f5b28f165d7\nRDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000000054e3 RDI: 0000000000000003\nRBP: 00007ffc2b59c650 R08: 00007f5b291ed8c0 R09: 00007f5b2961a4c0\nR10: 0000000029690010 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000400730\nR13: 00007ffc2b59cf40 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\nKernel panic - not syncing: kernel: panic_on_warn set ...\r\n\r\nThis is trigger as below:\n ns0 ns1\ntun_set_iff() //dev is tun0\n tun-\u0026gt;dev = dev\n//ip link set tun0 netns ns1\n put_net() //ref is 0\n__tun_chr_ioctl() //TUNGETDEVNETNS\n net = dev_net(tun-\u0026gt;dev);\n open_related_ns(\u0026amp;net-\u0026gt;ns, get_net_ns); //ns1\n get_net_ns()\n get_net() //addition on 0\r\n\r\nUse maybe_get_net() in get_net_ns in case net\u0026apos;s ref is zero to fix this(CVE-2024-40958)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nscsi: qla2xxx: During vport delete send async logout explicitly\r\n\r\nDuring vport delete, it is observed that during unload we hit a crash\nbecause of stale entries in outstanding command array. For all these stale\nI/O entries, eh_abort was issued and aborted (fast_fail_io = 2009h) but\nI/Os could not complete while vport delete is in process of deleting.\r\n\r\n BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 000000000000001c\n #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode\n #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page\n PGD 0 P4D 0\n Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI\n Workqueue: qla2xxx_wq qla_do_work [qla2xxx]\n RIP: 0010:dma_direct_unmap_sg+0x51/0x1e0\n RSP: 0018:ffffa1e1e150fc68 EFLAGS: 00010046\n RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000021 RCX: 0000000000000001\n RDX: 0000000000000021 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff8ce208a7a0d0\n RBP: ffff8ce208a7a0d0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff8ce378aac9c8\n R10: ffff8ce378aac8a0 R11: ffffa1e1e150f9d8 R12: 0000000000000000\n R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff8ce378aac9c8 R15: 0000000000000000\n FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8d217f000000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n CR2: 000000000000001c CR3: 0000002089acc000 CR4: 0000000000350ee0\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n qla2xxx_qpair_sp_free_dma+0x417/0x4e0\n ? qla2xxx_qpair_sp_compl+0x10d/0x1a0\n ? qla2x00_status_entry+0x768/0x2830\n ? newidle_balance+0x2f0/0x430\n ? dequeue_entity+0x100/0x3c0\n ? qla24xx_process_response_queue+0x6a1/0x19e0\n ? __schedule+0x2d5/0x1140\n ? qla_do_work+0x47/0x60\n ? process_one_work+0x267/0x440\n ? process_one_work+0x440/0x440\n ? worker_thread+0x2d/0x3d0\n ? process_one_work+0x440/0x440\n ? kthread+0x156/0x180\n ? set_kthread_struct+0x50/0x50\n ? ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30\n \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\r\n\r\nSend out async logout explicitly for all the ports during vport delete.(CVE-2024-42289)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnet: flow_dissector: use DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE\r\n\r\nThe following splat is easy to reproduce upstream as well as in -stable\nkernels. Florian Westphal provided the following commit:\r\n\r\n d1dab4f71d37 (\u0026quot;net: add and use __skb_get_hash_symmetric_net\u0026quot;)\r\n\r\nbut this complementary fix has been also suggested by Willem de Bruijn\nand it can be easily backported to -stable kernel which consists in\nusing DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE instead to silence the following splat\ngiven __skb_get_hash() is used by the nftables tracing infrastructure to\nto identify packets in traces.\r\n\r\n[69133.561393] ------------[ cut here ]------------\n[69133.561404] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 43576 at net/core/flow_dissector.c:1104 __skb_flow_dissect+0x134f/\n[...]\n[69133.561944] CPU: 0 PID: 43576 Comm: socat Not tainted 6.10.0-rc7+ #379\n[69133.561959] RIP: 0010:__skb_flow_dissect+0x134f/0x2ad0\n[69133.561970] Code: 83 f9 04 0f 84 b3 00 00 00 45 85 c9 0f 84 aa 00 00 00 41 83 f9 02 0f 84 81 fc ff\nff 44 0f b7 b4 24 80 00 00 00 e9 8b f9 ff ff \u0026lt;0f\u0026gt; 0b e9 20 f3 ff ff 41 f6 c6 20 0f 84 e4 ef ff ff 48 8d 7b 12 e8\n[69133.561979] RSP: 0018:ffffc90000006fc0 EFLAGS: 00010246\n[69133.561988] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffff82f33e20 RCX: ffffffff81ab7e19\n[69133.561994] RDX: dffffc0000000000 RSI: ffffc90000007388 RDI: ffff888103a1b418\n[69133.562001] RBP: ffffc90000007310 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000\n[69133.562007] R10: ffffc90000007388 R11: ffffffff810cface R12: ffff888103a1b400\n[69133.562013] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffffffff82f33e2a R15: ffffffff82f33e28\n[69133.562020] FS: 00007f40f7131740(0000) GS:ffff888390800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n[69133.562027] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n[69133.562033] CR2: 00007f40f7346ee0 CR3: 000000015d200001 CR4: 00000000001706f0\n[69133.562040] Call Trace:\n[69133.562044] \u0026lt;IRQ\u0026gt;\n[69133.562049] ? __warn+0x9f/0x1a0\n[ 1211.841384] ? __skb_flow_dissect+0x107e/0x2860\n[...]