CERTA-2008-AVI-018

Vulnerability from certfr_avis - Published: - Updated:

Des vulnérabilités dans le module imapeop de Python permettent à un utilisateur malveillant de provoquer un déni de service ou d'exécuter un code arbitraire à distance.

Description

Des débordements d'entiers ne sont pas correctement gérés dans le module imapeop de Python. Un utilisateur malveillant, capable de soumettre une image spécialement conçue à une application utilisant le module vulnérable, peut provoquer un déni de service ou d'exécuter un code arbitraire à distance.

Solution

Se référer au bulletin de sécurité de l'éditeur pour l'obtention des correctifs (cf. section Documentation).

Applications utilisant le module imageop de Python, versions 2.5.1 et précédentes.

Impacted products
Vendor Product Description

Show details on source website

{
  "$ref": "https://www.cert.ssi.gouv.fr/openapi.json",
  "affected_systems": [],
  "affected_systems_content": "\u003cP\u003eApplications utilisant le module \u003cSPAN class=\n  \"textit\"\u003eimageop\u003c/SPAN\u003e de Python, versions 2.5.1 et  pr\u00e9c\u00e9dentes.\u003c/P\u003e",
  "content": "## Description\n\nDes d\u00e9bordements d\u0027entiers ne sont pas correctement g\u00e9r\u00e9s dans le module\nimapeop de Python. Un utilisateur malveillant, capable de soumettre une\nimage sp\u00e9cialement con\u00e7ue \u00e0 une application utilisant le module\nvuln\u00e9rable, peut provoquer un d\u00e9ni de service ou d\u0027ex\u00e9cuter un code\narbitraire \u00e0 distance.\n\n## Solution\n\nSe r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de l\u0027\u00e9diteur pour l\u0027obtention des\ncorrectifs (cf. section Documentation).\n",
  "cves": [
    {
      "name": "CVE-2007-4965",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2007-4965"
    }
  ],
  "links": [
    {
      "title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 RedHat RHSA-2007:1076 du 10 d\u00e9cembre    2007 :",
      "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-1076.html"
    },
    {
      "title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Gentoo GLSA-200711-07 du 07 novembre    2007 :",
      "url": "http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200711-07.xml"
    },
    {
      "title": "Mise \u00e0 jour de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Fedora FEDORA-2007-2663 du 29    octobre 2007 :",
      "url": "https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-annoucnce/2007-October/msg00378.html"
    },
    {
      "title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Mandriva MDVSA-2008:013 du 14 janvier    2008 :",
      "url": "http://www.mandriva.com/archives/security/advisories"
    },
    {
      "title": "Bulletin de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 Apple 307179 du 02 janvier 2008 :",
      "url": "http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=307179"
    }
  ],
  "reference": "CERTA-2008-AVI-018",
  "revisions": [
    {
      "description": "version initiale.",
      "revision_date": "2008-01-15T00:00:00.000000"
    }
  ],
  "risks": [
    {
      "description": "D\u00e9ni de service \u00e0 distance"
    },
    {
      "description": "Ex\u00e9cution de code arbitraire \u00e0 distance"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Des vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans le module \u003cspan class=\"textit\"\u003eimapeop\u003c/span\u003e de\nPython permettent \u00e0 un utilisateur malveillant de provoquer un d\u00e9ni de\nservice ou d\u0027ex\u00e9cuter un code arbitraire \u00e0 distance.\n",
  "title": "Vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9s dans Python",
  "vendor_advisories": [
    {
      "published_at": null,
      "title": "CVE-2007-4965",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2007-4965"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…