CVE-2026-59074 (GCVE-0-2026-59074)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-11-13 07:26 – Updated: 2026-11-13 07:26
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Improper Cryptographic Signature Verification in Edito CMS
Summary
Edito CMS is vulnerable to improper cryptographic signature verification in the JWT refresh logic. An authenticated low-privilege user can submit self-crafted JWT containing an existing user identifier and, due to the lack of signature validation, obtain a valid, fully-signed session token for any account in the system. This allows the attacker to impersonate any user, including administrators.
This issue was fixed in version 5.10.2607. Hotfixes for older versions (5.8) have also been released.
Severity
CWE
- CWE-347 - Improper verification of cryptographic signature
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://cert.pl/posts/2026/11/CVE-2026-59074 | third-party-advisory |
| https://www.edito.pl/ | product |
Impacted products
Date Public
2026-11-12 09:54
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Edito CMS",
"vendor": "Edito",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "5.10.2607",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Micha\u0142 Majchrowicz (AFINE Team)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Dawid Ma\u0142ecki (AFINE Team)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "\u200bPawe\u0142 Zdunek (AFINE Team)"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-11-12T09:54:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Edito CMS is vulnerable to improper cryptographic signature verification in the JWT refresh logic. An authenticated low-privilege user can submit self-crafted\u200b \u200bJWT\u200b containing\u200b \u200ban existing user\u200b \u200bidentifier and, due to the lack of signature validation,\u200b\u200b\u0026nbsp; obtain\u200b \u200ba \u200b\u200bvalid,\u200b\u200b fully-signed\u200b\u200b session \u200b\u200btoken\u200b\u200b for\u200b\u200b any \u200b\u200baccount \u200b\u200bin\u200b \u200bthe\u200b \u200bsystem. This allows the attacker to\u0026nbsp;impersonate any user, including administrators.\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cdiv\u003eThis issue was fixed in version 5.10.2607.\u0026nbsp; Hotfixes for older versions (5.8)\u0026nbsp;have also been released.\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Edito CMS is vulnerable to improper cryptographic signature verification in the JWT refresh logic. An authenticated low-privilege user can submit self-crafted\u200b \u200bJWT\u200b containing\u200b \u200ban existing user\u200b \u200bidentifier and, due to the lack of signature validation,\u200b\u200b\u00a0 obtain\u200b \u200ba \u200b\u200bvalid,\u200b\u200b fully-signed\u200b\u200b session \u200b\u200btoken\u200b\u200b for\u200b\u200b any \u200b\u200baccount \u200b\u200bin\u200b \u200bthe\u200b \u200bsystem. This allows the attacker to\u00a0impersonate any user, including administrators.\nThis issue was fixed in version 5.10.2607.\u00a0 Hotfixes for older versions (5.8)\u00a0have also been released."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-21",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-21 Exploitation of Trusted Identifiers"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-347",
"description": "CWE-347 Improper verification of cryptographic signature",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-13T07:26:21.814Z",
"orgId": "4bb8329e-dd38-46c1-aafb-9bf32bcb93c6",
"shortName": "CERT-PL"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://cert.pl/posts/2026/11/CVE-2026-59074"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://www.edito.pl/"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Improper Cryptographic Signature Verification in Edito CMS",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.3"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "4bb8329e-dd38-46c1-aafb-9bf32bcb93c6",
"assignerShortName": "CERT-PL",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-59074",
"datePublished": "2026-11-13T07:26:21.814Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-07-02T08:57:58.309Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-11-13T07:26:21.814Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-59074",
"date": "2026-11-13",
"epss": "0.00186",
"percentile": "0.08288"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Edito CMS",
"vendor": "Edito",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "5.10.2607",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"source": "cvd@cert.pl"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Edito CMS is vulnerable to improper cryptographic signature verification in the JWT refresh logic. An authenticated low-privilege user can submit self-crafted\u200b \u200bJWT\u200b containing\u200b \u200ban existing user\u200b \u200bidentifier and, due to the lack of signature validation,\u200b\u200b\u00a0 obtain\u200b \u200ba \u200b\u200bvalid,\u200b\u200b fully-signed\u200b\u200b session \u200b\u200btoken\u200b\u200b for\u200b\u200b any \u200b\u200baccount \u200b\u200bin\u200b \u200bthe\u200b \u200bsystem. This allows the attacker to\u00a0impersonate any user, including administrators.\nThis issue was fixed in version 5.10.2607.\u00a0 Hotfixes for older versions (5.8)\u00a0have also been released."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-59074",
"lastModified": "2026-11-13T08:17:17.347",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV40": [
{
"cvssData": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"baseScore": 8.7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"integrityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackComplexity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackRequirements": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackVector": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedPrivilegesRequired": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedUserInteraction": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"source": "cvd@cert.pl",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
},
"published": "2026-11-13T08:17:17.347",
"references": [
{
"source": "cvd@cert.pl",
"url": "https://cert.pl/posts/2026/11/CVE-2026-59074"
},
{
"source": "cvd@cert.pl",
"url": "https://www.edito.pl/"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "cvd@cert.pl",
"vulnStatus": "Received",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-347"
}
],
"source": "cvd@cert.pl",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.