CVE-2026-55866 (GCVE-0-2026-55866)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-14 17:23 – Updated: 2026-09-14 18:15
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
SpiceDBChecks involving relations with caveats can result in unconditional permission when conditional permission is expected
Summary
SpiceDB is an open source database system for creating and managing security-critical application permissions. From 1.34.0 until 1.54.0, SpiceDB can return PERMISSIONSHIP_HAS_PERMISSION instead of PERMISSIONSHIP_CONDITIONAL_PERMISSION or PERMISSIONSHIP_NO_PERMISSION because checkRequestToKey() and checkRequestToKeyWithCanonical() in internal/dispatch/keys/computed.go omit CheckHints when constructing dispatch Check cache keys. The incorrect result requires a permission combining relations with intersection or exclusion, a subject reachable through caveated and non-caveated branches, LookupResources with a context parameter running concurrently with CheckPermission or CheckBulkPermissions for the same resource and subject, and an enabled dispatch result cache. Under these conditions, a result computed for one hint set can poison the cache entry used by a semantically different authorization check, allowing permission without satisfying the caveat. This issue is fixed in version 1.54.0.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-09-14 18:15 UTC
CWE
- CWE-863 - Incorrect Authorization
Assigner
References
5 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/authzed/spicedb/security/advis… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/authzed/spicedb/pull/3188 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/authzed/spicedb/commit/44a1c9f… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/authzed/spicedb/commit/ccde792… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/authzed/spicedb/releases/tag/v1.54.0 | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-55866",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-14T18:15:32.043031Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-14T18:15:41.075Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "spicedb",
"vendor": "authzed",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 1.34.1, \u003c 1.54.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "SpiceDB is an open source database system for creating and managing security-critical application permissions. From 1.34.0 until 1.54.0, SpiceDB can return PERMISSIONSHIP_HAS_PERMISSION instead of PERMISSIONSHIP_CONDITIONAL_PERMISSION or PERMISSIONSHIP_NO_PERMISSION because checkRequestToKey() and checkRequestToKeyWithCanonical() in internal/dispatch/keys/computed.go omit CheckHints when constructing dispatch Check cache keys. The incorrect result requires a permission combining relations with intersection or exclusion, a subject reachable through caveated and non-caveated branches, LookupResources with a context parameter running concurrently with CheckPermission or CheckBulkPermissions for the same resource and subject, and an enabled dispatch result cache. Under these conditions, a result computed for one hint set can poison the cache entry used by a semantically different authorization check, allowing permission without satisfying the caveat. This issue is fixed in version 1.54.0."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 3.7,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-863",
"description": "CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-14T17:23:56.428Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/authzed/spicedb/security/advisories/GHSA-4vrg-r928-h5vv",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/authzed/spicedb/security/advisories/GHSA-4vrg-r928-h5vv"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/authzed/spicedb/pull/3188",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/authzed/spicedb/pull/3188"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/authzed/spicedb/commit/44a1c9f266bd8a884bfebfc27181210302541b9b",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/authzed/spicedb/commit/44a1c9f266bd8a884bfebfc27181210302541b9b"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/authzed/spicedb/commit/ccde792fc48750740d025d4286d5c2c88614cd30",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/authzed/spicedb/commit/ccde792fc48750740d025d4286d5c2c88614cd30"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/authzed/spicedb/releases/tag/v1.54.0",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/authzed/spicedb/releases/tag/v1.54.0"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-4vrg-r928-h5vv",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "SpiceDBChecks involving relations with caveats can result in unconditional permission when conditional permission is expected"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-55866",
"datePublished": "2026-09-14T17:23:56.428Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-06-17T16:44:40.996Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-14T18:15:41.075Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-55866",
"date": "2026-09-15",
"epss": "0.00219",
"percentile": "0.12499"
},
