CVE-2026-42960 (GCVE-0-2026-42960)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-05-20 09:21 – Updated: 2026-05-20 13:04
VLAI
Title
Possible cache poisoning via promiscuous records for the authority section
Summary
NLnet Labs Unbound up to and including version 1.25.0 is vulnerable to poisoning via promiscuous records for the authority section. Promiscuous RRSets that complement DNS replies in the authority section can be used to trick Unbound to cache such records. If an adversary is able to attach such records in a reply (i.e., spoofed packet, fragmentation attack) he would be able to poison Unbound's cache. A malicious actor can exploit the possible poisonous effect by injecting RRSets other than NS that are also accompanied by address records in a reply, for example MX. This could be achieved by trying to spoof a reply packet or fragmentation attacks. Unbound would then accept the relative address records in the additional section and cache them if the authority RRSet has enough trust at this point, i.e., in-zone data for the delegation point. Unbound 1.25.1 contains a patch with a fix that disregards address records from the additional section if they are not explicitly relevant only to authority NS records, mitigating the possible poison effect. This is a complement fix to CVE-2025-11411.
Severity
5.7 (Medium)
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:P/U:Amber
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: no Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
  • CWE-349 - Acceptance of Extraneous Untrusted Data With Trusted Data
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
NLnet Labs Unbound Affected: 0 , < 1.25.1 (semver)
Create a notification for this product.
Date Public
2026-05-20 00:00
Credits
TaoFei Guo (Peking University) Yang Luo (Tsinghua University) JianJun Chen (Tsinghua University)
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-42960",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-05-20T13:04:22.642063Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-05-20T13:04:34.933Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "Unbound",
          "vendor": "NLnet Labs",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "1.25.1",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "TaoFei Guo (Peking University)"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "Yang Luo (Tsinghua University)"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "JianJun Chen (Tsinghua University)"
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2026-05-20T00:00:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "NLnet Labs Unbound up to and including version 1.25.0 is vulnerable to poisoning via promiscuous records for the authority section. Promiscuous RRSets that complement DNS replies in the authority section can be used to trick Unbound to cache such records. If an adversary is able to attach such records in a reply (i.e., spoofed packet, fragmentation attack) he would be able to poison Unbound\u0027s cache. A malicious actor can exploit the possible poisonous effect by injecting RRSets other than NS that are also accompanied by address records in a reply, for example MX. This could be achieved by trying to spoof a reply packet or fragmentation attacks. Unbound would then accept the relative address records in the additional section and cache them if the authority RRSet has enough trust at this point, i.e., in-zone data for the delegation point. Unbound 1.25.1 contains a patch with a fix that disregards address records from the additional section if they are not explicitly relevant only to authority NS records, mitigating the possible poison effect. This is a complement fix to CVE-2025-11411."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "baseScore": 5.7,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:P/U:Amber",
            "version": "4.0"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-349",
              "description": "CWE-349: Acceptance of Extraneous Untrusted Data With Trusted Data",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-05-20T09:21:02.070Z",
        "orgId": "206fc3a0-e175-490b-9eaa-a5738056c9f6",
        "shortName": "NLnet Labs"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/unbound/CVE-2026-42960.txt"
        }
      ],
      "solutions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "This issue is fixed starting with version 1.25.1"
        }
      ],
      "timeline": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "time": "2025-11-28T00:00:00.000Z",
          "value": "Issue reported by TaoFei Guo"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "time": "2025-11-28T00:00:00.000Z",
          "value": "NLnet Labs acknowledges the report"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "time": "2025-12-22T00:00:00.000Z",
          "value": "NLnet Labs shares a patch"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "time": "2026-03-16T00:00:00.000Z",
          "value": "TaoFei Guo verifies patch"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "time": "2026-05-20T00:00:00.000Z",
          "value": "Fixes released with version 1.25.1"
        }
      ],
      "title": "Possible cache poisoning via promiscuous records for the authority section",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "cvelib 1.8.0"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "206fc3a0-e175-490b-9eaa-a5738056c9f6",
    "assignerShortName": "NLnet Labs",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-42960",
    "datePublished": "2026-05-20T09:21:02.070Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-05-07T10:13:43.999Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-05-20T13:04:34.933Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2026-42960",
      "date": "2026-07-26",
      "epss": "0.00249",
      "percentile": "0.16376"
    },
    "microsoft_vex": {
      "current_release_date": "2026-05-23T01:39:17.000Z",