\n[ 1211.841496] ? bpf_flow_dissect+0x160/0x160\n[ 1211.841753] __skb_get_hash+0x97/0x280\n[ 1211.841765] ? __skb_get_hash_symmetric+0x230/0x230\n[ 1211.841776] ? mod_find+0xbf/0xe0\n[ 1211.841786] ? get_stack_info_noinstr+0x12/0xe0\n[ 1211.841798] ? bpf_ksym_find+0x56/0xe0\n[ 1211.841807] ? __rcu_read_unlock+0x2a/0x70\n[ 1211.841819] nft_trace_init+0x1b9/0x1c0 [nf_tables]\n[ 1211.841895] ? nft_trace_notify+0x830/0x830 [nf_tables]\n[ 1211.841964] ? get_stack_info+0x2b/0x80\n[ 1211.841975] ? nft_do_chain_arp+0x80/0x80 [nf_tables]\n[ 1211.842044] nft_do_chain+0x79c/0x850 [nf_tables](CVE-2024-42321)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nmlxsw: spectrum_acl_erp: Fix object nesting warning\r\n\r\nACLs in Spectrum-2 and newer ASICs can reside in the algorithmic TCAM\n(A-TCAM) or in the ordinary circuit TCAM (C-TCAM). The former can\ncontain more ACLs (i.e., tc filters), but the number of masks in each\nregion (i.e., tc chain) is limited.\r\n\r\nIn order to mitigate the effects of the above limitation, the device\nallows filters to share a single mask if their masks only differ in up\nto 8 consecutive bits. For example, dst_ip/25 can be represented using\ndst_ip/24 with a delta of 1 bit. The C-TCAM does not have a limit on the\nnumber of masks being used (and therefore does not support mask\naggregation), but can contain a limited number of filters.\r\n\r\nThe driver uses the \u0026quot;objagg\u0026quot; library to perform the mask aggregation by\npassing it objects that consist of the filter\u0026apos;s mask and whether the\nfilter is to be inserted into the A-TCAM or the C-TCAM since filters in\ndifferent TCAMs cannot share a mask.\r\n\r\nThe set of created objects is dependent on the insertion order of the\nfilters and is not necessarily optimal. Therefore, the driver will\nperiodically ask the library to compute a more optimal set (\u0026quot;hints\u0026quot;) by\nlooking at all the existing objects.\r\n\r\nWhen the library asks the driver whether two objects can be aggregated\nthe driver only compares the provided masks and ignores the A-TCAM /\nC-TCAM indication. This is the right thing to do since the goal is to\nmove as many filters as possible to the A-TCAM. The driver also forbids\ntwo identical masks from being aggregated since this can only happen if\none was intentionally put in the C-TCAM to avoid a conflict in the\nA-TCAM.\r\n\r\nThe above can result in the following set of hints:\r\n\r\nH1: {mask X, A-TCAM} -\u0026gt; H2: {mask Y, A-TCAM} // X is Y + delta\nH3: {mask Y, C-TCAM} -\u0026gt; H4: {mask Z, A-TCAM} // Y is Z + delta\r\n\r\nAfter getting the hints from the library the driver will start migrating\nfilters from one region to another while consulting the computed hints\nand instructing the device to perform a lookup in both regions during\nthe transition.\r\n\r\nAssuming a filter with mask X is being migrated into the A-TCAM in the\nnew region, the hints lookup will return H1. Since H2 is the parent of\nH1, the library will try to find the object associated with it and\ncreate it if necessary in which case another hints lookup (recursive)\nwill be performed. This hints lookup for {mask Y, A-TCAM} will either\nreturn H2 or H3 since the driver passes the library an object comparison\nfunction that ignores the A-TCAM / C-TCAM indication.\r\n\r\nThis can eventually lead to nested objects which are not supported by\nthe library [1].\r\n\r\nFix by removing the object comparison function from both the driver and\nthe library as the driver was the only user. That way the lookup will\nonly return exact matches.\r\n\r\nI do not have a reliable reproducer that can reproduce the issue in a\ntimely manner, but before the fix the issue would reproduce in several\nminutes and with the fix it does not reproduce in over an hour.\r\n\r\nNote that the current usefulness of the hints is limited because they\ninclude the C-TCAM indication and represent aggregation that cannot\nactually happen. This will be addressed in net-next.