GHSA-9643-4QGH-G8MX
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-23 21:54 – Updated: 2026-09-23 21:54Elysia v1.4.28 is vulnerable to denial-of-service attacks due to CPU exhaustion in the form data normalization code.
Elysia uses getAll to retrieve value from FormData. It is called directly relative to the total number of key-value pairs in the form data. The total amount of work the for loop has to do grows quadratically, so doubling the number of unique key-value pairs quadruples the amount of work. In the above PoC, each .getAll call scans through all of the n key-value pairs in the form data. Because there are n unique keys in the form data, there are .getAll calls, so in total the form data normalizer has to scan n x n key-value pairs.
Impact
Endpoints using multipart/form-data
Patches
1.4.29
Workarounds
no 100% confirm workaround beside updating the patch
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "elysia"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.4.29"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-56669"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-407",
"CWE-436"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-09-23T21:54:50Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-07-08T21:16:50Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Elysia v1.4.28 is vulnerable to denial-of-service attacks due to CPU exhaustion in the form data normalization code.\n\nElysia uses `getAll` to retrieve value from FormData. It is called directly relative to the total number of key-value pairs in the form data. The total amount of work the for loop has to do grows quadratically, so doubling the number of unique key-value pairs quadruples the amount of work. In the above PoC, each .getAll call scans through all of the `n` key-value pairs in the form data. Because there are `n` unique keys in the form data, there are .getAll calls, so in total the form data normalizer has to scan `n` x `n` key-value pairs.\n\n### Impact\nEndpoints using `multipart/form-data`\n\n### Patches\n1.4.29\n\n### Workarounds\nno 100% confirm workaround beside updating the patch",
"id": "GHSA-9643-4qgh-g8mx",
"modified": "2026-09-23T21:54:50Z",
"published": "2026-09-23T21:54:50Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/elysiajs/elysia/security/advisories/GHSA-9643-4qgh-g8mx"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-56669"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/elysiajs/elysia/commit/8358ff9efbcedf9534995f5977f26b9ceab59329"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://gist.github.com/jviide/ea040eabe7bac058326174e2cd42dfd9"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/elysiajs/elysia"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/elysiajs/elysia/releases/tag/1.4.29"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "elysia has Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity and Interpretation Conflict"
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.