GHSA-37M5-42QP-4QPR
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2021-06-18 18:38 – Updated: 2024-09-30 16:32
VLAI?
Summary
Cross-site scripting in LocalStack
Details
A Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in StackLift LocalStack.
Severity ?
6.1 (Medium)
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "localstack"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"last_affected": "0.12.10"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-32091"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-79"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2021-05-19T20:00:18Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2021-05-07T05:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in StackLift LocalStack.",
"id": "GHSA-37m5-42qp-4qpr",
"modified": "2024-09-30T16:32:58Z",
"published": "2021-06-18T18:38:09Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-32091"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://blog.sonarsource.com/hack-the-stack-with-localstack"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-37m5-42qp-4qpr"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/localstack/PYSEC-2021-102.yaml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://portswigger.net/daily-swig/localstack-zero-day-vulnerabilities-chained-to-achieve-remote-takeover-of-local-instances"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Cross-site scripting in LocalStack"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…