CERTA-2005-AVI-459

Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: - Updated:

Un utilisateur distant mal intentionné peut initier une négociation IKE volontairement mal formée qui va provoquer l'arrêt du service concerné, vpnd.

Description

IKE est un protocole utilisé pour la négotiation des associations de sécurité pour IPsec. Une erreur dans le code de vpnd le rend vulnérable à une attaque en déni de service.

Solution

Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).

None
Impacted products
Vendor Product Description
Check Point N/A Check Point Express CI R57,
Check Point N/A VPN-1 Pro NGX R60,
Check Point N/A Firewall-1 GX 3.0.
Check Point N/A VPN-1/Firewall-1 NG AI R54, R55, R55W, R55P,

Show details on source website

{
  "$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
  "affected_systems": [
    {
      "description": "Check Point Express CI R57,",
      "product": {
        "name": "N/A",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Check Point",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "VPN-1 Pro NGX R60,",
      "product": {
        "name": "N/A",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Check Point",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "Firewall-1 GX 3.0.",
      "product": {
        "name": "N/A",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Check Point",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "VPN-1/Firewall-1 NG AI R54, R55, R55W, R55P,",
      "product": {
        "name": "N/A",
        "vendor": {
          "name": "Check Point",
          "scada": false
        }
      }
    }
  ],
  "affected_systems_content": null,
  "content": "## Description\n\nIKE est un protocole utilis\u00e9 pour la n\u00e9gotiation des associations de\ns\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour IPsec. Une erreur dans le code de vpnd le rend vuln\u00e9rable\n\u00e0 une attaque en d\u00e9ni de service.\n\n## Solution\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des\ncorrectifs (cf. section Documentation).\n",
  "cves": [],
  "links": [
    {
      "title": "Avis de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027UNIRAS 273756/NISCC/ISAKMP du 14    novembre 2005 :",
      "url": "http://www.uniras.gov.uk/niscc/docs/br-20051114-01013.html"
    },
    {
      "title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 CheckPoint sk31316 du 16 novembre 2005    :      http://secureknowledge.us.checkpoint.com/SecureKnowledge/login.do?id=sk31316",
      "url": "http://secureknowledge.us.checkpoint.com/SecureKnowledge/viewSolutionDocument.do?id=sk31316"
    }
  ],
  "reference": "CERTA-2005-AVI-459",
  "revisions": [
    {
      "description": "version initiale.",
      "revision_date": "2005-11-16T00:00:00.000000"
    }
  ],
  "risks": [
    {
      "description": "D\u00e9ni de service distant"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Un utilisateur distant mal intentionn\u00e9 peut initier une n\u00e9gociation IKE\nvolontairement mal form\u00e9e qui va provoquer l\u0027arr\u00eat du service concern\u00e9,\nvpnd.\n",
  "title": "Vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 du service vpnd de VPN-1/Firewall-1",
  "vendor_advisories": [
    {
      "published_at": null,
      "title": "Avis de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 273756/NISCC/ISAKMP de l\u0027UNIRAS",
      "url": null
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…