CVE-2026-128790 (GCVE-0-2026-128790)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-11-13 14:12 – Updated: 2026-11-13 14:12| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eclipse Foundation | Eclipse BaSyx Go Components |
Affected:
0 , < 1.1.3
(semver)
|
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Eclipse BaSyx Go Components",
"vendor": "Eclipse Foundation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.1.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Eric Nowak"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eIn Eclipse BaSyx Go Components versions up to and including 1.1.2, ABAC-enabled deployments of the Submodel Repository and the AAS Environment do not apply an access rule\u0027s `FILTERLIST` fragment filters to single Submodel reads.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e`GET /submodels` removes the fields that a rule\u0027s `FILTERLIST` hides, but `GET /submodels/{submodelIdentifier}` and `GET /submodels/{submodelIdentifier}/$metadata` return them unfiltered. An authenticated caller with READ access to a Submodel can therefore read fields that the access rules hide from them, for example `supplementalSemanticIds` keys that name the other parties allowed to read the Submodel.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIf versioning is enabled (`history.mode` set to `api` or `audit`), `GET /submodels/{submodelIdentifier}/$history` and `GET /shells/{aasIdentifier}/$history` in the Submodel Repository, AAS Repository and AAS Environment return the complete stored version without applying the rule\u0027s formula or fragment filters. A caller whose rules grant READ on these routes can read fields that the access rules hide, and Submodels and Asset Administration Shells that the direct read does not return to them at all.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe issue is fixed in Eclipse BaSyx Go Components v1.1.3.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "In Eclipse BaSyx Go Components versions up to and including 1.1.2, ABAC-enabled deployments of the Submodel Repository and the AAS Environment do not apply an access rule\u0027s `FILTERLIST` fragment filters to single Submodel reads.\n\n\n\n`GET /submodels` removes the fields that a rule\u0027s `FILTERLIST` hides, but `GET /submodels/{submodelIdentifier}` and `GET /submodels/{submodelIdentifier}/$metadata` return them unfiltered. An authenticated caller with READ access to a Submodel can therefore read fields that the access rules hide from them, for example `supplementalSemanticIds` keys that name the other parties allowed to read the Submodel.\n\n\n\nIf versioning is enabled (`history.mode` set to `api` or `audit`), `GET /submodels/{submodelIdentifier}/$history` and `GET /shells/{aasIdentifier}/$history` in the Submodel Repository, AAS Repository and AAS Environment return the complete stored version without applying the rule\u0027s formula or fragment filters. A caller whose rules grant READ on these routes can read fields that the access rules hide, and Submodels and Asset Administration Shells that the direct read does not return to them at all.\n\n\n\nThe issue is fixed in Eclipse BaSyx Go Components v1.1.3."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-1",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-1"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 7.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-863",
"description": "CWE-863",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-200",
"description": "CWE-200",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-13T14:12:17.843Z",
"orgId": "e51fbebd-6053-4e49-959f-1b94eeb69a2c",
"shortName": "eclipse"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://gitlab.eclipse.org/security/vulnerability-reports/-/work_items/1371#note_8664220"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/eclipse-basyx/basyx-go-components/pull/855"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/eclipse-basyx/basyx-go-components/pull/883"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/eclipse-basyx/basyx-go-components/releases/tag/v1.1.3"
},
{
"url": "https://gitlab.eclipse.org/security/cve-assignment/-/work_items/577"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.5"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "e51fbebd-6053-4e49-959f-1b94eeb69a2c",
"assignerShortName": "eclipse",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-128790",
"datePublished": "2026-11-13T14:12:17.843Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-11-13T07:53:13.412Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-13T14:12:17.843Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Eclipse BaSyx Go Components",
"vendor": "Eclipse Foundation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.1.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"source": "emo@eclipse.org"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In Eclipse BaSyx Go Components versions up to and including 1.1.2, ABAC-enabled deployments of the Submodel Repository and the AAS Environment do not apply an access rule\u0027s `FILTERLIST` fragment filters to single Submodel reads.\n\n\n\n`GET /submodels` removes the fields that a rule\u0027s `FILTERLIST` hides, but `GET /submodels/{submodelIdentifier}` and `GET /submodels/{submodelIdentifier}/$metadata` return them unfiltered. An authenticated caller with READ access to a Submodel can therefore read fields that the access rules hide from them, for example `supplementalSemanticIds` keys that name the other parties allowed to read the Submodel.\n\n\n\nIf versioning is enabled (`history.mode` set to `api` or `audit`), `GET /submodels/{submodelIdentifier}/$history` and `GET /shells/{aasIdentifier}/$history` in the Submodel Repository, AAS Repository and AAS Environment return the complete stored version without applying the rule\u0027s formula or fragment filters. A caller whose rules grant READ on these routes can read fields that the access rules hide, and Submodels and Asset Administration Shells that the direct read does not return to them at all.\n\n\n\nThe issue is fixed in Eclipse BaSyx Go Components v1.1.3."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-128790",
"lastModified": "2026-11-13T14:17:55.250",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV40": [
{
"cvssData": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"baseScore": 7.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"integrityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackComplexity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackRequirements": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackVector": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedPrivilegesRequired": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedUserInteraction": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"source": "emo@eclipse.org",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
},
"published": "2026-11-13T14:17:55.250",
"references": [
{
"source": "emo@eclipse.org",
"url": "https://github.com/eclipse-basyx/basyx-go-components/pull/855"
},
{
"source": "emo@eclipse.org",
"url": "https://github.com/eclipse-basyx/basyx-go-components/pull/883"
},
{
"source": "emo@eclipse.org",
"url": "https://github.com/eclipse-basyx/basyx-go-components/releases/tag/v1.1.3"
},
{
"source": "emo@eclipse.org",
"url": "https://gitlab.eclipse.org/security/cve-assignment/-/work_items/577"
},
{
"source": "emo@eclipse.org",
"url": "https://gitlab.eclipse.org/security/vulnerability-reports/-/work_items/1371#note_8664220"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "emo@eclipse.org",
"vulnStatus": "Received",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-200"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-863"
}
],
"source": "emo@eclipse.org",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
}
}
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.