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-55866\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"published\":\"2026-09-14T18:17:56.150\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-09-14T19:17:33.193\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Received\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"SpiceDB is an open source database system for creating and managing security-critical application permissions. From 1.34.0 until 1.54.0, SpiceDB can return PERMISSIONSHIP_HAS_PERMISSION instead of PERMISSIONSHIP_CONDITIONAL_PERMISSION or PERMISSIONSHIP_NO_PERMISSION because checkRequestToKey() and checkRequestToKeyWithCanonical() in internal/dispatch/keys/computed.go omit CheckHints when constructing dispatch Check cache keys. The incorrect result requires a permission combining relations with intersection or exclusion, a subject reachable through caveated and non-caveated branches, LookupResources with a context parameter running concurrently with CheckPermission or CheckBulkPermissions for the same resource and subject, and an enabled dispatch result cache. Under these conditions, a result computed for one hint set can poison the cache entry used by a semantically different authorization check, allowing permission without satisfying the caveat. This issue is fixed in version 1.54.0.\"}],\"affected\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"affectedData\":[{\"vendor\":\"authzed\",\"product\":\"spicedb\",\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"\u003e= 1.34.1, \u003c 1.54.0\",\"status\":\"affected\"}]}]}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N\",\"baseScore\":3.7,\"baseSeverity\":\"LOW\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.2,\"impactScore\":1.4}],\"ssvcV203\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"ssvcData\":{\"timestamp\":\"2026-09-14T18:15:32.043031Z\",\"id\":\"CVE-2026-55866\",\"options\":[{\"exploitation\":\"none\"},{\"automatable\":\"no\"},{\"technicalImpact\":\"partial\"}],\"role\":\"CISA Coordinator\",\"version\":\"2.0.3\"}}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-863\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/authzed/spicedb/commit/44a1c9f266bd8a884bfebfc27181210302541b9b\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/authzed/spicedb/commit/ccde792fc48750740d025d4286d5c2c88614cd30\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/authzed/spicedb/pull/3188\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/authzed/spicedb/releases/tag/v1.54.0\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/authzed/spicedb/security/advisories/GHSA-4vrg-r928-h5vv\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\"}]}}",
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": "{\"cna\": {\"title\": \"SpiceDBChecks involving relations with caveats can result in unconditional permission when conditional permission is expected\", \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"cweId\": \"CWE-863\", \"lang\": \"en\", \"description\": \"CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization\", \"type\": \"CWE\"}]}], \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"attackComplexity\": \"HIGH\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"baseScore\": 3.7, \"baseSeverity\": \"LOW\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"integrityImpact\": \"LOW\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N\", \"version\": \"3.1\"}}], \"references\": [{\"name\": \"https://github.com/authzed/spicedb/security/advisories/GHSA-4vrg-r928-h5vv\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_CONFIRM\"], \"url\": \"https://github.com/authzed/spicedb/security/advisories/GHSA-4vrg-r928-h5vv\"}, {\"name\": \"https://github.com/authzed/spicedb/pull/3188\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"], \"url\": \"https://github.com/authzed/spicedb/pull/3188\"}, {\"name\": \"https://github.com/authzed/spicedb/commit/44a1c9f266bd8a884bfebfc27181210302541b9b\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"], \"url\": \"https://github.com/authzed/spicedb/commit/44a1c9f266bd8a884bfebfc27181210302541b9b\"}, {\"name\": \"https://github.com/authzed/spicedb/commit/ccde792fc48750740d025d4286d5c2c88614cd30\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"], \"url\": \"https://github.com/authzed/spicedb/commit/ccde792fc48750740d025d4286d5c2c88614cd30\"}, {\"name\": \"https://github.com/authzed/spicedb/releases/tag/v1.54.0\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_MISC\"], \"url\": \"https://github.com/authzed/spicedb/releases/tag/v1.54.0\"}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"authzed\", \"product\": \"spicedb\", \"versions\": [{\"version\": \"\u003e= 1.34.1, \u003c 1.54.0\", \"status\": \"affected\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"shortName\": \"GitHub_M\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-09-14T17:23:56.428Z\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"SpiceDB is an open source database system for creating and managing security-critical application permissions. From 1.34.0 until 1.54.0, SpiceDB can return PERMISSIONSHIP_HAS_PERMISSION instead of PERMISSIONSHIP_CONDITIONAL_PERMISSION or PERMISSIONSHIP_NO_PERMISSION because checkRequestToKey() and checkRequestToKeyWithCanonical() in internal/dispatch/keys/computed.go omit CheckHints when constructing dispatch Check cache keys. The incorrect result requires a permission combining relations with intersection or exclusion, a subject reachable through caveated and non-caveated branches, LookupResources with a context parameter running concurrently with CheckPermission or CheckBulkPermissions for the same resource and subject, and an enabled dispatch result cache. Under these conditions, a result computed for one hint set can poison the cache entry used by a semantically different authorization check, allowing permission without satisfying the caveat. This issue is fixed in version 1.54.0.\"}], \"source\": {\"advisory\": \"GHSA-4vrg-r928-h5vv\", \"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}}, \"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-55866\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-09-14T18:15:32.043031Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-09-14T18:15:36.347Z\"}}]}",
"cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-55866\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"assignerShortName\": \"GitHub_M\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-06-17T16:44:40.996Z\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-09-14T17:23:56.428Z\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-09-14T18:15:41.075Z\"}",
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Loading…
Loading…