Action not permitted
Modal body text goes here.
Modal Title
Modal Body
CVE-2026-53194 (GCVE-0-2026-53194)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-06-25 08:39 – Updated: 2026-08-05 12:34- CWE-787 - Out-of-bounds Write
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux |
Affected:
60b3013cdaf3fa8a17243ca46b19db3cbe08d943 , < 60af1fd82983c26604102e63a3fcc822c186cceb
(git)
Affected: 60b3013cdaf3fa8a17243ca46b19db3cbe08d943 , < 0a57320f71941d4e0b1307453c9a1f0939afe666 (git) Affected: 60b3013cdaf3fa8a17243ca46b19db3cbe08d943 , < 14147b7963685957839c76ba8094924e22777d79 (git) Affected: 60b3013cdaf3fa8a17243ca46b19db3cbe08d943 , < a1288cd700f721c1a119c4f1e8efa234e59caada (git) Affected: 60b3013cdaf3fa8a17243ca46b19db3cbe08d943 , < 70d86e355c564b5510fde61361df014f5476c83e (git) Affected: 60b3013cdaf3fa8a17243ca46b19db3cbe08d943 , < 372f33ebed747d91870f57c0a2e62884a870bffa (git) Affected: 60b3013cdaf3fa8a17243ca46b19db3cbe08d943 , < bde742b076cbe26ecc89c8c68c76ae076a524d02 (git) Affected: 60b3013cdaf3fa8a17243ca46b19db3cbe08d943 , < 96d47e40bf9db4a9efd5c8fb53287a508d165f14 (git) |
guessed | |
| Linux | Linux |
Affected:
2.6.35
Unaffected: 0 , < 2.6.35 (semver) Unaffected: 5.10.259 , ≤ 5.10.* (semver) Unaffected: 5.15.210 , ≤ 5.15.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.1.176 , ≤ 6.1.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.6.143 , ≤ 6.6.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.12.94 , ≤ 6.12.* (semver) Unaffected: 6.18.36 , ≤ 6.18.* (semver) Unaffected: 7.0.13 , ≤ 7.0.* (semver) Unaffected: 7.1 , ≤ * (original_commit_for_fix) |
guessed | |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 |
cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:10
|
||
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 |
cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:6
|
||
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 |
cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:7
|
||
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 |
cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:8
|
||
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 |
cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:9
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:10"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "kernel",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:6"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "kernel",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "kernel",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "kernel-rt",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "kernel",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "kernel-rt",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "kernel",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "kernel-rt",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A flaw was found in the Linux kernel\u0027s `kl5kusb105` USB serial driver. This buffer overflow vulnerability allows a local attacker to write data beyond the intended memory boundary (if attacker controls USB device or driver, because triggered from the internals of the device). By sending a specially crafted input to the USB serial port, an attacker can trigger an out-of-bounds write, which may lead to memory corruption. The primary consequence of this flaw is a denial of service (DoS), potentially causing system instability or crashes."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"namespace": "https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/",
"value": "Moderate"
},
"type": "Red Hat severity rating"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-787",
"description": "Out-of-bounds Write",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-15T00:44:36.635Z",
"orgId": "0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c",
"shortName": "redhat-SADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53194"
},
{
"name": "RHBZ#2492703",
"tags": [
"issue-tracking",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2492703"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_sadp-csaf-vex"
],
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-53194.json"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Reported to Red Hat."
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-06-25T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Made public."
}
],
"title": "kernel: USB: serial: kl5kusb105: fix bulk-out buffer overflow",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "To mitigate this issue, prevent module kl5kusb105 from being loaded. Please see https://access.redhat.com/solutions/41278 for how to blacklist a kernel module to prevent it from loading automatically."
}
],
"x_adpType": "supplier",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "sadp-cli 1.0.0"
}
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/usb/serial/kl5kusb105.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "60af1fd82983c26604102e63a3fcc822c186cceb",
"status": "affected",
"version": "60b3013cdaf3fa8a17243ca46b19db3cbe08d943",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "0a57320f71941d4e0b1307453c9a1f0939afe666",
"status": "affected",
"version": "60b3013cdaf3fa8a17243ca46b19db3cbe08d943",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "14147b7963685957839c76ba8094924e22777d79",
"status": "affected",
"version": "60b3013cdaf3fa8a17243ca46b19db3cbe08d943",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "a1288cd700f721c1a119c4f1e8efa234e59caada",
"status": "affected",
"version": "60b3013cdaf3fa8a17243ca46b19db3cbe08d943",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "70d86e355c564b5510fde61361df014f5476c83e",
"status": "affected",
"version": "60b3013cdaf3fa8a17243ca46b19db3cbe08d943",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "372f33ebed747d91870f57c0a2e62884a870bffa",
"status": "affected",
"version": "60b3013cdaf3fa8a17243ca46b19db3cbe08d943",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "bde742b076cbe26ecc89c8c68c76ae076a524d02",
"status": "affected",
"version": "60b3013cdaf3fa8a17243ca46b19db3cbe08d943",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "96d47e40bf9db4a9efd5c8fb53287a508d165f14",
"status": "affected",
"version": "60b3013cdaf3fa8a17243ca46b19db3cbe08d943",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/usb/serial/kl5kusb105.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.6.35"
},
{
"lessThan": "2.6.35",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.259",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.210",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.176",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.143",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.12.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.12.94",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.18.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.18.36",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.0.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "7.0.13",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "7.1",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.10.259",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.35",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.210",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.35",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.176",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.35",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.143",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.35",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.12.94",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.35",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.18.36",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.35",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "7.0.13",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.35",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "7.1",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.35",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nUSB: serial: kl5kusb105: fix bulk-out buffer overflow\n\nklsi_105_prepare_write_buffer() is called by the generic write path\nwith the bulk-out buffer and its size (bulk_out_size, 64 bytes). It\nstores a two-byte length header at the start of the buffer and copies\nthe payload from the write fifo starting at buf + KLSI_HDR_LEN, but\npasses the full buffer size as the number of bytes to copy:\n\n count = kfifo_out_locked(\u0026port-\u003ewrite_fifo, buf + KLSI_HDR_LEN,\n size, \u0026port-\u003elock);\n\nWhen the fifo holds at least size bytes, size bytes are copied starting\ntwo bytes into the size-byte buffer, writing KLSI_HDR_LEN bytes past its\nend. Copy at most size - KLSI_HDR_LEN bytes instead, leaving room for\nthe header as safe_serial already does.\n\nWriting bulk_out_size or more bytes to the tty triggers a slab\nout-of-bounds write, observed with KASAN by emulating the device with\ndummy_hcd and raw-gadget:\n\n BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in kfifo_copy_out+0x83/0xc0\n Write of size 64 at addr ffff888112c62202 by task python3\n kfifo_copy_out\n klsi_105_prepare_write_buffer [kl5kusb105]\n usb_serial_generic_write_start [usbserial]\n Allocated by task 139:\n usb_serial_probe [usbserial]\n The buggy address is located 2 bytes inside of allocated 64-byte region\n\nThe out-of-bounds write no longer occurs with this change applied."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 7.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "AV:L - Although this is USB serial code, the vulnerable copy is reached by a local write to the registered /dev/ttyUSB device once a matching adapter is present.\nAC:L - Writing bulk_out_size or more bytes deterministically fills the FIFO and triggers the out-of-bounds copy; no race or attacker-uncontrolled timing is required.\nPR:L - There is no capability or authentication check in the tty/USB-serial write path, but the attacker needs local access to open and write the tty device.\nUI:N - The attacker can trigger the bug directly by writing to the tty device; no separate victim action is required.\nS:U - The corruption occurs within the host kernel and does not cross a VM, IOMMU, or similar security authority boundary.\nC:H - The bug is kernel heap memory corruption, and the overlong bulk-out URB may also expose adjacent heap bytes to the USB device.\nI:H - The attacker controls the data copied past the 64-byte bulk-out buffer, making this an out-of-bounds kernel heap write.\nA:H - The issue was observed as a KASAN slab out-of-bounds write and can reasonably cause kernel memory corruption, oops, or panic."
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-05T12:34:00.760Z",
"orgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"shortName": "Linux"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/60af1fd82983c26604102e63a3fcc822c186cceb"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0a57320f71941d4e0b1307453c9a1f0939afe666"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/14147b7963685957839c76ba8094924e22777d79"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a1288cd700f721c1a119c4f1e8efa234e59caada"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/70d86e355c564b5510fde61361df014f5476c83e"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/372f33ebed747d91870f57c0a2e62884a870bffa"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bde742b076cbe26ecc89c8c68c76ae076a524d02"
},
{
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/96d47e40bf9db4a9efd5c8fb53287a508d165f14"
}
],
"title": "USB: serial: kl5kusb105: fix bulk-out buffer overflow",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "bippy-1.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"assignerShortName": "Linux",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-53194",
"datePublished": "2026-06-25T08:39:05.017Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-06-09T07:44:35.390Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-05T12:34:00.760Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-53194",
"date": "2026-10-06",
"epss": "0.00148",
"percentile": "0.03462"
},
"microsoft_vex": {
"current_release_date": "2026-07-02T14:47:07.000Z",
"cve": "CVE-2026-53194",
"id": "msrc_CVE-2026-53194",
"initial_release_date": "2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "1",
"source": "Microsoft CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "USB: serial: kl5kusb105: fix bulk-out buffer overflow",
"url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/csaf/vex/2026/msrc_cve-2026-53194.json",
"version": "3"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/usb/serial/kl5kusb105.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "60af1fd82983c26604102e63a3fcc822c186cceb",
"status": "affected",
"version": "60b3013cdaf3fa8a17243ca46b19db3cbe08d943",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "0a57320f71941d4e0b1307453c9a1f0939afe666",
"status": "affected",
"version": "60b3013cdaf3fa8a17243ca46b19db3cbe08d943",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "14147b7963685957839c76ba8094924e22777d79",
"status": "affected",
"version": "60b3013cdaf3fa8a17243ca46b19db3cbe08d943",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "a1288cd700f721c1a119c4f1e8efa234e59caada",
"status": "affected",
"version": "60b3013cdaf3fa8a17243ca46b19db3cbe08d943",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "70d86e355c564b5510fde61361df014f5476c83e",
"status": "affected",
"version": "60b3013cdaf3fa8a17243ca46b19db3cbe08d943",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "372f33ebed747d91870f57c0a2e62884a870bffa",
"status": "affected",
"version": "60b3013cdaf3fa8a17243ca46b19db3cbe08d943",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "bde742b076cbe26ecc89c8c68c76ae076a524d02",
"status": "affected",
"version": "60b3013cdaf3fa8a17243ca46b19db3cbe08d943",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "96d47e40bf9db4a9efd5c8fb53287a508d165f14",
"status": "affected",
"version": "60b3013cdaf3fa8a17243ca46b19db3cbe08d943",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/usb/serial/kl5kusb105.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.6.35"
},
{
"lessThan": "2.6.35",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.259",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.210",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.176",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.143",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.12.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.12.94",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.18.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.18.36",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.0.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "7.0.13",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "7.1",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
},
{
"affectedData": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:10"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "kernel",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:6"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "kernel",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "kernel",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "kernel-rt",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "kernel",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "kernel-rt",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "kernel",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "kernel-rt",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
}
],
"source": "0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "7CB9160D-1913-428C-A99E-1DAF6FCF44A7",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.10.259",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.35",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "5E938CDF-D1C4-43D0-98DC-9E11B6B55801",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.210",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.11",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "C4446623-5F2B-4DD8-8666-9FAAC285A757",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.176",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.16",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "9062F1CD-CAD6-4EA2-A73F-C06D4A887B8C",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.143",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.2",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "85421C0C-ABDE-4357-971C-67F9087DE1B9",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.12.94",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.7",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "389025D2-958D-41BD-BD96-70ED1033A9F3",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.18.36",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.13",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "6A64BF9F-3BCA-42FD-98CB-8F03474D2B1E",
"versionEndExcluding": "7.0.13",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.19",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.1:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "B1EF7059-E670-45F4-B422-54C40FA86390",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.1:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "0D38F0BF-A728-4133-A358-D44A2F7EE6D6",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.1:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "EC732D08-5F7B-46D9-B154-E60C7F4F0A97",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.1:rc4:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "E5910A9D-F60A-409A-B486-FE66BFEBA9B9",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.1:rc5:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "81DFF19E-9CF8-49C6-8C36-1E4038622933",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.1:rc6:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "B0E8FC71-3952-444C-83E9-718DBBBEC615",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.1:rc7:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "1039E95A-8CC3-4C88-8FF9-5C08EEB861C9",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nUSB: serial: kl5kusb105: fix bulk-out buffer overflow\n\nklsi_105_prepare_write_buffer() is called by the generic write path\nwith the bulk-out buffer and its size (bulk_out_size, 64 bytes). It\nstores a two-byte length header at the start of the buffer and copies\nthe payload from the write fifo starting at buf + KLSI_HDR_LEN, but\npasses the full buffer size as the number of bytes to copy:\n\n count = kfifo_out_locked(\u0026port-\u003ewrite_fifo, buf + KLSI_HDR_LEN,\n size, \u0026port-\u003elock);\n\nWhen the fifo holds at least size bytes, size bytes are copied starting\ntwo bytes into the size-byte buffer, writing KLSI_HDR_LEN bytes past its\nend. Copy at most size - KLSI_HDR_LEN bytes instead, leaving room for\nthe header as safe_serial already does.\n\nWriting bulk_out_size or more bytes to the tty triggers a slab\nout-of-bounds write, observed with KASAN by emulating the device with\ndummy_hcd and raw-gadget:\n\n BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in kfifo_copy_out+0x83/0xc0\n Write of size 64 at addr ffff888112c62202 by task python3\n kfifo_copy_out\n klsi_105_prepare_write_buffer [kl5kusb105]\n usb_serial_generic_write_start [usbserial]\n Allocated by task 139:\n usb_serial_probe [usbserial]\n The buggy address is located 2 bytes inside of allocated 64-byte region\n\nThe out-of-bounds write no longer occurs with this change applied."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-53194",
"lastModified": "2026-07-15T01:16:30.943",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"type": "Secondary"
},
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.0,
"impactScore": 4.2,
"source": "0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
},
"published": "2026-06-25T09:16:36.850",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0a57320f71941d4e0b1307453c9a1f0939afe666"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/14147b7963685957839c76ba8094924e22777d79"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/372f33ebed747d91870f57c0a2e62884a870bffa"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/60af1fd82983c26604102e63a3fcc822c186cceb"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/70d86e355c564b5510fde61361df014f5476c83e"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/96d47e40bf9db4a9efd5c8fb53287a508d165f14"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a1288cd700f721c1a119c4f1e8efa234e59caada"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bde742b076cbe26ecc89c8c68c76ae076a524d02"
},
{
"source": "0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53194"
},
{
"source": "0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c",
"tags": [
"Issue Tracking",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2492703"
},
{
"source": "0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-53194.json"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-787"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
},
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-787"
}
],
"source": "0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"aggregate_severity": "Moderate",
"current_release_date": "2026-07-01T14:08:18+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2026-53194",
"id": "CVE-2026-53194",
"initial_release_date": "2026-06-25T00:00:00+00:00",
"product_status:known_affected": "260",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "14",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "kernel: USB: serial: kl5kusb105: fix bulk-out buffer overflow",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-53194.json",
"version": "3"
},
"suse_vex": {
"aggregate_severity": "moderate",
"current_release_date": "2026-10-01T00:57:00Z",
"cve": "CVE-2026-53194",
"id": "CVE-2026-53194",
"initial_release_date": "2026-06-26T02:10:30Z",
"product_status:known_affected": "645",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "15",
"product_status:recommended": "287",
"source": "SUSE CSAF VEX",
"status": "interim",
"title": "SUSE CVE CVE-2026-53194",
"url": "https://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/security/csaf-vex/cve-2026-53194.json",
"version": "14"
}
}
}
CERTFR-2026-AVI-1252
Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: 2026-10-02 - Updated: 2026-10-02
De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer une exécution de code arbitraire, une élévation de privilèges et un déni de service à distance.
Solutions
Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).
{
"$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
"affected_systems": [
{
"description": "Ubuntu 16.04 ESM",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 26.04 LTS",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 20.04 ESM",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 24.04 LTS",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 18.04 ESM",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 14.04 ESM",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
},
{
"description": "Ubuntu 22.04 LTS",
"product": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"vendor": {
"name": "Ubuntu",
"scada": false
}
}
}
],
"affected_systems_content": "",
"content": "## Solutions\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).",
"cves": [
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72436",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72436"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64353",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64353"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64214",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64214"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64046",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64046"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-68459",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68459"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64376",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64376"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64186",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64186"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53192",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53192"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64590",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64590"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53230",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53230"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53398",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53398"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53349",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53349"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53038",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53038"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53381",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53381"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64270",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64270"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53132",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53132"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64275",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64275"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64274",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64274"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-74394",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74394"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64485",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64485"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46211",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46211"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53272",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53272"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53179",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53179"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63864",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63864"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64067",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64067"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-74439",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74439"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63854",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63854"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64192",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64192"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53350",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53350"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52957",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52957"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53116",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53116"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53214",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53214"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46307",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46307"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46130",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46130"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64452",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64452"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53210",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53210"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64492",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64492"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64483",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64483"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52968",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52968"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64322",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64322"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53061",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53061"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53292",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53292"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64470",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64470"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64172",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64172"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53364",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53364"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64461",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64461"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64501",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64501"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53374",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53374"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53274",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53274"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53202",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53202"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63966",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63966"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64513",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64513"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64413",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64413"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63841",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63841"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-68088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64388",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64388"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53117",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53117"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64512",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64512"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63882",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63882"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53128",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53128"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64409",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64409"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53320",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53320"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53218",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53218"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46134",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46134"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64367",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64367"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64516",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64516"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64380",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64380"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64268",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64268"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64023",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64023"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53378",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53378"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53169",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53169"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64179",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64179"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64489",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64489"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64510",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64510"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64480",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64480"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64399",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64399"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72494",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72494"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-80665",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-80665"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-74376",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74376"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53271",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53271"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63852",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63852"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53109",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53109"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53367",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53367"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64385",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64385"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64405",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64405"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72130",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72130"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53140",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53140"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53297",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53297"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63818",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63818"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46319",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46319"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64414",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64414"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43492",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43492"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64502",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64502"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64454",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64454"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31486",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31486"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64531",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64531"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63993",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63993"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64308",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64308"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64407",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64407"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63832",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63832"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46227"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53305",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53305"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64402",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64402"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64527",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64527"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63807",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63807"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63839",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63839"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64151",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64151"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53399",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53399"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53400",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53400"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63886",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63886"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64045",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64045"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64221",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64221"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53106",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53106"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64365",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64365"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46298",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46298"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53260",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53260"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64128",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64128"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53278",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53278"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72320",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72320"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46196",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46196"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46170",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46170"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64132",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64132"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53138",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53138"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64241",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64241"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63830",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63830"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64256",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64256"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64319",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64319"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53391",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53391"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-74345",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74345"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53370",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53370"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64591",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64591"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64333",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64333"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53291",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53291"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52924",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52924"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53227"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64404",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64404"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64467",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64467"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53239",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53239"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53029",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53029"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63879",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63879"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53342",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53342"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46233",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46233"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64424",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64424"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64389",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64389"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46117",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46117"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64246",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64246"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-71289",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71289"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46140",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46140"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64326",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64326"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53373",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53373"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63933",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63933"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-74401",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74401"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46303",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46303"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46114",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46114"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63870",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63870"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64386",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64386"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72319",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72319"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53331",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53331"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64460",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64460"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53365",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53365"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64514",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64514"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63821",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63821"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-68091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64260",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64260"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63805",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63805"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64279",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64279"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53360",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53360"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46141",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46141"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52993",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52993"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64383",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64383"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63847",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63847"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64337",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64337"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63888",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63888"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64430",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64430"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-68083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64162",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64162"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64459",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64459"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52943",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52943"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63896",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63896"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64295",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64295"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-68089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72466",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72466"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43496",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43496"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64592",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64592"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52915",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52915"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64177",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64177"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64497",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64497"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53163",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53163"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46173",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46173"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64258",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64258"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-68090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46204",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46204"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46214",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46214"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53146",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53146"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63956",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63956"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64599",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64599"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-68461",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68461"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64189",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64189"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72339",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72339"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63798",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63798"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46182",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46182"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63845",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63845"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64598",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64598"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53313",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53313"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64230",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64230"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53345",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53345"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53205",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53205"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63810",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63810"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63801",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63801"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63815",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63815"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63827",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63827"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64451",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64451"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63842",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63842"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46158",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46158"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-74267",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74267"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63929",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63929"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64226",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64226"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64146",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64146"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53397",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53397"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53309",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53309"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-68457",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68457"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72366",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72366"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46320",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46320"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64276",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64276"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64475",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64475"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64508",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64508"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64323",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64323"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64438",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64438"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46137",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46137"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45841",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45841"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53102",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53102"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64271",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64271"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53150",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53150"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53327",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53327"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63913",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63913"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64038",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64038"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64462",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64462"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63925",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63925"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53147",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53147"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46159",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46159"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64455",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64455"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46190",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46190"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46331",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46331"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53051",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53051"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46142",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46142"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64421",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64421"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64302",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64302"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72299",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72299"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64445",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64445"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64328",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64328"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72417",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72417"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53013",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53013"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53317",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53317"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53200",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53200"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64433",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64433"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53054",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53054"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64165",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64165"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64272",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64272"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-23469",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23469"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72278",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72278"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52995",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52995"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53257",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53257"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46209",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46209"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52931",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52931"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53338",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53338"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64253",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64253"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64213",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64213"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-68476",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68476"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-68477",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68477"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64500",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64500"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53094",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53094"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63806",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63806"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53047",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53047"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53368",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53368"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64239",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64239"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64097",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64097"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72351",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72351"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63816",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63816"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64330",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64330"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53330",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53330"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72277",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72277"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46186",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46186"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64348",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64348"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53383",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53383"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64469",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64469"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53348",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53348"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46169",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46169"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-74361",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74361"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64310",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64310"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53006",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53006"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64280",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64280"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63880",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63880"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64362",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64362"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64327",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64327"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64415",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64415"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53324",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53324"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63989",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63989"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64289",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64289"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64523",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64523"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63800",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63800"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64102",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64102"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64255",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64255"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64071",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64071"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64314",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64314"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63863",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63863"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53377",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53377"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64486",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64486"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64267",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64267"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53028",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53028"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53312",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53312"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64517",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64517"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64341",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64341"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46106",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46106"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31420",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31420"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63817",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63817"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64446",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64446"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53339",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53339"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64534",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64534"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53266",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53266"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64338",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64338"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64083"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64169",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64169"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53149",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53149"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63795",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63795"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46116",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46116"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64106",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64106"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64418",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64418"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64249",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64249"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72222",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72222"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64536",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64536"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46203",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46203"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53048",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53048"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63873",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63873"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63892",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63892"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63850",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63850"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53172",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53172"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46151",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46151"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64010",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64010"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64364",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64364"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63947",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63947"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-38724",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38724"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64243",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64243"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46220",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46220"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53315",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53315"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64163",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64163"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64050",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64050"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63975",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63975"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53233",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53233"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63859",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63859"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53114",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53114"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53402",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53402"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64351",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64351"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64051",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64051"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53046",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53046"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63835",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63835"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53050",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53050"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64432",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64432"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46176",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46176"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46146",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46146"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46318",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46318"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53386",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53386"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64293",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64293"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64039",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64039"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63855",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63855"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-68087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63833",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63833"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45846",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45846"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63796",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63796"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53332",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53332"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64363",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64363"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46174",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46174"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43495",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43495"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53401",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53401"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53334",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53334"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64263",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64263"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64061",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64061"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53353",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53353"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64375",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64375"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64040",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64040"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46308",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46308"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53335",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53335"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64370",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64370"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64150",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64150"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53178",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53178"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53389",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53389"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64439",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64439"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53110",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53110"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72322",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72322"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64593",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64593"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64254",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64254"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64231",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64231"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46122",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46122"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53158",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53158"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64210",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64210"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64091",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64091"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46241",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46241"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64299",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64299"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63865",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63865"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64052",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64052"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72422",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72422"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64374",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64374"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46181",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46181"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64357",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64357"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64488",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64488"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46213",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46213"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64603",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64603"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64109",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64109"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53190",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53190"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64345",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64345"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46226",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46226"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64368",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64368"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53251",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53251"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64518",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64518"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53249",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53249"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64166",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64166"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53329",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53329"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46189",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46189"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53139",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53139"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53382",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53382"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64504",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64504"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46315",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46315"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63875",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63875"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63898",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63898"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53276",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53276"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53262",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53262"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53346",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53346"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64090",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64090"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53130",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53130"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46128",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46128"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72495",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72495"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63813",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63813"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64320",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64320"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46317",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46317"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64155",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64155"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64398",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64398"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64147",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64147"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64464",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64464"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64297",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64297"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72317",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72317"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72137",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72137"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46242",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46242"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53065",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53065"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63996",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63996"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-68092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64343",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64343"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46293",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46293"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64473",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64473"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64021",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64021"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64397",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64397"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64152",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64152"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46197",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46197"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52952",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52952"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63984",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63984"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53361",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53361"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64371",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64371"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64520",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64520"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64167",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64167"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64471",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64471"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53225",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53225"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64468",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64468"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53294",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53294"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53222",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53222"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64449",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64449"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63866",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63866"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64602",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64602"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46243",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46243"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53283",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53283"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63884",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63884"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64551",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64551"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72472",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72472"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53362",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53362"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64410",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64410"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64212",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64212"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53173",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53173"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64528",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64528"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53053",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53053"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46295",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46295"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53403",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53403"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63871",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63871"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64048",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64048"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53209",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53209"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52992",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52992"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63797",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63797"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63987",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63987"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64456",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64456"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72491",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72491"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63858",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63858"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64170",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64170"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46206",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46206"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72393",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72393"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52979",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52979"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64100",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64100"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53371",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53371"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64306",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64306"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64465",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64465"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64313",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64313"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52965",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52965"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53067",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53067"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52988",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52988"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46297",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46297"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53157",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53157"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64112",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64112"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-10263",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-10263"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53135",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53135"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-74434",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74434"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63853",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63853"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64442",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64442"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46302",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46302"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53333",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53333"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64477",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64477"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64463",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64463"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64401",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64401"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53392",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53392"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64259",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64259"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64018",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64018"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53099",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53099"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46109",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46109"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53279",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53279"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64541",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64541"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63916",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63916"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64332",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64332"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53170",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53170"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46108",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46108"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53167",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53167"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64191",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64191"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64458",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64458"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64476",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64476"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64027",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64027"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64378",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64378"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53076",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53076"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72323",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72323"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72065",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72065"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46289",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46289"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64318",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64318"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64521",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64521"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64300",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64300"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72398",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72398"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63861",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63861"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63794",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63794"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53018",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53018"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64394",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64394"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-74398",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74398"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53237",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53237"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-80591",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-80591"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53302",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53302"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53186",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53186"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53340",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53340"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53182",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53182"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53177",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53177"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53208",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53208"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64055",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64055"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53255",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53255"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53207",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53207"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53375",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53375"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46150",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46150"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53314",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53314"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53123",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53123"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53347",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53347"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53126",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53126"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53187",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53187"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64060",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64060"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46228",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46228"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53311",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53311"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64228",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64228"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52950",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52950"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72355",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72355"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-74384",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74384"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63970",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63970"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53245",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53245"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53195",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53195"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64309",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64309"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64173",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64173"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53043",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53043"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63824",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63824"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72139",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72139"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53171",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53171"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63914",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63914"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46172",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46172"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63935",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63935"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64556",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64556"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63825",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63825"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46311",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46311"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-74433",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74433"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53164",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53164"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72463",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72463"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63874",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63874"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53285",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53285"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64224",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64224"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63901",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63901"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64435",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64435"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64336",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64336"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63951",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63951"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53189",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53189"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64352",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64352"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72318",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72318"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64474",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64474"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64115",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64115"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46110",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46110"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64356",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64356"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63867",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63867"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64031",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64031"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53059",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53059"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53133",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53133"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64377",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64377"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53204",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53204"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64164",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64164"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63918",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63918"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64346",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64346"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53351",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53351"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53024",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53024"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53307",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53307"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64522",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64522"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53344",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53344"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53263",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53263"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63891",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63891"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63945",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63945"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52932",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52932"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63822",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63822"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72329",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72329"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-74310",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74310"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72041",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72041"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64187",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64187"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64342",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64342"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46104",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46104"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64392",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64392"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64360",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64360"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46179",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46179"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64096",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64096"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63985",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63985"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63848",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63848"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64478",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64478"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64140",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64140"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53152",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53152"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53356",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53356"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63799",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63799"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64472",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64472"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63968",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63968"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64035",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64035"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43498",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43498"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46291",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46291"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64335",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64335"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46215",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46215"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53228",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53228"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63906",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63906"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72399",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72399"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63877",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63877"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64301",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64301"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64315",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64315"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53073",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53073"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46312",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46312"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64395",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64395"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64273",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64273"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53259",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53259"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63828",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63828"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63904",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63904"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53031",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53031"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72226",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72226"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63820",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63820"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64262",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64262"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46156",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46156"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64142",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64142"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64211",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64211"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53336",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53336"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