CVE-2026-82944 (GCVE-0-2026-82944)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-26 08:47 – Updated: 2026-10-26 08:47
VLAI
Title
Buffer Overflow in CoE SDO Upload Multi-Segment Data Transfers
Summary
SOEM version 2.0.0 and earlier contains a vulnerability in multi-segment data transfers where a malicious device can overflow memory buffers. The software checks the total size only once at the beginning, but doesn't track the cumulative size as multiple segments arrive. An attacker can declare a small initial size to pass validation, then send additional segments that exceed the allocated buffer. This allows the attacker to write controlled data beyond buffer boundaries, potentially enabling code execution.
CWE
  • CWE-787 - Out-of-bounds write
  • CWE-131 - Incorrect calculation of buffer size
  • CWE-120 - Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input (‘Classic Buffer Overflow’)
Assigner
ENISA CNA under the ENISA root
CNA scorecard B 79/100 over 48 records in the last 180 days details
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version CPE status
RT-Labs AB SOEM Affected: 0 , < 2.0.1 (semver)
guessed Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "SOEM",
          "vendor": "RT-Labs AB",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "2.0.1",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "3ntr0py1337 / LeetProtect Research, Akhil Koul, Mayur Agnihotri"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "SOEM version 2.0.0 and earlier contains a vulnerability in multi-segment data transfers where a malicious device can overflow memory buffers. The software checks the total size only once at the beginning, but doesn\u0027t track the cumulative size as multiple segments arrive. An attacker can declare a small initial size to pass validation, then send additional segments that exceed the allocated buffer. This allows the attacker to write controlled data beyond buffer boundaries, potentially enabling code execution."
            }
          ],
          "value": "SOEM version 2.0.0 and earlier contains a vulnerability in multi-segment data transfers where a malicious device can overflow memory buffers. The software checks the total size only once at the beginning, but doesn\u0027t track the cumulative size as multiple segments arrive. An attacker can declare a small initial size to pass validation, then send additional segments that exceed the allocated buffer. This allows the attacker to write controlled data beyond buffer boundaries, potentially enabling code execution."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "baseScore": 8.8,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-787",
              "description": "CWE-787 Out-of-bounds write",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-131",
              "description": "CWE-131 Incorrect calculation of buffer size",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-120",
              "description": "CWE-120 Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input (\u2018Classic Buffer Overflow\u2019)",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-10-26T08:47:50.412Z",
        "orgId": "a6d3dc9e-0591-4a13-bce7-0f5b31ff6158",
        "shortName": "ENISA"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://rt-labs.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/RRTL-260921-01.pdf"
        }
      ],
      "title": "Buffer Overflow in CoE SDO Upload Multi-Segment Data Transfers",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.5"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "a6d3dc9e-0591-4a13-bce7-0f5b31ff6158",
    "assignerShortName": "ENISA",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-82944",
    "datePublished": "2026-10-26T08:47:50.412Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-08-31T12:26:22.054Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-10-26T08:47:50.412Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "nvd": {
      "cve": {
        "affected": [
          {
            "affectedData": [
              {
                "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
                "product": "SOEM",
                "vendor": "RT-Labs AB",
                "versions": [
                  {
                    "lessThan": "2.0.1",
                    "status": "affected",
                    "version": "0",
                    "versionType": "semver"
                  }
                ]
              }
            ],
            "source": "a6d3dc9e-0591-4a13-bce7-0f5b31ff6158"
          }
        ],
        "cveTags": [],
        "descriptions": [
          {
            "lang": "en",
            "value": "SOEM version 2.0.0 and earlier contains a vulnerability in multi-segment data transfers where a malicious device can overflow memory buffers. The software checks the total size only once at the beginning, but doesn\u0027t track the cumulative size as multiple segments arrive. An attacker can declare a small initial size to pass validation, then send additional segments that exceed the allocated buffer. This allows the attacker to write controlled data beyond buffer boundaries, potentially enabling code execution."
          }
        ],
        "id": "CVE-2026-82944",
        "lastModified": "2026-10-26T09:16:36.140",
        "metrics": {
          "cvssMetricV31": [
            {
              "cvssData": {
                "attackComplexity": "LOW",
                "attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK",
                "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
                "baseScore": 8.8,
                "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
                "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
                "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
                "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
                "scope": "UNCHANGED",
                "userInteraction": "NONE",
                "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
                "version": "3.1"
              },
              "exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
              "impactScore": 5.9,
              "source": "a6d3dc9e-0591-4a13-bce7-0f5b31ff6158",
              "type": "Secondary"
            }
          ]
        },
        "published": "2026-10-26T09:16:36.140",
        "references": [
          {
            "source": "a6d3dc9e-0591-4a13-bce7-0f5b31ff6158",
            "url": "https://rt-labs.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/RRTL-260921-01.pdf"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIdentifier": "a6d3dc9e-0591-4a13-bce7-0f5b31ff6158",
        "vulnStatus": "Received",
        "weaknesses": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "en",
                "value": "CWE-120"
              },
              {
                "lang": "en",
                "value": "CWE-131"
              },
              {
                "lang": "en",
                "value": "CWE-787"
              }
            ],
            "source": "a6d3dc9e-0591-4a13-bce7-0f5b31ff6158",
            "type": "Secondary"
          }
        ]
      }
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.