GHSA-5CWR-5JXG-PCF6

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-20 18:44 – Updated: 2026-08-20 18:44
VLAI
Summary
Winter: Stored XSS through cached Brand Settings and Editor Settings custom styles
Details

Impact

Users with the backend.manage_branding ("Customize the back-end") or backend.manage_editor ("Manage global code editor preferences") permission can provide custom CSS through Settings → Customize Backend → Styles or Settings → Editor Settings → Markup Styles that is compiled through the LESS CSS parser and rendered on every backend page.

v1.2.13 addressed CVE-2026-32257 and CVE-2026-32258 by applying strip_tags() to the compiled output of BrandSetting::renderCss() and EditorSetting::renderCss(). That fix was incomplete. Both methods cache the raw compiler output with Cache::forever() and applied strip_tags() only to the value returned on a cache miss, so every subsequent cache hit returned the unsanitized value directly into the backend <style> element. The first page render after saving therefore appears sanitized while priming an unsafe cache entry, and the stored XSS remains exploitable from the second render onwards.

Because the custom styles partial is included by both the standard backend layout head and the backend authentication layout, an injected payload also renders on the unauthenticated backend sign-in, password restore, and password reset pages.

Although this is a valid security issue, it's important to note that its severity is relatively low. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker would already need to have trusted access to the Winter CMS backend with a specific administrative permission. The Winter CMS maintainers recommend that the backend.manage_branding and backend.manage_editor permissions only be granted to trusted administrators and developers.

All users are advised to update to the latest version to ensure their systems remain secure.

Patches

This issue has been patched in v1.2.14. The renderCss() methods now apply strip_tags() to the cached value when it is read back, which also neutralizes any cache entry that was poisoned before upgrading.

The backend.manage_editor and backend.manage_default_dashboard permissions have additionally been given warning comments in the permission editor, matching the existing warning on backend.manage_branding.

Workarounds

Apply https://github.com/wintercms/winter/commit/c95d780ab54f3a3f74a94ae1667bf12b3c549d5d manually if unable to upgrade to v1.2.14.

Clearing the application cache removes an already-poisoned entry, but it will be recreated on the next backend page render unless the patch is applied.

References

  • CVE-2026-32257 / GHSA-v7cf-8gh9-gxmj (Stored XSS through Brand Settings custom styles, incompletely patched in v1.2.13)
  • CVE-2026-32258 / GHSA-vgp4-2fc4-qff2 (Stored XSS through Editor Settings custom styles, incompletely patched in v1.2.13)
  • CVE-2025-61674 and CVE-2025-61676 (identical vulnerability in October CMS, patched in v3.7.13 and v4.0.12)
Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 1.2.13"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Packagist",
        "name": "winter/wn-backend-module"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.2.14"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-79"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-08-20T18:44:54Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Impact\n\nUsers with the `backend.manage_branding` (\"Customize the back-end\") or `backend.manage_editor` (\"Manage global code editor preferences\") permission can provide custom CSS through **Settings \u2192 Customize Backend \u2192 Styles** or **Settings \u2192 Editor Settings \u2192 Markup Styles** that is compiled through the LESS CSS parser and rendered on every backend page.\n\nv1.2.13 addressed CVE-2026-32257 and CVE-2026-32258 by applying `strip_tags()` to the compiled output of `BrandSetting::renderCss()` and `EditorSetting::renderCss()`. That fix was incomplete. Both methods cache the **raw** compiler output with `Cache::forever()` and applied `strip_tags()` only to the value returned on a cache miss, so every subsequent cache hit returned the unsanitized value directly into the backend `\u003cstyle\u003e` element. The first page render after saving therefore appears sanitized while priming an unsafe cache entry, and the stored XSS remains exploitable from the second render onwards.\n\nBecause the custom styles partial is included by both the standard backend layout head and the backend authentication layout, an injected payload also renders on the unauthenticated backend sign-in, password restore, and password reset pages.\n\nAlthough this is a valid security issue, it\u0027s important to note that its severity is relatively low. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker would already need to have trusted access to the Winter CMS backend with a specific administrative permission. The Winter CMS maintainers recommend that the `backend.manage_branding` and `backend.manage_editor` permissions only be granted to trusted administrators and developers.\n\nAll users are advised to update to the latest version to ensure their systems remain secure.\n\n### Patches\n\nThis issue has been patched in v1.2.14. The `renderCss()` methods now apply `strip_tags()` to the cached value when it is read back, which also neutralizes any cache entry that was poisoned before upgrading.\n\nThe `backend.manage_editor` and `backend.manage_default_dashboard` permissions have additionally been given warning comments in the permission editor, matching the existing warning on `backend.manage_branding`.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nApply [https://github.com/wintercms/winter/commit/c95d780ab54f3a3f74a94ae1667bf12b3c549d5d](https://github.com/wintercms/winter/commit/c95d780ab54f3a3f74a94ae1667bf12b3c549d5d) manually if unable to upgrade to v1.2.14.\n\nClearing the application cache removes an already-poisoned entry, but it will be recreated on the next backend page render unless the patch is applied.\n\n### References\n\n- CVE-2026-32257 / GHSA-v7cf-8gh9-gxmj (Stored XSS through Brand Settings custom styles, incompletely patched in v1.2.13)\n- CVE-2026-32258 / GHSA-vgp4-2fc4-qff2 (Stored XSS through Editor Settings custom styles, incompletely patched in v1.2.13)\n- CVE-2025-61674 and CVE-2025-61676 (identical vulnerability in October CMS, patched in v3.7.13 and v4.0.12)",
  "id": "GHSA-5cwr-5jxg-pcf6",
  "modified": "2026-08-20T18:44:54Z",
  "published": "2026-08-20T18:44:54Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/wintercms/winter/security/advisories/GHSA-5cwr-5jxg-pcf6"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/wintercms/winter/commit/c95d780ab54f3a3f74a94ae1667bf12b3c549d5d"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/wintercms/winter"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/wintercms/winter/releases/tag/v1.2.14"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Winter: Stored XSS through cached Brand Settings and Editor Settings custom styles"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…