GHSA-M69H-JM2F-2PV8

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-13 20:54 – Updated: 2026-03-13 20:54
VLAI?
Summary
OpenClaw: Feishu reaction events could bypass group authorization and mention gating
Details

Summary

A Feishu reaction-originated synthetic event could misclassify a group conversation as p2p when the inbound reaction payload omitted chat_type. Authorization and mention-gating logic keyed off that incorrect chat type and evaluated the event as a direct message instead of a group message.

Impact

This could bypass groupAllowFrom and requireMention protections for reaction-derived events in Feishu group chats.

Affected versions

openclaw <= 2026.3.11

Patch

Fixed in openclaw 2026.3.12. Reaction events now preserve the correct group context before authorization and mention-gate evaluation. Users should update to 2026.3.12 or later.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 2026.3.11"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "openclaw"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2026.3.12"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-285",
      "CWE-863"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-13T20:54:30Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\n\nA Feishu reaction-originated synthetic event could misclassify a group conversation as `p2p` when the inbound reaction payload omitted `chat_type`. Authorization and mention-gating logic keyed off that incorrect chat type and evaluated the event as a direct message instead of a group message.\n\n### Impact\n\nThis could bypass `groupAllowFrom` and `requireMention` protections for reaction-derived events in Feishu group chats.\n\n### Affected versions\n\n`openclaw` `\u003c= 2026.3.11`\n\n### Patch\n\nFixed in `openclaw` `2026.3.12`. Reaction events now preserve the correct group context before authorization and mention-gate evaluation. Users should update to `2026.3.12` or later.",
  "id": "GHSA-m69h-jm2f-2pv8",
  "modified": "2026-03-13T20:54:30Z",
  "published": "2026-03-13T20:54:30Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-m69h-jm2f-2pv8"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/pull/44088"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/3e730c0332eb0a3dc9e1e8c29a5f95e933317b41"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/releases/tag/v2026.3.12"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "OpenClaw: Feishu reaction events could bypass group authorization and mention gating"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…