64139",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64139"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46294",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46294"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46125",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46125"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72348",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72348"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46152",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46152"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46290",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46290"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64509",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64509"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52980",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52980"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64117",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64117"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64079",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64079"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53194",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53194"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64307",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64307"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64036",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64036"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53242",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53242"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53293",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53293"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53248",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53248"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46135",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46135"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53341",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53341"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52910",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52910"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53206",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53206"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64339",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64339"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64108",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64108"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64529",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64529"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53388",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53388"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63937",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63937"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46167",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46167"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63804",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63804"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64305",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64305"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64119",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64119"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53212",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53212"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53137",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53137"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46139",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46139"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64175",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64175"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72429",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72429"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64400",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64400"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72248",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72248"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64381",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64381"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64066",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64066"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46191",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46191"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64604",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64604"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53393",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53393"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52978",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52978"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53337",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53337"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64597",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64597"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53310",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53310"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64095",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64095"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63887",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63887"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53199",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53199"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64496",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64496"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64251",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64251"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53025",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53025"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64113",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64113"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64387",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64387"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53008",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53008"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46192",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46192"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52938",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52938"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63972",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63972"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64103",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64103"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46105",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46105"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46274",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46274"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63849",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63849"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64408",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64408"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63900",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63900"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64136",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64136"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53165",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53165"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64227",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64227"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53197",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53197"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64481",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64481"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53042",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53042"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53258",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53258"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64316",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64316"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53289",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53289"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64208",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64208"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64174",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64174"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2025-54518",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-54518"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63897",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63897"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64417",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64417"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53376",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53376"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53268",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53268"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64457",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64457"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46313",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46313"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63819",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63819"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53241",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53241"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53223",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53223"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64423",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64423"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46309",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46309"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64034",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64034"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64443",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64443"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46244",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46244"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53159",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53159"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64588",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64588"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53298",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53298"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64229",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64229"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53372",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53372"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53039",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53039"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63868",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63868"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53290",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53290"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64269",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64269"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53080",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53080"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43490",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43490"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53316",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53316"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53267",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53267"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53004",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53004"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72296",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72296"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63955",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63955"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64101",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64101"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64482",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64482"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64218",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64218"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52976",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52976"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46292",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46292"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64495",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64495"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53221",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53221"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63811",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63811"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63991",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63991"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64282",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64282"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53275",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53275"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52920",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52920"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64366",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64366"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53001",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53001"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64594",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64594"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64278",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64278"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63960",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63960"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64396",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64396"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53203",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53203"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52911",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52911"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53295",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53295"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53269",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53269"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64235",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64235"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64479",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64479"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63963",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63963"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63890",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63890"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64324",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64324"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64329",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64329"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45843",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45843"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46115",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46115"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64373",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64373"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63997",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63997"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46148",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46148"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46136",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46136"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64219",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64219"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64277",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64277"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53357",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53357"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46324",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46324"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53052",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53052"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53318",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53318"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64070",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64070"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46316",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46316"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64126",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64126"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53280",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53280"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53136",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53136"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64503",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64503"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53215",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53215"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53108",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53108"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46230",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46230"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72381",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72381"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64161",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64161"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63881",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63881"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52964",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52964"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46138",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46138"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53216",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53216"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-74350",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74350"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72496",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72496"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64291",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64291"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53226",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53226"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53089",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53089"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63809",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63809"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53253",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53253"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53250",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53250"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64453",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64453"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53003",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53003"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53394",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53394"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46225",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46225"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64436",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64436"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64403",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64403"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52948",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52948"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64222",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64222"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64121",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64121"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63939",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63939"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63836",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63836"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63814",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63814"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64053",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64053"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63936",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63936"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53252",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53252"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64216",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64216"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63927",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63927"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64412",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64412"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53355",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53355"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46314",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46314"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64188",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64188"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46149",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46149"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64491",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64491"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-74287",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74287"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53017",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53017"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64144",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64144"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64487",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64487"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64391",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64391"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64303",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64303"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46208",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46208"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63971",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63971"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53174",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53174"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64086",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64086"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64429",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64429"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64344",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64344"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53134",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53134"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63831",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63831"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46205",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46205"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64286",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64286"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72412",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72412"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64292",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64292"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53359",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53359"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64029",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64029"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53016",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53016"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46218",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46218"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63919",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63919"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53077",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53077"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64350",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64350"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64321",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64321"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46132",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46132"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72473",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72473"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64111",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64111"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64447",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64447"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46160",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46160"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46177",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46177"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46131",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46131"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64149",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64149"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53256",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53256"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72014",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72014"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64411",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64411"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63876",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63876"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53306",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53306"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53235",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53235"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53129",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53129"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53396",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53396"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53277",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53277"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63998",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63998"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64137",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64137"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53115",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53115"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64043",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64043"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53308",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53308"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53045",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53045"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72249",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72249"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63862",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63862"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63954",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63954"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53282",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53282"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63840",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63840"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46306",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46306"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64242",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64242"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64334",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64334"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64049",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64049"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46210",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46210"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53384",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53384"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53155",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53155"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72442",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72442"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64183",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64183"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64448",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64448"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72493",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72493"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72221",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72221"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72289",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72289"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72251",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72251"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46162",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46162"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53319",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53319"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64347",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64347"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63826",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63826"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52959",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52959"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53120",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53120"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64393",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64393"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64134",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64134"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53026",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53026"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64005",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64005"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64466",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64466"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64419",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64419"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46107",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46107"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64524",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64524"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46273",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46273"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63981",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63981"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43502",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43502"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53270",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53270"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53379",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53379"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53198",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53198"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64382",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64382"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64589",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64589"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63946",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63946"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63903",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63903"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64372",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64372"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64490",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64490"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52909",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52909"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64236",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64236"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63922",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63922"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64283",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64283"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53395",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53395"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63949",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63949"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46163",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46163"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64444",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64444"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46202",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46202"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64233",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64233"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46164",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46164"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46235",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46235"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64225",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64225"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64331",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64331"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64511",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64511"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63907",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63907"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45838",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45838"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64361",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64361"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64209",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64209"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64182",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64182"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53264",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53264"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63999",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63999"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53023",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53023"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53142",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53142"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53098",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53098"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-43497",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-43497"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64369",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64369"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53175",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53175"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64024",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64024"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64215",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64215"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63944",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63944"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53273",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53273"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64054",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64054"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53184",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53184"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-31560",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31560"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64056",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64056"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52962",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52962"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63860",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63860"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64265",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64265"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52953",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52953"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64494",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64494"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53093",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53093"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63899",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63899"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-74268",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74268"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46200",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46200"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72451",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72451"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53144",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53144"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64033",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64033"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63893",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63893"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64124",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64124"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46222",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46222"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46187",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46187"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53385",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53385"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46168",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46168"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53075",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53075"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53246",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53246"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64245",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64245"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72279",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72279"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53326",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53326"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64240",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64240"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63823",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63823"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46175",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46175"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53325",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53325"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53323",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53323"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72501",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72501"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64354",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64354"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53030",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53030"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64206",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64206"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64530",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64530"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64015",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64015"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64110",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64110"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46299",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46299"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64294",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64294"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63851",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63851"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63934",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63934"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53303",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53303"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46239",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46239"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53299",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53299"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53055",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53055"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64285",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64285"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64123",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64123"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53019",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53019"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46201",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46201"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64156",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64156"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53363",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53363"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-74436",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74436"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52991",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52991"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53322",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53322"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64122",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64122"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63808",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63808"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53191",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53191"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72217",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72217"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64493",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64493"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53100",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53100"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46221",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46221"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52940",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52940"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53358",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53358"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63905",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63905"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64535",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64535"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63973",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63973"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63857",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63857"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46144",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46144"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63837",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63837"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63895",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63895"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53352",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53352"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53151",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53151"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64416",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64416"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72234",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72234"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64157",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64157"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64247",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64247"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64379",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64379"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53254",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53254"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53078",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53078"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52928",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52928"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64420",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64420"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64138",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64138"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64153",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64153"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53180",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53180"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53037",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53037"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63986",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63986"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64205",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64205"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46305",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46305"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53072",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53072"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53284",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53284"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52921",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52921"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53281",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53281"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53068",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53068"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64012",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64012"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52967",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52967"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46304",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46304"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64118",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64118"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46166",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46166"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64058",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64058"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64325",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64325"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-74427",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74427"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53213",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53213"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64525",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64525"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64596",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64596"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53387",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53387"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64384",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64384"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64037",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64037"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-68084",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68084"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63912",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63912"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64425",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64425"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64600",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64600"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52983",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52983"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46216",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46216"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-74406",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74406"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52930",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52930"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63942",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63942"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64064",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64064"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64116",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64116"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64312",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64312"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46275",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46275"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-68460",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-68460"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63889",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63889"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46126",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46126"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46193",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46193"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64526",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64526"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64428",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64428"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64505",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64505"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53057",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53057"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64426",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64426"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52974",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52974"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64507",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64507"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53127",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53127"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63941",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63941"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53366",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53366"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46143",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46143"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52923",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52923"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64087",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64087"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63958",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63958"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46212",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46212"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64499",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64499"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45834",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45834"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63856",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63856"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-74584",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74584"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64358",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64358"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64355",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64355"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46199",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46199"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64515",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64515"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64130",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64130"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72069",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72069"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64044",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64044"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64290",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64290"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64185",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64185"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64422",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64422"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64519",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64519"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72020",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72020"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53122",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53122"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53196",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53196"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63878",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63878"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46310",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46310"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46123",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46123"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64340",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64340"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64092",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64092"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53000",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53000"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64007",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64007"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64450",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64450"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46207",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46207"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53156",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53156"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64484",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64484"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53300",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53300"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64298",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64298"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52969",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52969"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46157",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46157"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64207",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64207"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63994",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63994"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53062",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53062"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52990",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52990"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64114",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64114"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64390",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64390"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53390",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53390"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-74255",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74255"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72191",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72191"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64266",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64266"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53380",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53380"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53032",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53032"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46232",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46232"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53211",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53211"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64159",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64159"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64088",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64088"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46165",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46165"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64073",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64073"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64441",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64441"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53369",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53369"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53162",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53162"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53343",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53343"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-74269",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74269"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53082",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53082"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52926",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52926"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63908",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63908"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64145",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64145"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63829",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63829"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72192",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72192"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64002",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64002"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63894",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63894"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46238",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46238"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72288",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72288"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64081",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64081"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64135",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64135"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63844",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63844"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64440",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64440"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64063",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64063"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52977",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52977"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63803",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63803"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46155",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46155"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52917",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52917"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64601",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64601"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53074",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53074"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63961",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63961"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64154",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64154"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-46322",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-46322"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53036",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53036"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-45839",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45839"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72477",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72477"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72046",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72046"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53261",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53261"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64065",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64065"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-72085",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-72085"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-52982",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52982"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-74428",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74428"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63902",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63902"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64011",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64011"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64359",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64359"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63846",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63846"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64317",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64317"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53328",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53328"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-64009",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64009"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53022",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53022"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63883",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63883"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63802",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63802"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-63869",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63869"
},
{
"name": "CVE-2026-53083",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53083"
}
],
"initial_release_date": "2026-10-02T00:00:00",
"last_revision_date": "2026-10-02T00:00:00",
"links": [],
"reference": "CERTFR-2026-AVI-1252",
"revisions": [
{
"description": "Version initiale",
"revision_date": "2026-10-02T00:00:00.000000"
}
],
"risks": [
{
"description": "D\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 l\u0027int\u00e9grit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire"
},
{
"description": "Non sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9 par l\u0027\u00e9diteur"
},
{
"description": "Contournement de la politique de s\u00e9curit\u00e9"
},
{
"description": "Atteinte \u00e0 la confidentialit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es"
},
{
"description": "\u00c9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges"
}
],
"summary": "De multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s ont \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9couvertes dans le noyau Linux d\u0027Ubuntu. Certaines d\u0027entre elles permettent \u00e0 un attaquant de provoquer une ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire, une \u00e9l\u00e9vation de privil\u00e8ges et un d\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance.",
"title": "Multiples vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans le noyau Linux d\u0027Ubuntu",
"vendor_advisories": [
{
"published_at": "2026-10-02",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8816-4",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8816-4"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-09-24",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8819-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8819-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-09-30",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8849-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8849-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-09-29",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8816-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8816-2"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-09-30",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8816-3",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8816-3"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-09-30",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8819-4",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8819-4"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-09-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8819-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8819-2"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-09-29",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8842-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8842-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-10-02",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8818-6",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8818-6"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-09-30",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8730-7",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8730-7"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-09-29",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8728-3",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8728-3"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-09-30",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8817-3",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8817-3"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-09-29",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8729-6",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8729-6"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-09-29",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8819-3",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8819-3"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-09-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8818-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8818-2"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-09-30",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8850-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8850-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-09-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8730-6",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8730-6"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-09-30",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8818-5",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8818-5"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-10-02",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8851-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8851-2"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-09-29",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8818-3",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8818-3"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-10-02",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8864-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8864-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-09-30",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8817-2",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8817-2"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-09-30",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8818-4",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8818-4"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-09-30",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8851-1",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8851-1"
},
{
"published_at": "2026-09-25",
"title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Ubuntu USN-8729-5",
"url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8729-5"
}
]
}
FKIE_CVE-2026-53194
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-06-25 09:16 - Updated: 2026-07-15 01:165.3 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/
| URL | Tags | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0a57320f71941d4e0b1307453c9a1f0939afe666 | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/14147b7963685957839c76ba8094924e22777d79 | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/372f33ebed747d91870f57c0a2e62884a870bffa | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/60af1fd82983c26604102e63a3fcc822c186cceb | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/70d86e355c564b5510fde61361df014f5476c83e | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/96d47e40bf9db4a9efd5c8fb53287a508d165f14 | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a1288cd700f721c1a119c4f1e8efa234e59caada | Patch | |
| 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bde742b076cbe26ecc89c8c68c76ae076a524d02 | Patch | |
| 0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c | https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53194 | Third Party Advisory | |
| 0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c | https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2492703 | Issue Tracking, Third Party Advisory | |
| 0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c | https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-53194.json | Third Party Advisory |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 7.1 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 7.1 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 7.1 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 7.1 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 7.1 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 7.1 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 7.1 |
{
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/usb/serial/kl5kusb105.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "60af1fd82983c26604102e63a3fcc822c186cceb",
"status": "affected",
"version": "60b3013cdaf3fa8a17243ca46b19db3cbe08d943",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "0a57320f71941d4e0b1307453c9a1f0939afe666",
"status": "affected",
"version": "60b3013cdaf3fa8a17243ca46b19db3cbe08d943",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "14147b7963685957839c76ba8094924e22777d79",
"status": "affected",
"version": "60b3013cdaf3fa8a17243ca46b19db3cbe08d943",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "a1288cd700f721c1a119c4f1e8efa234e59caada",
"status": "affected",
"version": "60b3013cdaf3fa8a17243ca46b19db3cbe08d943",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "70d86e355c564b5510fde61361df014f5476c83e",
"status": "affected",
"version": "60b3013cdaf3fa8a17243ca46b19db3cbe08d943",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "372f33ebed747d91870f57c0a2e62884a870bffa",
"status": "affected",
"version": "60b3013cdaf3fa8a17243ca46b19db3cbe08d943",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "bde742b076cbe26ecc89c8c68c76ae076a524d02",
"status": "affected",
"version": "60b3013cdaf3fa8a17243ca46b19db3cbe08d943",
"versionType": "git"
},
{
"lessThan": "96d47e40bf9db4a9efd5c8fb53287a508d165f14",
"status": "affected",
"version": "60b3013cdaf3fa8a17243ca46b19db3cbe08d943",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "Linux",
"programFiles": [
"drivers/usb/serial/kl5kusb105.c"
],
"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git",
"vendor": "Linux",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.6.35"
},
{
"lessThan": "2.6.35",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.10.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.10.259",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.15.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "5.15.210",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.1.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.1.176",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.6.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.6.143",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.12.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.12.94",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "6.18.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "6.18.36",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "7.0.*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "7.0.13",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "7.1",
"versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"
}
]
}
],
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"
},
{
"affectedData": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:10"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "kernel",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:6"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "kernel",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "kernel",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "kernel-rt",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "kernel",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "kernel-rt",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "kernel",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "kernel-rt",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
}
],
"source": "0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "7CB9160D-1913-428C-A99E-1DAF6FCF44A7",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.10.259",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.6.35",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "5E938CDF-D1C4-43D0-98DC-9E11B6B55801",
"versionEndExcluding": "5.15.210",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.11",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "C4446623-5F2B-4DD8-8666-9FAAC285A757",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.1.176",
"versionStartIncluding": "5.16",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "9062F1CD-CAD6-4EA2-A73F-C06D4A887B8C",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.6.143",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.2",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "85421C0C-ABDE-4357-971C-67F9087DE1B9",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.12.94",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.7",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "389025D2-958D-41BD-BD96-70ED1033A9F3",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.18.36",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.13",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "6A64BF9F-3BCA-42FD-98CB-8F03474D2B1E",
"versionEndExcluding": "7.0.13",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.19",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.1:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "B1EF7059-E670-45F4-B422-54C40FA86390",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.1:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "0D38F0BF-A728-4133-A358-D44A2F7EE6D6",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.1:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "EC732D08-5F7B-46D9-B154-E60C7F4F0A97",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.1:rc4:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "E5910A9D-F60A-409A-B486-FE66BFEBA9B9",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.1:rc5:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "81DFF19E-9CF8-49C6-8C36-1E4038622933",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.1:rc6:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "B0E8FC71-3952-444C-83E9-718DBBBEC615",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.1:rc7:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "1039E95A-8CC3-4C88-8FF9-5C08EEB861C9",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nUSB: serial: kl5kusb105: fix bulk-out buffer overflow\n\nklsi_105_prepare_write_buffer() is called by the generic write path\nwith the bulk-out buffer and its size (bulk_out_size, 64 bytes). It\nstores a two-byte length header at the start of the buffer and copies\nthe payload from the write fifo starting at buf + KLSI_HDR_LEN, but\npasses the full buffer size as the number of bytes to copy:\n\n count = kfifo_out_locked(\u0026port-\u003ewrite_fifo, buf + KLSI_HDR_LEN,\n size, \u0026port-\u003elock);\n\nWhen the fifo holds at least size bytes, size bytes are copied starting\ntwo bytes into the size-byte buffer, writing KLSI_HDR_LEN bytes past its\nend. Copy at most size - KLSI_HDR_LEN bytes instead, leaving room for\nthe header as safe_serial already does.\n\nWriting bulk_out_size or more bytes to the tty triggers a slab\nout-of-bounds write, observed with KASAN by emulating the device with\ndummy_hcd and raw-gadget:\n\n BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in kfifo_copy_out+0x83/0xc0\n Write of size 64 at addr ffff888112c62202 by task python3\n kfifo_copy_out\n klsi_105_prepare_write_buffer [kl5kusb105]\n usb_serial_generic_write_start [usbserial]\n Allocated by task 139:\n usb_serial_probe [usbserial]\n The buggy address is located 2 bytes inside of allocated 64-byte region\n\nThe out-of-bounds write no longer occurs with this change applied."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-53194",
"lastModified": "2026-07-15T01:16:30.943",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"type": "Secondary"
},
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.0,
"impactScore": 4.2,
"source": "0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
},
"published": "2026-06-25T09:16:36.850",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0a57320f71941d4e0b1307453c9a1f0939afe666"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/14147b7963685957839c76ba8094924e22777d79"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/372f33ebed747d91870f57c0a2e62884a870bffa"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/60af1fd82983c26604102e63a3fcc822c186cceb"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/70d86e355c564b5510fde61361df014f5476c83e"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/96d47e40bf9db4a9efd5c8fb53287a508d165f14"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a1288cd700f721c1a119c4f1e8efa234e59caada"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bde742b076cbe26ecc89c8c68c76ae076a524d02"
},
{
"source": "0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53194"
},
{
"source": "0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c",
"tags": [
"Issue Tracking",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2492703"
},
{
"source": "0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-53194.json"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-787"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
},
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-787"
}
],
"source": "0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
GHSA-WWC5-7R8X-52GG
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-25 09:31 – Updated: 2026-06-30 03:37In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
USB: serial: kl5kusb105: fix bulk-out buffer overflow
klsi_105_prepare_write_buffer() is called by the generic write path with the bulk-out buffer and its size (bulk_out_size, 64 bytes). It stores a two-byte length header at the start of the buffer and copies the payload from the write fifo starting at buf + KLSI_HDR_LEN, but passes the full buffer size as the number of bytes to copy:
count = kfifo_out_locked(&port->write_fifo, buf + KLSI_HDR_LEN, size, &port->lock);
When the fifo holds at least size bytes, size bytes are copied starting two bytes into the size-byte buffer, writing KLSI_HDR_LEN bytes past its end. Copy at most size - KLSI_HDR_LEN bytes instead, leaving room for the header as safe_serial already does.
Writing bulk_out_size or more bytes to the tty triggers a slab out-of-bounds write, observed with KASAN by emulating the device with dummy_hcd and raw-gadget:
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in kfifo_copy_out+0x83/0xc0 Write of size 64 at addr ffff888112c62202 by task python3 kfifo_copy_out klsi_105_prepare_write_buffer [kl5kusb105] usb_serial_generic_write_start [usbserial] Allocated by task 139: usb_serial_probe [usbserial] The buggy address is located 2 bytes inside of allocated 64-byte region
The out-of-bounds write no longer occurs with this change applied.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-53194"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-787"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-25T09:16:36Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nUSB: serial: kl5kusb105: fix bulk-out buffer overflow\n\nklsi_105_prepare_write_buffer() is called by the generic write path\nwith the bulk-out buffer and its size (bulk_out_size, 64 bytes). It\nstores a two-byte length header at the start of the buffer and copies\nthe payload from the write fifo starting at buf + KLSI_HDR_LEN, but\npasses the full buffer size as the number of bytes to copy:\n\n count = kfifo_out_locked(\u0026port-\u003ewrite_fifo, buf + KLSI_HDR_LEN,\n size, \u0026port-\u003elock);\n\nWhen the fifo holds at least size bytes, size bytes are copied starting\ntwo bytes into the size-byte buffer, writing KLSI_HDR_LEN bytes past its\nend. Copy at most size - KLSI_HDR_LEN bytes instead, leaving room for\nthe header as safe_serial already does.\n\nWriting bulk_out_size or more bytes to the tty triggers a slab\nout-of-bounds write, observed with KASAN by emulating the device with\ndummy_hcd and raw-gadget:\n\n BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in kfifo_copy_out+0x83/0xc0\n Write of size 64 at addr ffff888112c62202 by task python3\n kfifo_copy_out\n klsi_105_prepare_write_buffer [kl5kusb105]\n usb_serial_generic_write_start [usbserial]\n Allocated by task 139:\n usb_serial_probe [usbserial]\n The buggy address is located 2 bytes inside of allocated 64-byte region\n\nThe out-of-bounds write no longer occurs with this change applied.",
"id": "GHSA-wwc5-7r8x-52gg",
"modified": "2026-06-30T03:37:13Z",
"published": "2026-06-25T09:31:20Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53194"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53194"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2492703"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0a57320f71941d4e0b1307453c9a1f0939afe666"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/14147b7963685957839c76ba8094924e22777d79"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/372f33ebed747d91870f57c0a2e62884a870bffa"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/60af1fd82983c26604102e63a3fcc822c186cceb"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/70d86e355c564b5510fde61361df014f5476c83e"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/96d47e40bf9db4a9efd5c8fb53287a508d165f14"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a1288cd700f721c1a119c4f1e8efa234e59caada"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bde742b076cbe26ecc89c8c68c76ae076a524d02"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-53194.json"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
MSRC_CVE-2026-53194
Vulnerability from csaf_microsoft - Published: 2026-06-02 00:00 - Updated: 2026-07-02 14:47OESA-2026-2929 (CVE-2026-52923)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2026-07-09 11:11 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:11 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipc: limit next_id allocation to the valid ID range
The checkpoint/restore sysctl path can request the next SysV IPC id through ids->next_id. ipc_idr_alloc() currently forwards that request to idr_alloc() with an open-ended upper bound.
If the valid tail of the SysV IPC id space is full, the allocation can spill beyond ipc_mni. The returned SysV IPC id still uses the normal index encoding, so later lookup and removal can target the wrong slot. This leaves the real IDR entry behind and breaks the IDR state for the object.
The bug is in ipc_idr_alloc() in the checkpoint/restore path.
-
ids->next_id is passed to:
idr_alloc(&ids->ipcs_idr, new, ipcid_to_idx(next_id), 0, ...)
-
The zero upper bound makes the allocation effectively open-ended. Once the valid SysV IPC tail is occupied, idr_alloc() can spill past ipc_mni and allocate an entry beyond the valid IPC id range.
-
The new object id is still encoded with the narrower SysV IPC index width:
new->id = (new->seq << ipcmni_seq_shift()) + idx
-
Later removal goes through ipc_rmid(), which uses:
ipcid_to_idx(ipcp->id)
That truncates the real IDR index. An object actually stored at a high index can then be removed as if it lived at a low in-range index.
-
For shared memory, shm_destroy() frees the current object anyway, but the real high IDR slot is left behind as a dangling pointer.
-
A subsequent walk of /proc/sysvipc/shm reaches the stale IDR entry and dereferences freed memory.
Prevent this by bounding the requested allocation to ipc_mni so the checkpoint/restore path fails once the valid range is exhausted.(CVE-2026-52923)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
RDMA/umem: Fix truncation for block sizes >= 4G
When the iommu is used the linearization of the mapping can give a single block that is very large split across multiple SG entries.
When __rdma_block_iter_next() reassembles the split SG entries it is overflowing the 32 bit stack values and computed the wrong DMA addresses for blocks after the truncation.
Use the right types to hold DMA addresses.(CVE-2026-53133)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
IB/isert: Reject login PDUs shorter than ISER_HEADERS_LEN
In drivers/infiniband/ulp/isert/ib_isert.c, isert_login_recv_done() computes the login request payload length as wc->byte_len minus ISER_HEADERS_LEN with no lower bound, and login_req_len is a signed int. A remote iSER initiator can post a login Send work request carrying fewer than ISER_HEADERS_LEN (76) bytes, so the subtraction underflows and login_req_len becomes negative.
isert_rx_login_req() then reads that negative length back into a signed int, takes size = min(rx_buflen, MAX_KEY_VALUE_PAIRS), and because the min() is signed it keeps the negative value; the value is then passed as the memcpy() length and sign-extended to a multi-gigabyte size_t. The copy into the 8192-byte login->req_buf runs far out of bounds and faults, crashing the target node. The login phase precedes iSCSI authentication, so no credentials are required to reach this path.
Reject any login PDU shorter than ISER_HEADERS_LEN before the subtraction, mirroring the existing early return on a failed work completion, so login_req_len can never go negative. The upper bound was already safe: a posted login buffer cannot deliver more than ISER_RX_PAYLOAD_SIZE, so the difference stays at or below MAX_KEY_VALUE_PAIRS and the existing min() clamps it; only the missing lower bound needs to be added.(CVE-2026-53176)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
USB: serial: kl5kusb105: fix bulk-out buffer overflow
klsi_105_prepare_write_buffer() is called by the generic write path with the bulk-out buffer and its size (bulk_out_size, 64 bytes). It stores a two-byte length header at the start of the buffer and copies the payload from the write fifo starting at buf + KLSI_HDR_LEN, but passes the full buffer size as the number of bytes to copy:
count = kfifo_out_locked(&port->write_fifo, buf + KLSI_HDR_LEN, size, &port->lock);
When the fifo holds at least size bytes, size bytes are copied starting two bytes into the size-byte buffer, writing KLSI_HDR_LEN bytes past its end. Copy at most size - KLSI_HDR_LEN bytes instead, leaving room for the header as safe_serial already does.
Writing bulk_out_size or more bytes to the tty triggers a slab out-of-bounds write, observed with KASAN by emulating the device with dummy_hcd and raw-gadget:
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in kfifo_copy_out+0x83/0xc0 Write of size 64 at addr ffff888112c62202 by task python3 kfifo_copy_out klsi_105_prepare_write_buffer [kl5kusb105] usb_serial_generic_write_start [usbserial] Allocated by task 139: usb_serial_probe [usbserial] The buggy address is located 2 bytes inside of allocated 64-byte region
The out-of-bounds write no longer occurs with this change applied.(CVE-2026-53194)
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"bpftool-4.19.90-2607.1.0.0379.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-4.19.90-2607.1.0.0379.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-4.19.90-2607.1.0.0379.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-4.19.90-2607.1.0.0379.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-4.19.90-2607.1.0.0379.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-4.19.90-2607.1.0.0379.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-4.19.90-2607.1.0.0379.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-4.19.90-2607.1.0.0379.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-4.19.90-2607.1.0.0379.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-4.19.90-2607.1.0.0379.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-4.19.90-2607.1.0.0379.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2607.1.0.0379.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python2-perf-4.19.90-2607.1.0.0379.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python2-perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2607.1.0.0379.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-4.19.90-2607.1.0.0379.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2607.1.0.0379.oe2003sp4.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-4.19.90-2607.1.0.0379.oe2003sp4.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"bpftool-4.19.90-2607.1.0.0379.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-4.19.90-2607.1.0.0379.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-4.19.90-2607.1.0.0379.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-4.19.90-2607.1.0.0379.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-4.19.90-2607.1.0.0379.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-4.19.90-2607.1.0.0379.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-4.19.90-2607.1.0.0379.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-4.19.90-2607.1.0.0379.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-4.19.90-2607.1.0.0379.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-4.19.90-2607.1.0.0379.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-4.19.90-2607.1.0.0379.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2607.1.0.0379.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python2-perf-4.19.90-2607.1.0.0379.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python2-perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2607.1.0.0379.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-4.19.90-2607.1.0.0379.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-4.19.90-2607.1.0.0379.oe2003sp4.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:20.03-LTS-SP4",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-20.03-LTS-SP4"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.19.90-2607.1.0.0379.oe2003sp4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "High"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nipc: limit next_id allocation to the valid ID range\n\nThe checkpoint/restore sysctl path can request the next SysV IPC id\nthrough ids-\u0026gt;next_id. ipc_idr_alloc() currently forwards that request to\nidr_alloc() with an open-ended upper bound.\n\nIf the valid tail of the SysV IPC id space is full, the allocation can\nspill beyond ipc_mni. The returned SysV IPC id still uses the normal\nindex encoding, so later lookup and removal can target the wrong slot. \nThis leaves the real IDR entry behind and breaks the IDR state for the\nobject.\n\nThe bug is in ipc_idr_alloc() in the checkpoint/restore path.\n\n1. ids-\u0026gt;next_id is passed to:\n\n idr_alloc(\u0026amp;ids-\u0026gt;ipcs_idr, new, ipcid_to_idx(next_id), 0, ...)\n\n2. The zero upper bound makes the allocation effectively open-ended.\n Once the valid SysV IPC tail is occupied, idr_alloc() can spill past\n ipc_mni and allocate an entry beyond the valid IPC id range.\n\n3. The new object id is still encoded with the narrower SysV IPC index\n width:\n\n new-\u0026gt;id = (new-\u0026gt;seq \u0026lt;\u0026lt; ipcmni_seq_shift()) + idx\n\n4. Later removal goes through ipc_rmid(), which uses:\n\n ipcid_to_idx(ipcp-\u0026gt;id)\n\n That truncates the real IDR index. An object actually stored at a\n high index can then be removed as if it lived at a low in-range\n index.\n\n5. For shared memory, shm_destroy() frees the current object anyway, but\n the real high IDR slot is left behind as a dangling pointer.\n\n6. A subsequent walk of /proc/sysvipc/shm reaches the stale IDR entry\n and dereferences freed memory.\n\nPrevent this by bounding the requested allocation to ipc_mni so the\ncheckpoint/restore path fails once the valid range is exhausted.(CVE-2026-52923)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nRDMA/umem: Fix truncation for block sizes \u0026gt;= 4G\n\nWhen the iommu is used the linearization of the mapping can give a single\nblock that is very large split across multiple SG entries.\n\nWhen __rdma_block_iter_next() reassembles the split SG entries it is\noverflowing the 32 bit stack values and computed the wrong DMA addresses\nfor blocks after the truncation.\n\nUse the right types to hold DMA addresses.(CVE-2026-53133)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nIB/isert: Reject login PDUs shorter than ISER_HEADERS_LEN\n\nIn drivers/infiniband/ulp/isert/ib_isert.c, isert_login_recv_done()\ncomputes the login request payload length as wc-\u0026gt;byte_len minus\nISER_HEADERS_LEN with no lower bound, and login_req_len is a signed int.\nA remote iSER initiator can post a login Send work request carrying\nfewer than ISER_HEADERS_LEN (76) bytes, so the subtraction underflows\nand login_req_len becomes negative.\n\nisert_rx_login_req() then reads that negative length back into a signed\nint, takes size = min(rx_buflen, MAX_KEY_VALUE_PAIRS), and because the\nmin() is signed it keeps the negative value; the value is then passed as\nthe memcpy() length and sign-extended to a multi-gigabyte size_t. The\ncopy into the 8192-byte login-\u0026gt;req_buf runs far out of bounds and\nfaults, crashing the target node. The login phase precedes iSCSI\nauthentication, so no credentials are required to reach this path.\n\nReject any login PDU shorter than ISER_HEADERS_LEN before the\nsubtraction, mirroring the existing early return on a failed work\ncompletion, so login_req_len can never go negative. The upper bound was\nalready safe: a posted login buffer cannot deliver more than\nISER_RX_PAYLOAD_SIZE, so the difference stays at or below\nMAX_KEY_VALUE_PAIRS and the existing min() clamps it; only the missing\nlower bound needs to be added.(CVE-2026-53176)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nUSB: serial: kl5kusb105: fix bulk-out buffer overflow\n\nklsi_105_prepare_write_buffer() is called by the generic write path\nwith the bulk-out buffer and its size (bulk_out_size, 64 bytes). It\nstores a two-byte length header at the start of the buffer and copies\nthe payload from the write fifo starting at buf + KLSI_HDR_LEN, but\npasses the full buffer size as the number of bytes to copy:\n\n count = kfifo_out_locked(\u0026amp;port-\u0026gt;write_fifo, buf + KLSI_HDR_LEN,\n size, \u0026amp;port-\u0026gt;lock);\n\nWhen the fifo holds at least size bytes, size bytes are copied starting\ntwo bytes into the size-byte buffer, writing KLSI_HDR_LEN bytes past its\nend. Copy at most size - KLSI_HDR_LEN bytes instead, leaving room for\nthe header as safe_serial already does.\n\nWriting bulk_out_size or more bytes to the tty triggers a slab\nout-of-bounds write, observed with KASAN by emulating the device with\ndummy_hcd and raw-gadget:\n\n BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in kfifo_copy_out+0x83/0xc0\n Write of size 64 at addr ffff888112c62202 by task python3\n kfifo_copy_out\n klsi_105_prepare_write_buffer [kl5kusb105]\n usb_serial_generic_write_start [usbserial]\n Allocated by task 139:\n usb_serial_probe [usbserial]\n The buggy address is located 2 bytes inside of allocated 64-byte region\n\nThe out-of-bounds write no longer occurs with this change applied.(CVE-2026-53194)",
"id": "OESA-2026-2929",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:11:50Z",
"published": "2026-07-09T11:11:50Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2026-2929"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-52923"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53133"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53176"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53194"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2026-52923",
"CVE-2026-53133",
"CVE-2026-53176",
"CVE-2026-53194"
]
}
OESA-2026-2930 (CVE-2026-43052)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2026-07-09 11:11 – Updated: 2026-08-06 11:11 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: mac80211: check tdls flag in ieee80211_tdls_oper
When NL80211_TDLS_ENABLE_LINK is called, the code only checks if the station exists but not whether it is actually a TDLS station. This allows the operation to proceed for non-TDLS stations, causing unintended side effects like modifying channel context and HT protection before failing.