\r\n\r\n[1]\nWARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 153 at lib/objagg.c:170 objagg_obj_parent_assign+0xb5/0xd0\nModules linked in:\nCPU: 0 PID: 153 Comm: kworker/0:18 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc6-custom-g70fbc2c1c38b #42\nHardware name: Mellanox Technologies Ltd. MSN3700C/VMOD0008, BIOS 5.11 10/10/2018\nWorkqueue: mlxsw_core mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work\nRIP: 0010:objagg_obj_parent_assign+0xb5/0xd0\n[...]\nCall Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n __objagg_obj_get+0x2bb/0x580\n objagg_obj_get+0xe/0x80\n mlxsw_sp_acl_erp_mask_get+0xb5/0xf0\n mlxsw_sp_acl_atcam_entry_add+0xe8/0x3c0\n mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_entry_create+0x5e/0xa0\n mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vchunk_migrate_one+0x16b/0x270\n mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work+0xbe/0x510\n process_one_work+0x151/0x370(CVE-2024-43880)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ngpio: prevent potential speculation leaks in gpio_device_get_desc()\r\n\r\nUserspace may trigger a speculative read of an address outside the gpio\ndescriptor array.\nUsers can do that by calling gpio_ioctl() with an offset out of range.\nOffset is copied from user and then used as an array index to get\nthe gpio descriptor without sanitization in gpio_device_get_desc().\r\n\r\nThis change ensures that the offset is sanitized by using\narray_index_nospec() to mitigate any possibility of speculative\ninformation leaks.\r\n\r\nThis bug was discovered and resolved using Coverity Static Analysis\nSecurity Testing (SAST) by Synopsys, Inc.(CVE-2024-44931)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndriver core: Fix uevent_show() vs driver detach race\r\n\r\nuevent_show() wants to de-reference dev-\u0026gt;driver-\u0026gt;name. There is no clean\nway for a device attribute to de-reference dev-\u0026gt;driver unless that\nattribute is defined via (struct device_driver).dev_groups. Instead, the\nanti-pattern of taking the device_lock() in the attribute handler risks\ndeadlocks with code paths that remove device attributes while holding\nthe lock.\r\n\r\nThis deadlock is typically invisible to lockdep given the device_lock()\nis marked lockdep_set_novalidate_class(), but some subsystems allocate a\nlocal lockdep key for @dev-\u0026gt;mutex to reveal reports of the form:\r\n\r\n ======================================================\n WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected\n 6.10.0-rc7+ #275 Tainted: G OE N\n ------------------------------------------------------\n modprobe/2374 is trying to acquire lock:\n ffff8c2270070de0 (kn-\u0026gt;active#6){++++}-{0:0}, at: __kernfs_remove+0xde/0x220\r\n\r\n but task is already holding lock:\n ffff8c22016e88f8 (\u0026amp;cxl_root_key){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x39/0x210\r\n\r\n which lock already depends on the new lock.\r\n\r\n the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:\r\n\r\n -\u0026gt; #1 (\u0026amp;cxl_root_key){+.+.}-{3:3}:\n __mutex_lock+0x99/0xc30\n uevent_show+0xac/0x130\n dev_attr_show+0x18/0x40\n sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xac/0xf0\n seq_read_iter+0x110/0x450\n vfs_read+0x25b/0x340\n ksys_read+0x67/0xf0\n do_syscall_64+0x75/0x190\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e\r\n\r\n -\u0026gt; #0 (kn-\u0026gt;active#6){++++}-{0:0}:\n __lock_acquire+0x121a/0x1fa0\n lock_acquire+0xd6/0x2e0\n kernfs_drain+0x1e9/0x200\n __kernfs_remove+0xde/0x220\n kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x5e/0xa0\n device_del+0x168/0x410\n device_unregister+0x13/0x60\n devres_release_all+0xb8/0x110\n device_unbind_cleanup+0xe/0x70\n device_release_driver_internal+0x1c7/0x210\n driver_detach+0x47/0x90\n bus_remove_driver+0x6c/0xf0\n cxl_acpi_exit+0xc/0x11 [cxl_acpi]\n __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x181/0x260\n do_syscall_64+0x75/0x190\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e\r\n\r\nThe observation though is that driver objects are typically much longer\nlived than device objects. It is reasonable to perform lockless\nde-reference of a @driver pointer even if it is racing detach from a\ndevice. Given the infrequency of driver unregistration, use\nsynchronize_rcu() in module_remove_driver() to close any potential\nraces. It is potentially overkill to suffer synchronize_rcu() just to\nhandle the rare module removal racing uevent_show() event.\r\n\r\nThanks to Tetsuo Handa for the debug analysis of the syzbot report [1].(CVE-2024-44952)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbonding: fix xfrm real_dev null pointer dereference\r\n\r\nWe shouldn\u0026apos;t set real_dev to NULL because packets can be in transit and\nxfrm might call xdo_dev_offload_ok() in parallel. All callbacks assume\nreal_dev is set.