CVE-2026-44900 (GCVE-0-2026-44900)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-05-26 21:04 – Updated: 2026-05-28 14:12
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
epa4all-client: VAU Signature bypass
Summary
epa4all-client is the Java Client for epa4all / ePA 3.0 in the Telematik Infrastruktur. Prior to 1.2.1, in SignedPublicKeysTrustValidatorImpl.isTrusted(), the ECDSA signature verification at line 45 discards the boolean return value of Signature.verify(). The method performs certificate chain validation, OCSP check, and signature algorithm setup, but never checks whether the signature actually matches. For any structurally valid signature, it returns true. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.2.1.
Severity
8.1 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-05-28 14:12 UTC
CWE
- CWE-295 - Improper Certificate Validation
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/oviva-ag/epa4all-client/securi… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/oviva-ag/epa4all-client/pull/34 | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
2 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| oviva-ag | epa4all-client |
Affected:
< 1.2.1
|
|
| com.oviva.telematik | epa4all-client |
Affected:
< 1.2.1
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-44900",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-05-28T14:12:19.128422Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-28T14:12:28.907Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "epa4all-client",
"vendor": "oviva-ag",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 1.2.1"
}
]
},
{
"product": "epa4all-client",
"vendor": "com.oviva.telematik",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 1.2.1"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "epa4all-client is the Java Client for epa4all / ePA 3.0 in the Telematik Infrastruktur. Prior to 1.2.1, in SignedPublicKeysTrustValidatorImpl.isTrusted(), the ECDSA signature verification at line 45 discards the boolean return value of Signature.verify(). The method performs certificate chain validation, OCSP check, and signature algorithm setup, but never checks whether the signature actually matches. For any structurally valid signature, it returns true. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.2.1."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 8.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-295",
"description": "CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-26T21:04:53.961Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/oviva-ag/epa4all-client/security/advisories/GHSA-g8r3-5hwf-qp96",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/oviva-ag/epa4all-client/security/advisories/GHSA-g8r3-5hwf-qp96"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/oviva-ag/epa4all-client/pull/34",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/oviva-ag/epa4all-client/pull/34"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-g8r3-5hwf-qp96",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "epa4all-client: VAU Signature bypass"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-44900",
"datePublished": "2026-05-26T21:04:53.961Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-05-07T21:50:33.546Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-28T14:12:28.907Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-44900",
"date": "2026-08-14",
"epss": "0.00121",
"percentile": "0.02219"
},
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-44900\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"published\":\"2026-05-26T22:16:42.873\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-07-24T11:10:00.170\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Deferred\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"epa4all-client is the Java Client for epa4all / ePA 3.0 in the Telematik Infrastruktur. Prior to 1.2.1, in SignedPublicKeysTrustValidatorImpl.isTrusted(), the ECDSA signature verification at line 45 discards the boolean return value of Signature.verify(). The method performs certificate chain validation, OCSP check, and signature algorithm setup, but never checks whether the signature actually matches. For any structurally valid signature, it returns true. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.2.1.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"epa4all-client es el cliente Java para epa4all / ePA 3.0 en la Telematik Infrastruktur. Antes de 1.2.1, en SignedPublicKeysTrustValidatorImpl.isTrusted(), la verificaci\u00f3n de firma ECDSA en la l\u00ednea 45 descarta el valor de retorno booleano de Signature.verify(). El m\u00e9todo realiza la validaci\u00f3n de la cadena de certificados, la comprobaci\u00f3n OCSP y la configuraci\u00f3n del algoritmo de firma, pero nunca comprueba si la firma realmente coincide. Para cualquier firma estructuralmente v\u00e1lida, devuelve true. Esta vulnerabilidad se corrige en 1.2.1.\"}],\"affected\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"affectedData\":[{\"vendor\":\"oviva-ag\",\"product\":\"epa4all-client\",\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"\u003c 1.2.1\",\"status\":\"affected\"}]},{\"vendor\":\"com.oviva.telematik\",\"product\":\"epa4all-client\",\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"\u003c 1.2.1\",\"status\":\"affected\"}]}]}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N\",\"baseScore\":8.1,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"ADJACENT_NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.8,\"impactScore\":5.2}],\"ssvcV203\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"ssvcData\":{\"timestamp\":\"2026-05-28T14:12:19.128422Z\",\"id\":\"CVE-2026-44900\",\"options\":[{\"exploitation\":\"none\"},{\"automatable\":\"no\"},{\"technicalImpact\":\"total\"}],\"role\":\"CISA Coordinator\",\"version\":\"2.0.3\"}}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-295\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/oviva-ag/epa4all-client/pull/34\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/oviva-ag/epa4all-client/security/advisories/GHSA-g8r3-5hwf-qp96\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"}]}}",
"redhat_vex": {
"current_release_date": "2026-05-28T20:12:49+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2026-44900",
"id": "CVE-2026-44900",
"initial_release_date": "2026-01-01T00:00:00+00:00",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "1",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "epa4all-client: VAU Signature bypass",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-44900.json",
"version": "3"
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-44900\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"total\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-05-28T14:12:19.128422Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-05-28T14:12:25.731Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"epa4all-client: VAU Signature bypass\", \"source\": {\"advisory\": \"GHSA-g8r3-5hwf-qp96\", \"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}, \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 8.1, \"attackVector\": \"ADJACENT_NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"oviva-ag\", \"product\": \"epa4all-client\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003c 1.2.1\"}]}, {\"vendor\": \"com.oviva.telematik\", \"product\": \"epa4all-client\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003c 1.2.1\"}]}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/oviva-ag/epa4all-client/security/advisories/GHSA-g8r3-5hwf-qp96\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/oviva-ag/epa4all-client/security/advisories/GHSA-g8r3-5hwf-qp96\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_CONFIRM\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/oviva-ag/epa4all-client/pull/34\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/oviva-ag/epa4all-client/pull/34\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"epa4all-client is the Java Client for epa4all / ePA 3.0 in the Telematik Infrastruktur. Prior to 1.2.1, in SignedPublicKeysTrustValidatorImpl.isTrusted(), the ECDSA signature verification at line 45 discards the boolean return value of Signature.verify(). The method performs certificate chain validation, OCSP check, and signature algorithm setup, but never checks whether the signature actually matches. For any structurally valid signature, it returns true. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.2.1.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-295\", \"description\": \"CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"shortName\": \"GitHub_M\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-05-26T21:04:53.961Z\"}}}",
"cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-44900\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-05-28T14:12:28.907Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-05-07T21:50:33.546Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-05-26T21:04:53.961Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"GitHub_M\"}",
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Loading…
Loading…