CVE-2026-100865 (GCVE-0-2026-100865)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-27 01:28 – Updated: 2026-09-27 01:28
VLAI
Title
Heym before 0.0.53 Multiple RCE and Authentication Bypass Vulnerabilities
Summary
Heym before 0.0.53 contains multiple independent vulnerabilities. (1) The workflow condition evaluator uses Python eval() without an effective sandbox, allowing any user who can edit a workflow branch/condition node — or who can import a workflow template containing a malicious condition node — to execute arbitrary Python code as the backend process user when the workflow runs. (2) Slack webhook signature verification and (3) Telegram webhook secret-token verification fail open when the trigger node has no credentialId or an empty signing secret, allowing anyone who knows the public webhook URL to trigger workflows with the owner's credentials without authentication. (4) The OAuth authorization endpoint does not validate the redirect_uri scheme, so an attacker who registers a public OAuth client with a javascript: or data: redirect_uri and lures a victim to the consent screen receives the authorization code and executes attacker-controlled JavaScript in the Heym origin, including access to the victim's HttpOnly auth cookie. (5) WorkflowExecutionToken, PortalSession, HITLRequest.public_token, and OAuthAuthorizationCode values are stored in plaintext, so any database read exposure yields valid scoped bearer tokens, including portal and HITL tokens with a 168-hour TTL that permit workflow execution on behalf of the owner.
Severity
8.7 (High)
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
8.8 (High)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CWE
  • CWE-94 - Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version CPE status
heymrun heym Affected: 0 , < 0.0.53 (semver)
Unaffected: 0.0.53 (semver)
guessed Create a notification for this product.
Date Public
2026-06-26 00:00
Credits
okcomputerfan mbakgun
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "heym",
          "vendor": "heymrun",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "0.0.53",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "0.0.53",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "okcomputerfan"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "mbakgun"
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2026-06-26T00:00:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Heym before 0.0.53 contains multiple independent vulnerabilities. (1) The workflow condition evaluator uses Python eval() without an effective sandbox, allowing any user who can edit a workflow branch/condition node \u2014 or who can import a workflow template containing a malicious condition node \u2014 to execute arbitrary Python code as the backend process user when the workflow runs. (2) Slack webhook signature verification and (3) Telegram webhook secret-token verification fail open when the trigger node has no credentialId or an empty signing secret, allowing anyone who knows the public webhook URL to trigger workflows with the owner\u0027s credentials without authentication. (4) The OAuth authorization endpoint does not validate the redirect_uri scheme, so an attacker who registers a public OAuth client with a javascript: or data: redirect_uri and lures a victim to the consent screen receives the authorization code and executes attacker-controlled JavaScript in the Heym origin, including access to the victim\u0027s HttpOnly auth cookie. (5) WorkflowExecutionToken, PortalSession, HITLRequest.public_token, and OAuthAuthorizationCode values are stored in plaintext, so any database read exposure yields valid scoped bearer tokens, including portal and HITL tokens with a 168-hour TTL that permit workflow execution on behalf of the owner."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 8.7,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
          },
          "format": "CVSS"
        },
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "baseScore": 8.8,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "format": "CVSS"
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-94",
              "description": "Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027)",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-09-27T01:28:53.874Z",
        "orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
        "shortName": "VulnCheck"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "GitHub Security Advisory (GHSA-pm6h-x3h5-j38h)",
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/heymrun/heym/security/advisories/GHSA-pm6h-x3h5-j38h"
        },
        {
          "name": "VulnCheck Advisory: Heym before 0.0.53 Multiple RCE and Authentication Bypass Vulnerabilities",
          "tags": [
            "third-party-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/heym-before-0.0.53-multiple-rce-and-authentication-bypass-vulnerabilities"
        }
      ],
      "title": "Heym before 0.0.53 Multiple RCE and Authentication Bypass Vulnerabilities",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "vulncheck-endgame"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
    "assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-100865",
    "datePublished": "2026-09-27T01:28:53.874Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-09-27T00:20:54.407Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-09-27T01:28:53.874Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "nvd": {
      "cve": {
        "affected": [
          {
            "affectedData": [
              {
                "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
                "product": "heym",
                "vendor": "heymrun",
                "versions": [
                  {