\r\n\r\n Example trace:\n kernel: BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 0000000000001030\n kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): making interface the new active one\n kernel: #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode\n kernel: #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page\n kernel: PGD 0 P4D 0\n kernel: Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT SMP\n kernel: CPU: 4 PID: 2237 Comm: ping Not tainted 6.7.7+ #12\n kernel: Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-2.fc40 04/01/2014\n kernel: RIP: 0010:nsim_ipsec_offload_ok+0xc/0x20 [netdevsim]\n kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): bond_ipsec_add_sa_all: failed to add SA\n kernel: Code: e0 0f 0b 48 83 7f 38 00 74 de 0f 0b 48 8b 47 08 48 8b 37 48 8b 78 40 e9 b2 e5 9a d7 66 90 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 8b 86 80 02 00 00 \u0026lt;83\u0026gt; 80 30 10 00 00 01 b8 01 00 00 00 c3 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 0f 1f\n kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): making interface the new active one\n kernel: RSP: 0018:ffffabde81553b98 EFLAGS: 00010246\n kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): bond_ipsec_add_sa_all: failed to add SA\n kernel:\n kernel: RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff9eb404e74900 RCX: ffff9eb403d97c60\n kernel: RDX: ffffffffc090de10 RSI: ffff9eb404e74900 RDI: ffff9eb3c5de9e00\n kernel: RBP: ffff9eb3c0a42000 R08: 0000000000000010 R09: 0000000000000014\n kernel: R10: 7974203030303030 R11: 3030303030303030 R12: 0000000000000000\n kernel: R13: ffff9eb3c5de9e00 R14: ffffabde81553cc8 R15: ffff9eb404c53000\n kernel: FS: 00007f2a77a3ad00(0000) GS:ffff9eb43bd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n kernel: CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n kernel: CR2: 0000000000001030 CR3: 00000001122ab000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0\n kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): making interface the new active one\n kernel: Call Trace:\n kernel: \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n kernel: ? __die+0x1f/0x60\n kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): bond_ipsec_add_sa_all: failed to add SA\n kernel: ? page_fault_oops+0x142/0x4c0\n kernel: ? do_user_addr_fault+0x65/0x670\n kernel: ? kvm_read_and_reset_apf_flags+0x3b/0x50\n kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): making interface the new active one\n kernel: ? exc_page_fault+0x7b/0x180\n kernel: ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30\n kernel: ? nsim_bpf_uninit+0x50/0x50 [netdevsim]\n kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): bond_ipsec_add_sa_all: failed to add SA\n kernel: ? nsim_ipsec_offload_ok+0xc/0x20 [netdevsim]\n kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): making interface the new active one\n kernel: bond_ipsec_offload_ok+0x7b/0x90 [bonding]\n kernel: xfrm_output+0x61/0x3b0\n kernel: bond0: (slave eni0np1): bond_ipsec_add_sa_all: failed to add SA\n kernel: ip_push_pending_frames+0x56/0x80(CVE-2024-44989)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nbonding: fix null pointer deref in bond_ipsec_offload_ok\r\n\r\nWe must check if there is an active slave before dereferencing the pointer.(CVE-2024-44990)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nnetfilter: flowtable: initialise extack before use\r\n\r\nFix missing initialisation of extack in flow offload.(CVE-2024-45018)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndmaengine: altera-msgdma: properly free descriptor in msgdma_free_descriptor\r\n\r\nRemove list_del call in msgdma_chan_desc_cleanup, this should be the role\nof msgdma_free_descriptor. In consequence replace list_add_tail with\nlist_move_tail in msgdma_free_descriptor.\r\n\r\nThis fixes the path:\n msgdma_free_chan_resources -\u0026gt; msgdma_free_descriptors -\u0026gt;\n msgdma_free_desc_list -\u0026gt; msgdma_free_descriptor\r\n\r\nwhich does not correctly free the descriptors as first nodes were not\nremoved from the list.(CVE-2024-46716)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amd/display: Stop amdgpu_dm initialize when stream nums greater than 6\r\n\r\n[Why]\nCoverity reports OVERRUN warning. Should abort amdgpu_dm\ninitialize.\r\n\r\n[How]\nReturn failure to amdgpu_dm_init.(CVE-2024-46817)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\narm64: acpi: Harden get_cpu_for_acpi_id() against missing CPU entry\r\n\r\nIn a review discussion of the changes to support vCPU hotplug where\na check was added on the GICC being enabled if was online, it was\nnoted that there is need to map back to the cpu and use that to index\ninto a cpumask. As such, a valid ID is needed.