CVE-2026-82311 (GCVE-0-2026-82311)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-16 09:00 – Updated: 2026-09-17 19:27
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Apache Airflow FAB provider: FAB password reset never invalidates sessions: string/int _user_id comparison is always false
Summary
Apache Airflow FAB provider: resetting a user's password does not delete that user's existing database-backed sessions, despite documented behaviour that it does. The cleanup compares the string identifier Flask-Login stores in the session against the user's integer database identifier, so the comparison never matches and no session is removed. An attacker who already holds a copy of the victim's session cookie keeps access as that user after the password change, so the reset does not evict them.
Affects deployments using the FAB auth manager with `[fab] session_backend=database`. The trigger is an administrator (or the user) running the supported password-reset command as a containment action after a session cookie has been compromised; the secure-cookie backend is out of scope, as it documents that it cannot centrally delete sessions.
apache-airflow-providers-fab 3.9.0 also fixes CVE-2026-86462, a second, independent route to the same outcome via the Admin user-edit endpoint; a single upgrade closes both.
Users of apache-airflow-providers-fab are recommended to upgrade to version 3.9.0 or later, which compares the identifiers consistently.
Severity
9.8 (Critical)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-09-17 19:26 UTC
CWE
- CWE-613 - Insufficient Session Expiration
Assigner
References
4 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/72198 | patch |
| https://lists.apache.org/thread/mmplwl93shy615shk… | vendor-advisory |
| https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-86462 | related |
| https://lists.apache.org/thread/mmplwl93shy615shk… | vendor-advisory |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apache Software Foundation | Apache Airflow FAB provider |
Affected:
2.4.2 , < 3.9.0
(semver)
|
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.8,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-82311",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-17T19:26:29.021619Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-17T19:27:29.873Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://pypi.python.org",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "apache-airflow-providers-fab",
"packageURL": "pkg:pypi/apache-airflow-providers-fab",
"product": "Apache Airflow FAB provider",
"vendor": "Apache Software Foundation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.9.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.4.2",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Mayank Jangid (OpenSec)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Jarek Potiuk"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Apache Airflow FAB provider: resetting a user\u0026#x27;s password does not delete that user\u0026#x27;s existing database-backed sessions, despite documented behaviour that it does. The cleanup compares the string identifier Flask-Login stores in the session against the user\u0026#x27;s integer database identifier, so the comparison never matches and no session is removed. An attacker who already holds a copy of the victim\u0026#x27;s session cookie keeps access as that user after the password change, so the reset does not evict them.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eAffects deployments using the FAB auth manager with `[fab] session_backend=database`. The trigger is an administrator (or the user) running the supported password-reset command as a containment action after a session cookie has been compromised; the secure-cookie backend is out of scope, as it documents that it cannot centrally delete sessions.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eapache-airflow-providers-fab 3.9.0 also fixes CVE-2026-86462, a second, independent route to the same outcome via the Admin user-edit endpoint; a single upgrade closes both.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eUsers of apache-airflow-providers-fab are recommended to upgrade to version 3.9.0 or later, which compares the identifiers consistently."
}
],
"value": "Apache Airflow FAB provider: resetting a user\u0027s password does not delete that user\u0027s existing database-backed sessions, despite documented behaviour that it does. The cleanup compares the string identifier Flask-Login stores in the session against the user\u0027s integer database identifier, so the comparison never matches and no session is removed. An attacker who already holds a copy of the victim\u0027s session cookie keeps access as that user after the password change, so the reset does not evict them.\n\nAffects deployments using the FAB auth manager with `[fab] session_backend=database`. The trigger is an administrator (or the user) running the supported password-reset command as a containment action after a session cookie has been compromised; the secure-cookie backend is out of scope, as it documents that it cannot centrally delete sessions.\n\napache-airflow-providers-fab 3.9.0 also fixes CVE-2026-86462, a second, independent route to the same outcome via the Admin user-edit endpoint; a single upgrade closes both.\n\nUsers of apache-airflow-providers-fab are recommended to upgrade to version 3.9.0 or later, which compares the identifiers consistently."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"text": "moderate"
},
"type": "Textual description of severity"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-613",
"description": "CWE-613: Insufficient Session Expiration",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-16T14:54:52.025Z",
"orgId": "f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09",
"shortName": "apache"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/72198"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/mmplwl93shy615shkpp9p4fzyjvr4yqw?users@airflow.apache.org"
},
{
"tags": [
"related"
],
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-86462"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/mmplwl93shy615shkpp9p4fzyjvr4yqw"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Apache Airflow FAB provider: FAB password reset never invalidates sessions: string/int _user_id comparison is always false",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "airflow-s/generate_cve_json.py"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09",
"assignerShortName": "apache",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-82311",
"datePublished": "2026-09-16T09:00:38.459Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-28T12:58:33.571Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-17T19:27:29.873Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-82311",
"date": "2026-10-19",
"epss": "0.00977",
"percentile": "0.61539"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://pypi.python.org",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "apache-airflow-providers-fab",
"packageURL": "pkg:pypi/apache-airflow-providers-fab",
"product": "Apache Airflow FAB provider",
"vendor": "Apache Software Foundation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.9.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.4.2",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"source": "security@apache.org"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:apache:apache-airflow-providers-fab:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "4472D53A-4461-4F51-970A-C62B4F449722",
