CVE-2026-2815 (GCVE-0-2026-2815)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-06-25 13:27 – Updated: 2026-06-25 14:03
VLAI
Title
Incorrect use of the PUF key for user key generation in EFR32xG27 results in predictable keys
Summary
Incorrect use of the PUF key for user key generation in EFR32xG27 results in predictable keys
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-339 - Small seed space in PRNG
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://siliconlabs.lightning.force.com/sfc/servl… | vendor-advisorypermissions-required |
| https://github.com/SiliconLabsSoftware/sisdk-release | patch |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Silicon Labs | SiSDK |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 2025.12.1
(semver)
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-2815",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-06-25T14:03:39.954725Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-25T14:03:49.129Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "SiSDK",
"vendor": "Silicon Labs",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "2025.12.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Incorrect use of the PUF key for user key generation in EFR32xG27 results in predictable keys"
}
],
"value": "Incorrect use of the PUF key for user key generation in EFR32xG27 results in predictable keys"
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-112",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-112 Brute Force"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT",
"baseScore": 8.4,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"subIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-339",
"description": "CWE-339 Small seed space in PRNG",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-25T13:27:45.446Z",
"orgId": "030b2754-1501-44a4-bef8-48be86a33bf4",
"shortName": "Silabs"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"permissions-required"
],
"url": "https://siliconlabs.lightning.force.com/sfc/servlet.shepherd/document/download/069Vm00000kDYsfIAG?operationContext=S1"
},
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/SiliconLabsSoftware/sisdk-release"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "INTERNAL"
},
"title": "Incorrect use of the PUF key for user key generation in EFR32xG27 results in predictable keys",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.1"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "030b2754-1501-44a4-bef8-48be86a33bf4",
"assignerShortName": "Silabs",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-2815",
"datePublished": "2026-06-25T13:27:45.446Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-02-19T16:49:32.148Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-25T14:03:49.129Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-2815",
"date": "2026-06-26",
"epss": "0.00159",
"percentile": "0.05458"
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-2815\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-06-25T14:03:39.954725Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-06-25T14:03:44.190Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"Incorrect use of the PUF key for user key generation in EFR32xG27 results in predictable keys\", \"source\": {\"discovery\": \"INTERNAL\"}, \"impacts\": [{\"capecId\": \"CAPEC-112\", \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CAPEC-112 Brute Force\"}]}], \"metrics\": [{\"format\": \"CVSS\", \"cvssV4_0\": {\"Safety\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"version\": \"4.0\", \"Recovery\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"baseScore\": 8.4, \"Automatable\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"attackVector\": \"ADJACENT\", \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"valueDensity\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N\", \"exploitMaturity\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"providerUrgency\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"attackRequirements\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"subIntegrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"vulnIntegrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"subAvailabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnAvailabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"subConfidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"vulnConfidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\": \"NOT_DEFINED\"}, \"scenarios\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"GENERAL\"}]}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"Silicon Labs\", \"product\": \"SiSDK\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"0\", \"versionType\": \"semver\", \"lessThanOrEqual\": \"2025.12.1\"}], \"defaultStatus\": \"unaffected\"}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://siliconlabs.lightning.force.com/sfc/servlet.shepherd/document/download/069Vm00000kDYsfIAG?operationContext=S1\", \"tags\": [\"vendor-advisory\", \"permissions-required\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/SiliconLabsSoftware/sisdk-release\", \"tags\": [\"patch\"]}], \"x_generator\": {\"engine\": \"Vulnogram 1.0.1\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Incorrect use of the PUF key for user key generation in EFR32xG27 results in predictable keys\", \"supportingMedia\": [{\"type\": \"text/html\", \"value\": \"Incorrect use of the PUF key for user key generation in EFR32xG27 results in predictable keys\", \"base64\": false}]}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-339\", \"description\": \"CWE-339 Small seed space in PRNG\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"030b2754-1501-44a4-bef8-48be86a33bf4\", \"shortName\": \"Silabs\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-06-25T13:27:45.446Z\"}}}",
"cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-2815\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-06-25T14:03:49.129Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-02-19T16:49:32.148Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"030b2754-1501-44a4-bef8-48be86a33bf4\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-06-25T13:27:45.446Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"Silabs\"}",
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…