GHSA-Q58G-455P-8VW9
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2019-12-16 19:30 – Updated: 2021-10-29 14:10
VLAI?
Summary
In RubyGem excon, interrupted Persistent Connections May Leak Response Data
Details
Impact
There was a race condition around persistent connections, where a connection which is interrupted (such as by a timeout) would leave data on the socket. Subsequent requests would then read this data, returning content from the previous response. The race condition window appears to be short, and it would be difficult to purposefully exploit this.
Patches
The problem has been patched in 0.71.0, users should upgrade to this or a newer version (if one exists).
Workarounds
Users can workaround the problem by disabling persistent connections, though this may cause performance implications.
References
See the patch for further details.
For more information
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory: * Open an issue in excon/issues * Email us at geemus+github@gmail.com
Severity ?
5.8 (Medium)
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "RubyGems",
"name": "excon"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.71.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2019-16779"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-362",
"CWE-664"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2019-12-16T19:28:10Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2019-12-16T20:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Impact\nThere was a race condition around persistent connections, where a connection which is interrupted (such as by a timeout) would leave data on the socket. Subsequent requests would then read this data, returning content from the previous response. The race condition window appears to be short, and it would be difficult to purposefully exploit this.\n\n### Patches\nThe problem has been patched in 0.71.0, users should upgrade to this or a newer version (if one exists).\n\n### Workarounds\nUsers can workaround the problem by disabling persistent connections, though this may cause performance implications.\n\n### References\nSee the [patch](https://github.com/excon/excon/commit/ccb57d7a422f020dc74f1de4e8fb505ab46d8a29) for further details.\n\n### For more information\nIf you have any questions or comments about this advisory:\n* Open an issue in [excon/issues](https://github.com/excon/excon/issues)\n* Email us at [geemus+github@gmail.com](mailto:geemus+github@gmail.com)",
"id": "GHSA-q58g-455p-8vw9",
"modified": "2021-10-29T14:10:27Z",
"published": "2019-12-16T19:30:17Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/excon/excon/security/advisories/GHSA-q58g-455p-8vw9"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-16779"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/excon/excon/commit/ccb57d7a422f020dc74f1de4e8fb505ab46d8a29"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/excon/excon"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/rubysec/ruby-advisory-db/blob/master/gems/excon/CVE-2019-16779.yml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/01/msg00015.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-01/msg00021.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-01/msg00062.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "In RubyGem excon, interrupted Persistent Connections May Leak Response Data"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…