Add a check for sta->sta.tdls early in the ENABLE_LINK case, before any side effects occur, to ensure the operation is only allowed for actual TDLS peers.(CVE-2026-43052)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wifi: brcmfmac: validate bsscfg indices in IF events
brcmf_fweh_handle_if_event() validates the firmware-provided interface index before it touches drvr->iflist[], but it still uses the raw bsscfgidx field as an array index without a matching range check.
Reject IF events whose bsscfg index does not fit in drvr->iflist[] before indexing the interface array.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
HID: roccat: fix use-after-free in roccat_report_event
roccat_report_event() iterates over the device->readers list without holding the readers_lock. This allows a concurrent roccat_release() to remove and free a reader while it's still being accessed, leading to a use-after-free.
Protect the readers list traversal with the readers_lock mutex.(CVE-2026-43111)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdkfd: Fix out-of-bounds write in kfd_event_page_set()
The kfd_event_page_set() function writes KFD_SIGNAL_EVENT_LIMIT * 8 bytes via memset without checking the buffer size parameter. This allows unprivileged userspace to trigger an out-of bounds kernel memory write by passing a small buffer, leading to potential privilege escalation.(CVE-2026-43206)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ext4: drop extent cache after doing PARTIAL_VALID1 zeroout
When splitting an unwritten extent in the middle and converting it to initialized in ext4_split_extent() with the EXT4_EXT_MAY_ZEROOUT and EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID2 flags set, it could leave a stale unwritten extent.
Assume we have an unwritten file and buffered write in the middle of it without dioread_nolock enabled, it will allocate blocks as written extent.
0 A B N
[UUUUUUUUUUUU] on-disk extent U: unwritten extent
[UUUUUUUUUUUU] extent status tree
[--DDDDDDDD--] D: valid data
|<- ->| ----> this range needs to be initialized
ext4_split_extent() first try to split this extent at B with EXT4_EXT_DATA_PARTIAL_VALID1 and EXT4_EXT_MAY_ZEROOUT flag set, but ext4_split_extent_at() failed to split this extent due to temporary lack of space. It zeroout B to N and leave the entire extent as unwritten.
0 A B N
[UUUUUUUUUUUU] on-disk extent
[UUUUUUUUUUUU] extent status tree
[--DDDDDDDDZZ] Z: zeroed data
ext4_split_extent() then try to split this extent at A with EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID2 flag set. This time, it split successfully and leave an written extent from A to N.
0 A B N
[UUWWWWWWWWWW] on-disk extent W: written extent
[UUUUUUUUUUUU] extent status tree
[--DDDDDDDDZZ]
Finally ext4_map_create_blocks() only insert extent A to B to the extent status tree, and leave an stale unwritten extent in the status tree.
0 A B N
[UUWWWWWWWWWW] on-disk extent W: written extent
[UUWWWWWWWWUU] extent status tree
[--DDDDDDDDZZ]
Fix this issue by always cached extent status entry after zeroing out the second part.(CVE-2026-45892)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ext4: drop extent cache when splitting extent fails
When the split extent fails, we might leave some extents still being processed and return an error directly, which will result in stale extent entries remaining in the extent status tree. So drop all of the remaining potentially stale extents if the splitting fails.(CVE-2026-45899)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ext4: don't cache extent during splitting extent
Caching extents during the splitting process is risky, as it may result in stale extents remaining in the status tree. Moreover, in most cases, the corresponding extent block entries are likely already cached before the split happens, making caching here not particularly useful.
Assume we have an unwritten extent, and then DIO writes the first half.
[UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU] on-disk extent U: unwritten extent [UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU] extent status tree |<- ->| ----> dio write this range
First, when ext4_split_extent_at() splits this extent, it truncates the existing extent and then inserts a new one. During this process, this extent status entry may be shrunk, and calls to ext4_find_extent() and ext4_cache_extents() may occur, which could potentially insert the truncated range as a hole into the extent status tree. After the split is completed, this hole is not replaced with the correct status.
[UUUUUUU|UUUUUUUU] on-disk extent U: unwritten extent [UUUUUUU|HHHHHHHH] extent status tree H: hole
Then, the outer calling functions will not correct this remaining hole extent either. Finally, if we perform a delayed buffer write on this latter part, it will re-insert the delayed extent and cause an error in space accounting.
In adition, if the unwritten extent cache is not shrunk during the splitting, ext4_cache_extents() also conflicts with existing extents when caching extents. In the future, we will add checks when caching extents, which will trigger a warning. Therefore, Do not cache extents that are being split.(CVE-2026-45912)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipc: limit next_id allocation to the valid ID range
The checkpoint/restore sysctl path can request the next SysV IPC id through ids->next_id. ipc_idr_alloc() currently forwards that request to idr_alloc() with an open-ended upper bound.
If the valid tail of the SysV IPC id space is full, the allocation can spill beyond ipc_mni. The returned SysV IPC id still uses the normal index encoding, so later lookup and removal can target the wrong slot. This leaves the real IDR entry behind and breaks the IDR state for the object.
The bug is in ipc_idr_alloc() in the checkpoint/restore path.
-
ids->next_id is passed to:
idr_alloc(&ids->ipcs_idr, new, ipcid_to_idx(next_id), 0, ...)
-
The zero upper bound makes the allocation effectively open-ended. Once the valid SysV IPC tail is occupied, idr_alloc() can spill past ipc_mni and allocate an entry beyond the valid IPC id range.
-
The new object id is still encoded with the narrower SysV IPC index width:
new->id = (new->seq << ipcmni_seq_shift()) + idx
-
Later removal goes through ipc_rmid(), which uses:
ipcid_to_idx(ipcp->id)
That truncates the real IDR index. An object actually stored at a high index can then be removed as if it lived at a low in-range index.
-
For shared memory, shm_destroy() frees the current object anyway, but the real high IDR slot is left behind as a dangling pointer.
-
A subsequent walk of /proc/sysvipc/shm reaches the stale IDR entry and dereferences freed memory.
Prevent this by bounding the requested allocation to ipc_mni so the checkpoint/restore path fails once the valid range is exhausted.(CVE-2026-52923)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: skbuff: fix missing zerocopy reference in pskb_carve helpers
pskb_carve_inside_header() and pskb_carve_inside_nonlinear() both copy the old skb_shared_info header into a new buffer via memcpy(), which includes the destructor_arg pointer (uarg) for MSG_ZEROCOPY skbs. Neither function calls net_zcopy_get() for the new shinfo, creating an unaccounted holder: every skb_shared_info with destructor_arg set will call skb_zcopy_clear() once when freed, but the corresponding net_zcopy_get() was never called for the new copy. Repeated calls drive uarg->refcnt to zero prematurely, freeing ubuf_info_msgzc while TX skbs still hold live destructor_arg pointers.
KASAN reports use-after-free on a freed ubuf_info_msgzc:
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in skb_release_data+0x77b/0x810 Read of size 8 at addr ffff88801574d3e8 by task poc/220
Call Trace: skb_release_data+0x77b/0x810 kfree_skb_list_reason+0x13e/0x610 skb_release_data+0x4cd/0x810 sk_skb_reason_drop+0xf3/0x340 skb_queue_purge_reason+0x282/0x440 rds_tcp_inc_free+0x1e/0x30 rds_recvmsg+0x354/0x1780 __sys_recvmsg+0xdf/0x180
Allocated by task 219: msg_zerocopy_realloc+0x157/0x7b0 tcp_sendmsg_locked+0x2892/0x3ba0
Freed by task 219: ip_recv_error+0x74a/0xb10 tcp_recvmsg+0x475/0x530
The skb consuming the late access still referenced the same uarg via shinfo->destructor_arg copied by pskb_carve_inside_nonlinear() without a refcount bump. This has been verified to be reliably exploitable: a working proof-of-concept achieves full root privilege escalation from an unprivileged local user on a default kernel configuration.
The fix follows the pattern of pskb_expand_head() which has the same memcpy/cloned structure. For pskb_carve_inside_header(), net_zcopy_get() is placed after skb_orphan_frags() succeeds, so the orphan error path needs no cleanup. For pskb_carve_inside_nonlinear(), net_zcopy_get() is placed after all failure points and just before skb_release_data(), so no error path needs cleanup at all -- matching pskb_expand_head() more closely and avoiding the need for a balancing net_zcopy_put().(CVE-2026-52943)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ALSA: usb-audio: Bound MIDI endpoint descriptor scans
snd_usbmidi_get_ms_info() validates the internal MIDIStreaming endpoint descriptor size before using baAssocJackID[], but the descriptor walker can still return a class-specific endpoint descriptor whose bLength exceeds the remaining bytes in the endpoint-extra scan.
That leaves later flexible-array reads bounded by bLength, but not by the remaining bytes in the endpoint-extra scan.
Stop walking when bLength is zero or extends past the remaining endpoint-extra scan.(CVE-2026-52963)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: nft_ct: fix missing expect put in obj eval
nft_ct_expect_obj_eval() allocates an expectation and may call nf_ct_expect_related(), but never drops its local reference.
Add nf_ct_expect_put(exp) before return to balance allocation.(CVE-2026-52970)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: nf_conntrack_sip: don't use simple_strtoul
Replace unsafe port parsing in epaddr_len(), ct_sip_parse_header_uri(), and ct_sip_parse_request() with a new sip_parse_port() helper that validates each digit against the buffer limit, eliminating the use of simple_strtoul() which assumes NUL-terminated strings.
The previous code dereferenced pointers without bounds checks after sip_parse_addr() and relied on simple_strtoul() on non-NUL-terminated skb data. A port that reaches the buffer limit without a trailing character is also rejected as malformed.
Also get rid of all simple_strtoul() usage in conntrack, prefer a stricter version instead. There are intentional changes:
-
Bail out if number is > UINT_MAX and indicate a failure, same for too long sequences. While we do accept 05535 as port 5535, we will not accept e.g. 'sip:10.0.0.1:005060'. While its syntactically valid under RFC 3261, we should restrict this to not waste cycles when presented with malformed packets with 64k '0' characters.
-
Force base 10 in ct_sip_parse_numerical_param(). This is used to fetch 'expire=' and 'rports='; both are expected to use base-10.
-
In nf_nat_sip.c, only accept the parsed value if its within the 1k-64k range.
-
epaddr_len now returns 0 if the port is invalid, as it already does for invalid ip addresses. This is intentional. nf_conntrack_sip performs lots of guesswork to find the right parts of the message to parse. Being stricter could break existing setups. Connection tracking helpers are designed to allow traffic to pass, not to block it.
Based on an earlier patch from Jenny Guanni Qu <(CVE-2026-52986)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
sched/psi: fix race between file release and pressure write
A potential race condition exists between pressure write and cgroup file release regarding the priv member of struct kernfs_open_file, which triggers the uaf reported in [1].
Consider the following scenario involving execution on two separate CPUs:
CPU0 CPU1 ==== ==== vfs_rmdir() kernfs_iop_rmdir() cgroup_rmdir() cgroup_kn_lock_live() cgroup_destroy_locked() cgroup_addrm_files() cgroup_rm_file() kernfs_remove_by_name() kernfs_remove_by_name_ns() vfs_write() __kernfs_remove() new_sync_write() kernfs_drain() kernfs_fop_write_iter() kernfs_drain_open_files() cgroup_file_write() kernfs_release_file() pressure_write() cgroup_file_release() ctx = of->priv; kfree(ctx); of->priv = NULL; cgroup_kn_unlock() cgroup_kn_lock_live() cgroup_get(cgrp) cgroup_kn_unlock() if (ctx->psi.trigger) // here, trigger uaf for ctx, that is of->priv
The cgroup_rmdir() is protected by the cgroup_mutex, it also safeguards the memory deallocation of of->priv performed within cgroup_file_release(). However, the operations involving of->priv executed within pressure_write() are not entirely covered by the protection of cgroup_mutex. Consequently, if the code in pressure_write(), specifically the section handling the ctx variable executes after cgroup_file_release() has completed, a uaf vulnerability involving of->priv is triggered.
Therefore, the issue can be resolved by extending the scope of the cgroup_mutex lock within pressure_write() to encompass all code paths involving of->priv, thereby properly synchronizing the race condition occurring between cgroup_file_release() and pressure_write().
And, if an live kn lock can be successfully acquired while executing the pressure write operation, it indicates that the cgroup deletion process has not yet reached its final stage; consequently, the priv pointer within open_file cannot be NULL. Therefore, the operation to retrieve the ctx value must be moved to a point after the live kn lock has been successfully acquired.
In another situation, specifically after entering cgroup_kn_lock_live() but before acquiring cgroup_mutex, there exists a different class of race condition:
CPU0: write memory.pressure CPU1: write cgroup.pressure=0 =========================== =============================
kernfs_fop_write_iter() kernfs_get_active_of(of) pressure_write() cgroup_kn_lock_live(memory.pressure) cgroup_tryget(cgrp) kernfs_break_active_protection(kn) ... blocks on cgroup_mutex
cgroup_pressure_write()
cgroup_kn_lock_live(cgroup.pressure)
cgroup_file_show(memory.pressure, false)
kernfs_show(false)
kernfs_drain_open_files()
cgroup_file_release(of)
kfree(ctx)
of->priv = NULL
cgroup_kn_unlock()
... acquires cgroup_mutex ctx = of->priv; // may now be NULL if (ctx->psi.trigger) // NULL dereference
Consequently, there is a possibility that of->priv is NULL, the pressure write needs to check for this.
Now that the scope of the cgroup_mutex has been expanded, the original explicit cgroup_get/put operations are no longer necessary, this is because acquiring/releasing the live kn lock inherently executes a cgroup get/put operation.
[1] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in pressure_write+0xa4/0x210 kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:4011 Call Trace: pressure_write+0xa4/0x210 kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:4011 cgroup_file_write+0x36f/0x790 kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:43 ---truncated---(CVE-2026-52991)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: nfnetlink_osf: fix potential NULL dereference in ttl check
The nf_osf_ttl() function accessed skb->dev to perform a local interface address lookup without verifying that the device pointer was valid.
Additionally, the implementation utilized an in_dev_for_each_ifa_rcu loop to match the packet source address against local interface addresses. It assumed that packets from the same subnet should not see a decrement on the initial TTL. A packet might appear it is from the same subnet but it actually isn't especially in modern environments with containers and virtual switching.
Remove the device dereference and interface loop. Replace the logic with a switch statement that evaluates the TTL according to the ttl_check.(CVE-2026-52998)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: conntrack: remove sprintf usage
Replace it with scnprintf, the buffer sizes are expected to be large enough to hold the result, no need for snprintf+overflow check.
Increase buffer size in mangle_content_len() while at it.
BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in vsnprintf+0xea5/0x1270 Write of size 1 at addr [..] vsnprintf+0xea5/0x1270 sprintf+0xb1/0xe0 mangle_content_len+0x1ac/0x280 nf_nat_sdp_session+0x1cc/0x240 process_sdp+0x8f8/0xb80 process_invite_request+0x108/0x2b0 process_sip_msg+0x5da/0xf50 sip_help_tcp+0x45e/0x780 nf_confirm+0x34d/0x990 ..
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
gfs2: add some missing log locking
Function gfs2_logd() calls the log flushing functions gfs2_ail1_start(), gfs2_ail1_wait(), and gfs2_ail1_empty() without holding sdp->sd_log_flush_lock, but these functions require exclusion against concurrent transactions.
To fix that, add a non-locking __gfs2_log_flush() function. Then, in gfs2_logd(), take sdp->sd_log_flush_lock before calling the above mentioned log flushing functions and __gfs2_log_flush().(CVE-2026-53049)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: fix locking in hci_conn_request_evt() with HCI_PROTO_DEFER
When protocol sets HCI_PROTO_DEFER, hci_conn_request_evt() calls hci_connect_cfm(conn) without hdev->lock. Generally hci_connect_cfm() assumes it is held, and if conn is deleted concurrently -> UAF.
Only SCO and ISO set HCI_PROTO_DEFER and only for defer setup listen, and HCI_EV_CONN_REQUEST is not generated for ISO. In the non-deferred listening socket code paths, hci_connect_cfm(conn) is called with hdev->lock held.
Fix by holding the lock.(CVE-2026-53072)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bus: fsl-mc: use generic driver_override infrastructure
When a driver is probed through __driver_attach(), the bus' match() callback is called without the device lock held, thus accessing the driver_override field without a lock, which can cause a UAF.
Fix this by using the driver-core driver_override infrastructure taking care of proper locking internally.
Note that calling match() from __driver_attach() without the device lock held is intentional. 1
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
USB: serial: kl5kusb105: fix bulk-out buffer overflow
klsi_105_prepare_write_buffer() is called by the generic write path with the bulk-out buffer and its size (bulk_out_size, 64 bytes). It stores a two-byte length header at the start of the buffer and copies the payload from the write fifo starting at buf + KLSI_HDR_LEN, but passes the full buffer size as the number of bytes to copy:
count = kfifo_out_locked(&port->write_fifo, buf + KLSI_HDR_LEN, size, &port->lock);
When the fifo holds at least size bytes, size bytes are copied starting two bytes into the size-byte buffer, writing KLSI_HDR_LEN bytes past its end. Copy at most size - KLSI_HDR_LEN bytes instead, leaving room for the header as safe_serial already does.
Writing bulk_out_size or more bytes to the tty triggers a slab out-of-bounds write, observed with KASAN by emulating the device with dummy_hcd and raw-gadget:
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in kfifo_copy_out+0x83/0xc0 Write of size 64 at addr ffff888112c62202 by task python3 kfifo_copy_out klsi_105_prepare_write_buffer [kl5kusb105] usb_serial_generic_write_start [usbserial] Allocated by task 139: usb_serial_probe [usbserial] The buggy address is located 2 bytes inside of allocated 64-byte region
The out-of-bounds write no longer occurs with this change applied.(CVE-2026-53194)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
USB: serial: io_ti: fix heap overflow in build_i2c_fw_hdr()
build_i2c_fw_hdr() allocates a fixed-size buffer of (16*1024 - 512) + sizeof(struct ti_i2c_firmware_rec) bytes, then copies le16_to_cpu(img_header->Length) bytes into it without validating that Length fits within the available space after the firmware record header.
img_header->Length is a __le16 from the firmware file and can be up to 65535. check_fw_sanity() validates the total firmware size but not img_header->Length specifically.
Fix by rejecting images where img_header->Length exceeds the available destination space.(CVE-2026-53195)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: L2CAP: reject BR/EDR signaling packets over MTUsig
net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c:l2cap_sig_channel() accepts BR/EDR signaling packets up to the channel MTU and dispatches each command without enforcing the signaling MTU (MTUsig). A Bluetooth BR/EDR peer within radio range can send a fixed-channel CID 0x0001 packet that is larger than MTUsig and contains many L2CAP_ECHO_REQ commands before pairing. In a real-radio stock-kernel run, one 681-byte signaling packet containing 168 zero-length ECHO_REQ commands made the target transmit 168 ECHO_RSP frames over about 220 ms.
Impact: a Bluetooth BR/EDR peer within radio range, before pairing, can force 168 ECHO_RSP frames from one 681-byte fixed-channel signaling packet containing packed ECHO_REQ commands.
Define Linux's BR/EDR signaling MTU as the spec minimum of 48 bytes and reject any larger signaling packet with one L2CAP_COMMAND_REJECT_RSP carrying L2CAP_REJ_MTU_EXCEEDED before any command is dispatched.
The Bluetooth Core spec wording for MTUExceeded says the reject identifier shall match the first request command in the packet, and that packets containing only responses shall be silently discarded. Linux intentionally deviates from that prescription: silently discarding desynchronizes the peer because the remote stack never learns its responses were dropped, and locating the first request command requires walking command headers past MTUsig, i.e. processing bytes from a packet we have already decided is too large to process. We therefore always emit one reject and use the identifier from the first command header, a single fixed-offset byte read.
The unrestricted BR/EDR signaling parser and ECHO_REQ response path both trace to the initial git import; no later introducing commit is available for a Fixes tag.(CVE-2026-53208)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tcp: restrict SO_ATTACH_FILTER to priv users
This patch restricts the use of SO_ATTACH_FILTER (cBPF) on TCP sockets to users with CAP_NET_ADMIN capability.
This blocks potential side-channel attack where an unprivileged application attaches a filter to leak TCP sequence/acknowledgment numbers.(CVE-2026-53236)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netlabel: validate unlabeled address and mask attribute lengths
netlbl_unlabel_addrinfo_get() used the address attribute length to determine whether the attribute data could be read as an IPv4 or IPv6 address, but did not independently validate the corresponding mask attribute length. A crafted Generic Netlink request could therefore provide a valid IPv4/IPv6 address attribute with a shorter mask attribute, which would later be read as a full struct in_addr or struct in6_addr.
NLA_BINARY policy lengths are maximum lengths by default, so use NLA_POLICY_EXACT_LEN() for the unlabeled IPv4/IPv6 address and mask attributes. This rejects short attributes during policy validation and also exposes the exact length requirements through policy introspection.(CVE-2026-53238)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/802/mrp: fix vector attribute parsing in mrp_pdu_parse_vecattr
In mrp_pdu_parse_vecattr(), vector attribute events are encoded three per byte and valen tracks the number of events left to process.
The parser decrements valen after processing the first and second events from each event byte, but not after processing the third one. When valen is exactly a multiple of three, the loop continues after the last valid event and consumes the next byte as a new event byte, applying a spurious event to the MRP applicant state.
Additionally, when valen is zero the parser unconditionally consumes attrlen bytes as FirstValue and advances the offset, even though per IEEE 802.1ak a VectorAttribute with only a LeaveAllEvent has valen of zero and no FirstValue or Vector fields. This corrupts the offset for subsequent PDU parsing.
Also, when valen exceeds three the loop crosses byte boundaries but the attribute value is not incremented between the last event of one byte and the first event of the next. This causes the first event of the next byte to use the same attribute value as the third event rather than the next consecutive value.
Decrement valen after processing the third event, skip FirstValue consumption when valen is zero, and increment the attribute value at the end of each loop iteration.(CVE-2026-53245)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipv4: restrict IPOPT_SSRR and IPOPT_LSRR options
This patch restricts setting Loose Source and Record Route (LSRR) and Strict Source and Record Route (SSRR) IP options to users with CAP_NET_RAW capability.
This prevents unprivileged applications from forcing packets to route through attacker-controlled nodes to leak TCP ISN and possibly other protocol information.
While LSRR and SSRR are commonly filtered in many network environments, they may still be supported and forwarded along some network paths.
RFC 7126 (Recommendations on Filtering of IPv4 Packets Containing IPv4 Options) recommend to drop these options in 4.3 and 4.4.(CVE-2026-53249)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: fix memory leak in error path of hci_alloc_dev()
Early failures in Bluetooth HCI UART configuration leak SRCU percpu memory.
When device initialization fails before hci_register_dev() completes, the HCI_UNREGISTER flag is never set. As a result, when the device reference count reaches zero, bt_host_release() evaluates this flag as false and falls back to a direct kfree(hdev).
Because hci_release_dev() is bypassed, the SRCU struct initialized early in hci_alloc_dev() is never cleaned up, resulting in a leak of percpu memory.
Fix the leak by explicitly calling cleanup_srcu_struct() in the fallback (unregistered) branch of bt_host_release() before freeing the device.(CVE-2026-53252)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: bridge: make ebt_snat ARP rewrite writable
The ebtables SNAT target keeps the Ethernet source address rewrite behind skb_ensure_writable(skb, 0). This is intentional: at the bridge ebtables hooks the Ethernet header is addressed through skb_mac_header()/eth_hdr(), while skb->data points at the Ethernet payload. Asking skb_ensure_writable() for ETH_HLEN bytes would check the payload, not the Ethernet header, and would reintroduce the small packet regression fixed by commit 63137bc5882a.
However, the optional ARP sender hardware address rewrite is different. It writes through skb_store_bits() at an offset relative to skb->data:
skb_store_bits(skb, sizeof(struct arphdr), info->mac, ETH_ALEN)
skb_header_pointer() only safely reads the ARP header; it does not make the later sender hardware address range writable. If that range is still held in a nonlinear skb fragment backed by a splice-imported file page, skb_store_bits() maps the frag page and copies the new MAC address directly into it.
Ensure the ARP SHA range is writable before reading the ARP header and before calling skb_store_bits().(CVE-2026-53266)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: conntrack_irc: fix possible out-of-bounds read
When parsing fails after we've matched the command string we should bail out instead of trying to match a different command.
This helper should be deprecated, given prevalence of TLS I doubt it has any relevance in 2026.(CVE-2026-53268)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: synproxy: add mutex to guard hook reference counting
As the synproxy infrastructure register netfilter hooks on-demand when a user adds the first iptables target or nftables expression, if done concurrently they can race each other.
Introduce a mutex to serialize the refcount control blocks access from both frontends. While a per namespace mutex might be more efficient, it is not needed for target/expression like SYNPROXY.(CVE-2026-53269)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipvs: clear the svc scheduler ptr early on edit
ip_vs_edit_service() while unbinding the old scheduler clears the svc->scheduler ptr after the scheduler module initiates RCU callbacks. This can cause packets to use the old scheduler at the time when svc->sched_data is already freed after RCU grace period.
Fix it by clearing the ptr early in ip_vs_unbind_scheduler(), before the done_service method schedules any RCU callbacks.
Also, if the new scheduler fails to initialize when replacing the old scheduler, try to restore the old scheduler while still returning the error code.(CVE-2026-53270)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipv6: mcast: Fix use-after-free when processing MLD queries
When processing an MLD query, a pointer to the multicast group address is retrieved when initially parsing the packet. This pointer is later dereferenced without being reloaded despite the fact that the skb header might have been reallocated following the pskb_may_pull() calls, leading to a use-after-free [1].
Fix by copying the multicast group address when the packet is initially parsed.
[1] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __mld_query_work (net/ipv6/mcast.c:1512) Read of size 8 at addr ffff8881154b8e90 by task kworker/4:1/118
Workqueue: mld mld_query_work Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:94 lib/dump_stack.c:120) print_address_description.constprop.0 (mm/kasan/report.c:378) print_report (mm/kasan/report.c:482) kasan_report (mm/kasan/report.c:595) __mld_query_work (net/ipv6/mcast.c:1512) mld_query_work (net/ipv6/mcast.c:1563) process_one_work (kernel/workqueue.c:3314) worker_thread (kernel/workqueue.c:3397 kernel/workqueue.c:3478) kthread (kernel/kthread.c:436) ret_from_fork (arch/x86/kernel/process.c:158) ret_from_fork_asm (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:245) </TASK>
[...]
