CVE-2026-44722 (GCVE-0-2026-44722)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-07-17 16:42 – Updated: 2026-07-17 17:25- CWE-480 - Use of Incorrect Operator
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/danifus/pyzipper/security/advi… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/danifus/pyzipper/commit/93ce88… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/danifus/pyzipper/releases/tag/v0.4.0 | x_refsource_MISC |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-44722",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-07-17T17:25:00.965188Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-17T17:25:08.270Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "pyzipper",
"vendor": "danifus",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 0.4.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "pyzipper is a replacement for Python\u0027s zipfile that can read and write AES encrypted zip files. Prior to 0.4.0, a Python operator precedence bug in pyzipper/zipfile_aes.py caused the AE-2 format to never be automatically selected during encryption, causing encrypted entries to be written in AE-1 format and exposing the plaintext CRC32 checksum in the ZIP header and, for unseekable zip archives, in the datadescripter section, allowing an attacker who possesses the archive to brute-force candidate plaintexts for small or low-entropy files by comparing CRC32 values. This issue is fixed in version 0.4.0."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.2,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-480",
"description": "CWE-480: Use of Incorrect Operator",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-17T16:42:01.472Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/danifus/pyzipper/security/advisories/GHSA-crqm-m339-7m2p",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/danifus/pyzipper/security/advisories/GHSA-crqm-m339-7m2p"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/danifus/pyzipper/commit/93ce88e7dfd1635443197dab3fb8d477cff579ae",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/danifus/pyzipper/commit/93ce88e7dfd1635443197dab3fb8d477cff579ae"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/danifus/pyzipper/releases/tag/v0.4.0",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/danifus/pyzipper/releases/tag/v0.4.0"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-crqm-m339-7m2p",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "pyzipper: Encryption bypass for small files encrypted with pyzipper"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-44722",
"datePublished": "2026-07-17T16:42:01.472Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-05-07T18:04:17.308Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-17T17:25:08.270Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-44722",
"date": "2026-10-29",
"epss": "0.00116",
"percentile": "0.01628"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"product": "pyzipper",
"vendor": "danifus",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 0.4.0"
}
]
}
],
"source": "security-advisories@github.com"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "pyzipper is a replacement for Python\u0027s zipfile that can read and write AES encrypted zip files. Prior to 0.4.0, a Python operator precedence bug in pyzipper/zipfile_aes.py caused the AE-2 format to never be automatically selected during encryption, causing encrypted entries to be written in AE-1 format and exposing the plaintext CRC32 checksum in the ZIP header and, for unseekable zip archives, in the datadescripter section, allowing an attacker who possesses the archive to brute-force candidate plaintexts for small or low-entropy files by comparing CRC32 values. This issue is fixed in version 0.4.0."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "pyzipper es un reemplazo para el m\u00f3dulo zipfile de Python que puede leer y escribir archivos zip cifrados con AES. Antes de la versi\u00f3n 0.4.0, un error de precedencia de operadores de Python en pyzipper/zipfile_aes.py hizo que el formato AE-2 nunca se seleccionara autom\u00e1ticamente durante el cifrado, lo que provoc\u00f3 que las entradas cifradas se escribieran en formato AE-1 y exponiendo la suma de verificaci\u00f3n CRC32 en texto plano en la cabecera ZIP y, para archivos zip no buscables, en la secci\u00f3n del descriptor de datos, permitiendo a un atacante que posee el archivo forzar por fuerza bruta posibles textos planos para archivos peque\u00f1os o de baja entrop\u00eda comparando los valores CRC32. Este problema est\u00e1 corregido en la versi\u00f3n 0.4.0."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-44722",
"lastModified": "2026-10-24T20:10:00.137",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.2,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.5,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2026-44722",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-07-17T17:25:00.965188Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2026-07-17T17:17:15.240",
"references": [
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/danifus/pyzipper/commit/93ce88e7dfd1635443197dab3fb8d477cff579ae"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/danifus/pyzipper/releases/tag/v0.4.0"
},
{
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"url": "https://github.com/danifus/pyzipper/security/advisories/GHSA-crqm-m339-7m2p"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security-advisories@github.com",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-480"
}
],
"source": "security-advisories@github.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-44722",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-07-17T17:25:00.965188Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-17T17:25:04.389Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "pyzipper",
"vendor": "danifus",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 0.4.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "pyzipper is a replacement for Python\u0027s zipfile that can read and write AES encrypted zip files. Prior to 0.4.0, a Python operator precedence bug in pyzipper/zipfile_aes.py caused the AE-2 format to never be automatically selected during encryption, causing encrypted entries to be written in AE-1 format and exposing the plaintext CRC32 checksum in the ZIP header and, for unseekable zip archives, in the datadescripter section, allowing an attacker who possesses the archive to brute-force candidate plaintexts for small or low-entropy files by comparing CRC32 values. This issue is fixed in version 0.4.0."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.2,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-480",
"description": "CWE-480: Use of Incorrect Operator",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-17T16:42:01.472Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/danifus/pyzipper/security/advisories/GHSA-crqm-m339-7m2p",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/danifus/pyzipper/security/advisories/GHSA-crqm-m339-7m2p"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/danifus/pyzipper/commit/93ce88e7dfd1635443197dab3fb8d477cff579ae",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/danifus/pyzipper/commit/93ce88e7dfd1635443197dab3fb8d477cff579ae"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/danifus/pyzipper/releases/tag/v0.4.0",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/danifus/pyzipper/releases/tag/v0.4.0"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-crqm-m339-7m2p",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "pyzipper: Encryption bypass for small files encrypted with pyzipper"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-44722",
"datePublished": "2026-07-17T16:42:01.472Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-05-07T18:04:17.308Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-17T17:25:08.270Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.