                    "lessThan": "0.0.53",
                    "status": "affected",
                    "version": "0",
                    "versionType": "semver"
                  },
                  {
                    "status": "unaffected",
                    "version": "0.0.53",
                    "versionType": "semver"
                  }
                ]
              }
            ],
            "source": "disclosure@vulncheck.com"
          }
        ],
        "cveTags": [],
        "descriptions": [
          {
            "lang": "en",
            "value": "Heym before 0.0.53 contains multiple independent vulnerabilities. (1) The workflow condition evaluator uses Python eval() without an effective sandbox, allowing any user who can edit a workflow branch/condition node \u2014 or who can import a workflow template containing a malicious condition node \u2014 to execute arbitrary Python code as the backend process user when the workflow runs. (2) Slack webhook signature verification and (3) Telegram webhook secret-token verification fail open when the trigger node has no credentialId or an empty signing secret, allowing anyone who knows the public webhook URL to trigger workflows with the owner\u0027s credentials without authentication. (4) The OAuth authorization endpoint does not validate the redirect_uri scheme, so an attacker who registers a public OAuth client with a javascript: or data: redirect_uri and lures a victim to the consent screen receives the authorization code and executes attacker-controlled JavaScript in the Heym origin, including access to the victim\u0027s HttpOnly auth cookie. (5) WorkflowExecutionToken, PortalSession, HITLRequest.public_token, and OAuthAuthorizationCode values are stored in plaintext, so any database read exposure yields valid scoped bearer tokens, including portal and HITL tokens with a 168-hour TTL that permit workflow execution on behalf of the owner."
          }
        ],
        "id": "CVE-2026-100865",
        "lastModified": "2026-09-27T02:17:26.410",
        "metrics": {
          "cvssMetricV31": [
            {
              "cvssData": {
                "attackComplexity": "LOW",
                "attackVector": "NETWORK",
                "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
                "baseScore": 8.8,
                "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
                "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
                "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
                "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
                "scope": "UNCHANGED",
                "userInteraction": "NONE",
                "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
                "version": "3.1"
              },
              "exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
              "impactScore": 5.9,
              "source": "disclosure@vulncheck.com",
              "type": "Primary"
            }
          ],
          "cvssMetricV40": [
            {
              "cvssData": {
                "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "attackComplexity": "LOW",
                "attackRequirements": "NONE",
                "attackVector": "NETWORK",
                "availabilityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "baseScore": 8.7,
                "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
                "confidentialityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "integrityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "modifiedAttackComplexity": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "modifiedAttackRequirements": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "modifiedAttackVector": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "modifiedPrivilegesRequired": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "modifiedSubIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "modifiedUserInteraction": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
                "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
                "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
                "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
                "userInteraction": "NONE",
                "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
                "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
                "version": "4.0",
                "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
                "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
                "vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
                "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
              },
              "source": "disclosure@vulncheck.com",
              "type": "Secondary"
            }
          ]
        },
        "published": "2026-09-27T02:17:26.410",
        "references": [
          {
            "source": "disclosure@vulncheck.com",
            "url": "https://github.com/heymrun/heym/security/advisories/GHSA-pm6h-x3h5-j38h"
          },
          {
            "source": "disclosure@vulncheck.com",
            "url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/heym-before-0.0.53-multiple-rce-and-authentication-bypass-vulnerabilities"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIdentifier": "disclosure@vulncheck.com",
        "vulnStatus": "Received",
        "weaknesses": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "en",
                "value": "CWE-94"
              }
            ],
            "source": "disclosure@vulncheck.com",
            "type": "Primary"
          }
        ]
      }
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.