Freed by task 118: kasan_save_stack (mm/kasan/common.c:57) kasan_save_track (mm/kasan/common.c:78) kasan_save_free_info (mm/kasan/generic.c:584) __kasan_slab_free (mm/kasan/common.c:253 mm/kasan/common.c:285) kfree (./include/linux/kasan.h:235 mm/slub.c:2689 mm/slub.c:6251 mm/slub.c:6566) pskb_expand_head (net/core/skbuff.c:2335) __pskb_pull_tail (net/core/skbuff.c:2878 (discriminator 4)) __mld_query_work (net/ipv6/mcast.c:1495 (discriminator 1)) mld_query_work (net/ipv6/mcast.c:1563) process_one_work (kernel/workqueue.c:3314) worker_thread (kernel/workqueue.c:3397 kernel/workqueue.c:3478) kthread (kernel/kthread.c:436) ret_from_fork (arch/x86/kernel/process.c:158) ret_from_fork_asm (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:245)(CVE-2026-53275)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: fix UAF in l2cap_sock_cleanup_listen() vs l2cap_conn_del()
bt_accept_dequeue() unlinks a not-yet-accepted child from the parent accept queue and release_sock()s it before returning, so the returned sk has no caller reference and is unlocked.
l2cap_sock_cleanup_listen() walks these children on listening-socket close. A concurrent HCI disconnect drives hci_rx_work -> l2cap_conn_del() which runs l2cap_chan_del() + l2cap_sock_kill() and frees the child sk and its l2cap_chan; cleanup_listen() then uses both:
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in l2cap_sock_kill l2cap_sock_kill / l2cap_sock_cleanup_listen / __x64_sys_close Freed by: l2cap_conn_del -> l2cap_sock_close_cb -> l2cap_sock_kill
This is distinct from the two fixes already in this area: commit e83f5e24da741 ("Bluetooth: serialize accept_q access") serialises the accept_q list/poll and takes temporary refs inside bt_accept_dequeue(), and CVE-2025-39860 serialises the userspace close()/accept() race by calling cleanup_listen() under lock_sock() in l2cap_sock_release(). Neither covers l2cap_conn_del() running from hci_rx_work, so this UAF still reproduces on current bluetooth/master.
Take the reference at the source: bt_accept_dequeue() does sock_hold() while sk is still locked, before release_sock(); callers sock_put(). cleanup_listen() pins the chan with l2cap_chan_hold_unless_zero() under a brief child sk lock (serialising vs l2cap_sock_teardown_cb()), drops it before l2cap_chan_lock(), and skips a duplicate l2cap_sock_kill() on SOCK_DEAD. conn->lock is not taken here: cleanup_listen() runs under the parent sk lock and that would invert conn->lock -> chan->lock -> sk_lock (lockdep).
KASAN/SMP: an unprivileged listen/close vs HCI-disconnect race produced 12 use-after-free reports per run before this change; 0, and no lockdep report, over 1600+ raced iterations after it on bluetooth/master.(CVE-2026-53357)
| URL | Type | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"bpftool-5.10.0-323.0.0.224.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-5.10.0-323.0.0.224.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-5.10.0-323.0.0.224.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-323.0.0.224.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-323.0.0.224.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-323.0.0.224.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-323.0.0.224.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-323.0.0.224.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-323.0.0.224.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-323.0.0.224.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-323.0.0.224.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-323.0.0.224.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-323.0.0.224.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-323.0.0.224.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-323.0.0.224.oe2203sp4.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-5.10.0-323.0.0.224.oe2203sp4.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"bpftool-5.10.0-323.0.0.224.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-5.10.0-323.0.0.224.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-5.10.0-323.0.0.224.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-5.10.0-323.0.0.224.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-5.10.0-323.0.0.224.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-5.10.0-323.0.0.224.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-5.10.0-323.0.0.224.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-5.10.0-323.0.0.224.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-5.10.0-323.0.0.224.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-5.10.0-323.0.0.224.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-5.10.0-323.0.0.224.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-5.10.0-323.0.0.224.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-323.0.0.224.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-5.10.0-323.0.0.224.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-5.10.0-323.0.0.224.oe2203sp4.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP4",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP4"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.10.0-323.0.0.224.oe2203sp4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "Critical"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nwifi: mac80211: check tdls flag in ieee80211_tdls_oper\n\nWhen NL80211_TDLS_ENABLE_LINK is called, the code only checks if the\nstation exists but not whether it is actually a TDLS station. This\nallows the operation to proceed for non-TDLS stations, causing\nunintended side effects like modifying channel context and HT\nprotection before failing.\n\nAdd a check for sta-\u0026gt;sta.tdls early in the ENABLE_LINK case, before\nany side effects occur, to ensure the operation is only allowed for\nactual TDLS peers.(CVE-2026-43052)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nwifi: brcmfmac: validate bsscfg indices in IF events\n\nbrcmf_fweh_handle_if_event() validates the firmware-provided interface\nindex before it touches drvr-\u0026gt;iflist[], but it still uses the raw\nbsscfgidx field as an array index without a matching range check.\n\nReject IF events whose bsscfg index does not fit in drvr-\u0026gt;iflist[]\nbefore indexing the interface array.\n\n[add missing wifi prefix](CVE-2026-43110)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nHID: roccat: fix use-after-free in roccat_report_event\n\nroccat_report_event() iterates over the device-\u0026gt;readers list without\nholding the readers_lock. This allows a concurrent roccat_release() to\nremove and free a reader while it\u0026apos;s still being accessed, leading to a\nuse-after-free.\n\nProtect the readers list traversal with the readers_lock mutex.(CVE-2026-43111)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndrm/amdkfd: Fix out-of-bounds write in kfd_event_page_set()\n\nThe kfd_event_page_set() function writes KFD_SIGNAL_EVENT_LIMIT * 8\nbytes via memset without checking the buffer size parameter. This allows\nunprivileged userspace to trigger an out-of bounds kernel memory write\nby passing a small buffer, leading to potential privilege\nescalation.(CVE-2026-43206)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\next4: drop extent cache after doing PARTIAL_VALID1 zeroout\n\nWhen splitting an unwritten extent in the middle and converting it to\ninitialized in ext4_split_extent() with the EXT4_EXT_MAY_ZEROOUT and\nEXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID2 flags set, it could leave a stale unwritten extent.\n\nAssume we have an unwritten file and buffered write in the middle of it\nwithout dioread_nolock enabled, it will allocate blocks as written\nextent.\n\n 0 A B N\n [UUUUUUUUUUUU] on-disk extent U: unwritten extent\n [UUUUUUUUUUUU] extent status tree\n [--DDDDDDDD--] D: valid data\n |\u0026lt;- -\u0026gt;| ----\u0026gt; this range needs to be initialized\n\next4_split_extent() first try to split this extent at B with\nEXT4_EXT_DATA_PARTIAL_VALID1 and EXT4_EXT_MAY_ZEROOUT flag set, but\next4_split_extent_at() failed to split this extent due to temporary lack\nof space. It zeroout B to N and leave the entire extent as unwritten.\n\n 0 A B N\n [UUUUUUUUUUUU] on-disk extent\n [UUUUUUUUUUUU] extent status tree\n [--DDDDDDDDZZ] Z: zeroed data\n\next4_split_extent() then try to split this extent at A with\nEXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID2 flag set. This time, it split successfully and\nleave an written extent from A to N.\n\n 0 A B N\n [UUWWWWWWWWWW] on-disk extent W: written extent\n [UUUUUUUUUUUU] extent status tree\n [--DDDDDDDDZZ]\n\nFinally ext4_map_create_blocks() only insert extent A to B to the extent\nstatus tree, and leave an stale unwritten extent in the status tree.\n\n 0 A B N\n [UUWWWWWWWWWW] on-disk extent W: written extent\n [UUWWWWWWWWUU] extent status tree\n [--DDDDDDDDZZ]\n\nFix this issue by always cached extent status entry after zeroing out\nthe second part.(CVE-2026-45892)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\next4: drop extent cache when splitting extent fails\n\nWhen the split extent fails, we might leave some extents still being\nprocessed and return an error directly, which will result in stale\nextent entries remaining in the extent status tree. So drop all of the\nremaining potentially stale extents if the splitting fails.(CVE-2026-45899)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\next4: don\u0026apos;t cache extent during splitting extent\n\nCaching extents during the splitting process is risky, as it may result\nin stale extents remaining in the status tree. Moreover, in most cases,\nthe corresponding extent block entries are likely already cached before\nthe split happens, making caching here not particularly useful.\n\nAssume we have an unwritten extent, and then DIO writes the first half.\n\n [UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU] on-disk extent U: unwritten extent\n [UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU] extent status tree\n |\u0026lt;- -\u0026gt;| ----\u0026gt; dio write this range\n\nFirst, when ext4_split_extent_at() splits this extent, it truncates the\nexisting extent and then inserts a new one. During this process, this\nextent status entry may be shrunk, and calls to ext4_find_extent() and\next4_cache_extents() may occur, which could potentially insert the\ntruncated range as a hole into the extent status tree. After the split\nis completed, this hole is not replaced with the correct status.\n\n [UUUUUUU|UUUUUUUU] on-disk extent U: unwritten extent\n [UUUUUUU|HHHHHHHH] extent status tree H: hole\n\nThen, the outer calling functions will not correct this remaining hole\nextent either. Finally, if we perform a delayed buffer write on this\nlatter part, it will re-insert the delayed extent and cause an error in\nspace accounting.\n\nIn adition, if the unwritten extent cache is not shrunk during the\nsplitting, ext4_cache_extents() also conflicts with existing extents\nwhen caching extents. In the future, we will add checks when caching\nextents, which will trigger a warning. Therefore, Do not cache extents\nthat are being split.(CVE-2026-45912)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nipc: limit next_id allocation to the valid ID range\n\nThe checkpoint/restore sysctl path can request the next SysV IPC id\nthrough ids-\u0026gt;next_id. ipc_idr_alloc() currently forwards that request to\nidr_alloc() with an open-ended upper bound.\n\nIf the valid tail of the SysV IPC id space is full, the allocation can\nspill beyond ipc_mni. The returned SysV IPC id still uses the normal\nindex encoding, so later lookup and removal can target the wrong slot. \nThis leaves the real IDR entry behind and breaks the IDR state for the\nobject.\n\nThe bug is in ipc_idr_alloc() in the checkpoint/restore path.\n\n1. ids-\u0026gt;next_id is passed to:\n\n idr_alloc(\u0026amp;ids-\u0026gt;ipcs_idr, new, ipcid_to_idx(next_id), 0, ...)\n\n2. The zero upper bound makes the allocation effectively open-ended.\n Once the valid SysV IPC tail is occupied, idr_alloc() can spill past\n ipc_mni and allocate an entry beyond the valid IPC id range.\n\n3. The new object id is still encoded with the narrower SysV IPC index\n width:\n\n new-\u0026gt;id = (new-\u0026gt;seq \u0026lt;\u0026lt; ipcmni_seq_shift()) + idx\n\n4. Later removal goes through ipc_rmid(), which uses:\n\n ipcid_to_idx(ipcp-\u0026gt;id)\n\n That truncates the real IDR index. An object actually stored at a\n high index can then be removed as if it lived at a low in-range\n index.\n\n5. For shared memory, shm_destroy() frees the current object anyway, but\n the real high IDR slot is left behind as a dangling pointer.\n\n6. A subsequent walk of /proc/sysvipc/shm reaches the stale IDR entry\n and dereferences freed memory.\n\nPrevent this by bounding the requested allocation to ipc_mni so the\ncheckpoint/restore path fails once the valid range is exhausted.(CVE-2026-52923)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: skbuff: fix missing zerocopy reference in pskb_carve helpers\n\npskb_carve_inside_header() and pskb_carve_inside_nonlinear() both copy\nthe old skb_shared_info header into a new buffer via memcpy(), which\nincludes the destructor_arg pointer (uarg) for MSG_ZEROCOPY skbs.\nNeither function calls net_zcopy_get() for the new shinfo, creating an\nunaccounted holder: every skb_shared_info with destructor_arg set will\ncall skb_zcopy_clear() once when freed, but the corresponding\nnet_zcopy_get() was never called for the new copy. Repeated calls\ndrive uarg-\u0026gt;refcnt to zero prematurely, freeing ubuf_info_msgzc while\nTX skbs still hold live destructor_arg pointers.\n\nKASAN reports use-after-free on a freed ubuf_info_msgzc:\n\n BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in skb_release_data+0x77b/0x810\n Read of size 8 at addr ffff88801574d3e8 by task poc/220\n\n Call Trace:\n skb_release_data+0x77b/0x810\n kfree_skb_list_reason+0x13e/0x610\n skb_release_data+0x4cd/0x810\n sk_skb_reason_drop+0xf3/0x340\n skb_queue_purge_reason+0x282/0x440\n rds_tcp_inc_free+0x1e/0x30\n rds_recvmsg+0x354/0x1780\n __sys_recvmsg+0xdf/0x180\n\n Allocated by task 219:\n msg_zerocopy_realloc+0x157/0x7b0\n tcp_sendmsg_locked+0x2892/0x3ba0\n\n Freed by task 219:\n ip_recv_error+0x74a/0xb10\n tcp_recvmsg+0x475/0x530\n\nThe skb consuming the late access still referenced the same uarg via\nshinfo-\u0026gt;destructor_arg copied by pskb_carve_inside_nonlinear() without\na refcount bump. This has been verified to be reliably exploitable: a\nworking proof-of-concept achieves full root privilege escalation from\nan unprivileged local user on a default kernel configuration.\n\nThe fix follows the pattern of pskb_expand_head() which has the same\nmemcpy/cloned structure. For pskb_carve_inside_header(), net_zcopy_get()\nis placed after skb_orphan_frags() succeeds, so the orphan error path\nneeds no cleanup. For pskb_carve_inside_nonlinear(), net_zcopy_get() is\nplaced after all failure points and just before skb_release_data(), so\nno error path needs cleanup at all -- matching pskb_expand_head() more\nclosely and avoiding the need for a balancing net_zcopy_put().(CVE-2026-52943)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nALSA: usb-audio: Bound MIDI endpoint descriptor scans\n\nsnd_usbmidi_get_ms_info() validates the internal MIDIStreaming endpoint\ndescriptor size before using baAssocJackID[], but the descriptor walker can\nstill return a class-specific endpoint descriptor whose bLength exceeds the\nremaining bytes in the endpoint-extra scan.\n\nThat leaves later flexible-array reads bounded by bLength, but not by the\nremaining bytes in the endpoint-extra scan.\n\nStop walking when bLength is zero or\nextends past the remaining endpoint-extra scan.(CVE-2026-52963)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnetfilter: nft_ct: fix missing expect put in obj eval\n\nnft_ct_expect_obj_eval() allocates an expectation and may call\nnf_ct_expect_related(), but never drops its local reference.\n\nAdd nf_ct_expect_put(exp) before return to balance allocation.(CVE-2026-52970)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnetfilter: nf_conntrack_sip: don\u0026apos;t use simple_strtoul\n\nReplace unsafe port parsing in epaddr_len(), ct_sip_parse_header_uri(),\nand ct_sip_parse_request() with a new sip_parse_port() helper that\nvalidates each digit against the buffer limit, eliminating the use of\nsimple_strtoul() which assumes NUL-terminated strings.\n\nThe previous code dereferenced pointers without bounds checks after\nsip_parse_addr() and relied on simple_strtoul() on non-NUL-terminated\nskb data. A port that reaches the buffer limit without a trailing\ncharacter is also rejected as malformed.\n\nAlso get rid of all simple_strtoul() usage in conntrack, prefer a\nstricter version instead. There are intentional changes:\n\n- Bail out if number is \u0026gt; UINT_MAX and indicate a failure, same for\n too long sequences.\n While we do accept 05535 as port 5535, we will not accept e.g.\n \u0026apos;sip:10.0.0.1:005060\u0026apos;. While its syntactically valid under RFC 3261,\n we should restrict this to not waste cycles when presented with\n malformed packets with 64k \u0026apos;0\u0026apos; characters.\n\n- Force base 10 in ct_sip_parse_numerical_param(). This is used to fetch\n \u0026apos;expire=\u0026apos; and \u0026apos;rports=\u0026apos;; both are expected to use base-10.\n\n- In nf_nat_sip.c, only accept the parsed value if its within the 1k-64k\n range.\n\n- epaddr_len now returns 0 if the port is invalid, as it already does\n for invalid ip addresses. This is intentional. nf_conntrack_sip\n performs lots of guesswork to find the right parts of the message\n to parse. Being stricter could break existing setups.\n Connection tracking helpers are designed to allow traffic to\n pass, not to block it.\n\nBased on an earlier patch from Jenny Guanni Qu \u0026lt;(CVE-2026-52986)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nsched/psi: fix race between file release and pressure write\n\nA potential race condition exists between pressure write and cgroup file\nrelease regarding the priv member of struct kernfs_open_file, which\ntriggers the uaf reported in [1].\n\nConsider the following scenario involving execution on two separate CPUs:\n\n CPU0\t\t\t\t\tCPU1\n ====\t\t\t\t\t====\n\t\t\t\t\tvfs_rmdir()\n\t\t\t\t\tkernfs_iop_rmdir()\n\t\t\t\t\tcgroup_rmdir()\n\t\t\t\t\tcgroup_kn_lock_live()\n\t\t\t\t\tcgroup_destroy_locked()\n\t\t\t\t\tcgroup_addrm_files()\n\t\t\t\t\tcgroup_rm_file()\n\t\t\t\t\tkernfs_remove_by_name()\n\t\t\t\t\tkernfs_remove_by_name_ns()\n vfs_write()\t\t\t\t__kernfs_remove()\n new_sync_write()\t\t\tkernfs_drain()\n kernfs_fop_write_iter()\t\tkernfs_drain_open_files()\n cgroup_file_write()\t\t\tkernfs_release_file()\n pressure_write()\t\t\tcgroup_file_release()\n ctx = of-\u0026gt;priv;\n\t\t\t\t\tkfree(ctx);\n \t\t\t\t\tof-\u0026gt;priv = NULL;\n\t\t\t\t\tcgroup_kn_unlock()\n cgroup_kn_lock_live()\n cgroup_get(cgrp)\n cgroup_kn_unlock()\n if (ctx-\u0026gt;psi.trigger) // here, trigger uaf for ctx, that is of-\u0026gt;priv\n\nThe cgroup_rmdir() is protected by the cgroup_mutex, it also safeguards\nthe memory deallocation of of-\u0026gt;priv performed within cgroup_file_release().\nHowever, the operations involving of-\u0026gt;priv executed within pressure_write()\nare not entirely covered by the protection of cgroup_mutex. Consequently,\nif the code in pressure_write(), specifically the section handling the\nctx variable executes after cgroup_file_release() has completed, a uaf\nvulnerability involving of-\u0026gt;priv is triggered.\n\nTherefore, the issue can be resolved by extending the scope of the\ncgroup_mutex lock within pressure_write() to encompass all code paths\ninvolving of-\u0026gt;priv, thereby properly synchronizing the race condition\noccurring between cgroup_file_release() and pressure_write().\n\nAnd, if an live kn lock can be successfully acquired while executing\nthe pressure write operation, it indicates that the cgroup deletion\nprocess has not yet reached its final stage; consequently, the priv\npointer within open_file cannot be NULL. Therefore, the operation to\nretrieve the ctx value must be moved to a point *after* the live kn\nlock has been successfully acquired.\n\nIn another situation, specifically after entering cgroup_kn_lock_live()\nbut before acquiring cgroup_mutex, there exists a different class of\nrace condition:\n\nCPU0: write memory.pressure CPU1: write cgroup.pressure=0\n===========================\t\t =============================\n\nkernfs_fop_write_iter()\n kernfs_get_active_of(of)\n pressure_write()\n cgroup_kn_lock_live(memory.pressure)\n cgroup_tryget(cgrp)\n kernfs_break_active_protection(kn)\n ... blocks on cgroup_mutex\n\n \t cgroup_pressure_write()\n \t cgroup_kn_lock_live(cgroup.pressure)\n \t cgroup_file_show(memory.pressure, false)\n \t kernfs_show(false)\n \t kernfs_drain_open_files()\n \t cgroup_file_release(of)\n \t kfree(ctx)\n \t of-\u0026gt;priv = NULL\n \t cgroup_kn_unlock()\n\n ... acquires cgroup_mutex\n ctx = of-\u0026gt;priv; // may now be NULL\n if (ctx-\u0026gt;psi.trigger) // NULL dereference\n\nConsequently, there is a possibility that of-\u0026gt;priv is NULL, the pressure\nwrite needs to check for this.\n\nNow that the scope of the cgroup_mutex has been expanded, the original\nexplicit cgroup_get/put operations are no longer necessary, this is\nbecause acquiring/releasing the live kn lock inherently executes a\ncgroup get/put operation.\n\n[1]\nBUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in pressure_write+0xa4/0x210 kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:4011\nCall Trace:\n pressure_write+0xa4/0x210 kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:4011\n cgroup_file_write+0x36f/0x790 kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:43\n---truncated---(CVE-2026-52991)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnetfilter: nfnetlink_osf: fix potential NULL dereference in ttl check\n\nThe nf_osf_ttl() function accessed skb-\u0026gt;dev to perform a local interface\naddress lookup without verifying that the device pointer was valid.\n\nAdditionally, the implementation utilized an in_dev_for_each_ifa_rcu\nloop to match the packet source address against local interface\naddresses. It assumed that packets from the same subnet should not see a\ndecrement on the initial TTL. A packet might appear it is from the same\nsubnet but it actually isn\u0026apos;t especially in modern environments with\ncontainers and virtual switching.\n\nRemove the device dereference and interface loop. Replace the logic with\na switch statement that evaluates the TTL according to the ttl_check.(CVE-2026-52998)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnetfilter: conntrack: remove sprintf usage\n\nReplace it with scnprintf, the buffer sizes are expected to be large enough\nto hold the result, no need for snprintf+overflow check.\n\nIncrease buffer size in mangle_content_len() while at it.\n\nBUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in vsnprintf+0xea5/0x1270\nWrite of size 1 at addr [..]\n vsnprintf+0xea5/0x1270\n sprintf+0xb1/0xe0\n mangle_content_len+0x1ac/0x280\n nf_nat_sdp_session+0x1cc/0x240\n process_sdp+0x8f8/0xb80\n process_invite_request+0x108/0x2b0\n process_sip_msg+0x5da/0xf50\n sip_help_tcp+0x45e/0x780\n nf_confirm+0x34d/0x990\n [..](CVE-2026-53002)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ngfs2: add some missing log locking\n\nFunction gfs2_logd() calls the log flushing functions gfs2_ail1_start(),\ngfs2_ail1_wait(), and gfs2_ail1_empty() without holding sdp-\u0026gt;sd_log_flush_lock,\nbut these functions require exclusion against concurrent transactions.\n\nTo fix that, add a non-locking __gfs2_log_flush() function. Then, in\ngfs2_logd(), take sdp-\u0026gt;sd_log_flush_lock before calling the above mentioned log\nflushing functions and __gfs2_log_flush().(CVE-2026-53049)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nBluetooth: fix locking in hci_conn_request_evt() with HCI_PROTO_DEFER\n\nWhen protocol sets HCI_PROTO_DEFER, hci_conn_request_evt() calls\nhci_connect_cfm(conn) without hdev-\u0026gt;lock. Generally hci_connect_cfm()\nassumes it is held, and if conn is deleted concurrently -\u0026gt; UAF.\n\nOnly SCO and ISO set HCI_PROTO_DEFER and only for defer setup listen,\nand HCI_EV_CONN_REQUEST is not generated for ISO. In the non-deferred\nlistening socket code paths, hci_connect_cfm(conn) is called with\nhdev-\u0026gt;lock held.\n\nFix by holding the lock.(CVE-2026-53072)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbus: fsl-mc: use generic driver_override infrastructure\n\nWhen a driver is probed through __driver_attach(), the bus\u0026apos; match()\ncallback is called without the device lock held, thus accessing the\ndriver_override field without a lock, which can cause a UAF.\n\nFix this by using the driver-core driver_override infrastructure taking\ncare of proper locking internally.\n\nNote that calling match() from __driver_attach() without the device lock\nheld is intentional. [1](CVE-2026-53115)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nUSB: serial: kl5kusb105: fix bulk-out buffer overflow\n\nklsi_105_prepare_write_buffer() is called by the generic write path\nwith the bulk-out buffer and its size (bulk_out_size, 64 bytes). It\nstores a two-byte length header at the start of the buffer and copies\nthe payload from the write fifo starting at buf + KLSI_HDR_LEN, but\npasses the full buffer size as the number of bytes to copy:\n\n count = kfifo_out_locked(\u0026amp;port-\u0026gt;write_fifo, buf + KLSI_HDR_LEN,\n size, \u0026amp;port-\u0026gt;lock);\n\nWhen the fifo holds at least size bytes, size bytes are copied starting\ntwo bytes into the size-byte buffer, writing KLSI_HDR_LEN bytes past its\nend. Copy at most size - KLSI_HDR_LEN bytes instead, leaving room for\nthe header as safe_serial already does.\n\nWriting bulk_out_size or more bytes to the tty triggers a slab\nout-of-bounds write, observed with KASAN by emulating the device with\ndummy_hcd and raw-gadget:\n\n BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in kfifo_copy_out+0x83/0xc0\n Write of size 64 at addr ffff888112c62202 by task python3\n kfifo_copy_out\n klsi_105_prepare_write_buffer [kl5kusb105]\n usb_serial_generic_write_start [usbserial]\n Allocated by task 139:\n usb_serial_probe [usbserial]\n The buggy address is located 2 bytes inside of allocated 64-byte region\n\nThe out-of-bounds write no longer occurs with this change applied.(CVE-2026-53194)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nUSB: serial: io_ti: fix heap overflow in build_i2c_fw_hdr()\n\nbuild_i2c_fw_hdr() allocates a fixed-size buffer of\n(16*1024 - 512) + sizeof(struct ti_i2c_firmware_rec) bytes, then\ncopies le16_to_cpu(img_header-\u0026gt;Length) bytes into it without\nvalidating that Length fits within the available space after the\nfirmware record header.\n\nimg_header-\u0026gt;Length is a __le16 from the firmware file and can be\nup to 65535. check_fw_sanity() validates the total firmware size\nbut not img_header-\u0026gt;Length specifically.\n\nFix by rejecting images where img_header-\u0026gt;Length exceeds the\navailable destination space.(CVE-2026-53195)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nBluetooth: L2CAP: reject BR/EDR signaling packets over MTUsig\n\nnet/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c:l2cap_sig_channel() accepts BR/EDR\nsignaling packets up to the channel MTU and dispatches each command\nwithout enforcing the signaling MTU (MTUsig). A Bluetooth BR/EDR peer\nwithin radio range can send a fixed-channel CID 0x0001 packet that is\nlarger than MTUsig and contains many L2CAP_ECHO_REQ commands before\npairing. In a real-radio stock-kernel run, one 681-byte signaling\npacket containing 168 zero-length ECHO_REQ commands made the target\ntransmit 168 ECHO_RSP frames over about 220 ms.\n\nImpact: a Bluetooth BR/EDR peer within radio range, before pairing, can\nforce 168 ECHO_RSP frames from one 681-byte fixed-channel signaling\npacket containing packed ECHO_REQ commands.\n\nDefine Linux\u0026apos;s BR/EDR signaling MTU as the spec minimum of 48 bytes and\nreject any larger signaling packet with one L2CAP_COMMAND_REJECT_RSP\ncarrying L2CAP_REJ_MTU_EXCEEDED before any command is dispatched.\n\nThe Bluetooth Core spec wording for MTUExceeded says the reject\nidentifier shall match the first request command in the packet, and\nthat packets containing only responses shall be silently discarded.\nLinux intentionally deviates from that prescription: silently\ndiscarding desynchronizes the peer because the remote stack never\nlearns its responses were dropped, and locating the first request\ncommand requires walking command headers past MTUsig, i.e. processing\nbytes from a packet we have already decided is too large to process.\nWe therefore always emit one reject and use the identifier from the\nfirst command header, a single fixed-offset byte read.\n\nThe unrestricted BR/EDR signaling parser and ECHO_REQ response path both\ntrace to the initial git import; no later introducing commit is\navailable for a Fixes tag.(CVE-2026-53208)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ntcp: restrict SO_ATTACH_FILTER to priv users\n\nThis patch restricts the use of SO_ATTACH_FILTER (cBPF) on TCP sockets\nto users with CAP_NET_ADMIN capability.\n\nThis blocks potential side-channel attack where an unprivileged application\nattaches a filter to leak TCP sequence/acknowledgment numbers.(CVE-2026-53236)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnetlabel: validate unlabeled address and mask attribute lengths\n\nnetlbl_unlabel_addrinfo_get() used the address attribute length to\ndetermine whether the attribute data could be read as an IPv4 or IPv6\naddress, but did not independently validate the corresponding mask\nattribute length. A crafted Generic Netlink request could therefore\nprovide a valid IPv4/IPv6 address attribute with a shorter mask\nattribute, which would later be read as a full struct in_addr or\nstruct in6_addr.\n\nNLA_BINARY policy lengths are maximum lengths by default, so use\nNLA_POLICY_EXACT_LEN() for the unlabeled IPv4/IPv6 address and mask\nattributes. This rejects short attributes during policy validation and\nalso exposes the exact length requirements through policy introspection.(CVE-2026-53238)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet/802/mrp: fix vector attribute parsing in mrp_pdu_parse_vecattr\n\nIn mrp_pdu_parse_vecattr(), vector attribute events are encoded three\nper byte and valen tracks the number of events left to process.\n\nThe parser decrements valen after processing the first and second events\nfrom each event byte, but not after processing the third one. When valen\nis exactly a multiple of three, the loop continues after the last valid\nevent and consumes the next byte as a new event byte, applying a\nspurious event to the MRP applicant state.\n\nAdditionally, when valen is zero the parser unconditionally consumes\nattrlen bytes as FirstValue and advances the offset, even though per\nIEEE 802.1ak a VectorAttribute with only a LeaveAllEvent has valen of\nzero and no FirstValue or Vector fields. This corrupts the offset for\nsubsequent PDU parsing.\n\nAlso, when valen exceeds three the loop crosses byte boundaries but\nthe attribute value is not incremented between the last event of one\nbyte and the first event of the next. This causes the first event of\nthe next byte to use the same attribute value as the third event\nrather than the next consecutive value.\n\nDecrement valen after processing the third event, skip FirstValue\nconsumption when valen is zero, and increment the attribute value at\nthe end of each loop iteration.(CVE-2026-53245)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nipv4: restrict IPOPT_SSRR and IPOPT_LSRR options\n\nThis patch restricts setting Loose Source and Record Route (LSRR)\nand Strict Source and Record Route (SSRR) IP options to users\nwith CAP_NET_RAW capability.\n\nThis prevents unprivileged applications from forcing packets to route\nthrough attacker-controlled nodes to leak TCP ISN and possibly other\nprotocol information.\n\nWhile LSRR and SSRR are commonly filtered in many network environments,\nthey may still be supported and forwarded along some network paths.\n\nRFC 7126 (Recommendations on Filtering of IPv4 Packets Containing\nIPv4 Options) recommend to drop these options in 4.3 and 4.4.(CVE-2026-53249)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nBluetooth: fix memory leak in error path of hci_alloc_dev()\n\nEarly failures in Bluetooth HCI UART configuration leak SRCU percpu\nmemory.