CVE-2025-61727 (GCVE-0-2025-61727)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-12-03 19:37 – Updated: 2025-12-03 22:06
VLAI
Title
Improper application of excluded DNS name constraints when verifying wildcard names in crypto/x509
Summary
An excluded subdomain constraint in a certificate chain does not restrict the usage of wildcard SANs in the leaf certificate. For example a constraint that excludes the subdomain test.example.com does not prevent a leaf certificate from claiming the SAN *.example.com.
Severity
6.5 (Medium)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: yes Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
  • CWE-295 - Improper Certificate Validation
Assigner
Go
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
Go standard library crypto/x509 Affected: 0 , < 1.24.11 (semver)
Affected: 1.25.0 , < 1.25.5 (semver)
Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "cvssV3_1": {
              "attackComplexity": "LOW",
              "attackVector": "NETWORK",
              "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
              "baseScore": 6.5,
              "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
              "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
              "integrityImpact": "LOW",
              "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
              "scope": "UNCHANGED",
              "userInteraction": "NONE",
              "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
              "version": "3.1"
            }
          },
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2025-61727",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2025-12-03T22:06:13.958433Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-12-03T22:06:17.007Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "collectionURL": "https://pkg.go.dev",
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "packageName": "crypto/x509",
          "product": "crypto/x509",
          "programRoutines": [
            {
              "name": "Certificate.Verify"
            }
          ],
          "vendor": "Go standard library",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "1.24.11",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "1.25.5",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "1.25.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "An excluded subdomain constraint in a certificate chain does not restrict the usage of wildcard SANs in the leaf certificate. For example a constraint that excludes the subdomain test.example.com does not prevent a leaf certificate from claiming the SAN *.example.com."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation",
              "lang": "en"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2025-12-03T19:37:15.054Z",
        "orgId": "1bb62c36-49e3-4200-9d77-64a1400537cc",
        "shortName": "Go"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://go.dev/cl/723900"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://go.dev/issue/76442"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://groups.google.com/g/golang-announce/c/8FJoBkPddm4"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2025-4175"
        }
      ],
      "title": "Improper application of excluded DNS name constraints when verifying wildcard names in crypto/x509"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "1bb62c36-49e3-4200-9d77-64a1400537cc",
    "assignerShortName": "Go",
    "cveId": "CVE-2025-61727",
    "datePublished": "2025-12-03T19:37:15.054Z",
    "dateReserved": "2025-09-30T15:05:03.605Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2025-12-03T22:06:17.007Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2025-61727",
      "date": "2026-06-22",
      "epss": "0.0027",
      "percentile": "0.18304"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2025-61727\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security@golang.org\",\"published\":\"2025-12-03T20:16:25.607\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-12-18T20:15:10.957\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Analyzed\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"An excluded subdomain constraint in a certificate chain does not restrict the usage of wildcard SANs in the leaf certificate. For example a constraint that excludes the subdomain test.example.com does not prevent a leaf certificate from claiming the SAN *.example.com.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N\",\"baseScore\":6.5,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"integrityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":2.5}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-295\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:golang:go:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"1.24.11\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"F2E6FD2A-A487-4099-B91D-2429F286AC6D\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:golang:go:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"1.25\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"1.25.5\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"EC1866EE-ABDC-4F74-9657-70A1241D49BD\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://go.dev/cl/723900\",\"source\":\"security@golang.org\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"https://go.dev/issue/76442\",\"source\":\"security@golang.org\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\"]},{\"url\":\"https://groups.google.com/g/golang-announce/c/8FJoBkPddm4\",\"source\":\"security@golang.org\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\",\"Release Notes\"]},{\"url\":\"https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2025-4175\",\"source\":\"security@golang.org\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]}]}}",
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 6.5, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N\", \"integrityImpact\": \"LOW\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"LOW\"}}, {\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2025-61727\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"yes\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2025-12-03T22:06:13.958433Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-12-03T21:45:44.520Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"Improper application of excluded DNS name constraints when verifying wildcard names in crypto/x509\", \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"Go standard library\", \"product\": \"crypto/x509\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"0\", \"lessThan\": \"1.24.11\", \"versionType\": \"semver\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"1.25.0\", \"lessThan\": \"1.25.5\", \"versionType\": \"semver\"}], \"packageName\": \"crypto/x509\", \"collectionURL\": \"https://pkg.go.dev\", \"defaultStatus\": \"unaffected\", \"programRoutines\": [{\"name\": \"Certificate.Verify\"}]}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://go.dev/cl/723900\"}, {\"url\": \"https://go.dev/issue/76442\"}, {\"url\": \"https://groups.google.com/g/golang-announce/c/8FJoBkPddm4\"}, {\"url\": \"https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2025-4175\"}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"An excluded subdomain constraint in a certificate chain does not restrict the usage of wildcard SANs in the leaf certificate. For example a constraint that excludes the subdomain test.example.com does not prevent a leaf certificate from claiming the SAN *.example.com.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"description\": \"CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"1bb62c36-49e3-4200-9d77-64a1400537cc\", \"shortName\": \"Go\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-12-03T19:37:15.054Z\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2025-61727\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-12-03T22:06:17.007Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2025-09-30T15:05:03.605Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"1bb62c36-49e3-4200-9d77-64a1400537cc\", \"datePublished\": \"2025-12-03T19:37:15.054Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"Go\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.2"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.