CVE-2025-5994 (GCVE-0-2025-5994)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-07-16 14:38 – Updated: 2025-11-03 18:13
VLAI
Title
Cache poisoning via the ECS-enabled Rebirthday Attack
Summary
A multi-vendor cache poisoning vulnerability named 'Rebirthday Attack' has been discovered in caching resolvers that support EDNS Client Subnet (ECS). Unbound is also vulnerable when compiled with ECS support, i.e., '--enable-subnet', AND configured to send ECS information along with queries to upstream name servers, i.e., at least one of the 'send-client-subnet', 'client-subnet-zone' or 'client-subnet-always-forward' options is used. Resolvers supporting ECS need to segregate outgoing queries to accommodate for different outgoing ECS information. This re-opens up resolvers to a birthday paradox attack (Rebirthday Attack) that tries to match the DNS transaction ID in order to cache non-ECS poisonous replies.
Severity
8.7 (High)
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/R:U/V:C
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: yes Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
  • CWE-349 - Acceptance of Extraneous Untrusted Data With Trusted Data
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
NLnet Labs Unbound Affected: 1.6.2 , < 1.23.0 (semver)
Create a notification for this product.
Date Public
2025-07-16 00:00
Credits
Xiang Li (AOSP Lab, Nankai University)
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2025-5994",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2025-07-16T15:42:14.147972Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-07-16T15:42:18.657Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      },
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-11-03T18:13:56.352Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/08/msg00019.html"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "Unbound",
          "vendor": "NLnet Labs",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "1.23.0",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "1.6.2",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "Xiang Li (AOSP Lab, Nankai University)"
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2025-07-16T00:00:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "A multi-vendor cache poisoning vulnerability named \u0027Rebirthday Attack\u0027 has been discovered in caching resolvers that support EDNS Client Subnet (ECS). Unbound is also vulnerable when compiled with ECS support, i.e., \u0027--enable-subnet\u0027, AND configured to send ECS information along with queries to upstream name servers, i.e., at least one of the \u0027send-client-subnet\u0027, \u0027client-subnet-zone\u0027 or \u0027client-subnet-always-forward\u0027 options is used. Resolvers supporting ECS need to segregate outgoing queries to accommodate for different outgoing ECS information. This re-opens up resolvers to a birthday paradox attack (Rebirthday Attack) that tries to match the DNS transaction ID in order to cache non-ECS poisonous replies."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "baseScore": 8.7,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/R:U/V:C",
            "version": "4.0"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "Compiled and configured for ECS support"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-349",
              "description": "CWE-349 Acceptance of Extraneous Untrusted Data With Trusted Data",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2025-07-16T14:38:22.738Z",
        "orgId": "206fc3a0-e175-490b-9eaa-a5738056c9f6",
        "shortName": "NLnet Labs"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/unbound/CVE-2025-5994.txt"
        }
      ],
      "solutions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "This issue is fixed in 1.23.1 and all later versions. Not using EDNS Client Subnet (ECS) is also a mitigation for affected versions."
        }
      ],
      "timeline": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "time": "2025-01-02T00:00:00.000Z",
          "value": "Issue reported by Xiang Li"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "time": "2025-01-03T00:00:00.000Z",
          "value": "Issue acknowledged by NLnet Labs"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "time": "2025-01-08T00:00:00.000Z",
          "value": "Mitigation shared with Xiang Li"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "time": "2025-07-16T00:00:00.000Z",
          "value": "Fix released with Unbound 1.23.1 (coordinated with other vendors)"
        }
      ],
      "title": "Cache poisoning via the ECS-enabled Rebirthday Attack"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "206fc3a0-e175-490b-9eaa-a5738056c9f6",
    "assignerShortName": "NLnet Labs",
    "cveId": "CVE-2025-5994",
    "datePublished": "2025-07-16T14:38:22.738Z",
    "dateReserved": "2025-06-11T09:08:05.767Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2025-11-03T18:13:56.352Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2025-5994",
      "date": "2026-06-02",
      "epss": "0.00235",
      "percentile": "0.46448"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2025-5994\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"sep@nlnetlabs.nl\",\"published\":\"2025-07-16T15:15:33.490\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-11-03T19:16:14.563\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Awaiting Analysis\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"A multi-vendor cache poisoning vulnerability named \u0027Rebirthday Attack\u0027 has been discovered in caching resolvers that support EDNS Client Subnet (ECS). Unbound is also vulnerable when compiled with ECS support, i.e., \u0027--enable-subnet\u0027, AND configured to send ECS information along with queries to upstream name servers, i.e., at least one of the \u0027send-client-subnet\u0027, \u0027client-subnet-zone\u0027 or \u0027client-subnet-always-forward\u0027 options is used. Resolvers supporting ECS need to segregate outgoing queries to accommodate for different outgoing ECS information. This re-opens up resolvers to a birthday paradox attack (Rebirthday Attack) that tries to match the DNS transaction ID in order to cache non-ECS poisonous replies.