GHSA-3v7g-4pg3-7r6j
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-02-26 00:00
Modified
2024-09-12 14:06
Severity ?
8.8 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
8.7 (High) - CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
8.7 (High) - CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Summary
OS Command injection in Apache Airflow
Details
In Apache Airflow, prior to version 2.2.4, some example DAGs did not properly sanitize user-provided params, making them susceptible to OS Command Injection from the web UI.
{ "affected": [ { "package": { "ecosystem": "PyPI", "name": "apache-airflow" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "0" }, { "fixed": "2.2.4" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ] } ], "aliases": [ "CVE-2022-24288" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-78" ], "github_reviewed": true, "github_reviewed_at": "2022-03-01T19:33:11Z", "nvd_published_at": "2022-02-25T09:15:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "In Apache Airflow, prior to version 2.2.4, some example DAGs did not properly sanitize user-provided params, making them susceptible to OS Command Injection from the web UI.", "id": "GHSA-3v7g-4pg3-7r6j", "modified": "2024-09-12T14:06:30Z", "published": "2022-02-26T00:00:44Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-24288" }, { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-3v7g-4pg3-7r6j" }, { "type": "PACKAGE", "url": "https://github.com/apache/airflow" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/apache-airflow/PYSEC-2022-30.yaml" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/dbw5ozcmr0h0lhs0yjph7xdc64oht23t" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" }, { "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N", "type": "CVSS_V4" } ], "summary": "OS Command injection in Apache Airflow" }
Loading...
Loading...
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.