GHSA-vc47-6rqg-c7f5
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-11-19 00:30
Modified
2023-01-26 21:12
Severity ?
Summary
HTTP response splitting in CGI
Details
Ruby gem cgi.rb prior to versions 0.3.5, 0.2.2 and 0.1.0.2 allow HTTP header injection. If a CGI application using the CGI library inserts untrusted input into the HTTP response header, an attacker can exploit it to insert a newline character to split a header, and inject malicious content to deceive clients. This issue has been patched in versions 0.3.5, 0.2.2 and 0.1.0.2.
{ affected: [ { package: { ecosystem: "RubyGems", name: "cgi", }, ranges: [ { events: [ { introduced: "0.3.0", }, { fixed: "0.3.5", }, ], type: "ECOSYSTEM", }, ], }, { package: { ecosystem: "RubyGems", name: "cgi", }, ranges: [ { events: [ { introduced: "0.2.0", }, { fixed: "0.2.2", }, ], type: "ECOSYSTEM", }, ], }, { package: { ecosystem: "RubyGems", name: "cgi", }, ranges: [ { events: [ { introduced: "0", }, { fixed: "0.1.0.2", }, ], type: "ECOSYSTEM", }, ], }, ], aliases: [ "CVE-2021-33621", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-436", "CWE-74", ], github_reviewed: true, github_reviewed_at: "2022-11-24T01:59:37Z", nvd_published_at: "2022-11-18T23:15:00Z", severity: "HIGH", }, details: "Ruby gem cgi.rb prior to versions 0.3.5, 0.2.2 and 0.1.0.2 allow HTTP header injection. If a CGI application using the CGI library inserts untrusted input into the HTTP response header, an attacker can exploit it to insert a newline character to split a header, and inject malicious content to deceive clients. This issue has been patched in versions 0.3.5, 0.2.2 and 0.1.0.2.", id: "GHSA-vc47-6rqg-c7f5", modified: "2023-01-26T21:12:34Z", published: "2022-11-19T00:30:55Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-33621", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://hackerone.com/reports/1204695", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/rubysec/ruby-advisory-db/blob/master/gems/cgi/CVE-2021-33621.yml", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/06/msg00012.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/DQR7LWED6VAPD5ATYOBZIGJQPCUBRJBX", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/THVTYHHEOVLQFCFHWURZYO7PVUPBHRZD", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/YACE6ORF2QBXXBK2V2CM36D7TZMEJVAS", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/DQR7LWED6VAPD5ATYOBZIGJQPCUBRJBX", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/THVTYHHEOVLQFCFHWURZYO7PVUPBHRZD", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/YACE6ORF2QBXXBK2V2CM36D7TZMEJVAS", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202401-27", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20221228-0004", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2022/11/22/http-response-splitting-in-cgi-cve-2021-33621", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], summary: "HTTP response splitting in CGI", }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.