GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-GMJ9-H825-CHQ2

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-01-23 17:19 – Updated: 2025-01-23 23:17
VLAI
Summary
try/except* clauses could allow bypass RestrictedPython via type confusion bug in the CPython interpreter
Details

Impact

Via a type confusion bug in the CPython interpreter when using try/except* RestrictedPython could be bypassed.

We believe this should be fixed upstream in Python itself until that we remove support for try/except* from RestrictedPython. (It has been fixed for some Python versions.)

Patches

Patched in version 8.0 by removing support for try/except* clauses

Workarounds

There is no workaround.

References

none

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "RestrictedPython"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "6.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "8.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-22153"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-843"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2025-01-23T17:19:34Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-01-23T18:15:33Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "### Impact\nVia a type confusion bug in the CPython interpreter when using `try/except*` RestrictedPython could be bypassed.\n\nWe believe this should be fixed upstream in Python itself until that we remove support for `try/except*` from RestrictedPython.\n(It has been fixed for some Python versions.)\n\n### Patches\nPatched in version 8.0 by removing support for `try/except*` clauses\n\n### Workarounds\nThere is no workaround.\n\n### References\nnone\n",
  "id": "GHSA-gmj9-h825-chq2",
  "modified": "2025-01-23T23:17:21Z",
  "published": "2025-01-23T17:19:34Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/zopefoundation/RestrictedPython/security/advisories/GHSA-gmj9-h825-chq2"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22153"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/zopefoundation/RestrictedPython/commit/48a92c5bb617a647cffd0dadd4d5cfe626bcdb2f"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/zopefoundation/RestrictedPython"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "try/except* clauses could allow bypass RestrictedPython via type confusion bug in the CPython interpreter"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…