CVE-2026-106120 (GCVE-0-2026-106120)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-06 18:04 – Updated: 2026-10-06 18:04
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
LiquidJS: ownPropertyOnly bypass for inherited array indices in first/last/join/reverse/slice/compact, `.first`/`.last`, negative index, and for-loop iteration
Summary
LiquidJS is a Shopify / GitHub Pages compatible template engine in pure JavaScript. Prior to 10.27.2, enabling ownPropertyOnly does not consistently restrict inherited array indices because negative indexing, .first, .last, the first filter, the last filter, join, reverse, slice, compact, and for-loop iteration can read prototype-provided elements outside readJSProperty(). An attacker who can influence prototype state or inherited array-index data and cause templates to render affected operations can disclose values that ownPropertyOnly is expected to hide. Direct positive indexing and ordinary object prototype reads are blocked, but the alternate array paths remain affected. This issue is fixed in 10.27.2.
Severity
CWE
- CWE-200 - Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
Assigner
References
4 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/harttle/liquidjs/security/advi… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/harttle/liquidjs/pull/924 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/harttle/liquidjs/commit/552819… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/harttle/liquidjs/releases/tag/… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "liquidjs",
"vendor": "harttle",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 10.27.2"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "LiquidJS is a Shopify / GitHub Pages compatible template engine in pure JavaScript. Prior to 10.27.2, enabling ownPropertyOnly does not consistently restrict inherited array indices because negative indexing, .first, .last, the first filter, the last filter, join, reverse, slice, compact, and for-loop iteration can read prototype-provided elements outside readJSProperty(). An attacker who can influence prototype state or inherited array-index data and cause templates to render affected operations can disclose values that ownPropertyOnly is expected to hide. Direct positive indexing and ordinary object prototype reads are blocked, but the alternate array paths remain affected. This issue is fixed in 10.27.2."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 6,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-200",
"description": "CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-06T18:04:14.907Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/harttle/liquidjs/security/advisories/GHSA-fwxr-j5w2-587m",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/harttle/liquidjs/security/advisories/GHSA-fwxr-j5w2-587m"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/harttle/liquidjs/pull/924",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/harttle/liquidjs/pull/924"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/harttle/liquidjs/commit/552819a84b80c62306fe61072628a756272dc749",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/harttle/liquidjs/commit/552819a84b80c62306fe61072628a756272dc749"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/harttle/liquidjs/releases/tag/v10.27.2",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/harttle/liquidjs/releases/tag/v10.27.2"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-fwxr-j5w2-587m",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "LiquidJS: ownPropertyOnly bypass for inherited array indices in first/last/join/reverse/slice/compact, `.first`/`.last`, negative index, and for-loop iteration"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-106120",
"datePublished": "2026-10-06T18:04:14.907Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-06T15:33:55.333Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-06T18:04:14.907Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-106120",
"date": "2026-10-07",
"epss": "0.0035",
"percentile": "0.26579"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"product": "liquidjs",
"vendor": "harttle",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 10.27.2"
}
]
}
],
"source": "security-advisories@github.com"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "LiquidJS is a Shopify / GitHub Pages compatible template engine in pure JavaScript. Prior to 10.27.2, enabling ownPropertyOnly does not consistently restrict inherited array indices because negative indexing, .first, .last, the first filter, the last filter, join, reverse, slice, compact, and for-loop iteration can read prototype-provided elements outside readJSProperty(). An attacker who can influence prototype state or inherited array-index data and cause templates to render affected operations can disclose values that ownPropertyOnly is expected to hide. Direct positive indexing and ordinary object prototype reads are blocked, but the alternate array paths remain affected. This issue is fixed in 10.27.2."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-106120",
"lastModified": "2026-10-06T19:17:43.123",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV40": [
{
"cvssData": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"baseScore": 6.0,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"integrityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackComplexity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackRequirements": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackVector": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedPrivilegesRequired": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedUserInteraction": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
},
"published": "2026-10-06T19:17:42.960",
"references": [
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/harttle/liquidjs/commit/552819a84b80c62306fe61072628a756272dc749"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/harttle/liquidjs/pull/924"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/harttle/liquidjs/releases/tag/v10.27.2"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/harttle/liquidjs/security/advisories/GHSA-fwxr-j5w2-587m"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security-advisories@github.com",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-200"
}
],
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.
Loading…