CVE-2026-63571 (GCVE-0-2026-63571)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-02 07:04 – Updated: 2026-10-02 07:04
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Attribute certificate path validation does not verify the attribute certificate's signature
Summary
Improper verification of cryptographic signature in the attribute certificate path validator (PkixAttrCertPathValidator, also used by PkixAttrCertPathBuilder) in Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. bc-csharp before 2.7.0 allows a remote attacker to have a forged X.509 attribute certificate accepted as valid, and so obtain whatever roles or privileges an application grants on the strength of its attributes, via an attribute certificate that names a trusted attribute authority as its issuer but was not signed by it, because the RFC 3281 validation steps check the holder and issuer certification paths, validity period, extensions and revocation status but never verify the attribute certificate's signature with the issuer's public key. Only applications that use these classes to validate attribute certificates are affected.
Severity
CWE
- CWE-347 - Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/bcgit/bc-csharp/wiki/CVE-2026-63571 | vendor-advisory |
| https://github.com/bcgit/bc-csharp/commit/c08f65e… | patch |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. | bc-csharp |
Affected:
0 , < 2.7.0
(semver)
|
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://www.nuget.org/packages/BouncyCastle.Cryptography",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "BouncyCastle.Cryptography",
"product": "bc-csharp",
"programFiles": [
"crypto/src/pkix/PkixAttrCertPathValidator.cs",
"crypto/src/pkix/Rfc3281CertPathUtilities.cs"
],
"repo": "https://github.com/bcgit/bc-csharp",
"vendor": "Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc.",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2.7.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Discovered by Claude, Anthropic\u0027s AI assistant, and triaged by the Anthropic security team in collaboration with Anthropic Research."
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Improper verification of cryptographic signature in the attribute certificate path validator (PkixAttrCertPathValidator, also used by PkixAttrCertPathBuilder) in Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. bc-csharp before 2.7.0 allows a remote attacker to have a forged X.509 attribute certificate accepted as valid, and so obtain whatever roles or privileges an application grants on the strength of its attributes, via an attribute certificate that names a trusted attribute authority as its issuer but was not signed by it, because the RFC 3281 validation steps check the holder and issuer certification paths, validity period, extensions and revocation status but never verify the attribute certificate\u0027s signature with the issuer\u0027s public key. Only applications that use these classes to validate attribute certificates are affected."
}
],
"value": "Improper verification of cryptographic signature in the attribute certificate path validator (PkixAttrCertPathValidator, also used by PkixAttrCertPathBuilder) in Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. bc-csharp before 2.7.0 allows a remote attacker to have a forged X.509 attribute certificate accepted as valid, and so obtain whatever roles or privileges an application grants on the strength of its attributes, via an attribute certificate that names a trusted attribute authority as its issuer but was not signed by it, because the RFC 3281 validation steps check the holder and issuer certification paths, validity period, extensions and revocation status but never verify the attribute certificate\u0027s signature with the issuer\u0027s public key. Only applications that use these classes to validate attribute certificates are affected."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Authorization bypass (forged attribute certificate accepted as valid)"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-347",
"description": "CWE-347 Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-02T07:04:17.323Z",
"orgId": "91579145-5d7b-4cc5-b925-a0262ff19630",
"shortName": "bcorg"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/bcgit/bc-csharp/wiki/CVE-2026-63571"
},
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/bcgit/bc-csharp/commit/c08f65e1ed7b92a10776220ed9c047f47c264725"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Attribute certificate path validation does not verify the attribute certificate\u0027s signature",
"x_antReportIds": [
"ANT-2026-2T9GVTAC"
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Claude Opus 5.5"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "91579145-5d7b-4cc5-b925-a0262ff19630",
"assignerShortName": "bcorg",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-63571",
"datePublished": "2026-10-02T07:04:17.323Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-07-16T23:50:45.118Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-02T07:04:17.323Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-63571",
"date": "2026-10-02",
"epss": "0.00169",
"percentile": "0.05619"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://www.nuget.org/packages/BouncyCastle.Cryptography",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "BouncyCastle.Cryptography",
"product": "bc-csharp",
"programFiles": [
"crypto/src/pkix/PkixAttrCertPathValidator.cs",
"crypto/src/pkix/Rfc3281CertPathUtilities.cs"
],
"repo": "https://github.com/bcgit/bc-csharp",
"vendor": "Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc.",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2.7.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"source": "91579145-5d7b-4cc5-b925-a0262ff19630"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Improper verification of cryptographic signature in the attribute certificate path validator (PkixAttrCertPathValidator, also used by PkixAttrCertPathBuilder) in Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. bc-csharp before 2.7.0 allows a remote attacker to have a forged X.509 attribute certificate accepted as valid, and so obtain whatever roles or privileges an application grants on the strength of its attributes, via an attribute certificate that names a trusted attribute authority as its issuer but was not signed by it, because the RFC 3281 validation steps check the holder and issuer certification paths, validity period, extensions and revocation status but never verify the attribute certificate\u0027s signature with the issuer\u0027s public key. Only applications that use these classes to validate attribute certificates are affected."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-63571",
"lastModified": "2026-10-02T14:44:52.247",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV40": [
{
"cvssData": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"baseScore": 8.7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"integrityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackComplexity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackRequirements": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackVector": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedPrivilegesRequired": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedUserInteraction": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"source": "91579145-5d7b-4cc5-b925-a0262ff19630",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
},
"published": "2026-10-02T08:17:01.993",
"references": [
{
"source": "91579145-5d7b-4cc5-b925-a0262ff19630",
"url": "https://github.com/bcgit/bc-csharp/commit/c08f65e1ed7b92a10776220ed9c047f47c264725"
},
{
"source": "91579145-5d7b-4cc5-b925-a0262ff19630",
"url": "https://github.com/bcgit/bc-csharp/wiki/CVE-2026-63571"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "91579145-5d7b-4cc5-b925-a0262ff19630",
"vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-347"
}
],
"source": "91579145-5d7b-4cc5-b925-a0262ff19630",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.
Loading…