CERTA-2006-AVI-109

Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: - Updated:

Une vulnérabilité dans Metamail permet à un utilisateur distant mal intentionné de provoquer un déni de service ou d'exécuter du code arbitraire sur la machine vulnérable.

Description

Une vulnérabilité de type débordement de tampon dans Metamail permet à un utilisateur distant mal intentionné de provoquer un déni de service ou d'exécuter du code arbitraire sur la machine vulnérable par le biais d'un courrier électronique malicieusement construit.

Solution

Se référer au bulletin de sécurité des éditeurs pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).

Metamail 2.7.x.

Impacted products
Vendor Product Description

Show details on source website

{
  "$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
  "affected_systems": [],
  "affected_systems_content": "\u003cp\u003eMetamail 2.7.x.\u003c/p\u003e",
  "content": "## Description\n\nUne vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 de type d\u00e9bordement de tampon dans Metamail permet \u00e0\nun utilisateur distant mal intentionn\u00e9 de provoquer un d\u00e9ni de service\nou d\u0027ex\u00e9cuter du code arbitraire sur la machine vuln\u00e9rable par le biais\nd\u0027un courrier \u00e9lectronique malicieusement construit.\n\n## Solution\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 des \u00e9diteurs pour l\u0027obtention des\ncorrectifs (cf. section Documentation).\n",
  "cves": [
    {
      "name": "CVE-2006-0709",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2006-0709"
    }
  ],
  "links": [
    {
      "title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 RedHat RHSA-2006:0217 du 21 f\u00e9vrier    2006 :",
      "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2006-0217.html"
    },
    {
      "title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Debian DSA 995 du 13 mars 2006 :",
      "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/dsa-995"
    },
    {
      "title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Gentoo GLSA 200603-16 du 17 mars 2006    :",
      "url": "http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200603-16.xml"
    },
    {
      "title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Mandriva MDKSA-2006:047 du 22 f\u00e9vrier    2006 :",
      "url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDKSA-2006:047"
    },
    {
      "title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 SUSE SuSE-SA:2006:005 du 03 mars 2006    :",
      "url": "http://www.novell.com/linux/security/advisories/2006_05_sr.html"
    }
  ],
  "reference": "CERTA-2006-AVI-109",
  "revisions": [
    {
      "description": "version initiale.",
      "revision_date": "2006-03-14T00:00:00.000000"
    },
    {
      "description": "ajout de la r\u00e9f\u00e9rence au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Gentoo.",
      "revision_date": "2006-03-20T00:00:00.000000"
    }
  ],
  "risks": [
    {
      "description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance"
    },
    {
      "description": "D\u00e9ni de service"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Une vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 dans Metamail permet \u00e0 un utilisateur distant mal\nintentionn\u00e9 de provoquer un d\u00e9ni de service ou d\u0027ex\u00e9cuter du code\narbitraire sur la machine vuln\u00e9rable.\n",
  "title": "Vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 dans Metamail",
  "vendor_advisories": [
    {
      "published_at": null,
      "title": "Rapport d\u0027erreur Debian du 12 f\u00e9vrier 2006",
      "url": "http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=352482"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…