\n\nWhen device initialization fails before hci_register_dev() completes,\nthe HCI_UNREGISTER flag is never set. As a result, when the device\nreference count reaches zero, bt_host_release() evaluates this flag as\nfalse and falls back to a direct kfree(hdev).\n\nBecause hci_release_dev() is bypassed, the SRCU struct initialized\nearly in hci_alloc_dev() is never cleaned up, resulting in a leak of\npercpu memory.\n\nFix the leak by explicitly calling cleanup_srcu_struct() in the\nfallback (unregistered) branch of bt_host_release() before freeing\nthe device.(CVE-2026-53252)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnetfilter: bridge: make ebt_snat ARP rewrite writable\n\nThe ebtables SNAT target keeps the Ethernet source address rewrite\nbehind skb_ensure_writable(skb, 0). This is intentional: at the bridge\nebtables hooks the Ethernet header is addressed through\nskb_mac_header()/eth_hdr(), while skb-\u0026gt;data points at the Ethernet\npayload. Asking skb_ensure_writable() for ETH_HLEN bytes would check\nthe payload, not the Ethernet header, and would reintroduce the small\npacket regression fixed by commit 63137bc5882a.\n\nHowever, the optional ARP sender hardware address rewrite is different.\nIt writes through skb_store_bits() at an offset relative to skb-\u0026gt;data:\n\n skb_store_bits(skb, sizeof(struct arphdr), info-\u0026gt;mac, ETH_ALEN)\n\nskb_header_pointer() only safely reads the ARP header; it does not make\nthe later sender hardware address range writable. If that range is\nstill held in a nonlinear skb fragment backed by a splice-imported file\npage, skb_store_bits() maps the frag page and copies the new MAC address\ndirectly into it.\n\nEnsure the ARP SHA range is writable before reading the ARP header and\nbefore calling skb_store_bits().(CVE-2026-53266)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnetfilter: conntrack_irc: fix possible out-of-bounds read\n\nWhen parsing fails after we\u0026apos;ve matched the command string we\nshould bail out instead of trying to match a different command.\n\nThis helper should be deprecated, given prevalence of TLS I doubt it has\nany relevance in 2026.(CVE-2026-53268)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnetfilter: synproxy: add mutex to guard hook reference counting\n\nAs the synproxy infrastructure register netfilter hooks on-demand when a\nuser adds the first iptables target or nftables expression, if done\nconcurrently they can race each other.\n\nIntroduce a mutex to serialize the refcount control blocks access from\nboth frontends. While a per namespace mutex might be more efficient, it\nis not needed for target/expression like SYNPROXY.(CVE-2026-53269)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nipvs: clear the svc scheduler ptr early on edit\n\nip_vs_edit_service() while unbinding the old scheduler clears\nthe svc-\u0026gt;scheduler ptr after the scheduler module initiates\nRCU callbacks. This can cause packets to use the old\nscheduler at the time when svc-\u0026gt;sched_data is already freed\nafter RCU grace period.\n\nFix it by clearing the ptr early in ip_vs_unbind_scheduler(),\nbefore the done_service method schedules any RCU callbacks.\n\nAlso, if the new scheduler fails to initialize when replacing\nthe old scheduler, try to restore the old scheduler while still\nreturning the error code.(CVE-2026-53270)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nipv6: mcast: Fix use-after-free when processing MLD queries\n\nWhen processing an MLD query, a pointer to the multicast group address\nis retrieved when initially parsing the packet. This pointer is later\ndereferenced without being reloaded despite the fact that the skb header\nmight have been reallocated following the pskb_may_pull() calls, leading\nto a use-after-free [1].\n\nFix by copying the multicast group address when the packet is initially\nparsed.\n\n[1]\nBUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __mld_query_work (net/ipv6/mcast.c:1512)\nRead of size 8 at addr ffff8881154b8e90 by task kworker/4:1/118\n\nWorkqueue: mld mld_query_work\nCall Trace:\n\u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\ndump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:94 lib/dump_stack.c:120)\nprint_address_description.constprop.0 (mm/kasan/report.c:378)\nprint_report (mm/kasan/report.c:482)\nkasan_report (mm/kasan/report.c:595)\n__mld_query_work (net/ipv6/mcast.c:1512)\nmld_query_work (net/ipv6/mcast.c:1563)\nprocess_one_work (kernel/workqueue.c:3314)\nworker_thread (kernel/workqueue.c:3397 kernel/workqueue.c:3478)\nkthread (kernel/kthread.c:436)\nret_from_fork (arch/x86/kernel/process.c:158)\nret_from_fork_asm (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:245)\n\u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\n\n[...]\n\nFreed by task 118:\nkasan_save_stack (mm/kasan/common.c:57)\nkasan_save_track (mm/kasan/common.c:78)\nkasan_save_free_info (mm/kasan/generic.c:584)\n__kasan_slab_free (mm/kasan/common.c:253 mm/kasan/common.c:285)\nkfree (./include/linux/kasan.h:235 mm/slub.c:2689 mm/slub.c:6251 mm/slub.c:6566)\npskb_expand_head (net/core/skbuff.c:2335)\n__pskb_pull_tail (net/core/skbuff.c:2878 (discriminator 4))\n__mld_query_work (net/ipv6/mcast.c:1495 (discriminator 1))\nmld_query_work (net/ipv6/mcast.c:1563)\nprocess_one_work (kernel/workqueue.c:3314)\nworker_thread (kernel/workqueue.c:3397 kernel/workqueue.c:3478)\nkthread (kernel/kthread.c:436)\nret_from_fork (arch/x86/kernel/process.c:158)\nret_from_fork_asm (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:245)(CVE-2026-53275)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nBluetooth: fix UAF in l2cap_sock_cleanup_listen() vs l2cap_conn_del()\n\nbt_accept_dequeue() unlinks a not-yet-accepted child from the parent\naccept queue and release_sock()s it before returning, so the returned\nsk has no caller reference and is unlocked.\n\nl2cap_sock_cleanup_listen() walks these children on listening-socket\nclose. A concurrent HCI disconnect drives hci_rx_work -\u0026gt;\nl2cap_conn_del() which runs l2cap_chan_del() + l2cap_sock_kill() and\nfrees the child sk and its l2cap_chan; cleanup_listen() then uses both:\n\n BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in l2cap_sock_kill\n l2cap_sock_kill / l2cap_sock_cleanup_listen / __x64_sys_close\n Freed by: l2cap_conn_del -\u0026gt; l2cap_sock_close_cb -\u0026gt; l2cap_sock_kill\n\nThis is distinct from the two fixes already in this area: commit\ne83f5e24da741 (\u0026quot;Bluetooth: serialize accept_q access\u0026quot;) serialises the\naccept_q list/poll and takes temporary refs inside bt_accept_dequeue(),\nand CVE-2025-39860 serialises the userspace close()/accept() race by\ncalling cleanup_listen() under lock_sock() in l2cap_sock_release().\nNeither covers l2cap_conn_del() running from hci_rx_work, so this UAF\nstill reproduces on current bluetooth/master.\n\nTake the reference at the source: bt_accept_dequeue() does sock_hold()\nwhile sk is still locked, before release_sock(); callers sock_put().\ncleanup_listen() pins the chan with l2cap_chan_hold_unless_zero() under\na brief child sk lock (serialising vs l2cap_sock_teardown_cb()), drops\nit before l2cap_chan_lock(), and skips a duplicate l2cap_sock_kill() on\nSOCK_DEAD. conn-\u0026gt;lock is not taken here: cleanup_listen() runs under\nthe parent sk lock and that would invert\nconn-\u0026gt;lock -\u0026gt; chan-\u0026gt;lock -\u0026gt; sk_lock (lockdep).\n\nKASAN/SMP: an unprivileged listen/close vs HCI-disconnect race produced\n12 use-after-free reports per run before this change; 0, and no lockdep\nreport, over 1600+ raced iterations after it on bluetooth/master.(CVE-2026-53357)",
"id": "OESA-2026-2930",
"modified": "2026-08-06T11:11:50Z",
"published": "2026-07-09T11:11:50Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2026-2930"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43052"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43110"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43111"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43206"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-45892"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-45899"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-45912"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-52923"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-52943"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-52963"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-52970"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-52986"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-52991"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-52998"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53002"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53049"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53072"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53115"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53194"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53195"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53208"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53236"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53238"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53245"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53249"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53252"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53266"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53268"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53269"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53270"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53275"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53357"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2026-43052",
"CVE-2026-43110",
"CVE-2026-43111",
"CVE-2026-43206",
"CVE-2026-45892",
"CVE-2026-45899",
"CVE-2026-45912",
"CVE-2026-52923",
"CVE-2026-52943",
"CVE-2026-52963",
"CVE-2026-52970",
"CVE-2026-52986",
"CVE-2026-52991",
"CVE-2026-52998",
"CVE-2026-53002",
"CVE-2026-53049",
"CVE-2026-53072",
"CVE-2026-53115",
"CVE-2026-53194",
"CVE-2026-53195",
"CVE-2026-53208",
"CVE-2026-53236",
"CVE-2026-53238",
"CVE-2026-53245",
"CVE-2026-53249",
"CVE-2026-53252",
"CVE-2026-53266",
"CVE-2026-53268",
"CVE-2026-53269",
"CVE-2026-53270",
"CVE-2026-53275",
"CVE-2026-53357"
]
}
OESA-2026-3454 (CVE-2026-43153)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2026-08-20 09:59 – Updated: 2026-08-20 09:59 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
xfs: remove xfs_attr_leaf_hasname
The calling convention of xfs_attr_leaf_hasname() is problematic, because it returns a NULL buffer when xfs_attr3_leaf_read fails, a valid buffer when xfs_attr3_leaf_lookup_int returns -ENOATTR or -EEXIST, and a non-NULL buffer pointer for an already released buffer when xfs_attr3_leaf_lookup_int fails with other error values.
Fix this by simply open coding xfs_attr_leaf_hasname in the callers, so that the buffer release code is done by each caller of xfs_attr3_leaf_read.(CVE-2026-43153)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
x86/kexec: Disable KCOV instrumentation after load_segments()
The load_segments() function changes segment registers, invalidating GS base (which KCOV relies on for per-cpu data). When CONFIG_KCOV is enabled, any subsequent instrumented C code call (e.g. native_gdt_invalidate()) begins crashing the kernel in an endless loop.
To reproduce the problem, it's sufficient to do kexec on a KCOV-instrumented kernel:
$ kexec -l /boot/otherKernel $ kexec -e
The real-world context for this problem is enabling crash dump collection in syzkaller. For this, the tool loads a panic kernel before fuzzing and then calls makedumpfile after the panic. This workflow requires both CONFIG_KEXEC and CONFIG_KCOV to be enabled simultaneously.
Adding safeguards directly to the KCOV fast-path (__sanitizer_cov_trace_pc()) is also undesirable as it would introduce an extra performance overhead.
Disabling instrumentation for the individual functions would be too fragile, so disable KCOV instrumentation for the entire machine_kexec_64.c and physaddr.c. If coverage-guided fuzzing ever needs these components in the future, other approaches should be considered.
The problem is not relevant for 32 bit kernels as CONFIG_KCOV is not supported there.
bp: Space out comment for better readability.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
apparmor: Fix & Optimize table creation from possibly unaligned memory
Source blob may come from userspace and might be unaligned. Try to optize the copying process by avoiding unaligned memory accesses.
- Added Fixes tag
- Added "Fix &" to description as this doesn't just optimize but fixes a potential unaligned memory access jj: remove duplicate word "convert" in comment trigger checkpatch warning
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nvmet-tcp: fix race between ICReq handling and queue teardown
nvmet_tcp_handle_icreq() updates queue->state after sending an Initialization Connection Response (ICResp), but it does so without serializing against target-side queue teardown.
If an NVMe/TCP host sends an Initialization Connection Request (ICReq) and immediately closes the connection, target-side teardown may start in softirq context before io_work drains the already buffered ICReq. In that case, nvmet_tcp_schedule_release_queue() sets queue->state to NVMET_TCP_Q_DISCONNECTING and drops the queue reference under state_lock.
If io_work later processes that ICReq, nvmet_tcp_handle_icreq() can still overwrite the state back to NVMET_TCP_Q_LIVE. That defeats the DISCONNECTING-state guard in nvmet_tcp_schedule_release_queue() and allows a later socket state change to re-enter teardown and issue a second kref_put() on an already released queue.
The ICResp send failure path has the same problem. If teardown has already moved the queue to DISCONNECTING, a send error can still overwrite the state with NVMET_TCP_Q_FAILED, again reopening the window for a second teardown path to drop the queue reference.
Fix this by serializing both post-send state transitions with state_lock and bailing out if teardown has already started.
Use -ESHUTDOWN as an internal sentinel for that bail-out path rather than propagating it as a transport error like -ECONNRESET. Keep nvmet_tcp_socket_error() setting rcv_state to NVMET_TCP_RECV_ERR before honoring that sentinel so receive-side parsing stays quiesced until the existing release path completes.(CVE-2026-46135)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: nf_tables: use list_del_rcu for netlink hooks
nft_netdev_unregister_hooks and __nft_unregister_flowtable_net_hooks need to use list_del_rcu(), this list can be walked by concurrent dumpers.
Add a new helper and use it consistently.(CVE-2026-46324)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
RDMA: During rereg_mr ensure that REREG_ACCESS is compatible
If IB_MR_REREG_ACCESS changes from RO to RW then the umem has to be re-evaluated to ensure it is properly pinned as RW. Since the umem is hidden inside each driver's mr struct add a ib_umem_check_rereg() function that each driver has to call before processing IB_MR_REREG_ACCESS.
mlx4 has to retain its duplicate ib_access_writable check because it implements IB_MR_REREG_ACCESS | IB_MR_REREG_TRANS by changing both items in place sequentially while the MR is live, so it will continue to not support this combination.(CVE-2026-52908)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: serialize accept_q access
bt_sock_poll() walks the accept queue without synchronization, while child teardown can unlink the same socket and drop its last reference. The unsynchronized accept queue walk has existed since the initial Bluetooth import.
Protect accept_q with a dedicated lock for queue updates and polling. Also rework bt_accept_dequeue() to take temporary child references under the queue lock before dropping it and locking the child socket.(CVE-2026-52918)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipc: limit next_id allocation to the valid ID range
The checkpoint/restore sysctl path can request the next SysV IPC id through ids->next_id. ipc_idr_alloc() currently forwards that request to idr_alloc() with an open-ended upper bound.
If the valid tail of the SysV IPC id space is full, the allocation can spill beyond ipc_mni. The returned SysV IPC id still uses the normal index encoding, so later lookup and removal can target the wrong slot. This leaves the real IDR entry behind and breaks the IDR state for the object.
The bug is in ipc_idr_alloc() in the checkpoint/restore path.
-
ids->next_id is passed to:
idr_alloc(&ids->ipcs_idr, new, ipcid_to_idx(next_id), 0, ...)
-
The zero upper bound makes the allocation effectively open-ended. Once the valid SysV IPC tail is occupied, idr_alloc() can spill past ipc_mni and allocate an entry beyond the valid IPC id range.
-
The new object id is still encoded with the narrower SysV IPC index width:
new->id = (new->seq << ipcmni_seq_shift()) + idx
-
Later removal goes through ipc_rmid(), which uses:
ipcid_to_idx(ipcp->id)
That truncates the real IDR index. An object actually stored at a high index can then be removed as if it lived at a low in-range index.
-
For shared memory, shm_destroy() frees the current object anyway, but the real high IDR slot is left behind as a dangling pointer.
-
A subsequent walk of /proc/sysvipc/shm reaches the stale IDR entry and dereferences freed memory.
Prevent this by bounding the requested allocation to ipc_mni so the checkpoint/restore path fails once the valid range is exhausted.(CVE-2026-52923)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipc/shm: serialize orphan cleanup with shm_nattch updates
shm_destroy_orphaned() walks the shm idr under shm_ids(ns).rwsem, but that does not serialize all fields tested by shm_may_destroy(). In particular, shm_nattch is updated while holding shm_perm.lock, and attach paths can do that without holding the rwsem.
Do not decide that an orphaned segment is unused before taking the object lock. Move the shm_may_destroy() check under shm_perm.lock, matching the other destroy paths, and unlock the segment when it no longer qualifies for removal.(CVE-2026-52930)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
i2c: dev: prevent integer overflow in I2C_TIMEOUT ioctl
While fuzzing with Syzkaller, a persistent schedule_timeout: wrong
timeout value warning was observed, accompanied by SMBus controller
state machine corruption.
The I2C_TIMEOUT ioctl accepts a user-provided timeout in multiples of 10 ms. The user argument is checked against INT_MAX, but it is subsequently multiplied by 10 before being passed to msecs_to_jiffies().
A malicious user can pass a large value (e.g., 429496729) that passes
the arg > INT_MAX check but overflows when multiplied by 10. This
results in a truncated 32-bit unsigned value that bypasses the
internal (int)m < 0 check in msecs_to_jiffies().
The truncated value is then assigned to client->adapter->timeout
(a signed 32-bit int), which is reinterpreted as a negative number.
When passed to wait_for_completion_timeout(), this negative value
undergoes sign extension to a 64-bit unsigned long, triggering the
schedule_timeout warning and causing premature returns. This leaves
the SMBus state machine in an unrecoverable state, constituting a
local Denial of Service (DoS).
Fix this by bounding the user argument to INT_MAX / 10.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
iommu/vt-d: Fix oops due to out of scope access
Below oops triggers when kill QEMU process:
Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x7fffffff844eaaa7: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI Call Trace: <TASK> do_raw_spin_lock+0xaa/0xc0 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x21/0x40 domain_remove_dev_pasid+0x52/0x160 intel_nested_set_dev_pasid+0x1b9/0x1e0 __iommu_set_group_pasid+0x56/0x120 pci_dev_reset_iommu_done+0xe3/0x180 pcie_flr+0x65/0x160 __pci_reset_function_locked+0x5b/0x120 vfio_pci_core_close_device+0x63/0xe0 [vfio_pci_core] vfio_df_close+0x4f/0xa0 vfio_df_unbind_iommufd+0x2d/0x60 vfio_device_fops_release+0x3e/0x40 __fput+0xe5/0x2c0 task_work_run+0x58/0xa0 do_exit+0x2c8/0x600 do_group_exit+0x2f/0xa0 get_signal+0x863/0x8c0 arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x24/0x100 exit_to_user_mode_loop+0x87/0x380 do_syscall_64+0x2ff/0x11e0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
The global static blocked domain is a dummy domain without corresponding dmar_domain structure, accessing beyond iommu_domain structure triggers oops easily. Fix it by return early in domain_remove_dev_pasid() like identity domain.(CVE-2026-52953)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ceph: fix BUG_ON in __ceph_build_xattrs_blob() due to stale blob size
The generic/642 test-case can reproduce the kernel crash:
[40243.605254] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [40243.605956] kernel BUG at fs/ceph/xattr.c:918! [40243.607142] Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI [40243.608067] CPU: 7 UID: 0 PID: 498762 Comm: kworker/7:1 Not tainted 7.0.0-rc7+ #3 PREEMPT(full) [40243.609700] Hardware name: QEMU Ubuntu 25.10 PC v2 (i440FX + PIIX, + 10.1 machine, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014 [40243.611820] Workqueue: ceph-msgr ceph_con_workfn [40243.612715] RIP: 0010:__ceph_build_xattrs_blob+0x1b8/0x1e0 [40243.613731] Code: 0f 84 82 fe ff ff e9 cf 8e 56 ff 48 8d 65 e8 31 c0 5b 41 5c 41 5d 5d 31 d2 31 c9 31 f6 31 ff 45 31 c0 45 31 c9 c3 cc cc cc cc <0f> 0b 4c 8b 62 08 41 8b 85 24 07 00 00 49 83 c4 04 41 89 44 24 fc [40243.616888] RSP: 0018:ffffcc80c4d4b688 EFLAGS: 00010287 [40243.617773] RAX: 0000000000010026 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 0000000000000000 [40243.618928] RDX: ffff8a773798dee0 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 [40243.620158] RBP: ffffcc80c4d4b6a0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [40243.621573] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8a75f3b58000 [40243.622907] R13: ffff8a75f3b58000 R14: 0000000000000080 R15: 000000000000bffd [40243.624054] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8a787d1b4000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [40243.625331] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [40243.626269] CR2: 000072f390b623c0 CR3: 000000011c02a003 CR4: 0000000000372ef0 [40243.627408] Call Trace: [40243.627839] <TASK> [40243.628188] __prep_cap+0x3fd/0x4a0 [40243.628789] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4e/0xe0 [40243.629474] ceph_check_caps+0x46a/0xc80 [40243.630094] ? __lock_acquire+0x4a2/0x2650 [40243.630773] ? find_held_lock+0x31/0x90 [40243.631347] ? handle_cap_grant+0x79f/0x1060 [40243.632068] ? lock_release+0xd9/0x300 [40243.632696] ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x3e/0x340 [40243.633429] ? lock_release+0xd9/0x300 [40243.634052] handle_cap_grant+0xcf6/0x1060 [40243.634745] ceph_handle_caps+0x122b/0x2110 [40243.635415] mds_dispatch+0x5bd/0x2160 [40243.636034] ? ceph_con_process_message+0x65/0x190 [40243.636828] ? lock_release+0xd9/0x300 [40243.637431] ceph_con_process_message+0x7a/0x190 [40243.638184] ? kfree+0x311/0x4f0 [40243.638749] ? kfree+0x311/0x4f0 [40243.639268] process_message+0x16/0x1a0 [40243.639915] ? sg_free_table+0x39/0x90 [40243.640572] ceph_con_v2_try_read+0xf58/0x2120 [40243.641255] ? lock_acquire+0xc8/0x300 [40243.641863] ceph_con_workfn+0x151/0x820 [40243.642493] process_one_work+0x22f/0x630 [40243.643093] ? process_one_work+0x254/0x630 [40243.643770] worker_thread+0x1e2/0x400 [40243.644332] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 [40243.645020] kthread+0x109/0x140 [40243.645560] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [40243.646125] ret_from_fork+0x3f8/0x480 [40243.646752] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [40243.647316] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [40243.647919] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [40243.648556] </TASK> [40243.648902] Modules linked in: overlay hctr2 libpolyval chacha libchacha adiantum libnh libpoly1305 essiv intel_rapl_msr intel_rapl_common intel_uncore_frequency_common skx_edac_common nfit kvm_intel kvm irqbypass joydev ghash_clmulni_intel aesni_intel rapl input_leds mac_hid psmouse vga16fb serio_raw vgastate floppy i2c_piix4 pata_acpi bochs qemu_fw_cfg i2c_smbus sch_fq_codel rbd dm_crypt msr parport_pc ppdev lp parport efi_pstore [40243.654766] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
Commit d93231a6bc8a ("ceph: prevent a client from exceeding the MDS maximum xattr size") moved the required_blob_size computation to before the __build_xattrs() call, introducing a race.
__build_xattrs() releases and reacquires i_ceph_lock during execution. In that window, handle_cap_grant() may update i_xattrs.blob with a newer MDS-provided blob and bump i_xattrs.version. When __bui ---truncated---(CVE-2026-52961)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
fsnotify: fix inode reference leak in fsnotify_recalc_mask()
fsnotify_recalc_mask() fails to handle the return value of __fsnotify_recalc_mask(), which may return an inode pointer that needs to be released via fsnotify_drop_object() when the connector's HAS_IREF flag transitions from set to cleared.
This manifests as a hung task with the following call trace:
INFO: task umount:1234 blocked for more than 120 seconds. Call Trace: __schedule schedule fsnotify_sb_delete generic_shutdown_super kill_anon_super cleanup_mnt task_work_run do_exit do_group_exit
The race window that triggers the iref leak:
Thread A (adding mark) Thread B (removing mark) ────────────────────── ──────────────────────── fsnotify_add_mark_locked(): fsnotify_add_mark_list(): spin_lock(conn->lock) add mark_B(evictable) to list spin_unlock(conn->lock) return
/* ---- gap: no lock held ---- */
fsnotify_detach_mark(mark_A):
spin_lock(mark_A->lock)
clear ATTACHED flag on mark_A
spin_unlock(mark_A->lock)
fsnotify_put_mark(mark_A)
fsnotify_recalc_mask():
spin_lock(conn->lock)
__fsnotify_recalc_mask():
/* mark_A skipped: ATTACHED cleared */
/* only mark_B(evictable) remains */
want_iref = false
has_iref = true /* not yet cleared */
-> HAS_IREF transitions true -> false
-> returns inode pointer
spin_unlock(conn->lock)
/* BUG: return value discarded!
* iput() and fsnotify_put_sb_watched_objects()
* are never called */
Fix this by deferring the transition true -> false of HAS_IREF flag from fsnotify_recalc_mask() (Thread A) to fsnotify_put_mark() (thread B).(CVE-2026-52990)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
erofs: unify lcn as u64 for 32-bit platforms
As sashiko reported [1], lcn was typed as unsigned long (or
unsigned int sometimes), which is only 32 bits wide on 32-bit
platforms, which causes (lcn << lclusterbits) to be truncated
at 4 GiB.
In order to consolidate the logic, just use u64 consistently
around the codebase.
[1] https://sashiko.dev/r/20260420034612.1899973-1-hsiangkao%40linux.alibaba.com(CVE-2026-53015)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
iommu/amd: Fix clone_alias() to use the original device's devid
Currently clone_alias() assumes first argument (pdev) is always the original device pointer. This function is called by pci_for_each_dma_alias() which based on topology decides to send original or alias device details in first argument.
This meant that the source devid used to look up and copy the DTE may be incorrect, leading to wrong or stale DTE entries being propagated to alias device.
Fix this by passing the original pdev as the opaque data argument to both the direct clone_alias() call and pci_for_each_dma_alias(). Inside clone_alias(), retrieve the original device from data and compute devid from it.(CVE-2026-53053)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
USB: serial: kl5kusb105: fix bulk-out buffer overflow
klsi_105_prepare_write_buffer() is called by the generic write path with the bulk-out buffer and its size (bulk_out_size, 64 bytes). It stores a two-byte length header at the start of the buffer and copies the payload from the write fifo starting at buf + KLSI_HDR_LEN, but passes the full buffer size as the number of bytes to copy:
count = kfifo_out_locked(&port->write_fifo, buf + KLSI_HDR_LEN, size, &port->lock);
When the fifo holds at least size bytes, size bytes are copied starting two bytes into the size-byte buffer, writing KLSI_HDR_LEN bytes past its end. Copy at most size - KLSI_HDR_LEN bytes instead, leaving room for the header as safe_serial already does.
Writing bulk_out_size or more bytes to the tty triggers a slab out-of-bounds write, observed with KASAN by emulating the device with dummy_hcd and raw-gadget:
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in kfifo_copy_out+0x83/0xc0 Write of size 64 at addr ffff888112c62202 by task python3 kfifo_copy_out klsi_105_prepare_write_buffer [kl5kusb105] usb_serial_generic_write_start [usbserial] Allocated by task 139: usb_serial_probe [usbserial] The buggy address is located 2 bytes inside of allocated 64-byte region
The out-of-bounds write no longer occurs with this change applied.(CVE-2026-53194)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
USB: serial: io_ti: fix heap overflow in get_manuf_info()
get_manuf_info() reads le16_to_cpu(rom_desc->Size) bytes from the device I2C EEPROM into a buffer allocated with kmalloc_obj(), which is sizeof(struct edge_ti_manuf_descriptor) = 10 bytes.
The Size field comes from the device and is only validated (in check_i2c_image()) to make sure the descriptor fits within TI_MAX_I2C_SIZE (16384 bytes), not against the destination buffer size. A malicious USB device can therefore set Size to any value up to 16377, causing a heap overflow of up to 16367 bytes when plugged into a host running this driver.
valid_csum() is called after read_rom() and also iterates buffer[0..Size-1], compounding the out-of-bounds access.
Fix by rejecting descriptors with unexpected length before calling read_rom().
johan: amend commit message; also check for short descriptors
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
l2tp: pppol2tp: hold reference to session in pppol2tp_ioctl()
pppol2tp_ioctl() read sock->sk->sk_user_data directly without any locks or reference counting. If a controllable sleep was induced during copy_from_user() (e.g. via a userfaultfd page fault sleep), a concurrent socket close could trigger pppol2tp_session_close() asynchronously. This frees the l2tp_session structure via the l2tp_session_del_work workqueue. Upon resuming, the ioctl thread dereferences the stale session pointer, resulting in a Use-After-Free (UAF).
Fix this by securely fetching the session reference using the RCU-safe, refcounted helper pppol2tp_sock_to_session(sk) on entry. This locks the session's refcount across the sleep. We structured the function to exit via standard err breaks, guaranteeing that l2tp_session_put() is cleanly called on all return paths to drop the reference.
To preserve existing behavior we validate the session and its magic signature only for the specific L2TP commands that require it. This ensures that generic/unknown ioctls called on an unconnected socket still return -ENOIOCTLCMD and correctly fall back to generic handlers (e.g. in sock_do_ioctl()).(CVE-2026-53262)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: Wrap DCN32 phantom-plane allocation in DC_RUN_WITH_PREEMPTION_ENABLED
[Why] dcn32_validate_bandwidth() wraps dcn32_internal_validate_bw() with DC_FP_START()/DC_FP_END(). In x86 non-RT, DC_FP_START takes fpregs_lock(), which disables local softirqs.
The DML1 path through dcn32_enable_phantom_plane() calls kvzalloc() to allocate ~335 KiB for dc_plane_state. This triggers the vmalloc path, which calls BUG_ON(in_interrupt()) because it's invoked within the FPU-enabled (softirq disabled) region, leading to a kernel crash.
[How] Wrap the dc_state_create_phantom_plane() call with the DC_RUN_WITH_PREEMPTION_ENABLED() macro to allow preemption during this memory allocation.
(cherry picked from commit 885ccbef7b94a8b38f69c4211c679021aa27ad11)(CVE-2026-53285)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: Avoid NULL dereference in dc_dmub_srv error paths
In dc_dmub_srv_log_diagnostic_data() and dc_dmub_srv_enable_dpia_trace().
Both functions check:
if (!dc_dmub_srv || !dc_dmub_srv->dmub)
and then call DC_LOG_ERROR() inside that block.
DC_LOG_ERROR() uses dc_dmub_srv->ctx internally. So if dc_dmub_srv is NULL, the logging itself can dereference a NULL pointer and cause a crash.
Fix this by splitting the checks.
