CVE-2026-94377 (GCVE-0-2026-94377)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-14 03:40 – Updated: 2026-10-14 17:52
VLAI
Title
Verified Reviews (Avis Vérifiés) <= 2.4.6 - Unauthenticated Stored Cross-Site Scripting via 'moderation' Parameter (discussion.commentaire)
Summary
The Verified Reviews (Avis Vérifiés) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the 'moderation' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 2.4.6 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. The authentication bypass is possible because ntav_check_data() uses loose != comparisons for signature verification, allowing a JSON body with boolean true values for idWebsite and sign to pass all checks on any configured installation.
Severity
7.2 (High)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: yes Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-10-14 17:52 UTC
CWE
  • CWE-79 - Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
Assigner
Wordfence CNA under the mitre root
CNA scorecard C 65/100 over 2186 records in the last 180 days details
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version CPE status
avisverifies Verified Reviews (Avis Vérifiés) Affected: 0 , ≤ 2.4.6 (semver)
guessed Create a notification for this product.
Credits
nthng
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-94377",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-10-14T17:52:10.790478Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-10-14T17:52:38.163Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "Verified Reviews (Avis V\u00e9rifi\u00e9s)",
          "vendor": "avisverifies",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "2.4.6",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "nthng"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "The Verified Reviews (Avis V\u00e9rifi\u00e9s) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the \u0027moderation\u0027 parameter in all versions up to, and including, 2.4.6 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. The authentication bypass is possible because ntav_check_data() uses loose != comparisons for signature verification, allowing a JSON body with boolean true values for idWebsite and sign to pass all checks on any configured installation."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "baseScore": 7.2,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-79",
              "description": "CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (\u0027Cross-site Scripting\u0027)",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-10-14T03:40:01.971Z",
        "orgId": "b15e7b5b-3da4-40ae-a43c-f7aa60e62599",
        "shortName": "Wordfence"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/a5ed3612-68c8-49a9-915d-c54e002506a4?source=cve"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/netreviews/trunk/includes/review_Pagination.php#L217"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/netreviews/trunk/netreviews.php#L69"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/netreviews/trunk/api_functions.php#L72"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/netreviews/trunk/api_functions.php#L517"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/netreviews/trunk/api_functions.php#L1210"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/netreviews/trunk/api_functions.php#L1059"
        }
      ],
      "timeline": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "time": "2026-10-13T15:34:38.000Z",
          "value": "Disclosed"
        }
      ],
      "title": "Verified Reviews (Avis V\u00e9rifi\u00e9s) \u003c= 2.4.6 - Unauthenticated Stored Cross-Site Scripting via \u0027moderation\u0027 Parameter (discussion.commentaire)"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "b15e7b5b-3da4-40ae-a43c-f7aa60e62599",
    "assignerShortName": "Wordfence",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-94377",
    "datePublished": "2026-10-14T03:40:01.971Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-09-21T12:31:42.096Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-10-14T17:52:38.163Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2026-94377",
      "date": "2026-10-14",
      "epss": "0.00392",
      "percentile": "0.31582"
    },
    "nvd": {
      "cve": {
        "affected": [
          {
            "affectedData": [
              {
                "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
                "product": "Verified Reviews (Avis V\u00e9rifi\u00e9s)",
                "vendor": "avisverifies",
                "versions": [
                  {
                    "lessThanOrEqual": "2.4.6",
                    "status": "affected",
                    "version": "0",
                    "versionType": "semver"
                  }
                ]
              }
            ],
            "source": "security@wordfence.com"
          }
        ],
        "cveTags": [],
        "descriptions": [
          {
            "lang": "en",
            "value": "The Verified Reviews (Avis V\u00e9rifi\u00e9s) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the \u0027moderation\u0027 parameter in all versions up to, and including, 2.4.6 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. The authentication bypass is possible because ntav_check_data() uses loose != comparisons for signature verification, allowing a JSON body with boolean true values for idWebsite and sign to pass all checks on any configured installation."
          }
        ],
        "id": "CVE-2026-94377",
        "lastModified": "2026-10-14T18:19:36.297",
        "metrics": {
          "cvssMetricV31": [
            {
              "cvssData": {
                "attackComplexity": "LOW",
                "attackVector": "NETWORK",
                "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
                "baseScore": 7.2,
                "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
                "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
                "integrityImpact": "LOW",
                "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
                "scope": "CHANGED",
                "userInteraction": "NONE",
                "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
                "version": "3.1"
              },
              "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
              "impactScore": 2.7,
              "source": "security@wordfence.com",
              "type": "Secondary"
            }
          ],
          "ssvcV203": [
            {
              "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
              "ssvcData": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-94377",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "technicalImpact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-10-14T17:52:10.790478Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              }
            }
          ]
        },
        "published": "2026-10-14T04:18:55.297",
        "references": [
          {
            "source": "security@wordfence.com",
            "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/netreviews/trunk/api_functions.php#L1059"
          },
          {
            "source": "security@wordfence.com",
            "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/netreviews/trunk/api_functions.php#L1210"
          },
          {
            "source": "security@wordfence.com",
            "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/netreviews/trunk/api_functions.php#L517"
          },
          {
            "source": "security@wordfence.com",
            "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/netreviews/trunk/api_functions.php#L72"
          },
          {
            "source": "security@wordfence.com",
            "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/netreviews/trunk/includes/review_Pagination.php#L217"
          },
          {
            "source": "security@wordfence.com",
            "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/netreviews/trunk/netreviews.php#L69"
          },
          {
            "source": "security@wordfence.com",
            "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/a5ed3612-68c8-49a9-915d-c54e002506a4?source=cve"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIdentifier": "security@wordfence.com",
        "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
        "weaknesses": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "en",
                "value": "CWE-79"
              }
            ],
            "source": "security@wordfence.com",
            "type": "Secondary"
          }
        ]
      }
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON

Loading timeline…




    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.