GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-5JJV-X4FQ-QJWP

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2020-10-05 15:48 – Updated: 2023-05-16 16:18
VLAI
Summary
Possible timing attack in derivation_endpoint
Details

Impact

When using the derivation_endpoint plugin, it's possible for the attacker to use a timing attack to guess the signature of the derivation URL.

Patches

The problem has been fixed by comparing sent and calculated signature in constant time, using Rack::Utils.secure_compare. Users using the derivation_endpoint plugin are urged to upgrade to Shrine 3.3.0 or greater.

Workarounds

Users of older Shrine versions can apply the following monkey-patch after loading the derivation_endpoint plugin:

class Shrine
  class UrlSigner
    def verify_signature(string, signature)
      if signature.nil?
        fail InvalidSignature, "missing \"signature\" param"
      elsif !Rack::Utils.secure_compare(signature, generate_signature(string))
        fail InvalidSignature, "provided signature does not match the calculated signature"
      end
    end
  end
end

References

You can read more about timing attacks here.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "RubyGems",
        "name": "shrine"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "3.3.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2020-15237"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-203",
      "CWE-208"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2020-10-05T15:46:53Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Impact\n\nWhen using the `derivation_endpoint` plugin, it\u0027s possible for the attacker to use a timing attack to guess the signature of the derivation URL.\n\n### Patches\n\nThe problem has been fixed by comparing sent and calculated signature in constant time, using `Rack::Utils.secure_compare`. Users using the `derivation_endpoint` plugin are urged to upgrade to Shrine 3.3.0 or greater.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nUsers of older Shrine versions can apply the following monkey-patch after loading the `derivation_endpoint` plugin:\n\n```rb\nclass Shrine\n  class UrlSigner\n    def verify_signature(string, signature)\n      if signature.nil?\n        fail InvalidSignature, \"missing \\\"signature\\\" param\"\n      elsif !Rack::Utils.secure_compare(signature, generate_signature(string))\n        fail InvalidSignature, \"provided signature does not match the calculated signature\"\n      end\n    end\n  end\nend\n```\n\n### References\n\nYou can read more about timing attacks [here](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timing_attack).",
  "id": "GHSA-5jjv-x4fq-qjwp",
  "modified": "2023-05-16T16:18:49Z",
  "published": "2020-10-05T15:48:34Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/shrinerb/shrine/security/advisories/GHSA-5jjv-x4fq-qjwp"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-15237"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/shrinerb/shrine/commit/1b27090ce31543bf39f186c20ea47c8250fca2f0"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/rubysec/ruby-advisory-db/blob/master/gems/shrine/CVE-2020-15237.yml"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/shrinerb/shrine"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Possible timing attack in derivation_endpoint"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…