First check if dc_dmub_srv is NULL and return immediately. Then check dc_dmub_srv->dmub and log the error only when dc_dmub_srv is valid.
Fixes the below: ../display/dc/dc_dmub_srv.c:962 dc_dmub_srv_log_diagnostic_data() error: we previously assumed 'dc_dmub_srv' could be null (see line 961) ../display/dc/dc_dmub_srv.c:1167 dc_dmub_srv_enable_dpia_trace() error: we previously assumed 'dc_dmub_srv' could be null (see line 1166)(CVE-2026-53313)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
padata: Put CPU offline callback in ONLINE section to allow failure
syzbot reported the following warning:
DEAD callback error for CPU1
WARNING: kernel/cpu.c:1463 at _cpu_down+0x759/0x1020 kernel/cpu.c:1463, CPU#0: syz.0.1960/14614
at commit 4ae12d8bd9a8 ("Merge tag 'kbuild-fixes-7.0-2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kbuild/linux") which tglx traced to padata_cpu_dead() given it's the only sub-CPUHP_TEARDOWN_CPU callback that returns an error.
Failure isn't allowed in hotplug states before CPUHP_TEARDOWN_CPU so move the CPU offline callback to the ONLINE section where failure is possible.(CVE-2026-53314)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/virtio: Fix driver removal with disabled KMS
DRM atomic and modesetting aren't initialized if virtio-gpu driver built with disabled KMS, leading to access of uninitialized data on driver removal/unbinding and crashing kernel. Fix it by skipping shutting down atomic core with unavailable KMS.(CVE-2026-53347)
| URL | Type | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"bpftool-6.6.0-145.1.22.159.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.1.22.159.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-6.6.0-145.1.22.159.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.1.22.159.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-6.6.0-145.1.22.159.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-6.6.0-145.1.22.159.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-6.6.0-145.1.22.159.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-6.6.0-145.1.22.159.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-6.6.0-145.1.22.159.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.1.22.159.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-6.6.0-145.1.22.159.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-6.6.0-145.1.22.159.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.1.22.159.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-6.6.0-145.1.22.159.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.1.22.159.oe2403sp1.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-6.6.0-145.1.22.159.oe2403sp1.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"bpftool-6.6.0-145.1.22.159.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.1.22.159.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-6.6.0-145.1.22.159.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.1.22.159.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-6.6.0-145.1.22.159.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-6.6.0-145.1.22.159.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-6.6.0-145.1.22.159.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-6.6.0-145.1.22.159.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-6.6.0-145.1.22.159.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.1.22.159.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-6.6.0-145.1.22.159.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-6.6.0-145.1.22.159.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.1.22.159.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-6.6.0-145.1.22.159.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.1.22.159.oe2403sp1.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:24.03-LTS-SP1",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP1"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "6.6.0-145.1.22.159.oe2403sp1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "Critical"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nxfs: remove xfs_attr_leaf_hasname\n\nThe calling convention of xfs_attr_leaf_hasname() is problematic, because\nit returns a NULL buffer when xfs_attr3_leaf_read fails, a valid buffer\nwhen xfs_attr3_leaf_lookup_int returns -ENOATTR or -EEXIST, and a\nnon-NULL buffer pointer for an already released buffer when\nxfs_attr3_leaf_lookup_int fails with other error values.\n\nFix this by simply open coding xfs_attr_leaf_hasname in the callers, so\nthat the buffer release code is done by each caller of\nxfs_attr3_leaf_read.(CVE-2026-43153)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nx86/kexec: Disable KCOV instrumentation after load_segments()\n\nThe load_segments() function changes segment registers, invalidating GS base\n(which KCOV relies on for per-cpu data). When CONFIG_KCOV is enabled, any\nsubsequent instrumented C code call (e.g. native_gdt_invalidate()) begins\ncrashing the kernel in an endless loop.\n\nTo reproduce the problem, it\u0026apos;s sufficient to do kexec on a KCOV-instrumented\nkernel:\n\n $ kexec -l /boot/otherKernel\n $ kexec -e\n\nThe real-world context for this problem is enabling crash dump collection in\nsyzkaller. For this, the tool loads a panic kernel before fuzzing and then\ncalls makedumpfile after the panic. This workflow requires both CONFIG_KEXEC\nand CONFIG_KCOV to be enabled simultaneously.\n\nAdding safeguards directly to the KCOV fast-path (__sanitizer_cov_trace_pc())\nis also undesirable as it would introduce an extra performance overhead.\n\nDisabling instrumentation for the individual functions would be too fragile,\nso disable KCOV instrumentation for the entire machine_kexec_64.c and\nphysaddr.c. If coverage-guided fuzzing ever needs these components in the\nfuture, other approaches should be considered.\n\nThe problem is not relevant for 32 bit kernels as CONFIG_KCOV is not supported\nthere.\n\n [ bp: Space out comment for better readability. ](CVE-2026-43331)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\napparmor: Fix \u0026amp; Optimize table creation from possibly unaligned memory\n\nSource blob may come from userspace and might be unaligned.\nTry to optize the copying process by avoiding unaligned memory accesses.\n\n- Added Fixes tag\n- Added \u0026quot;Fix \u0026amp;\u0026quot; to description as this doesn\u0026apos;t just optimize but fixes\n a potential unaligned memory access\n[jj: remove duplicate word \u0026quot;convert\u0026quot; in comment trigger checkpatch warning](CVE-2026-45893)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnvmet-tcp: fix race between ICReq handling and queue teardown\n\nnvmet_tcp_handle_icreq() updates queue-\u0026gt;state after sending an\nInitialization Connection Response (ICResp), but it does so without\nserializing against target-side queue teardown.\n\nIf an NVMe/TCP host sends an Initialization Connection Request\n(ICReq) and immediately closes the connection, target-side teardown\nmay start in softirq context before io_work drains the already\nbuffered ICReq. In that case, nvmet_tcp_schedule_release_queue()\nsets queue-\u0026gt;state to NVMET_TCP_Q_DISCONNECTING and drops the queue\nreference under state_lock.\n\nIf io_work later processes that ICReq, nvmet_tcp_handle_icreq() can\nstill overwrite the state back to NVMET_TCP_Q_LIVE. That defeats the\nDISCONNECTING-state guard in nvmet_tcp_schedule_release_queue() and\nallows a later socket state change to re-enter teardown and issue a\nsecond kref_put() on an already released queue.\n\nThe ICResp send failure path has the same problem. If teardown has\nalready moved the queue to DISCONNECTING, a send error can still\noverwrite the state with NVMET_TCP_Q_FAILED, again reopening the\nwindow for a second teardown path to drop the queue reference.\n\nFix this by serializing both post-send state transitions with\nstate_lock and bailing out if teardown has already started.\n\nUse -ESHUTDOWN as an internal sentinel for that bail-out path rather\nthan propagating it as a transport error like -ECONNRESET. Keep\nnvmet_tcp_socket_error() setting rcv_state to NVMET_TCP_RECV_ERR before\nhonoring that sentinel so receive-side parsing stays quiesced until the\nexisting release path completes.(CVE-2026-46135)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnetfilter: nf_tables: use list_del_rcu for netlink hooks\n\nnft_netdev_unregister_hooks and __nft_unregister_flowtable_net_hooks need\nto use list_del_rcu(), this list can be walked by concurrent dumpers.\n\nAdd a new helper and use it consistently.(CVE-2026-46324)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nRDMA: During rereg_mr ensure that REREG_ACCESS is compatible\n\nIf IB_MR_REREG_ACCESS changes from RO to RW then the umem has to be\nre-evaluated to ensure it is properly pinned as RW. Since the umem is\nhidden inside each driver\u0026apos;s mr struct add a ib_umem_check_rereg() function\nthat each driver has to call before processing IB_MR_REREG_ACCESS.\n\nmlx4 has to retain its duplicate ib_access_writable check because it\nimplements IB_MR_REREG_ACCESS | IB_MR_REREG_TRANS by changing both items\nin place sequentially while the MR is live, so it will continue to not\nsupport this combination.(CVE-2026-52908)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nBluetooth: serialize accept_q access\n\nbt_sock_poll() walks the accept queue without synchronization, while\nchild teardown can unlink the same socket and drop its last reference.\nThe unsynchronized accept queue walk has existed since the initial\nBluetooth import.\n\nProtect accept_q with a dedicated lock for queue updates and polling.\nAlso rework bt_accept_dequeue() to take temporary child references under\nthe queue lock before dropping it and locking the child socket.(CVE-2026-52918)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nipc: limit next_id allocation to the valid ID range\n\nThe checkpoint/restore sysctl path can request the next SysV IPC id\nthrough ids-\u0026gt;next_id. ipc_idr_alloc() currently forwards that request to\nidr_alloc() with an open-ended upper bound.\n\nIf the valid tail of the SysV IPC id space is full, the allocation can\nspill beyond ipc_mni. The returned SysV IPC id still uses the normal\nindex encoding, so later lookup and removal can target the wrong slot. \nThis leaves the real IDR entry behind and breaks the IDR state for the\nobject.\n\nThe bug is in ipc_idr_alloc() in the checkpoint/restore path.\n\n1. ids-\u0026gt;next_id is passed to:\n\n idr_alloc(\u0026amp;ids-\u0026gt;ipcs_idr, new, ipcid_to_idx(next_id), 0, ...)\n\n2. The zero upper bound makes the allocation effectively open-ended.\n Once the valid SysV IPC tail is occupied, idr_alloc() can spill past\n ipc_mni and allocate an entry beyond the valid IPC id range.\n\n3. The new object id is still encoded with the narrower SysV IPC index\n width:\n\n new-\u0026gt;id = (new-\u0026gt;seq \u0026lt;\u0026lt; ipcmni_seq_shift()) + idx\n\n4. Later removal goes through ipc_rmid(), which uses:\n\n ipcid_to_idx(ipcp-\u0026gt;id)\n\n That truncates the real IDR index. An object actually stored at a\n high index can then be removed as if it lived at a low in-range\n index.\n\n5. For shared memory, shm_destroy() frees the current object anyway, but\n the real high IDR slot is left behind as a dangling pointer.\n\n6. A subsequent walk of /proc/sysvipc/shm reaches the stale IDR entry\n and dereferences freed memory.\n\nPrevent this by bounding the requested allocation to ipc_mni so the\ncheckpoint/restore path fails once the valid range is exhausted.(CVE-2026-52923)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nipc/shm: serialize orphan cleanup with shm_nattch updates\n\nshm_destroy_orphaned() walks the shm idr under shm_ids(ns).rwsem, but that\ndoes not serialize all fields tested by shm_may_destroy(). In particular,\nshm_nattch is updated while holding shm_perm.lock, and attach paths can do\nthat without holding the rwsem.\n\nDo not decide that an orphaned segment is unused before taking the object\nlock. Move the shm_may_destroy() check under shm_perm.lock, matching the\nother destroy paths, and unlock the segment when it no longer qualifies\nfor removal.(CVE-2026-52930)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ni2c: dev: prevent integer overflow in I2C_TIMEOUT ioctl\n\nWhile fuzzing with Syzkaller, a persistent `schedule_timeout: wrong\ntimeout value` warning was observed, accompanied by SMBus controller\nstate machine corruption.\n\nThe I2C_TIMEOUT ioctl accepts a user-provided timeout in multiples of\n10 ms. The user argument is checked against INT_MAX, but it is\nsubsequently multiplied by 10 before being passed to msecs_to_jiffies().\n\nA malicious user can pass a large value (e.g., 429496729) that passes\nthe `arg \u0026gt; INT_MAX` check but overflows when multiplied by 10. This\nresults in a truncated 32-bit unsigned value that bypasses the\ninternal `(int)m \u0026lt; 0` check in `msecs_to_jiffies()`.\n\nThe truncated value is then assigned to `client-\u0026gt;adapter-\u0026gt;timeout`\n(a signed 32-bit int), which is reinterpreted as a negative number.\nWhen passed to wait_for_completion_timeout(), this negative value\nundergoes sign extension to a 64-bit unsigned long, triggering the\n`schedule_timeout` warning and causing premature returns. This leaves\nthe SMBus state machine in an unrecoverable state, constituting a\nlocal Denial of Service (DoS).\n\nFix this by bounding the user argument to `INT_MAX / 10`.\n\n[wsa: move the comment as well](CVE-2026-52948)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\niommu/vt-d: Fix oops due to out of scope access\n\nBelow oops triggers when kill QEMU process:\n\n Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x7fffffff844eaaa7: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n do_raw_spin_lock+0xaa/0xc0\n _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x21/0x40\n domain_remove_dev_pasid+0x52/0x160\n intel_nested_set_dev_pasid+0x1b9/0x1e0\n __iommu_set_group_pasid+0x56/0x120\n pci_dev_reset_iommu_done+0xe3/0x180\n pcie_flr+0x65/0x160\n __pci_reset_function_locked+0x5b/0x120\n vfio_pci_core_close_device+0x63/0xe0 [vfio_pci_core]\n vfio_df_close+0x4f/0xa0\n vfio_df_unbind_iommufd+0x2d/0x60\n vfio_device_fops_release+0x3e/0x40\n __fput+0xe5/0x2c0\n task_work_run+0x58/0xa0\n do_exit+0x2c8/0x600\n do_group_exit+0x2f/0xa0\n get_signal+0x863/0x8c0\n arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x24/0x100\n exit_to_user_mode_loop+0x87/0x380\n do_syscall_64+0x2ff/0x11e0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e\n\nThe global static blocked domain is a dummy domain without corresponding\ndmar_domain structure, accessing beyond iommu_domain structure triggers\noops easily. Fix it by return early in domain_remove_dev_pasid() like\nidentity domain.(CVE-2026-52953)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nceph: fix BUG_ON in __ceph_build_xattrs_blob() due to stale blob size\n\nThe generic/642 test-case can reproduce the kernel crash:\n\n[40243.605254] ------------[ cut here ]------------\n[40243.605956] kernel BUG at fs/ceph/xattr.c:918!\n[40243.607142] Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI\n[40243.608067] CPU: 7 UID: 0 PID: 498762 Comm: kworker/7:1 Not tainted 7.0.0-rc7+ #3 PREEMPT(full)\n[40243.609700] Hardware name: QEMU Ubuntu 25.10 PC v2 (i440FX + PIIX, + 10.1 machine, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014\n[40243.611820] Workqueue: ceph-msgr ceph_con_workfn\n[40243.612715] RIP: 0010:__ceph_build_xattrs_blob+0x1b8/0x1e0\n[40243.613731] Code: 0f 84 82 fe ff ff e9 cf 8e 56 ff 48 8d 65 e8 31 c0 5b 41 5c 41 5d 5d 31 d2 31 c9 31 f6 31 ff 45 31 c0 45 31 c9 c3 cc cc cc cc \u0026lt;0f\u0026gt; 0b 4c 8b 62 08 41 8b 85 24 07 00 00 49 83 c4 04 41 89 44 24 fc\n[40243.616888] RSP: 0018:ffffcc80c4d4b688 EFLAGS: 00010287\n[40243.617773] RAX: 0000000000010026 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 0000000000000000\n[40243.618928] RDX: ffff8a773798dee0 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000\n[40243.620158] RBP: ffffcc80c4d4b6a0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000\n[40243.621573] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8a75f3b58000\n[40243.622907] R13: ffff8a75f3b58000 R14: 0000000000000080 R15: 000000000000bffd\n[40243.624054] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8a787d1b4000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n[40243.625331] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n[40243.626269] CR2: 000072f390b623c0 CR3: 000000011c02a003 CR4: 0000000000372ef0\n[40243.627408] Call Trace:\n[40243.627839] \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n[40243.628188] __prep_cap+0x3fd/0x4a0\n[40243.628789] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4e/0xe0\n[40243.629474] ceph_check_caps+0x46a/0xc80\n[40243.630094] ? __lock_acquire+0x4a2/0x2650\n[40243.630773] ? find_held_lock+0x31/0x90\n[40243.631347] ? handle_cap_grant+0x79f/0x1060\n[40243.632068] ? lock_release+0xd9/0x300\n[40243.632696] ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x3e/0x340\n[40243.633429] ? lock_release+0xd9/0x300\n[40243.634052] handle_cap_grant+0xcf6/0x1060\n[40243.634745] ceph_handle_caps+0x122b/0x2110\n[40243.635415] mds_dispatch+0x5bd/0x2160\n[40243.636034] ? ceph_con_process_message+0x65/0x190\n[40243.636828] ? lock_release+0xd9/0x300\n[40243.637431] ceph_con_process_message+0x7a/0x190\n[40243.638184] ? kfree+0x311/0x4f0\n[40243.638749] ? kfree+0x311/0x4f0\n[40243.639268] process_message+0x16/0x1a0\n[40243.639915] ? sg_free_table+0x39/0x90\n[40243.640572] ceph_con_v2_try_read+0xf58/0x2120\n[40243.641255] ? lock_acquire+0xc8/0x300\n[40243.641863] ceph_con_workfn+0x151/0x820\n[40243.642493] process_one_work+0x22f/0x630\n[40243.643093] ? process_one_work+0x254/0x630\n[40243.643770] worker_thread+0x1e2/0x400\n[40243.644332] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10\n[40243.645020] kthread+0x109/0x140\n[40243.645560] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10\n[40243.646125] ret_from_fork+0x3f8/0x480\n[40243.646752] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10\n[40243.647316] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10\n[40243.647919] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30\n[40243.648556] \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\n[40243.648902] Modules linked in: overlay hctr2 libpolyval chacha libchacha adiantum libnh libpoly1305 essiv intel_rapl_msr intel_rapl_common intel_uncore_frequency_common skx_edac_common nfit kvm_intel kvm irqbypass joydev ghash_clmulni_intel aesni_intel rapl input_leds mac_hid psmouse vga16fb serio_raw vgastate floppy i2c_piix4 pata_acpi bochs qemu_fw_cfg i2c_smbus sch_fq_codel rbd dm_crypt msr parport_pc ppdev lp parport efi_pstore\n[40243.654766] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---\n\nCommit d93231a6bc8a (\u0026quot;ceph: prevent a client from exceeding the MDS\nmaximum xattr size\u0026quot;) moved the required_blob_size computation to before\nthe __build_xattrs() call, introducing a race.\n\n__build_xattrs() releases and reacquires i_ceph_lock during execution.\nIn that window, handle_cap_grant() may update i_xattrs.blob with a\nnewer MDS-provided blob and bump i_xattrs.version. When\n__bui\n---truncated---(CVE-2026-52961)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nfsnotify: fix inode reference leak in fsnotify_recalc_mask()\n\nfsnotify_recalc_mask() fails to handle the return value of\n__fsnotify_recalc_mask(), which may return an inode pointer that needs\nto be released via fsnotify_drop_object() when the connector\u0026apos;s HAS_IREF\nflag transitions from set to cleared.\n\nThis manifests as a hung task with the following call trace:\n\n INFO: task umount:1234 blocked for more than 120 seconds.\n Call Trace:\n __schedule\n schedule\n fsnotify_sb_delete\n generic_shutdown_super\n kill_anon_super\n cleanup_mnt\n task_work_run\n do_exit\n do_group_exit\n\nThe race window that triggers the iref leak:\n\n Thread A (adding mark) Thread B (removing mark)\n \u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500 \u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\n fsnotify_add_mark_locked():\n fsnotify_add_mark_list():\n spin_lock(conn-\u0026gt;lock)\n add mark_B(evictable) to list\n spin_unlock(conn-\u0026gt;lock)\n return\n\n /* ---- gap: no lock held ---- */\n\n fsnotify_detach_mark(mark_A):\n spin_lock(mark_A-\u0026gt;lock)\n clear ATTACHED flag on mark_A\n spin_unlock(mark_A-\u0026gt;lock)\n fsnotify_put_mark(mark_A)\n\n fsnotify_recalc_mask():\n spin_lock(conn-\u0026gt;lock)\n __fsnotify_recalc_mask():\n /* mark_A skipped: ATTACHED cleared */\n /* only mark_B(evictable) remains */\n want_iref = false\n has_iref = true /* not yet cleared */\n -\u0026gt; HAS_IREF transitions true -\u0026gt; false\n -\u0026gt; returns inode pointer\n spin_unlock(conn-\u0026gt;lock)\n /* BUG: return value discarded!\n * iput() and fsnotify_put_sb_watched_objects()\n * are never called */\n\nFix this by deferring the transition true -\u0026gt; false of HAS_IREF flag from\nfsnotify_recalc_mask() (Thread A) to fsnotify_put_mark() (thread B).(CVE-2026-52990)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nerofs: unify lcn as u64 for 32-bit platforms\n\nAs sashiko reported [1], `lcn` was typed as `unsigned long` (or\n`unsigned int` sometimes), which is only 32 bits wide on 32-bit\nplatforms, which causes `(lcn \u0026lt;\u0026lt; lclusterbits)` to be truncated\nat 4 GiB.\n\nIn order to consolidate the logic, just use `u64` consistently\naround the codebase.\n\n[1] https://sashiko.dev/r/20260420034612.1899973-1-hsiangkao%40linux.alibaba.com(CVE-2026-53015)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\niommu/amd: Fix clone_alias() to use the original device\u0026apos;s devid\n\nCurrently clone_alias() assumes first argument (pdev) is always the\noriginal device pointer. This function is called by\npci_for_each_dma_alias() which based on topology decides to send\noriginal or alias device details in first argument.\n\nThis meant that the source devid used to look up and copy the DTE\nmay be incorrect, leading to wrong or stale DTE entries being\npropagated to alias device.\n\nFix this by passing the original pdev as the opaque data argument to\nboth the direct clone_alias() call and pci_for_each_dma_alias(). Inside\nclone_alias(), retrieve the original device from data and compute devid\nfrom it.(CVE-2026-53053)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nUSB: serial: kl5kusb105: fix bulk-out buffer overflow\n\nklsi_105_prepare_write_buffer() is called by the generic write path\nwith the bulk-out buffer and its size (bulk_out_size, 64 bytes). It\nstores a two-byte length header at the start of the buffer and copies\nthe payload from the write fifo starting at buf + KLSI_HDR_LEN, but\npasses the full buffer size as the number of bytes to copy:\n\n count = kfifo_out_locked(\u0026amp;port-\u0026gt;write_fifo, buf + KLSI_HDR_LEN,\n size, \u0026amp;port-\u0026gt;lock);\n\nWhen the fifo holds at least size bytes, size bytes are copied starting\ntwo bytes into the size-byte buffer, writing KLSI_HDR_LEN bytes past its\nend. Copy at most size - KLSI_HDR_LEN bytes instead, leaving room for\nthe header as safe_serial already does.\n\nWriting bulk_out_size or more bytes to the tty triggers a slab\nout-of-bounds write, observed with KASAN by emulating the device with\ndummy_hcd and raw-gadget:\n\n BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in kfifo_copy_out+0x83/0xc0\n Write of size 64 at addr ffff888112c62202 by task python3\n kfifo_copy_out\n klsi_105_prepare_write_buffer [kl5kusb105]\n usb_serial_generic_write_start [usbserial]\n Allocated by task 139:\n usb_serial_probe [usbserial]\n The buggy address is located 2 bytes inside of allocated 64-byte region\n\nThe out-of-bounds write no longer occurs with this change applied.(CVE-2026-53194)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nUSB: serial: io_ti: fix heap overflow in get_manuf_info()\n\nget_manuf_info() reads le16_to_cpu(rom_desc-\u0026gt;Size) bytes from the\ndevice I2C EEPROM into a buffer allocated with kmalloc_obj(), which\nis sizeof(struct edge_ti_manuf_descriptor) = 10 bytes.\n\nThe Size field comes from the device and is only validated (in\ncheck_i2c_image()) to make sure the descriptor fits within\nTI_MAX_I2C_SIZE (16384 bytes), not against the destination buffer size.\nA malicious USB device can therefore set Size to any value up to 16377,\ncausing a heap overflow of up to 16367 bytes when plugged into a host\nrunning this driver.\n\nvalid_csum() is called after read_rom() and also iterates\nbuffer[0..Size-1], compounding the out-of-bounds access.\n\nFix by rejecting descriptors with unexpected length before calling\nread_rom().\n\n[ johan: amend commit message; also check for short descriptors ](CVE-2026-53196)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nl2tp: pppol2tp: hold reference to session in pppol2tp_ioctl()\n\npppol2tp_ioctl() read sock-\u0026gt;sk-\u0026gt;sk_user_data directly without any\nlocks or reference counting. If a controllable sleep was induced during\ncopy_from_user() (e.g. via a userfaultfd page fault sleep), a concurrent\nsocket close could trigger pppol2tp_session_close() asynchronously. This\nfrees the l2tp_session structure via the l2tp_session_del_work workqueue.\nUpon resuming, the ioctl thread dereferences the stale session pointer,\nresulting in a Use-After-Free (UAF).\n\nFix this by securely fetching the session reference using the RCU-safe,\nrefcounted helper pppol2tp_sock_to_session(sk) on entry. This locks the\nsession\u0026apos;s refcount across the sleep. We structured the function to exit\nvia standard err breaks, guaranteeing that l2tp_session_put() is cleanly\ncalled on all return paths to drop the reference.\n\nTo preserve existing behavior we validate the session and its magic\nsignature only for the specific L2TP commands that require it. This\nensures that generic/unknown ioctls called on an unconnected socket\nstill return -ENOIOCTLCMD and correctly fall back to generic handlers\n(e.g. in sock_do_ioctl()).(CVE-2026-53262)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndrm/amd/display: Wrap DCN32 phantom-plane allocation in DC_RUN_WITH_PREEMPTION_ENABLED\n\n[Why]\ndcn32_validate_bandwidth() wraps dcn32_internal_validate_bw() with\nDC_FP_START()/DC_FP_END(). In x86 non-RT, DC_FP_START takes fpregs_lock(),\nwhich disables local softirqs.\n\nThe DML1 path through dcn32_enable_phantom_plane() calls kvzalloc() to\nallocate ~335 KiB for dc_plane_state. This triggers the vmalloc path,\nwhich calls BUG_ON(in_interrupt()) because it\u0026apos;s invoked within the\nFPU-enabled (softirq disabled) region, leading to a kernel crash.\n\n[How]\nWrap the dc_state_create_phantom_plane() call with the\nDC_RUN_WITH_PREEMPTION_ENABLED() macro to allow preemption during\nthis memory allocation.\n\n(cherry picked from commit 885ccbef7b94a8b38f69c4211c679021aa27ad11)(CVE-2026-53285)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndrm/amd/display: Avoid NULL dereference in dc_dmub_srv error paths\n\nIn dc_dmub_srv_log_diagnostic_data() and\ndc_dmub_srv_enable_dpia_trace().\n\nBoth functions check:\n\n if (!dc_dmub_srv || !dc_dmub_srv-\u0026gt;dmub)\n\nand then call DC_LOG_ERROR() inside that block.\n\nDC_LOG_ERROR() uses dc_dmub_srv-\u0026gt;ctx internally. So if\ndc_dmub_srv is NULL, the logging itself can dereference a\nNULL pointer and cause a crash.\n\nFix this by splitting the checks.\n\nFirst check if dc_dmub_srv is NULL and return immediately.\nThen check dc_dmub_srv-\u0026gt;dmub and log the error only when\ndc_dmub_srv is valid.\n\nFixes the below:\n../display/dc/dc_dmub_srv.c:962 dc_dmub_srv_log_diagnostic_data() error: we previously assumed \u0026apos;dc_dmub_srv\u0026apos; could be null (see line 961)\n../display/dc/dc_dmub_srv.c:1167 dc_dmub_srv_enable_dpia_trace() error: we previously assumed \u0026apos;dc_dmub_srv\u0026apos; could be null (see line 1166)(CVE-2026-53313)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\npadata: Put CPU offline callback in ONLINE section to allow failure\n\nsyzbot reported the following warning:\n\n DEAD callback error for CPU1\n WARNING: kernel/cpu.c:1463 at _cpu_down+0x759/0x1020 kernel/cpu.c:1463, CPU#0: syz.0.1960/14614\n\nat commit 4ae12d8bd9a8 (\u0026quot;Merge tag \u0026apos;kbuild-fixes-7.0-2\u0026apos; of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kbuild/linux\u0026quot;)\nwhich tglx traced to padata_cpu_dead() given it\u0026apos;s the only\nsub-CPUHP_TEARDOWN_CPU callback that returns an error.\n\nFailure isn\u0026apos;t allowed in hotplug states before CPUHP_TEARDOWN_CPU\nso move the CPU offline callback to the ONLINE section where failure is\npossible.(CVE-2026-53314)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndrm/virtio: Fix driver removal with disabled KMS\n\nDRM atomic and modesetting aren\u0026apos;t initialized if virtio-gpu driver built\nwith disabled KMS, leading to access of uninitialized data on driver\nremoval/unbinding and crashing kernel. Fix it by skipping shutting down\natomic core with unavailable KMS.(CVE-2026-53347)",
"id": "OESA-2026-3454",
"modified": "2026-08-20T09:59:30Z",
"published": "2026-08-20T09:59:30Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2026-3454"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43153"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43331"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-45893"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-46135"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-46324"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-52908"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-52918"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-52923"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-52930"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-52948"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-52953"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-52961"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-52990"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53015"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53053"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53194"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53196"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53262"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53285"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53313"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53314"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53347"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2026-43153",
"CVE-2026-43331",
"CVE-2026-45893",
"CVE-2026-46135",
"CVE-2026-46324",
"CVE-2026-52908",
"CVE-2026-52918",
"CVE-2026-52923",
"CVE-2026-52930",
"CVE-2026-52948",
"CVE-2026-52953",
"CVE-2026-52961",
"CVE-2026-52990",
"CVE-2026-53015",
"CVE-2026-53053",
"CVE-2026-53194",
"CVE-2026-53196",
"CVE-2026-53262",
"CVE-2026-53285",
"CVE-2026-53313",
"CVE-2026-53314",
"CVE-2026-53347"
]
}
OESA-2026-3455 (CVE-2026-43153)
Vulnerability from osv_openeuler – Published: 2026-08-20 09:59 – Updated: 2026-08-20 09:59 – Source websiteThe Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.
Security Fix(es):
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
xfs: remove xfs_attr_leaf_hasname
The calling convention of xfs_attr_leaf_hasname() is problematic, because it returns a NULL buffer when xfs_attr3_leaf_read fails, a valid buffer when xfs_attr3_leaf_lookup_int returns -ENOATTR or -EEXIST, and a non-NULL buffer pointer for an already released buffer when xfs_attr3_leaf_lookup_int fails with other error values.
Fix this by simply open coding xfs_attr_leaf_hasname in the callers, so that the buffer release code is done by each caller of xfs_attr3_leaf_read.(CVE-2026-43153)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
x86/kexec: Disable KCOV instrumentation after load_segments()
The load_segments() function changes segment registers, invalidating GS base (which KCOV relies on for per-cpu data). When CONFIG_KCOV is enabled, any subsequent instrumented C code call (e.g. native_gdt_invalidate()) begins crashing the kernel in an endless loop.