\r\n\r\nIf an MPIDR check fails in acpi_map_gic_cpu_interface() it is possible\nfor the entry in cpu_madt_gicc[cpu] == NULL. This function would\nthen cause a NULL pointer dereference. Whilst a path to trigger\nthis has not been established, harden this caller against the\npossibility.(CVE-2024-46822)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nELF: fix kernel.randomize_va_space double read\r\n\r\nELF loader uses \u0026quot;randomize_va_space\u0026quot; twice. It is sysctl and can change\nat any moment, so 2 loads could see 2 different values in theory with\nunpredictable consequences.\r\n\r\nIssue exactly one load for consistent value across one exec.(CVE-2024-46826)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\nplatform/x86: panasonic-laptop: Fix SINF array out of bounds accesses\r\n\r\nThe panasonic laptop code in various places uses the SINF array with index\nvalues of 0 - SINF_CUR_BRIGHT(0x0d) without checking that the SINF array\nis big enough.\r\n\r\nNot all panasonic laptops have this many SINF array entries, for example\nthe Toughbook CF-18 model only has 10 SINF array entries. So it only\nsupports the AC+DC brightness entries and mute.\r\n\r\nCheck that the SINF array has a minimum size which covers all AC+DC\nbrightness entries and refuse to load if the SINF array is smaller.\r\n\r\nFor higher SINF indexes hide the sysfs attributes when the SINF array\ndoes not contain an entry for that attribute, avoiding show()/store()\naccessing the array out of bounds and add bounds checking to the probe()\nand resume() code accessing these.(CVE-2024-46859)\r\n\r\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\r\n\r\ndrm/amd/display: Avoid overflow from uint32_t to uint8_t\r\n\r\n[WHAT \u0026amp; HOW]\ndmub_rb_cmd\u0026apos;s ramping_boundary has size of uint8_t and it is assigned\n0xFFFF. Fix it by changing it to uint8_t with value of 0xFF.\r\n\r\nThis fixes 2 INTEGER_OVERFLOW issues reported by Coverity.(CVE-2024-47661)",
"id": "OESA-2024-2295",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:07:46Z",
"published": "2024-10-25T11:07:46Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2024-2295"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47484"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52881"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27030"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27074"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27403"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35789"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35829"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-35871"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36004"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36007"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-36244"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38608"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-38612"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39495"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40958"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42289"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42321"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43880"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-44931"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-44952"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-44989"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-44990"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-45018"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46716"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46817"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46822"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46826"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46859"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47661"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2021-47484",
"CVE-2023-52881",
"CVE-2024-27030",
"CVE-2024-27074",
"CVE-2024-27403",
"CVE-2024-35789",
"CVE-2024-35829",
"CVE-2024-35871",
"CVE-2024-36004",
"CVE-2024-36007",
"CVE-2024-36244",
"CVE-2024-38608",
"CVE-2024-38612",
"CVE-2024-39495",
"CVE-2024-40958",
"CVE-2024-42289",
"CVE-2024-42321",
"CVE-2024-43880",
"CVE-2024-44931",
"CVE-2024-44952",
"CVE-2024-44989",
"CVE-2024-44990",
"CVE-2024-45018",
"CVE-2024-46716",
"CVE-2024-46817",
"CVE-2024-46822",
"CVE-2024-46826",
"CVE-2024-46859",
"CVE-2024-47661"
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.