CVE-2026-57881 (GCVE-0-2026-57881)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-06-26 07:17 – Updated: 2026-06-26 16:08
VLAI
Title
GV-LPC2011/LPC2211 - unauthorized stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability (vlsvr)
Summary
An unauthenticated
stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in vlsvr in GeoVision
GV-LPC2011 and GV-LPC2211 V1.12 and earlier. The vulnerability is caused by
insufficient length validation when processing remote login data. A remote
attacker may exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted login data with
overly long input, resulting in memory corruption, denial of service, or potentially
arbitrary code execution.
Severity
9.8 (Critical)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-121 - Stack-based buffer overflow
Assigner
References
1 reference
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GeoVision Inc. | GV-LPCLPC2011/2211 |
Affected:
1.12
Unaffected: 1.13 |
Date Public
2026-06-26 02:55
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-57881",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-06-26T16:06:52.117443Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-26T16:08:37.099Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"platforms": [
"Linux"
],
"product": "GV-LPCLPC2011/2211",
"vendor": "GeoVision Inc.",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.12"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "1.13"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:geovision_inc.:gv-lpclpc2011_2211:1.12:*:linux:*:*:*:*:*",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:geovision_inc.:gv-lpclpc2011_2211:1.13:*:linux:*:*:*:*:*",
"vulnerable": false
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Jincheng Wang (@winmt), Professor Le Yu of Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, and Professor Xiapu Luo of The Hong Kong Polytechnic University has reported:"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-06-26T02:55:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eAn unauthenticated\nstack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in vlsvr in GeoVision\nGV-LPC2011 and GV-LPC2211 V1.12 and earlier. The vulnerability is caused by\ninsufficient length validation when processing remote login data. A remote\nattacker may exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted login data with\noverly long input, resulting in memory corruption, denial of service, or potentially\narbitrary code execution.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "An unauthenticated\nstack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in vlsvr in GeoVision\nGV-LPC2011 and GV-LPC2211 V1.12 and earlier. The vulnerability is caused by\ninsufficient length validation when processing remote login data. A remote\nattacker may exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted login data with\noverly long input, resulting in memory corruption, denial of service, or potentially\narbitrary code execution."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-100",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-100 Overflow Buffers"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.8,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-121",
"description": "CWE-121 Stack-based buffer overflow",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-26T07:17:45.825Z",
"orgId": "0df08a0e-a200-4957-9bb0-084f562506f9",
"shortName": "GV"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.geovision.com.tw/cyber_security.php"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-06-17T07:08:00.000Z",
"value": "Finder reports vulnerability to vendor"
}
],
"title": "GV-LPC2011/LPC2211 - unauthorized stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability (vlsvr)",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.2"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "0df08a0e-a200-4957-9bb0-084f562506f9",
"assignerShortName": "GV",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-57881",
"datePublished": "2026-06-26T07:17:45.825Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-06-26T02:40:42.398Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-26T16:08:37.099Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-57881",
"date": "2026-06-26",
"epss": "0.00376",
"percentile": "0.29436"
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-57881\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"yes\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-06-26T16:06:52.117443Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-06-26T16:07:16.644Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"GV-LPC2011/LPC2211 - unauthorized stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability (vlsvr)\", \"source\": {\"discovery\": \"EXTERNAL\"}, \"credits\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"finder\", \"value\": \"Jincheng Wang (@winmt), Professor Le Yu of Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, and Professor Xiapu Luo of The Hong Kong Polytechnic University has reported:\"}], \"impacts\": [{\"capecId\": \"CAPEC-100\", \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CAPEC-100 Overflow Buffers\"}]}], \"metrics\": [{\"format\": \"CVSS\", \"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 9.8, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"CRITICAL\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}, \"scenarios\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"GENERAL\"}]}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"GeoVision Inc.\", \"product\": \"GV-LPCLPC2011/2211\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"1.12\"}, {\"status\": \"unaffected\", \"version\": \"1.13\"}], \"platforms\": [\"Linux\"], \"defaultStatus\": \"unaffected\"}], \"timeline\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"time\": \"2026-06-17T07:08:00.000Z\", \"value\": \"Finder reports vulnerability to vendor\"}], \"datePublic\": \"2026-06-26T02:55:00.000Z\", \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://www.geovision.com.tw/cyber_security.php\"}], \"x_generator\": {\"engine\": \"Vulnogram 1.0.2\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"An unauthenticated\\nstack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in vlsvr in GeoVision\\nGV-LPC2011 and GV-LPC2211 V1.12 and earlier. The vulnerability is caused by\\ninsufficient length validation when processing remote login data. A remote\\nattacker may exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted login data with\\noverly long input, resulting in memory corruption, denial of service, or potentially\\narbitrary code execution.\", \"supportingMedia\": [{\"type\": \"text/html\", \"value\": \"\u003cp\u003eAn unauthenticated\\nstack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in vlsvr in GeoVision\\nGV-LPC2011 and GV-LPC2211 V1.12 and earlier. The vulnerability is caused by\\ninsufficient length validation when processing remote login data. A remote\\nattacker may exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted login data with\\noverly long input, resulting in memory corruption, denial of service, or potentially\\narbitrary code execution.\u003c/p\u003e\", \"base64\": false}]}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-121\", \"description\": \"CWE-121 Stack-based buffer overflow\"}]}], \"cpeApplicability\": [{\"nodes\": [{\"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:geovision_inc.:gv-lpclpc2011_2211:1.12:*:linux:*:*:*:*:*\", \"vulnerable\": true}, {\"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:geovision_inc.:gv-lpclpc2011_2211:1.13:*:linux:*:*:*:*:*\", \"vulnerable\": false}], \"operator\": \"OR\"}], \"operator\": \"OR\"}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"0df08a0e-a200-4957-9bb0-084f562506f9\", \"shortName\": \"GV\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-06-26T07:17:45.825Z\"}}}",
"cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-57881\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-06-26T16:08:37.099Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-06-26T02:40:42.398Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"0df08a0e-a200-4957-9bb0-084f562506f9\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-06-26T07:17:45.825Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"GV\"}",
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…