"versionEndExcluding": "3.9.0",
"versionStartIncluding": "2.4.2",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Apache Airflow FAB provider: resetting a user\u0027s password does not delete that user\u0027s existing database-backed sessions, despite documented behaviour that it does. The cleanup compares the string identifier Flask-Login stores in the session against the user\u0027s integer database identifier, so the comparison never matches and no session is removed. An attacker who already holds a copy of the victim\u0027s session cookie keeps access as that user after the password change, so the reset does not evict them.\n\nAffects deployments using the FAB auth manager with `[fab] session_backend=database`. The trigger is an administrator (or the user) running the supported password-reset command as a containment action after a session cookie has been compromised; the secure-cookie backend is out of scope, as it documents that it cannot centrally delete sessions.\n\napache-airflow-providers-fab 3.9.0 also fixes CVE-2026-86462, a second, independent route to the same outcome via the Admin user-edit endpoint; a single upgrade closes both.\n\nUsers of apache-airflow-providers-fab are recommended to upgrade to version 3.9.0 or later, which compares the identifiers consistently."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-82311",
"lastModified": "2026-09-18T14:28:43.283",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.8,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2026-82311",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "yes"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-17T19:26:29.021619Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2026-09-16T09:17:06.430",
"references": [
{
"source": "security@apache.org",
"tags": [
"Patch",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/72198"
},
{
"source": "security@apache.org",
"tags": [
"Mailing List",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/mmplwl93shy615shkpp9p4fzyjvr4yqw"
},
{
"source": "security@apache.org",
"tags": [
"Mailing List"
],
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/mmplwl93shy615shkpp9p4fzyjvr4yqw?users@airflow.apache.org"
},
{
"source": "security@apache.org",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-86462"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security@apache.org",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-613"
}
],
"source": "security@apache.org",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.8,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-82311",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-17T19:26:29.021619Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-17T19:27:23.895Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://pypi.python.org",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "apache-airflow-providers-fab",
"packageURL": "pkg:pypi/apache-airflow-providers-fab",
"product": "Apache Airflow FAB provider",
"vendor": "Apache Software Foundation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.9.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.4.2",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Mayank Jangid (OpenSec)"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Jarek Potiuk"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Apache Airflow FAB provider: resetting a user\u0026#x27;s password does not delete that user\u0026#x27;s existing database-backed sessions, despite documented behaviour that it does. The cleanup compares the string identifier Flask-Login stores in the session against the user\u0026#x27;s integer database identifier, so the comparison never matches and no session is removed. An attacker who already holds a copy of the victim\u0026#x27;s session cookie keeps access as that user after the password change, so the reset does not evict them.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eAffects deployments using the FAB auth manager with `[fab] session_backend=database`. The trigger is an administrator (or the user) running the supported password-reset command as a containment action after a session cookie has been compromised; the secure-cookie backend is out of scope, as it documents that it cannot centrally delete sessions.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eapache-airflow-providers-fab 3.9.0 also fixes CVE-2026-86462, a second, independent route to the same outcome via the Admin user-edit endpoint; a single upgrade closes both.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eUsers of apache-airflow-providers-fab are recommended to upgrade to version 3.9.0 or later, which compares the identifiers consistently."
}
],
"value": "Apache Airflow FAB provider: resetting a user\u0027s password does not delete that user\u0027s existing database-backed sessions, despite documented behaviour that it does. The cleanup compares the string identifier Flask-Login stores in the session against the user\u0027s integer database identifier, so the comparison never matches and no session is removed. An attacker who already holds a copy of the victim\u0027s session cookie keeps access as that user after the password change, so the reset does not evict them.\n\nAffects deployments using the FAB auth manager with `[fab] session_backend=database`. The trigger is an administrator (or the user) running the supported password-reset command as a containment action after a session cookie has been compromised; the secure-cookie backend is out of scope, as it documents that it cannot centrally delete sessions.\n\napache-airflow-providers-fab 3.9.0 also fixes CVE-2026-86462, a second, independent route to the same outcome via the Admin user-edit endpoint; a single upgrade closes both.\n\nUsers of apache-airflow-providers-fab are recommended to upgrade to version 3.9.0 or later, which compares the identifiers consistently."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"text": "moderate"
},
"type": "Textual description of severity"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-613",
"description": "CWE-613: Insufficient Session Expiration",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-16T14:54:52.025Z",
"orgId": "f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09",
"shortName": "apache"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/72198"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/mmplwl93shy615shkpp9p4fzyjvr4yqw?users@airflow.apache.org"
},
{
"tags": [
"related"
],
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-86462"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/mmplwl93shy615shkpp9p4fzyjvr4yqw"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Apache Airflow FAB provider: FAB password reset never invalidates sessions: string/int _user_id comparison is always false",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "airflow-s/generate_cve_json.py"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09",
"assignerShortName": "apache",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-82311",
"datePublished": "2026-09-16T09:00:38.459Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-28T12:58:33.571Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-16T14:54:52.025Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.