GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

CVE-2026-49284 (GCVE-0-2026-49284)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-07-17 19:17 – Updated: 2026-07-20 19:22
VLAI
Title
SimpleSAMLphp SP accepts a response from an unexpected IdP when unsigned `Response/InResponseTo` is combined with a signed assertion lacking `SubjectConfirmationData/InResponseTo`
Summary
SimpleSAMLphp versions before 1.18.6 contain an information disclosure vulnerability. Prior to 2.4.7 and 2.5.2, SimpleSAMLphp's SAML SP ACS path does not enforce the IdP selected for an SP-initiated login when unsigned Response/InResponseTo is combined with a signed assertion lacking SubjectConfirmationData/InResponseTo, allowing a response issued by one trusted IdP to be bound to SP state created for another IdP and bypass flows that route users to a specific IdP, including deployments that set enable_unsolicited to false. This issue is fixed in versions 2.4.7 and 2.5.2.
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: no Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-07-20 19:21 UTC
CWE
  • CWE-345 - Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version CPE status
simplesamlphp simplesamlphp Affected: < 2.4.7
Affected: >= 2.5.0-rc1, < 2.5.2
guessed Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-49284",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-07-20T19:21:50.152369Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-07-20T19:22:12.247Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "simplesamlphp",
          "vendor": "simplesamlphp",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003c 2.4.7"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003e= 2.5.0-rc1, \u003c 2.5.2"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "SimpleSAMLphp versions before 1.18.6 contain an information disclosure vulnerability. Prior to 2.4.7 and 2.5.2, SimpleSAMLphp\u0027s SAML SP ACS path does not enforce the IdP selected for an SP-initiated login when unsigned Response/InResponseTo is combined with a signed assertion lacking SubjectConfirmationData/InResponseTo, allowing a response issued by one trusted IdP to be bound to SP state created for another IdP and bypass flows that route users to a specific IdP, including deployments that set enable_unsolicited to false. This issue is fixed in versions 2.4.7 and 2.5.2."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 7.1,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
            "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-345",
              "description": "CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-07-17T19:17:23.897Z",
        "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
        "shortName": "GitHub_M"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/simplesamlphp/simplesamlphp/security/advisories/GHSA-q8r6-xj3f-wrrm",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/simplesamlphp/simplesamlphp/security/advisories/GHSA-q8r6-xj3f-wrrm"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/simplesamlphp/simplesamlphp/releases/tag/v2.4.7",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/simplesamlphp/simplesamlphp/releases/tag/v2.4.7"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/simplesamlphp/simplesamlphp/releases/tag/v2.5.2",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/simplesamlphp/simplesamlphp/releases/tag/v2.5.2"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "GHSA-q8r6-xj3f-wrrm",
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "SimpleSAMLphp SP accepts a response from an unexpected IdP when unsigned `Response/InResponseTo` is combined with a signed assertion lacking `SubjectConfirmationData/InResponseTo`"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
    "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-49284",
    "datePublished": "2026-07-17T19:17:23.897Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-05-28T20:07:58.861Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-07-20T19:22:12.247Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2026-49284",
      "date": "2026-09-16",
      "epss": "0.00222",
      "percentile": "0.1294"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-49284\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"published\":\"2026-07-17T20:17:21.830\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-07-30T13:39:25.117\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Analyzed\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"SimpleSAMLphp versions before 1.18.6 contain an information disclosure vulnerability. Prior to 2.4.7 and 2.5.2, SimpleSAMLphp\u0027s SAML SP ACS path does not enforce the IdP selected for an SP-initiated login when unsigned Response/InResponseTo is combined with a signed assertion lacking SubjectConfirmationData/InResponseTo, allowing a response issued by one trusted IdP to be bound to SP state created for another IdP and bypass flows that route users to a specific IdP, including deployments that set enable_unsolicited to false. This issue is fixed in versions 2.4.7 and 2.5.2.\"}],\"affected\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"affectedData\":[{\"vendor\":\"simplesamlphp\",\"product\":\"simplesamlphp\",\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"\u003c 2.4.7\",\"status\":\"affected\"},{\"version\":\"\u003e= 2.5.0-rc1, \u003c 2.5.2\",\"status\":\"affected\"}]}]}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N\",\"baseScore\":7.1,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"LOW\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.8,\"impactScore\":4.2}],\"ssvcV203\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"ssvcData\":{\"timestamp\":\"2026-07-20T19:21:50.152369Z\",\"id\":\"CVE-2026-49284\",\"options\":[{\"exploitation\":\"none\"},{\"automatable\":\"no\"},{\"technicalImpact\":\"partial\"}],\"role\":\"CISA Coordinator\",\"version\":\"2.0.3\"}}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-345\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:simplesamlphp:simplesamlphp:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"2.4.7\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"0270F22E-4DF5-4409-9A28-9CD8A3EA0CBC\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:simplesamlphp:simplesamlphp:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"2.5.0\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"2.5.2\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"957D8DC0-2650-406C-BB4E-8A14CF9DE76A\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/simplesamlphp/simplesamlphp/releases/tag/v2.4.7\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"tags\":[\"Product\",\"Release Notes\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/simplesamlphp/simplesamlphp/releases/tag/v2.5.2\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"tags\":[\"Product\",\"Release Notes\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/simplesamlphp/simplesamlphp/security/advisories/GHSA-q8r6-xj3f-wrrm\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]}]}}",
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-49284\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-07-20T19:21:50.152369Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-07-20T19:22:02.910Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"SimpleSAMLphp SP accepts a response from an unexpected IdP when unsigned `Response/InResponseTo` is combined with a signed assertion lacking `SubjectConfirmationData/InResponseTo`\", \"source\": {\"advisory\": \"GHSA-q8r6-xj3f-wrrm\", \"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}, \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 7.1, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"LOW\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"LOW\"}}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"simplesamlphp\", \"product\": \"simplesamlphp\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003c 2.4.7\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003e= 2.5.0-rc1, \u003c 2.5.2\"}]}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/simplesamlphp/simplesamlphp/security/advisories/GHSA-q8r6-xj3f-wrrm\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/simplesamlphp/simplesamlphp/security/advisories/GHSA-q8r6-xj3f-wrrm\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_CONFIRM\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/simplesamlphp/simplesamlphp/releases/tag/v2.4.7\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/simplesamlphp/simplesamlphp/releases/tag/v2.4.7\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/simplesamlphp/simplesamlphp/releases/tag/v2.5.2\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/simplesamlphp/simplesamlphp/releases/tag/v2.5.2\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"]}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"SimpleSAMLphp versions before 1.18.6 contain an information disclosure vulnerability. Prior to 2.4.7 and 2.5.2, SimpleSAMLphp\u0027s SAML SP ACS path does not enforce the IdP selected for an SP-initiated login when unsigned Response/InResponseTo is combined with a signed assertion lacking SubjectConfirmationData/InResponseTo, allowing a response issued by one trusted IdP to be bound to SP state created for another IdP and bypass flows that route users to a specific IdP, including deployments that set enable_unsolicited to false. This issue is fixed in versions 2.4.7 and 2.5.2.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-345\", \"description\": \"CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"shortName\": \"GitHub_M\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-07-17T19:17:23.897Z\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-49284\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-07-20T19:22:12.247Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-05-28T20:07:58.861Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-07-17T19:17:23.897Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"GitHub_M\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.2"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…