      "cve": "CVE-2026-42960",
      "id": "msrc_CVE-2026-42960",
      "initial_release_date": "2026-05-02T00:00:00.000Z",
      "product_status:fixed": "1",
      "product_status:known_affected": "1",
      "source": "Microsoft CSAF VEX",
      "status": "final",
      "title": "Possible cache poisoning via promiscuous records for the authority section",
      "url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/csaf/vex/2026/msrc_cve-2026-42960.json",
      "version": "2"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-42960\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"sep@nlnetlabs.nl\",\"published\":\"2026-05-20T10:16:28.037\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-07-24T10:10:00.197\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Analyzed\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"NLnet Labs Unbound up to and including version 1.25.0 is vulnerable to poisoning via promiscuous records for the authority section. Promiscuous RRSets that complement DNS replies in the authority section can be used to trick Unbound to cache such records. If an adversary is able to attach such records in a reply (i.e., spoofed packet, fragmentation attack) he would be able to poison Unbound\u0027s cache. A malicious actor can exploit the possible poisonous effect by injecting RRSets other than NS that are also accompanied by address records in a reply, for example MX. This could be achieved by trying to spoof a reply packet or fragmentation attacks. Unbound would then accept the relative address records in the additional section and cache them if the authority RRSet has enough trust at this point, i.e., in-zone data for the delegation point. Unbound 1.25.1 contains a patch with a fix that disregards address records from the additional section if they are not explicitly relevant only to authority NS records, mitigating the possible poison effect. This is a complement fix to CVE-2025-11411.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"NLnet Labs Unbound hasta e incluyendo la versi\u00f3n 1.25.0 es vulnerable a envenenamiento a trav\u00e9s de registros promiscuos para la secci\u00f3n de autoridad. Los RRSets promiscuos que complementan las respuestas DNS en la secci\u00f3n de autoridad pueden usarse para enga\u00f1ar a Unbound para que almacene en cach\u00e9 dichos registros. Si un adversario es capaz de adjuntar dichos registros en una respuesta (es decir, paquete falsificado, ataque de fragmentaci\u00f3n) podr\u00eda envenenar la cach\u00e9 de Unbound. Un actor malicioso puede exploit el posible efecto de envenenamiento inyectando RRSets distintos de NS que tambi\u00e9n est\u00e9n acompa\u00f1ados de registros de direcci\u00f3n en una respuesta, por ejemplo MX. Esto podr\u00eda lograrse intentando falsificar un paquete de respuesta o mediante ataques de fragmentaci\u00f3n. Unbound aceptar\u00eda entonces los registros de direcci\u00f3n relativos en la secci\u00f3n adicional y los almacenar\u00eda en cach\u00e9 si el RRSet de autoridad tiene suficiente confianza en este punto, es decir, datos en zona para el punto de delegaci\u00f3n. Unbound 1.25.1 contiene un parche con una correcci\u00f3n que ignora los registros de direcci\u00f3n de la secci\u00f3n adicional si no son expl\u00edcitamente relevantes solo para los registros NS de autoridad, mitigando el posible efecto de envenenamiento. Esta es una correcci\u00f3n complementaria a CVE-2025-11411.\"}],\"affected\":[{\"source\":\"sep@nlnetlabs.nl\",\"affectedData\":[{\"vendor\":\"NLnet Labs\",\"product\":\"Unbound\",\"defaultStatus\":\"unaffected\",\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"0\",\"lessThan\":\"1.25.1\",\"versionType\":\"semver\",\"status\":\"affected\"}]}]}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV40\":[{\"source\":\"sep@nlnetlabs.nl\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"4.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:Amber\",\"baseScore\":5.7,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"ADJACENT\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"attackRequirements\":\"PRESENT\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"vulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"vulnIntegrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"vulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subConfidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subIntegrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"subAvailabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"exploitMaturity\":\"PROOF_OF_CONCEPT\",\"confidentialityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"integrityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"availabilityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackVector\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackComplexity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackRequirements\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedPrivilegesRequired\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedUserInteraction\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Safety\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Automatable\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Recovery\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"valueDensity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"providerUrgency\":\"AMBER\"}}],\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:H\",\"baseScore\":10.0,\"baseSeverity\":\"CRITICAL\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"CHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":5.8}],\"ssvcV203\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"ssvcData\":{\"timestamp\":\"2026-05-20T13:04:22.642063Z\",\"id\":\"CVE-2026-42960\",\"options\":[{\"exploitation\":\"none\"},{\"automatable\":\"no\"},{\"technicalImpact\":\"partial\"}],\"role\":\"CISA Coordinator\",\"version\":\"2.0.3\"}}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"sep@nlnetlabs.nl\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-349\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:nlnetlabs:unbound:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"1.25.1\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"45EC9AEF-23EC-4ECC-A769-18DF07B2CAEC\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/unbound/CVE-2026-42960.txt\",\"source\":\"sep@nlnetlabs.nl\",\"tags\":[\"Mitigation\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]}]}}",
