CVE-2026-57879 (GCVE-0-2026-57879)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-06-26 07:17 – Updated: 2026-06-26 15:57
VLAI
Title
GV-LPC2011/LPC2211 - unauthorized buffer overflow via AuthMode/AuthValue path (ssvr)
Summary
An unauthenticated stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in ssvr in GeoVision GV-LPC2011 and GV-LPC2211 V1.12 and earlier. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient bounds checking when processing RTSP custom authentication data. A remote attacker may exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted RTSP request, resulting in memory corruption, denial of service, or potentially arbitrary code execution.
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: yes Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
  • CWE-121 - Stack-based buffer overflow
Assigner
GV
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
GeoVision Inc. GV-LPCLPC2011/2211 Affected: 1.12
Unaffected: 1.13
Create a notification for this product.
Date Public
2026-06-26 02:55
Credits
Jincheng Wang (@winmt), Professor Le Yu of Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, and Professor Xiapu Luo of The Hong Kong Polytechnic University has reported:
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-57879",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "total"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-06-26T15:55:55.481404Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-06-26T15:57:42.515Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "platforms": [
            "Linux"
          ],
          "product": "GV-LPCLPC2011/2211",
          "vendor": "GeoVision Inc.",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "1.12"
            },
            {
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "1.13"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "cpeApplicability": [
        {
          "nodes": [
            {
              "cpeMatch": [
                {
                  "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:geovision_inc.:gv-lpclpc2011_2211:1.12:*:linux:*:*:*:*:*",
                  "vulnerable": true
                },
                {
                  "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:geovision_inc.:gv-lpclpc2011_2211:1.13:*:linux:*:*:*:*:*",
                  "vulnerable": false
                }
              ],
              "negate": false,
              "operator": "OR"
            }
          ],
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "Jincheng Wang (@winmt), Professor Le Yu of Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, and Professor Xiapu Luo of The Hong Kong Polytechnic University has reported:"
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2026-06-26T02:55:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eAn unauthenticated\nstack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in ssvr in GeoVision\nGV-LPC2011 and GV-LPC2211 V1.12 and earlier. The vulnerability is caused by\ninsufficient bounds checking when processing RTSP custom authentication data. A\nremote attacker may exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted RTSP\nrequest, resulting in memory corruption, denial of service, or potentially\narbitrary code execution.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "An unauthenticated\nstack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in ssvr in GeoVision\nGV-LPC2011 and GV-LPC2211 V1.12 and earlier. The vulnerability is caused by\ninsufficient bounds checking when processing RTSP custom authentication data. A\nremote attacker may exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted RTSP\nrequest, resulting in memory corruption, denial of service, or potentially\narbitrary code execution."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-100",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-100 Overflow Buffers"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "baseScore": 9.8,
            "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
            "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-121",
              "description": "CWE-121 Stack-based buffer overflow",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-06-26T07:17:34.761Z",
        "orgId": "0df08a0e-a200-4957-9bb0-084f562506f9",
        "shortName": "GV"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://www.geovision.com.tw/cyber_security.php"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "EXTERNAL"
      },
      "timeline": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "time": "2026-06-17T07:08:00.000Z",
          "value": "Finder reports vulnerability to vendor"
        }
      ],
      "title": "GV-LPC2011/LPC2211 - unauthorized buffer overflow via AuthMode/AuthValue path (ssvr)",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.2"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "0df08a0e-a200-4957-9bb0-084f562506f9",
    "assignerShortName": "GV",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-57879",
    "datePublished": "2026-06-26T07:17:34.761Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-06-26T02:40:42.398Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-06-26T15:57:42.515Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2026-57879",
      "date": "2026-06-26",
      "epss": "0.0053",
      "percentile": "0.40734"
    },
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-57879\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"yes\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"total\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-06-26T15:55:55.481404Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-06-26T15:57:35.610Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"GV-LPC2011/LPC2211 - unauthorized buffer overflow via AuthMode/AuthValue path (ssvr)\", \"source\": {\"discovery\": \"EXTERNAL\"}, \"credits\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"finder\", \"value\": \"Jincheng Wang (@winmt), Professor Le Yu of Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, and Professor Xiapu Luo of The Hong Kong Polytechnic University has reported:\"}], \"impacts\": [{\"capecId\": \"CAPEC-100\", \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CAPEC-100 Overflow Buffers\"}]}], \"metrics\": [{\"format\": \"CVSS\", \"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 9.8, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"CRITICAL\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}, \"scenarios\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"GENERAL\"}]}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"GeoVision Inc.\", \"product\": \"GV-LPCLPC2011/2211\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"1.12\"}, {\"status\": \"unaffected\", \"version\": \"1.13\"}], \"platforms\": [\"Linux\"], \"defaultStatus\": \"unaffected\"}], \"timeline\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"time\": \"2026-06-17T07:08:00.000Z\", \"value\": \"Finder reports vulnerability to vendor\"}], \"datePublic\": \"2026-06-26T02:55:00.000Z\", \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://www.geovision.com.tw/cyber_security.php\"}], \"x_generator\": {\"engine\": \"Vulnogram 1.0.2\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"An unauthenticated\\nstack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in ssvr in GeoVision\\nGV-LPC2011 and GV-LPC2211 V1.12 and earlier. The vulnerability is caused by\\ninsufficient bounds checking when processing RTSP custom authentication data. A\\nremote attacker may exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted RTSP\\nrequest, resulting in memory corruption, denial of service, or potentially\\narbitrary code execution.\", \"supportingMedia\": [{\"type\": \"text/html\", \"value\": \"\u003cp\u003eAn unauthenticated\\nstack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in ssvr in GeoVision\\nGV-LPC2011 and GV-LPC2211 V1.12 and earlier. The vulnerability is caused by\\ninsufficient bounds checking when processing RTSP custom authentication data. A\\nremote attacker may exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted RTSP\\nrequest, resulting in memory corruption, denial of service, or potentially\\narbitrary code execution.\u003c/p\u003e\", \"base64\": false}]}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-121\", \"description\": \"CWE-121 Stack-based buffer overflow\"}]}], \"cpeApplicability\": [{\"nodes\": [{\"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:geovision_inc.:gv-lpclpc2011_2211:1.12:*:linux:*:*:*:*:*\", \"vulnerable\": true}, {\"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:geovision_inc.:gv-lpclpc2011_2211:1.13:*:linux:*:*:*:*:*\", \"vulnerable\": false}], \"operator\": \"OR\"}], \"operator\": \"OR\"}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"0df08a0e-a200-4957-9bb0-084f562506f9\", \"shortName\": \"GV\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-06-26T07:17:34.761Z\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-57879\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-06-26T15:57:42.515Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-06-26T02:40:42.398Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"0df08a0e-a200-4957-9bb0-084f562506f9\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-06-26T07:17:34.761Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"GV\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.2"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…