GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

BREW-ACRONYM-CVE-2026-81725 (PYSEC-2026-3752)

Vulnerability from osv_homebrew – Published: 2026-09-03 08:45 – Updated: 2026-09-17 18:47 – Source website
VLAI
Summary
NLTK: Pl196xCorpusReader has quadratic ReDoS on malformed TEI blocks
Details

Summary

Pl196xCorpusReader still parses whole TEI blocks with multiple lazy regexes over attacker-controlled text. A malformed file with many opening tags and no matching closing tags forces repeated rescans and produces quadratic CPU growth in public reader APIs.

Details

  • Vulnerability type: Regular-expression denial of service
  • Affected component: nltk.corpus.reader.pl196x.TEICorpusView.read_block and Pl196xCorpusReader public methods
  • Affected versions: Published 3.9.4 and current source v3.10.0-rc2 both reproduced.
  • Patched versions: Not yet patched
  • Root cause: Lazy .*? whole-block regexes rescan untrusted XML-like blocks from each opening-tag position.

The parser uses regexes for paragraphs, sentences, and word tags across the whole <text> block. When the attacker supplies many unmatched opening tags, each attempt scans toward the end of the block and fails, then restarts from the next opening tag. There is near four-times runtime growth each time the number of malformed <p> tags doubled, through normal public calls such as words() and tagged_words().

PoC

Preconditions - The application parses attacker-influenced PL196X or TEI-like corpus files through public reader APIs.

Steps 1. Create a corpus file with a valid header followed by a <text> block that contains many opening tags and no matching closing tags. 2. Instantiate Pl196xCorpusReader on that corpus. 3. Call words() or tagged_words() and measure elapsed time as the malformed tag count doubles. 4. Observe near quadratic growth instead of near-linear behavior.

Minimal reproducible excerpt

size=1000 0.014s
size=2000 0.057s
size=4000 0.231s
size=8000 0.927s

Impact

A consumer that accepts attacker-influenced corpus files can be forced into heavy CPU use and parser-thread stalling before the application concludes the input contains no valid content.

Remediation

Replace the whole-block lazy-regex parser with a linear parser or bounded tokenizer, and add regression tests that assert near-linear behavior on malformed inputs with many unmatched tags.


{
  "affected": [
    {
      "ecosystem_specific": {
        "fix": "bump",
        "range_state": "fixed",
        "resource": "nltk",
        "resource_purl": "pkg:pypi/nltk@3.10.3",
        "upstream_fixed_in": "3.10.3"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Homebrew",
        "name": "acronym",
        "purl": "pkg:brew/acronym"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "2.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.0.0_5"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "confidence": "high",
    "source": "matched",
    "strategy": "registry",
    "upstream_evidence": [
      {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "key": "pkg:pypi/nltk@3.10.3",
        "name": "nltk",
        "resource": "nltk",
        "strategy": "registry",
        "subject_version": "3.10.3"
      }
    ]
  },
  "details": "### Summary\n\n`Pl196xCorpusReader` still parses whole TEI blocks with multiple lazy regexes over attacker-controlled text. A malformed file with many opening tags and no matching closing tags forces repeated rescans and produces quadratic CPU growth in public reader APIs.\n\n### Details\n\n- **Vulnerability type:** Regular-expression denial of service\n- **Affected component:** `nltk.corpus.reader.pl196x.TEICorpusView.read_block` and `Pl196xCorpusReader` public methods\n- **Affected versions:** Published `3.9.4` and current source `v3.10.0-rc2` both reproduced.\n- **Patched versions:** Not yet patched\n- **Root cause:** Lazy `.*?` whole-block regexes rescan untrusted XML-like blocks from each opening-tag position.\n\nThe parser uses regexes for paragraphs, sentences, and word tags across the whole `\u003ctext\u003e` block. When the attacker supplies many unmatched opening tags, each attempt scans toward the end of the block and fails, then restarts from the next opening tag. There is near four-times runtime growth each time the number of malformed `\u003cp\u003e` tags doubled, through normal public calls such as `words()` and `tagged_words()`.\n\n### PoC\n\n**Preconditions**\n- The application parses attacker-influenced PL196X or TEI-like corpus files through public reader APIs.\n\n**Steps**\n1. Create a corpus file with a valid header followed by a `\u003ctext\u003e` block that contains many opening tags and no matching closing tags.\n2. Instantiate `Pl196xCorpusReader` on that corpus.\n3. Call `words()` or `tagged_words()` and measure elapsed time as the malformed tag count doubles.\n4. Observe near quadratic growth instead of near-linear behavior.\n\n**Minimal reproducible excerpt**\n\n```text\nsize=1000 0.014s\nsize=2000 0.057s\nsize=4000 0.231s\nsize=8000 0.927s\n```\n\n### Impact\n\nA consumer that accepts attacker-influenced corpus files can be forced into heavy CPU use and parser-thread stalling before the application concludes the input contains no valid content.\n\n### Remediation\n\nReplace the whole-block lazy-regex parser with a linear parser or bounded tokenizer, and add regression tests that assert near-linear behavior on malformed inputs with many unmatched tags.",
  "id": "BREW-acronym-CVE-2026-81725",
  "modified": "2026-09-17T18:47:55Z",
  "published": "2026-09-03T08:45:01Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/nltk/nltk/security/advisories/GHSA-8mpw-7fpc-4gqj"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-81725"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/nltk/nltk/commit/7808692d451b962711005d954859bb83aabcf8fa"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/nltk/nltk"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/nltk/nltk/releases/tag/v3.10.3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/nltk/PYSEC-2026-3752.yaml"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/nltk-before-3.10.3-regular-expression-denial-of-service-via-pl196xcorpusreader"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.7.3",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "NLTK: Pl196xCorpusReader has quadratic ReDoS on malformed TEI blocks",
  "upstream": [
    "PYSEC-2026-3752",
    "CVE-2026-81725",
    "GHSA-8mpw-7fpc-4gqj"
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…