CVE-2026-57879 (GCVE-0-2026-57879)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-06-26 07:17 – Updated: 2026-06-26 15:57
VLAI
Title
GV-LPC2011/LPC2211 - unauthorized buffer overflow via AuthMode/AuthValue path (ssvr)
Summary
An unauthenticated
stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in ssvr in GeoVision
GV-LPC2011 and GV-LPC2211 V1.12 and earlier. The vulnerability is caused by
insufficient bounds checking when processing RTSP custom authentication data. A
remote attacker may exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted RTSP
request, resulting in memory corruption, denial of service, or potentially
arbitrary code execution.
Severity
9.8 (Critical)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-121 - Stack-based buffer overflow
Assigner
References
1 reference
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GeoVision Inc. | GV-LPCLPC2011/2211 |
Affected:
1.12
Unaffected: 1.13 |
Date Public
2026-06-26 02:55
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-57879",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-06-26T15:55:55.481404Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-26T15:57:42.515Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"platforms": [
"Linux"
],
"product": "GV-LPCLPC2011/2211",
"vendor": "GeoVision Inc.",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.12"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "1.13"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:geovision_inc.:gv-lpclpc2011_2211:1.12:*:linux:*:*:*:*:*",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:geovision_inc.:gv-lpclpc2011_2211:1.13:*:linux:*:*:*:*:*",
"vulnerable": false
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Jincheng Wang (@winmt), Professor Le Yu of Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, and Professor Xiapu Luo of The Hong Kong Polytechnic University has reported:"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-06-26T02:55:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eAn unauthenticated\nstack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in ssvr in GeoVision\nGV-LPC2011 and GV-LPC2211 V1.12 and earlier. The vulnerability is caused by\ninsufficient bounds checking when processing RTSP custom authentication data. A\nremote attacker may exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted RTSP\nrequest, resulting in memory corruption, denial of service, or potentially\narbitrary code execution.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "An unauthenticated\nstack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in ssvr in GeoVision\nGV-LPC2011 and GV-LPC2211 V1.12 and earlier. The vulnerability is caused by\ninsufficient bounds checking when processing RTSP custom authentication data. A\nremote attacker may exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted RTSP\nrequest, resulting in memory corruption, denial of service, or potentially\narbitrary code execution."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-100",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-100 Overflow Buffers"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.8,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-121",
"description": "CWE-121 Stack-based buffer overflow",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-26T07:17:34.761Z",
"orgId": "0df08a0e-a200-4957-9bb0-084f562506f9",
"shortName": "GV"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.geovision.com.tw/cyber_security.php"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-06-17T07:08:00.000Z",
"value": "Finder reports vulnerability to vendor"
}
],
"title": "GV-LPC2011/LPC2211 - unauthorized buffer overflow via AuthMode/AuthValue path (ssvr)",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.2"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "0df08a0e-a200-4957-9bb0-084f562506f9",
"assignerShortName": "GV",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-57879",
"datePublished": "2026-06-26T07:17:34.761Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-06-26T02:40:42.398Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-26T15:57:42.515Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-57879",
"date": "2026-06-26",
"epss": "0.0053",
"percentile": "0.40734"
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-57879\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"yes\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"total\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-06-26T15:55:55.481404Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-06-26T15:57:35.610Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"GV-LPC2011/LPC2211 - unauthorized buffer overflow via AuthMode/AuthValue path (ssvr)\", \"source\": {\"discovery\": \"EXTERNAL\"}, \"credits\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"finder\", \"value\": \"Jincheng Wang (@winmt), Professor Le Yu of Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, and Professor Xiapu Luo of The Hong Kong Polytechnic University has reported:\"}], \"impacts\": [{\"capecId\": \"CAPEC-100\", \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CAPEC-100 Overflow Buffers\"}]}], \"metrics\": [{\"format\": \"CVSS\", \"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 9.8, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"CRITICAL\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}, \"scenarios\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"GENERAL\"}]}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"GeoVision Inc.\", \"product\": \"GV-LPCLPC2011/2211\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"1.12\"}, {\"status\": \"unaffected\", \"version\": \"1.13\"}], \"platforms\": [\"Linux\"], \"defaultStatus\": \"unaffected\"}], \"timeline\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"time\": \"2026-06-17T07:08:00.000Z\", \"value\": \"Finder reports vulnerability to vendor\"}], \"datePublic\": \"2026-06-26T02:55:00.000Z\", \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://www.geovision.com.tw/cyber_security.php\"}], \"x_generator\": {\"engine\": \"Vulnogram 1.0.2\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"An unauthenticated\\nstack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in ssvr in GeoVision\\nGV-LPC2011 and GV-LPC2211 V1.12 and earlier. The vulnerability is caused by\\ninsufficient bounds checking when processing RTSP custom authentication data. A\\nremote attacker may exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted RTSP\\nrequest, resulting in memory corruption, denial of service, or potentially\\narbitrary code execution.\", \"supportingMedia\": [{\"type\": \"text/html\", \"value\": \"\u003cp\u003eAn unauthenticated\\nstack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in ssvr in GeoVision\\nGV-LPC2011 and GV-LPC2211 V1.12 and earlier. The vulnerability is caused by\\ninsufficient bounds checking when processing RTSP custom authentication data. A\\nremote attacker may exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted RTSP\\nrequest, resulting in memory corruption, denial of service, or potentially\\narbitrary code execution.\u003c/p\u003e\", \"base64\": false}]}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-121\", \"description\": \"CWE-121 Stack-based buffer overflow\"}]}], \"cpeApplicability\": [{\"nodes\": [{\"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:geovision_inc.:gv-lpclpc2011_2211:1.12:*:linux:*:*:*:*:*\", \"vulnerable\": true}, {\"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:geovision_inc.:gv-lpclpc2011_2211:1.13:*:linux:*:*:*:*:*\", \"vulnerable\": false}], \"operator\": \"OR\"}], \"operator\": \"OR\"}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"0df08a0e-a200-4957-9bb0-084f562506f9\", \"shortName\": \"GV\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-06-26T07:17:34.761Z\"}}}",
"cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-57879\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-06-26T15:57:42.515Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-06-26T02:40:42.398Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"0df08a0e-a200-4957-9bb0-084f562506f9\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-06-26T07:17:34.761Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"GV\"}",
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…