    "redhat_vex": {
      "aggregate_severity": "Moderate",
      "current_release_date": "2026-07-02T10:33:58+00:00",
      "cve": "CVE-2026-42960",
      "id": "CVE-2026-42960",
      "initial_release_date": "2026-05-20T00:00:00+00:00",
      "product_status:fixed": "4",
      "product_status:known_affected": "30",
      "source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
      "status": "final",
      "title": "unbound: Unbound DNS Cache Poisoning via Promiscuous Additional Section RRSet Acceptance",
      "url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-42960.json",
      "version": "3"
    },
    "suse_vex": {
      "aggregate_severity": "moderate",
      "current_release_date": "2026-07-16T18:02:53Z",
      "cve": "CVE-2026-42960",
      "id": "CVE-2026-42960",
      "initial_release_date": "2026-05-30T02:06:38Z",
      "product_status:known_affected": "42",
      "product_status:recommended": "94",
      "source": "SUSE CSAF VEX",
      "status": "interim",
      "title": "SUSE CVE CVE-2026-42960",
      "url": "https://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/security/csaf-vex/cve-2026-42960.json",
      "version": "11"
    },
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-42960\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-05-20T13:04:22.642063Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-05-20T13:04:27.808Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"Possible cache poisoning via promiscuous records for the authority section\", \"credits\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"finder\", \"value\": \"TaoFei Guo (Peking University)\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"finder\", \"value\": \"Yang Luo (Tsinghua University)\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"finder\", \"value\": \"JianJun Chen (Tsinghua University)\"}], \"metrics\": [{\"format\": \"CVSS\", \"cvssV4_0\": {\"version\": \"4.0\", \"baseScore\": 5.7, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:P/U:Amber\"}, \"scenarios\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"GENERAL\"}]}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"NLnet Labs\", \"product\": \"Unbound\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"0\", \"lessThan\": \"1.25.1\", \"versionType\": \"semver\"}], \"defaultStatus\": \"unaffected\"}], \"timeline\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"time\": \"2025-11-28T00:00:00.000Z\", \"value\": \"Issue reported by TaoFei Guo\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"time\": \"2025-11-28T00:00:00.000Z\", \"value\": \"NLnet Labs acknowledges the report\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"time\": \"2025-12-22T00:00:00.000Z\", \"value\": \"NLnet Labs shares a patch\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"time\": \"2026-03-16T00:00:00.000Z\", \"value\": \"TaoFei Guo verifies patch\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"time\": \"2026-05-20T00:00:00.000Z\", \"value\": \"Fixes released with version 1.25.1\"}], \"solutions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"This issue is fixed starting with version 1.25.1\"}], \"datePublic\": \"2026-05-20T00:00:00.000Z\", \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/unbound/CVE-2026-42960.txt\", \"tags\": [\"vendor-advisory\"]}], \"x_generator\": {\"engine\": \"cvelib 1.8.0\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"NLnet Labs Unbound up to and including version 1.25.0 is vulnerable to poisoning via promiscuous records for the authority section. Promiscuous RRSets that complement DNS replies in the authority section can be used to trick Unbound to cache such records. If an adversary is able to attach such records in a reply (i.e., spoofed packet, fragmentation attack) he would be able to poison Unbound\u0027s cache. A malicious actor can exploit the possible poisonous effect by injecting RRSets other than NS that are also accompanied by address records in a reply, for example MX. This could be achieved by trying to spoof a reply packet or fragmentation attacks. Unbound would then accept the relative address records in the additional section and cache them if the authority RRSet has enough trust at this point, i.e., in-zone data for the delegation point. Unbound 1.25.1 contains a patch with a fix that disregards address records from the additional section if they are not explicitly relevant only to authority NS records, mitigating the possible poison effect. This is a complement fix to CVE-2025-11411.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-349\", \"description\": \"CWE-349: Acceptance of Extraneous Untrusted Data With Trusted Data\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"206fc3a0-e175-490b-9eaa-a5738056c9f6\", \"shortName\": \"NLnet Labs\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-05-20T09:21:02.070Z\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-42960\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-05-20T13:04:34.933Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-05-07T10:13:43.999Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"206fc3a0-e175-490b-9eaa-a5738056c9f6\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-05-20T09:21:02.070Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"NLnet Labs\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.2"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.