To reproduce the problem, it's sufficient to do kexec on a KCOV-instrumented kernel:
$ kexec -l /boot/otherKernel $ kexec -e
The real-world context for this problem is enabling crash dump collection in syzkaller. For this, the tool loads a panic kernel before fuzzing and then calls makedumpfile after the panic. This workflow requires both CONFIG_KEXEC and CONFIG_KCOV to be enabled simultaneously.
Adding safeguards directly to the KCOV fast-path (__sanitizer_cov_trace_pc()) is also undesirable as it would introduce an extra performance overhead.
Disabling instrumentation for the individual functions would be too fragile, so disable KCOV instrumentation for the entire machine_kexec_64.c and physaddr.c. If coverage-guided fuzzing ever needs these components in the future, other approaches should be considered.
The problem is not relevant for 32 bit kernels as CONFIG_KCOV is not supported there.
bp: Space out comment for better readability.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nvmet-tcp: fix race between ICReq handling and queue teardown
nvmet_tcp_handle_icreq() updates queue->state after sending an Initialization Connection Response (ICResp), but it does so without serializing against target-side queue teardown.
If an NVMe/TCP host sends an Initialization Connection Request (ICReq) and immediately closes the connection, target-side teardown may start in softirq context before io_work drains the already buffered ICReq. In that case, nvmet_tcp_schedule_release_queue() sets queue->state to NVMET_TCP_Q_DISCONNECTING and drops the queue reference under state_lock.
If io_work later processes that ICReq, nvmet_tcp_handle_icreq() can still overwrite the state back to NVMET_TCP_Q_LIVE. That defeats the DISCONNECTING-state guard in nvmet_tcp_schedule_release_queue() and allows a later socket state change to re-enter teardown and issue a second kref_put() on an already released queue.
The ICResp send failure path has the same problem. If teardown has already moved the queue to DISCONNECTING, a send error can still overwrite the state with NVMET_TCP_Q_FAILED, again reopening the window for a second teardown path to drop the queue reference.
Fix this by serializing both post-send state transitions with state_lock and bailing out if teardown has already started.
Use -ESHUTDOWN as an internal sentinel for that bail-out path rather than propagating it as a transport error like -ECONNRESET. Keep nvmet_tcp_socket_error() setting rcv_state to NVMET_TCP_RECV_ERR before honoring that sentinel so receive-side parsing stays quiesced until the existing release path completes.(CVE-2026-46135)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: nf_tables: use list_del_rcu for netlink hooks
nft_netdev_unregister_hooks and __nft_unregister_flowtable_net_hooks need to use list_del_rcu(), this list can be walked by concurrent dumpers.
Add a new helper and use it consistently.(CVE-2026-46324)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
RDMA: During rereg_mr ensure that REREG_ACCESS is compatible
If IB_MR_REREG_ACCESS changes from RO to RW then the umem has to be re-evaluated to ensure it is properly pinned as RW. Since the umem is hidden inside each driver's mr struct add a ib_umem_check_rereg() function that each driver has to call before processing IB_MR_REREG_ACCESS.
mlx4 has to retain its duplicate ib_access_writable check because it implements IB_MR_REREG_ACCESS | IB_MR_REREG_TRANS by changing both items in place sequentially while the MR is live, so it will continue to not support this combination.(CVE-2026-52908)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: serialize accept_q access
bt_sock_poll() walks the accept queue without synchronization, while child teardown can unlink the same socket and drop its last reference. The unsynchronized accept queue walk has existed since the initial Bluetooth import.
Protect accept_q with a dedicated lock for queue updates and polling. Also rework bt_accept_dequeue() to take temporary child references under the queue lock before dropping it and locking the child socket.(CVE-2026-52918)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipc: limit next_id allocation to the valid ID range
The checkpoint/restore sysctl path can request the next SysV IPC id through ids->next_id. ipc_idr_alloc() currently forwards that request to idr_alloc() with an open-ended upper bound.
If the valid tail of the SysV IPC id space is full, the allocation can spill beyond ipc_mni. The returned SysV IPC id still uses the normal index encoding, so later lookup and removal can target the wrong slot. This leaves the real IDR entry behind and breaks the IDR state for the object.
The bug is in ipc_idr_alloc() in the checkpoint/restore path.
-
ids->next_id is passed to:
idr_alloc(&ids->ipcs_idr, new, ipcid_to_idx(next_id), 0, ...)
-
The zero upper bound makes the allocation effectively open-ended. Once the valid SysV IPC tail is occupied, idr_alloc() can spill past ipc_mni and allocate an entry beyond the valid IPC id range.
-
The new object id is still encoded with the narrower SysV IPC index width:
new->id = (new->seq << ipcmni_seq_shift()) + idx
-
Later removal goes through ipc_rmid(), which uses:
ipcid_to_idx(ipcp->id)
That truncates the real IDR index. An object actually stored at a high index can then be removed as if it lived at a low in-range index.
-
For shared memory, shm_destroy() frees the current object anyway, but the real high IDR slot is left behind as a dangling pointer.
-
A subsequent walk of /proc/sysvipc/shm reaches the stale IDR entry and dereferences freed memory.
Prevent this by bounding the requested allocation to ipc_mni so the checkpoint/restore path fails once the valid range is exhausted.(CVE-2026-52923)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipc/shm: serialize orphan cleanup with shm_nattch updates
shm_destroy_orphaned() walks the shm idr under shm_ids(ns).rwsem, but that does not serialize all fields tested by shm_may_destroy(). In particular, shm_nattch is updated while holding shm_perm.lock, and attach paths can do that without holding the rwsem.
Do not decide that an orphaned segment is unused before taking the object lock. Move the shm_may_destroy() check under shm_perm.lock, matching the other destroy paths, and unlock the segment when it no longer qualifies for removal.(CVE-2026-52930)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
i2c: dev: prevent integer overflow in I2C_TIMEOUT ioctl
While fuzzing with Syzkaller, a persistent schedule_timeout: wrong
timeout value warning was observed, accompanied by SMBus controller
state machine corruption.
The I2C_TIMEOUT ioctl accepts a user-provided timeout in multiples of 10 ms. The user argument is checked against INT_MAX, but it is subsequently multiplied by 10 before being passed to msecs_to_jiffies().
A malicious user can pass a large value (e.g., 429496729) that passes
the arg > INT_MAX check but overflows when multiplied by 10. This
results in a truncated 32-bit unsigned value that bypasses the
internal (int)m < 0 check in msecs_to_jiffies().
The truncated value is then assigned to client->adapter->timeout
(a signed 32-bit int), which is reinterpreted as a negative number.
When passed to wait_for_completion_timeout(), this negative value
undergoes sign extension to a 64-bit unsigned long, triggering the
schedule_timeout warning and causing premature returns. This leaves
the SMBus state machine in an unrecoverable state, constituting a
local Denial of Service (DoS).
Fix this by bounding the user argument to INT_MAX / 10.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
iommu/vt-d: Fix oops due to out of scope access
Below oops triggers when kill QEMU process:
Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x7fffffff844eaaa7: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI Call Trace: <TASK> do_raw_spin_lock+0xaa/0xc0 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x21/0x40 domain_remove_dev_pasid+0x52/0x160 intel_nested_set_dev_pasid+0x1b9/0x1e0 __iommu_set_group_pasid+0x56/0x120 pci_dev_reset_iommu_done+0xe3/0x180 pcie_flr+0x65/0x160 __pci_reset_function_locked+0x5b/0x120 vfio_pci_core_close_device+0x63/0xe0 [vfio_pci_core] vfio_df_close+0x4f/0xa0 vfio_df_unbind_iommufd+0x2d/0x60 vfio_device_fops_release+0x3e/0x40 __fput+0xe5/0x2c0 task_work_run+0x58/0xa0 do_exit+0x2c8/0x600 do_group_exit+0x2f/0xa0 get_signal+0x863/0x8c0 arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x24/0x100 exit_to_user_mode_loop+0x87/0x380 do_syscall_64+0x2ff/0x11e0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
The global static blocked domain is a dummy domain without corresponding dmar_domain structure, accessing beyond iommu_domain structure triggers oops easily. Fix it by return early in domain_remove_dev_pasid() like identity domain.(CVE-2026-52953)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ceph: fix BUG_ON in __ceph_build_xattrs_blob() due to stale blob size
The generic/642 test-case can reproduce the kernel crash:
[40243.605254] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [40243.605956] kernel BUG at fs/ceph/xattr.c:918! [40243.607142] Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI [40243.608067] CPU: 7 UID: 0 PID: 498762 Comm: kworker/7:1 Not tainted 7.0.0-rc7+ #3 PREEMPT(full) [40243.609700] Hardware name: QEMU Ubuntu 25.10 PC v2 (i440FX + PIIX, + 10.1 machine, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014 [40243.611820] Workqueue: ceph-msgr ceph_con_workfn [40243.612715] RIP: 0010:__ceph_build_xattrs_blob+0x1b8/0x1e0 [40243.613731] Code: 0f 84 82 fe ff ff e9 cf 8e 56 ff 48 8d 65 e8 31 c0 5b 41 5c 41 5d 5d 31 d2 31 c9 31 f6 31 ff 45 31 c0 45 31 c9 c3 cc cc cc cc <0f> 0b 4c 8b 62 08 41 8b 85 24 07 00 00 49 83 c4 04 41 89 44 24 fc [40243.616888] RSP: 0018:ffffcc80c4d4b688 EFLAGS: 00010287 [40243.617773] RAX: 0000000000010026 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 0000000000000000 [40243.618928] RDX: ffff8a773798dee0 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 [40243.620158] RBP: ffffcc80c4d4b6a0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [40243.621573] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8a75f3b58000 [40243.622907] R13: ffff8a75f3b58000 R14: 0000000000000080 R15: 000000000000bffd [40243.624054] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8a787d1b4000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [40243.625331] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [40243.626269] CR2: 000072f390b623c0 CR3: 000000011c02a003 CR4: 0000000000372ef0 [40243.627408] Call Trace: [40243.627839] <TASK> [40243.628188] __prep_cap+0x3fd/0x4a0 [40243.628789] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4e/0xe0 [40243.629474] ceph_check_caps+0x46a/0xc80 [40243.630094] ? __lock_acquire+0x4a2/0x2650 [40243.630773] ? find_held_lock+0x31/0x90 [40243.631347] ? handle_cap_grant+0x79f/0x1060 [40243.632068] ? lock_release+0xd9/0x300 [40243.632696] ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x3e/0x340 [40243.633429] ? lock_release+0xd9/0x300 [40243.634052] handle_cap_grant+0xcf6/0x1060 [40243.634745] ceph_handle_caps+0x122b/0x2110 [40243.635415] mds_dispatch+0x5bd/0x2160 [40243.636034] ? ceph_con_process_message+0x65/0x190 [40243.636828] ? lock_release+0xd9/0x300 [40243.637431] ceph_con_process_message+0x7a/0x190 [40243.638184] ? kfree+0x311/0x4f0 [40243.638749] ? kfree+0x311/0x4f0 [40243.639268] process_message+0x16/0x1a0 [40243.639915] ? sg_free_table+0x39/0x90 [40243.640572] ceph_con_v2_try_read+0xf58/0x2120 [40243.641255] ? lock_acquire+0xc8/0x300 [40243.641863] ceph_con_workfn+0x151/0x820 [40243.642493] process_one_work+0x22f/0x630 [40243.643093] ? process_one_work+0x254/0x630 [40243.643770] worker_thread+0x1e2/0x400 [40243.644332] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 [40243.645020] kthread+0x109/0x140 [40243.645560] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [40243.646125] ret_from_fork+0x3f8/0x480 [40243.646752] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [40243.647316] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [40243.647919] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [40243.648556] </TASK> [40243.648902] Modules linked in: overlay hctr2 libpolyval chacha libchacha adiantum libnh libpoly1305 essiv intel_rapl_msr intel_rapl_common intel_uncore_frequency_common skx_edac_common nfit kvm_intel kvm irqbypass joydev ghash_clmulni_intel aesni_intel rapl input_leds mac_hid psmouse vga16fb serio_raw vgastate floppy i2c_piix4 pata_acpi bochs qemu_fw_cfg i2c_smbus sch_fq_codel rbd dm_crypt msr parport_pc ppdev lp parport efi_pstore [40243.654766] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
Commit d93231a6bc8a ("ceph: prevent a client from exceeding the MDS maximum xattr size") moved the required_blob_size computation to before the __build_xattrs() call, introducing a race.
__build_xattrs() releases and reacquires i_ceph_lock during execution. In that window, handle_cap_grant() may update i_xattrs.blob with a newer MDS-provided blob and bump i_xattrs.version. When __bui ---truncated---(CVE-2026-52961)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
fsnotify: fix inode reference leak in fsnotify_recalc_mask()
fsnotify_recalc_mask() fails to handle the return value of __fsnotify_recalc_mask(), which may return an inode pointer that needs to be released via fsnotify_drop_object() when the connector's HAS_IREF flag transitions from set to cleared.
This manifests as a hung task with the following call trace:
INFO: task umount:1234 blocked for more than 120 seconds. Call Trace: __schedule schedule fsnotify_sb_delete generic_shutdown_super kill_anon_super cleanup_mnt task_work_run do_exit do_group_exit
The race window that triggers the iref leak:
Thread A (adding mark) Thread B (removing mark) ────────────────────── ──────────────────────── fsnotify_add_mark_locked(): fsnotify_add_mark_list(): spin_lock(conn->lock) add mark_B(evictable) to list spin_unlock(conn->lock) return
/* ---- gap: no lock held ---- */
fsnotify_detach_mark(mark_A):
spin_lock(mark_A->lock)
clear ATTACHED flag on mark_A
spin_unlock(mark_A->lock)
fsnotify_put_mark(mark_A)
fsnotify_recalc_mask():
spin_lock(conn->lock)
__fsnotify_recalc_mask():
/* mark_A skipped: ATTACHED cleared */
/* only mark_B(evictable) remains */
want_iref = false
has_iref = true /* not yet cleared */
-> HAS_IREF transitions true -> false
-> returns inode pointer
spin_unlock(conn->lock)
/* BUG: return value discarded!
* iput() and fsnotify_put_sb_watched_objects()
* are never called */
Fix this by deferring the transition true -> false of HAS_IREF flag from fsnotify_recalc_mask() (Thread A) to fsnotify_put_mark() (thread B).(CVE-2026-52990)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
sched/psi: fix race between file release and pressure write
A potential race condition exists between pressure write and cgroup file release regarding the priv member of struct kernfs_open_file, which triggers the uaf reported in [1].
Consider the following scenario involving execution on two separate CPUs:
CPU0 CPU1 ==== ==== vfs_rmdir() kernfs_iop_rmdir() cgroup_rmdir() cgroup_kn_lock_live() cgroup_destroy_locked() cgroup_addrm_files() cgroup_rm_file() kernfs_remove_by_name() kernfs_remove_by_name_ns() vfs_write() __kernfs_remove() new_sync_write() kernfs_drain() kernfs_fop_write_iter() kernfs_drain_open_files() cgroup_file_write() kernfs_release_file() pressure_write() cgroup_file_release() ctx = of->priv; kfree(ctx); of->priv = NULL; cgroup_kn_unlock() cgroup_kn_lock_live() cgroup_get(cgrp) cgroup_kn_unlock() if (ctx->psi.trigger) // here, trigger uaf for ctx, that is of->priv
The cgroup_rmdir() is protected by the cgroup_mutex, it also safeguards the memory deallocation of of->priv performed within cgroup_file_release(). However, the operations involving of->priv executed within pressure_write() are not entirely covered by the protection of cgroup_mutex. Consequently, if the code in pressure_write(), specifically the section handling the ctx variable executes after cgroup_file_release() has completed, a uaf vulnerability involving of->priv is triggered.
Therefore, the issue can be resolved by extending the scope of the cgroup_mutex lock within pressure_write() to encompass all code paths involving of->priv, thereby properly synchronizing the race condition occurring between cgroup_file_release() and pressure_write().
And, if an live kn lock can be successfully acquired while executing the pressure write operation, it indicates that the cgroup deletion process has not yet reached its final stage; consequently, the priv pointer within open_file cannot be NULL. Therefore, the operation to retrieve the ctx value must be moved to a point after the live kn lock has been successfully acquired.
In another situation, specifically after entering cgroup_kn_lock_live() but before acquiring cgroup_mutex, there exists a different class of race condition:
CPU0: write memory.pressure CPU1: write cgroup.pressure=0 =========================== =============================
kernfs_fop_write_iter() kernfs_get_active_of(of) pressure_write() cgroup_kn_lock_live(memory.pressure) cgroup_tryget(cgrp) kernfs_break_active_protection(kn) ... blocks on cgroup_mutex
cgroup_pressure_write()
cgroup_kn_lock_live(cgroup.pressure)
cgroup_file_show(memory.pressure, false)
kernfs_show(false)
kernfs_drain_open_files()
cgroup_file_release(of)
kfree(ctx)
of->priv = NULL
cgroup_kn_unlock()
... acquires cgroup_mutex ctx = of->priv; // may now be NULL if (ctx->psi.trigger) // NULL dereference
Consequently, there is a possibility that of->priv is NULL, the pressure write needs to check for this.
Now that the scope of the cgroup_mutex has been expanded, the original explicit cgroup_get/put operations are no longer necessary, this is because acquiring/releasing the live kn lock inherently executes a cgroup get/put operation.
[1] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in pressure_write+0xa4/0x210 kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:4011 Call Trace: pressure_write+0xa4/0x210 kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:4011 cgroup_file_write+0x36f/0x790 kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:43 ---truncated---(CVE-2026-52991)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
erofs: unify lcn as u64 for 32-bit platforms
As sashiko reported [1], lcn was typed as unsigned long (or
unsigned int sometimes), which is only 32 bits wide on 32-bit
platforms, which causes (lcn << lclusterbits) to be truncated
at 4 GiB.
In order to consolidate the logic, just use u64 consistently
around the codebase.
[1] https://sashiko.dev/r/20260420034612.1899973-1-hsiangkao%40linux.alibaba.com(CVE-2026-53015)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
iommu/amd: Fix clone_alias() to use the original device's devid
Currently clone_alias() assumes first argument (pdev) is always the original device pointer. This function is called by pci_for_each_dma_alias() which based on topology decides to send original or alias device details in first argument.
This meant that the source devid used to look up and copy the DTE may be incorrect, leading to wrong or stale DTE entries being propagated to alias device.
Fix this by passing the original pdev as the opaque data argument to both the direct clone_alias() call and pci_for_each_dma_alias(). Inside clone_alias(), retrieve the original device from data and compute devid from it.(CVE-2026-53053)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
perf/amd/ibs: Avoid calling perf_allow_kernel() from the IBS NMI handler
Calling perf_allow_kernel() from the NMI context is unsafe and could be fatal. Capture the permission at event-initialization time by storing it in event->hw.flags, and have the NMI handler rely on that cached flag instead of making the call directly.(CVE-2026-53114)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
locking/rtmutex: Skip remove_waiter() when waiter is not enqueued
syzbot triggered the following splat in remove_waiter() via FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI:
KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000a88-0x0000000000000a8f] class_raw_spinlock_constructor remove_waiter+0x159/0x1200 kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:1561 rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock+0x103/0x120 futex_requeue+0x10e4/0x20d0 __x64_sys_futex+0x34f/0x4d0
task_blocks_on_rt_mutex() does not arm the waiter upon deadlock detection, leaving waiter->task nil, where 3bfdc63936dd ("rtmutex: Use waiter::task instead of current in remove_waiter()") made this fatal.
Furthermore, rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() should not be calling into remove_waiter() upon a successfully grabbing the rtmutex. 1a1fb985f2e2 ("futex: Handle early deadlock return correctly"), moved the remove_waiter() out of __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() (where 'ret' was only ever 0 or < 0) into the wrapper. Tighten this check to account for try_to_take_rt_mutex().(CVE-2026-53163)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
USB: serial: kl5kusb105: fix bulk-out buffer overflow
klsi_105_prepare_write_buffer() is called by the generic write path with the bulk-out buffer and its size (bulk_out_size, 64 bytes). It stores a two-byte length header at the start of the buffer and copies the payload from the write fifo starting at buf + KLSI_HDR_LEN, but passes the full buffer size as the number of bytes to copy:
count = kfifo_out_locked(&port->write_fifo, buf + KLSI_HDR_LEN, size, &port->lock);
When the fifo holds at least size bytes, size bytes are copied starting two bytes into the size-byte buffer, writing KLSI_HDR_LEN bytes past its end. Copy at most size - KLSI_HDR_LEN bytes instead, leaving room for the header as safe_serial already does.
Writing bulk_out_size or more bytes to the tty triggers a slab out-of-bounds write, observed with KASAN by emulating the device with dummy_hcd and raw-gadget:
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in kfifo_copy_out+0x83/0xc0 Write of size 64 at addr ffff888112c62202 by task python3 kfifo_copy_out klsi_105_prepare_write_buffer [kl5kusb105] usb_serial_generic_write_start [usbserial] Allocated by task 139: usb_serial_probe [usbserial] The buggy address is located 2 bytes inside of allocated 64-byte region
The out-of-bounds write no longer occurs with this change applied.(CVE-2026-53194)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
USB: serial: io_ti: fix heap overflow in get_manuf_info()
get_manuf_info() reads le16_to_cpu(rom_desc->Size) bytes from the device I2C EEPROM into a buffer allocated with kmalloc_obj(), which is sizeof(struct edge_ti_manuf_descriptor) = 10 bytes.
The Size field comes from the device and is only validated (in check_i2c_image()) to make sure the descriptor fits within TI_MAX_I2C_SIZE (16384 bytes), not against the destination buffer size. A malicious USB device can therefore set Size to any value up to 16377, causing a heap overflow of up to 16367 bytes when plugged into a host running this driver.
valid_csum() is called after read_rom() and also iterates buffer[0..Size-1], compounding the out-of-bounds access.
Fix by rejecting descriptors with unexpected length before calling read_rom().
johan: amend commit message; also check for short descriptors
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
l2tp: pppol2tp: hold reference to session in pppol2tp_ioctl()
pppol2tp_ioctl() read sock->sk->sk_user_data directly without any locks or reference counting. If a controllable sleep was induced during copy_from_user() (e.g. via a userfaultfd page fault sleep), a concurrent socket close could trigger pppol2tp_session_close() asynchronously. This frees the l2tp_session structure via the l2tp_session_del_work workqueue. Upon resuming, the ioctl thread dereferences the stale session pointer, resulting in a Use-After-Free (UAF).
Fix this by securely fetching the session reference using the RCU-safe, refcounted helper pppol2tp_sock_to_session(sk) on entry. This locks the session's refcount across the sleep. We structured the function to exit via standard err breaks, guaranteeing that l2tp_session_put() is cleanly called on all return paths to drop the reference.
To preserve existing behavior we validate the session and its magic signature only for the specific L2TP commands that require it. This ensures that generic/unknown ioctls called on an unconnected socket still return -ENOIOCTLCMD and correctly fall back to generic handlers (e.g. in sock_do_ioctl()).(CVE-2026-53262)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: Wrap DCN32 phantom-plane allocation in DC_RUN_WITH_PREEMPTION_ENABLED
[Why] dcn32_validate_bandwidth() wraps dcn32_internal_validate_bw() with DC_FP_START()/DC_FP_END(). In x86 non-RT, DC_FP_START takes fpregs_lock(), which disables local softirqs.
The DML1 path through dcn32_enable_phantom_plane() calls kvzalloc() to allocate ~335 KiB for dc_plane_state. This triggers the vmalloc path, which calls BUG_ON(in_interrupt()) because it's invoked within the FPU-enabled (softirq disabled) region, leading to a kernel crash.
[How] Wrap the dc_state_create_phantom_plane() call with the DC_RUN_WITH_PREEMPTION_ENABLED() macro to allow preemption during this memory allocation.
(cherry picked from commit 885ccbef7b94a8b38f69c4211c679021aa27ad11)(CVE-2026-53285)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: Avoid NULL dereference in dc_dmub_srv error paths
In dc_dmub_srv_log_diagnostic_data() and dc_dmub_srv_enable_dpia_trace().
Both functions check:
if (!dc_dmub_srv || !dc_dmub_srv->dmub)
and then call DC_LOG_ERROR() inside that block.
DC_LOG_ERROR() uses dc_dmub_srv->ctx internally. So if dc_dmub_srv is NULL, the logging itself can dereference a NULL pointer and cause a crash.
Fix this by splitting the checks.
First check if dc_dmub_srv is NULL and return immediately. Then check dc_dmub_srv->dmub and log the error only when dc_dmub_srv is valid.
Fixes the below: ../display/dc/dc_dmub_srv.c:962 dc_dmub_srv_log_diagnostic_data() error: we previously assumed 'dc_dmub_srv' could be null (see line 961) ../display/dc/dc_dmub_srv.c:1167 dc_dmub_srv_enable_dpia_trace() error: we previously assumed 'dc_dmub_srv' could be null (see line 1166)(CVE-2026-53313)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
padata: Put CPU offline callback in ONLINE section to allow failure
syzbot reported the following warning:
DEAD callback error for CPU1
WARNING: kernel/cpu.c:1463 at _cpu_down+0x759/0x1020 kernel/cpu.c:1463, CPU#0: syz.0.1960/14614
at commit 4ae12d8bd9a8 ("Merge tag 'kbuild-fixes-7.0-2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kbuild/linux") which tglx traced to padata_cpu_dead() given it's the only sub-CPUHP_TEARDOWN_CPU callback that returns an error.
