GHSA-4HCM-QG7J-CC3V
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-18 12:31 – Updated: 2026-03-18 12:31
VLAI?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tcp: secure_seq: add back ports to TS offset
This reverts 28ee1b746f49 ("secure_seq: downgrade to per-host timestamp offsets")
tcp_tw_recycle went away in 2017.
Zhouyan Deng reported off-path TCP source port leakage via SYN cookie side-channel that can be fixed in multiple ways.
One of them is to bring back TCP ports in TS offset randomization.
As a bonus, we perform a single siphash() computation to provide both an ISN and a TS offset.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-23247"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-18T11:16:16Z",
"severity": null
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ntcp: secure_seq: add back ports to TS offset\n\nThis reverts 28ee1b746f49 (\"secure_seq: downgrade to per-host timestamp offsets\")\n\ntcp_tw_recycle went away in 2017.\n\nZhouyan Deng reported off-path TCP source port leakage via\nSYN cookie side-channel that can be fixed in multiple ways.\n\nOne of them is to bring back TCP ports in TS offset randomization.\n\nAs a bonus, we perform a single siphash() computation\nto provide both an ISN and a TS offset.",
"id": "GHSA-4hcm-qg7j-cc3v",
"modified": "2026-03-18T12:31:52Z",
"published": "2026-03-18T12:31:52Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-23247"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/165573e41f2f66ef98940cf65f838b2cb575d9d1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/46e5b0d7cf55821527adea471ffe52a5afbd9caf"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/eae2f14ab2efccdb7480fae7d42c4b0116ef8805"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…