GHSA-m7p8-9w66-9frm
Vulnerability from github
Published
2018-01-06 01:11
Modified
2023-01-23 21:24
Summary
net-ldap Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability
Details

The Net::LDAP (aka net-ldap) gem before 0.16.0 for Ruby has Missing SSL Certificate Validation.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "RubyGems",
        "name": "net-ldap"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.16.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2017-17718"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-295"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2020-06-16T21:45:19Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The Net::LDAP (aka net-ldap) gem before 0.16.0 for Ruby has Missing SSL Certificate Validation.",
  "id": "GHSA-m7p8-9w66-9frm",
  "modified": "2023-01-23T21:24:13Z",
  "published": "2018-01-06T01:11:34Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-17718"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/ruby-ldap/ruby-net-ldap/issues/258"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/ruby-ldap/ruby-net-ldap/pull/279"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/ruby-ldap/ruby-net-ldap"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/12/17/10"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "net-ldap Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.