GHSA-XJW2-6JM9-RF67
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-08-30 20:47 – Updated: 2023-08-30 20:47
VLAI?
Summary
Sandbox escape via various forms of "format".
Details
Impact
Python's "format" functionality allows someone controlling the format string to "read" all objects accessible through recursive attribute lookup and subscription from objects he can access. This can lead to critical information disclosure.
With RestrictedPython, the format functionality is available via the format and format_map methods of str (and unicode) (accessed either via the class or its instances) and via string.Formatter.
All known versions of RestrictedPython are vulnerable.
Patches
The issue will be fixed in 5.4 and 6.2.
Workarounds
There are no workarounds to fix the issue without upgrading.
References
- https://docs.python.org/3/library/stdtypes.html#str.format_map
- http://lucumr.pocoo.org/2016/12/29/careful-with-str-format/
- https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/51580
For more information
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:
- Open an issue in the RestrictedPython issue tracker
- Email us at security@plone.org
Credits
Thanks for analysing and reporting the go to:
- Abhishek Govindarasu
- Ankush Menat
- Ward Theunisse
Severity ?
8.3 (High)
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 5.3"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "RestrictedPython"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 6.1"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "RestrictedPython"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "6.0"
},
{
"fixed": "6.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-41039"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-74"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2023-08-30T20:47:58Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2023-08-30T18:15:09Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Impact\nPython\u0027s \"format\" functionality allows someone controlling the format string to \"read\" all objects accessible through recursive attribute lookup and subscription from objects he can access. This can lead to critical information disclosure.\nWith `RestrictedPython`, the format functionality is available via the `format` and `format_map` methods of `str` (and `unicode`) (accessed either via the class or its instances) and via `string.Formatter`.\nAll known versions of `RestrictedPython` are vulnerable. \n\n### Patches\nThe issue will be fixed in 5.4 and 6.2.\n\n### Workarounds\nThere are no workarounds to fix the issue without upgrading.\n\n### References\n* https://docs.python.org/3/library/stdtypes.html#str.format_map\n* http://lucumr.pocoo.org/2016/12/29/careful-with-str-format/\n* https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/51580\n\n### For more information\n\nIf you have any questions or comments about this advisory:\n\n* Open an issue in the [RestrictedPython issue tracker](https://github.com/zopefoundation/RestrictedPython/issues)\n* Email us at [security@plone.org](mailto:security@plone.org)\n\n### Credits\n\nThanks for analysing and reporting the go to:\n\n* Abhishek Govindarasu\n* Ankush Menat\n* Ward Theunisse\n\n",
"id": "GHSA-xjw2-6jm9-rf67",
"modified": "2023-08-30T20:47:58Z",
"published": "2023-08-30T20:47:58Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/zopefoundation/RestrictedPython/security/advisories/GHSA-xjw2-6jm9-rf67"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-41039"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/zopefoundation/RestrictedPython/commit/4134aedcff17c977da7717693ed89ce56d54c120"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/zopefoundation/RestrictedPython"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Sandbox escape via various forms of \"format\"."
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…