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Se ha descubierto una vulnerabilidad de envenenamiento de cach\u00e9 multiproveedor, denominada \\\"Ataque Rebirthday\\\", en resolutores de cach\u00e9 compatibles con EDNS Client Subnet (ECS). Unbound tambi\u00e9n es vulnerable cuando se compila con compatibilidad con ECS (es decir, con \\\"--enable-subnet\\\") y se configura para enviar informaci\u00f3n de ECS junto con consultas a servidores de nombres ascendentes (es decir, se utiliza al menos una de las opciones \\\"send-client-subnet\\\", \\\"client-subnet-zone\\\" o \\\"client-subnet-always-forward\\\"). Los resolutores compatibles con ECS deben segregar las consultas salientes para adaptarlas a la diferente informaci\u00f3n de ECS saliente. Esto expone a los resolutores a un ataque de paradoja de cumplea\u00f1os (Ataque Rebirthday), que intenta coincidir con el ID de transacci\u00f3n DNS para almacenar en cach\u00e9 respuestas t\u00f3xicas que no sean de ECS.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV40\":[{\"source\":\"sep@nlnetlabs.nl\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"4.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:U/V:C/RE:X/U:X\",\"baseScore\":8.7,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"attackRequirements\":\"NONE\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"vulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"vulnIntegrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"vulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subConfidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subIntegrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"exploitMaturity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"confidentialityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"integrityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"availabilityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackVector\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackComplexity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackRequirements\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedPrivilegesRequired\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedUserInteraction\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Safety\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Automatable\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Recovery\":\"USER\",\"valueDensity\":\"CONCENTRATED\",\"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"providerUrgency\":\"NOT_DEFINED\"}}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"sep@nlnetlabs.nl\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-349\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/unbound/CVE-2025-5994.txt\",\"source\":\"sep@nlnetlabs.nl\"},{\"url\":\"https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/08/msg00019.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}]}}",
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2025-5994\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"yes\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2025-07-16T15:42:14.147972Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-07-16T15:42:16.296Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"Cache poisoning via the ECS-enabled Rebirthday Attack\", \"credits\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"finder\", \"value\": \"Xiang Li (AOSP Lab, Nankai University)\"}], \"metrics\": [{\"format\": \"CVSS\", \"cvssV4_0\": {\"version\": \"4.0\", \"baseScore\": 8.7, \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/R:U/V:C\"}, \"scenarios\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Compiled and configured for ECS support\"}]}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"NLnet Labs\", \"product\": \"Unbound\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"1.6.2\", \"lessThan\": \"1.23.0\", \"versionType\": \"semver\"}], \"defaultStatus\": \"unaffected\"}], \"timeline\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"time\": \"2025-01-02T00:00:00.000Z\", \"value\": \"Issue reported by Xiang Li\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"time\": \"2025-01-03T00:00:00.000Z\", \"value\": \"Issue acknowledged by NLnet Labs\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"time\": \"2025-01-08T00:00:00.000Z\", \"value\": \"Mitigation shared with Xiang Li\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"time\": \"2025-07-16T00:00:00.000Z\", \"value\": \"Fix released with Unbound 1.23.1 (coordinated with other vendors)\"}], \"solutions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"This issue is fixed in 1.23.1 and all later versions. Not using EDNS Client Subnet (ECS) is also a mitigation for affected versions.\"}], \"datePublic\": \"2025-07-16T00:00:00.000Z\", \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/unbound/CVE-2025-5994.txt\", \"tags\": [\"vendor-advisory\"]}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"A multi-vendor cache poisoning vulnerability named \u0027Rebirthday Attack\u0027 has been discovered in caching resolvers that support EDNS Client Subnet (ECS). Unbound is also vulnerable when compiled with ECS support, i.e., \u0027--enable-subnet\u0027, AND configured to send ECS information along with queries to upstream name servers, i.e., at least one of the \u0027send-client-subnet\u0027, \u0027client-subnet-zone\u0027 or \u0027client-subnet-always-forward\u0027 options is used. Resolvers supporting ECS need to segregate outgoing queries to accommodate for different outgoing ECS information. This re-opens up resolvers to a birthday paradox attack (Rebirthday Attack) that tries to match the DNS transaction ID in order to cache non-ECS poisonous replies.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-349\", \"description\": \"CWE-349 Acceptance of Extraneous Untrusted Data With Trusted Data\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"206fc3a0-e175-490b-9eaa-a5738056c9f6\", \"shortName\": \"NLnet Labs\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-07-16T14:38:22.738Z\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2025-5994\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-07-16T15:42:18.657Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2025-06-11T09:08:05.767Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"206fc3a0-e175-490b-9eaa-a5738056c9f6\", \"datePublished\": \"2025-07-16T14:38:22.738Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"NLnet Labs\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.1"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.