Failure isn't allowed in hotplug states before CPUHP_TEARDOWN_CPU so move the CPU offline callback to the ONLINE section where failure is possible.(CVE-2026-53314)
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/virtio: Fix driver removal with disabled KMS
DRM atomic and modesetting aren't initialized if virtio-gpu driver built with disabled KMS, leading to access of uninitialized data on driver removal/unbinding and crashing kernel. Fix it by skipping shutting down atomic core with unavailable KMS.(CVE-2026-53347)
| URL | Type | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{
"affected": [
{
"ecosystem_specific": {
"aarch64": [
"bpftool-6.6.0-145.3.26.157.oe2403sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.3.26.157.oe2403sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-6.6.0-145.3.26.157.oe2403sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.3.26.157.oe2403sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-6.6.0-145.3.26.157.oe2403sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-6.6.0-145.3.26.157.oe2403sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-extra-modules-6.6.0-145.3.26.157.oe2403sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-6.6.0-145.3.26.157.oe2403sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-source-6.6.0-145.3.26.157.oe2403sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-6.6.0-145.3.26.157.oe2403sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.3.26.157.oe2403sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-6.6.0-145.3.26.157.oe2403sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-6.6.0-145.3.26.157.oe2403sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.3.26.157.oe2403sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-6.6.0-145.3.26.157.oe2403sp3.aarch64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.3.26.157.oe2403sp3.aarch64.rpm"
],
"src": [
"kernel-6.6.0-145.3.26.157.oe2403sp3.src.rpm"
],
"x86_64": [
"bpftool-6.6.0-145.3.26.157.oe2403sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"bpftool-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.3.26.157.oe2403sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-6.6.0-145.3.26.157.oe2403sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.3.26.157.oe2403sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-debugsource-6.6.0-145.3.26.157.oe2403sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-devel-6.6.0-145.3.26.157.oe2403sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-extra-modules-6.6.0-145.3.26.157.oe2403sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-headers-6.6.0-145.3.26.157.oe2403sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-source-6.6.0-145.3.26.157.oe2403sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-6.6.0-145.3.26.157.oe2403sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.3.26.157.oe2403sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"kernel-tools-devel-6.6.0-145.3.26.157.oe2403sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-6.6.0-145.3.26.157.oe2403sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.3.26.157.oe2403sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-6.6.0-145.3.26.157.oe2403sp3.x86_64.rpm",
"python3-perf-debuginfo-6.6.0-145.3.26.157.oe2403sp3.x86_64.rpm"
]
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "openEuler:24.03-LTS-SP3",
"name": "kernel",
"purl": "pkg:rpm/openEuler/kernel\u0026distro=openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "6.6.0-145.3.26.157.oe2403sp3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"database_specific": {
"severity": "Critical"
},
"details": "The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nxfs: remove xfs_attr_leaf_hasname\n\nThe calling convention of xfs_attr_leaf_hasname() is problematic, because\nit returns a NULL buffer when xfs_attr3_leaf_read fails, a valid buffer\nwhen xfs_attr3_leaf_lookup_int returns -ENOATTR or -EEXIST, and a\nnon-NULL buffer pointer for an already released buffer when\nxfs_attr3_leaf_lookup_int fails with other error values.\n\nFix this by simply open coding xfs_attr_leaf_hasname in the callers, so\nthat the buffer release code is done by each caller of\nxfs_attr3_leaf_read.(CVE-2026-43153)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nx86/kexec: Disable KCOV instrumentation after load_segments()\n\nThe load_segments() function changes segment registers, invalidating GS base\n(which KCOV relies on for per-cpu data). When CONFIG_KCOV is enabled, any\nsubsequent instrumented C code call (e.g. native_gdt_invalidate()) begins\ncrashing the kernel in an endless loop.\n\nTo reproduce the problem, it\u0026apos;s sufficient to do kexec on a KCOV-instrumented\nkernel:\n\n $ kexec -l /boot/otherKernel\n $ kexec -e\n\nThe real-world context for this problem is enabling crash dump collection in\nsyzkaller. For this, the tool loads a panic kernel before fuzzing and then\ncalls makedumpfile after the panic. This workflow requires both CONFIG_KEXEC\nand CONFIG_KCOV to be enabled simultaneously.\n\nAdding safeguards directly to the KCOV fast-path (__sanitizer_cov_trace_pc())\nis also undesirable as it would introduce an extra performance overhead.\n\nDisabling instrumentation for the individual functions would be too fragile,\nso disable KCOV instrumentation for the entire machine_kexec_64.c and\nphysaddr.c. If coverage-guided fuzzing ever needs these components in the\nfuture, other approaches should be considered.\n\nThe problem is not relevant for 32 bit kernels as CONFIG_KCOV is not supported\nthere.\n\n [ bp: Space out comment for better readability. ](CVE-2026-43331)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnvmet-tcp: fix race between ICReq handling and queue teardown\n\nnvmet_tcp_handle_icreq() updates queue-\u0026gt;state after sending an\nInitialization Connection Response (ICResp), but it does so without\nserializing against target-side queue teardown.\n\nIf an NVMe/TCP host sends an Initialization Connection Request\n(ICReq) and immediately closes the connection, target-side teardown\nmay start in softirq context before io_work drains the already\nbuffered ICReq. In that case, nvmet_tcp_schedule_release_queue()\nsets queue-\u0026gt;state to NVMET_TCP_Q_DISCONNECTING and drops the queue\nreference under state_lock.\n\nIf io_work later processes that ICReq, nvmet_tcp_handle_icreq() can\nstill overwrite the state back to NVMET_TCP_Q_LIVE. That defeats the\nDISCONNECTING-state guard in nvmet_tcp_schedule_release_queue() and\nallows a later socket state change to re-enter teardown and issue a\nsecond kref_put() on an already released queue.\n\nThe ICResp send failure path has the same problem. If teardown has\nalready moved the queue to DISCONNECTING, a send error can still\noverwrite the state with NVMET_TCP_Q_FAILED, again reopening the\nwindow for a second teardown path to drop the queue reference.\n\nFix this by serializing both post-send state transitions with\nstate_lock and bailing out if teardown has already started.\n\nUse -ESHUTDOWN as an internal sentinel for that bail-out path rather\nthan propagating it as a transport error like -ECONNRESET. Keep\nnvmet_tcp_socket_error() setting rcv_state to NVMET_TCP_RECV_ERR before\nhonoring that sentinel so receive-side parsing stays quiesced until the\nexisting release path completes.(CVE-2026-46135)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnetfilter: nf_tables: use list_del_rcu for netlink hooks\n\nnft_netdev_unregister_hooks and __nft_unregister_flowtable_net_hooks need\nto use list_del_rcu(), this list can be walked by concurrent dumpers.\n\nAdd a new helper and use it consistently.(CVE-2026-46324)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nRDMA: During rereg_mr ensure that REREG_ACCESS is compatible\n\nIf IB_MR_REREG_ACCESS changes from RO to RW then the umem has to be\nre-evaluated to ensure it is properly pinned as RW. Since the umem is\nhidden inside each driver\u0026apos;s mr struct add a ib_umem_check_rereg() function\nthat each driver has to call before processing IB_MR_REREG_ACCESS.\n\nmlx4 has to retain its duplicate ib_access_writable check because it\nimplements IB_MR_REREG_ACCESS | IB_MR_REREG_TRANS by changing both items\nin place sequentially while the MR is live, so it will continue to not\nsupport this combination.(CVE-2026-52908)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nBluetooth: serialize accept_q access\n\nbt_sock_poll() walks the accept queue without synchronization, while\nchild teardown can unlink the same socket and drop its last reference.\nThe unsynchronized accept queue walk has existed since the initial\nBluetooth import.\n\nProtect accept_q with a dedicated lock for queue updates and polling.\nAlso rework bt_accept_dequeue() to take temporary child references under\nthe queue lock before dropping it and locking the child socket.(CVE-2026-52918)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nipc: limit next_id allocation to the valid ID range\n\nThe checkpoint/restore sysctl path can request the next SysV IPC id\nthrough ids-\u0026gt;next_id. ipc_idr_alloc() currently forwards that request to\nidr_alloc() with an open-ended upper bound.\n\nIf the valid tail of the SysV IPC id space is full, the allocation can\nspill beyond ipc_mni. The returned SysV IPC id still uses the normal\nindex encoding, so later lookup and removal can target the wrong slot. \nThis leaves the real IDR entry behind and breaks the IDR state for the\nobject.\n\nThe bug is in ipc_idr_alloc() in the checkpoint/restore path.\n\n1. ids-\u0026gt;next_id is passed to:\n\n idr_alloc(\u0026amp;ids-\u0026gt;ipcs_idr, new, ipcid_to_idx(next_id), 0, ...)\n\n2. The zero upper bound makes the allocation effectively open-ended.\n Once the valid SysV IPC tail is occupied, idr_alloc() can spill past\n ipc_mni and allocate an entry beyond the valid IPC id range.\n\n3. The new object id is still encoded with the narrower SysV IPC index\n width:\n\n new-\u0026gt;id = (new-\u0026gt;seq \u0026lt;\u0026lt; ipcmni_seq_shift()) + idx\n\n4. Later removal goes through ipc_rmid(), which uses:\n\n ipcid_to_idx(ipcp-\u0026gt;id)\n\n That truncates the real IDR index. An object actually stored at a\n high index can then be removed as if it lived at a low in-range\n index.\n\n5. For shared memory, shm_destroy() frees the current object anyway, but\n the real high IDR slot is left behind as a dangling pointer.\n\n6. A subsequent walk of /proc/sysvipc/shm reaches the stale IDR entry\n and dereferences freed memory.\n\nPrevent this by bounding the requested allocation to ipc_mni so the\ncheckpoint/restore path fails once the valid range is exhausted.(CVE-2026-52923)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nipc/shm: serialize orphan cleanup with shm_nattch updates\n\nshm_destroy_orphaned() walks the shm idr under shm_ids(ns).rwsem, but that\ndoes not serialize all fields tested by shm_may_destroy(). In particular,\nshm_nattch is updated while holding shm_perm.lock, and attach paths can do\nthat without holding the rwsem.\n\nDo not decide that an orphaned segment is unused before taking the object\nlock. Move the shm_may_destroy() check under shm_perm.lock, matching the\nother destroy paths, and unlock the segment when it no longer qualifies\nfor removal.(CVE-2026-52930)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ni2c: dev: prevent integer overflow in I2C_TIMEOUT ioctl\n\nWhile fuzzing with Syzkaller, a persistent `schedule_timeout: wrong\ntimeout value` warning was observed, accompanied by SMBus controller\nstate machine corruption.\n\nThe I2C_TIMEOUT ioctl accepts a user-provided timeout in multiples of\n10 ms. The user argument is checked against INT_MAX, but it is\nsubsequently multiplied by 10 before being passed to msecs_to_jiffies().\n\nA malicious user can pass a large value (e.g., 429496729) that passes\nthe `arg \u0026gt; INT_MAX` check but overflows when multiplied by 10. This\nresults in a truncated 32-bit unsigned value that bypasses the\ninternal `(int)m \u0026lt; 0` check in `msecs_to_jiffies()`.\n\nThe truncated value is then assigned to `client-\u0026gt;adapter-\u0026gt;timeout`\n(a signed 32-bit int), which is reinterpreted as a negative number.\nWhen passed to wait_for_completion_timeout(), this negative value\nundergoes sign extension to a 64-bit unsigned long, triggering the\n`schedule_timeout` warning and causing premature returns. This leaves\nthe SMBus state machine in an unrecoverable state, constituting a\nlocal Denial of Service (DoS).\n\nFix this by bounding the user argument to `INT_MAX / 10`.\n\n[wsa: move the comment as well](CVE-2026-52948)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\niommu/vt-d: Fix oops due to out of scope access\n\nBelow oops triggers when kill QEMU process:\n\n Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x7fffffff844eaaa7: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI\n Call Trace:\n \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n do_raw_spin_lock+0xaa/0xc0\n _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x21/0x40\n domain_remove_dev_pasid+0x52/0x160\n intel_nested_set_dev_pasid+0x1b9/0x1e0\n __iommu_set_group_pasid+0x56/0x120\n pci_dev_reset_iommu_done+0xe3/0x180\n pcie_flr+0x65/0x160\n __pci_reset_function_locked+0x5b/0x120\n vfio_pci_core_close_device+0x63/0xe0 [vfio_pci_core]\n vfio_df_close+0x4f/0xa0\n vfio_df_unbind_iommufd+0x2d/0x60\n vfio_device_fops_release+0x3e/0x40\n __fput+0xe5/0x2c0\n task_work_run+0x58/0xa0\n do_exit+0x2c8/0x600\n do_group_exit+0x2f/0xa0\n get_signal+0x863/0x8c0\n arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x24/0x100\n exit_to_user_mode_loop+0x87/0x380\n do_syscall_64+0x2ff/0x11e0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e\n\nThe global static blocked domain is a dummy domain without corresponding\ndmar_domain structure, accessing beyond iommu_domain structure triggers\noops easily. Fix it by return early in domain_remove_dev_pasid() like\nidentity domain.(CVE-2026-52953)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nceph: fix BUG_ON in __ceph_build_xattrs_blob() due to stale blob size\n\nThe generic/642 test-case can reproduce the kernel crash:\n\n[40243.605254] ------------[ cut here ]------------\n[40243.605956] kernel BUG at fs/ceph/xattr.c:918!\n[40243.607142] Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI\n[40243.608067] CPU: 7 UID: 0 PID: 498762 Comm: kworker/7:1 Not tainted 7.0.0-rc7+ #3 PREEMPT(full)\n[40243.609700] Hardware name: QEMU Ubuntu 25.10 PC v2 (i440FX + PIIX, + 10.1 machine, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014\n[40243.611820] Workqueue: ceph-msgr ceph_con_workfn\n[40243.612715] RIP: 0010:__ceph_build_xattrs_blob+0x1b8/0x1e0\n[40243.613731] Code: 0f 84 82 fe ff ff e9 cf 8e 56 ff 48 8d 65 e8 31 c0 5b 41 5c 41 5d 5d 31 d2 31 c9 31 f6 31 ff 45 31 c0 45 31 c9 c3 cc cc cc cc \u0026lt;0f\u0026gt; 0b 4c 8b 62 08 41 8b 85 24 07 00 00 49 83 c4 04 41 89 44 24 fc\n[40243.616888] RSP: 0018:ffffcc80c4d4b688 EFLAGS: 00010287\n[40243.617773] RAX: 0000000000010026 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 0000000000000000\n[40243.618928] RDX: ffff8a773798dee0 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000\n[40243.620158] RBP: ffffcc80c4d4b6a0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000\n[40243.621573] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8a75f3b58000\n[40243.622907] R13: ffff8a75f3b58000 R14: 0000000000000080 R15: 000000000000bffd\n[40243.624054] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8a787d1b4000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\n[40243.625331] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n[40243.626269] CR2: 000072f390b623c0 CR3: 000000011c02a003 CR4: 0000000000372ef0\n[40243.627408] Call Trace:\n[40243.627839] \u0026lt;TASK\u0026gt;\n[40243.628188] __prep_cap+0x3fd/0x4a0\n[40243.628789] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4e/0xe0\n[40243.629474] ceph_check_caps+0x46a/0xc80\n[40243.630094] ? __lock_acquire+0x4a2/0x2650\n[40243.630773] ? find_held_lock+0x31/0x90\n[40243.631347] ? handle_cap_grant+0x79f/0x1060\n[40243.632068] ? lock_release+0xd9/0x300\n[40243.632696] ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x3e/0x340\n[40243.633429] ? lock_release+0xd9/0x300\n[40243.634052] handle_cap_grant+0xcf6/0x1060\n[40243.634745] ceph_handle_caps+0x122b/0x2110\n[40243.635415] mds_dispatch+0x5bd/0x2160\n[40243.636034] ? ceph_con_process_message+0x65/0x190\n[40243.636828] ? lock_release+0xd9/0x300\n[40243.637431] ceph_con_process_message+0x7a/0x190\n[40243.638184] ? kfree+0x311/0x4f0\n[40243.638749] ? kfree+0x311/0x4f0\n[40243.639268] process_message+0x16/0x1a0\n[40243.639915] ? sg_free_table+0x39/0x90\n[40243.640572] ceph_con_v2_try_read+0xf58/0x2120\n[40243.641255] ? lock_acquire+0xc8/0x300\n[40243.641863] ceph_con_workfn+0x151/0x820\n[40243.642493] process_one_work+0x22f/0x630\n[40243.643093] ? process_one_work+0x254/0x630\n[40243.643770] worker_thread+0x1e2/0x400\n[40243.644332] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10\n[40243.645020] kthread+0x109/0x140\n[40243.645560] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10\n[40243.646125] ret_from_fork+0x3f8/0x480\n[40243.646752] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10\n[40243.647316] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10\n[40243.647919] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30\n[40243.648556] \u0026lt;/TASK\u0026gt;\n[40243.648902] Modules linked in: overlay hctr2 libpolyval chacha libchacha adiantum libnh libpoly1305 essiv intel_rapl_msr intel_rapl_common intel_uncore_frequency_common skx_edac_common nfit kvm_intel kvm irqbypass joydev ghash_clmulni_intel aesni_intel rapl input_leds mac_hid psmouse vga16fb serio_raw vgastate floppy i2c_piix4 pata_acpi bochs qemu_fw_cfg i2c_smbus sch_fq_codel rbd dm_crypt msr parport_pc ppdev lp parport efi_pstore\n[40243.654766] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---\n\nCommit d93231a6bc8a (\u0026quot;ceph: prevent a client from exceeding the MDS\nmaximum xattr size\u0026quot;) moved the required_blob_size computation to before\nthe __build_xattrs() call, introducing a race.\n\n__build_xattrs() releases and reacquires i_ceph_lock during execution.\nIn that window, handle_cap_grant() may update i_xattrs.blob with a\nnewer MDS-provided blob and bump i_xattrs.version. When\n__bui\n---truncated---(CVE-2026-52961)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nfsnotify: fix inode reference leak in fsnotify_recalc_mask()\n\nfsnotify_recalc_mask() fails to handle the return value of\n__fsnotify_recalc_mask(), which may return an inode pointer that needs\nto be released via fsnotify_drop_object() when the connector\u0026apos;s HAS_IREF\nflag transitions from set to cleared.\n\nThis manifests as a hung task with the following call trace:\n\n INFO: task umount:1234 blocked for more than 120 seconds.\n Call Trace:\n __schedule\n schedule\n fsnotify_sb_delete\n generic_shutdown_super\n kill_anon_super\n cleanup_mnt\n task_work_run\n do_exit\n do_group_exit\n\nThe race window that triggers the iref leak:\n\n Thread A (adding mark) Thread B (removing mark)\n \u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500 \u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\n fsnotify_add_mark_locked():\n fsnotify_add_mark_list():\n spin_lock(conn-\u0026gt;lock)\n add mark_B(evictable) to list\n spin_unlock(conn-\u0026gt;lock)\n return\n\n /* ---- gap: no lock held ---- */\n\n fsnotify_detach_mark(mark_A):\n spin_lock(mark_A-\u0026gt;lock)\n clear ATTACHED flag on mark_A\n spin_unlock(mark_A-\u0026gt;lock)\n fsnotify_put_mark(mark_A)\n\n fsnotify_recalc_mask():\n spin_lock(conn-\u0026gt;lock)\n __fsnotify_recalc_mask():\n /* mark_A skipped: ATTACHED cleared */\n /* only mark_B(evictable) remains */\n want_iref = false\n has_iref = true /* not yet cleared */\n -\u0026gt; HAS_IREF transitions true -\u0026gt; false\n -\u0026gt; returns inode pointer\n spin_unlock(conn-\u0026gt;lock)\n /* BUG: return value discarded!\n * iput() and fsnotify_put_sb_watched_objects()\n * are never called */\n\nFix this by deferring the transition true -\u0026gt; false of HAS_IREF flag from\nfsnotify_recalc_mask() (Thread A) to fsnotify_put_mark() (thread B).(CVE-2026-52990)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nsched/psi: fix race between file release and pressure write\n\nA potential race condition exists between pressure write and cgroup file\nrelease regarding the priv member of struct kernfs_open_file, which\ntriggers the uaf reported in [1].\n\nConsider the following scenario involving execution on two separate CPUs:\n\n CPU0\t\t\t\t\tCPU1\n ====\t\t\t\t\t====\n\t\t\t\t\tvfs_rmdir()\n\t\t\t\t\tkernfs_iop_rmdir()\n\t\t\t\t\tcgroup_rmdir()\n\t\t\t\t\tcgroup_kn_lock_live()\n\t\t\t\t\tcgroup_destroy_locked()\n\t\t\t\t\tcgroup_addrm_files()\n\t\t\t\t\tcgroup_rm_file()\n\t\t\t\t\tkernfs_remove_by_name()\n\t\t\t\t\tkernfs_remove_by_name_ns()\n vfs_write()\t\t\t\t__kernfs_remove()\n new_sync_write()\t\t\tkernfs_drain()\n kernfs_fop_write_iter()\t\tkernfs_drain_open_files()\n cgroup_file_write()\t\t\tkernfs_release_file()\n pressure_write()\t\t\tcgroup_file_release()\n ctx = of-\u0026gt;priv;\n\t\t\t\t\tkfree(ctx);\n \t\t\t\t\tof-\u0026gt;priv = NULL;\n\t\t\t\t\tcgroup_kn_unlock()\n cgroup_kn_lock_live()\n cgroup_get(cgrp)\n cgroup_kn_unlock()\n if (ctx-\u0026gt;psi.trigger) // here, trigger uaf for ctx, that is of-\u0026gt;priv\n\nThe cgroup_rmdir() is protected by the cgroup_mutex, it also safeguards\nthe memory deallocation of of-\u0026gt;priv performed within cgroup_file_release().\nHowever, the operations involving of-\u0026gt;priv executed within pressure_write()\nare not entirely covered by the protection of cgroup_mutex. Consequently,\nif the code in pressure_write(), specifically the section handling the\nctx variable executes after cgroup_file_release() has completed, a uaf\nvulnerability involving of-\u0026gt;priv is triggered.\n\nTherefore, the issue can be resolved by extending the scope of the\ncgroup_mutex lock within pressure_write() to encompass all code paths\ninvolving of-\u0026gt;priv, thereby properly synchronizing the race condition\noccurring between cgroup_file_release() and pressure_write().\n\nAnd, if an live kn lock can be successfully acquired while executing\nthe pressure write operation, it indicates that the cgroup deletion\nprocess has not yet reached its final stage; consequently, the priv\npointer within open_file cannot be NULL. Therefore, the operation to\nretrieve the ctx value must be moved to a point *after* the live kn\nlock has been successfully acquired.\n\nIn another situation, specifically after entering cgroup_kn_lock_live()\nbut before acquiring cgroup_mutex, there exists a different class of\nrace condition:\n\nCPU0: write memory.pressure CPU1: write cgroup.pressure=0\n===========================\t\t =============================\n\nkernfs_fop_write_iter()\n kernfs_get_active_of(of)\n pressure_write()\n cgroup_kn_lock_live(memory.pressure)\n cgroup_tryget(cgrp)\n kernfs_break_active_protection(kn)\n ... blocks on cgroup_mutex\n\n \t cgroup_pressure_write()\n \t cgroup_kn_lock_live(cgroup.pressure)\n \t cgroup_file_show(memory.pressure, false)\n \t kernfs_show(false)\n \t kernfs_drain_open_files()\n \t cgroup_file_release(of)\n \t kfree(ctx)\n \t of-\u0026gt;priv = NULL\n \t cgroup_kn_unlock()\n\n ... acquires cgroup_mutex\n ctx = of-\u0026gt;priv; // may now be NULL\n if (ctx-\u0026gt;psi.trigger) // NULL dereference\n\nConsequently, there is a possibility that of-\u0026gt;priv is NULL, the pressure\nwrite needs to check for this.\n\nNow that the scope of the cgroup_mutex has been expanded, the original\nexplicit cgroup_get/put operations are no longer necessary, this is\nbecause acquiring/releasing the live kn lock inherently executes a\ncgroup get/put operation.\n\n[1]\nBUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in pressure_write+0xa4/0x210 kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:4011\nCall Trace:\n pressure_write+0xa4/0x210 kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:4011\n cgroup_file_write+0x36f/0x790 kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:43\n---truncated---(CVE-2026-52991)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nerofs: unify lcn as u64 for 32-bit platforms\n\nAs sashiko reported [1], `lcn` was typed as `unsigned long` (or\n`unsigned int` sometimes), which is only 32 bits wide on 32-bit\nplatforms, which causes `(lcn \u0026lt;\u0026lt; lclusterbits)` to be truncated\nat 4 GiB.\n\nIn order to consolidate the logic, just use `u64` consistently\naround the codebase.\n\n[1] https://sashiko.dev/r/20260420034612.1899973-1-hsiangkao%40linux.alibaba.com(CVE-2026-53015)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\niommu/amd: Fix clone_alias() to use the original device\u0026apos;s devid\n\nCurrently clone_alias() assumes first argument (pdev) is always the\noriginal device pointer. This function is called by\npci_for_each_dma_alias() which based on topology decides to send\noriginal or alias device details in first argument.\n\nThis meant that the source devid used to look up and copy the DTE\nmay be incorrect, leading to wrong or stale DTE entries being\npropagated to alias device.\n\nFix this by passing the original pdev as the opaque data argument to\nboth the direct clone_alias() call and pci_for_each_dma_alias(). Inside\nclone_alias(), retrieve the original device from data and compute devid\nfrom it.(CVE-2026-53053)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nperf/amd/ibs: Avoid calling perf_allow_kernel() from the IBS NMI handler\n\nCalling perf_allow_kernel() from the NMI context is unsafe and could be\nfatal. Capture the permission at event-initialization time by storing it\nin event-\u0026gt;hw.flags, and have the NMI handler rely on that cached flag\ninstead of making the call directly.(CVE-2026-53114)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nlocking/rtmutex: Skip remove_waiter() when waiter is not enqueued\n\nsyzbot triggered the following splat in remove_waiter() via\nFUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI:\n\n KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000a88-0x0000000000000a8f]\n class_raw_spinlock_constructor\n remove_waiter+0x159/0x1200 kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:1561\n rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock+0x103/0x120\n futex_requeue+0x10e4/0x20d0\n __x64_sys_futex+0x34f/0x4d0\n\ntask_blocks_on_rt_mutex() does not arm the waiter upon deadlock detection,\nleaving waiter-\u0026gt;task nil, where 3bfdc63936dd (\u0026quot;rtmutex: Use waiter::task instead\nof current in remove_waiter()\u0026quot;) made this fatal.\n\nFurthermore, rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() should not be calling into remove_waiter()\nupon a successfully grabbing the rtmutex. 1a1fb985f2e2 (\u0026quot;futex: Handle early deadlock\nreturn correctly\u0026quot;), moved the remove_waiter() out of __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock()\n(where \u0026apos;ret\u0026apos; was only ever 0 or \u0026lt; 0) into the wrapper. Tighten this check to\naccount for try_to_take_rt_mutex().(CVE-2026-53163)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nUSB: serial: kl5kusb105: fix bulk-out buffer overflow\n\nklsi_105_prepare_write_buffer() is called by the generic write path\nwith the bulk-out buffer and its size (bulk_out_size, 64 bytes). It\nstores a two-byte length header at the start of the buffer and copies\nthe payload from the write fifo starting at buf + KLSI_HDR_LEN, but\npasses the full buffer size as the number of bytes to copy:\n\n count = kfifo_out_locked(\u0026amp;port-\u0026gt;write_fifo, buf + KLSI_HDR_LEN,\n size, \u0026amp;port-\u0026gt;lock);\n\nWhen the fifo holds at least size bytes, size bytes are copied starting\ntwo bytes into the size-byte buffer, writing KLSI_HDR_LEN bytes past its\nend. Copy at most size - KLSI_HDR_LEN bytes instead, leaving room for\nthe header as safe_serial already does.\n\nWriting bulk_out_size or more bytes to the tty triggers a slab\nout-of-bounds write, observed with KASAN by emulating the device with\ndummy_hcd and raw-gadget:\n\n BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in kfifo_copy_out+0x83/0xc0\n Write of size 64 at addr ffff888112c62202 by task python3\n kfifo_copy_out\n klsi_105_prepare_write_buffer [kl5kusb105]\n usb_serial_generic_write_start [usbserial]\n Allocated by task 139:\n usb_serial_probe [usbserial]\n The buggy address is located 2 bytes inside of allocated 64-byte region\n\nThe out-of-bounds write no longer occurs with this change applied.(CVE-2026-53194)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nUSB: serial: io_ti: fix heap overflow in get_manuf_info()\n\nget_manuf_info() reads le16_to_cpu(rom_desc-\u0026gt;Size) bytes from the\ndevice I2C EEPROM into a buffer allocated with kmalloc_obj(), which\nis sizeof(struct edge_ti_manuf_descriptor) = 10 bytes.\n\nThe Size field comes from the device and is only validated (in\ncheck_i2c_image()) to make sure the descriptor fits within\nTI_MAX_I2C_SIZE (16384 bytes), not against the destination buffer size.\nA malicious USB device can therefore set Size to any value up to 16377,\ncausing a heap overflow of up to 16367 bytes when plugged into a host\nrunning this driver.\n\nvalid_csum() is called after read_rom() and also iterates\nbuffer[0..Size-1], compounding the out-of-bounds access.\n\nFix by rejecting descriptors with unexpected length before calling\nread_rom().\n\n[ johan: amend commit message; also check for short descriptors ](CVE-2026-53196)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nl2tp: pppol2tp: hold reference to session in pppol2tp_ioctl()\n\npppol2tp_ioctl() read sock-\u0026gt;sk-\u0026gt;sk_user_data directly without any\nlocks or reference counting. If a controllable sleep was induced during\ncopy_from_user() (e.g. via a userfaultfd page fault sleep), a concurrent\nsocket close could trigger pppol2tp_session_close() asynchronously. This\nfrees the l2tp_session structure via the l2tp_session_del_work workqueue.\nUpon resuming, the ioctl thread dereferences the stale session pointer,\nresulting in a Use-After-Free (UAF).\n\nFix this by securely fetching the session reference using the RCU-safe,\nrefcounted helper pppol2tp_sock_to_session(sk) on entry. This locks the\nsession\u0026apos;s refcount across the sleep. We structured the function to exit\nvia standard err breaks, guaranteeing that l2tp_session_put() is cleanly\ncalled on all return paths to drop the reference.\n\nTo preserve existing behavior we validate the session and its magic\nsignature only for the specific L2TP commands that require it. This\nensures that generic/unknown ioctls called on an unconnected socket\nstill return -ENOIOCTLCMD and correctly fall back to generic handlers\n(e.g. in sock_do_ioctl()).(CVE-2026-53262)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndrm/amd/display: Wrap DCN32 phantom-plane allocation in DC_RUN_WITH_PREEMPTION_ENABLED\n\n[Why]\ndcn32_validate_bandwidth() wraps dcn32_internal_validate_bw() with\nDC_FP_START()/DC_FP_END(). In x86 non-RT, DC_FP_START takes fpregs_lock(),\nwhich disables local softirqs.\n\nThe DML1 path through dcn32_enable_phantom_plane() calls kvzalloc() to\nallocate ~335 KiB for dc_plane_state. This triggers the vmalloc path,\nwhich calls BUG_ON(in_interrupt()) because it\u0026apos;s invoked within the\nFPU-enabled (softirq disabled) region, leading to a kernel crash.\n\n[How]\nWrap the dc_state_create_phantom_plane() call with the\nDC_RUN_WITH_PREEMPTION_ENABLED() macro to allow preemption during\nthis memory allocation.\n\n(cherry picked from commit 885ccbef7b94a8b38f69c4211c679021aa27ad11)(CVE-2026-53285)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndrm/amd/display: Avoid NULL dereference in dc_dmub_srv error paths\n\nIn dc_dmub_srv_log_diagnostic_data() and\ndc_dmub_srv_enable_dpia_trace().\n\nBoth functions check:\n\n if (!dc_dmub_srv || !dc_dmub_srv-\u0026gt;dmub)\n\nand then call DC_LOG_ERROR() inside that block.\n\nDC_LOG_ERROR() uses dc_dmub_srv-\u0026gt;ctx internally. So if\ndc_dmub_srv is NULL, the logging itself can dereference a\nNULL pointer and cause a crash.\n\nFix this by splitting the checks.\n\nFirst check if dc_dmub_srv is NULL and return immediately.\nThen check dc_dmub_srv-\u0026gt;dmub and log the error only when\ndc_dmub_srv is valid.\n\nFixes the below:\n../display/dc/dc_dmub_srv.c:962 dc_dmub_srv_log_diagnostic_data() error: we previously assumed \u0026apos;dc_dmub_srv\u0026apos; could be null (see line 961)\n../display/dc/dc_dmub_srv.c:1167 dc_dmub_srv_enable_dpia_trace() error: we previously assumed \u0026apos;dc_dmub_srv\u0026apos; could be null (see line 1166)(CVE-2026-53313)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\npadata: Put CPU offline callback in ONLINE section to allow failure\n\nsyzbot reported the following warning:\n\n DEAD callback error for CPU1\n WARNING: kernel/cpu.c:1463 at _cpu_down+0x759/0x1020 kernel/cpu.c:1463, CPU#0: syz.0.1960/14614\n\nat commit 4ae12d8bd9a8 (\u0026quot;Merge tag \u0026apos;kbuild-fixes-7.0-2\u0026apos; of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kbuild/linux\u0026quot;)\nwhich tglx traced to padata_cpu_dead() given it\u0026apos;s the only\nsub-CPUHP_TEARDOWN_CPU callback that returns an error.\n\nFailure isn\u0026apos;t allowed in hotplug states before CPUHP_TEARDOWN_CPU\nso move the CPU offline callback to the ONLINE section where failure is\npossible.(CVE-2026-53314)\n\nIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndrm/virtio: Fix driver removal with disabled KMS\n\nDRM atomic and modesetting aren\u0026apos;t initialized if virtio-gpu driver built\nwith disabled KMS, leading to access of uninitialized data on driver\nremoval/unbinding and crashing kernel. Fix it by skipping shutting down\natomic core with unavailable KMS.(CVE-2026-53347)",
"id": "OESA-2026-3455",
"modified": "2026-08-20T09:59:57Z",
"published": "2026-08-20T09:59:57Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2026-3455"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43153"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43331"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-46135"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-46324"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-52908"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-52918"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-52923"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-52930"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-52948"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-52953"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-52961"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-52990"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-52991"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53015"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53053"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53114"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53163"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53194"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53196"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53262"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53285"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53313"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53314"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53347"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.2",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "kernel security update",
"upstream": [
"CVE-2026-43153",
"CVE-2026-43331",
"CVE-2026-46135",
"CVE-2026-46324",
"CVE-2026-52908",
"CVE-2026-52918",
"CVE-2026-52923",
"CVE-2026-52930",
"CVE-2026-52948",
"CVE-2026-52953",
"CVE-2026-52961",
"CVE-2026-52990",
"CVE-2026-52991",
"CVE-2026-53015",
"CVE-2026-53053",
"CVE-2026-53114",
"CVE-2026-53163",
"CVE-2026-53194",
"CVE-2026-53196",
"CVE-2026-53262",
"CVE-2026-53285",
"CVE-2026-53313",
"CVE-2026-53314",
"CVE-2026-53347"
]
}
OPENSUSE-SU-2026:21388-1
Vulnerability from csaf_opensuse - Published: 2026-07-21 08:27 - Updated: 2026-09-17 17:39SUSE-SU-2026:22742-1
Vulnerability from csaf_suse - Published: 2026-07-21 08:27 - Updated: 2026-09-16 20:05Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.