GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

CVE-2025-24371 (GCVE-0-2025-24371)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-02-03 21:20 – Updated: 2025-02-04 19:16
VLAI
Title
Malicious peer can make node stuck in blocksync in github.com/cometbft/cometbft
Summary
CometBFT is a distributed, Byzantine fault-tolerant, deterministic state machine replication engine. In the `blocksync` protocol peers send their `base` and `latest` heights when they connect to a new node (`A`), which is syncing to the tip of a network. `base` acts as a lower ground and informs `A` that the peer only has blocks starting from height `base`. `latest` height informs `A` about the latest block in a network. Normally, nodes would only report increasing heights. If `B` fails to provide the latest block, `B` is removed and the `latest` height (target height) is recalculated based on other nodes `latest` heights. The existing code however doesn't check for the case where `B` first reports `latest` height `X` and immediately after height `Y`, where `X > Y`. `A` will be trying to catch up to 2000 indefinitely. This condition requires the introduction of malicious code in the full node first reporting some non-existing `latest` height, then reporting lower `latest` height and nodes which are syncing using `blocksync` protocol. This issue has been patched in versions 1.0.1 and 0.38.17 and all users are advised to upgrade. Operators may attempt to ban malicious peers from the network as a workaround.
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: no Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2025-02-04 19:15 UTC
CWE
  • CWE-703 - Improper Check or Handling of Exceptional Conditions
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version CPE status
cometbft cometbft Affected: < 0.38.17
Affected: = 1.0.0
guessed Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2025-24371",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2025-02-04T19:15:05.677855Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-02-04T19:16:21.174Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "cometbft",
          "vendor": "cometbft",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003c 0.38.17"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "= 1.0.0"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CometBFT is a distributed, Byzantine fault-tolerant, deterministic state machine replication engine. In the `blocksync` protocol peers send their `base` and `latest` heights when they connect to a new node (`A`), which is syncing to the tip of a network. `base` acts as a lower ground and informs `A` that the peer only has blocks starting from height `base`. `latest` height informs `A` about the latest block in a network. Normally, nodes would only report increasing heights. If `B` fails to provide the latest block, `B` is removed and the `latest` height (target height) is recalculated based on other nodes `latest` heights. The existing code however doesn\u0027t check for the case where `B` first reports `latest` height `X` and immediately after height `Y`, where `X \u003e Y`. `A` will be trying to catch up to 2000 indefinitely. This condition requires the introduction of malicious code in the full node first reporting some non-existing `latest` height, then reporting lower `latest` height and nodes which are syncing using `blocksync` protocol. This issue has been patched in versions 1.0.1 and 0.38.17 and all users are advised to upgrade. Operators may attempt to ban malicious peers from the network as a workaround."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 7.1,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-703",
              "description": "CWE-703: Improper Check or Handling of Exceptional Conditions",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2025-02-03T21:20:56.024Z",
        "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
        "shortName": "GitHub_M"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/cometbft/cometbft/security/advisories/GHSA-22qq-3xwm-r5x4",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/cometbft/cometbft/security/advisories/GHSA-22qq-3xwm-r5x4"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/cometbft/cometbft/releases/tag/v0.38.17",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/cometbft/cometbft/releases/tag/v0.38.17"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/cometbft/cometbft/releases/tag/v1.0.1",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/cometbft/cometbft/releases/tag/v1.0.1"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "GHSA-22qq-3xwm-r5x4",
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "Malicious peer can make node stuck in blocksync in github.com/cometbft/cometbft"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
    "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
    "cveId": "CVE-2025-24371",
    "datePublished": "2025-02-03T21:20:56.024Z",
    "dateReserved": "2025-01-20T15:18:26.991Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2025-02-04T19:16:21.174Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2025-24371",
      "date": "2026-09-17",
      "epss": "0.00464",
      "percentile": "0.39256"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2025-24371\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"published\":\"2025-02-03T22:15:28.460\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-06-17T08:58:55.260\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Deferred\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CometBFT is a distributed, Byzantine fault-tolerant, deterministic state machine replication engine. In the `blocksync` protocol peers send their `base` and `latest` heights when they connect to a new node (`A`), which is syncing to the tip of a network. `base` acts as a lower ground and informs `A` that the peer only has blocks starting from height `base`. `latest` height informs `A` about the latest block in a network. Normally, nodes would only report increasing heights. If `B` fails to provide the latest block, `B` is removed and the `latest` height (target height) is recalculated based on other nodes `latest` heights. The existing code however doesn\u0027t check for the case where `B` first reports `latest` height `X` and immediately after height `Y`, where `X \u003e Y`. `A` will be trying to catch up to 2000 indefinitely. This condition requires the introduction of malicious code in the full node first reporting some non-existing `latest` height, then reporting lower `latest` height and nodes which are syncing using `blocksync` protocol. This issue has been patched in versions 1.0.1 and 0.38.17 and all users are advised to upgrade. Operators may attempt to ban malicious peers from the network as a workaround.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"CometBFT es un motor de replicaci\u00f3n de m\u00e1quina de estados determinista, tolerante a fallas bizantinas y distribuido. En el protocolo `blocksync`, los pares env\u00edan sus alturas `base` y `latest` cuando se conectan a un nuevo nodo (`A`), que se sincroniza con la punta de una red. `base` act\u00faa como una base inferior e informa a `A` que el par solo tiene bloques que comienzan con la altura `base`. La altura `latest` informa a `A` sobre el \u00faltimo bloque en una red. Normalmente, los nodos solo informar\u00edan alturas crecientes. Si `B` no proporciona el \u00faltimo bloque, `B` se elimina y la altura `latest` (altura objetivo) se recalcula en funci\u00f3n de las alturas `latest` de otros nodos. Sin embargo, el c\u00f3digo existente no verifica el caso en el que `B` primero informa la `latest` altura `X` e inmediatamente despu\u00e9s la altura `Y`, donde `X \u0026gt; Y`. `A` intentar\u00e1 alcanzar el 2000 indefinidamente. Esta condici\u00f3n requiere la introducci\u00f3n de c\u00f3digo malicioso en el nodo completo que primero informa una altura `latest` inexistente, luego informa una altura `latest` menor y nodos que se sincronizan mediante el protocolo `blocksync`. Este problema se ha corregido en las versiones 1.0.1 y 0.38.17 y se recomienda a todos los usuarios que actualicen. Los operadores pueden intentar prohibir el acceso de pares maliciosos a la red como workaround.