CVE-2026-93853 (GCVE-0-2026-93853)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-29 20:55 – Updated: 2026-09-30 15:28- CWE-283 - Unverified Ownership
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EnterpriseDB | Barman |
Affected:
3.4.0 , < 3.20.1
(custom)
|
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-93853",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-30T15:04:52.773679Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-30T15:28:16.037Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://github.com/EnterpriseDB/barman",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Barman",
"vendor": "EnterpriseDB",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.20.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.4.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Mufeed VH of Winfunc"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Unverified ownership in Barman snapshot backup deletion allows a principal who can write the backup catalog to cause Barman to delete unrelated cloud snapshots. When a snapshot backup is deleted, either explicitly or by retention policy enforcement, Barman reads the snapshot identifiers from the backup.info file and passes them to the cloud provider\u0027s delete API using Barman\u0027s own credentials, without verifying that the snapshots belong to that backup. An attacker who can overwrite backup.info but lacks snapshot delete permissions can substitute the identifiers of other snapshots, causing Barman to delete any snapshot its cloud identity can reach on AWS, Microsoft Azure, or Google Cloud. Exploitation requires a deployment where the principal that writes the backup catalog is separate from the identity Barman uses to delete snapshots. Barman versions from 3.4.0 (Google Cloud), 3.6.0 (Azure), and 3.7.0 (AWS) up to and including 3.20.0 are affected. The issue is fixed in Barman 3.20.1."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"baseScore": 7.2,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H",
"version": "4.0"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-283",
"description": "CWE-283 Unverified Ownership",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-29T20:55:51.959Z",
"orgId": "20be33e2-bf35-4d13-8fad-18bd2f3e3659",
"shortName": "EDB"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.enterprisedb.com/docs/security/advisories/cve202693853/"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Upgrade to Barman 3.20.1 or later. Before deleting a snapshot, Barman now reads the snapshot name from the cloud provider and refuses the deletion unless it matches the backup being deleted."
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Barman snapshot backup deletion trusts unverified backup catalog metadata",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Restrict write access to the backup catalog in object storage to the identity Barman uses. Enable object versioning or object lock on the backup bucket, and on AWS use EBS Snapshot Lock (aws_snapshot_lock_mode) to protect snapshots from deletion."
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "20be33e2-bf35-4d13-8fad-18bd2f3e3659",
"assignerShortName": "EDB",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-93853",
"datePublished": "2026-09-29T20:55:51.959Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-09-18T18:52:15.463Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-30T15:28:16.037Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-93853",
"date": "2026-11-13",
"epss": "0.00207",
"percentile": "0.10932"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://github.com/EnterpriseDB/barman",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Barman",
"vendor": "EnterpriseDB",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.20.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.4.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"source": "20be33e2-bf35-4d13-8fad-18bd2f3e3659"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Unverified ownership in Barman snapshot backup deletion allows a principal who can write the backup catalog to cause Barman to delete unrelated cloud snapshots. When a snapshot backup is deleted, either explicitly or by retention policy enforcement, Barman reads the snapshot identifiers from the backup.info file and passes them to the cloud provider\u0027s delete API using Barman\u0027s own credentials, without verifying that the snapshots belong to that backup. An attacker who can overwrite backup.info but lacks snapshot delete permissions can substitute the identifiers of other snapshots, causing Barman to delete any snapshot its cloud identity can reach on AWS, Microsoft Azure, or Google Cloud. Exploitation requires a deployment where the principal that writes the backup catalog is separate from the identity Barman uses to delete snapshots. Barman versions from 3.4.0 (Google Cloud), 3.6.0 (Azure), and 3.7.0 (AWS) up to and including 3.20.0 are affected. The issue is fixed in Barman 3.20.1."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-93853",
"lastModified": "2026-09-30T19:57:08.043",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV40": [
{
"cvssData": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"baseScore": 7.2,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"integrityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackComplexity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackRequirements": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackVector": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedPrivilegesRequired": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedUserInteraction": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"source": "20be33e2-bf35-4d13-8fad-18bd2f3e3659",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2026-93853",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-30T15:04:52.773679Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2026-09-29T21:19:39.140",
"references": [
{
"source": "20be33e2-bf35-4d13-8fad-18bd2f3e3659",
"url": "https://www.enterprisedb.com/docs/security/advisories/cve202693853/"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "20be33e2-bf35-4d13-8fad-18bd2f3e3659",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-283"
}
],
"source": "20be33e2-bf35-4d13-8fad-18bd2f3e3659",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-93853",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-30T15:04:52.773679Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-30T15:26:07.297Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://github.com/EnterpriseDB/barman",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Barman",
"vendor": "EnterpriseDB",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.20.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.4.0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Mufeed VH of Winfunc"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Unverified ownership in Barman snapshot backup deletion allows a principal who can write the backup catalog to cause Barman to delete unrelated cloud snapshots. When a snapshot backup is deleted, either explicitly or by retention policy enforcement, Barman reads the snapshot identifiers from the backup.info file and passes them to the cloud provider\u0027s delete API using Barman\u0027s own credentials, without verifying that the snapshots belong to that backup. An attacker who can overwrite backup.info but lacks snapshot delete permissions can substitute the identifiers of other snapshots, causing Barman to delete any snapshot its cloud identity can reach on AWS, Microsoft Azure, or Google Cloud. Exploitation requires a deployment where the principal that writes the backup catalog is separate from the identity Barman uses to delete snapshots. Barman versions from 3.4.0 (Google Cloud), 3.6.0 (Azure), and 3.7.0 (AWS) up to and including 3.20.0 are affected. The issue is fixed in Barman 3.20.1."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"baseScore": 7.2,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H",
"version": "4.0"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-283",
"description": "CWE-283 Unverified Ownership",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-29T20:55:51.959Z",
"orgId": "20be33e2-bf35-4d13-8fad-18bd2f3e3659",
"shortName": "EDB"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.enterprisedb.com/docs/security/advisories/cve202693853/"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Upgrade to Barman 3.20.1 or later. Before deleting a snapshot, Barman now reads the snapshot name from the cloud provider and refuses the deletion unless it matches the backup being deleted."
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Barman snapshot backup deletion trusts unverified backup catalog metadata",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Restrict write access to the backup catalog in object storage to the identity Barman uses. Enable object versioning or object lock on the backup bucket, and on AWS use EBS Snapshot Lock (aws_snapshot_lock_mode) to protect snapshots from deletion."
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "20be33e2-bf35-4d13-8fad-18bd2f3e3659",
"assignerShortName": "EDB",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-93853",
"datePublished": "2026-09-29T20:55:51.959Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-09-18T18:52:15.463Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-29T20:55:51.959Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Solutions
Workarounds
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.