GHSA-GCV9-6737-PJQW
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-01-27 16:24 – Updated: 2024-09-24 18:39
VLAI?
Summary
SSRF vulnerability in jupyter-server-proxy
Details
Impact
What kind of vulnerability is it? Server-Side Request Forgery ( SSRF )
Who is impacted? Any user deploying Jupyter Server or Notebook with jupyter-proxy-server extension enabled.
A lack of input validation allowed authenticated clients to proxy requests to other hosts, bypassing the allowed_hosts check. Because authentication is required, which already grants permissions to make the same requests via kernel or terminal execution, this is considered low to moderate severity.
Patches
Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?
Upgrade to 3.2.1, or apply the patch https://github.com/jupyterhub/jupyter-server-proxy/compare/v3.2.0...v3.2.1.patch
For more information
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:
- Open a topic on our forum
- Email the Jupyter security team at security@ipython.org
Severity ?
6.3 (Medium)
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 3.2.0"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "jupyter-server-proxy"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "3.2.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-21697"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-918"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2022-01-25T20:57:43Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2022-01-25T14:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Impact\n\n**What kind of vulnerability is it?** Server-Side Request Forgery ( SSRF )\n\n**Who is impacted?** Any user deploying Jupyter Server or Notebook with jupyter-proxy-server extension enabled. \n\nA lack of input validation allowed authenticated clients to proxy requests to other hosts, bypassing the `allowed_hosts` check. Because authentication is required, which already grants permissions to make the same requests via kernel or terminal execution, this is considered low to moderate severity.\n\n\n### Patches\n\n_Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?_\n\nUpgrade to 3.2.1, or apply the patch https://github.com/jupyterhub/jupyter-server-proxy/compare/v3.2.0...v3.2.1.patch\n\n### For more information\n\nIf you have any questions or comments about this advisory:\n\n* Open a topic [on our forum](https://discourse.jupyter.org)\n* Email the Jupyter security team at [security@ipython.org](mailto:security@ipython.org)\n",
"id": "GHSA-gcv9-6737-pjqw",
"modified": "2024-09-24T18:39:15Z",
"published": "2022-01-27T16:24:26Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/jupyterhub/jupyter-server-proxy/security/advisories/GHSA-gcv9-6737-pjqw"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-21697"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/jupyterhub/jupyter-server-proxy/commit/fd31930bacd12188c448c886e0783529436b99eb"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/jupyterhub/jupyter-server-proxy"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/jupyterhub/jupyter-server-proxy/compare/v3.2.0...v3.2.1.patch"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/jupyter-server-proxy/PYSEC-2022-16.yaml"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "SSRF vulnerability in jupyter-server-proxy"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…