CVE-2025-25529 (GCVE-0-2025-25529)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-02-11 00:00 – Updated: 2025-02-13 17:45
VLAI?
Summary
Buffer overflow vulnerability in Digital China DCBC Gateway 200-2.1.1 due to the lack of length verification, which is related to the configuration of static NAT rules. Attackers who successfully exploit this vulnerability can cause the remote target device to crash or execute arbitrary commands.
CWE
  • n/a
Assigner
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "cvssV3_1": {
              "attackComplexity": "LOW",
              "attackVector": "LOCAL",
              "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
              "baseScore": 5.1,
              "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
              "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
              "integrityImpact": "LOW",
              "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
              "scope": "UNCHANGED",
              "userInteraction": "NONE",
              "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
              "version": "3.1"
            }
          },
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2025-25529",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "total"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2025-02-13T17:45:07.205023Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "problemTypes": [
          {
            "descriptions": [
              {
                "cweId": "CWE-120",
                "description": "CWE-120 Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input (\u0027Classic Buffer Overflow\u0027)",
                "lang": "en",
                "type": "CWE"
              }
            ]
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-02-13T17:45:39.819Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Buffer overflow vulnerability in Digital China DCBC Gateway 200-2.1.1 due to the lack of length verification, which is related to the configuration of static NAT rules. Attackers who successfully exploit this vulnerability can cause the remote target device to crash or execute arbitrary commands."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "n/a",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2025-02-11T19:23:59.743Z",
        "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
        "shortName": "mitre"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://gist.github.com/XiaoCurry/121e150c1cc100eab2cbd8ba3b55626b"
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
    "assignerShortName": "mitre",
    "cveId": "CVE-2025-25529",
    "datePublished": "2025-02-11T00:00:00.000Z",
    "dateReserved": "2025-02-07T00:00:00.000Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2025-02-13T17:45:39.819Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2025-25529\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2025-02-11T20:15:39.217\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-02-13T18:18:24.400\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Awaiting Analysis\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Buffer overflow vulnerability in Digital China DCBC Gateway 200-2.1.1 due to the lack of length verification, which is related to the configuration of static NAT rules. Attackers who successfully exploit this vulnerability can cause the remote target device to crash or execute arbitrary commands.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Vulnerabilidad de desbordamiento de b\u00fafer en Digital China DCBC Gateway 200-2.1.1 debido a la falta de verificaci\u00f3n de longitud, que est\u00e1 relacionada con la configuraci\u00f3n de reglas NAT est\u00e1ticas. Los atacantes que aprovechen esta vulnerabilidad con \u00e9xito pueden provocar que el dispositivo de destino remoto se bloquee o ejecute comandos arbitrarios.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N\",\"baseScore\":5.1,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"LOCAL\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"integrityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.5,\"impactScore\":2.5}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-120\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://gist.github.com/XiaoCurry/121e150c1cc100eab2cbd8ba3b55626b\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"}]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…