\"}],\"affected\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"affectedData\":[{\"vendor\":\"cometbft\",\"product\":\"cometbft\",\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"\u003c 0.38.17\",\"status\":\"affected\"},{\"version\":\"= 1.0.0\",\"status\":\"affected\"}]}]}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV40\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"4.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X\",\"baseScore\":7.1,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"attackRequirements\":\"NONE\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"LOW\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"vulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"vulnIntegrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"vulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"subConfidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subIntegrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"exploitMaturity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"confidentialityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"integrityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"availabilityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackVector\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackComplexity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackRequirements\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedPrivilegesRequired\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedUserInteraction\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Safety\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Automatable\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Recovery\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"valueDensity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"providerUrgency\":\"NOT_DEFINED\"}}],\"ssvcV203\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"ssvcData\":{\"timestamp\":\"2025-02-04T19:15:05.677855Z\",\"id\":\"CVE-2025-24371\",\"options\":[{\"exploitation\":\"none\"},{\"automatable\":\"no\"},{\"technicalImpact\":\"partial\"}],\"role\":\"CISA Coordinator\",\"version\":\"2.0.3\"}}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-703\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/cometbft/cometbft/releases/tag/v0.38.17\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/cometbft/cometbft/releases/tag/v1.0.1\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/cometbft/cometbft/security/advisories/GHSA-22qq-3xwm-r5x4\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"}]}}",
    "redhat_vex": {
      "current_release_date": "2025-05-28T17:16:35+00:00",
      "cve": "CVE-2025-24371",
      "id": "CVE-2025-24371",
      "initial_release_date": "2025-01-01T00:00:00+00:00",
      "product_status:known_not_affected": "1",
      "source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
      "status": "final",
      "title": "Malicious peer can make node stuck in blocksync in github.com/cometbft/cometbft",
      "url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2025/cve-2025-24371.json",
      "version": "3"
    },
    "suse_vex": {
      "aggregate_severity": "important",
      "current_release_date": "2026-07-17T13:14:11Z",
      "cve": "CVE-2025-24371",
      "id": "CVE-2025-24371",
      "initial_release_date": "2025-02-06T03:48:04Z",
      "product_status:recommended": "3",
      "source": "SUSE CSAF VEX",
      "status": "interim",
      "title": "SUSE CVE CVE-2025-24371",
      "url": "https://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/security/csaf-vex/cve-2025-24371.json",
      "version": "12"
    },
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2025-24371\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2025-02-04T19:15:05.677855Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-02-04T19:16:10.482Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"Malicious peer can make node stuck in blocksync in github.com/cometbft/cometbft\", \"source\": {\"advisory\": \"GHSA-22qq-3xwm-r5x4\", \"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}, \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV4_0\": {\"version\": \"4.0\", \"baseScore\": 7.1, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"attackRequirements\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"LOW\", \"subIntegrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnIntegrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"subAvailabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnAvailabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"subConfidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnConfidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\"}}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"cometbft\", \"product\": \"cometbft\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003c 0.38.17\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"= 1.0.0\"}]}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/cometbft/cometbft/security/advisories/GHSA-22qq-3xwm-r5x4\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/cometbft/cometbft/security/advisories/GHSA-22qq-3xwm-r5x4\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_CONFIRM\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/cometbft/cometbft/releases/tag/v0.38.17\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/cometbft/cometbft/releases/tag/v0.38.17\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/cometbft/cometbft/releases/tag/v1.0.1\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/cometbft/cometbft/releases/tag/v1.0.1\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CometBFT is a distributed, Byzantine fault-tolerant, deterministic state machine replication engine. In the `blocksync` protocol peers send their `base` and `latest` heights when they connect to a new node (`A`), which is syncing to the tip of a network. `base` acts as a lower ground and informs `A` that the peer only has blocks starting from height `base`. `latest` height informs `A` about the latest block in a network. Normally, nodes would only report increasing heights. If `B` fails to provide the latest block, `B` is removed and the `latest` height (target height) is recalculated based on other nodes `latest` heights. The existing code however doesn\u0027t check for the case where `B` first reports `latest` height `X` and immediately after height `Y`, where `X \u003e Y`. `A` will be trying to catch up to 2000 indefinitely. This condition requires the introduction of malicious code in the full node first reporting some non-existing `latest` height, then reporting lower `latest` height and nodes which are syncing using `blocksync` protocol. This issue has been patched in versions 1.0.1 and 0.38.17 and all users are advised to upgrade. Operators may attempt to ban malicious peers from the network as a workaround.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-703\", \"description\": \"CWE-703: Improper Check or Handling of Exceptional Conditions\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"shortName\": \"GitHub_M\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-02-03T21:20:56.024Z\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2025-24371\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-02-04T19:16:21.174Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2025-01-20T15:18:26.991Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"datePublished\": \"2025-02-03T21:20:56.024Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"GitHub_M\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.1"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…